Role of intracoronary brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis?

Use of 'sham' radiotherapy in randomized clinical trials

The objective of this systematic review was to identify quality trials that use sham radiotherapy in their design and review them to determine its potential value. The Cochrane Library, Pubmed and a Reference Search served as data sources. Trials were included if they met a minimum quality score of 3 on a validated assessment instrument (which assesses randomization, control and blinding) and if they compared sham radiotherapy to active treatment. External beam therapy and brachytherapy trials were considered. Twenty-six trials were identified, collectively including 2663 participants in the period of 1970-2004. All the trials studied the value of radiotherapy for treatment or prevention of benign diseases, including multiple sclerosis, coronary artery restenosis, age-related macular degeneration and Graves' ophthalmopathy. There were no trials relating to the use of radiotherapy in the treatment of malignancy. This review showed that it is possible to carry out sham radiotherapy with due regard for ethical concerns, with effective blinding and high levels of patient acceptance. Large sample sizes with multicentre trial designs were achievable. Although the statistical philosophy for using sham radiotherapy in trials is legitimate, it is no longer routinely used.

Radionuclides-hyaluronan-conjugate thromboresistant coatings to prevent in-stent restenosis

Catheter-based brachytherapy is one of the most effective modalities to inhibit hyperplasia following revascularization procedures. Radioactive stents have failed, however, to prevent clinical hyperplasia due to excessive late lumen loss on the edge of the devices. Numerous strategies have been proposed to circumvent the drawbacks of irradiation therapies, such as the use of more appropriate radionuclides or the "hot-end" stents approach. This paper describes versatile radioactive devices obtained by coating plasma functionalized surfaces-stents or catheters-with a hyaluronan (HA)-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA) conjugate (HA-DTPA) complexed with a gamma or beta radionuclide. Yttrium and indium were used as radionuclide models, due to their suitability for endovascular radiotherapy. X-ray photoelectron microscopy and time-of-flight secondary ions mass spectrometry analyses confirmed the successful immobilization of the HA-DTPA conjugate on both the metallic (NiTi) and polymeric (Teflon) plasma functionalized surfaces. HA-DTPA-coated surfaces were significantly more hydrophilic than bare surfaces (39.5 degrees vs. 67 degrees on NiTi substrate and 29 degrees vs. 128 degrees on Teflon substrate). Therapeutic doses of yttrium and indium were easily loaded onto the surfaces and remained stable over 2 weeks with a radionuclide loss of about 6%. The HA-DTPA-coated Teflon surfaces presented significantly less fibrinogen adsorption than uncoated materials in an in vitro flow model. This approach, which combines the hemocompatibility of HA-coated surfaces and the anti-proliferative effects of an appropriate radiotherapy, constitutes a promising methodology to alleviate the restenosis induced by existing devices.

Intravascular brachytherapy: indications and management of adverse events

Intravascular brachytherapy has become the standard of care for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis after repeat angioplasty. More than 5000 patients have been treated as part of various clinical trials. Based on the results of the GAMMA I trial, the START ((90)Sr Treatment of Angiographic Restenosis Trial), and the INHIBIT (INtimal Hyperplasia Inhibition with Beta In-stent restenosis Trial), the Checkmate system using (192)Ir, the Betacath system using (90)Sr/Y, and the Galileo system using (32)P, have been approved for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. With a better understanding and application of radiation oncology concepts to vascular brachytherapy, problems such as edge failure are being overcome. The complication of late thrombosis has also become less significant with the elimination of restenting at the brachytherapy procedure, and the prolonged use of antiplatelet therapy. There are other competing modalities in the early phases of clinical trials. The durability of results, lack of any significant long-term complications and the confirmation of the efficacy in other sites will further consolidate the role of radiation in treating in-stent restenosis.

Pilot trial of oral rapamycin for recalcitrant restenosis

BACKGROUND

Sirolimus-coated stents are a promising new therapy for restenosis. We treated a select group of patients at especially high risk for restenosis with oral sirolimus.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients were treated with an oral sirolimus-loading dose of 6 mg after coronary angioplasty, followed by 2 mg/d for 4 weeks. Serum electrolytes, lipid profile, renal panel, and complete blood cell count were measured at 1, 3, and 5 weeks after drug initiation. Oral sirolimus was prescribed to 22 patients who had a total of 28 lesions and were at high risk for restenosis. Of the 22 study patients, 11 (50%) discontinued oral sirolimus early because of side effects or laboratory abnormalities. Hypertriglyceridemia and leukopenia were the most frequent adverse events, occurring in 3 patients each. All adverse drug effects were reversible after discontinuation. Follow-up was obtained in 100% of patients at a mean of 9.9+/-1.8 months, ranging from 6.5 to 11.8 months. Target lesion revascularization (TLR) occurred in 15 of 28 lesions (53.6%) and 13 of 22 patients (59.1%). There was no difference in TLR for patients receiving a complete course of sirolimus (n=8; 72.7%) compared with patients who terminated treatment prematurely (n=5; 45.5%; P=NS). Clinically driven repeat cardiac catheterization was obtained in 15 (68.2%) patients; restenosis (>50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) was present in 13 (86.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral sirolimus does not appear to provide benefit to patients with recalcitrant restenosis. Adverse drug effects are frequent, underscoring the importance of local drug delivery to achieve high tissue concentrations without systemic adverse drug effects.

Randomized trial of 90Sr/90Y beta-radiation versus placebo control for treatment of in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND

After conventional treatment of in-stent restenosis, the incidence of recurrent clinical restenosis may approach 40%. We report the first multicenter, blinded, and randomized trial of intracoronary radiation with the use of a 90Sr/90Y beta-source for the treatment of in-stent restenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After successful catheter-based treatment of in-stent restenosis, 476 patients were randomly assigned to receive an intracoronary catheter containing either 90Sr/90Y (n=244) or placebo (n=232) sources. The prescribed dose 2 mm from the center of the source was 18.4 Gy for vessels between 2.70 and 3.35 mm in diameter and 23.0 Gy for vessels between 3.36 and 4.0 mm. The primary end point, ie, clinically driven target-vessel revascularization by 8 months, was observed in 56 (26.8%) of the patients assigned to placebo and 39 (17.0%) of the patients assigned to radiation (P=0.015). The incidence of the composite including death, myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization was observed in 60 (28.7%) of the patients assigned to placebo and 44 (19.1%) of the patients assigned to radiation (P=0.024). Binary 8-month angiographic restenosis (> or =50% diameter stenosis) within the entire segment treated with radiation was reduced from 45.2% in the placebo-treated patients to 28.8% in the 90Sr/90Y-treated patients (P=0.001). Stent thromboses occurred in 1 patient assigned to placebo <24 hours after the procedure and in 1 patient assigned to 90Sr/90Y at day 244.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated that beta-radiation using 90Sr/90Y is both safe and effective for preventing recurrence in patients with in-stent restenosis.

Five-year clinical follow-up after intracoronary radiation: results of a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Several clinical trials indicate that intracoronary radiation is safe and effective for treatment of restenotic coronary arteries. We previously reported 6-month and 3-year clinical and angiographic follow-up demonstrating significant decreases in target lesion revascularization (TLR) and angiographic restenosis after gamma radiation of restenotic lesions. The objective of this study was to document the clinical outcome 5 years after treatment of restenotic coronary arteries with catheter-based iridium-192 (192Ir).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A double-blind, randomized trail compared 192Ir to placebo sources in patients with restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Over a 9-month period, 55 patients were enrolled; 26 were randomized to 192Ir and 29 to placebo. At 5-year follow-up, TLR was significantly lower in the 192Ir group (23.1% versus 48.3%; P=0.05). There were 2 TLRs between years 3 and 5 in patients in the 192Ir group and none in patients in the placebo group. The 5-year event-free survival rate (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, or TLR) was greater in 192Ir-treated patients (61.5% versus 34.5%; P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite apparent mitigation of efficacy over time, there remains a significant reduction in TLR at 5 years and an improvement in event-free survival in patients treated with intracoronary 192Ir. The early clinical benefits after intracoronary gamma radiation with 192Ir seem durable at 5-year clinical follow-up.