Peritoneal papillary carcinoma

Narrative review on serous primary peritoneal carcinoma of unknown primary site: four questions to be answered

Serous peritoneal papillary carcinoma (SPPC) represents a particular cancer of unknown primary (CUP) entity that arises in the peritoneal surface lining the abdomen and pelvis without a discriminative primary tumor site. In this review, we discuss the validity of SPPC as a distinct entity. Clinically, patients with SPPC are older, have higher parity and later menarche, are more often obese and probably have poorer survival compared to those with primary ovarian cancer. Pathologically, SPPC is more anaplastic and multifocal, unlike primary ovarian cancer which is commonly unifocal. Biologically, it presents a higher expression of proliferative signals and similar cell cycle and DNA repair protein expression. These differences hint towards SPPC and primary ovarian cancer being as a spectrum of disease. Patients with SPPC are traditionally managed similarly to stage III–IV ovarian cancer. The recommended approach integrates aggressive cytoreductive surgery, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy to remove the macroscopic tumor, eradicate the microscopic residual disease, and control the microscopic metastasis. However, the available evidence lacks proper randomized or prospective studies on SPPC and is limited to retrospective series. The diligent identification of SPPC is warranted to design specific clinical trials that eventually evaluate the impact of the new therapeutics on this distinct entity.

Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma presenting as a large mesenteric mass mistaken for ovarian cancer: a case of primary peritoneal carcinoma

Peritoneal origin serous papillary carcinoma is an uncommon primary malignancy occurring in the abdominal or pelvic peritoneum lining. It is characterized by peritoneal carcinomatosis with massive ascites, uninvolved or minimally involved ovary, and is histologically indistinguishable from ovarian serous tumors. Better recognition of this phenomenon in recent years has contributed to an increasing diagnostic frequency. We describe a rare case of peritoneal origin serous papillary carcinoma with unusual clinical presentations involving a solitary primary tumor originating from the peritoneal lining of the sigmoid colonal mesentery, without pelvic lymph node involvement or distant metastasis. Because of the location and morphological similarity, it was misdiagnosed as an ovarian malignancy. We aim to assist in the diagnosis of this disease with the following case report, thereby improving the management of patients with this condition.

Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal of the gynecologic malignancies, largely due to the advanced stage at diagnosis in most patients. Screening strategies using ultrasound and the cancer antigen (CA) 125 tumor marker are currently under study and may lower stage at diagnosis but have not yet been shown to improve survival. Women who have inherited a deleterious mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene and those with the Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) have the highest risk of developing ovarian cancer but account for only approximately 10% of those with the disease. Other less common and less well-defined genetic syndromes may increase the risk of ovarian cancer, but their contribution to genetic risk is small. A clear etiology for sporadic ovarian cancer has not been identified, but risk is affected by reproductive and hormonal factors. Surgery has a unique role in ovarian cancer, as it is used not only for diagnosis and staging but also therapeutically, even in patients with widely disseminated, advanced disease. Ovarian cancer is highly sensitive to chemotherapy drugs, particularly the platinum agents, and most patients will attain a remission with initial treatment. Recent advances in the delivery of chemotherapy using the intraperitoneal route have further improved survival after initial therapy. Although the majority of ovarian cancer patients will respond to initial chemotherapy, most will ultimately develop disease recurrence. Chemotherapy for recurrent disease includes platinum-based, multiagent regimens for women whose disease recurs more than 6 to 12 months after the completion of initial therapy and sequential single agents for those whose disease recurs earlier. New targeted biologic agents, particularly those involved with the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway and those targeting the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) enzyme, hold great promise for improving the outcome of ovarian cancer.

Serous papillary peritoneal carcinoma: unknown primary tumour, ovarian cancer counterpart or a distinct entity? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Serous peritoneal papillary carcinoma (SPPC), though managed according to ovarian cancer therapeutic principles, has been variably considered as an ovarian cancer counterpart, a peritoneal malignancy with distinct characteristics or a cancer of unknown primary (CUP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed all publications studying molecular pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management and outcome of at least 10 patients with SPPC from 1980 to 2008 in anglophone medical journals and critically analysed the data.

RESULTS

Molecular profiling of CUP was performed in eight papers reporting on 211 patients with stage III/IV SPPC by means of immunohistochemistry or PCR-based assays. Twenty-five clinical series, mostly retrospective, reported management and outcome of 579 patients with SPPC, in several cases matched to advanced ovarian cancer controls. Though we did not identify statistically significant differences in molecular biology, clinical presentation, management and outcome of SPPC and ovarian cancer cases, some subtle differences emerged: patterns of loss of heterozygosity at several chromosomal loci differed from those seen in ovarian cancer, while the overexpression of the HER2 oncogene was encountered more often. Serous peritoneal tumours affected older patients and were more frequently multifocal or exhibited virulent clonal expansion in metastatic sites. Diffuse micronodular spread formed a high total load of malignancy in omental, peritoneal surfaces, difficult to debulk optimally. Despite effective chemotherapeutic cytoreduction and occasional long-term remissions, SPPC patients survived 2-6 months less than ovarian cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SPPC should not be classified in the poor-risk CUP category, in view of the therapeutic and prognostic differences. Still, the assimilation of the SPPC entity by ovarian cancer hindered further research into its genotypic and phenotypic characteristics that may differ from ovarian cancer. Subgroup analyses of large ovarian cancer trials may shed light in this issue.

Pattern of retroperitoneal dissemination of primary peritoneum cancer: basis for rational use of lymphadenectomy

INTRODUCTION

The rationale for lymphadenectomy in primary peritoneal cancer (PPC) is unclear. We sought to define the pattern of lymphatic metastasis in PPC and propose evidence-based rationale for lymphadenectomy in relevant cases.

METHODS

Patients with PPC undergoing primary surgery at Mayo Clinic were identified. Demographics, tumor characteristics, procedures performed and follow up were analyzed.

RESULTS

Forty eight patients with PPC were identified; 39 had stage IIIC (81.2%) and 9 (18.8%) had stage IV. Residual disease (RD) after primary surgery was microscopic in 6 cases (12.5%), less than 1 cm in 33 (68.8%), more than 1 cm in 9 patient (18.7%) with median survivals of 5.8, 3.2 and 1.3 years, respectively. Overall, 24 patients had lymphadenectomy performed (pelvic (PND) or paraortic (PAND) or both). Pelvic nodes were involved in 12/23 (52.7%) cases, while para-aortic nodes were involved in 5/21 (23.8%) of cases. The rate of simultaneously positive pelvic and para-aortic nodes was 20% (4/20). Nodal involvement was a poor prognostic factor with 5 year overall survival 63% vs. 25% (p=0.014) in node positive vs. negative cases. Compared to patients with primary ovarian cancer (OC), OC cases had a higher rate of positive para-aortic nodes (57.6%: 77/132; p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal lymph nodes are a common site of metastases in PPC, therefore it is logically consistent to perform PND and PAND if a patient can be cytoreduced to microscopic RD in other sites or remove grossly positive nodes in patients with RD<1 cm.

Treatment for patients with unknown primary cancer and favorable prognostic factors

Patients with carcinoma of unknown primary site are heterogeneous with respect to clinical and pathologic features. Within this diverse group, specific clinical and/or pathologic features can be used to define several subsets with favorable prognoses. Specific subsets include women with peritoneal carcinomatosis, women with isolated axillary lymph node metastases, adenocarcinoma presenting as a single metastatic lesion, young men with features of extragonadal germ cell tumor, squamous carcinoma involving cervical or inguinal lymph nodes, and neuroendocrine carcinoma. Prospective identification of patients in these favorable subgroups allows the most effective treatment to be selected. This review summarizes current recommendations for the evaluation and treatment of patients in each of these favorable prognostic subsets.

Potentially important microRNA cluster on chromosome 17p13.1 in primary peritoneal carcinoma

MicroRNAs are a group of small non-coding RNAs approximately 22 nucleotides in length. Recent work has shown differential expression of mature microRNAs in human cancers. We characterized the alteration in expression of a select group of microRNAs in primary peritoneal carcinoma relative to matched cases of ovarian serous carcinoma. MicroRNA expression was analysed using semi-quantitative stem-loop RT-PCR on a set of 34 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Protein expression of p53 and bcl-2 was quantified in the corresponding tissue microarray. We provide definitive evidence that there is downregulation of a select group of microRNAs in tumours meeting Gynaecological Oncology Group criteria for primary peritoneal carcinoma relative to ovarian serous carcinoma. Specifically, we show decreased p53 expression and downregulation of miR-195 and miR-497 from the microRNA cluster site at chromosome 17p13.1 in primary peritoneal carcinoma relative to ovarian serous carcinoma. miR-195 and miR-497 may have potential roles as tumour-suppressor genes in primary peritoneal tumourigenesis.

Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: clinical and laboratory characteristics

BACKGROUND

Primary peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma (PPPSC) is an uncommon primary malignancy of the peritoneum. The aim of our study is to present the characteristics of such a rare entity through our case series.

METHOD

This is a retrospective study of nine cases of PPPSC who were treated between January 2002 and April 2007 in METAXA Memorial Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece. Medical files and histopathological diagnosis of each patient were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 63 years ranging from 44 up to 74 years. Clinically PPPSC presented with general abdominal discomfort in all of the patients. Three out of nine patients presented with constipation, 5/9 with distention, and 7/9 with ascites. All of the patients referred loss of appetite with weight gaining due to ascites. All the patients had pathological values of CA125 (over 35 U/ml) ranging from 125 up to 1,255 U/ml with median value 565 U/ml. Optimal debulking was possible in 3/9 of patients who were consequently treated with standard taxol-platin chemotherapy. Complete response was achieved in one woman. The median disease-free survival was 7 months and the median overall survival rate was 2.5 years.

CONCLUSION

PPPSC mimics ovarian papillary serous carcinoma regarding the clinical and laboratory characteristics but it has worse prognosis.

Platinum resistance and impaired survival in patients with advanced primary peritoneal carcinoma: matched-case comparison with patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare chemotherapy response and survival of patients with advanced primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) vs those with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC).

STUDY DESIGN

From 1998 to 2004, 43 PPC patients were identified and matched to 129 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC-IV EOC by criteria abstracted from medical records. Primary endpoints were chemotherapy response, platinum resistance, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

All patients received primary platinum-taxane chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in achieving a clinical complete response. PPC patients were more likely to be platinum resistant at 6 months and had significantly impaired PFS and OS. After multivariate analysis, PPC was independently associated with a worse prognosis for both survival endpoints.

CONCLUSION

PPC was associated with a similar initial response but a higher rate of platinum resistance and shorter PFS and OS. Consideration of these results may be useful for patient counseling, trial stratification, and molecular comparisons.

Clinical characteristics of primary peritoneal carcinoma

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to determine the clinical and therapeutic characteristics of women with a primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective clinical study was conducted to evaluate 22 women diagnosed with a PPC from 1993 to 2007 at the Hospitals of The Catholic University of Korea. Diagnoses were based on the Gynecologic Oncology Group criteria and clinical data. We collected patient clinicopathological data including age, presenting symptoms, pretreatment CA-125 values (U/ml), clinical stage (based on the FIGO stage), performance status (using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale), whether cytoreductive surgery was optimal or not, types of chemotherapy and response to treatment. We evaluated the clinical characteristics and response to treatment, time to treatment failure and overall survival.

RESULTS

The median overall survival of all patients was 23.1 months. The estimated 3-year survival rate was 29% (SE, 13%). The response rate to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy was 79% and the median time to treatment failure was 9.9 months (95% confidence interval, 1.38~18.4 months). By univariate and multivariate analysis, performance status was the only significant factor associated with overall survival (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

We evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment response of patients with a primary peritoneal carcinoma. Our results showed that it is possible to achieve long-term survival in patients with PPC. A further clinical study is to need to establish clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes.

Papillary serous carcinoma in ovaries of normal size: a clinicopathologic study of 20 cases and comparison with extraovarian peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinicopathological features of papillary serous carcinoma in ovaries of normal size and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC).

METHODS

Among 167 patients diagnosed with advanced primary serous ovarian carcinoma over a 9-year period, 20 patients with a normal ovarian size (not larger than 4 cm in the longest diameter) were selected for this study after a review of the pathologic materials. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were compared with those of seven patients with PPC, diagnosed using the GOG criteria during the same period.

RESULTS

All the patients with ovarian carcinoma and five of seven PPC patients had small ovarian tumors. There were few significantly different features between the two groups. The patients with ovarian carcinoma were younger than those with PPC (median age of 52 vs. 64 years, P=0.007) and tended to have a lower baseline CA125 level (median value of 937 vs. 2870 U/mL, P=0.097), less severe omental involvement (P=0.057), and a more complete response to adjuvant chemotherapy (89% vs. 57%, P=0.064).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the sample size was small, there was no meaningful difference between patients with papillary serous carcinoma in ovaries of normal size and PPC. Therefore, further studies will be needed to determine the relevance of the GOG rules in distinguishing between the two groups.

Primary peritoneal carcinoma--Uterine involvement and hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency of uterine involvement in primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) and to describe selected clinical characteristics in patients with and without hysterectomy.

METHODS

All incident cases of histologically confirmed cancer of the ovary or peritoneum, diagnosed in Israeli Jewish women between March 1 1994 and June 30, 1999, were identified within the framework of a nationwide epidemiological study of these neoplasms. The study population was accrued through an active search of all newly diagnosed patients in all the departments of gynecology in Israel. The data of 81 PPC patients included in the present study were abstracted from medical records.

RESULTS

Hysterectomy was performed in 48 patients. These patients had a lower mean age (62.4 +/- 9.4 vs. 66.9 +/- 10.4; P = 0.05) at diagnosis and a higher rate of < or =2 cm residual disease (54.2% vs.24.2%; P = 0.02). Of those with hysterectomy, microscopic involvement was verified in all those with macroscopic involvement. Overall microscopic involvement was present in 28 (58.3%) of the patients who underwent hysterectomy. In the majority of them, only the serosa was involved. Macroscopic uterine involvement was present in 27 (33.3%) patients but in only 12% it was >2 cm. The median survival in patients with hysterectomy was 36 months and in those without hysterectomy 29 months, this difference was statistically not significant (P = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that in an unselected group of PPC patients 33% have any macroscopic uterine involvement. The therapeutic value of routine hysterectomy at the initial operation for PPC should be further investigated.

Is semen an etiologic factor in the development of primary peritoneal carcinoma and epithelial ovarian cancer?

The existing medical literature was searched for epidemiologic and clinical observations that could point to the etiology of primary peritoneal carcinoma and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) using MEDLINE, hand searching of the most important gynecologic oncology journals and looking up all relevant cross references. Primary peritoneal carcinoma does not occur in males (only two cases reported in the literature) despite their possessing the same peritoneal surface as females. It is hypothesized that exposure of the peritoneal surface to components of semen (which occurs only in females) is important in the etio-pathogenesis of primary peritoneal carcinoma and the closely related sporadic EOC. The lack of an equivalent malignancy in pleura and pericardium (which have similar embryological derivations as peritoneum but never exposed to semen) in either sex and in tunica vaginalis (which is similar to the epithelial lining of ovary in females) in males lends credence to this hypothesis. Several other observations explained in detail in the paper are consistent with this line of reasoning. Case-control studies in patients of EOC/primary peritoneal carcinoma will clarify this issue. Experimental studies to study the carcinogenic potential of components of the semen on peritoneal surfaces in animal models are also in order.

[Metastatic cutaneous adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site. Case report]

BACKGROUND

Metastases may be the first manifestation of adenocarcinoma. Up to 60% are cutaneous and present in advanced stage neoplasms. Research for the primary site is costly and requires endoscopy, imaging and immunohistochemical exams. The primary site becomes obvious in only 15% to 20% of live patients and is detected mainly at autopsy.

AIM

To report a case of metastatic cutaneous moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma of unknown primary site, located in the lower left abdomen.

RESULTS

The lesion was surgically resected. Primary site was not found by any imaging or endoscopy exams. The immunohistochemistry was negative for CEA, CK20, PSA and positive for CK7. Based on these exams, prostate and colorectal cancer were excluded. The pancreas and biliary tract were considered as the probable primary site.

CONCLUSION

The research for the primary site still is difficult, expensive and is not effective to the treatment of metastatic adenocarcinomas.

Expression of Cox-2, CD34, Bcl-2, and p53 and survival in patients with primary peritoneal serous carcinoma and primary ovarian serous carcinoma

The objective of this study was to compare the immunohistochemical profile and clinical course of primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPC) and primary ovarian serous carcinoma (OSC). These entities are virtually indistinguishable morphologically, but their differential molecular and clinical features are incompletely characterized. Twenty-nine cases of high-grade, high-stage PPC and 96 cases of stage matched OSCs were compared. PPC was identified based on the criteria proposed by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. The tumors were staged according to International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics criteria for ovarian cancer and graded according to World Health Organization criteria. Expression of Cox-2, CD-34, bcl-2, and p53 was compared in the two tumors and correlated with clinical data including stage, age, race, and overall survival. Although the median survival, using Kaplan-Meier test, of patients with OSC (1060 days, 35.3 months) was longer than those with PPC (708 days, 23.6 months) the difference was not statistically significant. However, Cox-2 expression was correlated with microvessel density in PPC (p=0.026) and OSC cases (p=0.005), and high expression of Cox-2 correlated with lower survival rate in OSC cases (p=0.045) but not in PPC cases (p=0.12). These findings, coupled with the morphologic overlap existing between OSC and PPC, support the view that they represent related pathologic entities.

Comparison between primary peritoneal and epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to characterize primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) compared with ovarian carcinoma (OvC).

STUDY DESIGN

Within the framework of a nationwide epidemiologic Israeli study, 95 PPC patients were identified and compared with 117 FIGO stage III-IV epithelial OvC patients matched by age and continent of birth. Data were abstracted from medical records and personal interviews.

RESULTS

Our data confirm the similarities between PPC and OvC. A higher rate of abdominal distention, volume of ascites, and malignant cells in ascitic fluid and lower rate of pelvic palpable mass and personal breast cancer history were found in the PPC compared with the OvC group. The overall survival was similar in both groups (30-33 months). In optimally cytoreduced patients, survival was better in the OvC group. Diameter of residual disease was associated with better survival only in the OvC group.

CONCLUSION

The clinical differences do not enable a preoperative distinction between the neoplasms.

Peritoneal carcinoma in women with genetic susceptibility: implications for Jewish populations

Women from families with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer, specifically those who carry cancer-associated mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at increased life-time risk for peritoneal carcinoma, even after previous surgery to remove the ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus. Hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and the associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are particularly prevalent in women of Jewish lineage, and specific BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations have been linked with peritoneal carcinoma and HBOC syndrome in Jewish populations, especially those of Ashkenazi descent. This review presents the currently available data and looks forward toward further and better understanding of peritoneal carcinoma in women with inherited susceptibility. Over 90% of peritoneal cancer in patients from HBOC syndrome kindreds and associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are serous carcinomas, which is equivalent with the proportion of ovarian cancers that are serous carcinomas in similar patients. The best indications are that while many peritoneal carcinomas in genetically susceptible women may arise directly from malignant transformation of the peritoneum, others might represent metastases from primary ovarian or fallopian tube carcinomas. Although the incidence of borderline ovarian tumors may not be increased in HBOC syndrome kindreds and those who carry cancer-associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, these individuals could be susceptible to malignant transformation of borderline lesions of the ovaries and peritoneum. Moreover, recent reports raise the question of possibly increased risk in Jewish carriers of germline BRCA1 mutations for uterine papillary serous carcinoma, which could be the source of metastasis to the peritoneum in some cases. The penetrance of cancer-associated BRCA1 mutations for ovarian cancer is estimated to be 11%-54%, and for BRCA2 mutations the penetrance for ovarian cancer is 11%-23%. So far, available screening methods appear to be insufficient for early detection of many ovarian cancers. Prophylactic oophorectomy has been found to reduce the risk for ovarian cancer in women from HBOC kindreds and those who carry cancer-associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, leaving a residual risk for peritoneal carcinomatosis of well less than 5%. Therefore, surgical removal of the ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus, after child-bearing has been completed and by early in the fifth decade of life, are appropriate prophylactic procedures in women whose genetic susceptibility puts them at increased risk for cancers of mullerian tract origin, including ovarian and fallopian tube carcinomas and possibly serous carcinoma of the uterus. Hysterectomy, as well as salpingo-oophorectomy, removes the gynecologic organs targeted for malignant transformation in genetically susceptible women and simplifies decisions regarding hormone replacement therapy and chemical prophylaxis and treatment of breast cancer. Unless a transabdominal operative approach is otherwise indicated, laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal techniques are well suited for intra-abdominal exploration, cytology, biopsies and prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomy in women with hereditary susceptibility to gynecologic cancer.

Molecular similarities between primary peritoneal and primary ovarian carcinomas

The objective of this paper was to characterize expression patterns of biologic markers to distinguish papillary serous peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) from papillary serous ovarian carcinoma (POC). Immunohistochemical analysis of HER-2/neu, p53, bcl-2, and nm23-H1 expression was performed on archival paraffin-embedded tissues. Antigen expression was compared at ovarian and extra-ovarian sites. Thirty-two PPC cases were compared to 18 POC cases. Mean age, stage, grade, and survival outcome were comparable between the two groups. Antigen expression patterns were not significantly different between PPC and POC for the four markers studied. In all cases, nm23-H1 was expressed. Conversely, bcl-2 was expressed at only a single tissue site in three of 32 (9.4%) PPC cases and in one of 18 (5.6%) POC cases. Eleven of 32 (34.4%) PPC cases overexpressed HER-2/neu, vs. four of 18 (22.2%) POC cases. P53 staining results were positive in 23 of 32 (71.9%) PPC and 13 of 18 (72.2%) POC cases. Intrapatient antigen expression was identical at primary and metastatic tumor sites in 50% of the POC and 48.4% of the PPC cases. We conclude that PPC and POC have a comparable immunohistochemical phenotype for these four molecular markers, which is reflected by their similar clinical courses.

Cancer from an unknown primary site

Cancer from an unknown primary site (CUP) is frequently encountered in clinical practice. This review is designed to help physicians identify those patients with CUP that benefit from specific therapeutic approaches. The utility of pathologic and diagnostic tests in patients with CUP will also be discussed, as will the prognosis and appropriate treatment of these patients.

Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a phase II trial of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide with comparison to a cohort with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma-a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were first, to assess the clinical effectiveness of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide in a phase II study involving a well-defined group of women with extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (EPSPC); and second, to compare these results with those of a group of patients with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma (PSOC) who received identical therapy.

METHODS

After primary surgery, patients were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m(2) every 21 days for six cycles. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, clinical and surgical response to treatment, progression-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated. These patients were then compared with patients with PSOC who received identical treatment on a separate protocol.

RESULTS

Women with a diagnosis of tended to be older that those with EPSPC PSOC (median age: 65.8 years vs 60.3 years, P = 0.04). The estimated probability of clinical response (complete and partial) to the treatment regimen for EPSPC was 65% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 41-85%) compared with 59% (95% CI: 47-71%) for women with PSOC. Surgical complete responses were similar (20% vs 19%) in the two patient groups. Additionally, the death rates did not significantly differ between the two groups (hazard ratio: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.834-1.88).

CONCLUSION

Women with EPSPC and PSOC exhibit a similar probability of response to cisplatin and cyclophosphamide and a similar overall survival. Based on these findings and the fact that results of ovarian cancer trials are frequently extrapolated to patients with EPSPC, it is reasonable to include EPSPC patients in future large-scale treatment trials involving patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Lymphatic spread among women with primary peritoneal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Our knowledge regarding the pathologic lymphatic spread pattern of primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) is limited. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and the pathologic patterns of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases among women with PPC and those with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma (PSOC).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study over the last 4 years among women with FIGO stage III and IV PPC and PSOC who had optimal primary cytoreductive surgery (<1 cm residual). The same surgeon performed pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on all the patients using a similar technique. The same pathologist reviewed all lymph nodes and recorded nodal involvement with cancer, diameter of the largest nodal tumor, capsular integrity, and pattern of immune response (lymphocyte predominant, germinal cell predominant, unstimulated, or lymphocyte depletion). Both groups were compared in their characteristics, FIGO stage, tumor grade, number of lymph nodes, proportion of lymph nodes with metastases, and the pathologic characteristics of the positive lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Eleven women had PPC and 27 had PSOC. Patients with PPC were older than those with PSOC (mean age: 63.2 years +/- 11.0 vs. 57.4 +/- 13.4, P = 0.181). There was no difference in FIGO stage or tumor grade between both groups. There was no difference among the mean numbers of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes between women with PPC and those with PSOC (10.8 +/- 7.3 vs. 11.0 +/- 6.7 and 3.0 +/- 3.3 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.1, P = 0.768 and 0.706, respectively). The incidences of pelvic, para-aortic, and pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases were similar among women with PPC and those with PSOC (72.7% vs. 66.6%, P = 0.701, 72.7% vs. 48.1%, P = 0.172, and 72.7% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.736, respectively). Similarly, pelvic and para-aortic nodal tumor size, capsular integrity, and immune response were similar in both groups. The incidence of significant complications related to lymphadenectomy was low among women with PPC and those with PSOC (9.1% vs. 7.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PPC and PSOC exhibit similar pathologic lymphatic spread patterns. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be considered among women with PPC in whom the tumor could be optimally cytoreduced.

Primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a new epidemiologic trend? A matched-case comparison with ovarian serous papillary cancer

The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PPSPC) as compared with ovarian serous papillary cancer (OSPC), and to study the clinicopathologic features and the frequency of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in patients with PPSPC compared with those with OSPC. The study group included 28 cases of PPSPC. The comparison group included 35 female patients with OSPC, matched for stage, grade, and histologic subtype. All tumors were staged as either IIIB, IIIC or IV according to FIGO criteria. The patient characteristics, family and personal history of malignancies, the prevalence of germline BRCA mutations, clinicopathologic findings, presenting symptoms, pre- and intraoperative findings, and survival were compared in a matched-case retrospective study comparing patients with PPSPC vs. those with OSPC. Statistical analysis was made using Student's t-test, Chi-square, Wilcoxon, Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. Women with PPSPC had a significantly earlier menarche (P = 0.037) and a higher number or births (P = 0.03) than women with OSPC. No difference was found with regard to the prevalence of germline BRCA mutations in women with PPSPC compared with women with OSPC (7.1% vs. 25.7%). There was a significant increase (P = 0.02) in the incidence of abdominal distension as reported by PPSPC (64%) vs. OSPC patients (26%). Significantly more women with PPSPC than with OSPC presented with clinical ascites (P = 0.0001) and without palpable pelvic mass (P = 0.000001). On exploratory laparotomy, significantly more women with PPSPC than with OSPC had a minimal disease in the pelvis (P = 0.0087). Three-year survival analysis demonstrated a significantly worse survival rate for the PPSPC group than for the OSPC group (P = 0.017). A significant increase in the prevalence of PPSPC compared with OSPC was observed during the study years (P = 0.00001). We concluded that PPSPC and OSPC might be two distinct cancers, presenting a new epidemiologic trend regarding the increased incidence of PPSPC.

Allelotype of papillary serous peritoneal carcinomas

OBJECTIVE

Papillary serous peritoneal carcinoma (PSPC) is histologically indistinguishable from papillary serous ovarian carcinoma (PSOC) with a similar clinical presentation, yet may differ in its carcinogenesis. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of allelic loss and the frequency of p53 mutation by p53 overexpression in PSPC compared to PSOC.

METHODS

An allelotype analysis of 26 patients with PSPC was performed using 39 microsatellite markers from 25 chromosomal arms. Thirty-seven previously studied patients with PSOC served as the comparison. P53 mutations were detected by immunohistochemical protein overexpression.

RESULTS

There was significantly less LOH in PSPC than PSOC. Both the number of chromosomes with LOH and the proportion of tumors with allelic loss were less frequent. Significant LOH, defined as >/=30% of informative tumors having loss at a chromosome locus, was seen on 4 chromosome arms in PSPC: 12p, 17p, 17q, and 18q, compared to 18 arms in PSOC: 4q, 5q, 6p, 6q, 9p, 9q, 12p, 12q, 13q, 15q, 16q, 17p, 17q, 18q, 19p, 19q, 22q, and Xq (P < 0.001). The median LOH frequency was higher in PSOC than PSPC, 43% versus 33%, respectively (P = 0.013), and more PSOC tumors had LOH than PSPC tumors, 91% versus 65% (P = 0.042). P53 overexpression was detected in 80% of PSPC tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

LOH occurs less frequently in PSPC compared to PSOC. Chromosomal regions with high frequencies of LOH common to PSPC and PSOC, such as 12p, 17p, 17q, and 18q, may harbor tumor suppressor genes important in the carcinogenesis of both malignancies and likely include p53.

Primary papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum in a man

BACKGROUND

Primary papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum is a well-known entity in women. The tumour is derived from the extraovarian mesothelium and the pelvis and lower abdomen mesothelia. The treatment strategies are similar to ovarian serous papillary carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A case of primary serous papillary carcinoma of the peritoneum in a man is presented. The patient, 53 years old, died 2 months after diagnosis.

RESULTS

The histologic and immunohistochemical studies of the tumour will be presented. These studies, made during lifetime and at autopsy of the patient, confirm a diagnosis of primary serous papillary carcinoma of the peritoneum.

CONCLUSIONS

primary serous papillary carcinoma of the peritoneum can occur in men, and should be considered in the differential diagnosis in cases of abdominal carcinomatosis of unknown origin. Treatment options remain to be determined.

Extreme drug resistance assay and response to chemotherapy in patients with primary peritoneal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The extreme drug resistance (EDR) assay is an in vitro chemoresistance assay performed on tumor samples grown in culture and is claimed to predict drugs unlikely to produce response. Its clinical value in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has recently been questioned. The aim of this study is to describe EDR assay results and responses to chemotherapy among women with primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma (PPA) and to compare them with those of women with EOC.

METHODS

Fresh tumor specimens from 20 consecutive women with PPA were tested for EDR to the following drugs: cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide, hexamethylmelamine, and topotecan. They were then treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. The results of the EDR assay and response to chemotherapy were compared with those among women with EOC.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of EDR to cisplatin, carboplatin, paclitaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, etoposide, hexamethylmelamine, and topotecan among patients with PPA and those with EOC. The response rate of PPA patients to chemotherapy was 80.0% and unrelated to EDR to the individual drugs used in combination chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The EDR profile and response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy among women with PPA were similar to those among women with EOC. These findings support treating both conditions similarly. EDR to individual drugs does not preclude response to combination chemotherapy.

Prognostic factors in extraovarian primary peritoneal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pathological, clinical, and therapeutic factors which had prognostic significance in women with extraovarian primary peritoneal carcinoma (EOPPC).

METHODS

A retrospective, clinicopathologic study was conducted of 75 women diagnosed with EOPPC. Diagnosis and assessment of prognostic pathological factors were based on the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) criteria. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the following factors for their effect on overall survival: age, parity, presenting symptoms and signs, ascites, CA 125 level, history of oophorectomy, maximum ovarian dimension, histologic type, architectural and nuclear grades, number of mitosis and psammoma bodies, depth of ovarian invasion, estrogen and progesterone receptors (positive, negative), p53 overexpression (present, absent), performance status (GOG criteria), stage (FIGO criteria for ovarian cancer), debulking surgery (optimal versus suboptimal), first-line chemotherapy (platin-based without paclitaxel versus platin/paclitaxel), secondary cytoreduction, and second-line chemotherapy (paclitaxel-based versus no paclitaxel).

RESULTS

The median overall survival of all patients was 23.5 months (95% CI 18.6, 39.8 months). The 5-year survival was 26.5% (SE 6.7%). p53 overexpression and estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity were demonstrated in 42.4, 50.0, and 6.3%, respectively. In univariate analysis, performance status, primary debulking surgery, stage, and age were significant on overall survival (P < 0.001, <0. 001, 0.004, and 0.012, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only performance status (P < 0.001) and primary debulking surgery (P = 0. 03) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusions. Overall survival in women with EOPPC is affected significantly by performance status and primary debulking surgery as independent variables. To improve survival, efforts should be made to achieve optimal tumor cytoreduction at primary surgery.

Peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma: study of 15 cases and comparison with stage III-IV ovarian papillary serous carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma (PPSC) is histologically and clinically similar to stage III-IV ovarian papillary serous carcinoma (OPSC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical findings, treatment, and outcome of PPSC patients compared with stage III-IV OPSC patients.

METHODS

Data from the files of 15 PPSC patients and 52 stage III-IV OPSC patients who were managed at the Soroka Medical Center between January 1991 and December 1997 were evaluated.

RESULTS

With regard to patients' characteristics, presenting signs and symptoms, type and extent of surgery, tumor response to first-line chemotherapy, recurrence-free interval, recurrence site, tumor response to second-line chemotherapy, and serum CA-125 levels, no significant differences were observed between the PPSC patients and the stage III-IV OPSC controls. The prevailing presenting symptoms were abdominal mass and ascites. The mainstay of treatment was debulking surgery followed by adjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy. The objective response rate to first-line chemotherapy was 80%. The actuarial 5-year survival rate for the PPSC patients and stage III-IV OPSC patients was 52.0% and 20.5%, respectively (0.05 < P < 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and surgical characteristics of patients with PPSC are similar to those of patients with stage III-IV OPSC. When treatment strategies for stage III-IV OPSC are applied to PPSC, the survival of PPSC patients may be similar or even better than that of stage III-IV OPSC patients.

Grade 1 peritoneal serous carcinomas: a report of 14 cases and comparison with 7 peritoneal serous psammocarcinomas and 19 peritoneal serous borderline tumors

Low-grade peritoneal serous carcinomas have been the subject of limited study, and their distinction from peritoneal serous psammocarcinomas and serous borderline tumors is not always easy. The clinicopathologic features of 14 low-grade serous carcinomas, 7 psammocarcinomas, and 19 serous borderline tumors of peritoneal origin were compared. Average ages were 58 years (low-grade serous carcinomas), 48 years (borderline tumors), and 40 years (psammocarcinomas). Typical clinical presentations were abdominal pain, abdominal mass, or both, with the tumors incidental in 37% (borderline tumors), 43% (psammocarcinomas), and 36% (low-grade serous carcinoma). Operative and gross findings varied from nodules to adhesions to a dominant mass. Treatment was surgical debulking in most cases, with biopsy alone for eight borderline tumors. Seven patients with low-grade serous carcinoma were alive when last seen, but follow-up duration is short (average, 1.2 years): five were without disease, one had recurrent disease and one persistent disease. One patient with serous carcinoma died of disease at 3.5 years, and two patients died of other causes. Three patients with psammocarcinoma were alive without disease (average 3.3 years). Fourteen patients with borderline tumors were alive (average 3 years): 10 were without disease, 2 had persistent disease, and serous carcinoma developed in 2. The low-grade serous carcinomas resembled the invasive implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors. lacked high-grade nuclear atypia, showed tissue, lymphovascular space invasion, or both and had appreciable solid epithelial proliferation. Some serous carcinomas showed abundant psammomatous calcification suggesting psammocarcinoma but had too much epithelial proliferation for that diagnosis. The psammocarcinomas showed at least 75% psammoma bodies, no more than moderate cytological atypia, tissue or lymphovascular space invasion, or both, and rare epithelial proliferation less than 15 cells across. Adequate sampling was necessary to identify invasion, with highest yields of invasive foci in omental samples; individual foci in some cases of carcinoma resembled borderline tumor. The serous borderline tumors resembled the noninvasive implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors, lacked invasion, and did not show nuclear atypia of the degree seen in grade 2 or grade 3 serous carcinoma. Low-grade serous carcinoma, psammocarcinoma, and serous borderline tumors of peritoneal origin share some clinicopathologic features and may be underrecognized at surgery and gross examination. Because of overlapping microscopic patterns, adequate sampling is mandatory to identify small foci of invasion that exclude a borderline tumor and identify significant cellularity that excludes a psammocarcinoma. Conservative therapy is merited for younger women with borderline tumors. Maximum debulking is recommended for bulky symptomatic borderline tumors, low-grade serous carcinoma, and psammocarcinoma. Although short-term outcomes for the carcinomas appear favorable, follow-up is too limited to determine long-term outcomes.

Importance of lymph node metastases in primary peritoneal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The incidence and significance of lymph node involvement in patients with primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma (PPA) are unknown. The aim of the current study is to report on the incidence and significance of clinically or surgically detectable lymphadenopathy in women with PPA.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective clinical review of patients with the confirmed diagnosis of PPA treated at Roswell Park Cancer Institute between 1982 and 1996. Patients with clinically or surgically detectable lymphadenopathy confirmed on histologic examination to be secondary to metastases from PPA were identified and compared to patients with negative lymph nodes with regard to clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, response to treatment, and survival.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients with PPA were identified. Pelvic and periaortic lymph node biopsies or sampling were performed in 35% of the patients. In 8/72 patients (11%), lymphadenopathy was one of the presenting clinical or surgical findings. The clinicopathologic features, treatment, response to first-line chemotherapy, and estimated median overall survival were not different in patients with or without lymph node involvement (71.4% vs. 69.7%, P = 1.0, and 21.5 vs. 23.5 months, P = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Lymph node involvement is not an infrequent occurrence in patients with PPA and does not seem to be of adverse prognostic significance.

Molecular evidence for multifocal papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum in patients with germline BRCA1 mutations

BACKGROUND

Papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum (PSCP) diffusely involves peritoneal surfaces, while it spares or only superficially involves the ovaries. PSCP is histologically indistinguishable from serous epithelial ovarian carcinoma, and it may develop years after oophorectomy. The molecular pathogenesis of PSCP remains unresolved, although preliminary data suggest a multifocal origin in some cases. Patients with germline BRCA1 mutations may develop PSCP in addition to breast and ovarian carcinomas. The purpose of this study was to utilize the androgen receptor (AR) gene locus to test the hypothesis that some cases of PSCP have a multifocal origin and to determine if patients with germline BRCA1 mutations develop multifocal PSCP.

METHODS

Specimens of normal and tumor tissues from 22 women with PSCP were obtained, and DNA was extracted. The AR gene locus was evaluated for patterns of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and X-chromosome inactivation. The methylation-sensitive Hpa II restriction enzyme was used to differentiate the active and inactive X chromosomes. Germline BRCA1 mutation status of the patients was determined previously.

RESULTS

Genetic analysis of tumor specimens indicated that five (23%) of 22 case subjects had patterns of selective LOH at the AR locus, consistent with multifocal, polyclonal disease origin. Two patients with selective LOH also had alternating X-chromosome inactivation patterns. Patients with germline BRCA1 mutations were more likely to have evidence of multifocal disease (two-sided Fisher's exact test, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that PSCP has a multifocal origin in at least some cases. Furthermore, patients with germline BRCA1 mutations are more likely to develop multifocal PSCP than are patients without BRCA1 mutations.

Two sequential studies for primary peritoneal carcinoma: induction with weekly cisplatin followed by either cisplatin-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel-cisplatin

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the results of therapy with induction with weekly cisplatin followed by the combination of cisplatin-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (PAC) or the combination paclitaxel-cisplatin (TP) as first-line chemotherapy in patients with primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma (PPA).

METHODS

Between October 1988 and July 1996, 46 patients with PPA were treated with PAC (n = 25) or TP (n = 21) following cytoreductive surgery in two sequential trials. In trial 1, patients received induction with weekly cisplatin (1 mg/kg) x 4 followed by monthly cisplatin (50 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2), and doxorubicin (50 mg/m2) for 10 cycles. In trial 2, patients received induction with weekly cisplatin (1 mg/kg) x 4 followed by monthly cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m2) over 24 hr for 6 cycles. Surgical assessment of response was performed in 15 (60.0%) and 13 (61.9%) patients in the PAC and TP trials, respectively. Estimated survival and progression-free survival distributions were calculated by the method of Kaplan and Meier. Survival curves were compared using the log rank test.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between patients in either treatment arm with respect to median age, substage, percentage of patients undergoing optimal cytoreductive surgery, median preoperative CA125 values, performance status, proportion of patients who had second-look procedures, or median cumulative doses of cisplatin. The incidence of nausea and vomiting as well as peripheral neuropathy was significantly higher among patients who received TP (P = 0.005 and 0.022, respectively). The overall response, surgical response, and complete surgical response were not statistically different among patients who received PAC and those who received TP (62.5% versus 70.0%, P = 0.75, 73.3% versus 76.9%, P = 0.1, and 13.3% versus 23.1%, P = 0.64, respectively). Patients who underwent optimal cytoreductive surgery demonstrated higher response than patients whose tumors could not be optimally cytoreduced (76.7% versus 42.9%, P = 0.04). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival or time to progression/recurrence between the PAC and TP groups (median 21.5 versus 24.0 months, P = 0.68, and 17.3 versus 24.0 months, P = 0.59, respectively). In both treatment groups combined, 18 of 32 patients whose tumors were optimally cytoreduced and 3 of 14 patients whose tumors were suboptimally cytoreduced had surgically verified response. Patients who underwent optimal cytoreductive surgery exhibited longer survival than those who underwent suboptimal cytoreductive surgery (median 29.4 versus 18.6 months, P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PAC and TP regimens are effective combinations in patients with PPA. The median survival was similar following PAC and TP but the responses and time to recurrence/progression were nonsignificantly better in the paclitaxel combination.

Primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma metastatic to the brain

Primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma is a relatively newly identified disease entity whose clinical behavior is not fully recognized. We report a case of a patient with progressive primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma who developed brain metastases and died shortly afterward. The incidence of central nervous system metastases in 72 patients with documented primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma was 1.4%. The risk factors, clinical behavior, and prognosis of patients with primary peritoneal adenocarcinoma metastatic to the central nervous system seem to be similar to those of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer metastatic to the central nervous system.

Primary peritoneal carcinoma: a treatable subset of patients with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary

The syndrome of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary (ACUP) is a frequent problem in both medical and surgical practice. The prognosis is poor, the median lifespan being 4 months. In general, multiple invasive procedures aimed at determining the primary tumour are not warranted due to the low frequency of detecting a tumour for which adequate treatment exists. In this paper we wish to highlight a subset of female patients presenting with malignant ascites and no evidence of a pelvic mass, who on laparotomy were found to have primary peritoneal papillary serous adenocarcinoma. These tumours must be regarded as a potentially treatable subset of patients with ACUP in view of their frequent response to chemotherapy and relatively good prognosis.

Primary neoplasia of the female peritoneum

Primary neoplasms of the female peritoneum may be mesothelial or Müllerian in nature. Primary mesotheliomas may be cystic, benign papillary or diffuse malignant. Primary Müllerian tumours of the peritoneum are thought to arise within the secondary Müllerian system: the overwhelming majority are serous in nature and probably develop from pre-existing endosalpingiosis. Primary peritoneal serous tumours of borderline malignancy are identical histologically to the peritoneal 'implants' found in association with ovarian serous tumours of borderline malignancy, whereas primary peritoneal serous adenocarcinomas are histologically identical to ovarian serous adenocarcinomas. The recognition of a primary peritoneal serous neoplasm of borderline malignancy rests on the presence of either normal ovaries, ovaries containing only a fully benign neoplasm or ovaries showing only minimal surface involvement. The diagnosis of a primary peritoneal serous adenocarcinoma is made if the ovaries are of normal size with either no tumour or only minimal surface involvement: in some cases normal ovaries will have previously been prophylactically removed because of a family history of ovarian cancer. The differential diagnosis between a primary serous adenocarcinoma and a diffuse malignant mesothelioma can be difficult and is often not resolved by either electronmicroscopy or immunocytochemistry.

Characterization of in vitro chemosensitivity of perioperative human ovarian malignancies by adenosine triphosphate chemosensitivity assay

We report the in vitro chemosensitivity of primary and recurrent human ovarian tumor samples analyzed by adenosine triphosphate chemosensitivity assay. We defined sensitivity as a greater than or equal to 70% decrease in intracellular adenosine triphosphate versus control at 20% of the reported peak plasma concentration per agent tested. Twenty of 21 assays (95.24%) were completed successfully. Single-agent and combined dose-response patterns consisting of decreasing viability with increasing drug concentration were observed consistently. Thirteen primary tumors were assayed, with 15.4% sensitive to cisplatin, 7.7% sensitive to 4-hydroxycyclophosphamide and 53.8% sensitive to their combination. Seven recurrent tumors were assayed, with 14.3% sensitive to cisplatin, 28.6% sensitive to 5-fluorouracil, and 42.9% sensitive to their combination. Dose-response characteristics and in vitro sensitivity rates reported in this article are consistent with reports of patient response in the literature. We conclude that adenosine triphosphate chemosensitivity assay is an efficient and reliable instrument for the in vitro chemosensitivity assessment of human tumors and warrants further clinical investigation.

Primary peritoneal papillary serous adenocarcinoma: clinical and management aspects

From January 1, 1984 to April 30, 1990, 38 patients were surgically found to have an intraabdominal disease resembling epithelial ovarian cancer. This diagnosis was confirmed in 31 patients; the remaining 7 met the criteria of primary peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma. Five of these were diagnosed retrospectively and two during surgery. The mean age at diagnosis was 61.2 years. Tumor histology revealed papillary serous carcinoma in six and mixed (papillary serous and papillary clear cell carcinoma) in one patient. Optimal debulking was achieved in three of seven cases (42.8%). Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy was administered to all in the study group. Complete response was obtained in four patients, with one surviving for 76 months. The median survival in these patients was 34.5 months (range 6-76 months). Currently, three patients with complete response are alive with clinically undetectable disease. CA-125 assays were available in three cases and blood levels corroborated the clinically determined status of the disease. Tumor steroid hormone receptor status was determined in one case and revealed low levels of estrogen and progesterone receptors. To the best of our knowledge, the usefulness of CA-125 in the diagnosis, management, follow-up, and determination of tumor steroid hormone receptor status, mixed papillary serous and clear cell subtype histological patterns for primary peritoneal papillary serous carcinoma are first described in this report. It seems that this neoplasm may be treated and followed up as in epithelial ovarian cancer, obtaining long-term survival; however, the biologic behavior and management problems of this relatively new entity deserve further clinical experience.

Papillary serous carcinoma of the peritoneum. A review of 33 cases treated with platin-based chemotherapy

Thirty-three patients were identified who had papillary serious carcinoma of the peritoneum (PSCP). The gross operative specimens, histopathologic condition, and treatment records were reviewed. The median age at presentation was 60 years (age range, 22 to 78 years). Abdominal pain and distention were the most common presenting symptoms. All patients had a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and all but two had debulking surgery. All patients had disease involving the omentum, the abdominal and pelvic peritoneum, and the surface of the ovaries, but none had intrinsic disease of the ovaries. Eight patients had disease outside of the abdominal cavity. Seven of these patients had malignant pleural effusions. All patients received platin-based chemotherapy. Sixteen patients underwent second-look laparotomy, two had no evidence of disease, and one had microscopic disease only. The median survival time for all patients was 17 months. Three patients are alive 6 to 7 years after the initial diagnosis. In conclusion, long-term survival can be achieved in some PSCP patients by debulking surgery and platin-based chemotherapy.

Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 31 cases

The rate and clinical features of patients admitted to King George V Hospital with extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma during a 9-year period were reviewed. In this time, 31 of 236 (13%) patients with an initial diagnosis of invasive serous ovarian carcinoma fulfilled the surgicopathologic criteria for this entity. All patients had disseminated tumor equivalent to ovarian Stage III and IV disease (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO]) and with predominantly high-grade neoplasms. They were managed by surgical exploration, tumor debulking where possible, and postoperative chemotherapy. A comparison with a contemporaneous series of 139 patients with primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma matched for stage and grade of disease and managed similarly showed no difference in actuarial survival. The median survival times were 11.3 months for patients with extraovarian serous papillary carcinomas and 13.5 months for patients with equivalent primary ovarian neoplasms. The features of the disease and the treatment regimens used are discussed.