Emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease among recipients of solid-organ transplants

Epidemiology of Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients Treated With Belatacept

BACKGROUND

Belatacept is a costimulatory blocker that can be used to prevent and treat rejection in lung transplant recipients (LuTRs). The epidemiology of infections in belatacept-treated LuTRs has not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of all adult LuTRs who received belatacept as prevention or treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (desensitization) or as part of maintenance immunosuppression from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2022. We assessed the epidemiology of infections that occurred within 12 months following the first belatacept dose.

RESULTS

Fifty-two LuTRs received at least one dose of belatacept as either desensitization (n = 32) or maintenance immunosuppression (n = 20). Among 45 patients who were cytomegalovirus (CMV) donor and/or recipient seropositive, nine (20%) developed CMV infection. Seven (77%) CMV infections occurred despite valganciclovir prophylaxis and four (44%) were associated with antiviral resistance. Three (6%) LuTRs developed Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). Twenty-five (48%) LuTRs developed 43 bacterial infections and five (10%) developed proven or probable invasive fungal disease. Incidence rates of viral, bacterial, and fungal infections were similar between the desensitization and maintenance groups: incidence rate ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.70 (0.32-1.57), 1.31 (0.70-2.46), and 2.82 (0.31-25.2), respectively. Infection/PTLD prompted belatacept discontinuation in eight (15%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first year after belatacept initiation, LuTRs commonly developed CMV infections, EBV+ PTLD, and bacterial infections. Multicenter collaborations are needed to better understand infection risks in LuTRs treated with belatacept.

Management of Cytomegalovirus Infections in the Era of the Novel Antiviral Players, Letermovir and Maribavir

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections may increase morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. Until recently, standard antiviral drugs against CMV were limited to viral DNA polymerase inhibitors (val)ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir with a risk for cross-resistance. These drugs may also cause serious side effects. This narrative review provides an update on new antiviral agents that were approved for the prevention and treatment of CMV infections in transplant recipients. Letermovir was approved in 2017 for CMV prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive adults who received an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Maribavir followed four years later, with an indication in the treatment of adult and pediatric transplant patients with refractory/resistant CMV disease. The target of letermovir is the CMV terminase complex (constituted of pUL56, pUL89 and pUL51 subunits). Letermovir prevents the cleavage of viral DNA and its packaging into capsids. Maribavir is a pUL97 kinase inhibitor, which interferes with the assembly of capsids and the egress of virions from the nucleus. Both drugs have activity against most CMV strains resistant to standard drugs and exhibit favorable safety profiles. However, high-level resistance mutations may arise more rapidly in the UL56 gene under letermovir than low-grade resistance mutations. Some mutations emerging in the UL97 gene under maribavir can be cross-resistant with ganciclovir. Thus, letermovir and maribavir now extend the drug arsenal available for the management of CMV infections and their respective niches are currently defined.

New Treatment Options for Refractory/Resistant CMV Infection

Despite advances in monitoring and treatment, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections remain one of the most common complications after solid organ transplantation (SOT). CMV infection may fail to respond to standard first- and second-line antiviral therapies with or without the presence of antiviral resistance to these therapies. This failure to respond after 14 days of appropriate treatment is referred to as "resistant/refractory CMV." Limited data on refractory CMV without antiviral resistance are available. Reported rates of resistant CMV are up to 18% in SOT recipients treated for CMV. Therapeutic options for treating these infections are limited due to the toxicity of the agent used or transplant-related complications. This is often the challenge with conventional agents such as ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir. Recent introduction of new CMV agents including maribavir and letermovir as well as the use of adoptive T cell therapy may improve the outcome of these difficult-to-treat infections in SOT recipients. In this expert review, we focus on new treatment options for resistant/refractory CMV infection and disease in SOT recipients, with an emphasis on maribavir, letermovir, and adoptive T cell therapy.

Cytomegalovirus in children undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a diagnostic and therapeutic approach to antiviral resistance

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous virus which causes a mild illness in healthy individuals. In immunocompromised individuals, such as children receiving haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, CMV can reactivate, causing serious disease and increasing the risk of death. CMV can be effectively treated with antiviral drugs, but antiviral resistance is an increasingly common complication. Available therapies are associated with adverse effects such as bone marrow suppression and renal impairment, making the choice of appropriate treatment challenging. New agents are emerging and require evaluation in children to establish their role. This review will discuss established and emerging diagnostic tools and treatment options for CMV, including antiviral resistant CMV, in children undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Are We Aware of the Neurological Manifestations of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Immunocompetent Individuals?

BACKGROUND

While cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection usually causes disease in immunosuppressed individuals, it mostly progresses as an asymptomatic infection in healthy adults. However, very rarely, immunocompetent individuals may also suffer from encephalitis and stroke.

METHODS

Nine patients who were admitted to the Neurology Clinic of Abant Izzet Baysal University Faculty of Medicine from 2016 to 2020 who had various neurological symptoms and were diagnosed with CMV infection were retrospectively analyzed. Symptoms, examination findings, laboratory results, radiologic imaging, and treatments were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Although severe infections because of CMV generally occur in newborns and immunosuppressed adults, it is estimated that the disease is more common in immunocompetent adults than known. This may be associated with unrecognized risks, in part because of immune dysfunction or comorbidities such as renal failure or diabetes mellitus. Also, CMV replication in arterial endothelial cells can restrict blood flow, inducing an atherosclerotic environment and causing stroke. Diagnosis is based on clinical suspicion and serology. Ganciclovir is administered for treatment.

CONCLUSION

CMV infection should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with neurological symptoms, even among immunocompetent individuals, because of the high possibility that patients can greatly benefit from antiviral treatment at the early stage.

Are the Patterns of Cytomegalovirus Viral Load Seen After Solid Organ Transplantation Affected by Circadian Rhythm?

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an important opportunistic pathogen after transplantation. Some virological variation in transplant recipients is explained by donor and recipient CMV serostatus, but not all. Circadian variability of herpesviruses has been described, so we investigated the effect of time of day of transplantation on posttransplant CMV viremia.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 1517 patients receiving liver or kidney allografts at a single center from 2002 to 2018. All patients were given preemptive therapy with CMV viremia monitoring after transplantation. Circulatory arrest and reperfusion time of donor organ were categorized into 4 periods. Patients were divided into serostatus groups based on previous CMV infection in donor and recipient. CMV viremia parameters were compared between time categories for each group. Factor analysis of mixed data was used to interrogate this complex data set.

RESULTS

Live-donor transplant recipients were less likely to develop viremia than recipients of deceased-donor organs (48% vs 61%; P < .001). After controlling for this, there was no evidence of time of day of transplantation affecting CMV parameters in any serostatus group, by logistic regression or factor analysis of mixed data.

DISCUSSION

We found no evidence for a circadian effect of transplantation on CMV viremia, but these novel results warrant confirmation by other centers.

Viral infections in lung transplantation

Viral infections account for up to 30% of all infectious complications in lung transplant recipients, remaining a significant cause of morbidity and even mortality. Impact of viral infections is not only due to the direct effects of viral replication, but also to immunologically-mediated lung injury that may lead to acute rejection and chronic lung allograft dysfunction. This has particularly been seen in infections caused by herpesviruses and respiratory viruses. The implementation of universal preventive measures against cytomegalovirus (CMV) and influenza (by means of antiviral prophylaxis and vaccination, respectively) and administration of early antiviral treatment have reduced the burden of these diseases and potentially their role in affecting allograft outcomes. New antivirals against CMV for prophylaxis and for treatment of antiviral-resistant CMV infection are currently being evaluated in transplant recipients, and may continue to improve the management of CMV in lung transplant recipients. However, new therapeutic and preventive strategies are highly needed for other viruses such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) or parainfluenza virus (PIV), including new antivirals and vaccines. This is particularly important in the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, for which several unanswered questions remain, in particular on the best antiviral and immunomodulatory regimen for decreasing mortality specifically in lung transplant recipients. In conclusion, the appropriate management of viral complications after transplantation remain an essential step to continue improving survival and quality of life of lung transplant recipients.

Incidence of refractory cytomegalovirus infection after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease can be almost completely avoided by current infection control procedures. However, CMV reactivation occurs in more than half of patients, and some patients can develop clinically resistant CMV infections. Whether resistance is due to the host's immune status or a viral resistance mutation is challenging to confirm. Therefore, a prospective observational analysis of refractory CMV infection was conducted in 199 consecutive patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at a single institution. Among them, 143 (72%) patients received anti-CMV drugs due to CMV reactivation, and only 17 (8.5%) exhibited refractory CMV infection. These patients had clinically refractory infection. However, viral genome analysis revealed that only one patient exhibited a mutation associated with the anti-CMV drug resistance. Clinical resistance was mainly correlated with host immune factors, and the incidence of resistance caused by gene mutations was low at the early stage after a transplantation.

Management of ganciclovir resistance cytomegalovirus infection with CMV hyperimmune globulin and leflunomide in seven cardiothoracic transplant recipients and literature review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease caused by genetically resistant CMV poses a major challenge in solid organ transplant recipients, and the development of resistance is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Antiviral resistance affects 5%-12% of patients following ganciclovir (GCV) therapy, but is more common in individuals with specific underlying risk factors. These include the CMV D+R- serostatus, type of transplanted organ, dose and duration of (Val)GCV ([V]GCV) prophylaxis, peak viral loads, and the intensity of immunosuppressive therapy. Guideline recommendations for the management of GCV resistance (GanR) in solid organ transplant recipients are based on expert opinion as there is a lack of data from controlled trials. Second-line options to treat GanR include foscarnet (FOS) and cidofovir (CDV), but these drugs are often poorly tolerated due to high rates of toxicity, such as renal dysfunction and neutropenia. Here, we report seven cardiothoracic transplant recipients with GCV resistance CMV infection from our centre treated with CMV immunoglobulin (CMVIG) +/- leflunomide (LEF) and reviewed the literature on the use of these agents in this therapeutic setting.

Inhibiting cytomegalovirus replication through targeting the host electron transport chain

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a near ubiquitous herpesvirus that relies on host cell metabolism for efficient replication. Although it has been shown that HCMV requires functional host cell mitochondria for efficient replication, it is unknown whether mitochondrial targeted pharmacological agents can be repurposed as antivirals. Here we report that treatment with drugs targeting the electron transport chain (ETC) complexes inhibit HCMV replication. Addition of rotenone, oligomycin, antimycin and metformin resulted in decreased HCMV titers in vitro, independent of HCMV strain. This further illustrates the dependence of HCMV replication on functional mitochondria. Metformin, an FDA approved drug, delays HCMV replication kinetics resulting in a reduction of viral titers. Repurposing metformin as an antiviral is advantageous as its safety profile and epidemiological data are well accepted. Our findings provide new insight into the potential for targeting HCMV infection through host cell metabolism and how these pharmacological interventions function.

Early cytomegalovirus DNAemia and antiviral dose adjustment in high vs intermediate risk kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection continues to negatively affect outcomes for solid organ transplant recipients, despite the advent of strategies for preemptive surveillance and prophylaxis. The impact is especially great for CMV seronegative recipients of donor seropositive organs, who typically lack the ability to control CMV infection at the time of transplantation.

METHODS

We reviewed episodes of CMV DNAemia in a modern cohort of kidney transplant recipients over a 3-year period at a high-volume transplant center to investigate the frequency of DNAemia during antiviral prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Despite receipt of antiviral prophylaxis per current guidelines, 75 cases of CMV DNAemia were observed in the first 100 days after transplantation. For high risk patients, median time to DNAemia was 75 days after transplantation, and the majority of patients had experienced dose-reduction of valganciclovir due to renal insufficiency. Review of CMV seropositive intermediate risk patients demonstrated DNAemia occurring earlier after transplantation compared with high risk patients with a median time of 64 days (P = .029). The impact of valganciclovir dose adjustment was less notable in the intermediate risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidelines recommend beginning routine surveillance for CMV after the completion of antiviral prophylaxis. Our findings suggest that closer monitoring may be beneficial, especially for high risk patients at risk for DNAemia. Patients requiring dose adjustment of valganciclovir due to renal insufficiency may be at increased risk for CMV DNAemia. Improved methods for CMV prophylaxis and evaluation of immunologic risk for CMV DNAemia and disease are needed to improve patient outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Choice of Study Populations for Vaccines

The natural history of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is complex. Individuals may experience primary infection, reactivation of latent infection, or reinfection with a new strain despite natural immunity. The ability of this virus to continue to replicate despite substantial immune responses is attributable to the many immune evasion genes encoded within its genome. Given this complex natural history and immunology, the design of clinical trials of CMV vaccines may require components not usually found in trials of vaccines designed to protect against viruses that cause only acute infections. In this article, we focus on specific aspects of clinical trial design that could be adopted to address the complexities of CMV infections. We consider women of childbearing age, toddlers, recipients of solid organ transplantation, and stem cell transplant patients, emphasizing the parallels between women and solid organ transplantation that could allow vaccines to be developed in parallel in both these patient groups. We emphasize the potential for studies of passive immunity to inform the selection of immunogens as candidates for active immunization and vice versa. We also illustrate how application of whole-genomic sequencing could document whether vaccines protect against reactivation or reinfection of CMV or both.

Pathogenesis of human cytomegalovirus in the immunocompromised host

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a herpesvirus that infects ~60% of adults in developed countries and more than 90% in developing countries. Usually, it is controlled by a vigorous immune response so that infections are asymptomatic or symptoms are mild. However, if the immune system is compromised, HCMV can replicate to high levels and cause serious end organ disease. Substantial progress is being made in understanding the natural history and pathogenesis of HCMV infection and disease in the immunocompromised host. Serial measures of viral load defined the dynamics of HCMV replication and are now used routinely to allow intervention with antiviral drugs in individual patients. They are also used as pharmacodynamic read-outs to evaluate prototype vaccines that may protect against HCMV replication and to define immune correlates of this protection. This novel information is informing the design of randomized controlled trials of new antiviral drugs and vaccines currently under evaluation. In this Review, we discuss immune responses to HCMV and countermeasures deployed by the virus, the establishment of latency and reactivation from it, exogenous reinfection with additional strains, pathogenesis, development of end organ disease, indirect effects of infection, immune correlates of control of replication, current treatment strategies and the evaluation of novel vaccine candidates.

Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation

Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.

Cytomegalovirus after kidney transplantation in 2020: moving towards personalized prevention

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-related complications after kidney transplantation remain a substantial challenge. Rather than applying one preventive strategy to all at-risk patients, we can now adapt our strategy at the individual patient level. Antiviral prophylaxis or a strict pre-emptive strategy may be optimal for patients at the highest risk for CMV, while patients at lower risk may benefit particularly from pre-emptive monitoring and the administration of therapy only if needed. CMV-specific T-cell assays may be useful for further refining the pre-transplant determination of CMV risk, and for guiding decisions about antiviral therapy need or duration. An immunosuppressive regimen including a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor reduces CMV risk and may thus be an attractive option in some patients. New antiviral agents may further expand our therapeutic arsenal in the near future, and the prospects of CMV vaccination and adoptive T-cell therapy appear to be on the horizon.

Outcomes of transplant recipients treated with cidofovir for resistant or refractory cytomegalovirus infection

BACKGROUND

Treatment of ganciclovir-resistant (GCV-R)/refractory cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in blood/marrow transplant (BMT) and solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients remains suboptimal. Cidofovir (CDV), a nucleotide analogue with anti-CMV activity, is nephrotoxic and oculotoxic.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of SOT and BMT patients with GCV-R/refractory CMV treated with CDV between 1/1/2008 and 12/31/2017.

DATA COLLECTED

baseline demographics, CMV serostatus, clinical and virologic presentations and outcomes, UL97 and UL54 genotype mutations, drug toxicities, and cause of death. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

16 patients received CDV for treatment of CMV: six BMT and 10 SOT. Seven (47%) of the patients had high-risk donor/recipient serostatus: six (60%) SOT were D+/R-; one (16.7%) BMT was D-/R+. Median time to CMV DNAemia was 131 days post-transplant (IQR, 37.5-230.3). Proven tissue invasive disease was present in three patients (18.8%). Twelve (75%) had genotype testing; 10 (83.3%) of those had antiviral resistance mutations. While on CDV, six (37.5%) developed nephrotoxicity, and four (25%) developed uveitis (two had both uveitis and nephrotoxicity). Eight (50%) had failure to clear CMV DNAemia despite CDV treatment. Eight (50%) of the patients died; median time to death, after initiation of CDV, was 33.5 days [IQR22-988].

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of good therapeutic alternatives, CDV is used in GCV-R/refractory CMV infection. However, it is associated with a substantial risk of toxicity and failure to clear CMV DNAemia, highlighting the need for development of newer and less toxic therapies. The high mortality in this group of patients underscores the severity of illness in this population.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Bayesian Estimation of the Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve for Ganciclovir in Adult Chinese Renal Allograft Recipients After Valganciclovir Administration

Valganciclovir (VGCV) is the prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV). The objective of this study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic model (PPK) of GCV to investigate the PK characteristics of GCV after administration of VGCV in adult Chinese renal allograft recipients. Seventy Chinese renal allograft recipients were given 450 mg (n = 41) or 900 mg (n = 29) VGCV daily. Blood samples were drawn 0-24 hours after 5 days' therapy, and GCV plasma levels were determined. The PPK model was constructed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, and the Bayesian estimation of AUC_0-24h was constructed for an individual patient based on limited plasma samples. The PK of GCV was best described by a 2-compartment model with a first-order absorption process. The CL/F, V₂ /F, Q/F, V₃ /F, K_a , and lag time of GCV were 15.8 ± 0.71 L/h, 10.9 ± 2.38 L, 3.98 ± 0.40 L/h, 167 ± 44.0 L, 0.23 ± 0.0078 1/h, and 0.93 ± 0.017 hours, respectively. Clearance of creatinine was found to have a significant impact on the CL/F of GCV (P < .01). Sampling strategies consisted of plasma concentrations 0 and 2 and 0, 2, and 4 hours after VGCV administration were shown to be suitable for the estimation of the GCV AUC_0-24h . The PPK model was acceptable and can describe the PK of GCV in Chinese renal transplant patients administered VGCV. The AUC_0-24h of GCV in Chinese renal transplant patients can be calculated by a limited sampling strategy method.

Antiviral-resistant cytomegalovirus infections in solid organ transplantation in the Netherlands

Objectives

Antiviral resistance in cytomegalovirus (CMV) may result from mutations in the molecular targets of antiviral agents. The aim of this study was to investigate both the prevalence of resistance-associated mutations and the factors associated with antiviral resistance in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients with repeated high CMV loads during antiviral treatment.

Methods

SOT patients were selected retrospectively, based on CMV loads of >30000 IU/mL at least twice in a period during which treatment was given. Patient samples were tested for antiviral resistance by Sanger sequencing the UL97 and UL54 genes of CMV, which code for the viral kinase and polymerase. Factors predisposing to and resulting from the development of antiviral resistance mutations were analysed.

Results

Multiple samples from 113 SOT patients were tested, showing resistance-associated mutations in 25 patients (22%). A further 20 (18%) patients showed mutations that were not known to be associated with antiviral resistance. Several factors were associated with development of resistance-associated mutations in UL97 as well as UL54, including human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch, which occurred more frequently in the group of patients with resistance mutations. High-level resistance mutations were most frequently seen in UL97.

Conclusions

This study shows that by selecting patients solely on the basis of virological response to treatment, more patients with antiviral resistance mutations are identified. In this study we confirm findings by other groups that primary infections are associated with resistance development. Moreover, we show that HLA mismatch is associated with the development of antiviral resistance, which suggests a role for host immunity in the development of resistance.

Activator protein-1 transactivation of the major immediate early locus is a determinant of cytomegalovirus reactivation from latency

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that latently infects hematopoietic cells and has the ability to reactivate when triggered by immunological stress. This reactivation causes significant morbidity and mortality in immune-deficient patients, who are unable to control viral dissemination. While a competent immune system helps prevent clinically detectable viremia, a portrait of the factors that induce reactivation following the proper cues remains incomplete. Our understanding of the complex molecular mechanisms underlying latency and reactivation continues to evolve. We previously showed the HCMV-encoded G protein-coupled receptor US28 is expressed during latency and facilitates latent infection by attenuating the activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor subunit, c-fos, expression and activity. We now show AP-1 is a critical component for HCMV reactivation. Pharmacological inhibition of c-fos significantly attenuates viral reactivation. In agreement, infection with a virus in which we disrupted the proximal AP-1 binding site in the major immediate early (MIE) enhancer results in inefficient reactivation compared to WT. Concomitantly, AP-1 recruitment to the MIE enhancer is significantly decreased following reactivation of the mutant virus. Furthermore, AP-1 is critical for derepression of MIE-driven transcripts and downstream early and late genes, while immediate early genes from other loci remain unaffected. Our data also reveal MIE transcripts driven from the MIE promoter, the distal promoter, and the internal promoter, iP2, are dependent upon AP-1 recruitment, while iP1-driven transcripts are AP-1-independent. Collectively, our data demonstrate AP-1 binding to and activation of the MIE enhancer is a key molecular process controlling reactivation from latency.

Cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) represents the most common opportunistic infection in liver transplant recipients. CMV infections in post liver transplant patients cause significant morbidity and mortality, directly affecting post-transplant outcomes. This review will provide the framework for the surveillance, diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of CMV in the liver transplant population.

Synthesis and Antiviral Properties of 1-Substituted 3-[ω-(4-Oxoquinazolin-4(3H)-yl)alkyl]uracil Derivatives

A series of uracil derivatives containing a 4-oxoquinazoline fragment bound to the nitrogen atom N3 of the pyrimidine ring by a short methylene bridge was synthesized to search for new antiviral agents. Some compounds in this series are shown to exhibit high inhibitory activity against human cytomegalovirus and the varicella zoster virus in a HEL cell culture.

Maribavir for Refractory or Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infections in Hematopoietic-cell or Solid-organ Transplant Recipients: A Randomized, Dose-ranging, Double-blind, Phase 2 Study

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections that are refractory or resistant (RR) to available antivirals ([val]ganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir) are associated with higher mortality in transplant patients. Maribavir is active against RR CMV strains.

Methods

Hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplant recipients ≥12 years old with RR CMV infections and plasma CMV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ≥1000 copies/mL were randomized (1:1:1) to twice-daily dose-blinded maribavir 400, 800, or 1200 mg for up to 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with confirmed undetectable plasma CMV DNA within 6 weeks of treatment. Safety analyses included the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results

From July 2012 to December 2014, 120 patients were randomized and treated (40 per dose group): 80/120 (67%) patients achieved undetectable CMV DNA within 6 weeks of treatment (95% confidence interval, 57–75%), with rates of 70%, 63%, and 68%, respectively, for maribavir 400, 800, and 1200 mg twice daily. Recurrent on-treatment CMV infections occurred in 25 patients; 13 developed mutations conferring maribavir resistance. Maribavir was discontinued due to adverse events in 41/120 (34%) patients, and 17/41 discontinued due to CMV infections. During the study, 32 (27%) patients died, 4 due to CMV disease. Dysgeusia was the most common TEAE (78/120; 65%) and led to maribavir discontinuation in 1 patient. Absolute neutrophil counts <1000/µL were noted in 12/106 (11%) evaluable patients, with rates similar across doses.

Conclusions

Maribavir ≥400 mg twice daily was active against RR CMV infections in transplant recipients; no new safety signals were identified.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT01611974.

Definitions of Resistant and Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Recipients for Use in Clinical Trials

Despite advances in preventive strategies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. CMV infection may fail to respond to commercially available antiviral therapies, with or without demonstrating genotypic mutation(s) known to be associated with resistance to these therapies. This lack of response has been termed "resistant/refractory CMV" and is a key focus of clinical trials of some investigational antiviral agents. To provide consistent criteria for future clinical trials and outcomes research, the CMV Resistance Working Group of the CMV Drug Development Forum (consisting of scientists, clinicians, regulatory officials, and industry representatives from the United States, Canada, and Europe) has undertaken establishing standardized consensus definitions of "resistant" and "refractory" CMV. These definitions have emerged from the Working Group's review of the available virologic and clinical literature and will be subject to reassessment and modification based on results of future studies.

Study of cytomegalovirus resistance in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most important opportunistic pathogen associated with transplant. The objective of this study was the characterization of CMV resistance mutations in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplant recipients (allo-TPH) and the study of associated factors.

METHODS

A retrospective study of a cohort of allo-TPH recipients with post-transplant CMV reactivations with stable or increasing viral loads (CV), despite adequate antiviral treatment for at least 2weeks. The study of resistance mutations of the UL97 and UL54 genes was carried out by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Refractory CMV infection in our group of allo-TPH patients corresponded with a 21.43% rate of resistant virus infection (3 of 14 patients). All patients with resistance mutations had multiple reactivation episodes (P-value .01). The mutations found were A594V and H520Q in the UL97 gene that confers high-grade resistance to ganciclovir (GCV). One of the 3 cases with antiviral resistance was documented with a low VL (< 1000 copies/ml) and short accumulated GCV treatment (41 days).

CONCLUSION

Most of the failures in the treatment of CMV were possibly due to clinical resistance; the lack of satisfactory response to antiviral treatment is not always accompanied by virological resistance. However, the appearance of resistances can occur early after the start of the treatment and with VL below 1000 copies / ml. The number of episodes of reactivation was higher among patients with virological resistance than those who did not.

Postnatally acquired cytomegalovirus infection in extremely premature infants: how best to manage?

Postnatal cytomegalovirus (pCMV) infection is a common viral infection typically occurring within the first months of life. pCMV refers to postnatal acquisition of CMV rather than postnatal manifestations of antenatal or perinatal acquired CMV. pCMV is usually asymptomatic in term infants, but can cause symptomatic disease in preterm (gestational age <32 weeks) and very low birth weight (<1500 g) infants resulting in sepsis, pneumonia, thrombocytopaenia, neutropaenia, hepatitis, colitis and occasionally death. There are significant uncertainties regarding the management of premature infants with pCMV disease which is in part due to our limited understanding of the natural history of this disease. This review describes the current epidemiology and clinical manifestations of pCMV disease which should alert clinicians to test for CMV and also outlines a strategy to manage the condition.

Global estimate of phenotypic and genotypic ganciclovir resistance in cytomegalovirus infections among HIV and organ transplant patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV), an opportunistic pathogen belonging to Herpesviridae family, is considered as one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality among wide variety of patients, particularly in transplant recipients and HIV positive patients. As this virus can be resistant to treatment, frequency of CMV in patients who receive organ transplantation and people suffering from AIDS was studied between 1980 and 2019. Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Iranian Database were reviewed, and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (V2.0, Biostat) software analyzed all data. Finally, we used Cochran's Q-statistic to encounter heterogeneity between different studies. Meta-analyses indicated, GCV resistance was 14.1% (95% CI 11.2-17.7); however, in patients suffering from AIDS and organ transplantation were 19.5% (95% CI 14.7-25.4) and 11.4% (95% CI 8.1-15.8), respectively. There were increasing rates in the prevalence of GCV resistance in CMV among transplant recipients, and HIV positive patients. Therefore, evaluation of these refractory infections is beneficial.

Characterization of the dynamics of human cytomegalovirus resistance to antiviral drugs by ultra-deep sequencing

Prophylactic or preemptive treatment strategies are required to prevent human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in transplant recipients. However, treatment failure occurs when CMV resistant-associated variants (RAVs) are selected. Although the diversity of CMV is lower than that of RNA viruses, CMV appears to show some genetic instability, with possible minor emerging resistance that may be undetectable by Sanger sequencing. We aimed to examine CMV-resistance mutations over time by ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) and Sanger sequencing in a kidney transplant recipient experiencing CMV infection. This patient showed a transient response to three different antiviral drugs (valganciclovir, foscarnet, and maribavir) and four episodes of CMV resistance over two years. The full-length UL97 (2.3kpb) and partial UL54 (2.4kpb) CMV genes were studied by UDS and Sanger sequencing and linkage mutations calculated to determine RAVs. We detected four major and five minor resistance mutations. Minor resistant variants (2-20%) were detected by UDS, whereas major resistance substitutions (>20%) were identified by both UDS and Sanger method. We detected cross-resistance to three drugs, despite high CMV loads, suggesting that the fitness of the viral mutants was not impaired. In conclusion, CMV showed complex dynamic of resistance under antiviral drug pressure, as described for highly variable viruses. The emergence of successive RAVs constitutes a clinically challenging complication and contributes to the difficulty of therapeutic management of patients.

Analysis of Ganciclovir-Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection Caused by the UL97 Gene Mutation in Codons 460 and 520 in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series

Background

Drug-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has been increasingly recognized. However, there are limited data in pediatric patients. In this study, the prevalence and factors associated with CMV infection with UL97 mutations in pediatric patients treated with ganciclovir but not responding to treatment were evaluated.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted from January 2013 to December 2017. All patients who were suspected of having ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection and had never had ganciclovir prophylaxis were included. Genotypic assay for UL97 mutations in codons 460 and 520 conferring ganciclovir resistance was performed. Factors associated with the presence of UL97 mutations were analyzed.

Results

Of 34 patients included, 10 patients (29.4%) had a genotypically confirmed UL97 mutation. The median age (interquartile range [IQR]) was 3 (0.85–8.68) years. Ganciclovir resistance was tested at a median time (IQR) of 22.5 (14.3–31) days after initiation of ganciclovir. All resistant isolates harbored a UL97 mutation in codon 460. Compared with patients infected with CMV without UL97 mutation, those infected with UL97 mutation strains were younger (median age [IQR], 3.02 [0.85–8.68] vs 10.45 [2.7–16.4] years) and had a higher maximum viral load (median [IQR], 5.06 [4.74–6.05] vs 4.42 [4.03–4.87] copies/mL). Six of 10 (60%) patients were successfully treated with high-dose ganciclovir (7.5 mg/kg twice daily).

Conclusions

UL97 mutation ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection was not uncommon in the pediatric population. Screening for this mutation should be considered in patients experiencing virological worsening while ganciclovir is given, even if patients have not previously received ganciclovir prophylaxis.

Maribavir for Preemptive Treatment of Cytomegalovirus Reactivation

BACKGROUND

Maribavir is a benzimidazole riboside with activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV). The safety and efficacy of maribavir for preemptive treatment of CMV infection in transplant recipients is not known.

METHODS

In a phase 2, open-label, maribavir dose-blinded trial, recipients of hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplants (≥18 years of age, with CMV reactivation [1000 to 100,000 DNA copies per milliliter]) were randomly assigned to receive maribavir at a dose of 400, 800, or 1200 mg twice daily or the standard dose of valganciclovir for no more than 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with a response to treatment, defined as confirmed undetectable CMV DNA in plasma, within 3 weeks and 6 weeks after the start of treatment. The primary safety end point was the incidence of adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 161 patients who underwent randomization, 159 received treatment, and 156 had postbaseline data available - 117 in the maribavir group and 39 in the valganciclovir group. The percentage of patients with postbaseline data available who had a response to treatment within 3 weeks was 62% among those who received maribavir and 56% among those who received valganciclovir. Within 6 weeks, 79% and 67% of patients, respectively, had a response (risk ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.51). The percentages of patients with a response to treatment were similar among the maribavir dose groups. Two patients who had a response to treatment had a recurrence of CMV infection within 6 weeks after starting maribavir at a dose of 800 mg twice daily; T409M resistance mutations in CMV UL97 protein kinase developed in both patients. The incidence of serious adverse events that occurred or worsened during treatment was higher in the maribavir group than in the valganciclovir group (52 of 119 patients [44%] vs. 13 of 40 [32%]). A greater percentage of patients in the maribavir group discontinued the trial medication because of an adverse event (27 of 119 [23%] vs. 5 of 40 [12%]). A higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was reported with maribavir, and a higher incidence of neutropenia was reported with valganciclovir.

CONCLUSIONS

Maribavir at a dose of at least 400 mg twice daily had efficacy similar to that of valganciclovir for clearing CMV viremia among recipients of hematopoietic-cell or solid-organ transplants. A higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events - notably dysgeusia - and a lower incidence of neutropenia were found in the maribavir group. (Funded by ViroPharma/Shire Development; EudraCT number, 2010-024247-32.).

Safety considerations with current and emerging antiviral therapies for cytomegalovirus infection in transplantation

Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a major contributor of morbidity and mortality, and its management is essential for the successful outcome of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Areas covered: This review discusses the safety profiles of currently available and emerging antiviral drugs and the other strategies for HCMV prevention and treatment after transplantation. Expert opinion: Strategies for management of HCMV rely largely on the use of antiviral agents that inhibit viral DNA polymerase (ganciclovir/valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir/brincidofovir) and viral terminase complex (letermovir), with different types and degrees of adverse effects. An investigational agent, maribavir, exerts its anti-CMV effect through UL97 inhibition, and its safety profile is under clinical evaluation. In choosing the antiviral medication to use, it is important to consider these safety profiles in addition to overall efficacy. In addition to antiviral drugs, reduction of immunosuppression is often generally needed in the management of HCMV infection, but with a potential risk of allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease. The use of HCMV-specific or non-specific intravenous immunoglobulins remains debated, while adoptive HCMV-specific T cell therapy remains investigational, and associated with unique set of adverse effects.

National trends in incidence, prevalence and disability-adjusted life years of invasive aspergillosis in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives: We aimed to study the epidemiology, prevalence, incidence, clinical manifestations, underlying diseases, treatments, outcomes, and societal impact through disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of IA in Iran. Methods: A random-effect meta-analytic model was fitted to estimate the prevalence and incidence of IA in Iran. We also calculated DALYs. Results: Out of 79 published studies during the past 25 years from Iran, 23 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 2947 patients were included, of whom 396 (13.4%) patients were diagnosed with IA according to EORTC/MSG and ICU criteria. The main underlying condition for IA was hematologic disorders (39.4%). A. flavus 86 (43%) was the most common isolate. The pooled prevalence and incidence rates were 20.5 (95% CI 12.5 to 29.9) and 4.8 (95% CI 2.3-8.2) per 100,000 population, respectively. Total DALYs was estimated 164.13 per 100,000 population. YLLs constitute the majority of IA burden compared to YLDs (162.80 YLLs/100,000 population vs 1.33 YLDs per 100,000 population). The highest YLL rates were found in people aged 45-49 (62.9 YLLs/100,000 population) and 30-34 years (45.2 YLLs/100,000 population), respectively. Conclusion: This study indicates an increasing burden of IA in Iran, despite the extensive use of prophylaxis, challenging the public health, especially immunocompromised patients.

New Developments in the Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection After Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be one of the most important pathogens that universally affect solid organ and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Lack of effective CMV-specific immunity is the common factor that predisposes to the risk of CMV reactivation and clinical disease after transplantation. Antiviral drugs are the cornerstone for prevention and treatment of CMV infection and disease. Over the years, the CMV DNA polymerase inhibitor, ganciclovir (and valganciclovir), have served as the backbone for management, while foscarnet and cidofovir are reserved for the management of CMV infection that is refractory or resistant to ganciclovir treatment. In this review, we highlight the role of the newly approved drug, letermovir, a viral terminase inhibitor, for CMV prevention after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Advances in immunologic monitoring may allow for an individualized approach to management of CMV after transplantation. Specifically, the potential role of CMV-specific T-cell measurements in guiding the need for the treatment of asymptomatic CMV infection and the duration of treatment of CMV disease is discussed. The role of adoptive immunotherapy, using ex vivo-generated CMV-specific T cells, is highlighted. This article provides a review of novel drugs, tests, and strategies in optimizing our current approaches to prevention and treatment of CMV in transplant recipients.

Risk Factors for Failure of Primary (Val)ganciclovir Prophylaxis Against Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Background

Rates and risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis breakthrough and discontinuation were investigated, given uncertainty regarding optimal dosing for CMV primary (val)ganciclovir prophylaxis after solid organ transplantation (SOT).

Methods

Recipients transplanted from 2012 to 2016 and initiated on primary prophylaxis were followed until 90 days post-transplantation. A (val)ganciclovir prophylaxis score for each patient per day was calculated during the follow-up time (FUT; score of 100 corresponding to manufacturers’ recommended dose for a given estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]). Cox models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for relevant risk factors.

Results

Of 585 SOTs (311 kidney, 117 liver, 106 lung, 51 heart) included, 38/585 (6.5%) experienced prophylaxis breakthrough and 35/585 (6.0%) discontinued prophylaxis for other reasons. CMV IgG donor+/receipient- mismatch (adjusted HR [aHR], 5.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.63 to 10.98; P < 0.001) and increasing % FUT with a prophylaxis score <90 (aHR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.29; P = .01 per 10% longer FUT w/ score <90) were associated with an increased risk of breakthrough. Lung recipients were at a significantly increased risk of premature prophylaxis discontinuation (aHR, 20.2 vs kidney; 95% CI, 3.34 to 121.9; P = .001), mainly due to liver or myelotoxicity.

Conclusions

Recipients of eGFR-adjusted prophylaxis doses below those recommended by manufacturers were at an increased risk of prophylaxis breakthrough, emphasizing the importance of accurate dose adjustment according to the latest eGFR and the need for novel, less toxic agents.

Cytomegalovirus retinitis in children and adolescents with acute leukemia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) may occur after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, little is known about its incidence, strategies for ophthalmic surveillance, and timely implementation of adequate antiviral treatment in pediatric allogeneic HSCT recipients. We provide a retrospective analysis of the epidemiology and clinical features of CMVR in pediatric allogeneic HSCT patients transplanted at our center over a 16-year period. Two patients of this cohort with leukemia are presented. Our analysis is supplemented by a systematic review on pediatric patients with leukemia and CMVR in the setting of allogeneic HSCT. The overall incidence of CMVR in our cohort was 1% (4/338) and 14.2% (3/21) in leukemic patients. In published cases, CMVR occurred at a median of 143 days after transplantation, and, in the majority of patients, was preceded by CMV detection in blood by a median of 93 days. Continued immune suppression following engraftment likely triggers CMVR. Preemptive treatment with ganciclovir as standard is usually successful. Foscarnet is used in case of resistance to ganciclovir or drug-induced granulocytopenia. Overall, CMVR after HSCT in pediatric leukemic patients is rare, but a potentially higher vulnerability of this population for involvement of the eye warrants a standardized ophthalmological examination plan.

Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common opportunistic infections that affect the outcome of solid organ transplantation. This updated guideline from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice provides evidence-based and expert recommendations for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. CMV serology to detect immunoglobulin G remains as the standard method for pretransplant screening of donors and transplant candidates. Antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is highlighted, as a result of variability of CMV nucleic acid testing, even in the contemporary era when calibrators are standardized. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management. Strategies for managing drug-resistant CMV infection are presented. There is an increasing use of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, but their role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts has yet to be demonstrated. Specific issues related to pediatric transplant recipients are discussed.

A Practical Review of Cytomegalovirus in Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a ubiquitous Herpesviridae virus with a wide spectrum of pathology in humans. Host immunity is a major determinant of the clinical manifestation of CMV and can vary widely in the gastroenterology and hepatology practice setting. Immunocompetent patients generally develop a benign, self-limited mononucleosis-like syndrome whereas gastrointestinal tissue-invasive disease is more frequently seen in immunocompromised and inflammatory bowel disease patients. Additionally, liver allograft dysfunction is a significant consequence of CMV infection in liver transplant patients. While polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry techniques allow for the reliable and accurate detection of CMV in the human host, the diagnostic value of different serologic, endoscopic, and histologic tests depends on a variety of factors. Similarly, latent CMV, CMV infection, and CMV disease carry different significance depending on the patient population, and the decision to initiate antiviral therapy can be complex and patient-specific. This review will focus on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of CMV in patient populations relevant to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology-liver transplant recipients, inflammatory bowel disease patients, and otherwise immunocompetent patients.

Anticytomegalovirus Peptides Point to New Insights for CMV Entry Mechanisms and the Limitations of In Vitro Screenings

In the absence of an effective vaccine to prevent HCMV infections, alternative interventions must be developed. Prevention of viral entry into susceptible cells is an attractive alternative strategy. Here we report that heparan sulfate-binding peptides effectively inhibit entry into fibroblasts of in vitro-derived CMVs and partially inhibit in vivo-derived CMVs. This includes the inhibition of urine-derived HCMV (uCMV), which is highly resistant to antibody neutralization. While these antiviral peptides are highly effective at inhibiting cell-free virus, they do not inhibit MCMV cell-to-cell spread. This underscores the need to understand the mechanism of cell-to-cell spread and differences between in vivo-derived versus in vitro-derived CMV entry to effectively prevent CMV’s spread.

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous betaherpesvirus that can cause severe disease following in utero exposure, during primary infection, or latent virus reactivation in immunocompromised populations. These complications lead to a 1- to 2-billion-dollar economic burden, making vaccine development and/or alternative treatments a high priority. Current treatments for HCMV include nucleoside analogues such as ganciclovir (GCV), foscarnet, and cidofovir. Recently, letermovir, a terminase complex inhibitor, was approved for prophylaxis after stem cell transplantation. These treatments have unwanted side effects, and HCMV is becoming resistant to them. Therefore, we sought to develop an alternative treatment that targets a different stage in viral infection. Currently, small antiviral peptides are being investigated as anti-influenza and anti-HIV treatments. We have developed heparan sulfate-binding peptides as tools for preventing CMV infections. These peptides are highly effective at stopping infection of fibroblasts with in vitro-derived HCMV and murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV). However, they do not prevent MCMV infection in vivo. Interestingly, these peptides inhibit infectivity of in vivo-derived CMVs, albeit not as well as tissue culture-grown CMVs. We further demonstrate that this class of heparan sulfate-binding peptides is incapable of inhibiting MCMV cell-to-cell spread, which is independent of heparan sulfate usage. These data indicate that inhibition of CMV infection can be achieved using synthetic polybasic peptides, but cell-to-cell spread and in vivo-grown CMVs require further investigation to design appropriate anti-CMV peptides.

IMPORTANCE In the absence of an effective vaccine to prevent HCMV infections, alternative interventions must be developed. Prevention of viral entry into susceptible cells is an attractive alternative strategy. Here we report that heparan sulfate-binding peptides effectively inhibit entry into fibroblasts of in vitro-derived CMVs and partially inhibit in vivo-derived CMVs. This includes the inhibition of urine-derived HCMV (uCMV), which is highly resistant to antibody neutralization. While these antiviral peptides are highly effective at inhibiting cell-free virus, they do not inhibit MCMV cell-to-cell spread. This underscores the need to understand the mechanism of cell-to-cell spread and differences between in vivo-derived versus in vitro-derived CMV entry to effectively prevent CMV’s spread.

Human cytomegalovirus G protein-coupled receptor US28 promotes latency by attenuating c-fos

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a ubiquitous pathogen that undergoes latency in cells of the hematopoietic compartment, although the mechanisms underlying establishment and maintenance of latency remain elusive. We previously reported that the HCMV-encoded G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) homolog US28 is required for successful latent infection. We now show that US28 protein (pUS28) provided in trans complements the US28Δ lytic phenotype in myeloid cells, suggesting that sustained US28 expression is necessary for long-term latency. Furthermore, expression of pUS28 at the time of infection represses transcription from the major immediate early promoter (MIEP) within 24 h. However, this repression is only maintained in the presence of continual pUS28 expression provided in trans Our data also reveal that pUS28-mediated signaling attenuates both expression and phosphorylation of cellular fos (c-fos), an AP-1 transcription factor subunit, to repress MIEP-driven transcription. AP-1 binds to the MIEP and promotes lytic replication, and in line with this we find that US28Δ infection results in an increase in AP-1 binding to the MIEP, compared with WT latent infection. Pharmacological inhibition of c-fos represses the MIEP during US28Δ infection to levels similar to those we observe during WT latent infection. Together, our data reveal that US28 is required for both establishment and long-term maintenance of HCMV latency, which is modulated, at least in part, by repressing functional AP-1 binding to the MIEP.

Treatment and Prevention of CMV Disease in Transplant Recipients: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

This review summarizes the significant impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection on solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. A discussion of the various CMV prevention and treatment strategies is provided, including a detailed description of each of the available CMV antiviral drugs.

Systematic review of ganciclovir pharmacodynamics during the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in adult solid organ transplant recipients

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) represents the most common infection among recipients of solid organ transplants (SOTs). Previous meta-analysis showed 0.8% of SOT recipients developed CMV disease whilst receiving valganciclovir (ValGCV) prophylaxis. However, the clinical utility of monitoring ganciclovir (GCV) blood concentrations is unclear. We systematically reviewed the association between GCV concentrations during prophylaxis and the incidence of CMV. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies between 1946 and 2018, where GCV pharmacokinetics and incidence of CMV viraemia or disease in SOT were available. Research designs included randomised trials, comparative, prospective cohort, retrospective, or case report studies. Only human adult studies were included, with English language restriction. The 11 studies that met the eligibility criteria included 610 participants receiving GCV or ValGCV prophylaxis. Quality assessment showed 2/4 randomised trials, 4/6 cohort studies, and 1/1 case report were of high quality. Despite dose adjustments for renal impairment, mean GCV exposures for patients were heterogeneous and ranged between 28 and 53.7 μg·h/mL across three randomised trials. The incidence of CMV infection and disease ranged from 0% to 50% and 0% to 3.1%, respectively, with follow up between 3 to 9 months. One study showed statistical power in determining relationship, where GCV exposure at 40 to 50 μg·h/mL in high-risk SOT recipients was associated with a reduced risk of viraemia. Clinical monitoring for GCV exposure can be applied to high-risk SOT recipients during ValGCV prophylaxis; however, further studies are needed to determine the utility of monitoring in all SOT recipients.

Risk Factors for the Development of Cytomegalovirus Resistance in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) resistance is an emerging problem in solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factors are not well defined.

METHODS

Recipients with CMV viremia of solid organ transplants who underwent CMV resistance testing between January 2010 and March 2016 were divided in 2 groups: proven CMV resistance and refractory CMV infection. A third group was added to compare patients with viremia during the study period with patients with no resistance proven or suspected. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with the occurrence of CMV genotypic resistance.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients underwent resistance testing. Eleven (22.45%) developed genotypic mutations. Group 1 vs groups 2 and 3 had higher prednisone (P = .01) and tacrolimus levels (P = .03); did not respond to antivirals (P < .0001); and had a higher rate of fungal infections (P = .03). CMV resistance was less common in liver and kidney vs heart, small bowel, and mutivisceral recipients (P = .0007). There was no difference in duration of antiviral prophylaxis, viremia while on antiviral prophylaxis, rate of end-organ disease, graft loss, and overall survival. Persistent clinical disease and viremia despite antiviral therapy was the most important risk factor for development of CMV resistance.

CONCLUSION

Persistent clinical disease despite antiviral therapy is an important risk factor and may in part be due to a high degree of immunosuppression. Graft loss and survival were not impacted by CMV resistance.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Ganciclovir-Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Background

Ganciclovir-resistant (ganR) cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an emerging and important problem in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Only through direct comparison of ganR- and ganciclovir-sensitive (ganS) CMV infection can risk factors and outcomes attributable specifically to ganciclovir resistance appropriately be determined.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, case-control (1:3) study of SOT recipients with genotypically confirmed ganR-CMV (n = 37) and ganS-CMV infection (n = 109), matched by donor/recipient CMV serostatus, year and organ transplanted, and clinical manifestation. We used χ2 (categorical) and Mann-Whitney (continuous) tests to determine predisposing factors and morbidity attributable to resistance, and Kaplan-Meier plots to analyze survival differences.

Results

The rate of ganR-CMV was 1% (37/3467) overall and 4.1% (32/777) among CMV donor-positive, recipient-negative patients, and was stable over the study period. GanR-CMV was associated with increased prior exposure to ganciclovir (median, 153 vs 91 days, P < .001). Eighteen percent (3/17) of lung transplant recipients with ganR-CMV had received <6 weeks of prior ganciclovir (current guideline-recommended resistance testing threshold), and all non-lung recipients had received ≥90 days (median, 160 [range, 90-284 days]) prior to diagnosis of ganR-CMV. GanR-CMV was associated with higher mortality (11% vs 1%, P = .004), fewer days alive and nonhospitalized (73 vs 81, P = .039), and decreased renal function (42% vs 19%, P = .008) by 3 months after diagnosis.

Conclusions

GanR-CMV is associated with longer prior antiviral duration and higher attributable morbidity and mortality than ganS-CMV. Upcoming revised CMV guidelines should incorporate organ transplant-specific thresholds of prior drug exposure to guide rational ganR-CMV testing in SOT recipients. Improved strategies for prevention and treatment of ganR-CMV are warranted.

Cytomegalovirus resistance in CD34+ -selected hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia after CD34+ -selected hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) often requires prolonged antiviral therapy. We report rates and outcomes of resistant CMV in a contemporary cohort of CD34+ -selected HCT recipients managed preemptively.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 220 consecutive, CMV-seropositive recipients (R+), who received CD34+ -selected HCT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between June 2010 and December 2014. Patients were monitored by quantitative CMV PCR and were treated preemptively. CMV resistance was tested by a genotypic assay.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-one (73%) patients developed CMV viremia and 47 (29% of viremic and 21% of total patients) had CMV resistance testing by one-year from HCT. CMV resistance was confirmed in 19 (12% of viremic and 9% of total) patients and was identified >3 months from HCT in 90% of patients. Twelve patients had mutations in UL97 only; the remaining 7 patients had mutations in UL54 only or UL54 and UL97. By 1 year from HCT, 11 of 19 (58%) patients with mutations had CMV end-organ disease. CMV-related mortality in patients with resistance was 42%.

CONCLUSIONS

Nine percent of CMV R+, CD34+ -selected HCT recipients had resistant CMV by 1 year from HCT. Of 19 patients with resistant CMV, 58% had CMV end-organ disease and 42% died of CMV. Effective strategies for CMV prevention and restoration of CMV immunity are needed for CD34+ -selected HCT.

Maribavir, brincidofovir and letermovir: Efficacy and safety of new antiviral drugs for treating cytomegalovirus infections

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common complication in immunocompromised patients, especially after hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation. Therapeutic antiviral options [(val)ganciclovir, foscarnet, cidofovir] are still limited and can expose to severe toxicities. Moreover, prolonged antiviral drug exposure and ongoing viral replication are key factors in the development of antiviral drug resistance. After many years of few tangible advances in terms of new antiviral drugs, we are now experiencing an exciting period characterized by a series of phase III clinical trials incorporating three novel agents: maribavir, brincidofovir, and letermovir. This article summarizes the current state of the prevention and treatment of CMV infections as well as data of investigational drugs in clinical development.

Epidemiology and Outcome of Ganciclovir-Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection After Solid Organ Transplantation: A Single Transplant Center Experience in Thailand

BACKGROUND

Data on drug-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in solid organ transplantation (SOT) are not often reported from resource-limited settings. We aimed to investigate the epidemiology and outcomes of this infection in SOT recipients at our institution.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted from January 2012 to May 2015. We included all SOT recipients who were suspected for drug-resistant CMV infection. Genotypic assay for UL97 gene mutation was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction. Patients were reviewed for demographic data, clinical presentation, virologic data, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

The population consisted of 18 (12 kidney, 6 liver) SOT recipients with a median age of 20 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1-49); 44% were male. Anti-CMV resistance testing was analyzed at a median time of 23 days (IQR, 14-33) after initiation of anti-CMV therapy with a median CMV load of log 3.79 copies/mL (IQR, 3.37-4.58). During a median period of 2 years (IQR, 1-3), 6 SOT recipients were identified with UL97 gene mutation in codon 460, conferring ganciclovir (GCV) resistance. Patients with UL97 gene mutation had a longer mean duration of CMV DNAemia compared with those without mutation (263 vs 107 days; P = .04). All patients received high-dose GCV. Two patients received foscarnet and cidofovir. Two patients died (non-CMV-related), and 4 patients developed opportunistic infections other than CMV.

CONCLUSIONS

GCV-resistant CMV infection in SOT recipients is an emerging clinical problem in resource-limited country. Those with UL97 mutation CMV infection have prolonged duration of CMV DNAemia. Clinicians should be aware of this condition when caring for SOT recipients.

Infection in Kidney Transplantation

Infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. It has been estimated that 70% of kidney transplant recipients will experience an infection episode within the first 3 years after transplantation (Dharnidharka et al. 2007). After cardiovascular disease, infection is the second leading cause of death in recipients with allograft function (Snyder et al. 2009). The immunosuppressive therapy required to prevent organ rejection places the kidney transplant recipient at increased risk for donor-derived, nosocomial, and community-acquired infections as well as reactivation of latent pathogens. Pretransplant screening, immunizations, and optimal antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis can help to reduce the impact of infection. Awareness of the approach to infection in the transplant recipient including diagnostic and management strategies is essential to optimizing outcomes.