Adenocarcinoma of the prostate in men younger than 40 years of age: diagnosis and treatment with emphasis on radical prostatectomy findings

Comparison of histopathological features, survival, and oncological outcome between patients under and above 55-year-old with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy

Background:

To compare the disease course, histopathological features and survival rates of prostate cancer (PCa) between patients aged ⩽ 55 and > 55 year old.

Materials and methods:

In this retrospective study, we enrolled 644 patients with organ-confide prostate cancer who had undergone radical prostatectomy from 2005 to 2018. Seventy-six (11.8%) patients were under 55 years of age (group 1) and 568 (88.2%) patients were >55 years old (group 2).

Results:

Pre-operative hypertension was detected in 4 (5.3%) patients of group 1 and 80 (14.1%) patients of groups 2 ( p = 0.029). The mean (±SD) prostate volume was higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (34.1(±8.4) ml vs 54.1(±9.9) ml, p < 0.001). Positive surgery margin was observed in 15 (19.7%) and 58 (10.2%) patients in group 1 and 2, respectively ( p = 0.020). Co-existence of diabetes mellitus, mean pre-operative PSA, Gleason’s score, and permanent pathology and pathologic stage were similar between the two groups. Log-rank test failed to show any statistical difference in terms of biochemical-relapse free survival, local recurrence-free survival, and metastasis-free survival between the two groups ( p = 0.316, 0.441, 0.654, respectively). After performing multivariate analysis, positive surgical margin was the only factor that was independently predictive of biochemical relapse ( p < 0.001) and local recurrence/metastasis ( p < 0.001).

Conclusion:

No difference was observed in terms of histopathologic features, biochemical relapse, and local recurrence/metastasis-free survival rates between patients younger and older than 55 years of age.

Clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of prostate cancer diagnosed in young men aged up to 45 years

AIMS

To characterise and compare the poorly understood clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) in very young patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of PCa diagnosed in 90 patients aged ≤45 years with those of PCa diagnosed in 200 patients of typical screening age (i.e. 60-65 years). Patients diagnosed at a younger age had a higher frequency of a family history of PCa and lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels than those diagnosed at regular screening age. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical stage or pathological characteristics of the core biopsy specimens between the groups. Young patients had a higher frequency of Grade Group 1 disease at radical prostatectomy. A subset of 13 aggressive PCa cases from young patients underwent successful DNA-based next-generation sequencing. In all, 46.2% (6/13) had TMPRSS2 rearrangements and 23.1% (3/13) had relevant pathogenic variants in DNA damage repair genes, including a mismatch repair-deficient case with biallelic inactivation of MLH1. No statistically significant differences were observed in PCa-specific recurrence/progression between the younger and older patients, including after adjustment for clinical stage, PSA level, and Grade Group.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the clinicopathological and molecular features of PCa diagnosed in young patients were comparable to those of PCa diagnosed in patients of screening age. Early-onset PCa cases were not enriched in any of the known molecular PCa subtypes in this small series.

Pathological Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Occurring in Younger Men: A Retrospective Study of Prostatectomy Patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine if differences exist in the pathological characteristics of prostate cancer occurring in younger men as compared to the disease when it occurs in older men.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on prostatectomy specimens from the prostate cancer database of a single large Australian pathology practice which services a large proportion of hospitals within 1 state. Data were extracted regarding the pathological characteristics of the cancers and a univariate analysis was conducted against 2 age cutoffs.

RESULTS

Data were extracted for all prostatectomy specimens between 2011 and 2017 in 11,551 men. One hundred and thirty-two men were 45 years old and younger, and 545 were 50 years old and younger. Statistically significant differences were found in a number of pathological characteristics. Younger men had lower grade group disease, and within that had less adverse pathological characteristics. In particular, even after controlling for confounding in men 45 and younger, in Grade Group 2 disease there was a lower risk of extra prostatic extension (17.5% vs 34.4%, P = .003), and lymph node involvement (0% vs 0.8%, P = .006), with trends toward superiority in other domains.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that prostate cancer in younger men tends to be lower grade and stage disease compared to older men. This is in contrast to persistent views within the urological community and may have an impact on disease management in younger men.

Cyberknife Radioablation of Prostate Cancer – Preliminary Results for 400 Patients

Objectives: To evaluate the tolerance and effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) applied in the treatment of low and intermediate risk (LR & IR) prostate cancer patients (PCP) and provide an evaluation of the level of risk group impact on treatment results. In addition, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) usage and prostatic specific antigen (PSA) decline after SABR were assessed. Material and Methods: A total of 400 PCP (213 LR and 187 IR, including T2c) were irradiated with a CyberKnife using fd 7.25 Gy to TD 36.25 Gy. At the start of treatment, 60.3% of patients were undergoing ADT and this gradually decreased to 0% after 38 months. Follow-up was for a median of 15.0 months. Patients were monitored on SABR completion and 1, 4, 8 months later and then subsequently every 6 months. GI (Gastro-Intestinal) and GU (Genito-Urinary) acute and late adverse effects, PSA and ADT usage were evaluated. Results: Failure was noted in 9 patients (2.25%) (5 in LR and 4 in IR groups) - 4 relapses and 5 nodal metastases. No G3/4 late adverse effects (EORTC/RTOG) were observed. Some 0.5% of G3 GU and 0.3% of G3 GI acute reactions were noted respectively on the SABR completion day and one month later. The median of PSA declined 1.5 ng/ml during the first month and 0.6 ng/ml during the next three months. No impact of risk groups on treatment results was found. An impact of ADT on PSA decline was only confirmed for time point interactions. Conclusions: SABR for LR and IR PCP is a safe and effective treatment. The inclusion of T2c patients and the low percentage of IR patient failure permit us the assumption that this procedure could be utilized in the treatment of more advanced cases. The results do not allow clear definition of the impact of ADT on radioablation results in LR and IR+ T2c cases.

Prostate Cancer: How Young is too Young?

Prostate cancer is the most common non-cutaneous malignancy in men. It is generally considered a cancer of the elderly, and the median age of presentation is 68 years. However 10% of new diagnoses in the USA occur in men aged ≤ 55 years. This may be due to more prevalent screening nowadays, and may also reflect the diagnosis of an increasingly recognized but underappreciated entity, i.e. early-onset prostate cancer. Patients with early onset prostate cancer pose unique challenges. Current data suggest that early-onset prostate cancer is a distinct phenotype-from both an etiological and clinical perspective- that deserves further attention. We present a case of a 28-year-old man who presented with lower urinary tract symptoms and was diagnosed with advanced stage prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer in young men: an important clinical entity

Prostate cancer is considered a disease of older men (aged >65 years), but today over 10% of new diagnoses in the USA occur in young men aged ≤55 years. Early-onset prostate cancer, that is prostate cancer diagnosed at age ≤55 years, differs from prostate cancer diagnosed at an older age in several ways. Firstly, among men with high-grade and advanced-stage prostate cancer, those diagnosed at a young age have a higher cause-specific mortality than men diagnosed at an older age, except those over age 80 years. This finding suggests that important biological differences exist between early-onset prostate cancer and late-onset disease. Secondly, early-onset prostate cancer has a strong genetic component, which indicates that young men with prostate cancer could benefit from evaluation of genetic risk. Furthermore, although the majority of men with early-onset prostate cancer are diagnosed with low-risk disease, the extended life expectancy of these patients exposes them to long-term effects of treatment-related morbidities and to long-term risk of disease progression leading to death from prostate cancer. For these reasons, patients with early-onset prostate cancer pose unique challenges, as well as opportunities, for both research and clinical communities. Current data suggest that early-onset prostate cancer is a distinct phenotype-from both an aetiological and clinical perspective-that deserves further attention.

Efficacy of Repeated Transrectal Prostate Biopsy in Men Younger Than 50 Years With an Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Concentration (>3.0 ng/mL): Risks and Benefits Based on Biopsy Results and Follow-up Status

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer is rare in men younger than 50 years. Digital rectal examination (DRE) and measurement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations are standard screening methods for detecting prostate cancer. We retrospectively investigated the risks and benefits of repeated transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate needle biopsies in relation to the follow-up status of men younger than 50 years with a consistently high PSA concentration (>3.0 ng/mL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the period from January 2000 through February 2013, we reviewed patient's ages, dates of procedures, DRE results, frequencies of biopsies, results of the biopsies, periods of follow-up, PSA concentrations, and prostate volumes in Chonbuk National University Hospital records. We conducted telephone interviews in patients who did not undergo regular follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 44.7 years, and the mean PSA concentration was 8.59 ng/mL (range, 3.04-131 ng/mL) before biopsy. The PSA concentration was significantly different (p<0.001) between the patients with prostate cancer and those with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Nineteen patients underwent repeated prostate biopsy; however, in only one patient did the pathologic findings indicate a change from BPH to prostate cancer. We identified several complications after transrectal biopsy through an evaluation of follow-up data.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients with benign prostatic disease based on their first biopsy were shown to have benign disease based on all repeated biopsies (15.83%), except for one patient; however, several complications were noted after biopsy. Therefore, the risks and benefits of repeated biopsy in young patients should be considered because of the low rate of change from benign to malignant disease despite continuously high PSA concentrations (>3.0 ng/mL).

Sexual dysfunction and the preservation of manhood: experiences of men with prostate cancer

This study explored the experiences of men living with sexual dysfunction as a consequence of having been treated for prostate cancer. An ethnoculturally diverse sample of 18 men (14 heterosexual, and four homosexual) participated in a series of four to five in-depth interviews. These one-on-one interviews were designed to elicit information pertaining to their beliefs, values and performances regarding masculinity vis-a-vis prostate cancer and its treatment. Interview transcripts were analyzed using the grounded theory method. The core category of 'Preserving Manhood' incorporated five major themes: enhancing the odds; disrupting a core performance; baring an invisible stigma; effortful-mechanical sex; and working around the loss. We conclude that men's performances of sexuality and masculinity were highly interwoven; that loss of sexual functioning constituted a focal disruption for participants; and in some instances, posed a significant threat to their masculine identities.

Outcome of Prostate Biopsy in Men Younger than 40 Years of Age with High Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels

Purpose

Prostate cancer is rarely diagnosed in men younger than 40 years of age. At present, the available data show a low rate of cancer detection from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening of this group of young men. We analyzed the outcome of prostate biopsy results in patients of this age group with a high PSA.

Materials and Methods

Between October 1997 and August 2008, a total of 81 men less than 40 years of age were referred from the Health Care Promotion Center as the result of elevated PSA levels. Six men with prostatitis were excluded. The remaining 75 men were asymptomatic and had normal findings on the digital rectal examination (DRE) and were selected to have a transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for suspected prostate cancer. The patients with sustained high PSA levels underwent repeat biopsies.

Results

The median age of the 75 men was 33 years (range, 26-40 years) and the mean PSA level was 6.57 ng/ml (range, 4.32-13.45 ng/ml). The results of the primary biopsy was 1 (1.3%) case of prostate cancer, 70 cases (93%) with benign tissue, 2 cases (2.6%) with inflammation, and 1 case each (1.3%) with high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP). Of the 10 men who underwent a second biopsy, all had benign findings. Three of the men who underwent a third biopsy all had benign tissue findings.

Conclusions

The prostate cancer detection rate in young men less than 40 years of age with high PSA levels and normal DREs was very low. Repeat biopsy for sustained high PSA levels in young men less than 40 years of age may not be indicated.

Correlations between age, Charlson score and outcome in clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer

According to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, a life expectancy of > 10 years is considered an important factor in the treatment of prostate cancer. The Charlson score is used to predict mortality based on comorbidities. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between age, Charlson score and outcome in patients with cT3a prostate cancer. Between 1987 and 2004, 200 patients, who were with clinical T3a prostate cancer and who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), were previously detected by digital rectal examination (DRE). Patients were categorized into two age groups (< 65 and >or= 65 years old). Patients were also divided into two groups according to Charlson score ( = 0 and >or= 1). Both age and Charlson score were analyzed regarding their predictive power of patients' outcomes. The mean follow-up period was 70.6 months, and the mean age of patients was 63.3 years. In all, 106 patients were < 65 years old and 94 patients were >or= 65 years old. Age was a significant predictor of overall survival (OS). A Charlson score of 0 was found in 110 patients, and of >or= 1 in 90 patients. Charlson score was not a significant predictor of biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS), clinical progression-free survival (CPFS) or OS. Cox multivariate analysis showed that margin status was a significant independent factor in BPFS, and cancer volume was a significant independent factor in CPFS. Charlson score does not influence the outcome in patients with clinical locally advanced prostate cancer. Age may influence OS. RP can be performed in motivated healthy older patients. However, the patients need to be counseled regarding possible surgery-related side effects, such as urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, which are age- and comorbidity-dependent.

Progression after radical prostatectomy for men in their thirties compared to older men

OBJECTIVE

To assess the biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy (RP) specifically for men aged 30-39 years, as previous studies suggest that prostate cancer in young men might be more aggressive.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From a large (15 899) database of RPs (1975-2007) we identified 42 men aged 30-39, 893 aged 40-49, 4085 aged 50-59, 3766 aged 60-69, and 182 men aged > or =70 years old. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were compared between men aged 30-39 years and older men.

RESULTS

Among the men in their thirties, 81% had organ-confined disease in the RP specimen, vs 62% of men aged > or =40 years. At a mean follow-up of 5 years, there was biochemical progression in 4.8% of men in their thirties and 16.1% of men age > or =40 years (P = 0.055). The corresponding 5-year biochemical progression-free survival estimates were 95% for men in their thirties and 83% for men aged > or =40 years (P = 0.045). On multivariate analysis, increasing age was a significant independent predictor of biochemical progression.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to earlier reports, in the present study men in their thirties did not have more aggressive disease. Instead, they had more favourable pathological features and progression-free survival rates than their older counterparts. After controlling for other prognostic variables on multivariate analysis, being in the fourth decade was independently associated with a lower risk of biochemical progression. These results suggest that early aggressive treatment for these patients with a long life-expectancy is associated with favourable long-term biochemical outcomes.

Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Increased age has been suggested to predict worse clinical outcomes in patients with prostate cancer. An explanation that was proposed for this observation is that it is due to inherent differences in the biological properties of prostate cancer in older men. Stage migration, prostate specific antigen and prostate biopsy pathology are variables that may confound the interpretation of age as an independent prognosticator of outcomes following radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Matched pairs analysis was performed comparing the 3 age cohorts 46 to 55, 56 to 65 and older than 65 years to a cohort of 435 patients who were 45 years or younger based on propensity scores calculated with all known preoperative variables. Postoperative clinical and pathological characteristics were compared among the 4 matched age cohorts. A Cox hazards model was used to compare time to prostate specific antigen recurrence across the different age cohorts and the actuarial risk of recurrence was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and log rank survivor analyses.

RESULTS

Younger patients showed lower grade disease (p <0.001), and lower rates of positive surgical margin rates (p = 0.035) and extraprostatic extension (p <0.001) but they did not have higher rates of lymph node involvement (p = 0.85) or seminal vesicle invasion (p = 0.56). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant differences in biochemical recurrence across the age cohorts (log rank 0.38). On multivariate analysis prostatectomy Gleason score, pathological stage, positive surgical margins (each p <0.001) and preoperative prostate specific antigen (p = 0.04) were independently predictive of biochemical recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

We report that increased age is not associated with worse biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy and it should not be considered an independent prognosticator for disease recurrence. Rather, age is a surrogate for known predictors of biochemical recurrence following surgery.

Age impact in clinicopathologic presentation and the clinical evolution of prostate cancer in patients submitted to radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of age in pathological findings and clinical evolution of prostate cancer in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred and fifty-six patients operated on between 1991 and 2000 were selected. Patients were divided into age groups of between 10 and 49 years, 50 to 59 years, 60 to 69 years and 70 to 83 years.

RESULTS

Patients having less than 60 years of age presented clinical stage (p = 0.001), PSA (p = 0.013) and biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.013) more favorable than older patients. Age groups did not show any relationship between either postoperative Gleason score or pathological stage or risk of non-confined organ disease and involvement of seminal vesicles. After a mean follow-up of 58.3 months, 149 (27%) patients presented recurrence. Patients aged between 40 and 59 years presented a disease-free survival rate significantly higher when compared to patients aged between 60 and 83 years (p = 0.022). However, when controlled with clinical stage, PSA, Gleason score and percentage of positive fragments, there was no relationship between age and biochemical recurrence risk (p = 0.426).

CONCLUSIONS

Even though younger patients presented more favorable preoperative characteristics, postoperative pathological findings and biochemical recurrence rates did not differ between studied age groups.

Biochemical disease-free survival in men younger than 60 years with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To determine the biochemical disease-free survival rates in patients 60 years old or younger who were treated with surgery for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 291 patients 60 years old or younger who had undergone radical prostatectomy as the sole primary treatment for prostate cancer. Follow-up prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were measured 6 to 8 weeks after surgery and 4 to 6 months thereafter. Biochemical failure was defined as a detectable PSA level (greater than 0.01 ng/mL). The median follow-up of the entire study group was 50 months.

RESULTS

Eighty-one percent of the patients presented with a serum PSA level of 10 ng/mL or less, and 52% had a Gleason score of less than 7 on prostate biopsy. The radical prostatectomy specimens showed organ-confined disease in 72% of patients, and 83% of tumors had a Gleason score of 7. The 1, 5, and 7-year biochemical disease-free survival rate was 99%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. The fitted multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that having a prostatectomy specimen Gleason score greater than 7 or seminal vesicle invasion or nodal disease significantly increased the risk of biochemical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In the PSA era, men with prostate cancer who are 60 years old or younger and treated with surgery have an excellent biochemical disease-free outcome.

The curative role of radiotherapy in adenocarcinoma of the prostate in patients under 55 years of age: a rare cancer network retrospective study

To determine whether radiation therapy could be an acceptable alternative to surgery in young patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, we analysed the outcome of 39 patients aged under 55 with organ confined tumours who received external radiation therapy in a curative intent. Our results suggest that similar local control in younger and older patients can be expected from either external beam radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy.

Radical retropubic prostatectomy in men younger than 45 years diagnosed during early prostate cancer detection program

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the incidence and outcome of prostate cancer in men younger than 45 years of age treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy after screening in an early prostate cancer detection program.

METHODS

Our study group comprised 19,302 men younger than 45 years old who participated in this program. The indications for prostate biopsy were a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 1.25 ng/mL or greater and a percent-free PSA value of 18% or less. Patients with prostate cancer underwent nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications, clinical and pathologic stage, Gleason score, and surgical margins were reviewed retrospectively. In addition, potency, continence, and biochemical recurrence were assessed at the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Of the study population eligible for prostate biopsy (1027 patients), only 175 (17%) consented to undergo the procedure (mean PSA 3.8 ng/mL). Twenty-eight men were diagnosed with prostate cancer, corresponding to 0.14% of the screened population and 16% of the biopsied patients. Twenty-six patients agreed to undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. Pathologic examination revealed organ-confined disease in 22 (84.6%) and extraprostatic extension in 4 (15.4%). Positive surgical margins were seen in 2 patients (7.7%). The Gleason score was 7 or greater in 11 (42.3%) and 6 or less in 15 patients (57.7%). During a mean follow-up period of 15.8 months (range 3 to 36), all patients were continent, and 13 of the 16 patients with a follow-up of 12 months or longer were potent.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large screening population younger than 45 years old, 16% of biopsied patients were positive for prostate cancer. These tumors were clinically significant but of a low stage and therefore potentially curable by surgery.

Evidence of increased prostate cancer detection in men aged 50 to 59: a review of 324,684 biopsies performed between 1995 and 2002

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the age-specific detection rate of prostate cancer diagnosed from 324,684 biopsies submitted to a single laboratory and to assess the degree of prostate cancer in younger men. The advent of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and increased prostate cancer screening has led to increased evaluations for prostate cancer. The initial stage and age at presentation in prostate cancer has shifted.

METHODS

From 1995 through 2001, all prostate biopsies submitted to the laboratory were reviewed and analyzed for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, cancer detection rate, and age at diagnosis.

RESULTS

The overall detection rate of prostate cancer increased by 15% from 29% to 34% for all biopsies submitted during the study period. For the age group 50 to 59 years, a 45% increase occurred in the detection of prostate cancer from a baseline of approximately 11% in 1995 to greater than 16% in 2001. For the age group 70 to 79 years, the detection of prostate cancer decreased from a baseline of 41% in 1995 to 36% in 2001.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in prostate cancer diagnosis among younger men in the United States has been significant. The increase is likely multifactorial and may be attributable to the impact of PSA and prostate cancer screening efforts. This has led to a greater number of younger men undergoing evaluation for prostate cancer. Thus, a heightened awareness regarding the diagnosis of prostate cancer among younger men is needed.

Long-term cancer control of radical prostatectomy in men younger than 50 years of age: update 2003

OBJECTIVES

To compare the cancer control in men younger than 50 years with that in older men treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for localized prostate cancer in a contemporary series. In the 1970s and 1980s, men younger than 50 years old represented approximately 1% of newly diagnosed prostate cancer cases. However, with the widespread use of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and increased public awareness of prostate cancer, this figure has risen (3.7% to 4%). Previous studies, mostly carried out before the PSA era, reported conflicting data with respect to cancer control for these younger men treated with RRP.

METHODS

We analyzed the data from 2897 men who underwent RRP between April 1982 and September 2001. Preoperative PSA level, clinical and pathologic stage, and biochemical recurrence were compared between 341 men younger than 50 years old and 2556 men 50 years old or older. Disease-free (PSA less than 0.2 ng/mL) survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Pathologic staging was compared using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Men younger than 50 years old had pathologic variables and 5, 10, and 15-year biochemical disease-free survival rates comparable to men aged 50 to 59 years (88%, 81%, and 69% versus 87%, 78%, and 71%, respectively). However, younger men had a lower incidence of extraprostatic extension (25% versus 31%; P <0.02), seminal vesicle involvement (2% versus 6%; P <0.03), and positive surgical margins (3% versus 9%; P <0.03), a greater organ-confined disease rate (65% versus 49%; P <0.0001), and a trend toward greater 5, 10, and 15-year biochemical disease-free survival rates, which did not reach statistical significance, compared with men aged 60 to 69 years (84%, 74%, and 67%, respectively; P <0.09). Furthermore, younger men not only had a lower rate of extraprostatic extension (25% versus 36%; P <0.001), seminal vesicle involvement (2% versus 10%; P <0.001), and positive surgical margins (3% versus 9%; P <0.001) and a greater organ-confined disease rate (65% versus 36%; P <0.0001), they also demonstrated significantly (P <0.003) greater 5, 10, and 15-year biochemical disease-free survival rates compared with men aged 70 years or older (72%, 58%, and 58%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Men diagnosed with prostate cancer who are younger than 50 years of age and are candidates for RRP tend to have a greater probability of organ-confined disease than older men. Younger men also demonstrate greater long-term cancer control rates than older men.

Advanced age at diagnosis is an independent predictor of time to death from prostate carcinoma for patients undergoing external beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Whether age at diagnosis is predictive of time to prostate carcinoma specific death after external beam radiation therapy (RT) for patients who are diagnosed with clinically localized prostate carcinoma during the prostate specific antigen (PSA) era has not been investigated previously.

METHODS

A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the ability of pretreatment risk group and age at diagnosis to predict time to all causes of death and time to death from prostate carcinoma for 381 patients who underwent RT for clinically localized prostate carcinoma.

RESULTS

Age at diagnosis, as a continuous variable (P(continuous) = 0.04), and risk group (P(categorical) = 0.02) were independent predictors of time to death from prostate carcinoma, whereas only age at diagnosis (P(continuous) = 0.01) was a predictor of time to all causes of death. When analyzed as a categorical variable, beginning at age 73 years, age at diagnosis was an independent predictor (P(categorical) < 0.04) of time to death from prostate carcinoma. Upon further analysis, this finding was limited to high-risk patients. For example, age > or = 75 years at diagnosis predicted for a shorter median time to death from prostate carcinoma (6.3 years vs. 9.7 years; P = 0.002) in high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with clinically localized, high-risk prostate carcinoma who were diagnosed at age > or = 73 years and were treated with RT had a worse prognosis compared with patients who were diagnosed age < 73 years, raising the possibility that a more aggressive prostate carcinoma biology may develop during andropause.

Clinical features of prostate cancer patients younger than 50 years: report of seven cases

BACKGROUND

The incidence of prostate cancer increases with age and latent cancer is common in older men. But clinical prostate cancer is rare in men aged < 50 years.

METHODS

Between 1988 and 2000, we studied seven cases of prostate cancer in men aged under 50 years. The clinicopathological results included: the first sign or symptom; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at the time of diagnosis; existence of abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE); the differentiation of the cancer and Gleason score; and the outcome of treatment.

RESULTS

Six cases were diagnosed as stage D2. One case was diagnosed as stage B2 and the patient underwent radical prostatectomy. None of the cases were detected by mass screening. The PSA at diagnosis was < 10 ng/mL in only one case and that patient underwent radical prostatectomy. Six cases were diagnosed pathologically as poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The only patient who survived more than 5 years underwent radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSION

Six of seven cases of prostate cancer were detected at advanced stage. Only one case was thought to be curable and this patient's cancer was detected by chance occult blood test. Because young prostate cancer patients are potential candidates for radical prostatectomy and the sensitivity of PSA might be higher in young men, high-risk groups could be screened by PSA.

Prostate cancer in men age 50 years or younger: a review of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research multicenter prostate cancer database

PURPOSE

Prostate cancer in men age 50 years or younger traditionally has accounted for approximately 1% of those diagnosed with prostate cancer. Prior studies of prostate cancer in men of this age led many clinicians to believe that they have a less favorable outcome than older men. Most of these studies were conducted before the advent of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening programs. We evaluated a surgically treated cohort of men age 50 years or younger to determine whether disease recurred more frequently among them than in those 51 to 69 years old in the PSA era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 477 men who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 1997. Age, ethnicity, preoperative PSA, clinical and pathological stage, margin and seminal vesicle involvement, and recurrence were compared between 79 men age 50 years or younger (study group) and 398, 51 to 69 years old (comparison group). Disease-free survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression techniques.

RESULTS

There were 6 (7.6%) recurrences in the study group (79) and 107 (26.9%) in the comparison group (398). The disease-free survival curves were significantly different (log-rank p = 0.010). Age remained a significant prognostic factor (Wald p = 0.033) in multivariate Cox regression analyses that controlled for race, clinical and pathological stage, and pretreatment PSA. Similar results were found when the comparison group was limited to 116 patients 51 to 59 years old (log-rank p = 0.034, Wald p = 0.069).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that patients in the PSA era who underwent radical prostatectomy and were age 50 years or younger have a more favorable disease-free outcome compared to older men.