Chromosomal anomalies in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and carcinoma of the prostate using fluorescence in situ hybridization

Benign mimics of prostate cancer

The histopathological diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma is challenged by the existence of numerous benign mimics. Most of these lesions have no clinical significance and many do not need to be reported. Their clinical relevance lies in the risk that they are misinterpreted as cancer. This review presents the histopathological features of benign mimics and discusses their distinction from cancer. The lesions that are most often misdiagnosed as cancer are atrophy and its variants, including simple atrophy, partial atrophy and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Benign proliferations are a group of lesions with crowded small glands with no or little nuclear atypia. The most problematic entity of this group is adenosis, which may have a more alarming architecture than some cancers. A diagnostic problem with atrophy and several of the benign proliferations is that the glands often have a discontinuous or absent basal cell layer. Hyperplastic and metaplastic lesions include basal cell hyperplasia. Basal cell hyperplasia may especially mimic prostate cancer with its small dark glands, variable nuclear atypia and a pseudoinfiltrative pattern, which may be present. The anatomical structure that most often causes diagnostic problems is the seminal vesicle. The mucosa of the seminal vesicle contains small acini, often with very pronounced nuclear atypia that may be misinterpreted as cancer. Pathologists need to be familiar with these mimics, as a false positive diagnosis of prostate cancer may lead to unnecessary radical treatment.

Molecular evidence supporting the precursor nature of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate is characterized by lobular proliferation of closely packed small acini. It is hypothesized that AAH is a precursor lesion for low-grade prostate cancer arising from the transition zone. Telomere dysfunction is common during malignant transformation of epithelia. In this study, we investigate telomere shortening in AAH (n = 93), high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) ( n = 68), and prostatic adenocarcinoma (PCA) ( n = 70) using quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization. Twenty percent (19 of 93) of AAH specimens, 68% (46 of 68) of HGPIN, and 83% (58 of 70) of PCA showed significant telomere shortening. Thirty-two percent of AAH lesions had α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) expression, a sensitive and specific marker for HGPIN and PCA. AMACR expression in AAH was seen more frequently in AAH foci with telomere shortening or coexisting PCA. Our findings indicate that a subset of AAH lesions have telomere shortening and AMACR expression, suggesting that these foci may be precursors for PCA.

Atypical Adenomatous Hyperplasia (Adenosis) of the Prostate: DNA Ploidy Analysis and Immunophenotype

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate is a microscopic proliferation of small acini that may be mistaken for adenocarcinoma. Although some data suggest that AAH is associated with adenocarcinoma arising in the transition zone, the clinical significance of this lesion is uncertain. Therefore we studied the DNA ploidy pattern and immunophenotype of AAH as compared with nodular hyperplasia and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma in 23 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, whole-mounted retropubic prostatectomies. Representative sections were immunostained for keratin 34β-E12, chromogranin, bcl-2, c-erbB-2, ki67-MIB1, and factor VIII (microvessel density). DNA ploidy was determined by image analysis and Feul gen-stained sections. There were rare scattered immunoreactive cells for chromogranin, bcl-2, and c-erbB-2 in nodular hyperplasia and AAH (mainly in the basal cell compartment) and in carcinoma. The ki67-MIB1 labeling index was different between nodular hyperplasia and AAH (p<0.001) and carcinoma (p=0.003) but not between AAH and carcinoma (p=0.203). Microvessel density was different between AAH and carcinoma (p=0.001) but not between nodular hyperplasia and AAH (p=0.105) or carcinoma (p=0.0820). All foci of nodular hyperplasia, AAH, and carcinoma were diploid. Ploidy status and our selected panel of antibodies did not discriminate among these 3 entities reliably.

The complexity of prostate cancer: genomic alterations and heterogeneity

Although prostate cancer is the most common malignancy to affect men in the Western world, the molecular mechanisms underlying its development and progression remain poorly understood. Like all cancers, prostate cancer is a genetic disease that is characterized by multiple genomic alterations, including point mutations, microsatellite variations, and chromosomal alterations such as translocations, insertions, duplications, and deletions. In prostate cancer, but not other carcinomas, these chromosome alterations result in a high frequency of gene fusion events. The development and application of novel high-resolution technologies has significantly accelerated the detection of genomic alterations, revealing the complex nature and heterogeneity of the disease. The clinical heterogeneity of prostate cancer can be partly explained by this underlying genetic heterogeneity, which has been observed between patients from different geographical and ethnic populations, different individuals within these populations, different tumour foci within the same patient, and different cells within the same tumour focus. The highly heterogeneous nature of prostate cancer provides a real challenge for clinical disease management and a detailed understanding of the genetic alterations in all cells, including small subpopulations, would be highly advantageous.

High-resolution genome-wide copy-number analysis suggests a monoclonal origin of multifocal prostate cancer

Many human cancers present as multifocal lesions. Understanding the clonal origin of multifocal cancers is of both etiological and clinical importance. The molecular basis of multifocal prostate cancer has previously been explored using a limited number of isolated markers and, although independent origin is widely believed, the clonal origin of multifocal prostate cancer is still debatable. We attempted to address clonal origin using a genome-wide copy-number analysis of individual cancer and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) lesions. Using Affymetrix array 6.0 copy-number analysis, we compared the genomic changes detected in 48 individual cancer and HGPIN lesions, isolated from 18 clinically localized prostate cancer cases. Identical genomic copy-number changes, shared by all same-case cancer foci, were detected in all 13 informative cases displaying multiple tumor foci. In addition, individual HGPIN lesions in the two multifocal-HGPIN cases available shared identical genomic changes. Commonly known genomic alterations, including losses at 6q15, 8p21.3-8p21.2, 10q23.2-10q23.31, 16q22.3, 16q23.2-16q23.3 and 21q22.2-21q22.3 regions and gain of 8q24.3 were the most frequently detected changes in this study and each was detected in all same-case foci in at least one case. Microarray data were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization in selected foci. Our high-resolution genome-wide copy-number data suggest that many multifocal cases derive from a single prostate cancer precursor clone and that this precursor may give rise to separate HGPIN foci and may further progress to multifocal invasive prostate cancer. These findings, which demonstrate the monoclonal origin of multifocal prostate cancer, should significantly enhance our understanding of prostate carcinogenesis.

Focal therapy for localised prostate cancer: are we asking the correct research questions?

The goals of focal therapy are laudable, namely reducing morbidity of treatment while ensuring at least equivalent oncological outcomes when compared with established interventions for localised prostate cancer, e.g. RP and external beam radiotherapy. While progress has been made towards better identifying the index lesion in these patients, there is much yet to be done to establish the validity of the index lesion theory as the metastatic focus and to establish that current targeting and ablative platforms are adequate to deliver the goals outlined above. The correct research questions have not yet been asked to establish either of these key principles underpinning focal therapy for localised prostate cancer.

Differences in the structural features of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and low-grade prostatic adenocarcinoma

Aim

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) is a small glandular proliferation that has histological similarities with Gleason grade 1 and 2 prostatic adenocarcinoma (PACG1,2). There are no distinct histomorphological criteria distinguishing these two lesions from each other and other small glandular proliferations. Because treatment approaches are different for these lesions, it is necessary to determine histological criteria. The aim of this study is to review the histological features of these two lesions and to define new histological criteria distinguishing AAH from PACG1,2. We, therefore, assessed 18 anatomical and structural parameters.

Materials and Methods

We found 11 AAH (22 foci) and 15 PACG1,2 (22 foci) cases in 105 radical prostatectomy specimens. Basal cell-specific antikeratin was applied to these lesions. We assumed that PACG1,2 lesions did have not basal cells and we grouped the lesions as AAH and PACG1,2 based on this assumption.

Results

We found differences between AAH and PACG1,2 lesions for some parameters including the number of glands, structures such as the main ductus and basal cells. We found similar properties in the two lesions for the following parameters: localization, multiplicity, diameter of the lesion, focus asymmetry, distance between glands, inflammatory cells in and out of the lesions, secretory cell shape on the luminal side, papillary projection towards the luminal side of gland, the shape of the outer gland, the infiltrative pattern of the gland, glandular pleomorphism, biggest gland diameter and median gland diameter.

Conclusion

We determined that concurrent evaluation of histomorphological features was important to differentiate between AAH and PACG1,2.

Hormone escape is associated with genomic instability in a human prostate cancer model

Lack of hormone dependency in prostate cancers is an irreversible event that occurs through generation of genomic instability induced by androgen deprivation. Indeed, the cytogenetic profile of hormone-dependent (HD) prostate cancer remains stable as long as it received a hormone supply, whereas the profile of hormone-independent (HID) variants acquired new and various alterations. This is demonstrated here using a HD xenografted model of a human prostate cancer, PAC120, transplanted for 11 years into male nude mice and 4 HID variants obtained by surgical castration. Cytogenetic analysis, done by karyotype, FISH, CGH and array-CGH, shows that PAC120 at early passage presents numerous chromosomal alterations. Very few additional alterations were found between the 5th and 47th passages, indicating the stability of the parental tumor. HID variants largely maintained the core of chromosomal alterations of PAC120 - losses at 6q, 7p, 12q, 15q and 17q sites. However, each HID variant displayed a number of new alterations, almost all being specific to each variant and very few shared by all. None of the HID had androgen receptor mutations. Our study indicates that hormone castration is responsible for genomic instability generating new cytogenetic abnormalities susceptible to alter the properties of cancer cell associated with tumor progression, such as increased cell survival and ability to metastasize.

Precursor lesions to prostatic adenocarcinoma

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the one well-documented precursor to adenocarcinoma of the prostate. This review article defines both low- and high-grade PIN. Unusual variants of high-grade PIN are illustrated. Benign lesions that may be confused with high-grade PIN, including central zone histology, clear cell cribriform hyperplasia, and basal cell hyperplasia are described and illustrated. High-grade PIN is also differentiated from invasive acinar (usual) and ductal adenocarcinoma. The incidence of high-grade PIN, its relationship to carcinoma (including molecular findings), and risk of cancer on rebiopsy are covered in detail. Finally, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate, a controversial entity, is discussed and differentiated from high-grade PIN.

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis) of the prostate: a case report with review of the literature

A 62-year-old male presented with symptoms of urinary obstruction and elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level of 3.61 ng/mL. Prostate needle biopsies showed benign prostatic tissue with a focus of crowded glands with minimal cytological atypia, fairly well-circumscribed with infiltrative appearance of glands at the edges. This focus had both small and larger glands with similar histological features. This focus was strongly positive for alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A-racemase (AMACR), but showed scattered patchy staining with basal cell markers (p63 and CK903/34betaE12). Hence, the final histologic diagnosis was benign prostatic tissue with a focus of florid adenosis. Two subsequent follow-up prostate needle biopsies performed six and 12 months later both showed benign prostatic tissue with atrophic changes. This case highlights the utility of these three immunostains (AMACR, p63 and CK903/34betaE12) in the accurate diagnosis of adenosis of the prostate on needle biopsy, and avoiding its misinterpretation as prostate adenocarcinoma.

Mechanisms of Disease: high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and other proposed preneoplastic lesions in the prostate

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is the most likely precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma according to virtually all available evidence. This lesion is characterized by cellular proliferations within pre-existing ducts and acini, with nuclear and nucleolar enlargements similar to those seen in prostate cancer, although unlike cancer HGPIN retains a basal-cell layer. The recognition of HGPIN is clinically important because of the strong association between this disease and prostatic carcinoma. The predictive value for cancer of an initial diagnosis of HGPIN on needle biopsy has substantially declined, with values falling from 36% to 21%. A major factor contributing to this decline is related to increased use of needle biopsy core sampling, which has provided the means for many cancers associated with HGPIN to be detected on initial biopsy; repeat biopsy, even with good sampling, does not detect many additional cancers. Other possible findings in the prostate might indicate premalignant disease (low-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, atrophy, malignancy-associated changes, and atypical adenomatous hyperplasia or adenosis), but the data for these premalignant diseases are much less convincing than those for HGPIN.

Associations among benign prostate hypertrophy, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and latent carcinoma of the prostate

AIM

To investigate the frequency of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and its associations with benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH) and latent histological carcinoma of the prostate (LPC) in autopsy material.

METHODS

Two hundred and twelve prostate specimens obtained from autopsy material were subjected to whole mount analysis in an attempt to investigate the associations among BPH, AAH and LPC.

RESULTS

Most histological carcinomas and AAH lesions were found in enlarged prostates with intense hypertrophy. No statistically significant relation was found between BPH and the main characteristics of LPC, such as tumor volume, histological differentiation and biological behavior. Our data regarding multi-focal tumors showed a tendency for multi-focal carcinomas to develop in larger prostates, and a tendency of AAH lesions to develop in larger prostates. No statistically significant relation was found between AAH and LPC.

CONCLUSION

There seems not any causative aetiopathogenetical or topographical relation between AAH lesions and prostate adenocarcinoma. AAH lesion seems to be a well-defined mimicker of prostatic adenocarcinoma, and the reported association of AAH with prostatic carcinoma could probably be an epiphenomenon.

Evidence of multifocality of telomere erosion in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HPIN) and concurrent carcinoma

Mechanisms underlying prostate cancer (CaP) initiation and progression are poorly understood. A chromosomal instability mechanism leading to the generation of numerical and structural chromosomal changes has been implicated in the preneoplastic and neoplastic stages of CaP. Telomere dysfunction is one potential mechanism associated with the onset of such instability. To determine whether there was alteration in telomere length and chromosome number, 15 paraffin-embedded prostatectomy specimens were investigated using quantitative peptide nucleic acid (PNA) FISH analysis of representative foci of carcinoma, putative precancerous lesions (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, HPIN) and nondysplastic prostate epithelium. A significant decrease in telomere length was shown in both HPIN and CaP in comparison with normal epithelium. In addition, elevated rates of aneusomy suggested that increased levels of chromosomal aberrations were associated with decreased telomere length. Moreover, multiple foci of HPIN were shown to have a heterogeneous overall reduction of telomere length. This reduction was more evident in the histologic regions of the prostate containing CaP. Such observations lend support to the hypothesis that telomere erosion may be a consistent feature of CaP oncogenesis and may also be associated with the generation of chromosomal instability that characterizes this malignancy.

Expression of alpha-Methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) in atypical adenomatous hyperplasia of the prostate

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate, also known as adenosis, is characterized by a proliferation of prostatic glands with abnormal architectural patterns, but without significant cytologic atypia. In some cases it may be difficult to distinguish AAH from prostatic carcinoma. Additionally, it is not clear whether AAH is a precursor lesion of prostatic adenocarcinoma. P504S, a protein highly expressed in prostatic adenocarcinoma, has been recently shown to be a marker of prostate cancer. The goal of this study is to examine the expression of P504S in AAH by immunohistochemistry. A total of 80 prostate specimens, including 40 cases of AAH (prostatectomy N = 30, biopsy N = 6, transurethral resection N = 4), 20 cases of prostatic adenocarcinomas, and 20 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia, were studied. Immunohistochemistry for a prostate cancer marker alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (P504S) and a basal cell-specific marker 34betaE12 was performed in all the cases. The 34betaE12 stain confirmed the presence of patchy basal cells in all 40 cases of AAH. P504S was undetectable in the majority of AAHs (33 of 40, 82.5%), focally expressed in four of 40 (10.0%), or diffusely positive only in three of 40 (7.5%) cases of AAH. Interestingly, two of seven P504S-positive AAHs were found adjacent to adenocarcinoma. In contrast, all benign prostatic hyperplasias (20 of 20, 100%) were negative for P504S, and all 20 cases of prostatic carcinomas (100%) showed a diffuse P504S staining pattern. These findings suggest that AAH is a heterogenous entity. The biologic significance of P504S expression in a small subset of AAH remains to be determined. Because most cases of AAH are negative for P504S, immunostaining of P504S is also of diagnostic value in distinguishing the majority of AAHs from prostatic adenocarcinoma.

New concepts in the pathology of prostatic epithelial carcinogenesis

The development of drugs to prevent prostate cancer is underway, yet monitoring the potential efficacy of these agents during clinical trials relies on measuring intermediate endpoints. In this review, various candidate markers are presented that are under different stages of evaluation as intermediate endpoint biomarkers. In addition, the near future will bring an unprecedented wave of new potential biomarkers. For instance, through genomics-based methods many new genes are being discovered whose altered expression may be involved in different phases of prostate cancer development and progression. In the development of rational approaches for selecting which of these untested biomarkers may be useful to measure systematically, there must be an improved understanding of the mechanisms of prostatic carcinogenesis. We submit that this improved understanding will come through new knowledge of the biology of normal prostate epithelial cells, the determination of the precise target cells of transformation, and how their growth regulation is genetically and epigenetically perturbed during the phases of initiation and progression. In this review, therefore, we also present our recent immune-mediated oxidant injury and regeneration hypothesis of why and how the prostate is targeted for carcinogenesis.

Cell proliferation, apoptosis, oncogene, and tumor suppressor gene status in adenosis with comparison to benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and cancer

There is scant information on the cell proliferation, apoptosis, oncogenes, and tumor suppressor genes status in adenosis. Forty-eight foci of adenosis were studied with immunohistochemistry for MIB-1; c-erbB-2, c-erbB-3, bcl-2 oncogenes; and p53. To evaluate apoptosis, the TdT dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) method was applied. Results were compared with the same studies on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) (n = 20), low-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) (n = 10); high-grade PIN (n = 20), Gleason sum 2 to 6 cancer (n = 16); and Gleason sum 7 to 10 cancer (n = 22). MIB-1 proliferation index was lowest in BPH, followed by adenosis, low-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), low-grade cancer, high-grade PIN, and high-grade cancer. The apoptotic rate was generally low in all groups, although it was higher in PIN and cancer. In BPH and adenosis, bcl-2 was absent in luminal cells. In low- and high-grade PIN, both basal and luminal cells expressed bcl-2, whereas in cancer, expression was found in only 1 case (3%). C-erbB-2 showed absent or low values for cancer and adenosis, whereas it was commonly expressed in BPH and low- and high-grade PIN. Low expression in adenosis was also found with c-erbB-3 (6%) compared with all other groups. Expression of p53 was confined to cancer. Despite a significantly higher proliferation index rate compared with BPH, adenosis showed a markedly lower proliferating index when compared with low-grade PIN, high-grade PIN, and cancer. Expression of the oncogenes c-erbB-2 and cerbB-3 was very low in adenosis, and the staining pattern for bcl-2 was similar to that of BPH. These results provide additional evidence to that of prior studies that adenosis is a histological small acinar proliferation more akin to BPH than high-grade PIN or adenocarcinoma.

Genetic analysis of prostatic atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (adenosis)

Atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) of the prostate, a small glandular proliferation, is a putative precursor lesion to prostate cancer, in particular to the subset of well-differentiated carcinomas that arise in the transition zone, the same region where AAH lesions most often occur. Several morphological characteristics of AAH suggest a relationship to cancer; however, no definitive evidence has been reported. In this study, we analyzed DNA from 25 microdissected AAH lesions for allelic imbalance as compared to matched normal DNA, using one marker each from chromosome arms 1q, 6q, 7q, 10q, 13q, 16q, 17p, 17q, and 18q, and 19 markers from chromosome 8p. We observed 12% allelic imbalance, with loss only within chromosome 8p11-12. These results suggest that genetic alterations in transition zone AAH lesions may be infrequent. This genotypic profile of AAH will allow for comparisons with well-differentiated carcinomas in the transition zone of the prostate.

HER-2/neu gene amplification status in prostate cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization

HER-2/neu expression has been established as a prognostic factor in breast and other cancers. In prostate cancer (PC), a similar predictive role has been hindered by variable immunohistochemical (IHC) results. The authors studied DNA amplification of the HER-2/neu gene on 4-microm sections obtained from 62 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded PCs by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The results were compared with HER-2/neu protein expression as determined by IHC and correlated by logistic regression analysis with Gleason tumor grade, DNA ploidy, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA), and pathological stage. The HER-2/neu gene was localized using the Oncor (Gaithersburg, MD) digoxigenin-labeled unique sequence probe. Amplified PCs had at least 20 malignant cells, with 5 or more copies of the sequence. Amplification of HER-2/neu correlated with Gleason score (P = .0001). The mean Gleason score of unamplified tumors was 5.7 and that of amplified tumors was 7.5. Nondiploid tumors had a significantly greater rate of HER-2/neu amplification compared with diploid tumors (P = .0003). Of the 62 cases evaluated by IHC and FISH, 18 cases (29%) were overexpressed by IHC, and 27 cases (44%) were amplified by FISH. A trend for similar HER-2/neu status in each PC by the two methods did not reach statistical significance (P = .23). HER-2/neu amplification by FISH was associated with advanced pathological stage; however, this relationship reached only near-statistical significance (P = .06). There was no correlation of HER-2/neu amplification by FISH with patient age or preoperative serum PSA levels. The authors conclude that HER-2/neu gene amplification status can be determined by FISH on archival prostate cancer specimens, significantly correlates with high tumor grade and nondiploid DNA content, and is more frequently encountered in tumors with advanced pathological stage. Also, FISH is more sensitive than IHC for detection of abnormalities in the HER-2/neu gene, and further studies should be undertaken to determine whether a FISH-based HER-2/neu detection method may prove of importance in the prediction of prognosis and planning of therapy in prostate cancer patients.

Interphase cytogenetics of prostate cancer: fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis of Japanese cases

No numerical aberration of chromosomes that might be specific for prostate cancer has so far been established. We used fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with centromere-specific probes for chromosomes 7, 8, 17, X and Y to establish the distribution of centromere copy numbers in frozen-stored or freshly prepared samples of benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH) and to detect numerical aberrations of these chromosomes in 28 prostate cancers from Japanese men. There was no significant difference in the data of centromere copy numbers between fresh and frozen-stored tissue. The most common aberration in prostate cancers was a gain of chromosome 8 (57%), with numerical aberration of chromosome 7 being the second most frequent anomaly (50%). Numerical aberration of chromosome 7 is most significantly associated with a higher Gleason score (GS) (P < 0.005) or with lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001). Numerical aberration of several chromosomes, including chromosomes 7 and/or 8, was common in aggressive prostate cancers. Loss of chromosome Y was detected in only 4% of cases. FISH analysis thus proved to be a useful method for detecting numerical aberrations of individual chromosomes, with application to touch preparations of frozen-stored tissue having the advantage of exact sampling of cancer foci. The results suggest that numerical aberration of chromosome 7 is associated with aggressive tumour behaviour and poor prognosis of patients with prostate cancer. The association between genetic change and chromosomal abnormality should be studied in detail.