Fluticasone propionate powder administered through Diskhaler versus triamcinolone acetonide aerosol administered through metered-dose inhaler in patients with persistent asthma

Safety of SABA Monotherapy in Asthma Management: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) reliever overuse is common in asthma, despite availability of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based maintenance therapies, and may be associated with increased risk of adverse events (AEs). This systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the safety and tolerability of SABA reliever monotherapy for adults and adolescents with asthma, through analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence.

METHODS

An SLR of English-language publications between January 1996 and December 2021 included RCTs and observational studies of patients aged ≥ 12 years treated with inhaled SABA reliever monotherapy (fixed dose or as needed) for ≥ 4 weeks. Studies of terbutaline and fenoterol were excluded. Meta-analysis feasibility was dependent on cross-trial data comparability. A random-effects model estimated rates of mortality, serious AEs (SAEs), and discontinuation due to AEs (DAEs) for as-needed and fixed-dose SABA treatment groups. ICS monotherapy and SABA therapy were compared using a fixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were identified by the SLR for assessment of feasibility. Final meta-analysis included 24 RCTs. Too few observational studies (n = 2) were available for inclusion in the meta-analysis. One death unrelated to treatment was reported in each of the ICS, ICS + LABA, and fixed-dose SABA groups. No other treatment-related deaths were reported. SAE and DAE rates were < 4%. DAEs were reported more frequently in the SABA treatment groups than with ICS, potentially owing to worsening asthma symptoms being classified as an AE. SAE risk was comparable between SABA and ICS treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of data from RCTs showed that deaths were rare with SABA reliever monotherapy, and rates of SAEs and DAEs were comparable between SABA reliever and ICS treatment groups. When used appropriately within prescribed limits as reliever therapy, SABA does not contribute to excess rates of mortality, SAEs, or DAEs.

Airway mechanics after withdrawal of a leukotriene receptor antagonist in children with mild persistent asthma: Double-blind, randomized, cross-over study

BACKGROUND

To determine the response of airway mechanics and the changes in asthma symptoms to stepping down of leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) therapy.

METHODS

Thirty children (mean age: 7.1 years) with mild, well-controlled, and persistent asthma who took LTRA as maintenance treatment were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Each group received an LTRA (montelukast) or placebo daily for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week washout period, and then the alternate treatment for 2 weeks. Spirometry and impulse oscillation system (IOS) measurements before and after four puffs of salbutamol inhalation, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), and the childhood asthma control test (C-ACT) were evaluated at baseline, the end of placebo treatment, and the end of LTRA treatment.

RESULTS

Changes of FEV₁ /FVC (p = .113) and FEV₁ (p = .109) from baseline to posttreatment did not differ significantly between the placebo and montelukast groups. In the placebo group, prebronchodilator (pre-) FEV₁ /FVC was decreased (83% vs. 86%) and bronchodilator response (BDR) in FEV₁ was diminished (10.7% vs. 6.4%) at posttreatment compared with baseline. However, the montelukast group had no significant changes in pre-FEV₁ /FVC (p = .865) and BDR in FEV₁ (p = .461). In addition, compared with the montelukast group, the placebo group showed no significant changes in Rrs5 (total airway resistance), Rrs5-20 (peripheral airway resistance), FeNO, and symptoms by the C-ACT.

CONCLUSION

In children with well-controlled mild persistent asthma, changes in spirometry, IOS, FeNO, and C-ACT results did not differ between the placebo and montelukast groups within 2 weeks.

Assessing the risks and benefits of step-down asthma care: a case-based approach

Guidelines have called for pharmacologic stepped care to improve asthma treatment. Therapeutic options which have been approved provide physicians and their patients alternatives for stepping up asthma treatment to achieve control. However, few studies have been performed to identify and characterize procedures for optimal stepping-down treatment in patients with asthma. The resulting uncertainty as well as a lack of prioritization for asthma reassessment once control has been maintained has led to a lack of well-defined procedures for stepping down asthma treatment. However, recent studies provide guidance regarding the risks of stepping down asthma medications. This review uses case-based examples to demonstrate how health care providers may engage patients in discussions regarding guideline recommendations to promote individualized asthma care.

The risks, benefits, and uncertainties of stepping down asthma medications

Stepwise adjustments have been suggested as a framework to manage chronic asthma over time. In this framework, individuals with good asthma control and a low risk for future asthma exacerbations may be considered for a reduction or "step down" of their chronic asthma medications. In this article, we discuss how patients may benefit or be harmed by stepping down asthma medications. Based on the literature presented in this article, we recommend that clinicians discuss the option of stepping down with patients when symptoms are stable, lung function is near normal, and biomarkers (if measured) are near normal. Other factors that should be considered in the decision to step down include the length of asthma stability, age of the patient, time of year, and patient preferences. Reducing the dose of inhaled corticosteroid by 25% to 50% appears to be the safest method of stepping down. A clear plan of care and follow-up is needed when stepping down asthma medications because many patients are likely to have recurrent exacerbations.

The risk of asthma exacerbation after stopping low-dose inhaled corticosteroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Current asthma guidelines suggest that patients and their providers consider decreasing or stopping controller medications when asthma is stable.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to estimate the risk of asthma exacerbation in patients who stop low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) compared with those who continue ICSs in randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

We identified relevant trials from a systematic review of English-language and non-English-language articles using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL (inception to January 21, 2012). Articles were screened at the abstract and full-text level by 2 independent reviewers. We included randomized controlled trials with a stable asthma run-in period of 4 weeks or more, an intervention to stop or continue ICSs, and a follow-up period of at least 3 months. We pooled results using a random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 1798 potential articles, of which 172 were reviewed at the full-text level and 7 met the criteria for inclusion. The relative risk for an asthma exacerbation in patients who stopped ICSs compared with those who continued use was 2.35 (95% CI, 1.88-2.92; P < .001; I(2) = 0%), as determined by using data pooled from trials with a mean follow-up of 27 weeks. The pooled absolute risk difference for an asthma exacerbation was 0.23 (95% CI, 0.16-0.30; P < .001; I(2) = 44%). Patients who discontinued ICSs also had a decreased FEV1 of 130 mL (95% CI, 40-210 mL; P = .003; I(2) = 53%), a decreased mean morning peak expiratory flow of 18 L/min (95% CI, 6-29 L/min; P = .004; I(2) = 82%), and an increased mean standardized asthma symptom score of 0.43 SDs (95% CI, 0.28-0.58 SDs; P < .001; I(2) = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with well-controlled asthma who stop regular use of low-dose ICSs have an increased risk of an asthma exacerbation compared with those who continue ICSs.

Body mass index and response to asthma therapy: fluticasone propionate/salmeterol versus montelukast

We studied the relationship between body mass index (BMI) on responses to asthma therapy using a retrospective analysis of four previously reported clinical trials. Fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol via Diskus 100/50 microg twice daily and montelukast (MON) 10 mg daily were compared. BMI was classified as underweight (less than 20 kg/m(2)), normal (20-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m(2)), obese-1 (30-34.9 kg/m(2)), obese-2 (35-39.9 kg/m(2)), or obese-3 (at least 40 kg/m(2)). Outcomes assessed included forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)), asthma symptom score, and albuterol use. FP/salmeterol produced greater improvements compared to MON in each of the asthma outcomes studied over the entire BMI range at the week-12 endpoint, with statistically significant differences noted among normal, overweight, obese-1, and obese-3 subjects. The within-treatment responses to FP/salmeterol across BMI ranges at the week-12 endpoint was statistically significantly greater in normal compared to obese-3 for FEV(1) and albuterol use, and in overweight compared to the obese-3 for each outcome studied. The within-treatment comparisons of MON across BMI ranges were significant for albuterol use in normal and underweight compared to obese-3 at the week-12 endpoint. Compared to subjects with normal BMI, the onset to peak FEV(1) may require longer treatment exposure in the very obese. Treatment responses to FP/salmeterol were consistently greater compared to MON and persisted at higher BMI.

Fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (January 2008), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and risk of bias.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using Review Manager software.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, recruiting 16,160 participants. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.1 to 0.43 litres); morning PEF (between 23 and 46 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.44 and 0.7); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1 and 1.4 puffs/day). High dose FP increased the number of patients who could withdraw from prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/day Peto Odds Ratio 14.07 (95% CI 7.17 to 27.57). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Doses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/day are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.

Impact of inhaled corticosteroid-induced oropharyngeal adverse events: results from a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Oropharyngeal adverse events associated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use can affect adherence; however, these effects have been studied less extensively than those that occur systemically.

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the risk of ICS-induced oral candidiasis, dysphonia, and pharyngitis among currently available therapies and to determine related effects of dose and device.

METHODS

A computerized search in MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2004) and EMBASE (January 1974 to June 2004) was conducted using indexed MedDRA terms for oropharyngeal adverse events. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to determine the rate of ICS-induced adverse events based on dose and device.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies (59 drug arms) were evaluated. Incidence of oral candidiasis (P < or = .001), dysphonia (P < or = .001), and pharyngitis (P < or = .023) increased significantly with dose vs placebo at all dose levels and combined, regardless of device. Overall, the ICS metered-dose inhaler (MDI) device (hydrofluoroalkane formulation, 4 arms; chlorofluorocarbon formulation, 26 arms) was associated with a 5-fold greater risk of oral candidiasis vs MDI placebo (OR, 5.40). In contrast, the ICS dry-powder inhaler (DPI) device had a 3-fold greater risk for oral candidiasis vs DPI placebo (OR, 3.24). A similar trend was observed with regard to dysphonia (ICS MDI: OR, 5.68; ICS DPI: OR, 3.74; both vs. placebo). Both ICS MDI and DPI were associated with an approximately 2-fold greater risk of pharyngitis compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently available inhaled corticosteroids canbe associated with oropharyngeal adverse events. Such events may be reduced by postdose mouth rinsing or use of a spacer.

Evidence-based selection of inhaled corticosteroid for treatment of chronic asthma

Published literature relevant to comparison of various inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) was reviewed. Marked heterogeneity was found in the reported results. The efficacy and side effects of ICSs depend on their formulation, dosing and device used, and the subjects' age, severity of asthma, and inhaler technique. All these factors have not been included uniformly in most study designs. Notwithstanding this limitation, it appears that fluticasone is generally very effective and safe in low-to-medium doses and may be used for most patients. Budesonide is the only Pregnancy Category B ICSs, all others being Category C, and it is available as nebulizer suspension suitable for use in children over 6 months of age. Budesonide, also available as dry powder inhaler, and beclomethasone, available as metered-dose inhaler, are equal in efficacy, and side effects and may be chosen according to the patient's ability to handle the device. Flunisolide causes fewer side effects but is also relatively less effective. Triamcinolone is generally less effective and causes more side effects than most of the other ICSs. Mometasone may be preferred if once-daily dosing is desired. Ciclesonide has been found highly effective in once-daily dose and without side effects even in high doses. Further studies comparing it with other ICSs over longer periods of use will determine its place in treatment of chronic asthma.

Fluticasone versus placebo for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) is a relatively new inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

1. To assess efficacy and safety outcomes in studies that compared FP to placebo for treatment of chronic asthma.2. To explore the presence of a dose-response effect.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (January 2005), reference lists of articles, contacted trialists and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997-2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing FP to placebo in the treatment of chronic asthma. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan 4.2

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-five studies met the inclusion criteria (14,208 participants). Methodological quality was high. In non-oral steroid treated asthmatics with mild and moderate disease FP resulted in improvements from baseline compared with placebo across all dose ranges (100 to 1000 mcg/d) in FEV1 (between 0.13 to 0.45 litres); morning PEF (between 23 and 47 L/min); symptom scores (based on a standardised scale, between 0.5 and 0.85); reduction in rescue beta-2 agonist use (between 1.2 and 2.2 puffs/day). High dose FP increased the number of patients who could withdraw from prednisolone: FP 1000-1500 mcg/day Peto Odds Ratio 14.07 (95% CI 7.17 to 27.57). FP at all doses led to a greater likelihood of sore throat, hoarseness and oral Candidiasis. Twenty-one patients would need to be treated for one extra to develop Candidiasis (FP 500 mcg/day), whilst only three or four patients need to be treated to avoid one extra patient being withdrawn due to lack of efficacy at all doses of FP.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Doses of FP in the range 100-1000 mcg/day are effective. In most patients with mild-moderate asthma improvements with low dose FP are only a little less than those associated with high doses when compared with placebo. High dose FP appears to have worthwhile oral-corticosteroid reducing properties. FP use is accompanied by an increased likelihood of oropharyngeal side effects.

The relationship between health-related quality of life, lung function and daily symptoms in patients with persistent asthma

It is generally believed that there is a direct correlation between asthma control and a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQL). Objective and subjective measures of asthma control are used interchangeably. A retrospective analysis from 8994 patients from 27 randomized, controlled clinical trials with persistent asthma was conducted to determine the degree of association which exists between objective (lung function) and subjective (symptoms, quality of life) measures. Assessments were made via forced expiratory volume in 1-second (FEV1), self-reported symptoms and the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) overall scores. Baseline percent predicted FEV1 was weakly correlated with baseline symptom-free days (SFD) and baseline overall AQLQ scores (r=0.11 and 0.09, respectively; P <0.001). Changes in percent predicted FEV1 correlated weakly with changes in SFD but was more strongly correlated with changes in overall AQLQ scores (r= 0.26 and 0.38, respectively; P <0.001). Additionally, SFD at both baseline and endpoint were moderately correlated with overall AQLQ scores at baseline and endpoint (r=0.36 and 0.44; P <0.001). This study suggests that the impact of asthma on a patients' HRQL is not fully accounted for by objective measures such as lung function. Thus, HRQL data complements rather than duplicates results from traditional, objective assessments of asthma control.

Fluticasone is associated with lower asthma-related costs than leukotriene modifiers in a real-world analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the impact of fluticasone propionate versus three leukotriene modifiers-montelukast, zafirlukast, and zileuton-on the cost of asthma within a managed care organization.

DESIGN

Retrospective quasi-experimental comparison.

SETTING

Managed care organization with approximately 350,000 enrollees.

PATIENTS

Three hundred forty-seven patients with asthma who received at least two prescriptions for either fluticasone or a leukotriene modifier. Patients receiving both fluticasone and a leukotriene modifier were excluded.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Multivariate analysis was used to compare total asthma-related costs between treatment groups. A significant difference in total asthma-related costs was found between patients receiving fluticasone (adjusted mean cost $511) compared with those receiving a leukotriene modifier ($1,092; p=0.0001). Other significant predictors of postindex asthma-related costs were pre-index asthma-related costs, a severity adjustment score, and the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Patients taking a leukotriene modifier obtained more short-acting beta-agonists than patients receiving fluticasone (6.49 +/- 4.05 vs 4.30 +/- 3.41, p < 0.0001). A survival analysis of time to receive any additional controller therapy revealed that patients receiving fluticasone were significantly less likely to receive another controller than were those receiving a leukotriene modifier (p=0.0014).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that fluticasone is associated with lower asthma-related costs than leukotriene modifiers.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate compared with zafirlukast in patients with persistent asthma

To compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate and zafirlukast in patients with relatively stable persistent asthma who were previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids and short-acting beta(2)-agonists.A total of 440 patients (> or =12 years of age) previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids (beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide) and short-acting beta(2)-agonists were included in this randomized double-blind study. After an 8-day run-in period, patients were treated with fluticasone (88 microg) or zafirlukast (20 mg) twice daily for 6 weeks. Outcome measures included pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)], peak expiratory flow [peak flow]), albuterol use, asthma symptoms, withdrawals due to lack of efficacy, and asthma exacerbations. Patients treated with fluticasone (n = 224) experienced greater mean increases in FEV(1) (0.24 L vs. 0.08 L, P <0.001), morning peak flow (30 L/min vs. 6 L/min, P <0.001), and evening peak flow (23 L/min vs. 5 L/min, P <0.001) during the study than did those treated with zafirlukast (n = 216). Fluticasone-treated patients had significantly greater increases in the mean percentages of symptom-free days (22% vs. 8%, P <0.001), rescue-free days (23% vs. 10%, P = 0.002), nights with uninterrupted sleep (<1% vs. -5%, P = 0.006), and fewer asthma exacerbations (1% vs. 6%, P = 0.005). Fewer fluticasone-treated patients were withdrawn due to lack of efficacy (2% vs. 13%, P <0.001).Inhaled fluticasone was more effective than zafirlukast in maintaining or improving asthma control in patients with relatively stable asthma who were switched from low-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

Inhaled corticosteroids plus salmeterol or montelukast: effects on resource utilization and costs

BACKGROUND

Experimental clinical studies have demonstrated that the addition of salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) is superior to the addition of montelukast to ICSs. Observational research from real-world clinical practice is needed to confirm these results.

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to assess, in clinical practice, the comparative impact on health care utilization and cost of 2 dual-controller therapies, ICS + salmeterol and ICS + montelukast.

METHODS

This study involved the use of a 24-month pre/post retrospective design in patients continuously enrolled in any of 14 United HealthCare plans. Outcomes assessed were post-index pharmacy costs, rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations, numbers of filled prescriptions for short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs), total asthma costs, and total health care costs.

RESULTS

Subjects in the ICS + salmeterol group had 35% fewer post-index SABA claims than subjects in the montelukast add-on group (P <or=.05). Subjects using ICS + montelukast were 2.5 times more likely to have an asthma-related hospitalization than subjects using ICS + salmeterol (P <or=.065). Total adjusted asthma costs were 63% higher for the patients receiving ICS + montelukast than for the patients receiving ICS + salmeterol (P <or=.0001). In addition, total health care costs were 25% lower in the ICS + salmeterol group. (P <or=.0004). Additional reductions in hospitalization and emergency department visits were observed when the patients on FP + salmeterol were studied separately.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with the use of montelukast and ICS, the use of salmeterol and ICS was associated with a significant reduction in SABA use, decreased hospital event rates, and significantly lower total asthma care costs.

A novel approach to defining the relationship between lung function and symptom status in asthma

We present a novel approach to estimating functional relationships between forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and asthma-related symptoms on a population-wide basis. We used asthma-related clinical trials that reported estimates of mean lung function (measured as FEV(1) percent predicted) and symptoms (symptom score or percentage of symptom days or nighttime awakenings). Using average baseline values from each study in weighted linear regression analyses, we found a negative association between lung function and symptom score (P < 0.001) and the percentage of nighttime awakenings (P = 0.18), but no association between lung function and symptom days. We also found consistent relationships between the mean changes in lung function and symptoms at follow-up within the studies. Functional relationships between FEV(1) percent predicted and asthma-related symptoms can be useful for inferring the effect on the symptoms of a population associated with overall improvements in lung function.

Cost analysis of the use of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma: a 1-year follow-up

A retrospective cohort using pharmacy and medical claims was analysed to determine whether the differences in efficacy of various inhaled corticosteroids demonstrated in clinical trials lead to differences in costs of care observed in clinical practice. Subjects that had an ICD-9 (493.XX) code for asthma and a new pharmacy claim for inhaled fluticasone propionate 44 mcg (FP), beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), budesonide (BUD) or flunisolide (FLU) were identified and followed for 12 months. Annual asthma care charges (pharmacy and medical) over the 12-month observation period were significantly (P < 0.03) higher in patients treated with BDPTAA, BUD and FLU compared to FP, 24%, 27%, 34% and 45% respectively In addition, patients treated with BDPTAA, and FLU were associated with significantly (P < 0.005) higher total healthcare (asthma + non-asthma) charges compared to patients on FP, 53%, 46% and 39% respectively Asthma care and total healthcare charges remained lower for FP after including FP110 mcg and excluding patients who were extreme cost outliers (+/- 2 SD from the mean) in a univariate sensitivity analysis. This analysis supports recent randomized control trials that FP offers a superior efficacy profile at lower asthma care as well as total healthcare charges compared to other inhaled corticosteroids.

A comparison of short-term treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate and zafirlukast for patients with persistent asthma

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term efficacy and safety of low-dose fluticasone propionate with that of oral zafirlukast therapy for patients previously treated with beta-2-agonists alone, and to evaluate the potential therapeutic benefit of switching from zafirlukast to a low-dose inhaled corticosteroid.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study consisted of a 4-week randomized, double-blind treatment period followed by a 4-week open-label period. Two hundred ninety-four patients > or =12 years old with asthma previously uncontrolled with beta-2-agonists alone were randomly assigned to treatment with low-dose inhaled fluticasone (88 microg twice daily) or oral zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily). After 4 weeks, all patients discontinued their double-blind therapy and received open-label fluticasone (88 microg twice daily). Outcomes included pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, asthma exacerbations, and adverse events.

RESULTS

During the double-blind treatment period, fluticasone patients had significantly greater improvements in morning peak flow (29.3 L/min vs. 18.3 L/min), percentage of symptom-free days (19.8% vs. 11.6%), and daily albuterol use (-1.8 puffs per day vs. -1.1 puffs per day) compared with zafirlukast patients (P < or =0.025, each comparison). During the open-label treatment period, patients switched from zafirlukast to fluticasone experienced additional improvements in morning peak flow (17.2 L/min), evening peak flow (13.6 L/min), and FEV(1) (0.11 liter) and daily albuterol use (-0.9 puffs daily) compared with values obtained at the end of the double-blind treatment period (P < or =0.001, each comparison).

CONCLUSION

Low-dose fluticasone was more effective than zafirlukast in improving pulmonary function and symptoms in patients with persistent asthma. In addition, switching patients from zafirlukast to fluticasone further improved clinical outcomes.

Triamcinolone: new and old indications

Triamcinolone is a commonly used synthetic corticosteroid that has recently been tested in a large clinical trial for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and shown to have some benefits. To our knowledge, there are no reviews of the pharmacotherapy of triamcinolone. This review has a brief overview of the pharmacology of triamcinolone, followed by a discussion of the clinical trials with triamcinolone. Triamcinolone is used in the treatment of respiratory inflammation, rheumatoid arthritis and a variety of other inflammatory conditions.

Pediatric asthma assessment: validation of 2 symptom diaries

Accurate assessment of the value of asthma interventions in pediatric clinical trials is an essential step toward the improvement of the treatment of this disorder in children. Conventional pulmonary function measures can be infeasible and unreliable in younger children, particularly for use in multisite studies. As an alternative or supplemental approach, diary questionnaires completed by the patients or their caregivers may provide valuable data regarding the efficacy of asthma interventions in pediatric clinical trials. These questionnaires, however, have routinely not been validated for use in pediatric populations. Two pediatric diary questionnaires (the child-completed Pediatric Asthma Diary [PAD] and the parent/caregiver-completed Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Diary [PACD]) were designed to evaluate asthma symptoms in children aged 6 to 14 years and 2 to 5 years, respectively. The validity of these diary questionnaires was evaluated in 2 separate prospective studies that included children who were divided into 2 asthma groups: stable (requiring no additional asthma medication) and unstable (requiring either an increase in or the addition of asthma medication). Both scales displayed significant discriminant validity, construct validity, and responsiveness to change in asthma therapy. Only the PACD detected differences between groups in nighttime symptoms, such as awakenings caused by asthma. These validity studies suggest that diary questionnaires such as the PAD and PACD can be valuable as an alternative for the evaluation of interventions in pediatric asthma when pulmonary function testing is inappropriate or as an adjunct to such objective measures.

Advair: combination treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in the treatment of asthma

Several classes of medications are available for the treatment of asthma, and often they must be taken concurrently to achieve asthma control. Based on the understanding of asthma as an inflammatory disease, the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute guidelines provide a stepwise approach to pharmacologic therapy. Corticosteroid therapy, principally inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy, is considered the most effective anti-inflammatory treatment. In cases of moderate-to-severe persistent asthma, the addition of a second long-term control medication to ICS therapy is one recommended treatment option. A combination-product inhaler (Advair, Seretide) was developed to treat both the inflammatory and bronchoconstrictive components of asthma by delivering a dose of the ICS, fluticasone propionate, and a dose of the long-acting beta2-adrenergic (LABA) bronchodilator, salmeterol. The Advair Diskus is available in 3 strengths of fluticasone propionate (100, 250, and 500 microg) and a fixed dose (50 microg) of salmeterol. Combination treatment with both ICS and LABA provides greater asthma control than increasing the ICS dose alone, while at the same time reducing the frequency and perhaps the severity of exacerbations. Furthermore, salmeterol added to ICS therapy provides superior asthma control compared with the addition of leukotriene modifiers or theophylline. The superior control is likely a consequence of the complementary actions of the drugs when taken together, including the activation of the glucocorticoid receptor by salmeterol. By combining anti-inflammatory treatment with a long-acting beta2-agonist in a single inhaler (1 inhalation twice daily), physicians can provide coverage for both the inflammatory and bronchoconstrictive aspects of asthma without introducing any new or unexpected adverse consequences. The most common drug-related adverse events were those known to be attributable to the constituent medications (ICS therapy and/or LABA therapy). Although the benefits of combined ICS plus LABA therapy can be achieved with separate inhalers, the convenience of the combination product may improve patient adherence and may therefore reduce the morbidity of asthma.

Fluticasone propionate versus zafirlukast: effect in patients previously receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy

BACKGROUND

The use of inhaled corticosteroids compared with leukotriene modifying drugs in the treatment of persistent asthma has not been extensively studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of a low dose of fluticasone propionate (FP) and zafirlukast in patients previously maintained on inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

Patients (> or = 12 years old; FEV1 = 60% to 85% of predicted) with persistent asthma who were previously treated with low doses of triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) 400 to 800 microg/day or beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168 to 336 microg/day were randomized to treatment with FP aerosol 88 microg BID (FP, n = 221) or zafirlukast 20 mg BID (n = 216) over 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Treatment with FP significantly increased the mean change at endpoint (the last post-baseline observation) in FEV1 (0.22 L versus 0.03 L, P < .001), morning PEF (17.8 versus 3.1 L/min, P = .004), evening PEF (16.7 versus 2.6 L/min, P = .002), the percentage of symptom-free days (16.2 versus 7.1%, P = .007), and the percentage of rescue-free days (23.4 versus 9.3%, P < .001), and significantly decreased rescue albuterol use (-0.66 puffs/day versus an increase of 0.27 puffs/day, P < .001) and combined symptom scores (-0.13 versus an increase of 0.08, P < .001) compared with zafirlukast. Treatment with FP maintained the percentage of awakening-free nights (-1.0 +/- 1.0); in contrast, treatment with zafirlukast reduced the percentage of awakening-free nights (-9.0 +/- 1.6, P < .001). A clinically meaningful difference (change of > or = 0.5; P < .001) was observed between FP and zafirlukast in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) global score and for each domain score except activity limitation (change of 0.3, P < .001). Significantly more patients in the zafirlukast group experienced an asthma exacerbation (n = 14) compared with FP-treated patients (n = 5, P = .035). Patients in the zafirlukast group were significantly more likely to be withdrawn due to lack of efficacy (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Switching patients from low doses of inhaled corticosteroids to a lower total microgram dose of FP improves pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and quality of life, while switching to the leukotriene receptor antagonist zafirlukast may result in worsening of asthma control. This was indicated by the significant number of zafirlukast-treated patients who were dropped from the study due to lack of efficacy within 6 weeks of discontinuing inhaled corticosteroids.

Fluticasone propionate: a potent inhaled corticosteroid for the treatment of asthma

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a potent inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for the treatment of asthma. It is currently marketed in both the United States (as Flovent) and Europe (as Flixotide). Fluticasone is available in both aerosolised metered dose inhaler (MDI) and dry powder devices, with dosages ranging from 44-500 micrograms/puff. FP has been extensively studied in both children and adults; efficacy has been documented across the entire spectrum of asthma severity, including corticosteroid-dependent disease. Clinical data with FP strongly corroborates the in vitro pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies that FP is at least twice as potent as beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), budesonide (BUD) or triamcinolone acetonide (TAA). Both objective (lung function) and subjective (symptoms, beta-agonist use and quality of life) outcomes are improved with FP treatment. Extensive post-marketing surveillance with FP suggests that it is more cost-effective than BUD and flunisolide (FLU) when analysed by an overall healthcare cost perspective. Most of the benefits arise from decreased hospitalizations, emergency room visits and physician-office visits. Extensive safety data with FP documents no clinically meaningful effects on bone mass, nor impairment of growth velocity in children. Considering the efficacy and safety data along with the ability to optimise patient's asthma therapy using the delivery devices and strengths available, FP has become a leader in the ICS marketplace to date.

Occurrence and risk factors of oral candidiasis treated with oral antifungals in seniors using inhaled steroids

Oral candidiasis (OC) is a frequent side effect of inhaled corticosteroids (iCSTs). This study estimated occurrence and significance of risk factors of OC treated with antifungals in users of iCSTs under conditions of normal use. This retrospective analysis used data drawn from drug insurance plan records in Quebec, Canada. The sample contained 27,000 seniors using anti-asthma medications during 1990. Three years of data (1989-1991) were searched for use of oral antifungals concurrent with exposure to iCSTs. A case-control study examined factors leading to increased probability of first incidence of OC in new users of iCSTs. Three-year occurrence for OC was 7%. Increased risk for a first occurrence of OC was significantly associated with higher doses of iCST, increased length of iCST exposure, use of antibiotics, use of oral steroids, having three or more prescribers, a history of use of both high and low strengths of iCST, and concurrent use of oral steroids and diabetes medications. The occurrence of OC is relatively high. Knowledge of factors leading to increased risk could facilitate the targetting of patients who need timely intervention, under conditions of normal use.

Comparison of once- and twice-daily dosing of fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms per day administered by diskus device in patients with asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

There are limited published data regarding the efficacy of once- versus twice-daily administration of flutica-sone propionate.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of fluticasone propionate powder 200 microg/d administered as a once- or twice-daily dosage regimen in patients who were currently being treated with bronchodilators only (BD patients) and in patients who required inhaled corticosteroids for maintenance treatment of asthma (ICS patients).

METHODS

Five hundred seventy patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the following inhaled treatments through the Diskus device (Glaxo Wellcome, Research Triangle Park, NC) for 12 weeks: fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily (FP100BID) or 200 microg once daily (FP200QD) or placebo.

RESULTS

BD patients treated with FP100BID, FP200QD, and placebo had mean increases in FEV(1) from baseline to end point of 0. 49 L, 0.37 L, and 0.21 L, respectively (P <.001, FP100BID vs placebo; P =.05, FP200QD vs placebo). ICS patients treated with FP100BID and FP200QD had mean increases in FEV(1) of 0.27 L and 0.11 L, respectively, compared with a decrease in FEV(1) of -0.08 L with placebo (P <.001, FP100BID vs placebo; P =.023, FP200QD vs placebo). BD patients treated with FP100BID and FP200QD had mean increases in morning peak expiratory flow from baseline to end point of 31 L/min and 27 L/min, respectively, compared with a 1 L/min increase in patients treated with placebo. ICS patients treated with FP100BID had a mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow (from baseline to end point) of 18 L/min compared with mean decreases of -3 L/min and -12 L/min in the FP200QD and placebo groups, respectively. More patients were withdrawn from placebo (26% and 48%, in BD and ICS patients, respectively) than from fluticasone propionate (7%-9% [BID-QD] and 18%-32% [BID-QD], in BD and ICS patients, respectively) because of failure to meet predetermined asthma stability criteria.

CONCLUSION

The efficacies of FP100BID and FP200QD were comparable with regard to improvement in pulmonary function and asthma stability in BD patients. In ICS patients, asthma control was maintained with FP200QD, whereas FP100BID provided greater improvements in pulmonary function and asthma stability.

Inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma: growing concerns

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are an established treatment for asthma in childhood. Recent data bring to light growing concerns that ICS may have significant effects on growth velocity in children. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently convened a joint meeting to review these data, and to release new class labelling for ICS that notes this potential adverse effect. Additional concerns regarding ICS are also discussed, including other potential adverse effects, difficulty of use, noncompliance, and patient and parental concerns with the safety of ICS. The aim of this article is as follows: to describe the rationale for the use of ICS in children with asthma; to delineate the association of ICS with potential growth suppression in children; to discuss recent FDA class labelling for use of ICS in children; to describe other potential long term effects of ICS in children; and to detail compliance issues in children with asthma treated with ICS.

Fluticasone alone or in combination with salmeterol vs triamcinolone in asthma

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacies of medium-dose fluticasone propionate (FP), medium-dose triamcinolone acetonide (TAA), and combined low-dose FP plus salmeterol (SL).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy, multicenter, 12-week clinical trial.

SETTING

Allergy/respiratory care clinics.

PATIENTS

Six hundred eighty patients with asthma previously uncontrolled with low-dose inhaled corticosteroids.

INTERVENTIONS

FP, 220 microg bid; TAA, 600 microg bid; or FP, 88 microg plus SL, 42 microg bid.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Outcome measures included FEV1, peak expiratory flow (PEF), supplemental albuterol use, nighttime awakenings, asthma symptoms, and physician global assessment. Compared with TAA, 600 microg bid, treatment with FP 220, microg bid, significantly increased FEV1, morning and evening PEF, and percent symptom-free days, and significantly reduced rescue albuterol use, number of nighttime awakenings, and overall asthma symptom scores (p < or = 0.035). Improvements with low-dose FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, were significantly (p < or = 0.004) greater than TAA, 600 microg bid, in all the aforementioned efficacy measures as well as percent of rescue-free days. Combined low-dose FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, also significantly increased FEV1 and percent of rescue-free days, and significantly reduced albuterol use compared with medium-dose FP, 220 microg bid (p < or = 0.018). At endpoint, both FP, 220 microg bid, and FP, 88 microg, plus SL, 42 microg bid, significantly increased FEV1 by 0.48 L and 0.58 L, respectively, compared with 0.34 L with TAA, 600 microg bid.

CONCLUSION

In patients who are symptomatic while taking low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, medium-dose FP (440 microg/d) and combination treatment with low-dose FP (176 microg/d) plus SL (84 microg/d) are both more effective than medium-dose TAA (1200 microg/d) in improving pulmonary function and asthma symptom control.

A comparison of multiple doses of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in subjects with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended for the treatment of persistent asthma. Comparative clinical studies evaluating 2 or more doses of these agents are few.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of fluticasone propionate (88 micrograms twice daily and 220 micrograms twice daily) with 2 doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (168 micrograms twice daily and 336 micrograms twice daily) in subjects with persistent asthma.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-nine subjects participated in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Eligible subjects were using daily inhaled corticosteroids and had an FEV1 of 45% to 80% of predicted value. Clinic visits, including spirometry, were conducted every 1 to 2 weeks. Subjects recorded symptoms, use of albuterol, and peak expiratory flows on daily diary cards.

RESULTS

Fluticasone propionate treatment resulted in significantly (P </=.034) greater improvements in objective pulmonary function parameters than did beclomethasone dipropionate treatment and significantly greater reductions in daily albuterol use (P </=.010) and asthma symptoms (P </=.027). Both low-dose (88 micrograms twice daily) and medium-dose (220 micrograms twice daily) fluticasone propionate significantly increased FEV1 compared with higher doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (P =. 006). Low-dose and medium-dose fluticasone propionate improved FEV1 by 0.31 L (14%) and 0.36 L (15%), respectively, compared with improvements of 0.18 L (8%) and 0.21 L (9%) with low-dose and medium-dose beclomethasone dipropionate. The adverse event profiles were similar for both medications.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate provides greater asthma control at roughly half the dose of beclomethasone dipropionate, with a comparable adverse event profile.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate: a review of its therapeutic efficacy at dosages < or = 500 microg/day in adults and adolescents with mild to moderate asthma

Fluticasone propionate is a corticosteroid with comparatively high receptor affinity and topical activity. Inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day provided effective corticosteroid maintenance treatment in patients with mild to moderate asthma in randomised, controlled clinical studies of 4 to 24 weeks in duration. Dosages of 50 to 250 microg twice daily produced consistent improvement in spirometric measures of lung function, reduced the frequency of as-needed beta2-agonist bronchodilator use, asthma symptom scores and night-time wakenings, and prevented asthma exacerbations compared with placebo. Fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily provided significantly greater improvements in lung function than nedocromil 4 mg 4 times daily, theophylline (5 to 15 mg/L) or zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily. Health-related quality of life improved significantly with fluticasone propionate 88 microg twice daily, but not zafirlukast 20 mg twice daily or placebo. In comparative trials in which fluticasone propionate was given at half the dosage of beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide, fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily produced equivalent or greater improvement in spirometric parameters and equivalent reductions in the use of as-needed beta2-agonists than beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide. Fluticasone propionate 250 microg twice daily was generally more effective than triamcinolone acetonide 200 microg 4 times daily in two 24-week trials. The combination of inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =250 plus salmeterol < or =50 microg twice daily allowed for the use of lower dosages of the inhaled corticosteroid. The incidence of adverse events in patients receiving inhaled fluticasone propionate 50 to 250 microg twice daily was similar to that in beclomethasone dipropionate 168 to 500 microg twice daily and budesonide 100 to 600 microg twice daily recipients and greater than that in recipients of triamcinolone acetonide 200 microg 4 times daily in comparative trials. The incidence of oral candidiasis was < or =8% in patients treated with fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily or other agents. There was no evidence of clinically significant hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis suppression with fluticasone propionate < or =250 microg twice daily in comparative trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day is an effective antiinflammatory therapy for mild to moderate asthma in adolescents and adults. The drug is more effective than nedocromil, theophylline or zafirlukast and is at least as effective as other inhaled corticosteroids administered at twice the fluticasone propionate dosage. The addition of inhaled salmeterol allows the use of lower maintenance dosages of fluticasone propionate. The drug is well tolerated and there is no evidence of a clinically significant effect of this dosage on HPA axis function. Hence, fluticasone propionate < or =500 microg/day is a particularly suitable agent for patients with mild to moderate asthma.

A pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic approach to predict the cumulative cortisol suppression of inhaled corticosteroids

The suppression of endogenous cortisol release is one of the major systemic side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of asthma. The circadian rhythm of the endogenous cortisol release and the resulting plasma concentrations as well as the release suppression during corticosteroid therapy could previously be described with an integrated PK/PD model. Based on this model, a PK/PD approach was developed to quantify and predict the cumulative cortisol suppression (CCS) as a surrogate marker for the systemic activity of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. The presented method was applied to predict CCS after single doses and during short-term multiple dosing of the inhaled corticosteroids flunisolide (FLU), fluticasone propionate (FP), and triamcinolone acetonide (TCA), and after oral methylprednisolone as systemic reference therapy. Drug-specific PK and PD parameters were obtained from previous single-dose studies and extrapolated to the multiple-dose situation. For single dosing, a similar CCS within the range of 16-21% was predicted for FP 250 micrograms, FLU 500 micrograms, and TCA 1000 micrograms. For multiple dosing, a respective CCS of 28-33% was calculated for FLU 500 micrograms bid, FP 250 micrograms, bid, and TCA 1000 micrograms bid. Higher cortisol suppression compared to these single and multiple dosing regimens of the inhaled corticosteroids was predicted after oral doses of only 1 mg and 2 mg methylprednisolone, respectively. The predictive power of the approach was evaluated by comparing the PK/PD-based simulations with data reported previously in clinical studies. The predicted CCS values were in good correlation with the clinically observed results. Hence, the presented PK/PD approach allows valid predictions of CCS for single and short-term multiple dosing of inhaled corticosteroids and facilitates comparisons between different dosing regimens and steroids.

Effects of fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, prednisone, and placebo on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis

BACKGROUND

Many clinicians are reluctant to prescribe inhaled corticosteroids because of concerns over potential effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the adrenal responses to 6-hour cosyntropin infusion after treatment with fluticasone propionate aerosol, triamcinolone acetonide aerosol, prednisone, and placebo for 4 weeks, a sufficient time interval to assess any effects on the adrenal response to stress.

METHODS

This double-blind, triple-dummy, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in 128 patients to evaluate adrenal response to 6-hour cosyntropin infusion (a clinically relevant method for evaluating adrenal function) after 28 days of treatment with fluticasone propionate aerosol 88 microg or 220 microg twice daily, triamcinolone acetonide aerosol 200 microg 4 times daily or 400 microg twice daily, prednisone 10 mg once daily, and placebo.

RESULTS

After 28 days of treatment, mean plasma cortisol response to cosyntropin over 12 hours after initiation of the 6-hour infusion was similar among fluticasone, triamcinolone, and placebo groups; cortisol response was significantly (P <.05) reduced after treatment with prednisone compared with the other treatment groups. Mean 8-hour area under the plasma cortisol concentration-time curves and peak plasma cortisol concentrations were significantly (P </=.003) lower with prednisone than any other treatment; no significant differences were noted between placebo and either of the fluticasone groups in any assessment. Mean reductions from baseline in area under the plasma cortisol concentration time curves and peak cortisol concentrations were significantly (P <.05) greater with triamcinolone 400 microg twice daily compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that fluticasone propionate at therapeutic doses has effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis comparable to that of placebo and has significantly less effect than prednisone as measured by 6-hour cosyntropin infusion after 28 days of treatment.

Fluticasone propionate powder: oral corticosteroid-sparing effect and improved lung function and quality of life in patients with severe chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

Many patients with severe asthma are dependent on oral corticosteroids for maintenance control of their disease. Treatments that allow patients to be weaned off oral corticosteroids may help to minimize the risk of side effects associated with their chronic use.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated whether inhaled fluticasone propionate powder could maintain pulmonary function while reducing the dose of oral prednisone in patients with chronic, severe asthma.

METHODS

Oral prednisone-dependent (5 to 40 mg/day) adolescents and adults with asthma (n = 111; mean FEV1 = 61% of predicted value) were randomized to placebo or twice daily fluticasone propionate 500 or 1000 microg administered by means of a multidose powder inhaler for 16 weeks in a double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients underwent controlled prednisone reduction on the basis of predetermined asthma stability criteria.

RESULTS

Oral prednisone was eliminated by 75% and 89% of patients in the twice daily 500 and 1000 microg fluticasone propionate groups, respectively, versus 9% of the placebo group (P <.001). FEV1, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, and nighttime awakenings improved with fluticasone propionate treatment, achieving statistical significance (P </=.009) primarily in the 1000 microg twice daily group. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression observed at baseline improved when patients were weaned off oral prednisone to fluticasone propionate. Adverse events ascribed to drug treatment were primarily topical effects of inhaled corticosteroids or those associated with prednisone withdrawal. Patient quality of life assessed by means of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire was clinically and significantly improved after fluticasone propionate treatment (P </=.003).

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate powder (500 or 1000 microg twice daily) effectively improved lung function, adrenal function, and asthma-specific quality of life in patients with severe chronic asthma previously treated with oral prednisone while allowing most patients to be weaned off oral corticosteroid therapy.

Effects of the inhaled corticosteroids fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide and oral prednisone on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in adult patients with asthma

Two multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies were conducted in adult patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma to assess the effects of 4 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function. The first study compared fluticasone propionate 100 and 500 microg twice daily, triamcinolone acetonide 300 and 500 microg twice daily, oral prednisone 10 mg every morning, and placebo. The second study compared fluticasone propionate 100 and 250 microg twice daily, flunisolide 500 microg twice daily, and placebo. Therapeutic doses of fluticasone propionate, triamcinolone acetonide, and flunisolide were found to be comparable to each other and to placebo in their lack of adrenal suppressive effects, based on mean plasma cortisol responses to 6-hour cosyntropin infusion. Prednisone produced significantly greater suppression of HPA-axis function than did any of the inhaled corticosteroids or placebo (P<0.001). Mean reductions from baseline in 8-hour area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and 8-hour peak plasma cortisol concentrations and the mean percentage of change from baseline in 8-hour AUC were significantly greater after treatment with triamcinolone acetonide 500 microg twice daily compared with placebo (P< or =0.042). These findings indicate that fluticasone propionate has no greater systemic effect than either triamcinolone acetonide or flunisolide at doses appropriate for patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

Establishing a therapeutic index for the inhaled corticosteroids: part I. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison of the inhaled corticosteroids

The inhaled corticosteroids contain physicochemical differences that alter both glucocorticoid receptor-binding characteristics and the pharmacokinetic variables of these drugs. Differences in receptor-binding affinity translate into differences in potency for different drugs. Differences in pharmacokinetics, however, determine the topical effect to systemic effect ratio, or the "pulmonary targeting" of the drug. Beneficial pharmacokinetic properties that may improve pulmonary targeting include low oral bioavailability, rapid systemic clearance, and slow absorption from the lung. Delivery devices can produce clinically significant differences in topical activity by altering the dose deposited in the lung and, for orally absorbed drugs, the amount deposited in the oropharynx and swallowed. Clinical trials have confirmed that differences in potency or drug delivery of 2-fold or more can be detected in patients with asthma. However, because of the relatively flat nature of the dose-response curve for morning peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 second, the trials must be adequately powered and well controlled. The use of bronchial provocation measures are problematic because of the prolonged lag time for response. Study design flaws can lead to misinterpretation of results. Clinical studies have indicated the following relative potency differences: fluticasone propionate > budesonide = beclomethasone dipropionate > triamcinolone acetonide = flunisolide. Current evidence suggests that potency differences can be overcome by giving larger doses of the less potent drug. However, because of these potency differences, studies of systemic effects should not be done in isolation of adequate topical activity studies to define the pulmonary targeting of the drugs.

Risk-benefit assessment of fluticasone propionate in the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis

BENEFITS

Fluticasone propionate (FP) is a new topical corticosteroid spray for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. FP has been shown to be effective for the treatment of adult and pediatric asthma, even at rather low doses (25 microg twice daily [b.i.d.]); many studies in asthma have shown clinical efficacy of fluticasone at half the dose of the comparison steroid (such as beclomethasone dipropionate [BDP] or budesonide [BUD]). However, exact dose comparisons cannot be made because dose-ranging comparison studies have not been done. Studies in allergic rhinitis in children and adults have shown good efficacy in FP-treated patients at a dose of 200 microg once daily (o.d.), intranasally. In summary, FP is effective in both asthma and allergic rhinitis.

RISKS

FP has minimal systemic activity because the portion of drug that is swallowed is not absorbed from the gut. Thus, the amount available for systemic activity is only that which is absorbed through the nasal mucosa (in the treatment of rhinitis) or through the alveoli of the lungs (in the treatment of asthma). When laboratory assays of adrenal function or bone formation are measured, FP and other inhaled corticosteroids can be shown to cause suppression of these markers, especially at high doses. There have been no consistent reports of clinical adrenal suppression or osteoporosis caused by FP. In summary, the risk-benefit ratio of FP at the usual doses (therapeutic ratio) is very favorable. High doses may show evidence of suppression of the hypothalamic pituitary axis as measured by in vitro tests, but evidence of corresponding clinical adverse effects is lacking.