Coadministration of gabapentin or MK-801 with lamotrigine slows tolerance to its anticonvulsant effects on kindled seizures

Tolerance to the beneficial effects of prophylactic migraine drugs: a systematic review of causes and mechanisms

Loss of benefit of a previously effective treatment regimen, also known as tolerance, can be an important barrier to the successful preventive treatment of migraine. We undertook a systematic review of the literature to identify the prevalence and possible mechanisms of drug tolerance in migraine prophylaxis. Results demonstrate that the frequency of tolerance to prophylactic migraine treatment is unknown, but available data support an estimate that it occurs in 1-8% of patients receiving prophylaxis. Four broad types of tolerance were identified that are likely to be relevant to migraine prophylaxis. These are pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, behavioral, and cross tolerance. The mechanisms that underlie these types of tolerance determine whether their effects can be overcome or minimized. For example, certain forms of tolerance may be affected by manipulation of environmental cues associated with drug administration, by the order in which drugs are used, and by the concomitant use of other medications. Many medications used for migraine prophylaxis exert their effects through the endogenous opioid system. The implications of this finding are explored, particularly the parallels between medication overuse headache and tolerance to migraine prophylaxis. Given the many ways in which tolerance to migraine medications may develop, in some ways it is not surprising that migraine-preventive drugs stop working; it is more surprising that in many cases they do not.

Tolerance to the prophylactic effects of carbamazepine and related mood stabilizers in the treatment of bipolar disorders

Tolerance development after successful long‐term treatment of bipolar disorder is under recognized, as are ways to prevent or show its occurrence or reverse it once it has occurred. We review the clinical literature which suggests that tolerance can develop to most treatment approaches in bipolar illness and present an animal model of tolerance development to anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine or lamotrigine on amgydala‐kindled seizures. In this model tolerance does not have a pharmacokinetic basis, but is contingent upon the drug being present in the brain at the time of amygdala stimulation. The occurrence of seizures in the absence of drug is sufficient to reverse tolerance and re‐establish anticonvulsant efficacy. Based on the model, we hypothesize that some episode‐induced compensatory adaptive changes in gene expression fail to occur in tolerant subjects and that episodes off medication re‐induce these changes and renew drug effectiveness. Approaches that slow or reverse tolerance development in the animal model are reviewed so that they can be tested for their applicability in the clinic. Criteria for assessing tolerance development are offered in the hope that this will facilitate a more systemic literature about its prevalence, prevention, and reversal. Careful longitudinal monitoring of episode occurrence is essential to understanding tolerance development in the affective disorder and its treatment.

Synergistic combinations of anticonvulsant agents: what is the evidence from animal experiments?

PURPOSE

Combination therapy is often used in the treatment of seizures refractory to monotherapy. At the same time, the pharmacodynamic mechanisms that determine the combined efficacy of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are unknown, and this prevents a rational use of these drug combinations. We critically evaluate the existing evidence for pharmacodynamic synergism between AEDs from preclinical studies in animal models of epilepsy to identify useful combinations of mechanisms and to determine whether study outcome depends on the various research methods that are in use.

METHODS

Published articles were included if the studies were placebo-controlled, in vivo, or ex vivo animal studies investigating marketed or experimental AEDs. The animal models that were used in these studies, the primary molecular targets of the tested drugs, and the methods of interpretation were recorded. The potential association of these factors with the study outcome (synergism: yes or no) was assessed through logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 107 studies were identified, in which 536 interaction experiments were conducted. In 54% of these experiments, the possibility of a pharmacokinetic interaction was not investigated. The majority of studies were conducted in the maximal electroshock model, and other established models were the pentylenetetrazole model, amygdala kindling, and the DBA/2 model. By far the most widely used method for interpretation of the results was evaluation of the effect of a threshold dose of one agent on the median effective dose (ED50) of another agent. Experiments relying on this method found synergism significantly more often compared with experiments relying on other methods (p<0.001). Furthermore, experiments including antagonists of the AMPA receptor were more likely to find synergism in comparison with all other experiments (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive preclinical research into the effects of AED combinations has not led to an understanding of the pharmacodynamic properties of AED combinations. Specifically, the majority of the preclinical studies are not adequately designed to distinguish between additive, synergistic, and antagonistic interactions. Quantitative pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies of selectively acting AEDs in a battery of animal models are necessary for the development of truly synergistic drug combinations.

Experimental and clinical evidence for loss of effect (tolerance) during prolonged treatment with antiepileptic drugs

Development of tolerance (i.e., the reduction in response to a drug after repeated administration) is an adaptive response of the body to prolonged exposure to the drug, and tolerance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is no exception. Tolerance develops to some drug effects much more rapidly than to others. The extent of tolerance depends on the drug and individual (genetic?) factors. Tolerance may lead to attenuation of side effects but also to loss of efficacy of AEDs and is reversible after discontinuation of drug treatment. Different experimental approaches are used to study tolerance in laboratory animals. Development of tolerance depends on the experimental model, drug, drug dosage, and duration of treatment, so that a battery of experimental protocols is needed to evaluate fully whether tolerance to effect occurs. Two major types of tolerance are known. Pharmacokinetic (metabolic) tolerance, due to induction of AED-metabolizing enzymes has been shown for most first-generation AEDs, and is easy to overcome by increasing dosage. Pharmacodynamic (functional) tolerance is due to "adaptation" of AED targets (e.g., by loss of receptor sensitivity) and has been shown experimentally for all AEDs that lose activity during prolonged treatment. Functional tolerance may lead to complete loss of AED activity and cross-tolerance to other AEDs. Convincing experimental evidence indicates that almost all first-, second-, and third-generation AEDs lose their antiepileptic activity during prolonged treatment, although to a different extent. Because of diverse confounding factors, detecting tolerance in patients with epilepsy is more difficult but can be done with careful assessment of decline during long-term individual patient response. After excluding confounding factors, tolerance to antiepileptic effect for most modern and old AEDs can be shown in small subgroups of responders by assessing individual or group response. Development of tolerance to the antiepileptic activity of an AED may be an important reason for failure of drug treatment. Knowledge of tolerance to AED effects as a mechanism of drug resistance in previous responders is important for patients, physicians, and scientists.

Experimental studies on reproductive toxicologic effects of lamotrigine in mice

BACKGROUND

Virtually all antiepileptic drugs (AED) tested so far have been found to be teratogenic. The second generation AED possess a number of therapeutic advantages over the older ones. There are, however, very little data on their effects on embryonic development. A recent report suggests that lamotrigine (LTG) can be teratogenic to human fetuses. With only a few cases of prenatal exposure to LTG in the record, however, it has not been possible to establish a recognizable pattern of malformations in the infants of LTG-treated mothers.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the reproductive toxic effects of LTG .

RESULTS

Single (50-200 mg/kg) or multiple doses (25, 50, 75 mg/kg) of LTG were administered by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection (note that the therapeutic administration is oral) to groups of TO mice on gestation day (GD) 7 or 8. Fetuses were collected on GD 18. Maternal toxic effects including a dose-related mortality, a high incidence of abortion, embryo lethality, congenital malformations and intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) were observed in the LTG-treated group. Administration of LTG in multiple low doses resulted in a better maternal survival and increased incidence of embryonic resorption and malformations with increasing dose; IUGR was significant but not dose-dependent. The malformations characteristic of the LTG multiple low dose group fetuses included maxillary-mandibular hypoplasia, exencephaly, cleft palate, median facial cleft, urogenital anomalies and varying degrees of caudal regression. Skeletal malformations and developmental delay of the skeleton were observed both in single and multiple dose groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that LTG administered i.p. at high doses can induce intrauterine growth retardation and at low multiple doses causes a dose-dependent increase in embryonic resorption, craniofacial and caudal malformations as well as maternal toxicity in the mouse. Previous studies in other laboratories have used oral route of exposure and concluded that there are no teratogenic effects of LTG at dose levels that are not maternally toxic.

Neurobiology of Seizures and Behavioral Abnormalities

Seizures are both caused by and induce a complex set of neurobiological alterations and adaptations. The animal model of amygdala kindling provides insight into the spatiotemporal evolution of these changes as a function of seizure development and progression. Intracellular, synaptic, and microstructural changes are revealed as related to both the primary pathophysiology of kindled seizure evolution and compensatory secondary, or endogenous anticonvulsant adaptations. At the level of gene expression, the balance of these pathological and adaptive processes (as augmented by exogenous medications) probably determines whether seizures will be manifest or suppressed and could account for aspects of their intermittency. As anxiety and emotion modulation are subserved by many of the same neuroanatomic substrates involved in the evolution of complex partial seizures, particularly those of the medial temporal lobe, it is readily conceptualized how vulnerability to a range of psychiatric disorders could be related to the primary or secondary neurochemical alterations associated with seizure disorders. The discrete and methodologically controlled elucidation of the cascades and spatiotemporal distributions of neurobiological alterations that accompany seizure evolution in the kindling model may help resolve some of the difficulty and complexity of elucidating these biobehavioral relationships in the clinic.

Convergences in course of illness and treatments of the epilepsies and recurrent affective disorders

The failure to achieve and maintain remission is a critical problem for a high percentage of patients with epilepsy and the primary affective disorders. Early illness onset and delayed initiation of treatment may contribute to primary treatment resistance or that associated with loss of efficacy (tolerance phenomenon). Neurobiological data and principles drawn from the amygdala kinding model of seizure progression are reviewed for their heuristic value in conceptualizing molecular mechanisms of illness progression and its prevention with pharmacological agents in the epilepsies and, indirectly, the recurrent affective disorders. Caveats in the use of this model and convergences and divergences in its predictive validity for seizures and affective disorders are noted.

Unidirectional Cross-tolerance from Levetiracetam to Carbamazepine in Amygdala-kindled Seizures

PURPOSE

Tolerance is a potential problem in long-term anticonvulsant therapy of epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and neuropathic pain. The present study was designed to determine whether cross-tolerance occurs between levetiracetam (LEV) and carbamazepine (CBZ) in amygdala-kindled rats.

METHODS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with an electrode into the left amygdala. While kindling stimulation was started, animals received repeated treatment (i.p.) with saline (n = 7) or LEV (150 mg/kg, n = 8). Saline-injected rats were subsequently challenged with a single dose of 150 mg/kg LEV when full kindling developed (stage > or =4). Both groups of rats were then administered long-term CBZ (5 mg/kg) until rats developed complete tolerance. All CBZ-tolerant rats were subsequently re-exposed to LEV (150 mg/kg) for an additional 10 consecutive days.

RESULTS

Repeated LEV treatment significantly suppressed the increase in seizure stage, seizure duration, and afterdischarge duration induced by amygdala stimulation, markedly increasing the number of stimulations to achieve a kindling major motor seizure. The LEV challenge produced a more robust suppression of seizure stage in saline-injected rats compared with LEV-treated animals. CBZ treatment markedly suppressed fully kindled seizures in rats initially injected with saline, and then anticonvulsant tolerance rapidly developed after 3-4 days of repeated treatment. In contrast, rats that had initially received repeated LEV treatment did not show a response to treatment with CBZ (5 mg/kg). When CBZ-tolerant rats were subsequently exposed to LEV (150 mg/kg), noticeable anticonvulsant effects were observed; but these were gradually lost with increasing numbers of LEV exposures.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas LEV shows potent antiepileptogenic and anticonvulsant effects in amygdala-kindled rats, its repeated treatment induces anticonvulsant tolerance and unidirectional cross-tolerance to CBZ. In contrast, anticonvulsant tolerance to CBZ does not transfer to LEV. The mechanistic implications of the present results for clinical therapeutics remain to be evaluated.

Potential mechanisms of action of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorders

Based on the mood-stabilizing properties of carbamazepine and valproate, new anticonvulsants have been explored for use in bipolar disorders. One such agent, lamotrigine, has a novel clinical profile in that it may "stabilize mood from below," as it appears to maximally impact depressive symptoms in bipolar disorders. In this paper, we review the mechanisms of action of lamotrigine in an effort to understand the basis of its distinctive clinical use in the management of bipolar disorders as well as its diverse antiseizure effects. We consider lamotrigine mechanisms, emphasizing commonalities and dissociations among actions of lamotrigine, older mood stabilizers, and other anticonvulsants. Although ion channel effects, especially sodium channel blockade, may importantly contribute to antiseizure effects, such actions may be less central to lamotrigine thymoleptic effects. Antiglutamatergic and neuroprotective actions are important candidate mechanisms for lamotrigine psychotropic effects. Lamotrigine has a variable profile in kindling and contingent tolerance experiments and does not appear to have robust gamma-aminobutyric acid or monoaminergic actions. Lamotrigine intracellular signaling effects warrant investigation. Although lamotrigine mechanisms overlap those of other mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants, important dissociations suggest candidate mechanisms, which could contribute to lamotrigine's distinctive psychotropic profile.