Sublingual immunotherapy for allergic respiratory disease

Clinical and anti-inflammatory effects of ultra-short preseasonal vaccine to Parietaria in asthma

OBJECTIVE

The ultra-short course preseasonal allergy vaccine, containing the adjuvant monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), is effective in treating allergic symptoms; however, the efficacy in controlling asthmatics symptoms has not been fully demonstrated. We aimed at evaluating whether the ultra-short preseasonal course of immunotherapy contributes to asthma control.

METHODS

Four subcutaneous injections of the active product (Pollinex Quattro) were administered, before the pollen season, to 20 Parietaria-sensitive mild, untreated asthmatics (M/F: 12/8; age: 38 ± 14 years). After the screening visit (visit 1), asthma control was assessed by the Asthma Control Test (ACT) immediately before the first (visit 2) and immediately after the last (visit 5) injections, as well as during the pollen season (visit 6). Bronchial and alveolar exhaled nitric oxide (NO) concentrations were also measured. Nine Parietaria-sensitive mild asthmatics (M/F: 3/6; age: 40 ± 12 years) served as untreated controls.

RESULTS

The ACT remained constant during allergen exposure in specific immunotherapy (SIT)-treated asthmatics (visit 2: 22 ± 3.2; visit 5: 23 ± 2.8; visit 6: 22 ± 3.6; analysis of variance [ANOVA], p = 0.47), whereas it dropped during pollen exposure in controls (visit 2: 20 ± 2.5; visit 5: 21 ± 2.8; visit 6: 16 ± 5.7; ANOVA, p = 0.01). The forced expiratory NO (FENO) values significantly increased during pollen exposure in both groups; however, the alveolar NO concentrations remained stable in SIT-treated asthmatics (p = 0.11), whereas they doubled in controls (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The current findings show that the preseasonal vaccine adjuvated with MPL contributes to the maintenance of control of asthma during the pollen season.

Three-year follow-up of clinical and inflammation parameters in children monosensitized to mites undergoing sub-lingual immunotherapy

Parallel follow-up of clinical and inflammatory markers during sub-lingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is highly beneficial. Twenty-four children (age 4-16) monosensitized to house dust mite were randomized to receive either active or placebo SLIT for 1 yr in a double-blind placebo controlled design (Marcucci et al., Allergy 2003: 58: 657-62). Thereafter, for 2 yr they all received active treatment. Symptom scores for rhinitis, asthma, and drug usage were daily recorded. Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and tryptase in sputum and nasal secretions, serum and nasal mite-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) were recorded before treatment and at 10-12 months intervals. Nasal ECP and nasal tryptase after specific nasal provocation tests were significantly reduced as compared to baseline values (p = 0.0043 and 0.0195, respectively) in the third year of active treatment. None of the other inflammatory parameters was increased. In placebo treated patients all these parameters tended to decrease only after switching to active treatment. Clinical scores did not improve in treated vs. placebo patients in the double-blind placebo-controlled phase of the study. In both cohorts a clinical benefit was observed as intra-group score reduction as compared to baseline. A significant difference was reached in patients treated for 2 yr for rhinitis and asthma (p = 0.0009 and 0.0019, respectively) but not for drug usage and in patients treated for 3 yr for rhinitis, asthma, and drug usage (p = 0.0105, 0.0048, and 0.02, respectively). SLIT in children monosensitized to mites reverted the spontaneous increase in nasal IgE and in local parameters of allergic inflammation. These outcomes were followed by a consolidated clinical improvement in the second and third year of treatment.

Long-term and preventive effects of sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy: a retrospective, multicentric study

There is now an increasing body of evidence to support the practice of allergen-specific sublingual-swallow immunotherapy (SLIT) in the treatment of IgE-mediated respiratory allergies. Recent studies on traditional injection therapy have pointed out that this form of treatment is not only capable to decrease actual allergic symptoms, but may also have long-term clinical and preventive effects and may influence atopy natural history. In the year 2000, our group published a retrospective, multicenter study showing the efficacy and safety of SLIT in a survey of 302 patients. We now carried out a second study on the same patients, with the aim of investigating long-term and preventive effects of SLIT. Beside the well-known safety and efficacy of this treatment (80.8% of patients reported clinical benefits), SLIT proved also to elicit long term clinical effects: over a mean follow-up of 11.6 months after the end of treatment, 80.8% of patients still maintained the previously achieved benefits. During the follow-up period, only 1% of non-asthma patients reported an onset of respiratory symptoms, and only 9.6% of patients undergoing new skin tests showed new sensitizations. All the clinical benefits were strongly linked to the length of treatment: patients with long-lasting benefits were treated for a mean length of 29.1 months, while patients showing a return to pre-SLIT condition were treated for a mean 13.3 months. SLIT can obtain long-term and preventive effects so far attributed to injection immunotherapy.

Sublingual allergen-specific immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis and related pathologies: Efficacy in a paediatric population

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of the sublingual-swallow allergen-specific immunotherapy (SLIT) in a paediatric population suffering from allergic rhinitis and related pathologies. From March 1994 through March 2000, at our ENT Department 4000 children (1800 male and 2200 female), aged 3 to14 years, were examined for recurrent nasal obstruction and nasal polyps. 2400 (60%) of them were allergic and underwent the following investigations: Impedance test, Pure tone audiometry, rhinomanometry, Prick test, RAST, nasal provocation test and paranasal sinus TC without contrast media. Of the allergic group we admitted 288 patients(12%) to a 3 yr SLIT, meeting the following criteria: children aged 5 years or more, mono-sensitised to one allergen and with family cooperation support. After three years of SLIT, we observed complete symptom remission and a marked improvement in instrumental examinations in 80% of these children. The improvement was poor in 8% of patients, while in 12% of the subjects no changes in symptoms and instrumental results were detected. These results are in agreement with previously published studies and confirm that SLIT can be a valid tool for treating allergic upper respiratory tract diseases in children.

Preseasonal local allergoid immunotherapy to grass pollen in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

We assessed the efficacy of preseasonal local allergoid immunotherapy in a group of children with asthma and/or rhinitis and/or rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 24 children allergic to grass pollen to receive local allergoid immunotherapy for 3 months before the pollen season and 24 such patients to receive identically appearing placebo. The immunotherapy consisted of tablets of monomeric allergoid grass pollen allergens held in the mouth until they dissolved and then swallowed. The study was double-blind. Symptoms and medications were scored on diary cards during the pollen season. Nasal eosinophil cationic protein levels were measured by the monoclonal antibodies EG1 and EG2 outside the pollen season and at low and at high pollen concentration during the pollen season.

RESULTS

The active-treatment group had a statistically significant reduction of total symptoms (P<0.05), especially bronchial symptoms (P<0.05), in comparison with the placebo group. Immunotherapy was well tolerated and compliance was good. Nasal levels of EG2 and EG1 increased significantly during the pollen season, but there was no difference between groups. EG2/EG1 increased significantly only in the placebo group during natural allergen exposure (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that this immunotherapy is effective for the treatment of asthma due to grass pollen in children.