1
|
Graham S, Gardner K, Sebalo I, Benedetto V, Clegg A, Thornton A. Designing Community Services for People With Borderline Personality Disorder to Reduce Hospitalizations. Psychiatr Serv 2024; 75:500-503. [PMID: 38369884 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
Previous evaluations of interventions for borderline personality disorder have focused on psychotherapies. This study (N=42 patients), conducted in Liverpool, United Kingdom, reviewed the effect on out-of-area treatments (OATs) and hospital admissions of establishing a local case management team and a combined day treatment and crisis service for patients who are too dysregulated to access typical office-based psychotherapy. Data from 12, 24, and 36 months postintervention were compared with baseline data. All patients in OATs were repatriated to the local community. No new patients were sent to OATs. Admissions decreased (at 12 months, 49%; 24 months, 64%; 36 months, 74%), achieving savings in hospitalization costs. Moderate increases in the use and costs of some other services were observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Graham
- Spring House Psychotherapy and Personality Disorder Service (Graham) and Ashworth Research Centre, Ashworth High Secure Hospital (Sebalo), Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; School of Psychology and Humanities (Gardner, Sebalo, Thornton) and Applied Health Research Hub (Benedetto, Clegg), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Gardner
- Spring House Psychotherapy and Personality Disorder Service (Graham) and Ashworth Research Centre, Ashworth High Secure Hospital (Sebalo), Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; School of Psychology and Humanities (Gardner, Sebalo, Thornton) and Applied Health Research Hub (Benedetto, Clegg), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Ivan Sebalo
- Spring House Psychotherapy and Personality Disorder Service (Graham) and Ashworth Research Centre, Ashworth High Secure Hospital (Sebalo), Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; School of Psychology and Humanities (Gardner, Sebalo, Thornton) and Applied Health Research Hub (Benedetto, Clegg), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Valerio Benedetto
- Spring House Psychotherapy and Personality Disorder Service (Graham) and Ashworth Research Centre, Ashworth High Secure Hospital (Sebalo), Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; School of Psychology and Humanities (Gardner, Sebalo, Thornton) and Applied Health Research Hub (Benedetto, Clegg), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Spring House Psychotherapy and Personality Disorder Service (Graham) and Ashworth Research Centre, Ashworth High Secure Hospital (Sebalo), Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; School of Psychology and Humanities (Gardner, Sebalo, Thornton) and Applied Health Research Hub (Benedetto, Clegg), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Abigail Thornton
- Spring House Psychotherapy and Personality Disorder Service (Graham) and Ashworth Research Centre, Ashworth High Secure Hospital (Sebalo), Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom; School of Psychology and Humanities (Gardner, Sebalo, Thornton) and Applied Health Research Hub (Benedetto, Clegg), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Crocker TF, Ensor J, Lam N, Jordão M, Bajpai R, Bond M, Forster A, Riley RD, Andre D, Brundle C, Ellwood A, Green J, Hale M, Mirza L, Morgan J, Patel I, Patetsini E, Prescott M, Ramiz R, Todd O, Walford R, Gladman J, Clegg A. Community based complex interventions to sustain independence in older people: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2024; 384:e077764. [PMID: 38514079 PMCID: PMC10955723 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesise evidence of the effectiveness of community based complex interventions, grouped according to their intervention components, to sustain independence for older people. DESIGN Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, clinicaltrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception to 9 August 2021 and reference lists of included studies. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials or cluster randomised controlled trials with ≥24 weeks' follow-up studying community based complex interventions for sustaining independence in older people (mean age ≥65 years) living at home, with usual care, placebo, or another complex intervention as comparators. MAIN OUTCOMES Living at home, activities of daily living (personal/instrumental), care home placement, and service/economic outcomes at 12 months. DATA SYNTHESIS Interventions were grouped according to a specifically developed typology. Random effects network meta-analysis estimated comparative effects; Cochrane's revised tool (RoB 2) structured risk of bias assessment. Grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) network meta-analysis structured certainty assessment. RESULTS The review included 129 studies (74 946 participants). Nineteen intervention components, including "multifactorial action from individualised care planning" (a process of multidomain assessment and management leading to tailored actions), were identified in 63 combinations. For living at home, compared with no intervention/placebo, evidence favoured multifactorial action from individualised care planning including medication review and regular follow-ups (routine review) (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.59; moderate certainty); multifactorial action from individualised care planning including medication review without regular follow-ups (2.55, 0.61 to 10.60; low certainty); combined cognitive training, medication review, nutritional support, and exercise (1.93, 0.79 to 4.77; low certainty); and combined activities of daily living training, nutritional support, and exercise (1.79, 0.67 to 4.76; low certainty). Risk screening or the addition of education and self-management strategies to multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review may reduce odds of living at home. For instrumental activities of daily living, evidence favoured multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review (standardised mean difference 0.11, 95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.21; moderate certainty). Two interventions may reduce instrumental activities of daily living: combined activities of daily living training, aids, and exercise; and combined activities of daily living training, aids, education, exercise, and multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review and self-management strategies. For personal activities of daily living, evidence favoured combined exercise, multifactorial action from individualised care planning, and routine review with medication review and self-management strategies (0.16, -0.51 to 0.82; low certainty). For homecare recipients, evidence favoured addition of multifactorial action from individualised care planning and routine review with medication review (0.60, 0.32 to 0.88; low certainty). High risk of bias and imprecise estimates meant that most evidence was low or very low certainty. Few studies contributed to each comparison, impeding evaluation of inconsistency and frailty. CONCLUSIONS The intervention most likely to sustain independence is individualised care planning including medicines optimisation and regular follow-up reviews resulting in multifactorial action. Homecare recipients may particularly benefit from this intervention. Unexpectedly, some combinations may reduce independence. Further research is needed to investigate which combinations of interventions work best for different participants and contexts. REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42019162195.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Crocker
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Joie Ensor
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Natalie Lam
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Magda Jordão
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ram Bajpai
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Matthew Bond
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Richard D Riley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Deirdre Andre
- Research Support Team, Leeds University Library, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Caroline Brundle
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Alison Ellwood
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - John Green
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Matthew Hale
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Lubena Mirza
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Jessica Morgan
- Geriatric Medicine, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ismail Patel
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Eleftheria Patetsini
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Matthew Prescott
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ridha Ramiz
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Oliver Todd
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Rebecca Walford
- Geriatric Medicine, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - John Gladman
- Centre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Academic Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Health Care of Older People, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Twamley J, Hamer O, Hill J, Kenyon R, Twamley H, Casey R, Zhang J, Williams A, Clegg A. Exploring the perceptions of former ICU patients and clinical staff on barriers and facilitators to the implementation of virtual reality exposure therapy: A qualitative study. Nurs Crit Care 2024; 29:313-324. [PMID: 36458458 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Virtual reality (VR) as a digital technology has developed rapidly, becoming more realistic, portable, sensory and easier to navigate. Although studies have found VR to be effective for many clinical applications, patients and clinicians have described several barriers to the successful implementation of this technology. To remove barriers for implementation of VR in health care, a greater understanding is needed of how VR can integrate into clinical environments, particularly complex settings such as an intensive care unit. AIM This study aimed to explore the perceived barriers and facilitators for the implementation of VR exposure therapy for intensive care patients and clinical staff. STUDY DESIGN A qualitative study using an Interpretative Description approach was undertaken. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 13 participants: nine patients and four health care professionals. Focus groups explored barriers and facilitators of using virtual reality (VR) exposure therapy in intensive care. Thematic analysis was employed to produce codes and themes. RESULTS In total, eight themes describing the perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing VR exposure therapy were identified. Four themes related to the perceived barriers of implementing VR exposure therapy in intensive care were identified: psychological, sensory, environmental and staff competency and confidence. There were a further four themes related to the perceived facilitators to the implementation of VR exposure therapy: staff training, patient capacity, orientation to technology and support during the intervention. CONCLUSIONS This study identified novel barriers and facilitators that could be expected when implementing VR exposure therapy for patients' post-intensive care unit stay. The findings suggest that psychological barriers of fear and apprehension were expected to provoke patient avoidance of exposure therapy. Perceived barriers for staff focused on preparedness to deliver the VR exposure therapy and a lack of technological competence. Both patients and staff stated that a comprehensive induction, orientation and training could facilitate VR exposure therapy, improving engagement. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE This study has identified that with appropriate staff training, resources, and integration into current patient care pathways, VR exposure therapy may be a valuable intervention to support patient recovery following critical illness. Prior to undertaking VR exposure therapy, patients often need reassurance that side-effects can be managed, and that they can easily control their virtual exposure experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Twamley
- Centre for Health Research and Innovation, NIHR Lancashire Clinical Research Facility, Chorley, UK
| | - Oliver Hamer
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - James Hill
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Roger Kenyon
- Critical care survivor, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Huw Twamley
- Intensive Care Department, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, UK
| | - Rob Casey
- Digital Therapy Solutions to empower Stroke, Dementia, Parkinson's Rehabilitation, DancingMind Pte Ltd, London, England, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandra Williams
- Intensive Care Department, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chorley, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hill JE, Harris C, Clegg A. Methods for using Bing's AI-powered search engine for data extraction for a systematic review. Res Synth Methods 2024; 15:347-353. [PMID: 38066713 DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Data extraction is a time-consuming and resource-intensive task in the systematic review process. Natural language processing (NLP) artificial intelligence (AI) techniques have the potential to automate data extraction saving time and resources, accelerating the review process, and enhancing the quality and reliability of extracted data. In this paper, we propose a method for using Bing AI and Microsoft Edge as a second reviewer to verify and enhance data items first extracted by a single human reviewer. We describe a worked example of the steps involved in instructing the Bing AI Chat tool to extract study characteristics as data items from a PDF document into a table so that they can be compared with data extracted manually. We show that this technique may provide an additional verification process for data extraction where there are limited resources available or for novice reviewers. However, it should not be seen as a replacement to already established and validated double independent data extraction methods without further evaluation and verification. Use of AI techniques for data extraction in systematic reviews should be transparently and accurately described in reports. Future research should focus on the accuracy, efficiency, completeness, and user experience of using Bing AI for data extraction compared with traditional methods using two or more reviewers independently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Edward Hill
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Catherine Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Archer L, Relton SD, Akbari A, Best K, Bucknall M, Conroy S, Hattle M, Hollinghurst J, Humphrey S, Lyons RA, Richards S, Walters K, West R, van der Windt D, Riley RD, Clegg A. Development and external validation of the eFalls tool: a multivariable prediction model for the risk of ED attendance or hospitalisation with a fall or fracture in older adults. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae057. [PMID: 38520142 PMCID: PMC10960070 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls are common in older adults and can devastate personal independence through injury such as fracture and fear of future falls. Methods to identify people for falls prevention interventions are currently limited, with high risks of bias in published prediction models. We have developed and externally validated the eFalls prediction model using routinely collected primary care electronic health records (EHR) to predict risk of emergency department attendance/hospitalisation with fall or fracture within 1 year. METHODS Data comprised two independent, retrospective cohorts of adults aged ≥65 years: the population of Wales, from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage Databank (model development); the population of Bradford and Airedale, England, from Connected Bradford (external validation). Predictors included electronic frailty index components, supplemented with variables informed by literature reviews and clinical expertise. Fall/fracture risk was modelled using multivariable logistic regression with a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator penalty. Predictive performance was assessed through calibration, discrimination and clinical utility. Apparent, internal-external cross-validation and external validation performance were assessed across general practices and in clinically relevant subgroups. RESULTS The model's discrimination performance (c-statistic) was 0.72 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.68 to 0.76) on internal-external cross-validation and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.83) on external validation. Calibration was variable across practices, with some over-prediction in the validation population (calibration-in-the-large, -0.87; 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.78). Clinical utility on external validation was improved after recalibration. CONCLUSION The eFalls prediction model shows good performance and could support proactive stratification for falls prevention services if appropriately embedded into primary care EHR systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Archer
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samuel D Relton
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ashley Akbari
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Kate Best
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Simon Conroy
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Miriam Hattle
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joe Hollinghurst
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Sara Humphrey
- Bradford District and Craven Health and Care Partnership, Bradford, UK
| | - Ronan A Lyons
- Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Suzanne Richards
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Richard D Riley
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lam N, Green J, Hallas S, Forster A, Crocker TF, Andre D, Ellwood A, Clegg A, Brown L. Mapping review of pain management programmes and psychological therapies for community-dwelling older people living with pain. Eur Geriatr Med 2024; 15:33-45. [PMID: 37853269 PMCID: PMC10876761 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00871-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Persistent pain is common in older people and people living with frailty. Pain or the impact of pain on everyday life is potentially modifiable. We sought to map research evidence and information from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pain management programmes and psychological therapies targeting community-dwelling older people, and explore appropriate strategies and interventions for managing or reducing the negative impact of pain for older people, particularly those with frailty. METHOD A mapping review of pain management programmes and psychological therapies for community-dwelling older people living with chronic pain. We searched for systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials and for individual randomised controlled trials and extracted data from eligible studies. RESULTS Searches resulted in 3419 systematic review records and 746 RCT records from which there were 33 eligible interventions identified in 31 eligible RCTs (48 reports). Broad aims of the interventions were to: improve physical, psychological, or social functioning; adjust the effects or sensation of pain psychologically; enhance self-care with self-management skills or knowledge. Common mechanisms of change proposed were self-efficacy enhanced by self-management tasks and skills, using positive psychological skills or refocusing attention to improve responses to pain, and practising physical exercises to improve physiological well-being and reduce restrictions from pain. Content of interventions included: skills training and activity management, education, and physical exercise. Interventions were delivered in person or remotely to individuals or in groups, typically in 1-2 sessions weekly over 5-12 weeks. CONCLUSION All the evaluated interventions appeared to show potential to provide some benefits to older people. None of the included studies assessed frailty. However, some of the included interventions appear appropriate for community-dwelling older people living with both frailty and pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Lam
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - John Green
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Sarah Hallas
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Thomas F Crocker
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | | | - Alison Ellwood
- Born in Bradford, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lesley Brown
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gilbody S, Littlewood E, McMillan D, Atha L, Bailey D, Baird K, Brady S, Burke L, Chew-Graham CA, Coventry P, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Henry A, Hollingsworth K, Newbronner E, Ryde E, Shearsmith L, Wang HI, Webster J, Woodhouse R, Clegg A, Dexter-Smith S, Gentry T, Hewitt C, Hill A, Lovell K, Sloan C, Traviss-Turner G, Pratt S, Ekers D. Behavioural activation to mitigate the psychological impacts of COVID-19 restrictions on older people in England and Wales (BASIL+): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet Healthy Longev 2024; 5:e97-e107. [PMID: 38310902 PMCID: PMC10834375 DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(23)00238-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older adults were more likely to be socially isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic, with increased risk of depression and loneliness. We aimed to investigate whether a behavioural activation intervention delivered via telephone could mitigate depression and loneliness in at-risk older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS BASIL+ (Behavioural Activation in Social Isolation) was a pragmatic randomised controlled trial conducted among patients recruited from general practices in England and Wales, and was designed to assess the effectiveness of behavioural activation in mitigating depression and loneliness among older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligible participants were aged 65 years and older, socially isolated, with a score of 5 or higher on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and had multiple long-term conditions. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention (behavioural activation) or control groups by use of simple randomisation without stratification. Behavioural activation was delivered by telephone; participants were offered up to eight weekly sessions with trained BASIL+ Support Workers. Behavioural activation was adapted to maintain social connections and encourage socially reinforcing activities. Participants in the control group received usual care with existing COVID-19 wellbeing resources. The primary clinical outcome was self-reported depression severity, assessed by the PHQ-9, at 3 months. Outcomes were assessed masked to allocation and analysis was by treatment allocation. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN63034289). FINDINGS Between Feb 8, 2021, and Feb 28, 2022, 449 eligible participants were identified and 435 from 26 general practices were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to the behavioural activation intervention (n=218) or to the control group (usual care with signposting; n=217). The mean age of participants was 75·7 years (SD 6·7); 270 (62·1%) of 435 participants were female, and 418 (96·1%) were White. Participants in the intervention group attended an average of 5·2 (SD 2·9) of eight remote behavioural activation sessions. The adjusted mean difference in PHQ-9 scores between the control and intervention groups at 3 months was -1·65 (95% CI -2·54 to -0·75, p=0·0003). No adverse events were reported that were attributable to the behavioural activation intervention. INTERPRETATION Behavioural activation is an effective and potentially scalable intervention that can reduce symptoms of depression and emotional loneliness in at-risk groups in the short term. The findings of this trial add to the range of strategies to improve the mental health of older adults with multiple long-term conditions. These results can be helpful to policy makers beyond the pandemic in reducing the global burden of depression and addressing the health impacts of loneliness, particularly in at-risk groups. FUNDING UK National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Littlewood
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Dean McMillan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Lucy Atha
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Della Bailey
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Kalpita Baird
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Samantha Brady
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Lauren Burke
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | - Peter Coventry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Henry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Kelly Hollingsworth
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | - Eloise Ryde
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | - Han-I Wang
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Clegg
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sarah Dexter-Smith
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew Hill
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Sloan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | - David Ekers
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK; Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Research & Development, Flatts Lane Centre, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gordon C, Davidson CE, Roffe C, Clegg A, Booth J, Lightbody CE, Harris C, Sohani A, Watkins C. Evaluating methods of detecting and determining the type of urinary incontinence in adults after stroke: A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn 2024; 43:364-381. [PMID: 38078643 DOI: 10.1002/nau.25330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Urinary incontinence (UI) affects over half of people with stroke. It is unclear which methods are accurate in assessing presence and type of UI to inform clinical management. Diagnosis of UI based on inaccurate methods may lead to unnecessary interventions. The aims of this systematic review were to identify, for adults with stroke, clinically accurate methods to determine the presence of UI and type of UI. METHOD We searched seven electronic databases and additional conference proceedings. To be included, studies had to be primary research comparing two or more methods, or use a reference test. RESULTS We identified 3846 studies with eight eligible for inclusion. We identified 11 assessment methods within the eight studies. Only five studies had sufficient comparator data for synthesis. Due to heterogeneity of data, results on the following methods were narratively synthesized: Core Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Score (CLSS), clinical history and physical examination, Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index, International Consultation Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICiQ-SF) and urodynamic studies (UDS). Most studies were small and of low to medium quality. All reported differences in sensitivity, and none compared the same assessment methods. CONCLUSION Current evidence is insufficient to support recommendations on the most accurate UI assessment for adults with stroke. Further research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Gordon
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Stroke Service, Department of Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | | | - Christine Roffe
- School of Medicine and Neurosciences, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
- Stroke Service, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Joanne Booth
- Institute for Applied Health Research, School of Halth and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Catherine Harris
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Amin Sohani
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Caroline Watkins
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Best K, Todd O, Clegg A. Are frailty measurements derived using electronic health records fit for clinical use? Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae001. [PMID: 38300724 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Best
- Academic Unit of Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute of Health Research, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Oliver Todd
- Academic Unit of Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute of Health Research, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit of Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute of Health Research, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Taylor E, Goodwin VA, Ball S, Clegg A, Brown L, Frost J. Older Adults' Perspectives of Independence Through Time: Results of a Longitudinal Interview Study. Gerontologist 2024; 64:gnad073. [PMID: 37330641 PMCID: PMC10825833 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnad073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Understanding how older people experience independence has implications for person-centered care. Existing understanding of older people's experience of independence, generated through methods that provide a "snapshot" view of a person's independence at a given time point, provides little insight into the process of maintaining independence through time. The aim of this study was to explore older participants' perceptions to understand the processes and resources that were most important for maintaining independence. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Two semistructured interviews were conducted longitudinally to explore the perspectives of 12 community-dwelling, older people, aged 76-85 years. A social constructivist approach, using dramaturgical and descriptive codes, facilitated the interpretation of the data. Sixteen analytical questions guided the exploration of participants' perceptions of independence through time. RESULTS Older people suggested that objective representations underestimated, and omitted, important aspects of their independence through time. Some participants perceived "snapshot" judgments of their independence as insensitive to their individual values and context. Change over time required some participants to adapt their methods for maintaining independence. The stability of participants' sense of independence was value dependent and informed by the purpose a participant ascribed to maintaining independence. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS This study augments the understanding of independence as a complex and multifaceted construct. The findings challenge the congruence of common interpretations of independence with older people's views, showing areas of commonality, and discrepancy. Exploration of independence in terms of form and function provides an important understanding of how function takes precedence to form in determining the maintenance of independence through time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Taylor
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Susan Ball
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Lesley Brown
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Julia Frost
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bray EP, Georgiou RF, Hives L, Iqbal N, Benedetto V, Spencer J, Harris C, Clegg A, Williams N, Rutter P, Watkins C. Non-pharmacological interventions for the reduction and maintenance of blood pressure in people with prehypertension: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078189. [PMID: 38253457 PMCID: PMC10806604 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prehypertension is defined as blood pressure that is above the normal range but not high enough to be classed as hypertension. Prehypertension is a warning of development of hypertension as well as a risk for cardiovascular disease, heart attack and stroke. In the UK, non-pharmacological interventions are recommended for prehypertension management but no reviews have focused on the effectiveness of these types of interventions solely in people with prehypertension. Therefore, the proposed systematic review will assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in reducing or maintaining blood pressure in prehypertensive people. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This systematic review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The databases/trial registries that will be searched to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and economic evaluations include Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Scopus and the International HTA Database. Search terms have been identified by the team including an information specialist. Three reviewers will be involved in the study selection process. Risk of bias will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the Consensus Health Economic Criteria list for economic evaluations. Findings from the included studies will be tabulated and synthesised narratively. Heterogeneity will be assessed through visual inspection of forest plots and the calculation of the χ2 and I2 statistics and causes of heterogeneity will be assessed where sufficient data are available. If possible, we plan to investigate differential effects on specific subgroups and from different types of interventions using meta-regression. Where relevant, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) will be used to assess the certainty of the evidence found. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not needed. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, disseminated via the wider study website and shared with the study sites and participants. REGISTRATION DETAILS The review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420232433047).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma P Bray
- Stroke Research Team, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | | | - Lucy Hives
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Nafisa Iqbal
- Stroke Research Team, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Valerio Benedetto
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Joseph Spencer
- Research Facilitation and Delivery Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Cath Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Nefyn Williams
- Primary Care, Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Rutter
- Pharmacy Practice, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Caroline Watkins
- Stroke Research Team, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Graham L, Brundle C, Harrison N, Andre D, Clegg A, Forster A, Spilsbury K. What are the priorities for research of older people living in their own home, including those living with frailty? A systematic review and content analysis of studies reporting older people's priorities and unmet needs. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afad232. [PMID: 38243402 PMCID: PMC10798941 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence regarding the needs of older people, including those living with frailty, to inform research priority setting. OBJECTIVES This systematic review aimed to identify the range of research priorities of community-dwelling older people living in their own home, including those living with frailty. METHODS Included studies were from economically developed countries and designed to identify the priorities for research or unmet needs of community-dwelling older people. Studies were excluded if they described priorities relating to specific health conditions. Medline, Embase, PsycInfo and CINAHL were searched (January 2010-June 2022), alongside grey literature. Study quality was assessed, but studies were not excluded on the basis of quality. A bespoke data extraction form was used and content analysis undertaken to synthesise findings. RESULTS Seventy-five reports were included. Seven explicitly aimed to identify the priorities or unmet needs of frail older people; 68 did not specify frailty as a characteristic. Study designs varied, including priority setting exercises, surveys, interviews, focus groups and literature reviews. Identified priorities and unmet needs were organised into themes: prevention and management, improving health and care service provision, improving daily life, meeting carers' needs and planning ahead. DISCUSSION Many priority areas were raised by older people, carers and health/care professionals, but few were identified explicitly by/for frail older people. An overarching need was identified for tailored, collaborative provision of care and support. CONCLUSION Review findings provide a valuable resource for researchers and health/care staff wishing to focus their research or service provision on areas of importance for older people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Graham
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Caroline Brundle
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Nicola Harrison
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heaven A, Bower P, Day F, Farrin A, Fernadez C, Foster M, Foy R, Hawkins R, Hulme C, Humphrey S, Lawton R, Parker C, Thompson E, West R, Clegg A. PeRsOnaliSed care Planning for oldER people with frailty (PROSPER): protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2024; 25:8. [PMID: 38167481 PMCID: PMC10759371 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07857-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty is common in older age and is characterised by loss of biological reserves across multiple organ systems. These changes associated with frailty mean older people can be vulnerable to sudden, dramatic changes in health because of relatively small problems. Older people with frailty are at increased risk of adverse outcomes including disability, hospitalisation, and care home admission, with associated reduction in quality of life and increased NHS and social care costs. Personalised Care Planning offers an anticipatory, preventative approach to supporting older adults to live independently for longer, but it has not been robustly evaluated in a population of older adults with frailty. METHODS Following an initial feasibility study, this multi-centre, individually randomised controlled trial aims to establish whether personalised care planning for older people improves health-related quality of life. It will recruit 1337 participants from general practices across Yorkshire and Humber and Mid-Mersey in the North of England. Eligible patients will be aged 65 and over with an electronic frailty index score of 0.21 or above, living in their own homes, without severe cognitive impairment and not in receipt of end-of-life care. Following confirmation of eligibility, informed consent and baseline data collection, participants will be individually randomised to the PeRsOnaliSed care Planning for oldER people with frailty (PROSPER) intervention or usual care in a 2.6:1 allocation ratio. Participants will not be blinded to allocation, but data collection and analysis will be blinded. The intervention will be delivered over 12 weeks by a Personal Independence Co-ordinator worker based within a voluntary sector organisation, Age UK. The primary outcomes are health-related quality of life, measured using both the physical and mental components of the Short-Form 12 Item Health Questionnaire at 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes comprise activities of daily living, self-management capabilities and loneliness, admission to care homes, hospitalisations, and health and social care resource use at 12 months post randomisation. Parallel cost-effectiveness and process evaluations will be conducted alongside the trial. DISCUSSION The PROSPER study will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a personalised care planning approach for older people with frailty and inform the process of its implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN16123291 . Registered on 28 August 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Heaven
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK.
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK
| | - Florence Day
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Catherine Fernadez
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Marilyn Foster
- PPI Representative, c/o Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Rebecca Hawkins
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Claire Hulme
- Health Economics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK
| | - Sara Humphrey
- OPMH & Dementia at Yorkshire and Humber Clinical Network, Rotherham, UK
| | - Rebecca Lawton
- School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Catriona Parker
- Cancer Clinical Trial Centre, Weston Park Cancer Centre, Whitham Road, Sheffield, S10 2SJ, UK
| | - Ellen Thompson
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Robert West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, BD9 6RJ, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hamer O, Bray EP, Harris C, Blundell A, Kuroski JA, Schneider E, Watkins C, Clegg A. Psychological interventions for weight reduction and sustained weight reduction in adults with overweight and obesity: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075364. [PMID: 38149427 PMCID: PMC10711885 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Overweight and obesity are growing public health problems worldwide. Both diet and physical activity have been the primary interventions for weight reduction over the past decade. With increasing rates of overweight and obesity, it is evident that a primary focus on diet and exercise has not resulted in sustained obesity reduction within the global population. There is now a case to explore other weight management strategies, focusing on psychological factors that may underpin overweight and obesity. Psychological therapy interventions are gaining recognition for their effectiveness in addressing underlying emotional factors and promoting weight loss. However, there is a dearth of literature that has mapped the types of psychological interventions and the characteristics of these interventions as a means of achieving weight reduction and sustained weight reduction in adults with overweight or obesity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The review will combine the methodology outlined by Arksey and O'Malley with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A total of six databases will be searched using a comprehensive search strategy. Intervention studies will be included if participants are 18 years and over, classified as overweight or obese (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2), and have received a psychological therapy intervention. The review will exclude studies that are not available in English, not full text, none peer reviewed or combine a lifestyle and/or pharmacological intervention with a psychological intervention. Data will be synthesised using a narrative synthesis approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required to conduct this scoping review. The findings will be disseminated through journal publication(s), social media and a lay summary for key stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emma P Bray
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Cath Harris
- University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | | | | | - Emma Schneider
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shiwani T, Relton S, Evans R, Kale A, Heaven A, Clegg A, Todd O. New Horizons in artificial intelligence in the healthcare of older people. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad219. [PMID: 38124256 PMCID: PMC10733173 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare describes algorithm-based computational techniques which manage and analyse large datasets to make inferences and predictions. There are many potential applications of AI in the care of older people, from clinical decision support systems that can support identification of delirium from clinical records to wearable devices that can predict the risk of a fall. We held four meetings of older people, clinicians and AI researchers. Three priority areas were identified for AI application in the care of older people. These included: monitoring and early diagnosis of disease, stratified care and care coordination between healthcare providers. However, the meetings also highlighted concerns that AI may exacerbate health inequity for older people through bias within AI models, lack of external validation amongst older people, infringements on privacy and autonomy, insufficient transparency of AI models and lack of safeguarding for errors. Creating effective interventions for older people requires a person-centred approach to account for the needs of older people, as well as sufficient clinical and technological governance to meet standards of generalisability, transparency and effectiveness. Education of clinicians and patients is also needed to ensure appropriate use of AI technologies, with investment in technological infrastructure required to ensure equity of access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha Shiwani
- Academic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Samuel Relton
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Ruth Evans
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Aditya Kale
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation & Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anne Heaven
- Academic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Oliver Todd
- Academic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Duckworth Lane, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD9 6RJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Frost R, Avgerinou C, Kalwarowsky S, Mahmood F, Goodman C, Clegg A, Hopkins J, Gould R, Gardner B, Marston L, Hunter R, Kharicha K, Cooper C, Skelton DA, Drennan V, Logan P, Walters K. Enabling health and maintaining independence for older people at home (HomeHealth trial): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2023; 402 Suppl 1:S42. [PMID: 37997084 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02071-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND NHS frailty services commonly target more severely frail older people, despite evidence suggesting frailty can be prevented or reversed when addressed at an earlier stage. HomeHealth is a new home-based, manualised voluntary sector service supporting older people with mild frailty to maintain their independence through behaviour change. Over six appointments, a trained HomeHealth worker discusses what matters to the older person and supports them to set and achieve goals around mobility, nutrition, socialising and/or psychological wellbeing. The service showed promising effects in a feasibility trial. We aimed to test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of HomeHealth for maintaining independence in older people with mild frailty compared with treatment as usual. METHODS In this single-blind multicentre randomised controlled trial, we recruited community-dwelling older people aged 65 years or older with mild frailty from 27 general practices, community groups and sheltered housing in London, Yorkshire, and Hertfordshire. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either HomeHealth monthly for 6 months or treatment as usual (usual GP and outpatient care, no specific frailty services). Our primary outcome was independence in activities of daily living, measured by blinded outcome assessors using the modified Barthel Index, and analysed using linear mixed models, including 6-month and 12-month data and controlling for baseline Barthel score and site. The study was approved by the Social Care Research Ethics Committee, and all participants provided written or orally recorded informed consent. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN54268283. FINDINGS This trial took place between Jan 18, 2021, and July 4, 2023. We recruited 388 participants (mean age 81·4 years; 64% female [n=250], 94% White British/European [n=364], 2·5% Asian [n=10], 1·5% Black [n=6], 2·0% other [n=8]). We achieved high retention for 6-month follow-up (89%, 345/388), 12-month follow-up (86%, 334/388), and medical notes data (89%, 347/388). 182 (93%) of 195 participants in the intervention group completed the intervention, attending a mean of 5·6 appointments. HomeHealth had no effect on Barthel Index scores at 12 months (mean difference 0·250, 95% CI -0·932 to 1·432). At 6 months, there was a small reduction in psychological distress (-1·237, -2·127 to -0·348) and frailty (-0·124, -0·232 to -0·017), and at 12 months, we found small positive effects on wellbeing (1·449, 0·124 to 2·775) in those receiving HomeHealth. Other outcomes in analysis to date showed no significant difference. Health economic outcomes (including quality of life, capability, health services use and care needs or burden) are pending. INTERPRETATION This high-quality trial showed that HomeHealth did not maintain independence in older people with mild frailty, and had limited effects upon secondary outcomes. Future studies need to explore different ways to promote health in this population. FUNDING National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Frost
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christina Avgerinou
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Kalwarowsky
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Farah Mahmood
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | | | - Rebecca Gould
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Louise Marston
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachael Hunter
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Kalpa Kharicha
- NIHR Policy Research Unit in Health and Social Care Workforce, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Claudia Cooper
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Dawn A Skelton
- Department of Physiotherapy and Paramedicine, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Vari Drennan
- Centre for Health and Social Care Research, St George's University, London, UK
| | - Pip Logan
- Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Crocker TF, Lam N, Jordão M, Brundle C, Prescott M, Forster A, Ensor J, Gladman J, Clegg A. Risk-of-bias assessment using Cochrane's revised tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) was useful but challenging and resource-intensive: observations from a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 161:39-45. [PMID: 37364620 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report our experience using version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING Two reviewers independently applied RoB 2 to results of interest in a large systematic review of complex interventions and reached consensus. We recorded the time taken, and noted and discussed our difficulties using the tool, and the resolutions we adopted. We explored the time taken with regression analysis and summarized our experience of implementing the tool. RESULTS We assessed risk of bias in 860 results of interest in 113 studies. Staff resource averaged 358 minutes per study (SD 183). Number of results (β = 22) and reports (β = 14) per study and experience of the team (β = -6) significantly affected assessment time. To implement the tool consistently, we developed cut points for missingness and considerations of balance regarding missingness, assumed some concerns with intervention deviations unless otherwise prevented or investigated, some concerns with measurements from unblinded self-reporting participants, and judged low risk of selection for certain dichotomous outcomes despite the absence of an analysis plan. CONCLUSION The RoB 2 tool and guidance are useful but resource-intensive and challenging to implement. Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines should detail risk of bias implementation. Improved guidance focusing on implementation could assist reviewers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Frederick Crocker
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
| | - Natalie Lam
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Magda Jordão
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Caroline Brundle
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Matthew Prescott
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Joie Ensor
- Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - John Gladman
- Centre for Rehabilitation & Ageing Research, Academic Unit of Injury, Inflammation and Recovery Sciences, University of Nottingham and Health Care of Older People, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Braithwaite E, Todd OM, Atkin A, Hulatt R, Tadrous R, Alldred DP, Pirmohamed M, Walker L, Lawton R, Clegg A. Interventions for reducing anticholinergic medication burden in older adults-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad176. [PMID: 37740900 PMCID: PMC10517713 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 09/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anticholinergic medications block the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in the brain and peripheral nervous system. Many medications have anticholinergic properties, and the cumulative effect of these medications is termed anticholinergic burden. Increased anticholinergic burden can have short-term side effects such as dry mouth, blurred vision and urinary retention as well as long-term effects including dementia, worsening physical function and falls. METHODS We carried out a systematic review (SR) with meta-analysis (MA) looking at randomised controlled trials addressing interventions to reduce anticholinergic burden in older adults. RESULTS We identified seven papers suitable for inclusion in our SR and MA. Interventions included multi-disciplinary involvement in medication reviews and deprescribing of AC medications. Pooled data revealed no significant difference in outcomes between control and intervention group for falls (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.52-1.11, n = 647), cognition (mean difference = 1.54, 95% CI: -0.04 to 3.13, n = 405), anticholinergic burden (mean difference = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.11 to 0.18, n = 710) or quality of life (mean difference = 0.04, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.12, n = 461). DISCUSSION Overall, there was no significant difference with interventions to reduce anticholinergic burden. As we did not see a significant change in anticholinergic burden scores following interventions, it is likely other outcomes would not change. Short follow-up time and lack of training and support surrounding successful deprescribing may have contributed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Braithwaite
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Oliver M Todd
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Abigail Atkin
- Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Foundation Trust, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Rachel Hulatt
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ragy Tadrous
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David P Alldred
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Yorkshire & Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford, UK
| | - Munir Pirmohamed
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lauren Walker
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7DE, UK
| | - Rebecca Lawton
- Institute of Psychological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Quality and Safety Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hill JE, Whitaker JC, Sharafi N, Hamer O, Chohan A, Harris C, Clegg A. The effectiveness and safety of heat/cold therapy in adults with lymphoedema: systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2023:1-12. [PMID: 37431170 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2231842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of using heat and cold therapy for adults with lymphoedema. METHODS A multi-database search was undertaken. Only studies which included adults with lymphoedema who were treated with heat or cold therapy reporting any outcome were included. Screening, data extraction, and assessment of bias were undertaken by a single reviewer and verified by a second. Due to the substantial heterogeneity, a descriptive synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included. All nine studies which assessed the effects of heat-therapy on changes in limb circumference reported a point estimate indicating some reduction from baseline to end of study. Similarly, the five studies evaluating the use of heat-therapy on limb volume demonstrated a reduction in limb volume from baseline to end-of-study. Only four studies reported adverse events of which all were deemed to be minor. Only two studies explored the effects of cold therapy on lymphoedema. CONCLUSIONS Tentative evidence suggests heat-therapy may have some benefit in treating lymphoedema with minimal side effects. However, further high-quality randomised controlled trials are required, with a particular focus on moderating factors and assessment of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Hill
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - J C Whitaker
- Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - N Sharafi
- Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - O Hamer
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - A Chohan
- Allied Health Research Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - C Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - A Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cheong VL, Mehdizadeh D, Todd OM, Gardner P, Zaman H, Clegg A, Alldred DP, Faisal M. The extent of anticholinergic burden across an older Welsh population living with frailty: cross-sectional analysis of general practice records. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad136. [PMID: 37505992 PMCID: PMC10378723 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anticholinergic medicines are associated with adverse outcomes for older people. However, little is known about their use in frailty. The objectives were to (i) investigate the prevalence of anticholinergic prescribing for older patients, and (ii) examine anticholinergic burden according to frailty status. METHODS Cross-sectional analysis of Welsh primary care data from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank including patients aged ≥65 at their first GP consultation between 1 January and 31 December 2018. Frailty was identified using the electronic Frailty Index and anticholinergic burden using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression were conducted to (i) describe the type and frequency of anticholinergics prescribed; and (ii) to estimate the association between frailty and cumulative ACB score (ACB-Sum). RESULTS In this study of 529,095 patients, 47.4% of patients receiving any prescription medications were prescribed at least one anticholinergic medicine. Adjusted regression analysis showed that patients with increasing frailty had higher odds of having an ACB-Sum of >3 compared with patients who were fit (mild frailty, adj OR 1.062 (95%CI 1.061-1.064), moderate frailty, adj OR 1.134 (95%CI 1.131-1.136), severe frailty, adj OR 1.208 (95%CI 1.203-1.213)). CONCLUSIONS Anticholinergic prescribing was high in this older population. Older people with advancing frailty are exposed to the highest anticholinergic burden despite being the most vulnerable to the associated adverse effects. Older people with advancing frailty should be considered for medicines review to prevent overaccumulation of anticholinergic medications, given the risks of functional and cognitive decline that frailty presents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V-Lin Cheong
- Medicines Management & Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David Mehdizadeh
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford, UK
| | - Oliver M Todd
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Peter Gardner
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Hadar Zaman
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford, UK
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research (University of Leeds), Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - David P Alldred
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Muhammad Faisal
- NIHR Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Bradford, UK
- Wolfson Centre for Applied Health Research, Bradford, UK
- Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brown L, Mossabir R, Harrison N, Lam N, Grice A, Clegg A, Williams ACDC, Antcliff D, Schofield P, Suleman A, Forster A. Developing the evidence and associated service models to support older adults living with frailty to manage their pain and to reduce its impact on their lives: protocol for a mixed-method, co-design study (The POPPY Study). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074785. [PMID: 37369419 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Pain in Older People with Frailty Study is a mixed-method, co-design study, which aims to develop the content, implementation strategies, service and professional guidance to support older adults with frailty to manage their pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study has four phases: Phase 1, research evidence and information synthesis from randomised controlled trials of multicomponent pain management programmes and psychological therapies for community-dwelling older adults. Phase 2, qualitative interviews with 30 community-dwelling older adults (≥75 years) living with frailty and persistent pain, including dyadic interviews with a spouse or unpaid carer. Phase 3, qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals (HCPs) working within various pain service types; 5-8 HCPs per service and up to 12 services including primary care, secondary care, tertiary centres and services with voluntary sector input. Phase 4, co-design workshops with older adults, HCPs and commissioners. Inclusion criteria (Phase 2): community-dwelling older adults (≥75 years) living with frailty and persistent pain. Exclusion criteria (Phase 2): care home residents, a dementia or cancer diagnosis. Cancer survivors, ≥5 years cancer free, and not undergoing active cancer treatment can participate. Analysis for Phase 1 will use narrative synthesis, Phase 2 will use grounded theory analysis and Phase 3 will use thematic analysis. Oversight is provided from a patient and public involvement group and an independent steering committee. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The protocol was approved by Leeds-East Research Ethics Committee on 28 April 2022 (22/YH/0080). Consent is sought if an individual is willing to participate (Phases 2-4) and has capacity. Findings will be disseminated at conferences, in newsletters and journals and to local authorities and charities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lesley Brown
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Rahena Mossabir
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Nicola Harrison
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Natalie Lam
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Anne Grice
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda C de C Williams
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Deborah Antcliff
- Bury Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Bury Integrated Pain Service, Bury, UK
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | | | - Anne Forster
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hives L, Georgiou RF, Spencer J, Benedetto V, Clegg A, Rutter P, Watkins C, Williams N, Bray EP. Risk reduction intervention for raised blood pressure (REVERSE): protocol for a mixed-methods feasibility study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072225. [PMID: 37258072 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Around 40% of adults have pre-hypertension (blood pressure between 120-139/80-89), meaning they are at increased risk of developing hypertension and other cardiovascular disease-related conditions. There are limited studies on the management of pre-hypertension; however, guidance recommends that it should be focused on lifestyle modification rather than on medication. Self-monitoring of blood pressure could allow people to monitor and manage their risk status and may allow individuals to modify lifestyle factors. The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and acceptability, to both healthcare professionals and people with pre-hypertension, of blood pressure self-monitoring. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A prospective, non-randomised feasibility study, with a mixed-methods approach will be employed. Eligible participants (n=114) will be recruited from general practices, pharmacies and community providers across Lancashire and South Cumbria. Participants will self-monitor their blood pressure at home for 6 months and will complete questionnaires at three timepoints (baseline, 6 and 12 months). Healthcare professionals and participants involved in the study will be invited to take part in follow-up interviews and a focus group. The primary outcomes include the willingness to engage with the concept of pre-hypertension, the acceptability of self-monitoring, and the study processes. Secondary outcomes will inform the design of a potential future trial. A cost-analysis and cost-benefit analysis will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been obtained from London-Fulham NHS Research Ethics Committee, the University of Central Lancashire Health Ethics Review Panel and the HRA. The results of the study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, feedback to service users and healthcare professionals, and to professional bodies in primary care and pharmacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN13649483.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Hives
- Research Facilitation and Delivery Unit, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Rachel F Georgiou
- Stroke Research Team, School of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Joseph Spencer
- Research Facilitation and Delivery Unit, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Valerio Benedetto
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Health Technology Assessment Unit, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Rutter
- Faculty of Science and Health, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Caroline Watkins
- Stroke Research Team, School of Nursing, Facility of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Nefyn Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Emma P Bray
- Stroke Research Team, School of Nursing, Facility of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Avgerinou C, Petersen I, Clegg A, West RM, Osborn D, Walters K. Trends in incidence of recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fragility fractures in people aged 50 years and above: retrospective cohort study using UK primary care data. Osteoporos Int 2023:10.1007/s00198-023-06739-1. [PMID: 37162537 PMCID: PMC10382342 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06739-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
This study used primary care data to estimate the incidence of recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fragility fracture in the UK during 2000-2018 accounting for age, sex, calendar year and social deprivation. More than 3 million people aged 50-99 years were included. We found that men living in the most deprived areas had a 45% higher risk of being diagnosed with osteoporosis and 50% higher risk of fragility fracture compared to men living in the least deprived areas. PURPOSE a) To estimate the incidence trends of a recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fragility fracture in the UK over time; b) to describe differences according to age, sex, and social deprivation. METHODS This is a longitudinal population-based cohort study using routinely collected primary care data obtained via IQVIA Medical Research Database (IMRD). All patients aged 50-99 years registered with a practice participating in THIN (The Health Improvement Network) between 2000-2018 were included. The first recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, or fragility fracture was used to estimate incidence rates (IR) per 10,000 person-years at risk. Poisson regression was used to provide Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) adjusted by age, sex, social deprivation, calendar year, and practice effect. RESULTS The year-specific adjusted IRR of recorded osteoporosis was highest in 2009 in women [IRR 1.44(95%CI 1.38-1.50)], whereas in men it was highest in 2013-2014 [IRR 1.94(95%CI 1.72-2.18)] compared to 2000. The year-specific adjusted IRR of fragility fracture was highest in 2012 in women [IRR 1.77(95%CI 1.69-1.85)], whereas in men it was highest in 2013 [IRR 1.64(95%CI 1.51-1.78)] compared to 2000. Men in the most deprived areas had a higher risk of being diagnosed with osteoporosis [IRR 1.45(95%CI 1.38-1.53)], osteopenia [IRR 1.17(95%CI 1.09-1.26)], and fragility fracture [IRR 1.50(95%CI 1.44-1.56)] compared to those living in the least deprived areas, but smaller differences were seen in women. CONCLUSION Use of fracture risk assessment tools may enhance the detection of osteoporosis cases in primary care. Further research is needed on the effect of social deprivation on diagnosis of osteoporosis and fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Avgerinou
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
| | - Irene Petersen
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robert M West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Leeds, UK
- Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kate Walters
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Todd O, Johnson O, Wilkinson C, Hollinghurst J, Dondo TB, Yadegarfar ME, Sheppard JP, McManus RJ, Gale CP, Clegg A. Attainment of NICE blood pressure targets among older people with newly diagnosed hypertension: nationwide linked electronic health records cohort study. Age Ageing 2023; 52:7181252. [PMID: 37247403 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND it is not known if clinical practice reflects guideline recommendations for the management of hypertension in older people and whether guideline adherence varies according to overall health status. AIMS to describe the proportion of older people attaining National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline blood pressure targets within 1 year of hypertension diagnosis and determine predictors of target attainment. METHODS a nationwide cohort study of Welsh primary care data from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage databank including patients aged ≥65 years newly diagnosed with hypertension between 1st June 2011 and 1st June 2016. The primary outcome was attainment of NICE guideline blood pressure targets as measured by the latest blood pressure recording up to 1 year after diagnosis. Predictors of target attainment were investigated using logistic regression. RESULTS there were 26,392 patients (55% women, median age 71 [IQR 68-77] years) included, of which 13,939 (52.8%) attained a target blood pressure within a median follow-up of 9 months. Success in attaining target blood pressure was associated with a history of atrial fibrillation (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11, 1.43), heart failure (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.06, 1.49) and myocardial infarction (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10, 1.32), all compared to no history of each, respectively. Care home residence, the severity of frailty, and increasing co-morbidity were not associated with target attainment following adjustment for confounder variables. CONCLUSIONS blood pressure remains insufficiently controlled 1 year after diagnosis in nearly half of older people with newly diagnosed hypertension, but target attainment appears unrelated to baseline frailty, multi-morbidity or care home residence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Todd
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, England LS2 9LH, UK
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, England BD9 6RJ, UK
| | - Oliver Johnson
- School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, LS2 9LH, UK
| | - Chris Wilkinson
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, England YO10 5DD, UK
- Academic Cardiovascular Unit, South Tees NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, England TS4 3BY, UK
| | - Joe Hollinghurst
- Health Data Research UK (HDR-UK), University of Swansea, Swansea, Wales SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Tatendashe B Dondo
- Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England LS2 9LH, UK
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England LS2 9LH, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England LS2 9LH, UK
| | - Mohammad E Yadegarfar
- School of Life Course & Population Sciences, King's College London, London, England WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - James P Sheppard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Richard J McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Chris P Gale
- Leeds Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, England LS2 9LH, UK
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England LS2 9LH, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, England LS2 9LH, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, England LS2 9LH, UK
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, England BD9 6RJ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Walsh B, Fogg C, Harris S, Roderick P, de Lusignan S, England T, Clegg A, Brailsford S, Fraser SDS. Frailty transitions and prevalence in an ageing population: longitudinal analysis of primary care data from an open cohort of adults aged 50 and over in England, 2006-2017. Age Ageing 2023; 52:7147101. [PMID: 37140052 PMCID: PMC10158172 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION frailty is common in older adults and is associated with increased health and social care use. Longitudinal information is needed on population-level incidence, prevalence and frailty progression to plan services to meet future population needs. METHODS retrospective open cohort study using electronic health records of adults aged ≥50 from primary care in England, 2006-2017. Frailty was calculated annually using the electronic Frailty Index (eFI). Multistate models estimated transition rates between each frailty category, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics. Prevalence overall for each eFI category (fit, mild, moderate and severe) was calculated. RESULTS the cohort included 2,171,497 patients and 15,514,734 person-years. Frailty prevalence increased from 26.5 (2006) to 38.9% (2017). The average age of frailty onset was 69; however, 10.8% of people aged 50-64 were already frail in 2006. Estimated transitions from fit to any level of frailty were 48/1,000 person-years aged 50-64, 130/1,000 person-years aged 65-74, 214/1,000 person-years aged 75-84 and 380/1,000 person-years aged ≥ 85. Transitions were independently associated with older age, higher deprivation, female sex, Asian ethnicity and urban dwelling. Mean time spent in each frailty category decreased with age, with the longest period spent in severe frailty at all ages. CONCLUSIONS frailty is prevalent in adults aged ≥50 and time spent in successive frailty states is longer as frailty progresses, resulting in extended healthcare burden. Larger population numbers and fewer transitions in adults aged 50-64 present an opportunity for earlier identification and intervention. A large increase in frailty over 12 years highlights the urgency of informed service planning in ageing populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bronagh Walsh
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Carole Fogg
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Scott Harris
- School of Primary Care, Population Science & Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Roderick
- School of Primary Care, Population Science & Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Simon de Lusignan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tracey England
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally Brailsford
- Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Simon D S Fraser
- School of Primary Care, Population Science & Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Downe S, Nowland R, Clegg A, Akooji N, Harris C, Farrier A, Gondo LT, Finlayson K, Thomson G, Kingdon C, Mehrtash H, McCrimmon R, Tunçalp Ö. Theories for interventions to reduce physical and verbal abuse: A mixed methods review of the health and social care literature to inform future maternity care. PLOS Glob Public Health 2023; 3:e0001594. [PMID: 37093790 PMCID: PMC10124898 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Despite global attention, physical and verbal abuse remains prevalent in maternity and newborn healthcare. We aimed to establish theoretical principles for interventions to reduce such abuse. We undertook a mixed methods systematic review of health and social care literature (MEDLINE, SocINDEX, Global Index Medicus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Sept 29th 2020 and March 22nd 2022: no date or language restrictions). Papers that included theory were analysed narratively. Those with suitable outcome measures were meta-analysed. We used convergence results synthesis to integrate findings. In September 2020, 193 papers were retained (17,628 hits). 154 provided theoretical explanations; 38 were controlled studies. The update generated 39 studies (2695 hits), plus five from reference lists (12 controlled studies). A wide range of explicit and implicit theories were proposed. Eleven non-maternity controlled studies could be meta-analysed, but only for physical restraint, showing little intervention effect. Most interventions were multi-component. Synthesis suggests that a combination of systems level and behavioural change models might be effective. The maternity intervention studies could all be mapped to this approach. Two particular adverse contexts emerged; social normalisation of violence across the socio-ecological system, especially for 'othered' groups; and the belief that mistreatment is necessary to minimise clinical harm. The ethos and therefore the expression of mistreatment at each level of the system is moderated by the individuals who enact the system, through what they feel they can control, what is socially normal, and what benefits them in that context. Interventions to reduce verbal and physical abuse in maternity care should be locally tailored, and informed by theories encompassing all socio-ecological levels, and the psychological and emotional responses of individuals working within them. Attention should be paid to social normalisation of violence against 'othered' groups, and to the belief that intrapartum maternal mistreatment can optimise safe outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soo Downe
- Research in Childbirth and Health Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Nowland
- Maternal and Infant Nurture and Nutrition Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluations and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Naseerah Akooji
- Lancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Cath Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluations and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Alan Farrier
- Healthy and Sustainable Settings Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | | | - Kenny Finlayson
- Research in Childbirth and Health Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Gill Thomson
- Maternal and Infant Nurture and Nutrition Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Carol Kingdon
- Research in Childbirth and Health Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Hedieh Mehrtash
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Rebekah McCrimmon
- School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Özge Tunçalp
- UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sheppard JP, Koshiaris C, Stevens R, Lay-Flurrie S, Banerjee A, Bellows BK, Clegg A, Hobbs FDR, Payne RA, Swain S, Usher-Smith JA, McManus RJ. The association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events by age and frailty: A cohort study. PLoS Med 2023; 20:e1004223. [PMID: 37075078 PMCID: PMC10155987 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antihypertensives are effective at reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, but limited data exist quantifying their association with serious adverse events, particularly in older people with frailty. This study aimed to examine this association using nationally representative electronic health record data. METHODS AND FINDINGS This was a retrospective cohort study utilising linked data from 1,256 general practices across England held within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2018. Included patients were aged 40+ years, with a systolic blood pressure reading between 130 and 179 mm Hg, and not previously prescribed antihypertensive treatment. The main exposure was defined as a first prescription of antihypertensive treatment. The primary outcome was hospitalisation or death within 10 years from falls. Secondary outcomes were hypotension, syncope, fractures, acute kidney injury, electrolyte abnormalities, and primary care attendance with gout. The association between treatment and these serious adverse events was examined by Cox regression adjusted for propensity score. This propensity score was generated from a multivariable logistic regression model with patient characteristics, medical history and medication prescriptions as covariates, and new antihypertensive treatment as the outcome. Subgroup analyses were undertaken by age and frailty. Of 3,834,056 patients followed for a median of 7.1 years, 484,187 (12.6%) were prescribed new antihypertensive treatment in the 12 months before the index date (baseline). Antihypertensives were associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation or death from falls (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 1.26), hypotension (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.35), syncope (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.22), acute kidney injury (aHR 1.44, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.47), electrolyte abnormalities (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.48), and primary care attendance with gout (aHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.37). The absolute risk of serious adverse events with treatment was very low, with 6 fall events per 10,000 patients treated per year. In older patients (80 to 89 years) and those with severe frailty, this absolute risk was increased, with 61 and 84 fall events per 10,000 patients treated per year (respectively). Findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses using different approaches to address confounding and taking into account the competing risk of death. A strength of this analysis is that it provides evidence regarding the association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events, in a population of patients more representative than those enrolled in previous randomised controlled trials. Although treatment effect estimates fell within the 95% CIs of those from such trials, these analyses were observational in nature and so bias from unmeasured confounding cannot be ruled out. CONCLUSIONS Antihypertensive treatment was associated with serious adverse events. Overall, the absolute risk of this harm was low, with the exception of older patients and those with moderate to severe frailty, where the risks were similar to the likelihood of benefit from treatment. In these populations, physicians may want to consider alternative approaches to management of blood pressure and refrain from prescribing new treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Sheppard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Constantinos Koshiaris
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Stevens
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Lay-Flurrie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brandon K Bellows
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - F D Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rupert A Payne
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
- Department of Health and Community Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - Subhashisa Swain
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Juliet A Usher-Smith
- The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Richard J McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Doherty AJ, Benedetto V, Harris C, Ridley J, O'Donoghue A, James-Jenkinson L, Fidler D, Clegg A. Preventing falls at home among people with intellectual disabilities: A scoping review. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2023. [PMID: 37076958 DOI: 10.1111/jar.13104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls are common among people with intellectual disabilities. Many falls happen within the home. Our scoping review aimed to identify evidence for falls-risk factors and falls-prevention interventions for this population. METHOD We conducted a multi-database search to identify any type of published study that explored falls-risk factors or falls-prevention interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. Following a process of (i) title & abstract and (ii) full-text screening, data was extracted from the included studies and described narratively. RESULTS Forty-one studies were included. Risks are multifactorial. There was limited evidence of medical, behavioural/psychological, or environmental interventions to address modifiable risk factors, and no evidence of the interventions' cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS Clinically and cost effective, acceptable and accessible falls-prevention pathways should be available for people with intellectual disabilities who are at risk of falls from an earlier age than the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison J Doherty
- Institute for Global Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), based at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Valerio Benedetto
- Institute for Global Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), based at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Catherine Harris
- Institute for Global Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), based at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Julie Ridley
- Institute for Global Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Centre for Citizenship and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | | | | | - Dave Fidler
- Pathways Associates (Community Interest Company), Accrington, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Institute for Global Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), based at the University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Benedetto V, Filipe L, Harris C, Tahir N, Doherty A, Clegg A. Outcome measures for economic evaluations and cost-effectiveness analyses of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities: A methodological systematic review. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 2023; 36:230-240. [PMID: 36448370 PMCID: PMC10099878 DOI: 10.1111/jar.13056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mainstream economic evaluations methods may not be appropriate to capture the range of effects triggered by interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify, assess and synthesise the arguments in the literature on how the effects of interventions for people with intellectual disabilities could be measured in economic evaluations. METHOD We searched for studies providing relevant arguments by running multi-database, backward, forward citation and grey literature searches. Following title/abstract and full-text screening, the arguments extracted from the included studies were summarised and qualitatively assessed in a narrative synthesis. RESULTS Our final analysis included three studies, with their arguments summarised in different methodological areas. CONCLUSIONS Based on the evidence, we suggest the use of techniques more attuned to the population with intellectual disabilities, such sensitive preference-based instruments to collect health states data, and mapping algorithms to obtain utility values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Benedetto
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Luís Filipe
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK.,Department of Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Catherine Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Naheed Tahir
- Public Advisers' Forum, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Alison Doherty
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Maharani A, Sinclair DR, Chandola T, Bower P, Clegg A, Hanratty B, Nazroo J, Pendleton N, Tampubolon G, Todd C, Wittenberg R, O'Neill TW, Matthews FE. Household wealth, neighbourhood deprivation and frailty amongst middle-aged and older adults in England: a longitudinal analysis over 15 years (2002-2017). Age Ageing 2023; 52:7093109. [PMID: 36995138 PMCID: PMC10061942 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND frailty is a condition of reduced function and health due to ageing processes and is associated with a higher risk of falls, hospitalisation, disability and mortality. OBJECTIVE to determine the relationship between household wealth and neighbourhood deprivation with frailty status, independently of demographic factors, educational attainment and health behaviours. DESIGN population-based cohort study. SETTING communities in England. SUBJECTS in total 17,438 adults aged 50+ from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. METHODS multilevel mixed-effects ordered logistic regression was used in this study. Frailty was measured using a frailty index. We defined small geographic areas (neighbourhoods) using English Lower layer Super Output Areas. Neighbourhood deprivation was measured by the English Index of Multiple Deprivation, grouped into quintiles. Health behaviours included in this study are smoking and frequency of alcohol consumption. RESULTS the proportion of respondents who were prefrail and frail were 33.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 33.0-34.6%] and 11.7 (11.1-12.2)%, respectively. Participants in the lowest wealth quintile and living in the most deprived neighbourhood quintile had 1.3 (95% CI = 1.2-1.3) and 2.2 (95% CI = 2.1-2.4) times higher odds of being prefrail and frail, respectively, than the wealthiest participants living in the least deprived neighbourhoods Living in more deprived neighbourhood and poorer wealth was associated with an increased risk of becoming frail. Those inequalities did not change over time. CONCLUSIONS in this population-based sample, living in a deprived area or having low wealth was associated with frailty in middle-aged and older adults. This relationship was independent of the effects of individual demographic characteristics and health behaviours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asri Maharani
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - David R Sinclair
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5PL, UK
| | - Tarani Chandola
- Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong 999077, Hong Kong
| | - Peter Bower
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5PL, UK
| | - James Nazroo
- Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Neil Pendleton
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Gindo Tampubolon
- Global Development Institute, School of Environment, Education and Development, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Chris Todd
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Raphael Wittenberg
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, Care Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2A 2AE, UK
| | - Terence W O'Neill
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Fiona E Matthews
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE4 5PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kaskirbayeva D, West R, Jaafari H, King N, Howdon D, Shuweihdi F, Clegg A, Nikolova S. Progression of frailty as measured by a cumulative deficit index: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev 2023; 84:101789. [PMID: 36396032 DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty is a risk factor for adverse health outcomes. There is a paucity of literature on frailty progression defined by a cumulative deficit model among community dwelling older people. The objective of this review was to synthesise evidence on these changes in health and mortality among community-dwelling older people. METHODS Six databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycInfo, Web of Science) and a clinical trials registry were searched in July 2021. The inclusion criteria were studies using a frailty index and providing information on transition between frailty states or to death in community-dwelling older people aged ≥ 50. Exclusion criteria were studies examining specific health conditions, conference abstracts and non-English studies. To standardise the follow-up period and facilitate comparison, we converted the transition probabilities to annual transition rates. RESULTS Two reviewers independently screened 5078 studies and 61 studies were included for analysis. Of these, only three used the same frailty state cut-points to facilitate cross-cohort comparison. This review found that frailty tends to increase with time, people who are frail at baseline have greater likelihood to progress in frailty and die, and the main factor that accelerates frailty progression is age. Other risk factors for progression are having chronic disease, smoking, obesity, low-income or/and low-education levels. A frailty index is an accurate predictor of adverse outcomes and death. DISCUSSION This systematic review demonstrated that worsening in frailty was a common frailty transition, and older people who are frail at baseline are more likely to die. A frailty index has significant power to predict adverse health outcomes. It is a useful tool for within-cohort comparison but there are challenges comparing different cohorts due to dependence of frailty progression on age and differences in how frailty index is defined and measured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hussain Jaafari
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Natalie King
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel Howdon
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Farag Shuweihdi
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Benedetto V, Filipe L, Harris C, Spencer J, Hickson C, Clegg A. Analytical Frameworks and Outcome Measures in Economic Evaluations of Digital Health Interventions: A Methodological Systematic Review. Med Decis Making 2023; 43:125-138. [PMID: 36259354 PMCID: PMC9742632 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x221132741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) can improve the provision of health care services. To fully account for their effects in economic evaluations, traditional methods based on measuring health-related quality of life may not be appropriate, as nonhealth and process outcomes are likely to be relevant too. PURPOSE This systematic review identifies, assesses, and synthesizes the arguments on the analytical frameworks and outcome measures used in the economic evaluations of DHIs. The results informed recommendations for future economic evaluations. DATA SOURCES We ran searches on multiple databases, complemented by gray literature and backward and forward citation searches. STUDY SELECTION We included records containing theoretical and empirical arguments associated with the use of analytical frameworks and outcome measures for economic evaluations of DHIs. Following title/abstract and full-text screening, our final analysis included 15 studies. DATA EXTRACTION The arguments we extracted related to analytical frameworks (14 studies), generic outcome measures (5 studies), techniques used to elicit utility values (3 studies), and disease-specific outcome measures and instruments to collect health states data (both from 2 studies). DATA SYNTHESIS Rather than assessing the quality of the studies, we critically assessed and synthesized the extracted arguments. Building on this synthesis, we developed a 3-stage set of recommendations in which we encourage the use of impact matrices and analyses of equity impacts to integrate traditional economic evaluation methods. LIMITATIONS Our review and recommendations explored but not fully covered other potentially important aspects of economic evaluations that were outside our scope. CONCLUSIONS This is the first systematic review that summarizes the arguments on how the effects of DHIs could be measured in economic evaluations. Our recommendations will help design future economic evaluations. HIGHLIGHTS Using traditional outcome measures based on health-related quality of life (such as the quality-adjusted life-year) may not be appropriate in economic evaluations of digital health interventions, which are likely to trigger nonhealth and process outcomes.This is the first systematic review to investigate how the effects of digital health interventions could be measured in economic evaluations.We extracted and synthesized different arguments from the literature, outlining advantages and disadvantages associated with different methods used to measure the effects of digital health interventions.We propose a methodological set of recommendations in which 1) we suggest that researchers consider the use of impact matrices and cost-consequence analysis, 2) we discuss the suitability of analytical frameworks and outcome measures available in economic evaluations, and 3) we highlight the need for analyses of equity impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Benedetto
- Valerio Benedetto, Applied health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire (UCLan), Brook Building, Preston, Lancashire PR1 2HE, UK; ()
| | - Luís Filipe
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK,Department of Health Research, Faculty of Health & Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK
| | - Catherine Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| | - Joseph Spencer
- Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK,Research Facilitation and Delivery Unit (RFDU), Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK
| | - Carmel Hickson
- Public Advisers’ Forum, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Unit, Applied Health Research hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK,Methodological Innovation, Development, Adaptation and Support (MIDAS) Theme, National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (NIHR ARC NWC), Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ceballos-Rasgado M, Lowe NM, Mallard S, Clegg A, Moran VH, Harris C, Montez J, Xipsiti M. Adverse Effects of Excessive Zinc Intake in Infants and Children Aged 0-3 Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr 2022; 13:2488-2518. [PMID: 36055780 PMCID: PMC9776731 DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmac088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Zinc supplementation reduces morbidity, but evidence suggests that excessive intakes can have negative health consequences. Current guidelines of upper limits (ULs) of zinc intake for young children are extrapolated from adult data. This systematic review (PROSPERO; registration no. CRD42020215187) aimed to determine the levels of zinc intake at which adverse effects are observed in young children. Studies reporting potential adverse effects of zinc intake in children aged 0-3 y were identified (from inception to August 2020) in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, with no limits on study design. Adverse clinical and physical effects of zinc intake were synthesized narratively, and meta-analyses of biochemical outcomes were conducted. Random effects models were used to generate forest plots to examine the evidence by age category, dose, dose duration, chemical formula of zinc, and zinc compared with placebo. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist, Cochrane Risk of Bias 2, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline were employed to assess risk of bias and to appraise the certainty of evidence. Fifty-eight studies assessed possible adverse effects of zinc doses ranging from 3 to 70 mg/d. Data from 39 studies contributed to meta-analyses. Zinc supplementation had an adverse effect on serum ferritin, plasma/serum copper concentration, serum transferrin receptor, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and the odds of anemia in ≥1 of the subgroups investigated. Lactulose:mannitol ratio was improved with zinc supplementation, and no significant effect was observed on C-reactive protein, erythrocyte superoxide dismutase, zinc protoporphyrin, blood cholesterol, and iron deficiency anemia. The certainty of the evidence, as assessed using GRADE, was very low to moderate. Although possible adverse effects of zinc supplementation were observed in some subgroups, it is unclear whether these findings are clinically important. The synthesized data can be used to undertake a dose-response analysis to update current guidelines of ULs of zinc intake for young children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marena Ceballos-Rasgado
- Centre for Global Development, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria H Moran
- Centre for Global Development, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom
| | - Jason Montez
- Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Xipsiti
- Food and Nutrition Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Taylor E, Frost J, Goodwin V, Ball S, Clegg A. OLDER ADULTS' PERSPECTIVES OF INDEPENDENCE THROUGH TIME: RESULTS OF A LONGITUDINAL INTERVIEW STUDY. Innov Aging 2022. [PMCID: PMC9770662 DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igac059.611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding how older people experience, and adapt to maintain, independence through time has implications for person-centred care. Quantifiable measures can provide a gauge of change in practice. However, little is known about how older people themselves perceive independence through time, or whether measures used are commensurate with what matters to older people. This study aimed to identify whether and how older adults assimilate their perceptions of independence in response to change through time. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted longitudinally, one year apart, to explore the views of 12 community-dwelling older adults, aged 76-85 years. A constructionist approach using dramaturgical and descriptive codes, facilitated the data interpretation. Sixteen analytical questions guided exploration of participants’ perceptions of independence through time. Interview participants felt that common interpretations of independence underestimated, and omitted, important aspects of their experience through time. Some participants questioned the value of instruments that were insensitive to individual values and context. Changes in life trajectories required participants to adapt the form, or means of obtaining independence. The impact of change on participants’ sense of independence was value-dependent, informed by the function a participant ascribed to maintaining independence. This study builds on the understanding of independence as a complex and multifaceted construct. The findings challenge the congruence of common interpretations of independence with older people’s views, showing areas of commonality and discrepancy. Exploration of independence in terms of form and function provides important understanding about how continuity of function takes precedence to form in determining the maintenance of independence through time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Taylor
- University of Exeter, Truro, England, United Kingdom
| | - Julia Frost
- University of Exeter, Exeter, England, United Kingdom
| | | | - Susan Ball
- University of Exeter, Exeter, England, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Clegg
- University of Leeds, Leeds, England, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ceballos-Rasgado M, Lowe NM, Moran VH, Clegg A, Mallard S, Harris C, Montez J, Xipsiti M. Toward revising dietary zinc recommendations for children aged 0 to 3 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of zinc absorption, excretion, and requirements for growth. Nutr Rev 2022:6881443. [PMID: 36478064 DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the World Health Organization are updating their dietary zinc recommendations for children aged 0 to 3 years. OBJECTIVE The aim of this review was to retrieve and synthesize evidence regarding zinc needs for growth as well as zinc losses, absorption, and bioavailability from the diet. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched electronically from inception to August 2020. Studies assessing the above factors in healthy children aged 0 to 9 years were included, with no limits on study design or language. DATA EXTRACTION Ninety-four studies reporting on zinc content in tissue (n = 27); zinc absorption (n = 47); factors affecting zinc bioavailability (n = 30); and endogenous zinc losses via urine, feces, or integument (n = 40) met the inclusion criteria. Four reviewers extracted data and two reviewers checked for accuracy. DATA ANALYSES Studies were synthesized narratively, and meta-analyses of zinc losses and gains as well the subgroups of age, type of feeding, country's income, and molar ratio of phytate to zinc were conducted. Meta-analysis revealed an overall mean (95%CI) urinary and endogenous fecal zinc excretion of 17.48 µg/kg/d (11.80-23.15; I2 = 94%) and 0.07 mg/kg/d (0.06-0.08; I2 = 82%), respectively, with a mean fractional zinc absorption of 26.75% (23.69-29.81; I2 = 99%). Subgrouping by age revealed differences in mean values associated with the transition from milk-based diets to solid food during the first 3 years of life. CONCLUSION This review synthesizes data that may be used to formulate zinc requirements in young children. Results should be interpreted with caution because of considerable heterogeneity in the evidence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42020215236.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicola M Lowe
- Centre for Global Development, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria H Moran
- Centre for Global Development, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Simonette Mallard
- New Zealand College of Public Health Medicine, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Catherine Harris
- Synthesis, Economic Evaluation and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Jason Montez
- Nutrition and Food Safety Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maria Xipsiti
- Food and Nutrition Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Littlewood E, McMillan D, Chew Graham C, Bailey D, Gascoyne S, Sloane C, Burke L, Coventry P, Crosland S, Fairhurst C, Henry A, Hewitt C, Baird K, Ryde E, Shearsmith L, Traviss-Turner G, Woodhouse R, Webster J, Meader N, Churchill R, Eddy E, Heron P, Hicklin N, Shafran R, Almeida O, Clegg A, Gentry T, Hill A, Lovell K, Dexter-Smith S, Ekers D, Gilbody S. Can we mitigate the psychological impacts of social isolation using behavioural activation? Long-term results of the UK BASIL urgent public health COVID-19 pilot randomised controlled trial and living systematic review. Evid Based Ment Health 2022; 25:e49-e57. [PMID: 36223980 PMCID: PMC9811092 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behavioural and cognitive interventions remain credible approaches in addressing loneliness and depression. There was a need to rapidly generate and assimilate trial-based data during COVID-19. OBJECTIVES We undertook a parallel pilot RCT of behavioural activation (a brief behavioural intervention) for depression and loneliness (Behavioural Activation in Social Isolation, the BASIL-C19 trial ISRCTN94091479). We also assimilate these data in a living systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42021298788) of cognitive and/or behavioural interventions. METHODS Participants (≥65 years) with long-term conditions were computer randomised to behavioural activation (n=47) versus care as usual (n=49). Primary outcome was PHQ-9. Secondary outcomes included loneliness (De Jong Scale). Data from the BASIL-C19 trial were included in a metanalysis of depression and loneliness. FINDINGS The 12 months adjusted mean difference for PHQ-9 was -0.70 (95% CI -2.61 to 1.20) and for loneliness was -0.39 (95% CI -1.43 to 0.65).The BASIL-C19 living systematic review (12 trials) found short-term reductions in depression (standardised mean difference (SMD)=-0.31, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.11) and loneliness (SMD=-0.48, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.27). There were few long-term trials, but there was evidence of some benefit (loneliness SMD=-0.20, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.01; depression SMD=-0.20, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.07). DISCUSSION We delivered a pilot trial of a behavioural intervention targeting loneliness and depression; achieving long-term follow-up. Living meta-analysis provides strong evidence of short-term benefit for loneliness and depression for cognitive and/or behavioural approaches. A fully powered BASIL trial is underway. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Scalable behavioural and cognitive approaches should be considered as population-level strategies for depression and loneliness on the basis of a living systematic review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dean McMillan
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Centre for Health and Population Science, Hull York Medical School, Hull, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Peter Coventry
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- York Environmental Sustainability Institute, University of York, York, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eloise Ryde
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development Unit, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | | | | | | | - Judith Webster
- Research and Development Unit, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - Nick Meader
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rachel Churchill
- Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Group, University of York, York, UK
| | - Elizabeth Eddy
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Paul Heron
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Nisha Hicklin
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Roz Shafran
- PPP, University College London Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Paediatric Psychology Services, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Osvaldo Almeida
- UWA Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK
| | - Tom Gentry
- Health and Care Policy, Age UK, London, UK
| | - Andrew Hill
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Karina Lovell
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Dexter-Smith
- Research and Development Unit, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - David Ekers
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Research and Development Unit, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
- Centre for Health and Population Sciences, Hull York Medical School, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Archer L, Koshiaris C, Lay-Flurrie S, Snell KIE, Riley RD, Stevens R, Banerjee A, Usher-Smith JA, Clegg A, Payne RA, Hobbs FDR, McManus RJ, Sheppard JP. Development and external validation of a risk prediction model for falls in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2022; 379:e070918. [PMID: 36347531 PMCID: PMC9641577 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and externally validate the STRAtifying Treatments In the multi-morbid Frail elderlY (STRATIFY)-Falls clinical prediction model to identify the risk of hospital admission or death from a fall in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Primary care data from electronic health records contained within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). PARTICIPANTS Patients aged 40 years or older with at least one blood pressure measurement between 130 mm Hg and 179 mm Hg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE First serious fall, defined as hospital admission or death with a primary diagnosis of a fall within 10 years of the index date (12 months after cohort entry). Model development was conducted using a Fine-Gray approach in data from CPRD GOLD, accounting for the competing risk of death from other causes, with subsequent recalibration at one, five, and 10 years using pseudo values. External validation was conducted using data from CPRD Aurum, with performance assessed through calibration curves and the observed to expected ratio, C statistic, and D statistic, pooled across general practices, and clinical utility using decision curve analysis at thresholds around 10%. RESULTS Analysis included 1 772 600 patients (experiencing 62 691 serious falls) from CPRD GOLD used in model development, and 3 805 366 (experiencing 206 956 serious falls) from CPRD Aurum in the external validation. The final model consisted of 24 predictors, including age, sex, ethnicity, alcohol consumption, living in an area of high social deprivation, a history of falls, multiple sclerosis, and prescriptions of antihypertensives, antidepressants, hypnotics, and anxiolytics. Upon external validation, the recalibrated model showed good discrimination, with pooled C statistics of 0.833 (95% confidence interval 0.831 to 0.835) and 0.843 (0.841 to 0.844) at five and 10 years, respectively. Original model calibration was poor on visual inspection and although this was improved with recalibration, under-prediction of risk remained (observed to expected ratio at 10 years 1.839, 95% confidence interval 1.811 to 1.865). Nevertheless, decision curve analysis suggests potential clinical utility, with net benefit larger than other strategies. CONCLUSIONS This prediction model uses commonly recorded clinical characteristics and distinguishes well between patients at high and low risk of falls in the next 1-10 years. Although miscalibration was evident on external validation, the model still had potential clinical utility around risk thresholds of 10% and so could be useful in routine clinical practice to help identify those at high risk of falls who might benefit from closer monitoring or early intervention to prevent future falls. Further studies are needed to explore the appropriate thresholds that maximise the model's clinical utility and cost effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Archer
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Constantinos Koshiaris
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Sarah Lay-Flurrie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Kym I E Snell
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Richard D Riley
- Centre for Prognosis Research, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Richard Stevens
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Juliet A Usher-Smith
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Rupert A Payne
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - F D Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Richard J McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - James P Sheppard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Partridge JSL, Ryan J, Dhesi JK, Barker C, Bates L, Bell R, Bryden D, Carter S, Clegg A, Conroy S, Cowley A, Curtis A, Diedo B, Eardley W, Evley R, Hare S, Hopper A, Humphry N, Kanga K, Kilvington B, Lees NP, McDonald D, McGarrity L, McNally S, Meilak C, Mudford L, Nolan C, Pearce L, Price A, Proffitt A, Romano V, Rose S, Selwyn D, Shackles D, Syddall E, Taylor D, Tinsley S, Vardy E, Youde J. New guidelines for the perioperative care of people living with frailty undergoing elective and emergency surgery-a commentary. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6847803. [PMID: 36436009 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Frailty is common in the older population and is a predictor of adverse outcomes following emergency and elective surgery. Identification of frailty is key to enable targeted intervention throughout the perioperative pathway from contemplation of surgery to recovery. Despite evidence on how to identify and modify frailty, such interventions are not yet routine perioperative care. To address this implementation gap, a guideline was published in 2021 by the Centre for Perioperative Care and the British Geriatrics Society, working with patient representatives and all stakeholders involved in the perioperative care of patients with frailty undergoing surgery. The guideline covers all aspects of perioperative care relevant to adults living with frailty undergoing elective and emergency surgery. It is written for healthcare professionals, as well as for patients and their carers, managers and commissioners. Implementation of the guideline will require collaboration between all stakeholders, underpinned by an implementation strategy, workforce development with supporting education and training resources, and evaluation through national audit and research. The guideline is an important step in improving perioperative outcomes for people living with frailty and quality of healthcare services. This commentary provides a summary and discussion of the evidence informing the standards and recommendations in the published guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith S L Partridge
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London London, UK
| | - Jack Ryan
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jugdeep K Dhesi
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Newton C, Beaver K, Clegg A. Patient initiated follow-up in cancer patients: A systematic review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:954854. [PMID: 36313728 PMCID: PMC9606321 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.954854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) is increasingly being implemented for oncology patients, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, given the necessary reduction in face-to-face hospital outpatient appointments. We do not know if PIFU has a positive (or negative) impact on overall, or progression free, survival. Objectives To investigate the impact of PIFU on overall survival, progression free survival, patient satisfaction, psychological morbidity, specifically quality of life (QoL) and economic costs compared to hospital follow up (HFU), for any type of cancer. Methods We carried out a systematic review using five electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were eligible if they were controlled clinical trials comparing PIFU with another form of active follow-up. Effectiveness was assessed using the primary outcome of overall survival and secondary outcomes of progression free survival, patient satisfaction, psychological morbidity, QoL and cost effectiveness. Results Eight studies met the inclusion criteria and were included. Only one study included survival as a primary outcome and indicated no significant differences between hospital-based follow-up and PIFU, although not adequately powered to detect a difference in survival. For secondary outcomes, few differences were found between PIFU and other forms of active follow-up. One study reported significant differences in fear of cancer recurrence between PIFU and HFU although did not reach the limit of clinical significance; in the short term, fear decreased significantly more in hospital based follow-up. Conclusion We do not have evidence to support the impact of PIFU on survival or progression free survival. Fully powered randomized controlled trials are required to determine the full impact of PIFU in the longer term.
Collapse
|
40
|
Brundle C, Heaven A, Clegg A. Eligibility screening older research participants using remote cognitive assessment-experiences and reflections from a primary care randomised controlled trial. Trials 2022; 23:862. [PMID: 36209240 PMCID: PMC9547629 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06805-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic forced many research teams to adjust the way they conduct studies, including moving to remote delivery of some or all of their recruitment and data collection processes. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is widely used in research and is available in multiple formats for different groups and assessment settings. Here, we reflect on our experiences of administering the MoCA Blind/Telephone as part of the initial telephone eligibility check for participation in a randomised controlled trial with community-dwelling older people with frailty. Main body In response to COVID-19, a number of changes were made to the trial’s screening and recruitment procedures, to minimise the amount of time the researchers would spend in the participants’ homes when recruitment began in May 2021. One of the changes was for the researchers to conduct a cognitive assessment for eligibility during an initial telephone call, rather than during the subsequent home visit for consent and baseline data collection. We found that in comparison with conducting the assessment in-person, telephone administration caused uncertainty for the researchers about whether participants were struggling to answer questions due to cognition or hearing impairment. Some participants experienced practical difficulties when combining holding a telephone and completing one of the assessment items. It was hard for the researchers to judge the emotional impact that undertaking the assessment was having on the older people on the telephone, without visual warning signs of fatigue or mood. We discuss the potential impact of these issues on trial recruitment and participant engagement, and the feasibility of videoconferencing as an alternative method of conducting the MoCA. Conclusion The MoCA is a useful tool when cognitive impairment is part of screening and data collection and it is helpful to have the option to use the test remotely. However, as we have found, telephone testing is not always straightforward. Researchers should weigh up the pros and cons for each individual study, especially those involving older adults. If choosing remote methods, consider the practicality of using videoconferencing and think about the possible impact of telephone assessment on the relationship with the (potential) research participants. Trial registration Personalised care planning for older people with frailty ISRCTN16123291 28/08/2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Brundle
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.
| | - Anne Heaven
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK.,Academic Unit of Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Smith H, Grindey C, Hague I, Newbould L, Brown L, Clegg A, Thompson C, Lawton R. Reducing delayed transfer of care in older people: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to shorter hospital stays. Health Expect 2022; 25:2628-2644. [PMID: 36193616 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Growing numbers of older patients occupy hospital beds despite being 'medically fit' for discharge. These Delayed Transfers of Care amplify inefficiencies in care and can cause harm. Delayed transfer because of family or patient choice is common; yet, research on patient and family perspectives is scarce. To identify barriers to, and facilitators of, shorter hospital stays, we sought to understand older people's and caregivers' thoughts and feelings about the benefits and harms of being in hospital and the decisions made at discharge. METHODS A multimethod qualitative study was carried out. Content analysis was carried out of older people's experiences of health or care services submitted to the Care Opinion online website, followed by telephone and video interviews with older people and family members of older people experiencing a hospital stay in the previous 12 months. RESULTS Online accounts provide insight into how care was organized for older people in the hospital, including deficiencies in care organization, the discharge process and communication, as well as how care was experienced by older people and family members. Interview-generated themes included shared meanings of hospitalization and discharge experiences and the context of discharge decisions including failure in communication systems, unwarranted variation and lack of confidence in care and lack of preparation for ongoing care. CONCLUSION Poor quality and availability of information, and poor communication, inhibit effective transfer of care. Communication is fundamental to patient-centred care and even more important in discharge models characterized by limited assessments and quicker discharge. Interventions at the service level and targeted patient information about what to expect in discharge assessments and after discharge could help to address poor communication and support for improving discharge of older people from hospital. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The Frailty Oversight Group, a small group of older people providing oversight of the Community Aging Research 75+ study, provided feedback on the research topic and level of interest, the draft data collection tools and the feasibility of collecting data with older people during the COVID-19 pandemic. The group also reviewed preliminary findings and provided feedback on our interpretation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Smith
- Improvement Science Theme, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Chloe Grindey
- Improvement Science Theme, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Isabel Hague
- Improvement Science Theme, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Yorkshire and Humber, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Louise Newbould
- Social Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of York, York, UK
| | - Lesley Brown
- Academic Unit for Aging and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Aging and Stroke Research, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK
| | - Carl Thompson
- School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kime N, Wright A, Heaven A, Hawkins R, Smith J, Cundill B, Foy R, Lawton R, Farrin A, Hulme C, Clegg A. Implementing personalised care planning for older people with frailty: a process evaluation of the PROSPER feasibility trial. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:760. [PMID: 36114521 PMCID: PMC9479257 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03426-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Personalised Care Planning (PCP) is a collaborative approach used in the management of chronic conditions. Core components of PCP are shared decision making to achieve joint goal setting and action planning by the clinician and patient. We undertook a process evaluation within the PROSPER feasibility trial to understand how best to implement PCP for older people with frailty in the community. Methods The trial was set in two localities in England. We observed training sessions and intervention delivery at three time points during the 12-week intervention period. We interviewed delivery teams before, during and after the intervention period, as well as primary care staff. We interviewed older people who had received, declined or withdrawn from PCP. We explored training of staff delivering PCP, structures, mechanisms and resources needed for delivery, and influences on uptake. We undertook a framework approach to data analysis. Findings We observed thirteen training sessions and interviewed seven delivery staff, five primary care staff, and twenty older people, including seven who had declined or withdrawn from the intervention. Delivery teams successfully acquired skills and knowledge, but felt underprepared for working with people with lower levels of frailty. Timing of training was critical and ‘top-ups’ were needed. Engagement with primary care staff was tenuous. Older people with lower frailty were unclear of the intervention purpose and benefits, goal setting and action planning. Conclusions PCP has the potential to address the individualised needs of older people with frailty. However, training requires careful tailoring and is ideally on-going. Considerable efforts are required to integrate statutory and voluntary stakeholders, understanding the expectations and contributions of each agency from the outset. In addition, older people with frailty need time and support to adjust to new ways of thinking about their own health now and in the future so they can participate in shared decision making. These key factors will be essential when developing models of care for delivering PCP to support older people with frailty to sustain their independence and quality of life. Trial registration ISRCTN 12,363,970 – 08/11/2018. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03426-4.
Collapse
|
43
|
Boaden E, Burnell J, Hives L, Dey P, Clegg A, Lyons MW, Lightbody CE, Hurley MA, Roddam H, McInnes E, Alexandrov AW, Watkins CL. Screening for Aspiration Risk Associated With Dysphagia in Acute Stroke. Stroke 2022. [PMID: 35994682 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.122.037998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Boaden
- Faculty of Health and Care (E.B., J.B., L.H., A.C., C.E.L., M.A.H., C.L.W.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Jane Burnell
- Faculty of Health and Care (E.B., J.B., L.H., A.C., C.E.L., M.A.H., C.L.W.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Hives
- Faculty of Health and Care (E.B., J.B., L.H., A.C., C.E.L., M.A.H., C.L.W.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Paola Dey
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom (P.D.)
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Faculty of Health and Care (E.B., J.B., L.H., A.C., C.E.L., M.A.H., C.L.W.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Mary W Lyons
- Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom (M.W.L.)
| | - C Elizabeth Lightbody
- Faculty of Health and Care (E.B., J.B., L.H., A.C., C.E.L., M.A.H., C.L.W.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.,Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (C.E.L.)
| | - Margaret A Hurley
- Faculty of Health and Care (E.B., J.B., L.H., A.C., C.E.L., M.A.H., C.L.W.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Hazel Roddam
- Faculty of Allied Health and Well-being (H.R.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth McInnes
- Nursing Research Institute, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia (E.M.)
| | - Anne W Alexandrov
- Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), Memphis (A.W.A.)
| | - Caroline L Watkins
- Faculty of Health and Care (E.B., J.B., L.H., A.C., C.E.L., M.A.H., C.L.W.), University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hill JE, Mansoor M, Hamer O, Gomez KU, Clegg A. Predictors Of Post-Operative Negative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Br J Card Nurs 2022; 17:0061. [PMID: 37915312 PMCID: PMC7615269 DOI: 10.12968/bjca.2022.0061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
With the advent of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI), populations who were previously not fit enough for heart valve surgery are now able to have a valve replacement without placing these higher risk individuals through major surgery. Complication rates following TAVI have reduced over the last few years, but recent studies suggest that the incidence of several complications remains high. Avoiding complications is key to reducing costs associated with TAVI, which is important given that the procedure is already more expensive than other treatment options. An emerging strategy for patients undergoing TAVI is to identify pre-operative factors predictive of post-operative adverse outcomes. This commentary summarises three systematic reviews exploring moderating factors for adverse events after TAVI surgery, with the aim of identifying statistically and clinically significant factors associated with poor surgical outcomes and contextualise these factors within clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohamed Mansoor
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shi C, Goodall M, Dumville J, Hill J, Norman G, Hamer O, Clegg A, Watkins CL, Georgiou G, Hodkinson A, Lightbody CE, Dark P, Cullum N. The accuracy of pulse oximetry in measuring oxygen saturation by levels of skin pigmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2022; 20:267. [PMID: 35971142 PMCID: PMC9377806 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02452-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been concerns regarding potential bias in pulse oximetry measurements for people with high levels of skin pigmentation. We systematically reviewed the effects of skin pigmentation on the accuracy of oxygen saturation measurement by pulse oximetry (SpO2) compared with the gold standard SaO2 measured by CO-oximetry. METHODS We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (up to December 2021) for studies with SpO2-SaO2 comparisons and measuring the impact of skin pigmentation or ethnicity on pulse oximetry accuracy. We performed meta-analyses for mean bias (the primary outcome in this review) and its standard deviations (SDs) across studies included for each subgroup of skin pigmentation and ethnicity and used these pooled mean biases and SDs to calculate accuracy root-mean-square (Arms) and 95% limits of agreement. The review was registered with the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/gm7ty ). RESULTS We included 32 studies (6505 participants): 15 measured skin pigmentation and 22 referred to ethnicity. Compared with standard SaO2 measurement, pulse oximetry probably overestimates oxygen saturation in people with the high level of skin pigmentation (pooled mean bias 1.11%; 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 1.93%) and people described as Black/African American (1.52%; 0.95 to 2.09%) (moderate- and low-certainty evidence). The bias of pulse oximetry measurements for people with other levels of skin pigmentation or those from other ethnic groups is either more uncertain or suggests no overestimation. Whilst the extent of mean bias is small or negligible for all subgroups evaluated, the associated imprecision is unacceptably large (pooled SDs > 1%). When the extent of measurement bias and precision is considered jointly, pulse oximetry measurements for all the subgroups appear acceptably accurate (with Arms < 4%). CONCLUSIONS Pulse oximetry may overestimate oxygen saturation in people with high levels of skin pigmentation and people whose ethnicity is reported as Black/African American, compared with SaO2. The extent of overestimation may be small in hospital settings but unknown in community settings. REVIEW PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: https://osf.io/gm7ty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhu Shi
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK.
| | - Mark Goodall
- Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC-NWC), Manchester, UK
| | - Jo Dumville
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
| | - James Hill
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC-NWC), Manchester, UK
- Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Gill Norman
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
| | - Oliver Hamer
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC-NWC), Manchester, UK
- Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC-NWC), Manchester, UK
- Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Caroline Leigh Watkins
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC-NWC), Manchester, UK
- Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - George Georgiou
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC-NWC), Manchester, UK
- Applied Health Research Hub, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | - Alexander Hodkinson
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | | | - Paul Dark
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
- Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford Care Organisation, Salford, M6 8HD, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Nicky Cullum
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester (ARC-GM), Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Wilkinson C, Wu J, Clegg A, Nadarajah R, Rockwood K, Todd O, Gale CP. Impact of oral anticoagulation on the association between frailty and clinical outcomes in people with atrial fibrillation: nationwide primary care records on treatment analysis. Europace 2022; 24:1065-1075. [PMID: 35244709 PMCID: PMC9326851 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS People with atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently live with frailty, which increases the risk of mortality and stroke. This study reports the association between oral anticoagulation (OAC) and outcomes for people with frailty, and whether there is overall net benefit from treatment in people with AF. METHODS AND RESULTS Retrospective open cohort electronic records study. Frailty was identified using the electronic frailty index. Primary care electronic health records of 89 996 adults with AF and CHA2DS2-Vasc score of ≥2 were linked with secondary care and mortality data in the Clinical Practice Research Database (CPRD) from 1 January 1998 to 30 November 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of death, stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding. Secondary outcomes were stroke, major bleeding, all-cause mortality, transient ischaemic attack, and falls. Of 89 996 participants, 71 256 (79.2%) were living with frailty. The prescription of OAC increased with degree of frailty. For patients not prescribed OAC, rates of the primary outcome increased alongside frailty category. Prescription of OAC was associated with a reduction in the primary outcome for each frailty category [adjusted hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval, no OAC as reference; fit: vitamin K antagonist (VKA) 0.69, 0.64-0.75, direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) 0.42, 0.33-0.53; mild frailty: VKA 0.52, 0.50-0.54, DOAC 0.57, 0.52-0.63; moderate: VKA 0.54, 0.52-0.56, DOAC 0.57, 0.52-0.63; severe: VKA 0.48, 0.45-0.51, DOAC 0.58, 0.52-0.65], with cumulative incidence function effects greater for DOAC than VKA. CONCLUSION Frailty among people with AF is common. The OAC was associated with a reduction in the primary endpoint across all degrees of frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Wilkinson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jianhua Wu
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, 6.090a Worsley Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, 6.090a Worsley Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 6.090a Worsley Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Ramesh Nadarajah
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, 6.090a Worsley Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, 6.090a Worsley Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Kenneth Rockwood
- Geriatric Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Oliver Todd
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, 6.090a Worsley Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - Chris P Gale
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, 6.090a Worsley Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, University of Leeds, 6.090a Worsley Building, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Rennie KJ, Witham M, Bradley P, Clegg A, Connolly S, Hancock HC, Hiu S, Marsay L, McDonald C, Robertson L, Simms L, Steel AJ, Steves CJ, Storey B, Wason J, Wilson N, von Zglinicki T, Sayer AAP. MET-PREVENT: metformin to improve physical performance in older people with sarcopenia and physical prefrailty/frailty - protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled proof-of-concept trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061823. [PMID: 35851031 PMCID: PMC9297211 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Skeletal muscle dysfunction is central to both sarcopenia and physical frailty, which are associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes including falls and fractures, longer hospital stays, dependency and the need for care. Resistance training may prevent and treat sarcopenia and physical frailty, but not everyone can or wants to exercise. Finding alternatives is critical to alleviate the burden of adverse outcomes associated with sarcopenia and physical frailty. This trial will provide proof-of-concept evidence as to whether metformin can improve physical performance in older people with sarcopenia and physical prefrailty or frailty. METHODS AND ANALYSIS MET-PREVENT is a parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled proof-of-concept trial. Trial participants can participate from their own homes, including completing informed consent and screening assessments. Eligible participants with low grip strength or prolonged sit-to-stand time together with slow walk speed will be randomised to either oral metformin hydrochloride 500 mg tablets or matched placebo, taken three times a day for 4 months. The recruitment target is 80 participants from two secondary care hospitals in Newcastle and Gateshead, UK. Local primary care practices will act as participant identification centres. Randomisation will be performed using a web-based minimisation system with a random element, balancing on sex and baseline walk speed. Participants will be followed up for 4 months post-randomisation, with outcomes collected at baseline and 4 months. The primary outcome measure is the four metre walk speed at the 4-month follow-up visit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has been approved by the Liverpool NHS Research Ethics Committee (20/NW/0470), the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority (EudraCT 2020-004023-16) and the UK Health Research Authority (IRAS 275219). Results will be made available to participants, their families, patients with sarcopenia, the public, regional and national clinical teams, and the international scientific community. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN29932357.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine J Rennie
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Miles Witham
- NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University and Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Penny Bradley
- Pharmacy Directorate, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care & Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Stephen Connolly
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Helen C Hancock
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Shaun Hiu
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Leanne Marsay
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Laura Robertson
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Laura Simms
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Alison J Steel
- Newcastle Clinical Trials Unit, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Bryony Storey
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK
| | - James Wason
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Nina Wilson
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Avan A P Sayer
- NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle University and Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Jones D, Di Martino E, Bradley SH, Essang B, Hemphill S, Wright JM, Renzi C, Surr C, Clegg A, Neal R. Factors influencing symptom appraisal and help-seeking of older adults with possible cancer: a mixed-methods systematic review. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 72:BJGP.2021.0655. [PMID: 35995576 PMCID: PMC9423047 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2021.0655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cancer burden falls predominantly on older (≥65 years) adults. Prompt presentation to primary care with cancer symptoms could result in earlier diagnosis. However, patient symptom appraisal and help-seeking decisions involving cancer symptoms are complex and may be further complicated in older adults. AIM To explore the effect of older age on patients' appraisal of possible cancer symptoms and their decision to seek help for these symptoms. DESIGN AND SETTING Mixed-methods systematic review. METHOD MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, ASSIA, the ISRCTN registry, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence were searched for studies on symptom appraisal and help-seeking decisions for cancer symptoms by adults aged ≥65 years. Studies were analysed using thematic synthesis and according to the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis guidelines. RESULTS Eighty studies were included with a total of 32 995 participants. Studies suggested a possible association between increasing age and prolonged symptom appraisal interval. Reduced knowledge of cancer symptoms and differences in symptom interpretation may contribute to this prolonged interval. In contrast, in the current study a possible association was found between increasing age and prompt help-seeking. Themes affecting help-seeking in older adults included the influence of family and carers, competing priorities, fear, embarrassment, fatalism, comorbidities, a desire to avoid doctors, a perceived need to not waste doctors' time, and patient self-management of symptoms. CONCLUSION This review suggests that increasing age is associated with delayed cancer symptom appraisal. When symptoms are recognised as potentially serious, increasing age was associated with prompt help-seeking although other factors could prolong this. Policymakers, charities, and GPs should aim to ensure older adults are able to recognise potential symptoms of cancer and seek help promptly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Jones
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | | | | | - Blessing Essang
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | - Scott Hemphill
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | - Judy M Wright
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | | | | | - Andrew Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing & Stroke Research, University of Leeds, Leeds
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Avgerinou C, Petersen I, Clegg A, West RM, Osborn D, Walters K. 1071 INCIDENCE OF RECORDED OSTEOPOROSIS, OSTEOPENIA AND FRAGILITY FRACTURE IN OLDER PEOPLE: ANALYSIS OF UK PRIMARY CARE DATA. Age Ageing 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac124.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Osteoporosis is common in later life, leading to fragility fractures associated with increased mortality, disability, and costs. There is a surprising lack of data regarding the incidence of osteoporosis. We aimed to estimate the incidence of recorded diagnosis of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fragility fracture in older people, explore time trends in diagnosis, and differences by age, sex, and social deprivation.
Method
We used de-identified patient data provided as part of routine primary care (IQVIA Medical Research Database (IMRD). All patients aged 50-99y registered with THIN (The Health Improvement Network) participating practices between 1/1/2000–31/12/2018 were included. Crude incidence rates (IR) were estimated per 10,000 person-years (PY). We used Poisson regression to calculate adjusted Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) accounting for sex, age, calendar year and deprivation.
Results
The IR of osteoporosis was significantly higher in women, 84.32 (95%CI 83.81–84.83) vs. 16.66 (95%CI 16.43–16.90) in men per 10,000PY. In women, recorded IR of osteoporosis reached a peak in 2009. In the adjusted model, older men in most deprived areas had a higher IRR of osteoporosis [1.67 (95% 1.59–1.74)] compared to those in least deprived areas. Women were more likely to be diagnosed with osteopenia compared to men, at any age. Incidence of osteopenia diagnosis increased over time. In the adjusted model, men in most deprived areas had a higher IRR of osteopenia [1.44 (95%CI 1.35–1.53)] compared to least deprived areas. The IR of fragility fracture was higher in women, 84.97 (95%CI 84.45–85.48) vs. 31.15 (95%CI 30.83–31.48) in men per 10,000PY. In the adjusted model, men in most deprived areas had an increased IRR of fragility fracture [1.53 (95%CI 1.48–1.59)] compared to least deprived areas.
Conclusion
Community bone health interventions might be targeted at populations at higher risk of fragility fractures, including older men living in socially deprived areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Avgerinou
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London , UK
| | - I Petersen
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London , UK
| | - A Clegg
- Academic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, University of Leeds , UK
| | - R M West
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds , UK
| | - D Osborn
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London , UK
| | - K Walters
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Frost R, Avgerinou C, Goodman C, Clegg A, Hopkins J, Gould RL, Gardner B, Marston L, Hunter R, Manthorpe J, Cooper C, Skelton DA, Drennan VM, Logan P, Walters K. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a personalised health promotion intervention enabling independence in older people with mild frailty (‘HomeHealth’) compared to treatment as usual: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:485. [PMID: 35659196 PMCID: PMC9166243 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03160-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Frailty is clinically associated with multiple adverse outcomes, including reduced quality of life and functioning, falls, hospitalisations, moves to long-term care and mortality. Health services commonly focus on the frailest, with highest levels of need. However, evidence suggests that frailty is likely to be more reversible in people who are less frail. Evidence is emerging on what interventions may help prevent or reduce frailty, such as resistance exercises and multi-component interventions, but few interventions are based on behaviour change theory. There is little evidence of cost-effectiveness.
Previously, we co-designed a new behaviour change health promotion intervention (“HomeHealth”) to support people with mild frailty. HomeHealth is delivered by trained voluntary sector support workers over six months who support older people to work on self-identified goals to maintain their independence, such as strength and balance exercises, nutrition, mood and enhancing social engagement. The service was well received in our feasibility randomised controlled trial and showed promising effects upon outcomes.
Aim
To test the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the HomeHealth intervention on maintaining independence in older people with mild frailty in comparison to treatment as usual (TAU).
Methods
Single-blind individually randomised controlled trial comparing the HomeHealth intervention to TAU. We will recruit 386 participants from general practices and the community across three English regions. Participants are included if they are community-dwelling, aged 65 + , with mild frailty according to the Clinical Frailty Scale. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive HomeHealth or TAU for 6 months. The primary outcome is independence in activities of daily living (modified Barthel Index) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include instrumental activities of daily living, quality of life, frailty, wellbeing, psychological distress, loneliness, cognition, capability, falls, carer burden, service use, costs and mortality. Outcomes will be analysed using linear mixed models, controlling for baseline Barthel score and site. A health economic analysis and embedded mixed-methods process evaluation will be conducted.
Discussion
This trial will provide definitive evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a home-based, individualised intervention to maintain independence in older people with mild frailty in comparison to TAU, that could be implemented at scale if effective.
Trial registration
ISRCTN, ISRCTN54268283. Registered 06/04/2020.
Collapse
|