Body mass index from the RE-LY trial: further evidence of the obesity paradox

Background

The obesity paradox has been reported in 3 post-hoc analyses evaluating the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) against warfarin (W): apixaban (ARISTOTLE), rivaroxaban (ROCKET), and edoxaban (ENGAGE-AF).

Purpose

To evaluate the obesity paradox in a post-hoc analysis of the RE-LY trial, comparing dabigatran 110 mg BID (D110), 150 mg BID (D150), and W by body mass index (BMI).

Methods

Baseline characteristics were evaluated using World Health Organization (WHO) criteria of overweight and obese (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) and under and normal weight (BMI <25 kg/m2). Stroke and systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, major bleeding, mortality, and intracranial hemorrhage were evaluated using BMI as a continuous variable and by the WHO criteria using a cox proportional hazard model.

Results

BMI was available in 99.9% of patients randomized; 74% had a BMI ≥25. At baseline, patients with a BMI ≥25 were younger (70.9 vs 73.1, p<0.001) and had fewer prior strokes (11.5% vs 15.6%, p<0.001), but higher mean creatinine clearance (78.3 vs 57.0, p<0.001) and rates of diabetes (25.8% vs 16.1%, p<0.001) (Table 1). Independent of drug assignment, patients with a BMI ≥25 had lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism (HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.54–0.79], p<0.001), ischemic stroke (0.75 [95% CI 0.60, 0.94], p=0.01), major bleeding (HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.69,0.89], p<0.001), mortality (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.53, 0.67], p<0.001) and intracranial hemorrhage (HR 0.53 [95% CI 0.38, 0.73], p<0.001) compared to those with a BMI <25. Using BMI as a continuous variable combining all outcomes at 3 years, endpoint rates declined as BMI approached 25 in all 3 treatment groups. The exceptions were intracranial hemorrhage for D110 and D150 and stroke in D150 patients, where rates were low independent of BMI. No significant interaction between BMI and treatment was observed in individual outcomes except for the D110 vs. D150 comparison for major bleeding, in favor of D110 for patients with BMI ≥25 (HR 0.77 [95% CI 0.65, 0.91] and HR 1.12 [95% CI 0.86, 1.47], interaction p=0.0190).

Conclusions

In RE-LY, independent of drug assignment, patients with a higher BMI had improved outcomes, demonstrating the obesity paradox. As BMI increased towards 25, outcome rates improved except for intracranial hemorrhage rates for both D110 and D150 and ischemic stroke rates for D150, which were low independent of BMI. Patients treated with D110 with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 had significantly lower rates of bleeding compared to D150.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): Sharpe Strumia Foundation

Defining the role of neutrophils in the lung during infection: Implications for tuberculosis disease

Neutrophils are implicated in the pathogenesis of many diseases involving inflammation. Neutrophils are also critical to host defence and have a key role in the innate immune response to infection. Despite their efficiencies against a wide range of pathogens however, their ability to contain and combat Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in the lung remains uncertain and contentious. The host response to Mtb infection is very complex, involving the secretion of various cytokines and chemokines from a wide variety of immune cells, including neutrophils, macrophages, monocytes, T cells, B cells, NK cells and dendritic cells. Considering the contributing role neutrophils play in the advancement of many diseases, understanding how an inflammatory microenvironment affects neutrophils, and how neutrophils interact with other immune cells, particularly in the context of the infected lung, may aid the design of immunomodulatory therapies. In the current review, we provide a brief overview of the mechanisms that underpin pathogen clearance by neutrophils and discuss their role in the context of Mtb and non-Mtb infection. Next, we examine the current evidence demonstrating how neutrophils interact with a range of human and non-human immune cells and how these interactions can differentially prime, activate and alter a repertoire of neutrophil effector functions. Furthermore, we discuss the metabolic pathways employed by neutrophils in modulating their response to activation, pathogen stimulation and infection. To conclude, we highlight knowledge gaps in the field and discuss plausible novel drug treatments that target host neutrophil metabolism and function which could hold therapeutic potential for people suffering from respiratory infections.

Dynamic biomarker and imaging changes from a phase II study of pre- and post-surgical sunitinib

OBJECTIVE

To explore translational biological and imaging biomarkers for sunitinib treatment before and after debulking nephrectomy in the NeoSun (European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database [EudraCT] number: 2005-004502-82) single-centre, single-arm, single-agent, Phase II trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) received 50 mg once daily sunitinib for 12 days pre-surgically, then post-surgery on 4 week-on, 2 week-off, repeating 6-week cycles until disease progression in a single arm phase II trial. Structural and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnet resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and research blood sampling were performed at baseline and after 12 days. Computed tomography imaging was performed at baseline and post-surgery then every two cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors [RECIST]) excluding the resected kidney. Secondary endpoints included changes in DCE-MRI of the tumour following pre-surgery sunitinib, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response duration, surgical morbidity/mortality, and toxicity. Translational and imaging endpoints were exploratory.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients received pre-surgery sunitinib, 71% (10/14) took the planned 12 doses. All underwent nephrectomy, and 13 recommenced sunitinib postoperatively. In all, 58.3% (seven of 12) of patients achieved partial or complete response (PR or CR) (95% confidence interval 27.7-84.8%). The median OS was 33.7 months and median PFS was 15.7 months. Amongst those achieving a PR or CR, the median response duration was 8.7 months. No unexpected surgical complications, sunitinib-related toxicities, or surgical delays occurred. Within the translational endpoints, pre-surgical sunitinib significantly increased necrosis, and reduced cluster of differentiation-31 (CD31), Ki67, circulating vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), and transfer constant (KTrans , measured using DCE-MRI; all P < 0.05). There was a trend for improved OS in patients with high baseline plasma VEGF-C expression (P = 0.02). Reduction in radiological tumour volume after pre-surgical sunitinib correlated with high percentage of solid tumour components at baseline (Spearman's coefficient ρ = 0.69, P = 0.02). Conversely, the percentage tumour volume reduction correlated with lower baseline percentage necrosis (coefficient = -0.51, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant studies such as the NeoSun can safely and effectively explore translational biological and imaging endpoints.

MET-PREVENT: metformin to improve physical performance in older people with sarcopenia and physical prefrailty/frailty - protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled proof-of-concept trial

INTRODUCTION

Skeletal muscle dysfunction is central to both sarcopenia and physical frailty, which are associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes including falls and fractures, longer hospital stays, dependency and the need for care. Resistance training may prevent and treat sarcopenia and physical frailty, but not everyone can or wants to exercise. Finding alternatives is critical to alleviate the burden of adverse outcomes associated with sarcopenia and physical frailty. This trial will provide proof-of-concept evidence as to whether metformin can improve physical performance in older people with sarcopenia and physical prefrailty or frailty.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MET-PREVENT is a parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept trial. Trial participants can participate from their own homes, including completing informed consent and screening assessments. Eligible participants with low grip strength or prolonged sit-to-stand time together with slow walk speed will be randomised to either oral metformin hydrochloride 500 mg tablets or matched placebo, taken three times a day for 4 months. The recruitment target is 80 participants from two secondary care hospitals in Newcastle and Gateshead, UK. Local primary care practices will act as participant identification centres. Randomisation will be performed using a web-based minimisation system with a random element, balancing on sex and baseline walk speed. Participants will be followed up for 4 months post-randomisation, with outcomes collected at baseline and 4 months. The primary outcome measure is the four metre walk speed at the 4-month follow-up visit.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the Liverpool NHS Research Ethics Committee (20/NW/0470), the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority (EudraCT 2020-004023-16) and the UK Health Research Authority (IRAS 275219). Results will be made available to participants, their families, patients with sarcopenia, the public, regional and national clinical teams, and the international scientific community.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN29932357.

POS0512 ANTI-CITRULLINATED PROTEIN ANTIBODY SEROSTATUS DETERMINES 2-YEAR RETENTION OF IV AND SC ABATACEPT IN PATIENTS WITH RA IN A REAL-WORLD SETTING

Background

A treat-to-target approach for RA management is recommended.1,2 However, up to half of patients discontinue DMARD treatment within 18 months.2 Predictive biomarkers, such as anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and RF, may be useful to stratify patients to the most appropriate treatment. ACTION (AbataCepT In rOutiNe clinical practice; NCT02109666) and ASCORE (Abatacept SubCutaneOus in Routine Clinical PracticE; NCT02090556) were 2-year, international, observational, prospective, multicenter studies of IV and SC abatacept, respectively, for the treatment of RA in routine clinical practice.3,4 Higher retention has been previously reported in patients with double ACPA/RF seropositive RA compared with double ACPA/RF seronegative RA.3,4

Objectives

To assess the independent effect of ACPA or RF single seropositivity on abatacept retention in patients with RA receiving abatacept in a post hoc analysis of ACTION and ASCORE.

Methods

This post hoc analysis included patients aged ≥ 18 years, with active moderate-to-severe RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) who initiated IV (body weight–adjusted dosing) or SC (125 mg once weekly) abatacept.3,4 Patients were stratified by baseline ACPA/RF status: ACPA+/RF− (ACPA+ only), ACPA/RF double positive (+/+), ACPA−/RF+ (RF+ only), and ACPA/RF double negative (−/−). Abatacept retention rate at 2 years was estimated by Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis.

Results

Patients with ACPA/RF serostatus data from the ACTION and ASCORE studies (N = 1679 and N = 1748, respectively) were evaluated. Baseline demographic and disease characteristics were similar across studies and serostatus groups (Table 1). In patients with ACPA+ only RA, abatacept retention rates were similar to the +/+ group and greater than the RF+ only and −/− groups (Figure 1). In ASCORE (Figure 1A), retention rates were significantly higher in ACPA+ only and +/+ groups when compared with the −/− group. In contrast, retention rates for patients with RF+ only RA were not significantly different vs −/− patients. Results were similar in ACTION, although the higher retention in the ACPA+ group did not reach statistical significance (Figure 1B).

Table 1.

Baseline demographics and disease characteristics by ACPA/RF status for the ASCORE and ACTION studies

ASCORE+/+RF+ onlyACPA+ only−/−(n = 1079)(n = 142)(n = 184)(n = 343)Age, years57.1 (12.8)58.2 (11.8)57.4 (13.5)57.8 (13.9)DAS28 (CRP)4.7 (1.2)4.6 (1.1)4.4 (1.0)4.8 (1.2)CDAI26.6 (12.5)25.8 (12.0)23.6 (10.9)28.2 (13.2)SDAI28.1 (13.0)27.2 (12.4)24.4 (10.8)29.7 (13.9)ACTION+/+RF+ onlyACPA+ only−/−(n = 1028)(n = 161)(n = 98)(n = 392)Age, years58.2 (12.0)58.4 (13.4)58.5 (14.0)57.0 (13.3)DAS28 (CRP)4.9 (1.1)5.0 (1.1)4.9 (1.0)5.0 (1.1)CDAI28.7 (12.2)29.2 (12.4)28.7 (11.5)30.1 (12.9)SDAI30.4 (13.1)31.2 (13.4)29.8 (11.5)31.7 (13.4)

Data are mean (SD). Patients with missing data for baseline ACPA/RF status are excluded.

Conclusion

In this post hoc analysis of the real-world ACTION and ASCORE studies, ACPA positivity was associated with an increased likelihood of retention over 2 years. Patients with ACPA+ only RA were equally as likely to be retained on abatacept as patients with ACPA/RF double positivity. In contrast, patients with RF+ only RA were less likely to be retained on abatacept over 2 years. These findings suggest that ACPA positivity played a more important role than RF positivity in abatacept retention. The higher retention seen in patients with ACPA+ only vs RF+ only disease demonstrates the key role of ACPA in RA and supports the importance of precision medicine in treating patients.

References

[1]Fraenkel L, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021;73:924–39.

[2]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:685–99.

[3]Alten R, et al. Clin Rheumatol 2019;38:1413–24.

[4]Alten R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80(suppl 1):OP0180.

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. Medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Fiona Boswell, PhD, of Caudex, and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Study management provided by Syneos (CRO).

Disclosure of Interests

Rieke Alten Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Paid instructor for: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Christiane Rauch Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Melanie Chartier Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, M.T. Nurmohamed Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Maya H Buch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Consultant of: AbbVie, Galapagos, Gilead, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Gilead, Pfizer, UCB, Peter Peichl Speakers bureau: GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Xavier Mariette Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Yusuf Patel: None declared, Sara Marsal Speakers bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Novartis - Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Galapagos, Pfizer, Sanofi; IMIDomics (executive role), Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis - Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Fresenius-Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB, Hedley Griffiths Consultant of: Amgen, Raimón Sanmartí Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Bettina Bannert Speakers bureau: Novartis Pharma Schweiz AG, Yedid Elbez Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Signifience, Karissa Lozenski Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb.

POS0107 ACPA POSITIVITY DETERMINES REMISSION IN PATIENTS WITH RA TREATED WITH IV AND SC ABATACEPT: A POST HOC ANALYSIS OF THE REAL-WORLD OBSERVATIONAL ACTION AND ASCORE STUDIES

Background

The goal of treatment for RA is achieving low disease activity and/or remission1,2; however, disease course and management can be complicated by additional factors that may be influenced by serostatus. Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and RF contribute to a more severe RA disease pattern3 and may be useful in predicting response to treatment.4 ACTION (AbataCepT In rOutiNe clinical practice; NCT02109666) and ASCORE (Abatacept SubCutaneOus in Routine Clinical PracticE; NCT02090556) were 2-year, international, observational, prospective, multicenter studies of IV and SC abatacept, respectively, for the treatment of RA in routine clinical practice.4,5 Previous analyses have shown that ACPA/RF double-positive serostatus was associated with better treatment outcomes compared with ACPA/RF double-negative serostatus.4–6

Objectives

To assess the independent effect of ACPA or RF single seropositivity among patients with RA on achieving remission after treatment with abatacept for 2 years, and to compare outcomes among patients with single versus double serostatus.

Methods

This post hoc analysis included patients from ACTION and ASCORE who initiated IV (body weight–adjusted dosing) or SC abatacept (125 mg once weekly), respectively. Patients were stratified by baseline ACPA/RF status: ACPA+/RF− (ACPA+ only), ACPA/RF double positive (+/+), ACPA−/RF+ (RF+ only), and ACPA/RF double negative (−/−). DAS28 (CRP) and CDAI remission rates (defined as < 2.6 and 0–2.8, respectively) at 2 years for patients who were ACPA+ or RF+ only at baseline were assessed and compared with those who were +/+ and −/−. Patients with missing baseline ACPA/RF status were excluded. Last observation carried forward efficacy analyses were used to impute missing values.

Results

This analysis included 1679 patients from ACTION (ACPA+ only, n = 98; +/+, n = 1028; RF+ only, n = 161; and −/−, n = 392) and 1748 patients from ASCORE (ACPA+ only, n = 184; +/+, n = 1079; RF+ only, n = 142; and −/−, n = 343). Across studies and serogroups, baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar (data not shown). In both ACTION and ASCORE, a higher proportion of patients who were only ACPA+ achieved DAS28 (CRP) and CDAI remission at 2 years compared with patients who were only RF+ (Figure 1). Additionally, a similar proportion of patients who were only ACPA+ achieved DAS28 (CRP) and CDAI remission at 2 years compared with patients who were +/+. In contrast, a lower proportion of patients who were only RF+ achieved DAS28 (CRP) and CDAI remission at 2 years compared with patients who were +/+.

Conclusion

In this post hoc analysis of real-world data from ACTION and ASCORE, ACPA positivity was associated with an increased likelihood of achieving DAS28 (CRP) and CDAI remission at 2 years. Patients who were ACPA+ only were as likely to achieve remission as +/+ patients, suggesting that RF serostatus had less influence than ACPA serostatus on remission status at 2 years. In line with this, patients who were RF+ only were less likely to achieve remission at 2 years. This is the first large, real-world study to show that ACPA positivity plays a more important role than RF positivity in achieving remission whilst on abatacept. These results highlight the importance of assessing baseline ACPA status when considering treatment options for patients with RA.

References

[1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:685–99.

[2]Fraenkel L, et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2021;73:924–39.

[3]Katchamart, W, et al. Rheumatol Int 2015;35:1693–9.

[4]Alten R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2021;80(suppl 1):OP0180.

[5]Alten R, et al. Clin Rheumatol 2019;38:1413–24.

[6]Alten R, et al. RMD Open 2017;3:e000345.

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb. Medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Rachel Rankin, PhD, of Caudex, and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. Study management provided by Syneos (CRO).

Disclosure of Interests

Rieke Alten Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Paid instructor for: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Christiane Rauch Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Melanie Chartier Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, M.T. Nurmohamed Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Maya H Buch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Consultant of: AbbVie, Galapagos, Gilead, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Gilead, Pfizer, UCB, Peter Peichl Speakers bureau: Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, Xavier Mariette Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Yusuf Patel: None declared, Sara Marsal Speakers bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Novartis - Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Consultant of: AbbVie, Galapagos, Pfizer, Sanofi; IMIDomics (executive role), Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis - Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Fresenius-Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB, Hedley Griffiths Consultant of: Amgen, Raimón Sanmartí Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Bettina Bannert: None declared, Yedid Elbez Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Signifience, Karissa Lozenski Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb

POS0104 ACPA-NEGATIVE AND ACPA-POSITIVE RA-PATIENTS ACHIEVING DISEASE RESOLUTION DEMONSTRATE DISTINCT PATTERNS OF MRI-DETECTED JOINT-INFLAMMATION

Background

Sustained DMARD-free remission (SDFR), the sustained absence of clinical-synovitis after DMARD-discontinuation, is increasingly achievable in RA. However, prevalence differs significantly between ACPA-negative (40%) and ACPA-positive RA (5-10%). In addition, early-DAS-remission (DAS4months<1.6) associates with SDFR in ACPA-negative RA but not in ACPA-positive RA.1 Based on these differences, we hypothesized that longitudinal patterns of local tissue-inflammation (synovitis/tenosynovitis/osteitis) might also differ between ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive RA-patients achieving SDFR.

Objectives

With the ultimate aim to increase understanding of disease-resolution in RA, we studied MRI-detected joint-inflammation over time in relation to SDFR-development in ACPA-negative RA and ACPA-positive RA.

Methods

198 RA-patients (94 ACPA-negative and 104 ACPA-positive) underwent repeated MRIs (0/4/12/24-months) and were followed on SDFR-development. The course of MRI-detected total-inflammation, and synovitis/tenosynovitis/osteitis individually, were compared between RA-patients who did and did not achieve SDFR, using Poisson-mixed-models. 170 ACPA-positive RA-patients from the AVERT-1 were studied as ACPA-positive validation-population.

Results

In ACPA-negative RA, patients achieving SDFR had similar baseline total inflammation-levels, which declined 2.0-times stronger in the first-year of DMARD-treatment (IRR 0.50, 95%CI;0.32-0.77, p<0.01) compared to patients without SDFR. This stronger decline was seen in tenosynovitis/synovitis/osteitis. In contrast, ACPA-positive RA-patients achieving SDFR, had already lower inflammation-levels (especially synovitis/osteitis) at disease-presentation (IRR 0.45, 95%CI;0.24-0.86, p=0.02) compared to non-SDFR patients, and remained lower during follow-up (p=0.02). Similar results were found in the ACPA-positive validation-population.

Conclusion

Compared to RA-patients without disease-resolution, ACPA-positive RA-patients achieving SDFR have less severe joint-inflammation from diagnosis onwards, whilst ACPA-negative RA-patients present with similar inflammation-levels but demonstrate a stronger decline in the first year of DMARD-therapy. These different trajectories suggest that mechanisms underlying resolution of RA-chronicity in both RA-subsets might be different and indicates the relevance of the total inflammatory-load in ACPA-positive-RA.

References

[1]Verstappen M, Niemantsverdriet E, Matthijssen XME, le Cessie S, van der Helm-van Mil AHM. Early DAS response after DMARD-start increases probability of achieving sustained DMARD-free remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020 Nov 23;22(1):276.

Figure 1.

Patterns of MRI-detected joint-inflammation in RA-patients achieving SDFR compared to those who did not, stratified for ACPA-status

Disclosure of Interests

Marloes Verstappen: None declared, Xanthe Matthijssen: None declared, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Dr. Sean E. Connolly, Ph.D. is a shareholder of Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Dr. Sean E. Connolly, Ph.D. is an employee of Bristol Myers Squibb, Michael A Maldonado Shareholder of: Dr. M. Maldonado, Ph.D. is a shareholder of Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Dr. M. Maldonado, Ph.D. is an employee of Bristol Myers Squibb, Thomas Huizinga Speakers bureau: Tom WJ Huizinga/the department of rheumatology LUMC has received research support/lecture fees/consultancy fees from Merck, UCB, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Galapagos, Boeringher and Eli Lilly, Consultant of: Tom WJ Huizinga/the department of rheumatology LUMC has received research support/lecture fees/consultancy fees from Merck, UCB, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Galapagos, Boeringher and Eli Lilly, Grant/research support from: Tom WJ Huizinga/the department of rheumatology LUMC has received research support/lecture fees/consultancy fees from Merck, UCB, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Galapagos, Boeringher and Eli Lilly, Annette van der Helm-van Mil: None declared

Clinical trial management: a profession in crisis?

Clinical trial managers play a vital role in the design and conduct of clinical trials in the UK. There is a current recruitment and retention crisis for this specialist role due to a complex set of factors, most likely to have come to a head due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Academic clinical trial units and departments are struggling to recruit trial managers to vacant positions, and multiple influences are affecting the retention of this highly skilled workforce. Without tackling this issue, we face major challenges in the delivery on the Department of Health and Social Care's Future of UK Clinical Research Delivery implementation plan. This article, led by a leading network of and for UK Trial Managers, presents some of the issues and ways in which national stakeholders may be able to address this.

Management of Urological Malignancy in Heart and Lung Transplant Recipients: An Irish National Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Following the first hearttransplantin Ireland in 1985, there have been almost 700 deceased donor heart and lung transplants carried out in Ireland at a single institution. In this retrospective study, our aim was to assess the incidence and management of urological malignancies arising in this national cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our retrospective analysis included all heart and lung transplant recipients identified as having a urological malignancy. Primary outcome variables included incidence, management, and clinical outcomes following cancer diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (4.1%) had radiologically or histologically confirmed urological malignancies. Fourteen patientswere diagnosedwith prostate cancer, with 13 who underwent radical treatment. Eight renal cell carcinomas were diagnosed in heart transplant recipients, with 5 who underwent nephrectomies. Two bladder cancers and 1 uppertract urothelial carcinoma were diagnosed and managed with endoscopic resection, radiotherapy, and nephroureterectomy, respectively. Two patients were diagnosed with penile squamous cell carcinoma and managed with radical surgery and lymph node dissection/sampling, with 1 patient receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Urological malignancies are not common in heart and lung transplant recipients; however, standard management options can be safely used, including radical surgery. Prospective monitoring of these patients and potential considerations for screening should be maintained.

Kidney function decline in heart failure patients: an audit of out-patient heart failure services

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

A bidirectional relationship exists between the kidney and the heart; the lower the eGFR the more challenging it is to manage the heart failure (HF) patient. Worsening renal function is common in HF patients and associated with a two-fold increase in mortality and a lower likelihood of being prescribed efficacious HF therapy. The role of cardio-renal interactions in HF is essential to identify risk and subsequent treatment strategies.

Purpose

The purpose of this audit is to provide insights into the assessment of renal function in a real world heart failure population by identifying the degree of renal dysfunction and changes in renal function over a five year time frame.

Methods

A retrospective audit included patients with HFrEF attending a heart failure service. These patients were classified using KIDGO criteria CKD 1-5. A current eGFR sample was compared with a sample taken five years earlier, identified using the electronic laboratory record. Ethical approval was granted from the Research Ethics Committee.

Resultss

100 patients with HFrEF attending a heart failure service fulfilled the selection criteria of which sixty three patients with an eGFR &gt;60ml/min/1.73 m2 were audited. Of this group 43 were CKD class 2 and 20 were CKD class 1. Thirty seven patients had an eGFR &lt;60ml/min/1.73 m2 of which 9 were class 3b, 9 were CKD class 4 and 1 was CKD Class 5.

Of the 100 patients enrolled, 6 were excluded from the analysis of kidney function decline as an eGFR from five years earlier was unavailable. Within a five year time span, 44 patients did not change their CKD class, 31 patients declined by one class, 9 patients declined by two classes, 3 patients declined by three classes and 7 patients improved their kidney function.

GFR &lt; 60mL/min/1.73m2,

n = 37

GFR &gt; 60mL/min/1.73m2, n = 63

Age – mean (range)

77.8 (49-94)

66.5 (45-89)

Gender – female (%)

12 (32%)

16 (25%)

Average renal function measurements (mean, range)

6.4

6.7

Total albumin

creatinine ratio measurements

8

6

Actively attending renal service

6

0

Conclusion

Nurses should be aware of the increasing risk conferred by the dual diagnosis of heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Patients with heart failure who have decreasing eGFR levels (especially less than 30 mL/min), should have collaborative management with nephrology services to optimise outcomes. Recognition of CKD in our institution and referral to nephrology services was suboptimal and further work is necessary to optimise the management of these patients.

Transitioning a cardiovascular health and rehabilitation programme to a virtual platform during covid 19

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

OnBehalf

Our Hearts Our Minds

Purpose

Can a virtual cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation programme be as effective as face-to-face programme.

Background

The Our Hearts Our Minds (OHOM) prevention and rehabilitation programme rapidly transitioned to a virtual platform in the covid era.  Here we compare if a virtual programme potentially could offer the same standard of the nursing intervention (education, smoking cessation, medical risk factor management and psychosocial health) as the previous face to face programme

Methods

Both the initial assessment (IA) and end of programme (EOP) assessments were conducted via telephone/video as per patient preference. The following measures were recorded at both time points (home blood pressure (BP) monitors were provided)

Smoking (self report) BP/Heart rate, Lipids/HbA1c (facilitated by phlebotomy hub), cardio protective drugs (doses, adherence), Hospital Anxiety and Depression score, EuroQoL

Nursing Intervention Smoking cessation counselling and pharmacotherapy where appropriate

Weekly meeting with cardiologist to optimise BP and lipid management and up titration cardio protective drugs

Bimonthly virtual coaching consultation for monitoring/goal resetting

Bimonthly group video education sessions

Results

From April to November 2020, of the 432 referrals received 400 were eligible with 377 accepting the offer of an IA (94% response rate). 262 have had an IA with the remaining 115 awaiting an assessment date.  Of the completed IA’s 257 were willing to attend the programme (98% uptake).  120 had been offered an end of programme assessment with 114 attending (96% of those offered). The results for the virtual programme were then compared to the same period one year previously when the programme was fully face to face and are outlined in the table below.

The comparison of results delivered via remote delivery are remarkably similar to those achieved in the previous year delivered via face to face.

Conclusion

Initial data has shown that virtual delivery of the nursing component of the OHOM prevention/rehabilitation programme was highly acceptable to patients and was as effective as that of the traditional face to face service.

Table 1 below exhibits the clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

POS1040 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE OMERACT PSAMRIS IN A PHASE IIB, RANDOMISED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF ABATACEPT IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS

Background:

The semi-quantitative Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Psoriatic Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (PsAMRIS) was developed for the evaluation of inflammatory and destructive changes in PsA,1 but has limited trial usage.

Objectives:

To retrospectively utilise the PsAMRIS in a multi-dose, randomised Phase IIb study of abatacept in patients with PsA who have inadequate response to DMARDs (NCT00534313).2

Methods:

Patients were randomised to abatacept (3, 10 or 30/10 mg/kg [the 30-mg/kg group switched to 10 mg/kg after the first two doses]) or placebo and treated for 169 days, after which all patients received abatacept 10 mg/kg through to Day 365. MRI scans of one hand or foot from 123 patients with PsA collected at baseline and on Days 85, 169 and 365 were centrally evaluated by two readers blinded to chronological order and treatment arm. Synovitis, bone oedema, tenosynovitis, periarticular inflammation, bone erosion, bone proliferation and joint space narrowing were assessed as per OMERACT PsAMRIS; a novel total inflammation score was calculated from the sum of synovitis, bone oedema, tenosynovitis and periarticular inflammation. Variables were analysed using all cases (hand or foot) and by hand and foot cases separately.

Results:

At Day 169, the abatacept 30/10 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg group showed the most decrease (improvement) in each inflammatory assessment (Figure 1). The Day 169 change from baseline severity in synovitis and tenosynovitis in the abatacept 30/10 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg groups, respectively, were significantly reduced (improved) compared with placebo (estimated differences of –0.966 [p=0.039] and –1.652 [p=0.014], respectively) (Table 1). Patients originally randomised to placebo and then switched to abatacept 10 mg/kg at Day 169 showed significant improvements in synovitis, tenosynovitis and total inflammation from Day 169 to Day 365 (Table 1, Figure 1). The structural outcomes joint space narrowing and bone erosion remained stable within each treatment group, showing little change from baseline to Days 85, 169 and 365. After separating hand and foot analyses (72 hand and 51 foot cases), only hand tenosynovitis in the 10-mg/kg group and foot synovitis in the 3-mg/kg group were significantly reduced (improved) at Day 169 compared with placebo (differences of –2.331 [p=0.017] and –1.689 [p=0.010], respectively). In general, more comparisons in the hand analysis were statistically significant versus in the foot analysis.

Conclusion:

This analysis confirmed the efficacy of abatacept 10 and 30/10 mg/kg when assessed with the OMERACT PsAMRIS. The inflammatory pathologies, synovitis and tenosynovitis, appeared to be the most responsive MRI outcomes. Analysing hand and foot cases together yielded results consistent with the primary clinical efficacy endpoint (ACR20 response rate), as the abatacept 10- and 30/10-mg/kg groups showed significant differences versus placebo at Day 169;2 reduced sample size in separate hand and foot assessments may have prevented finding significant results corresponding to the combined analysis. These results also demonstrate the responsiveness of the PsAMRIS in PsA randomised clinical trials.

References:

[1]Glinatsi D, et al. J Rheumatol 2015;42:2473–2479.

[2]Mease P, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:939–948.

Table 1.

MRI variables showing significant treatment effectsa

Between groups at Day 169MRI scoreComparatorComparatorDifferenceSEp valueSynovitisPlaceboAbatacept 30/10 mg/kg–0.9660.4610.039TenosynovitisPlaceboAbatacept 10 mg/kg–1.6520.6620.014Placebo group before/after switchbMRI scoreTreatment, Day 169Treatment, Day 365DifferenceSEp valueSynovitisPlaceboAbatacept 10 mg/kg–1.0180.4580.029TenosynovitisPlaceboAbatacept 10 mg/kg–0.9400.3900.018Total inflammationPlaceboAbatacept 10 mg/kg–2.2751.0670.036

aBased on change from baseline at the stated time points (unadjusted p values).

bPatients were switched to abatacept 10 mg/kg after Day 169.

Acknowledgements:

Professional medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Rob Coover, MPH, at Caudex and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.

Disclosure of Interests:

Mikkel Østergaard Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Paul Bird Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Grant/research support from: Gilead, Chahin Pachai Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Shuyan Du Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Chun Wu Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Jessica Landis Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Thomas Fuerst Employee of: Bioclinica, Inc., a contract research service providing radiology central reading services to pharmaceutical, biotech and medical device companies, Harris A Ahmad Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Philip G Conaghan Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Flexion Therapeutics, Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer.

OP0180 IMPACT OF RF AND ANTI-CITRULLINATED PROTEIN ANTIBODY SEROSTATUS ON 2-YEAR RETENTION OF ABATACEPT IN PATIENTS WITH RA

Background:

Up to 50% of patients with RA discontinue DMARD treatment within 18 months.1 However, up to 20% of patients who fail multiple treatments may have a good treatment response to another therapy.1 Predictive biomarkers, such as RF and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), may be useful to stratify patients with RA to the most appropriate treatment.1 ASCORE (Abatacept SubCutaneOus in Routine Clinical PracticE; NCT02090556) was a 2-year, observational, prospective, multicentre study of SC abatacept for the treatment of RA in routine clinical practice.2

Objectives:

To determine if RF/ACPA serostatus and treatment line impact abatacept retention in patients with RA in a post hoc analysis of ASCORE.

Methods:

Eligible patients, aged ≥18 years, with active moderate-to-severe RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria) who were IV abatacept-naive and initiated SC abatacept 125 mg once weekly, were enrolled into two cohorts: biologic (b)DMARD-naive patients and those with ≥1 prior bDMARD treatment failure. This post hoc analysis assessed abatacept retention rate at 2 years in a subset of patients with RF/ACPA serostatus data (n=1748) from the ASCORE study (N=2892; as observed). Baseline (BL) serostatus groups examined by treatment line were: RF/ACPA double positive (+/+) RA, RF/ACPA single positive (RF+/ACPA– or RF–/ACPA+) RA (data not shown) and RF/ACPA double negative (–/–) RA. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) analyses were used to assess change from BL and measures of disease remission (DAS28 [CRP] <2.6, CDAI ≤2.8, and SDAI ≤3.3) in patients with +/+ RA versus –/– RA.

Results:

BL demographic and disease characteristics were similar across serostatus groups and treatment lines (Table 1). Mean age was 57.1 and 57.8 years for +/+ RA and –/– RA, respectively. Mean DAS28 (CRP) was 4.7 and 4.8 for +/+ RA and –/– RA, respectively. In patients with +/+ RA, abatacept retention was greater when given as first-line treatment (57% vs 48% when given as ≥ second-line) (Figure 1). Retention was similar in patients with –/– RA regardless of treatment line. After 2 years, mean (SE) change from BL (LOCF) in DAS28 (CRP) was –1.41 (0.06) and –0.97 (0.09) for patients with +/+ and –/– RA, respectively. For patients with +/+ RA, mean (SE) change from BL in DAS28 (CRP) was –1.62 (0.08) for those in whom abatacept was first-line and –1.19 (0.08) for those in whom abatacept was ≥ second-line. For patients with –/– RA, mean (SE) change from BL in DAS28 (CRP) was –1.03 (0.13) for those in whom abatacept was first-line and –0.93 (0.12) for those in whom abatacept was ≥ second-line. Remission rates (LOCF) were significantly (p<0.0001) higher in patients with +/+ RA vs –/– RA respectively: DAS28 (CRP) 38.4% (n=393) versus 19.3% (n=62); CDAI 50.6% (n=513) versus 33.0% (n=107); and SDAI 49.5% (n=497) versus 32.5% (n=102).

Table 1.

BL demographics and disease characteristics by RF/ACPA status

+/+ RA(n=1079)–/– RA(n=343)First-line (n=511)≥ second-line (n=568)First-line(n=140)≥ second-line(n=203)Age57.1 (13.4)57.1 (12.2)59.5 (14.7)56.6 (13.2)DAS28 (CRP)4.7 (1.2)4.7 (1.2)4.8 (1.1)4.8 (1.2)CDAI26.6 (12.5)26.6 (12.4)27.7 (12.5)28.6 (13.8)SDAI28.1 (13.1)28.1 (12.9)29.1 (12.9)30.2 (14.7)

Data are mean (SD). Patients with missing data for BL RF/ACPA status are excluded.

ACPA=anti-citrullinated protein antibody; BL=baseline.

Conclusion:

In this real-world analysis, patients with +/+ RA treated with first-line abatacept had higher retention than patients receiving abatacept as a ≥ second-line therapy. Remission rates on abatacept were higher in patients with +/+ RA versus –/– RA. These results support early treatment with abatacept and highlight the importance of further evaluating precision medicine approaches in RA.

References:

[1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:685–699.

[2]Alten R, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78(suppl 2):A1639.

Acknowledgements:

Professional medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Lindsay Craik at Caudex and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb. This study was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.

Disclosure of Interests:

Rieke Alten Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Xavier Mariette Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Rene-Marc Flipo Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Maya H Buch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Merck Serono, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Gilead, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Yusuf Patel: None declared, Raimón Sanmartí Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gebro, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gebro, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Sara Marsal Speakers bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Galapagos, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, UCB, M.T. Nurmohamed Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Hedley Griffiths Consultant of: AbbVie, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Peter Peichl: None declared, Bettina Bannert: None declared, Adrian Forster: None declared, Melanie Chartier Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Yedid Elbez Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Christiane Rauch Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Vadim Khaychuk Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Karissa Lozenski Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb

AB0205 A NOVEL METHOD FOR PREDICTING 1-YEAR RETENTION OF ABATACEPT USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES: DIRECTIONALITY AND IMPORTANCE OF PREDICTORS

Background:

In the ACTION (NCT02109666) study, multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models showed that the predictors of 1-year retention to abatacept treatment were: patient global pain assessment, country, reason for stopping last biologic, number of prior biologic treatments, abatacept monotherapy, RF/anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) status, previous neoplasms, psychiatric disorders and cardiac disorders.1 Machine learning techniques, using the gradient-boosting model, subsequently identified additional predictors of abatacept retention in patients with moderate-to-severe RA enrolled in ACTION; however, the analysis did not show the directionality of the predictors.2

Objectives:

To improve the clinical interpretability of the machine learning model in terms of directionality and the importance of each variable in predicting retention.

Methods:

Previous analyses using the gradient-boosting model to identify predictors of abatacept retention at 1 year in the ACTION study have been described.2 This analysis used SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), a mathematical framework, to show how a particular predictor value influences prediction in the context of all other predictors. Higher SHAP values indicate a higher likelihood of retention. The contribution of every variable in the model’s prediction (with the exception of country variables) was computed for each data point to capture individual variable impact. This enabled interpretation for level of importance and directionality at a patient level.

Results:

Using data from 2350 patients enrolled in ACTION (May 2008 to December 2013), the mean retention rate at 1 year was 59.3% (n=1393). Overall variable importance is shown in Figure 1. After removal of country variables, the top five baseline predictors of retention were: no previous corticosteroid use, ACR functional class II, ≥2 prior biologic treatments prior to abatacept initiation, abatacept monotherapy and HAQ-DI. In terms of directionality, no previous corticosteroid use, ≥2 prior biologic treatments prior to abatacept initiation, abatacept monotherapy and a higher HAQ-DI score at baseline were associated with a lower likelihood of retention; ACR functional class II was associated with a higher likelihood of retention.

Conclusion:

The gradient-boosting model previously identified predictors of abatacept retention from ACTION;2 the addition of SHAP in this analysis has provided information on the importance and directionality of those predictors. The most important predictor of abatacept retention was no previous corticosteroid use, which was associated with lower retention. The models and predictors identified could be further refined by using additional datasets from clinical trials. Machine learning offers an innovative and complementary approach to biostatistics and could be used to identify treatment response predictors at an individual patient level, leading to a more personalised treatment approach.

References:

[1]Alten R, et al. RMD Open 2017;3:e000538.

[2]Alten R, et al. Presented at the virtual ACR Convergence 2020; 5–9 November 2020. Poster number 1745.

Acknowledgements:

This study was supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. Professional medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Claire Line, PhD, at Caudex and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.

Disclosure of Interests:

Rieke Alten Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Claire Behar Shareholder of: I have not invested directly in pharmaceutical companies producing drugs/devices for use in rheumatology however I may have shares via the funds linked to my life insurance., Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Christine Boileau Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Nanobiotix, Pierre Merckaert Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Ebenezer Afari Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Virginie Vannier-Moreau Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Aurelie Najm Speakers bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Pierre-Antoine Juge Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Angshu Rai Shareholder of: Amgen Inc, Consultant of: Amgen Inc, Employee of: Amgen Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Yedid Elbez Consultant of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Karissa Lozenski Shareholder of: Bristol Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol Myers Squibb

Delivering a dietetic intervention to cardiovascular patients in the Covid era

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): Department of Health

Introduction

Healthy diet and body composition are core components of cardiac rehabilitation. Following the COVID outbreak in March 2020, our face-to-face cardiac rehabilitation programme (Our Hearts Our Minds) was suspended. The programme was then quickly moved to a virtual platform to continue to deliver the programme.

Purpose

Here we describe how the OHOM programme adapted our service to deliver the dietetic assessment and intervention on a virtual platform.

Methods

Pre-Covid the dietary component of OHOM consisted of a face-to-face Initial Assessment (IA) with a dietitian, group education sessions and an End of Programme assessment (EOP). Anthropometric measures and dietary habits were assessed including adherence to the Mediterranean diet via the Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS) toolkit. Using behaviour change techniques, tailored dietary advice was provided and goals agreed to educate on healthier food choices, increase adherence to Mediterranean diet and (if appropriate) promote weight loss and reduce central obesity. The assessment and intervention is now delivered virtually via telephone or video. Anthropometrics are self-reported with tape-measures supplied to assess waist circumference and advice provided on home-weighing. MDS is still assessed. The programme includes fortnightly coaching telephone consultations to review and reset goals, the option to attend a dietitian-led virtual group education session, access to a filmed educational video and submission of food diaries via the Fitbit app.

Results

From April to November 2020, 114 patients completed the virtual programme (65 telephone, 39 video). Dietetic outcomes are outlined in Table 1 with inclusion of data for a similar period one year previously (face-to-face) for comparison. Reductions in anthropometric measures and increased adherence to a cardio-protective diet were noted and the results for the two time periods are remarkably similar.

Conclusion

Delivery of a virtual dietetic component in cardiac rehabilitation is feasible, acceptable and just as effective as face-to-face based on preliminary data.

Table 1: Dietary outcomes at IA and EOP Face-to-face assessments (April - March 2019) Virtual assessments (April - November 2020) IA EOP Change IA EOP Change Mean weight (in those with BMI &gt;25kg/m2) 86.5 85.2 -1.3 91.4 88.6 -2.8 Waist circumference (cm) 104.3 103 -1.3 107 102 -5 Mean MDS (Range 1-14) 4.4 7.5 +3.1 4.8 7.8 +3 % Consuming oily fish once per week 20 57 +37 25 68 +43 Achieving fruit and vegetable target 16 61 +45 21 57 +36

Abstract Figure. Dietitian waist circumference tutorial

54 Patient Satisfaction During A Pandemic – Virtually Impossible?

Introduction

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic we conducted virtual urology clinics for the first time at our institution. We aimed to assess patient satisfaction with the virtual clinic format.

Method

Patients who underwent virtual consultation were contacted by phone and surveyed about their appointment. Convenience, thoroughness, satisfaction, preference and reason for appointment were assessed via questionnaire

Results

77 randomly selected patients were contacted. 63 males (82%), 14 females (18%). Median age 61 years (range 16–86). 62 (80%) reviews, 12 (16%) new referrals, and 3 (4%) post-operative patients were surveyed. 55 (71%) were booked for repeat appointment, 13 (17%) for further investigations, 6 (8%) discharged, and 3 (4%) listed for surgery.

73 (95%) found it convenient, 3 (4%) were neutral and 1 (1%) found it inconvenient. 74 (96%) felt thoroughly assessed and 76 (99%) of patients had all their concerns addressed. 74 (96%) were satisfied with their review, 2 (3%) were neutral, and 1 (1%) was dissatisfied. Going forward, 50 (65%) would prefer virtual follow-up and 27 (35%) would prefer an in-person review.

Conclusions

Virtual clinic is preferable to the majority of patients in our urology service and is deemed convenient, thorough and satisfactory by them. It should be facilitated going forward in appropriately selected patients.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose rivaroxaban on top of aspirin in patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity: an analysis from the COMPASS trial

Background

In patients with coronary or peripheral artery disease, intensified antithrombotic therapy with aspirin plus low dose rivaroxaban reduced cardiovascular outcomes compared with aspirin alone. Polypharmacy and multimorbidity are frequent in patients with vascular disease and are often perceived as barriers to more intensive pharmacotherapy by both patients and physicians.

Purpose

To report cardiovascular outcomes and the efficacy, safety, and net benefit of low dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in patients with stable vascular disease by the number of concomitant cardiovascular drugs and by the number of comorbidities.

Methods

We reported ischemic events (cardiovascular death, stroke, or MI), major bleeding (ISTH modified criteria), and a prespecified net clinical outcome in participants from the randomised, double-blind COMPASS study by number of cardiovascular medications (0–2, 3, 4, 5–7) and by number of concomitant medical conditions. We compared rates and hazard ratios of patients treated with rivaroxaban plus aspirin vs aspirin alone by category of number of medications and concomitant conditions and tested for interaction between polypharmacy and multimorbidity and antithrombotic regimen.

Results

Although patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity have a higher risk of cardiovascular events (Figure) those who required many cardiovascular drugs derived the largest absolute reduction in the net clinical outcome when adding rivaroxaban on top of aspirin. The relative efficacy, safety, and net clinical benefit of adding low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in patients with stable vascular diseases were not affected by the number of cardiovascular drugs or by the number of comorbidities. Multimorbidity, but not polypharmacy, was related with a higher risk of major bleeding.

Conclusion

Addition of low-dose rivaroxaban conveyed a benefit irrespective of the number of concomitant drugs or comorbid conditions. Multiple comorbidities and/or polypharmacy should not dissuade the addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to aspirin in otherwise eligible patients.

Figure 1

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The COMPASS trial was funded by Bayer AG.

Vitamin K antagonists versus direct oral anticoagulants after cardiac surgery: a 31-country cohort study

Background

About 10% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery have a history of atrial fibrillation (AF). Among these patients, uncertainty exists regarding the safest and most effective oral anticoagulant (OAC) during the postoperative period.

Purpose

To evaluate practice patterns regarding OAC early after cardiac surgery in patients with a preoperative history of AF and to compare the safety and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).

Methods

We conducted a nested cohort study within the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study (LAAOS) III (NCT01561651). LAAOS III included patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery with a CHA2DS2-VASC ≥2. In this substudy, we examined patients without end-stage renal dysfunction (eGFR &gt;30 mL/min/1.73m2) who were discharged on OAC. We evaluated bleeding and thromboembolism within 90 days postoperatively using logistic regression adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASC score.

Results

Recruitment started in 2012 and completed in 2018 in 113 centres in 31 countries. Of the 4811 patients enrolled in LAAOS III, 3725 (77%) were included in this substudy. Preoperatively, 58% of patients received OAC: 56% DOACs and 44% VKAs. At hospital discharge 23% received DOACs and 77% VKAs; 55% of patients on a DOAC at baseline were switched to a VKA while 5% of patients on a VKA were switched to a DOAC. Patients discharged on a DOAC were older, had a higher CHA2DS2-VASC, and were more likely to be male. Patients having undergone an isolated coronary bypass procedure were more likely prescribed DOACs than VKAs (41% vs 23%, p&lt;0.001) whereas isolated non-mechanical valve patients were more likely to be prescribed VKAs (43% vs 28%, p&lt;0.001). Switching from a DOAC to a VKA postoperatively occurred in 42% of patients In Australia/New Zealand, 49% in Europe, and 63% in North America. Major bleeding between 48 hours postoperatively and 30 days occurred in 1.5% in the DOAC group and 1.3% in the VKA group (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 0.60–2.15, p=0.69) while between 48 hours and 90 days, it occurred in 1.8% of patients in both groups (aOR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.54–1.17, p=0.91). Cardiac tamponade, the composite of stroke and systemic arterial embolism, and the composite of stroke, systemic arterial embolism and death did not differ significantly at 30 and 90 days between the DOAC and VKA groups.

Conclusions

VKAs was the dominant OAC used early after cardiac surgery, but postoperative OAC practices varied by region. After adjustment for CHA2DS2-VASC score, the early postoperative incidence of major bleeding and of the composite of stroke and systemic arterial embolism did not differ significantly when DOACs were compared with VKAs.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): CIHR, Heart and Stroke Foundation

THU0063 DIFFERENTIAL PHARMACODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF ABATACEPT AND ADALIMUMAB ON THE SERUM PROTEOME OF PATIENTS WITH RA USING THE SOMASCAN® PLATFORM

Background:

Abatacept (ABA) versus adaliMumab (ADA) comParison in bioLogic-naïvERA subjects with background MTX (AMPLE) was a Phase IIIb clinical trial to compare the safety, efficacy and radiographic outcomes of ABA vs ADA in patients with RA who exhibited an inadequate response to MTX and who were naïve to biologic DMARDs.1While both therapies demonstrated similar efficacy across multiple outcomes, their mechanisms of action (MoAs) are quite different; ABA is a T-cell co-stimulation modulator and ADA is a TNFα inhibitor. Previous transcriptomic analysis of the whole blood samples showed differential pharmacodynamic (PD) effects between the treatments.1–3

Objectives:

To expand our understanding of differential PD changes in the serum proteome over time in patients treated with ABA or ADA in AMPLE using a novel proteomic platform.

Methods:

Serum was available from 440 patients in AMPLE at four time points (Days 1, 85, 365 and 729). Serum samples from the patients in AMPLE and 123 healthy individuals with matching demographics were subjected to proteomic quantification by a highly multiplexed DNA aptamer technology with wide dynamic ranges (SomaLogic SomaScan®platform).4A linear model analysis was used to identify protein abundance changes over time and changes specific to treatment. Other covariates included in the model were country of origin, ethnicity and sex. Additionally, patient effect was adjusted for as a random factor.

Results:

Both treatments exhibited a significant PD effect on serum proteome over the course of the 2-year trial, with 73 proteins modulated by ABA and 125 by ADA. There were large overlaps between the two treatments, including proteins associated with RA, such as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 13 (CXCL13), matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP3) and serum amyloid A1/A2 (SAA1/2). Changes in the levels of these proteins may be indicative of general improvement of the disease. The proteins modulated by the treatments were enriched in the G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signalling and innate immunity pathways. Among the proteins that exhibited significantly different PD effects between the treatments were CRP, CC chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17) and β-defensin 112 (Figure). While patients showed marked improvement in their symptoms after 2 years of treatment, the overall serum proteomic profiles of the patients were still different from those of a normal healthy population.

Conclusion:

The SomaScan®platform provides a robust method for quantifying the PD change in a broad portion of the serum proteome in clinical trials. In AMPLE, abatacept was more selective than adalimumab in modulating protein biomarkers in patients with RA, though there was large overlap in proteins modulated by both treatments. The treatment-specific changes may reflect the different MoAs leading to similar clinical outcomes. While patients in both groups benefited from treatments, their serum proteome remained notably different from that of a healthy population. Further analysis by responder status may provide additional links between the treatment responses and proteomic changes. Proteomic approaches as described in our study could contribute to clinical trials and help shape treatment strategies for patients with RA.

References:

[1]Schiff M, et al.Ann Rheum Dis2014;73:86–94.

[2]Bandyopadhyay S, et al.Arthritis Rheum2014;66:Abstract 1520.

[3]Sokolove J, et al.Ann Rheum Dis2016;75:709–14.

[4]Gold L, et al.PLoS One2010;5:e15004.

Disclosure of Interests:

David Galbraith Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Minal Caliskan Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Omar Jabado Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sarah Hu Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roy Fleischmann Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer, IngelhCentrexion, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Selecta, Taiho, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, ACEA, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Michael Weinblatt Grant/research support from: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, Lily, Sanofi/Regeneron, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, Gilead, Horizon, Lily, Pfizer, Roche, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Michael A Maldonado Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sheng Gao Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb

SAT0104 MAINTENANCE OF SDAI REMISSION AND PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) FOLLOWING DOSE DE-ESCALATION OF ABATACEPT IN MTX-NAÏVE, ANTI-CITRULLINATED PROTEIN ANTIBODY (ACPA)+ PATIENTS WITH EARLY RA: RESULTS FROM AVERT-2, A RANDOMISED PHASE IIIB STUDY

Background:

The Phase IIIbAssessingVeryEarlyRATreatment (AVERT)-2 trial (NCT02504268) evaluated SC abatacept (ABA) + MTX vs ABA placebo (PBO) + MTX in ACPA+ patients (pts) with early, active RA.1Results from the 56-wk induction period (IP) showed a significantly greater proportion of pts treated with ABA + MTX (vs MTX alone) reported clinically meaningful improvements in HAQ-DI, global disease activity and pain, which were sustained at 52 wks.2

Objectives:

To report maintenance of SDAI remission and PROs from the AVERT-2 de-escalation (D-E) period.

Methods:

Pts received blinded SC ABA (125 mg once wkly [QW]) + MTX or ABA PBO + MTX induction treatment for 56 wks. In this analysis, pts who completed induction with ABA + MTX and had sustained SDAI remission (≤3.3 at Wks 40 and 52) were re-randomised 1:1:1 to ABA QW + MTX, stepwise D-E (ABA every other wk + MTX for 24 wks then ABA PBO + MTX for 24 wks), or ABA QW + MTX PBO for 48 wks in the D-E period. PROs included physical function (HAQ-DI [0–3; decrease=improvement] and Short-Form 36 [SF-36] v2.0 Physical Functioning Scale [PFS]; 0–100; increase=improvement), and fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-F] score; 0–52; decrease=improvement). Endpoints included: proportion of pts in SDAI remission and pts with HAQ-DI response (decrease from IP Day [D]1 in HAQ-DI ≥0.30); adjusted mean change (adMC) from D-E D1 in HAQ-DI, SF-36 PFS or FACIT-F to D-E Wk 48. adMCs were estimated using a mixed effect model with repeated measures.

Results:

147 ABA + MTX-treated pts were re-randomised in the D-E period. Across re-randomised arms, the range of mean scores was 1.87–2.52 for SDAI and 0.18–0.30 for HAQ-DI at entry into D-E period (D-E D1). 74% of pts receiving ABA QW + MTX maintained SDAI remission at D-E Wk 48 (Fig 1); this proportion was higher than in the ABA withdrawal and ABA QW + MTX PBO arms. Pts continuing ABA QW + MTX maintained HAQ-DI response during D-E (Fig 1), but by D-E Wk 48 the proportion of pts with HAQ-DI response in the ABA withdrawal arm declined by 30%. At D-E Wk 48, a small numerical decrease (adMC –0.04) in HAQ-DI was observed in the ABA QW + MTX arm; increases were seen in the withdrawal (adMC 0.26) and ABA QW + MTX PBO arms (adMC 0.16). By D-E Wk 48, SF-36 PFS increased (adMC 1.68) in the ABA QW + MTX arm but decreased in the withdrawal (adMC –3.34) and ABA QW + MTX PBO (adMC –1.45) arms. FACIT-F score increased during D-E in all arms, but the increase at D-E Wk 48 was lower in the ABA QW + MTX arm (adMC 0.79) vs the withdrawal (adMC 4.12) and ABA QW + MTX PBO (adMC 2.41) arms. Similar trends were seen for other PROs including Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-RA; while activity impairment remained stable in the ABA QW + MTX arm, there was a trend for worsening in the withdrawal arm.

Conclusion:

In the AVERT-2 D-E period, continued combination therapy (abatacept + MTX) resulted in maintenance of benefits on PROs, particularly physical functioning, in seropositive pts with early RA. D-E of abatacept followed by complete withdrawal was associated with the greatest loss of remission as well as worsening of PROs. The PRO results corresponded well to the maintenance of clinical (SDAI) remission.

References:

[1]Emery P, et al. ACR 2018; San Diego, USA: Poster 563.

[2]Emery P, et al. ACR 2019; Atlanta, USA: Poster 1423.

Acknowledgments:

Joanna Wright (medical writing, Caudex; funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb)

Disclosure of Interests:

Paul Emery Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche (all paid to employer), Consultant of: AbbVie (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Bristol-Myers Squibb (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Lilly (clinical trials, advisor), Merck Sharp & Dohme (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Novartis (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Pfizer (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Roche (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Samsung (clinical trials, advisor), Sandoz (clinical trials, advisor), UCB (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Yoshiya Tanaka Grant/research support from: Asahi-kasei, Astellas, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, and Ono, Consultant of: Abbvie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Sanofi, UCB, and Teijin, Vivian Bykerk: None declared, Thomas Huizinga Grant/research support from: Ablynx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Ablynx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, Gustavo Citera Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gema, Genzyme, Novartis and Pfizer Inc, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gema, Genzyme, Novartis and Pfizer Inc, Clifton Bingham Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Subhashis Banerjee Shareholder of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lily, Pfizer, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb (current); AbbVie, Lily, Pfizer (past), Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Joe Zhuo Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Robert Wong Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kuan-Hsiang Gary Huang Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Karissa Lozenski Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Yedid Elbez Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roy Fleischmann Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer, IngelhCentrexion, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Selecta, Taiho, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, ACEA, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB

FRI0090 MAINTENANCE OF CLINICAL RESPONSE WITH ABATACEPT IN COMBINATION WITH MTX IN INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS WITH EARLY RA WHO ARE MTX-NAÏVE AND ANTI-CITRULLINATED PROTEIN ANTIBODY (ACPA)+: RESULTS FROM THE INDUCTION PERIOD OF AVERT-2, A RANDOMISED PHASE IIIB STUDY

Background:

In the 56-wk induction period (IP) of the Phase IIIbAssessingVeryEarlyRATreatment (AVERT)-2 trial (NCT02504268), more patients (pts) achieved SDAI remission (≤3.3) with abatacept (ABA) + MTX vs ABA placebo (PBO) + MTX at IP Wk 52.1It is unknown whether each individual pt within a treatment (Tx) group achieves and sustains the same efficacy endpoints at all time points during the IP.

Objectives:

To investigate whether ABA effectiveness is sustained by individual pts who achieved SDAI remission (≤3.3), SDAI low disease activity (LDA; >3.3–11), DAS28 (CRP) <2.6, ACR50/70 response or Boolean remission at IP Wk 24 (AVERT-2 primary endpoint) and both Wks 40 and 52 (Wks 40/52).

Methods:

Pts were randomised 3:2 to blinded SC ABA (125 mg/wk) + MTX or ABA PBO + MTX induction Tx for 56 wks. Key inclusion criteria: age ≥18 yrs; RA diagnosis (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria); RA duration ≤6 mos; SDAI >11; ACPA+; CRP >3 mg/L or ESR ≥28 mm/h; TJC ≥3 and SJC ≥3; DMARD naïve. Response rates were investigated by Tx arm in the cohort 1 analysis population (all randomised pts treated in the IP [intent-to-treat analysis]).

Results:

Of randomised cohort 1, 752 pts were treated during the IP: 451 with ABA + MTX and 301 with ABA PBO + MTX. Baseline characteristics were similar across Tx arms.1Stringent SDAI remission endpoint at IP Wk 24 was achieved by 22% of ABA + MTX-treated pts; of these, 56% sustained SDAI remission at IP Wks 40/52 (Table). A similar proportion of ABA + MTX-treated pts achieved (17%) and sustained (58%) Boolean remission at IP Wks 24 and 40/52. At IP Wk 24, 42% of ABA + MTX-treated pts achieved DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 and 74% sustained DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 to IP Wks 40/52; a high proportion of patients sustained ACR50/70 responses at IP Wks 40/52 (83% and 79%, respectively). A lower proportion of pts sustained SDAI LDA to IP Wks 40/52 vs other endpoints (Table). Most efficacy endpoints were achieved by fewer pts who received ABA PBO + MTX than ABA + MTX (Table); among responders in this Tx group, fewer sustained remission at Wks 40/52, which correlates with a higher proportion of pts sustaining SDAI LDA at Wks 40/52 with ABA PBO + MTX than ABA + MTX.

Conclusion:

The majority of individual pts with RA who achieved clinically stringent endpoints such as SDAI remission, DAS28 (CRP) <2.6 or Boolean remission, as well as clinically meaningful endpoints such as ACR50/70 at IP Wk 24 with weekly SC abatacept, sustained their responses to Wks 40/52. The high proportion of patients achieving early stringent remission and response to SC abatacept by individual pts may be indicative of sustained efficacy over time.

References:

[1]Emery P, et al. ACR 2018; San Diego, USA: Poster 563.

Table .

Proportion of Pts With Response at IP Wk 24 Who Also Achieved Remission at Wks 40/52

EndpointResponders at IP Wk 24, n (%)Responders at IP Wk 24 and Wks 40/52, n/N (%)ABA + MTX(n=451)ABA PBO + MTX(n=301)ABA + MTX*ABA PBO + MTX*SDAI remission (≤3.3)100 (22)40 (13)56/100 (56)17/40 (43)SDAI low disease activity (>3.3–11)167 (37)82 (27)46/167 (28)32/82 (39)DAS28 (CRP) <2.6188 (42)78 (26)139/188 (74)43/78 (55)ACR50 response†260 (58)125 (42)215/260 (83)92/125 (74)ACR70 response†156 (35)66 (22)123/156 (79)42/66 (64)Boolean remission76 (17)29 (10)44/76 (58)8/29 (28)

*% based on number of pts within each Tx group who achieved response at IP Wk 24 (denominator);†Response at IP Wks 24 and 52

Acknowledgments:

Lola Parfitt (medical writing, Caudex; funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb)

Disclosure of Interests:

Paul Emery Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Roche (all paid to employer), Consultant of: AbbVie (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Bristol-Myers Squibb (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Lilly (clinical trials, advisor), Merck Sharp & Dohme (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Novartis (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Pfizer (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Roche (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Samsung (clinical trials, advisor), Sandoz (clinical trials, advisor), UCB (consultant, clinical trials, advisor), Yoshiya Tanaka Grant/research support from: Asahi-kasei, Astellas, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, Bristol-Myers, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, and Ono, Consultant of: Abbvie, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, Bristol-Myers, Takeda, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Sanofi, UCB, and Teijin, Vivian Bykerk: None declared, Clifton Bingham Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Thomas Huizinga Grant/research support from: Ablynx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Ablynx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Sanofi, Gustavo Citera Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gema, Genzyme, Novartis and Pfizer Inc, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Gema, Genzyme, Novartis and Pfizer Inc, Kuan-Hsiang Gary Huang Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Yedid Elbez Consultant of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Robert Wong Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Karissa Lozenski Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roy Fleischmann Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer, IngelhCentrexion, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Selecta, Taiho, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, ACEA, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB

FRI0576 IDENTIFICATION OF SERUM PROTEIN BIOMARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH RA DISEASE SEVERITY

Background:

RA is a systemic autoimmune disease with heterogeneous manifestation. Recent advances in serum proteomics, such as the SomaScan®platform (SomaLogic, Inc., Boulder, USA), allow for a deeper exploration of the protein biomarkers associated with RA and a better understanding of the molecular aetiology of the disease.

Objectives:

To characterise the differences in baseline serum proteome of patients with RA (enrolled in the Phase IIIb Abatacept vs adaliMumab comParison in bioLogic-naïvERA subjects with background MTX [AMPLE] study)1compared with a healthy population, and to identify serum protein biomarkers associated with disease severity and radiographic progression.

Methods:

Patients in the AMPLE study had an inadequate response to MTX and were naïve to biologic DMARDs. Protein abundance was assessed in baseline serum samples from 440 AMPLE study patients and 123 healthy individuals with matching demographics using the SomaScan®platform, with 5000+ slow off-rate modified aptamers and up to 8 log of dynamic range.2Differential abundance testing was performed using linear models to identify differences in protein abundance in patients with RA vs healthy individuals. A separate analysis using a linear model was conducted in only the patients with RA to identify the proteins associated with DAS28 (CRP) and TSS. Pathway analyses were performed for proteins significantly (false discovery rate-adjusted p value <0.05) associated with RA and the disease severity measurements to identify over-representation of the molecular pathways.

Results:

Compared with healthy individuals, >2000 serum proteins were significantly differentially expressed in patients with RA, including many proteins that have been associated with RA (e.g. serum amyloid A [SAA], CRP) and complement. Most of the protein expression differences were of small magnitude (fold change <2). Proteins that were differentially expressed between patients with RA and healthy individuals were enriched in interleukin signalling, neutrophil degranulation, platelet activation/degranulation and extracellular matrix organisation pathways. DAS28 (CRP) was significantly associated with several biomarkers, including SAA, fibrinogen and CRP; in general, proteins associated with DAS28 (CRP) were most strongly enriched in the platelet activation/degranulation pathways (Figure 1), also seen in patients with RA vs healthy individuals. Additionally, many proteins were significantly associated with TSS, including SAA, matrix metalloproteinase-3 and cartilage acidic protein 1. Here, the proteins were most strongly enriched in the extracellular matrix remodelling pathways (Figure 2).

Conclusion:

Our study revealed that thousands of serum proteins are differentially expressed and several pathways are dysregulated between patients with RA and healthy individuals. Additional pathways were identified that reflect disease severity, including joint damage, distinct from those pathways associated with the disease. The SomaScan®platform provides a unique proteomic tool with a wide dynamic range for the identification of serum protein biomarkers associated with RA and disease severity. Proteomic signatures should be considered in clinical trials to better understand disease pathogenesis and predict risk in response to treatment.

References:

[1]Schiff M, et al.Ann Rheum Dis2014;73:86–94.

[2]Gold L, et al.PLoS One2010;5:e15004.

Acknowledgments:

Rachel Rankin (medical writing, Caudex; funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb)

Disclosure of Interests:

David Galbraith Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Minal Caliskan Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Omar Jabado Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sarah Hu Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roy Fleischmann Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Akros, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer, IngelhCentrexion, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roche, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, Selecta, Taiho, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, ACEA, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, UCB, Michael Weinblatt Grant/research support from: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, Lily, Sanofi/Regeneron, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Crescendo, Gilead, Horizon, Lily, Pfizer, Roche, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Michael A Maldonado Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sheng Gao Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb

FRI0038 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABATACEPT EXPOSURE AND EFFICACY MEASURES IN EARLY MTX-NAIVE ANTI-CITRULLINATED PROTEIN ANTIBODY-POSITIVE PATIENTS WITH RA DURING THE DE-ESCALATION PERIOD OF A PHASE IIIB STUDY

Background:

Although EULAR/ACR guidelines suggest tapering biologic treatment for RA following sustained remission in patients (pts), specific de-escalation (DE) regimens are not defined. The Phase IIIb Assessing Very Early Rheumatoid arthritis Treatment (AVERT)-2 trial (NCT02504268) is evaluating SC abatacept (ABA) + MTX versus ABA placebo (PBO) + MTX in Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibody (ACPA)-positive pts with early (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria; disease duration ≤6 mths), active RA (SDAI >11). AVERT-2 was designed to investigate achievement of SDAI remission and a clinically meaningful dose DE strategy among pts in sustained remission who completed induction with ABA + MTX. In moderately to severely active RA and JIA patients, a relationship between ABA Cmin and efficacy was observed. Therefore, this analysis in very early RA patients, reports on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of ABA and the maintenance of remission during the DE period of AVERT-2.

Objectives:

To assess the relationship between changes in ABA exposure and the maintenance of remission and the effect of immunogenicity on exposure during the DE period of AVERT-2.

Methods:

Pts received blinded SC ABA (125 mg once wkly [QW]) + MTX or ABA PBO + MTX induction treatment for 56 wks. Pts who completed induction with ABA + MTX and had sustained SDAI remission (≤3.3 at Wks 40 and 52) were re-randomized 1:1:1 to ABA QW + MTX for 48 wks (Arm C), ABA every other wk (EOW) + MTX for 24 wks followed by ABA PBO + MTX for 24 wks (Arm D), or ABA QW + MTX PBO for 48 wks (Arm E) in the DE period. ABA trough (Cmin) and anti-drug antibody (ADA) samples were collected in all subjects during the DE period. Serum ABA concentrations and ADA were measured using a validated enzyme immunoassay method and an electrochemiluminescence assay, respectively. Efficacy endpoints included change from DE Day 1 in SDAI score, HAQ-DI score, Physician’s Global Assessment (PhGA), and tender (TJC) and swollen (SJC) joint counts. The relationship between ABA Cmin and efficacy endpoints were assessed. Additionally, the impact of immunogenicity on ABA Cmin was explored.

Results:

Mean ABA Cmin values remained stable throughout the DE period for subjects in Arms C and E. ABA Cmin values decreased by ~50% in subjects in Arm D for the first 24 weeks from the start of DE and were ~0 for weeks 24-48 consistent with the change in the frequency of ABA dosing from EOW to ABA withdrawal (Figure 1 top).

Figure 1:

Mean (SD) ABA Cmin values (top) and Mean Change From Baseline in SDAI (bottom) in Subjects in DE Arm C (ABA QW + MTX), D (ABA EOW + MTX followed by ABA placebo + MTX), and E (ABA QW + MTX placebo)

The incidence of immunogenicity appeared to increase upon withdrawal of ABA in Arm D. ADA formation did not appear to affect ABA Cmin, as ABA Cmin remained consistent between pts with and without ADA.

Upon withdrawal of ABA in Arm D, there appeared to be an increase in the mean change from baseline (Day 1 of DE) in SDAI over time, which followed a similar time course as the washout of ABA (Figure 1 bottom). Similar results were observed for other efficacy endpoints such as HAQ-DI, PhGA, TJC, and SJC.

Conclusion:

The PK data in these early onset, MTX-naive, ACPA+ RA pts correlated well with the maintenance of remission in Arms A and E. Tapering of ABA from EOW to MTX only in Arm D results in a corresponding decrease in ABA Cmin, an increase in positive antibody response, and loss of remission.

References:

[1]Emery et. al. ACR [Abstract L11]. Nov. 2019. Atlanta GA USA

[2]Li et. al. J Clin Pharmacol. Vol 59(2). Feb 2019.

Disclosure of Interests:

Yash Gandhi Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sean Connolly Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Kuan-Hsiang Gary Huang Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Robert Wong Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Shannon Chilewski Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bindu Murthy Shareholder of: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Employee of: Bristol-Myers Squibb

The mechanical responses of advecting cells in confined flow

Fluid dynamics have long influenced cells in suspension. Red blood cells and white blood cells are advected through biological microchannels in both the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems and, as a result, are subject to a wide variety of complex fluidic forces as they pass through. In vivo, microfluidic forces influence different biological processes such as the spreading of infection, cancer metastasis, and cell viability, highlighting the importance of fluid dynamics in the blood and lymphatic vessels. This suggests that in vitro devices carrying cell suspensions may influence the viability and functionality of cells. Lab-on-a-chip, flow cytometry, and cell therapies involve cell suspensions flowing through microchannels of approximately 100-800  μ m. This review begins by examining the current fundamental theories and techniques behind the fluidic forces and inertial focusing acting on cells in suspension, before exploring studies that have investigated how these fluidic forces affect the reactions of suspended cells. In light of these studies' findings, both in vivo and in vitro fluidic cell microenvironments shall also be discussed before concluding with recommendations for the field.

P4784Efficacy and safety of dronedarone by duration of atrial fibrillation history: a post-hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is known to progress over time and the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapy may vary based on the duration of a patient's AF history. Outcomes with dronedarone (DRO) based on duration of AF/atrial flutter (AFL) history have not been previously characterized.

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DRO by time since first known AF/AFL episode in patients studied in the ATHENA trial.

Methods

2859 (61.8%) patients from ATHENA with documented first known AF/AFL episode (of 4628 total patients randomized) were included in the analysis. Among these patients, first AF/AFL episode was reported at <3 months (shorter history), 3 to <24 months (intermediate), and ≥24 months (longer) in 1296 (45.3%), 845 (29.6%) and 718 (25.1%) patients, respectively. AF/AFL recurrence was evaluated in patients in sinus rhythm at baseline by ECG during study visits or symptom recurrence.

Results

Demographics (age, sex) were similar across all groups. Patients with longer AF/AFL history tended to have higher prevalence of coronary heart disease and structural heart disease; and were more likely to have AF/AFL (by 12-lead ECG) at baseline (30%) compared to 26% and 16% for intermediate and shorter history groups. Patients with a longer AF history likely had a prior ablation for AF/AFL (7%) vs patients with an intermediate (2%) or shorter AF/AFL history (1%), and more likely required cardioversion during the study (24%) vs intermediate (17%) and shorter history groups (11%). Outcomes and efficacy are reported in Table 1. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, permanent drug discontinuations, and deaths were similar across all AF/AFL groups.

Table 1. Outcomes and efficacy summary Relative Risk, dronedarone (DRO) vs placebo (PBO)1 (95% CI)1,2 AF/AFL <3 months AF/AFL 3 to <24 months AF/AFL ≥24 months PBO (n=626) DRO (n=670) PBO (n=429) DRO (n=416) PBO (n=363) DRO (n=355) First CV hospitalization3 or death (any cause) 0.79 (0.65, 0.96) 0.72 (0.56, 0.92) 0.84 (0.66, 1.07) First CV hospitalization 0.78 (0.64, 0.96) 0.70 (0.55, 0.91) 0.82 (0.63, 1.05) Death (any cause) 0.82 (0.54, 1.24) 0.85 (0.43, 1.68) 1.13 (0.61, 2.10) First AF/AFL recurrence4 0.80 (0.65, 0.97) 0.67 (0.53, 0.84) 0.81 (0.65, 1.02) 1Cox regression model. 2On study period, all randomized patients. 3Main reason was AF/other supraventricular rhythm disorders. 4On selected patients in sinus rhythm at baseline (AF/AFL <3 months: PBO n=514, DRO n=529; 3 to <24 months: PBO n=288, DRO n=312; ≥24 months: PBO n=252, DRO n=250). CV = Cardiovascular.

Conclusions

Nearly half the patients in ATHENA had a shorter history (<3 months) of AF/AFL prior to randomization. Patients with a longer history of AF/AFL had a greater burden of AF/AFL based on baseline rhythm status, ablation history, and cardioversions required post randomization. Despite these differences, clinical outcomes, efficacy, and safety of DRO appeared to be generally consistent irrespective of duration of AF/AFL history.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Sanofi, New York, New York, United States of America

Leydig Cell Hyperplasia Mimicking a Testicular Tumour in a Patient with Klinefelter Syndrome

Background

Klinefelter syndrome (KS) is the most common sex-chromosomal disorder in males. Frequently under-recognized, it occurs in 1 in 500-600 male births. It is caused by the inheritance of at least one additional X chromosome from either parent. Patients often have uncommon or atypical malignancies.

Patient

We describe the case of a 35-year-old man with 47XXY KS and previous cryptorchidism, presenting with a painful testicular mass. Histology confirmed Leydig cell hyperplasia.

Discussion

Cryptorchidism is an established risk factor for testicular tumours and occurs six times more commonly in KS than in the general population. Despite this, large epidemiological studies have shown a reduced burden of testicular cancer in these patients. The presentation of a hypoechoic lesion on ultrasound will prompt consideration of testicular tumours, however orchalgia represents an atypical presentation. In patients with KS, Leydig cell hyperplasia is a much more common entity and should be considered early in the differential diagnosis.

LEARNING POINTS

The differential diagnosis of a testicular mass in Klinefelter syndrome includes malignancy and nodular Leydig cell hyperplasia.Diagnosis can be challenging, both radiologically and histologically.Orchalgia is atypical in Leydig cell hyperplasia.

A two-step method for variable selection in the analysis of a case-cohort study

Background

Accurate detection and estimation of true exposure-outcome associations is important in aetiological analysis; when there are multiple potential exposure variables of interest, methods for detecting the subset of variables most likely to have true associations with the outcome of interest are required. Case-cohort studies often collect data on a large number of variables which have not been measured in the entire cohort (e.g. panels of biomarkers). There is a lack of guidance on methods for variable selection in case-cohort studies.

Methods

We describe and explore the application of three variable selection methods to data from a case-cohort study. These are: (i) selecting variables based on their level of significance in univariable (i.e. one-at-a-time) Prentice-weighted Cox regression models; (ii) stepwise selection applied to Prentice-weighted Cox regression; and (iii) a two-step method which applies a Bayesian variable selection algorithm to obtain posterior probabilities of selection for each variable using multivariable logistic regression followed by effect estimation using Prentice-weighted Cox regression.

Results

Across nine different simulation scenarios, the two-step method demonstrated higher sensitivity and lower false discovery rate than the one-at-a-time and stepwise methods. In an application of the methods to data from the EPIC-InterAct case-cohort study, the two-step method identified an additional two fatty acids as being associated with incident type 2 diabetes, compared with the one-at-a-time and stepwise methods.

Conclusions

The two-step method enables more powerful and accurate detection of exposure-outcome associations in case-cohort studies. An R package is available to enable researchers to apply this method.

A Life-Saving Palsy: Hereditary Neuropathy with Liability to Pressure Palsies (HNPP) Presenting As Hand Weakness during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Training

Aim To describe a case of acute and transient hand weakness that developed during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training. Hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP) should be considered in patients with recurrent, painless motor or sensory neuropathies at sites of peripheral nerve compression. Methods Nerve conduction studies confirmed neuropraxia of the distal ulnar nerve with a mild background demyelinating peripheral neuropathy. Results A positive family history emerged and HNPP was confirmed by genetic testing. HNPP is most reliably diagnosed by molecular testing for peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) gene deletion or point mutation on chromosome 17p11.2. Conclusion CPR, a procedure carried out by medical professionals on a daily basis, is a high-energy manual task and provides multiple opportunities for nerve compression. This case demonstrates the importance of having a high index of clinical suspicion of this disorder in patients. Recognising a diagnosis of HNPP may prevent unnecessary surgical decompression.

Iatrogenic Bowel Injury at Exchange of Supra-Pubic Catheter

Suprapubic catheter insertion and exchange is a common urological procedure, but it is not without risks and complications. While bowel perforation is a recognised complication at suprapubic catheter insertion, it is not commonly reported at suprapubic catheter exchange. We report our experience of recognition, diagnosis and subsequent successful management of the most important complication related to suprapubic catheters.

Calcific myonecrosis: diagnostic dilemma

Calcific myonecrosis is a rare benign condition affecting mainly the muscles of a single leg compartment. It is thought to follow a history of trauma with a latent period of years. Patients present with a slowly growing mass. Differential diagnosis from a malignant tumour can be made from the history and the distinctive radiographical features of a fusiform lesion with predominantly peripheral calcifications. Magnetic resonance imaging may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis; treatment is largely symptomatic.