Adequação calórico-proteica da terapia nutricional enteral em pacientes cirúrgicos

Validity of the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria using calf circumference in the prediction of in-hospital mortality in older surgical patients: A secondary analysis of a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is a prevalent condition among older patients and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Methods such as the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), the Mini Nutritional Assessment Long Form (MNA-LF), and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) diagnose malnutrition early. This study aimed to evaluate the performance and validity of these instruments to predict the length of hospital stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality in older surgical patients.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was performed in hospitalized older surgical patients. In the first 48 h of admission, general data were collected, and patients were evaluated by SGA, MNA-LF, and GLIM using calf circumference (CC) and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) as phenotypic criteria for nutrition diagnoses. Accuracy tests and regression analysis adjusted for sex, type of surgery, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index adjusted for age were performed to assess the criterion validity of instruments to predict LOS and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 214 patients (age 75.4 ± 6.6 years, 57.3% men, and 71.1% admitted to elective surgery) were evaluated. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 39.7% (SGA), 63% (MNA-LF), 41.6% (GLIMCC ), and 32.1% (GLIMMUAC ) of patients. GLIMCC had the best accuracy (AUC = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.63-0.79) and sensitivity (95.8%) to predict in-hospital mortality. In the adjusted analysis, malnutrition, according to SGA, MNA-LF, and GLIMCC , increased the risk of in-hospital mortality by 3.12 (95% CI, 1.08-11.34), 4.51 (95% CI, 1.29-17.61), and 4.83 (95% CI, 1.52-15.22), respectively.

CONCLUSION

GLIMCC had the best performance and satisfactory criterion validity to predict in-hospital mortality in older surgical patients.

Prevention of underfeeding during enteral nutrition after gastrectomy in adult patients with gastric cancer: an evidence utilization project

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition is commonly used in patients with gastric cancer after a partial or full gastrectomy since it is safe to use and nutrient delivery is in line with human physiological characteristics. However, enteral feeding often leads to deficiency, when the actual intake of the patient is lower than the target demand, which seriously affects the recovery of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To implement the best practice for preventing and managing underfeeding during enteral nutrition, and to improve the nutritional status of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

The current study was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System program. Phase one referred to the development of the project, consisting of the generation of the best evidence, mainly based on literature review and discussions within a panel of experts. Phase two was the implementation of the project, including baseline audit, training of enteral nutrition and change of clinical practice. Phase three was a postimplementation reaudit. The intake of enteral nutrition was observed in the first 3 days, and feeding intolerance of enteral nutrition was observed within the first week of enteral nutrition. Data were collected using self-designed questionnaires. The nutritional status of patients was measured using Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) at admission, and 1 week after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients with gastric cancer and 10 registered nurses were enrolled in this study. The compliance rate for all audit criteria increased postimplementation. The feeding rate of enteral nutrition postimplementation was higher than the baseline audit on the third day, 54.29% (±12.01) vs. 42.89% (±10.63), and the incidence of underfeeding was lower (30%, n = 30) than the baseline audit (76.67%, n = 30). Furthermore, the feeding intolerance postimplementation (26.67%, n = 30) was lower than the baseline audit (76.67%, n = 30) within 1 week of enteral nutrition. The PG-SGA scores were not significantly different between the baseline audit and postimplementation on the day of admission, while the scores were lower postimplementation (12.90 ± 1.47) compared with the baseline audit (14.00 ± 1.82).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we performed an audit of the clinical nursing quality, which can guide nurses to accurately identify obstacles to the implementation of enteral nutrition, and standardize the implementation and management process, thereby improving the quality of nursing and the nutritional status of patients.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The evidence-based practice might optimize the enteral nutrition process, enhance the efficacy of enteral nutrition, and improve the nutritional status of patients. Medical staff should develop an individualized nutritional support protocol for patients based on the results of nutritional status assessments.

Decline in tongue pressure during perioperative period in cancer patients without oral feeding

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Systemic muscle wasting during perioperative periods has a major impact on postoperative morbidity. However, data on oropharyngeal muscle weakness after surgery are scarce. We examined whether maximum tongue pressure (MTP) and hand grip strength (HGS) diminished during the perioperative period without and with oral feeding in patients receiving cancer surgery.

METHODS

A total of 258 patients undergoing cancer surgery who had visited a hospital dental clinic were prospectively recruited between October 2015 and February 2016. MTP and HGS were measured on the day before and 4 days after surgery. Data on age, sex, tumor location, surgical procedure, and oral feeding status were obtained from patient medical records. We analyzed for differences in the perioperative changes of MTP and HGS according to surgical procedure, oral feeding, and tumor location using ANOVA.

RESULTS

Neither MTP nor HGS differed significantly among tumor locations before surgery. The proportion of patients with an oral diet at 4 days after surgery was 36.7% and 34.5% for upper GI and colorectum groups versus 89.2% and 86.4% for genitourinary and lung groups, respectively. During the perioperative period, MTP decreased more significantly in patients without oral feeding than in those with oral feeding at 4 days after surgery (P < 0.01). HGS was not affected by postoperative oral feeding status. Both MTP and HGS decreased more significantly in the upper gastrointestinal group than in the genitourinary and lung groups (P < 0.05), except for MTP between upper GI and genitourinary groups (P = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

MTP, but not HGS, diminishes significantly during the perioperative period without oral feeding. As tongue muscle disuse after surgery may adversely impact postoperative oropharyngeal muscle decline, perioperative tongue muscle strengthening exercises may assist in maintaining muscle strength and good oral feeding.