Durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

Liposomes-enabled cancer chemoimmunotherapy

Chemoimmunotherapy is an emerging paradigm in the clinic for treating several malignant diseases, such as non-small cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and large B-cell lymphoma. However, the efficacy of this strategy is still restricted by serious adverse events and a high therapeutic termination rate, presumably due to the lack of tumor-targeted distribution of both chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic agents. Targeted drug delivery has the potential to address this issue. Among the most promising nanocarriers in clinical translation, liposomes have drawn great attention in cancer chemoimmunotherapy in recent years. Liposomes-enabled cancer chemoimmunotherapy has made significant progress in clinics, with impressive therapeutic outcomes. This review summarizes the latest preclinical and clinical progress in liposome-enabled cancer chemoimmunotherapy and discusses the challenges and future directions of this field.

Peripheral NK cells identified as the predictor of response in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Although immunotherapy improves outcomes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), the search for biomarkers predicting treatment success is crucial. Natural killer (NK) cells are potential indicators in various cancers, however, their precise role in ES-SCLC prognosis remains unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 33 patients with ES-SCLC treated with first-line immuno-chemotherapy were enrolled. The peripheral NK cell percentage and its longitudinal dynamics were analyzed using flow cytometry. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated as hazard ratio (HR) and compared statistically.

RESULTS

The median PFS was better in the group with normal baseline NK cell levels than the low group (7.0 vs. 4.6 months; HR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.07-0.41; P < 0.0001), but there was no association with OS (14.9 vs. 10.3 months; HR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.23-1.31; P = 0.171). Furthermore, the NK cell% for 95.0% of patients increased after immunochemotherapy in the clinical response group (P = 0.0047), which led to a better median PFS (6.3 vs. 2.1 months; HR = 0.23; 95% CI 0.05-0.98; P < 0.0001) and OS (14.9 vs. 5.9 months; HR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-1.02; P < 0.0001). Similar trends were observed with NK cell% changes up to disease progression, improving PFS (6.5 vs. 4.3; HR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.12-0.92; P = 0.0049) and OS (17.4 vs. 9.7; HR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.17-1.02; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ES-SCLC, the percentage and changes in peripheral NK cells can predict the response to combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Treatment-related Adverse Events, Including Fatal Toxicities, in Patients With Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Programmed Cell Death 1/Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The safety profile of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors when associated with chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer is still not fully unraveled.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive searrch of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials that investigated the addition of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors to standard investigator choice chemotherapy. We used risk -ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all endpoints.

RESULTS

Six studies and 2,995 patients were included. At the baseline, the median age of the patients varied from 62 to 65 years, 311 (10.4%) had brain metastases, and 1,060 (35.4%) had liver metastases. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were found to reduce fatal toxicities-related mortality (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.80-0.91; p < 0.001; I2 = 49%). The intervention group had a higher incidence of decreased appetite (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.02-1.40; p = 0.03; I2 = 0%), hyponatremia (RR: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.08-2.12; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%), and hypothyroidism (RR: 3.14; 95% CI: 1.10-8.95; p = 0.03; I2 = 81%) of any grade. Regarding adverse events of grade 3-4, there was no association of the addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with an increased occurrence of any of the evaluated outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the incorporation of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy demonstrated an excellent safety profile and to be a promising prospect for reshaping the established treatment paradigms for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Real-life nationwide characteristics and outcomes of small cell lung cancer over the last 20 years: Impact of immunotherapy on overall survival in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

The KBP studies are real-life nationwide, prospective, multicenter cohort studies of patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer that have been conducted in French non-academic public hospitals each decade since 2000.

METHODS

Patients were analyzed in three prospective cohorts using the same methodology. In this study, we describe and compare the characteristics and outcomes of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with a focus on treatments in the 2020 cohort.

FINDINGS

8999 patients with lung cancer were included in the 2020 cohort, of whom 1137 had SCLC. From 2000 to 2010 and 2020, the proportion of patients with SCLC decreased from 16.4 % to 13.5 % and 12.6 % respectively. Between 2000 and 2020, the proportion of women increased from 15.5 % to 35.7 %. 15.4 % of patients with SCLC had limited-stage (LS) disease and 84.6 % of patients had extensive-stage (ES) disease. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate for all patients with SCLC increased from 34.4 % in 2000 to 38.4 % in 2020. For ES-SCLC, multivariate analysis weighted with "entropy balancing" by including age, sex, performance status, number of metastatic sites, and brain metastases indicated an improvement in median OS from 8.1 months in patients receiving chemotherapy only to 11.1 months in patients receiving chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (HR 0.62, p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

The proportion with SCLC has decreased over time, but the proportion of women has increased. The 1-year OS rates have improved over 20 years. The KBP-2020 cohort suggests a benefit of immunotherapy on OS in patients with ES-SCLC in the real-life setting.

Anlotinib plus oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in refractory or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SALTER TRIAL): a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have few treatment options and dismal overall survival (OS) after failed platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

The eligibility criteria of this phase II clinical trial included patients with measurable disease, age of 18 to 75 years, a confirmed diagnosis of disease progression or recurrence after prior platinum-based chemotherapy with a pathologically proven diagnosis of SCLC. Patients were treated with anlotinib at a dosage of 12 mg once daily (QD) and S-1 at 60 mg twice daily (BID) for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment-free interval. After six cycles of the above treatment, patients continued the maintenance therapy using S-1 monotherapy at 60 mg/ BID for 2 weeks, followed by a 1-week treatment-free interval until disease progression.

RESULTS

From March 2019 to June 2020, a total of 71 patients were initially assessed for eligibility in this study. Out of these, 52 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled, and 48 patients received at least two doses of the study drug. The median follow-up time was 25.1 months. The ORR was seen in 21 patients (43.8%). The median PFS was 4.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-5.5 months), and the median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.6-7.3 months). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (16.7%), anemia (14.6%), neutropenia (14.6%), and hypertension (10.4%). No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of anlotinib with oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 demonstrated notable activity in relapsed or refractory SCLC, showing a favorable ORR and an acceptable, manageable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov (NCT03823118) on 3 January 2019.

Surufatinib plus toripalimab combined with etoposide and cisplatin as first-line treatment in advanced small-cell lung cancer patients: a phase Ib/II trial

There is still room for improvement in first-line treatment of advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This trial firstly investigated efficacy and safety of antiangiogenic therapy (surufatinib) (200 mg, qd, po) plus anti-PD-1 treatment (toripalimab) (240 mg, d1, ivdrip) combined with etoposide (100 mg/m², d1-d3, iv, drip) and cisplatin (25 mg/m², d1-d3, ivdrip) for advanced SCLC as first-line treatment, which has been registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT04996771. The four-drug regimen was conducted q3w for 4 cycles with maintenance therapy of surufatinib and toripalimab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety. All of the 38 patients were enrolled for safety analysis, while only 35 patients were enrolled for efficacy analysis since loss of efficacy evaluation in 3 cases after treatment. After a median follow-up of 21.3 months, the ORR was 97.1% (34/35), and the DCR and the tumor shrinkage rate were both 100% (35/35). The median PFS was 6.9 months (95% CI: 4.6 m-9.2 m) and the median OS was 21.1 months (95% CI: 12.1 m-30.1 m). The 12-month, 18-month, and 24-month OS rates were 66.94%, 51.39% and 38.54%. The occurrence rate of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 63.2% (24/38), including neutrophil count decreased (31.6%, 12/38), white blood cell count decreased (23.7%, 9/38) and platelet count decreased (10.5%, 4/38). No unexpected adverse events occurred. This novel four-drug regimen (surufatinib, toripalimab, etoposide plus cisplatin) revealed impressive therapeutic efficacy and tolerable toxicities.

ATR inhibition activates cancer cell cGAS/STING-interferon signaling and promotes antitumor immunity in small-cell lung cancer

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have poor prognosis and typically experience only transient benefits from combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and chemotherapy. Here, we show that inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia and rad3 related (ATR), the primary replication stress response activator, induces DNA damage-mediated micronuclei formation in SCLC models. ATR inhibition in SCLC activates the stimulator of interferon genes (STING)-mediated interferon signaling, recruits T cells, and augments the antitumor immune response of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in mouse models. We demonstrate that combined ATR and PD-L1 inhibition causes improved antitumor response than PD-L1 alone as the second-line treatment in SCLC. This study shows that targeting ATR up-regulates major histocompatibility class I expression in preclinical models and SCLC clinical samples collected from a first-in-class clinical trial of ATR inhibitor, berzosertib, with topotecan in patients with relapsed SCLC. Targeting ATR represents a transformative vulnerability of SCLC and is a complementary strategy to induce STING-interferon signaling-mediated immunogenicity in SCLC.

Perioperative PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (PI) have shown promising results in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, substantial evidence from large-scale studies is still lacking for their use in the perioperative setting (neoadjuvant plus adjuvant). This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the integration of perioperative PI (PPI) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

To identify appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we thoroughly explored six different databases. The primary endpoint was survival, while the secondary measures included pathological responses and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Six RCTs involving 2941 patients were included. The PPI group significantly improved overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62 [0.51, 0.77]), event-free survival (EFS) (HR: 0.57 [0.51, 0.64]), pathological complete response (risk ratio [RR]: 5.81 [4.47, 7.57]), and major pathological response (RR: 2.60 [1.77, 3.82]). Benefits in EFS were seen across all subgroups. OS rates at 12-48 months and EFS rates at 6-48 months were higher in the PPI cohort. Furthermore, the advantages in OS and EFS increased with prolonged survival times. The PPI group also exhibited higher rates of surgery and R0 resections. However, the PPI group experienced more grade 3-5 AEs, serious AEs, and treatment discontinuations due to AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of perioperative PI with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can significantly improve survival and pathological responses for resectable NSCLC. However, the increased incidence of grade 3-5 AEs must be carefully evaluated.

An evaluation of durvalumab across the spectrum of urothelial carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Urothelial carcinoma is a common malignancy affecting the urinary system, with the spectrum of disease encompassing non-muscle invasive, muscle-invasive and metastatic disease. On a background of almost half a century of immunogenic management with BCG, various immune checkpoint inhibitors, including durvalumab, have now demonstrated clinical efficacy in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the available literature on durvalumab in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma for all stages of the disease including mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety and covers a broad portfolio of reported and ongoing trials.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of UC is rapidly evolving, which is reflected in the diverse range of upcoming pivotal trials incorporating durvalumab with additional immunomodulatory agents and therapeutics targeting key oncogenic pathways, each with the potential to change the standard of care. As the complexity of UC management increases, future efforts should be directed at identifying better predictive biomarkers and selecting rational synergistic combinations from the novel treatments available. This will allow the addressing of existing gaps, facilitate the exploitation of new techniques of treatment delivery and ultimately deliver more personalized and efficacious care to the individual patient.

Durvalumab with etoposide and carboplatin for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer and interstitial lung disease: A multicenter, open-label prospective trial

OBJECTIVES

Certain guidelines recommend caution when administering immunotherapy in patients with pre-existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) owing to the high incidence of pneumonitis induced by anti-cancer therapy. A prospective clinical trial assessing the safety of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and pre-existing ILD is warranted. Therefore, this study evaluated the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC and mild idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP).

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective trial, patients with ES-SCLC and pre-existing mild chronic fibrosing IIP were recruited. Mild IIP was defined as the exclusion of poor pulmonary function, a definite usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, and positivity for autoantibodies in blood tests. The patients received durvalumab, etoposide, and carboplatin every three weeks (induction phase), followed by 1,500 mg durvalumab every four weeks (maintenance phase). The primary endpoint was severe pneumonitis-free rate.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included in the analysis. Among them, 13 patients displayed a probable UIP pattern, whereas eight patients exhibited an indeterminate for UIP pattern. Two patients (9.5 %) had pneumonitis of any grade during the induction phase; one had Grade 1 and the other had Grade 5 pneumonitis. No other patient developed pneumonitis during the maintenance phase. The severe pneumonitis-free rate was 95.2 % (95 % confidence interval (CI): 77.3-99.2 %). The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95 % CI: 3.6-6.4 months). Median overall survival was 10.7 months (95 % CI: 6.0 months to not reached).

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoimmunotherapy is a feasible treatment approach for patients with ES-SCLC and mild IIP.

Long-term progression-free survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a spotlight on bevacizumab and its biosimilars

INTRODUCTION

In the era of immunotherapy, bevacizumab seems to be losing its place in NSCLC treatment algorithms. The aim of this work is to try to define the advantages and disadvantages of NSCLC treatment with bevacizumab in combination regimens.

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar to review the most important topics regarding bevacizumab treatment in NSCLC, with or without driver mutations, including trials with checkpoint inhibitors. Special emphasis was placed on the analysis of data on the treatment of patients with CNS metastases.

EXPERT OPINION

Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic compound whose addition to chemotherapy made the first major breakthrough in the treatment of NSCLC. However, for the last 10 years or so, the use of combination immunotherapy regimens has suppressed the use and acquisition of new knowledge about bevacizumab. Newer data are primarily related to the treatment of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with bevacizumab, with only a few larger studies investigating the use of a combination of bevacizumab and checkpoint inhibitors. The basic task remains to define the place of bevacizumab in treatment algorithms.

A biomarker exploration in small-cell lung cancer for brain metastases risk and prophylactic cranial irradiation therapy efficacy

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Limited-stage (LS)-SCLC comprises only one-third of SCLC cases, resulting in limited molecularly targeted therapies and treatment options. Despite advances in thoracic and cranial irradiation leading to improved outcomes, a notable proportion of patients develop brain metastasis (BM), highlighting the importance of identifying high-risk patients for tailored screening and treatment strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed baseline tumor biopsies from 180 LS-SCLC patients who received frontline definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) using a 474-gene pan-cancer panel. The cumulative incidence of BM was calculated with death scored as a competing risk. Independent prognostic factors for BM risk were identified using the Fine-Gray model.

RESULTS

Alterations in the cell cycle pathway, particularly RB1 mutations, were more common in patients with BM, while FLT4 mutations were more frequent in those without BM (P=0.002 and P=0.021, respectively). Significant risk factors for BM include smoking (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 1.73; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.70; P=0.016), RB1 mutations (SHR: 2.19; 95 % CI: 1.27-3.81; P=0.005), and BCL3 amplification (SHR: 2.27; 95 % CI: 1.09-4.71; P=0.028). Conversely, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) (SHR: 0.39; 95 % CI: 0.25-1.60; P<0.001), FLT4 mutations (SHR: 0.26; 95 % CI: 0.07-0.98; P=0.047), and NOTCH pathway alterations (SHR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.43-1.00; P=0.049) were associated with a lower incidence of BM in LS-SCLC. Notably, consolidation PCI therapy did not reduce the BM risk in patients with baseline RB1 mutations, with BM occurrence probabilities of 34.7 % at 20 months and 62.6 % at 40 months.

CONCLUSION

Our study yields valuable insights into the genetic characteristics of LS-SCLC patients with and without BM, aiding the development of personalized treatment strategies. Identifying risk factors associated with the incidence and timing of BM, within the standard regimen of dCRT followed by PCI, may help optimize clinical decision-making for LS-SCLC.

Therapeutic Opportunities for Biomarkers in Metastatic Spine Tumors

For many spine surgeons, patients with metastatic cancer are often present in an emergent situation with rapidly progressive neurological dysfunction. Since the Patchell trial, scoring systems such as NOMS and SINS have emerged to guide the extent of surgical excision and fusion in the context of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Yet, while multidisciplinary decision-making is the gold standard of cancer care, in the middle of the night, when a patient needs spinal surgery, the wealth of chemotherapy data, clinical trials, and other medical advances can feel overwhelming. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the relevant molecular biomarkers and therapies driving patient survival in lung, breast, prostate, and renal cell cancer. We highlight the molecular differences between primary tumors (i.e., the patient's original lung cancer) and the subsequent spinal metastasis. This distinction is crucial, as there are limited data investigating how metastases respond to their primary tumor's targeted molecular therapies. Integrating information from primary and metastatic markers allows for a more comprehensive and personalized approach to cancer treatment.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy in first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: perspectives from the United States and China

BACKGROUND

Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy has shown significant clinical benefits in improving overall survival compared to chemotherapy alone for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus standard chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC from the US payer perspective and the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system.

METHOD

We conducted an economic evaluation using a Markov state-transition model, reflecting the US payer perspective and the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Baseline patient characteristics and essential clinical data were obtained from the RATIONALE-312 trial. The costs and utilities were derived from open-access databases and published literature. The primary outcomes measured included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), incremental net health benefit (INHB), and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). Uncertainties in the model were addressed by probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA).

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, the addition of tislelizumab to chemotherapy provided an incremental gain of 0.16 QALYs at an additional cost of $7430.73, resulting in an ICER of $46,132.33 per QALY. Although above the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of China of $38,042.49 per QALY, the cost-effectiveness was marginal, with an INHB of - 0.03 QALYs and an INMB of $- 1303.06. In the US, despite a slightly higher effectiveness gain of 0.28 QALYs, the increased cost of $45,157.35 resulted in an unfavorable ICER of $163,885.06 per QALY, exceeding the US WTP threshold of $150,000.00. PSA showed probabilities of cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy at 17.18% in China and 40.41% in the US.

CONCLUSION

Tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy was not a cost-effective first-line treatment option for ES-SCLC in China or the US; however, the margin of cost-effectiveness was narrow.

Novel Combinations of Immunotherapies or DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors in Platinum-Refractory Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase II BALTIC Study

PURPOSE

The phase II, multiarm, signal-searching BALTIC study (NCT02937818) assessed novel treatment combinations for platinum-refractory/resistant extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with ES-SCLC with progressive disease during or within 90 days of completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received one of three regimens: durvalumab plus tremelimumab followed by durvalumab monotherapy (arm A), adavosertib plus carboplatin (arm B), or ceralasertib plus olaparib (arm C). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Prespecified exploratory biomarker analyses were conducted in arms A and C.

RESULTS

In arm A (n = 41), arm B (n = 10), and arm C (n = 21), the confirmed objective response rates were 7.3%, 0%, and 4.8%, respectively. Safety profiles in all arms were consistent with those of the individual drugs. In arm A, patients with PD-L1 expression (tumor cells or immune cells) ≥1% seemed to have a greater likelihood of achieving disease control with durvalumab plus tremelimumab than those with PD-L1 (tumor cells and immune cells) <1%, and lower baseline ctDNA and reduction in the on-treatment ctDNA level were both associated with longer overall survival. Among patients treated with ceralasertib plus olaparib in arm C, specific immune response-relevant circulating chemokines and cytokines were identified as early biomarkers of survival and pharmacodynamic biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

In BALTIC, all combination regimens demonstrated tolerable safety profiles, but antitumor activity was limited in refractory/resistant ES-SCLC. Among patients treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab, an association of on-treatment reduction in ctDNA with longer overall survival suggests the potential use of ctDNA as a surrogate of treatment response, warranting further investigation.

Durvalumab after Chemoradiotherapy in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant therapy with durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, may have efficacy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer who do not have disease progression after standard concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients to receive durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg, durvalumab (1500 mg) plus tremelimumab at a dose of 75 mg (four doses only), or placebo every 4 weeks for up to 24 months. Randomization was stratified according to disease stage (I or II vs. III) and receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation (yes vs. no). Results of the first planned interim analysis of the two primary end points of overall survival and progression-free survival (assessed on the basis of blinded independent central review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) with durvalumab as compared with placebo (data cutoff date, January 15, 2024) are reported; results in the durvalumab-tremelimumab group remain blinded.

RESULTS

A total of 264 patients were assigned to the durvalumab group, 200 to the durvalumab-tremelimumab group, and 266 to the placebo group. Durvalumab therapy led to significantly longer overall survival than placebo (median, 55.9 months [95% confidence interval {CI}, 37.3 to not reached] vs. 33.4 months [95% CI, 25.5 to 39.9]; hazard ratio for death, 0.73; 98.321% CI, 0.54 to 0.98; P = 0.01), as well as to significantly longer progression-free survival (median 16.6 months [95% CI, 10.2 to 28.2] vs. 9.2 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.9]; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.76; 97.195% CI, 0.59 to 0.98; P = 0.02). The incidence of adverse events with a maximum grade of 3 or 4 was 24.4% among patients receiving durvalumab and 24.2% among patients receiving placebo; adverse events led to discontinuation in 16.4% and 10.6% of the patients, respectively, and led to death in 2.7% and 1.9%. Pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis with a maximum grade of 3 or 4 occurred in 3.1% of the patients in the durvalumab group and in 2.6% of those in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant therapy with durvalumab led to significantly longer overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo among patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ADRIATIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03703297.).

Advances in predictive biomarkers associated with immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly malignant and poor-prognosis cancer, with most cases diagnosed at the extensive stage (ES). Amidst a landscape marked by limited progress in treatment modalities for ES-SCLC over the past few decades, the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with platinum-based chemotherapy has provided a milestone approach for improving prognosis, emerging as the new standard for initial therapy in ES-SCLC. However, only a minority of SCLC patients can benefit from ICIs, which frequently come with varying degrees of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, it is crucial to investigate predictive biomarkers to screen potential beneficiaries of ICIs, mitigate the risk of side effects, and improve treatment precision. This review summarized potential biomarkers for predicting ICI response in ES-SCLC, with a primary focus on markers sourced from tumor tissue or peripheral blood samples. The former mainly included PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), along with cellular or molecular components related to the tumor microenvironment (TME) and antigen presentation machinery (APM), molecular subtypes of SCLC, and inflammatory gene expression profiles. Circulating biomarkers predominantly comprised circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cytokines, plasma autoantibodies, inflammation-related parameters, and blood TMB. We synthesized and analyzed the research progress of these potential markers. Notably, investigations into PD-L1 expression and TMB have been the most extensive, exhibiting preliminary predictive efficacy in salvage immunotherapy; however, consistent conclusions have yet to be reached across studies. Additionally, novel predictive markers developed based on TME composition, APM, transcriptomic and genomic features provide promising tools for precision immunotherapy. Circulating biomarkers offer the advantages of convenience, non-invasiveness, and a comprehensive reflection of tumor molecular characteristics. They may serve as alternative options for predicting immunotherapy efficacy in SCLC. However, there is a scarcity of studies, and the significant heterogeneity in research findings warrants attention.

Lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) as a prognostic factor in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with first-line chemoimmunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) is a biomarker that combines the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) value and the derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (dNLR). Its prognostic ability has been reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with immunotherapy. In the context of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) with chemoimmunotherapy, its role remains to be determined.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter study of patients with ES-SCLC who received atezolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment was conducted. 101 patients were divided into three groups: LIPI good (n = 33), LIPI intermediate (n = 41), and LIPI poor (n = 27). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), using the log-rank test for comparisons. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were developed to assess the LIPI as an independent predictor of survival.

RESULTS

The good LIPI group had a significantly longer median PFS than the intermediate and poor LIPI groups: 9.6 vs 5.4 vs 5.2 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Significant differences in OS between good, intermediate, and poor LIPI were also observed, with median OS of 23.4 vs 9.8 vs 6.0 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS identified liver metastases and intermediate and poor LIPI as worse prognostic factors (p < 0.050). For OS, a worse prognosis was confirmed in both the intermediate LIPI group (HR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.07-4.41, p = 0.031) and the poor LIPI group (HR: 5.40, 95% CI: 2.64-11.07, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ES-SCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy, an intermediate and poor pretreatment LIPI score was associated with worse PFS and OS prognosis.

BUB1 induces AKT/mTOR pathway activity to promote EMT induction in human small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive tumor. Abnormal expression of BUB1 has been reported in several cancer types, wherein it plays a range of functional roles. This work aimed to elucidate the functional significance and molecular impacts of BUB1 in SCLC. It was found that SCLC cell lines exhibited significant BUB1 upregulation relative to control bronchial cells using data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and verified by immunohistochemical staining. BUB1 was also found to promote the proliferative, migratory, invasive activity of SCLC cells, as shown by CCK-8, 3D migration wound-healing, and Transwell assays, as well as flow cytometry. Additionally, it was found that BUB1 silencing enhanced E-cadherin expression while suppressing N-cadherin, Vimentin, ZEB-1, and Snail levels, as shown by Western immunoblotting. The loss of BUB1 also reduced p-AKT and p-mTOR levels without altering total AKT or mTOR protein levels. In conclusion, BUB1 functions as an oncogenic promoter in SCLC, potentially regulating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition by activation of AKT/mTOR signaling.

Single-cell and spatial proteo-transcriptomic profiling reveals immune infiltration heterogeneity associated with neuroendocrine features in small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive pulmonary neuroendocrine malignancy featured by cold tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), limited benefit from immunotherapy, and poor survival. The spatial heterogeneity of TIME significantly associated with anti-tumor immunity has not been systemically studied in SCLC. We performed ultra-high-plex Digital Spatial Profiling on 132 tissue microarray cores from 44 treatment-naive limited-stage SCLC tumors. Incorporating single-cell RNA-sequencing data from a local cohort and published SCLC data, we established a spatial proteo-transcriptomic landscape covering over 18,000 genes and 60 key immuno-oncology proteins that participate in signaling pathways affecting tumorigenesis, immune regulation, and cancer metabolism across 3 pathologically defined spatial compartments (pan-CK-positive tumor nest; CD45/CD3-positive tumor stroma; para-tumor). Our study depicted the spatial transcriptomic and proteomic TIME architecture of SCLC, indicating clear intra-tumor heterogeneity dictated via canonical neuroendocrine subtyping markers; revealed the enrichment of innate immune cells and functionally impaired B cells in tumor nest and suggested potentially important immunoregulatory roles of monocytes/macrophages. We identified RE1 silencing factor (REST) as a potential biomarker for SCLC associated with low neuroendocrine features, more active anti-tumor immunity, and prolonged survival.

A Phase I/II Study of Valemetostat (DS-3201b), an EZH1/2 Inhibitor, in Combination with Irinotecan in Patients with Recurrent Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has few effective treatments. The EZH2-SLFN11 pathway is a driver of acquired chemoresistance that may be targeted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase I/II trial investigated valemetostat, an EZH1/2 inhibitor, with fixed-dose irinotecan in patients with recurrent SCLC. Phase I primary objectives were to assess safety, tolerability, and a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The phase II primary objective was overall response rate (ORR), with secondary objectives of determining duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Correlative analyses included immunohistochemistry of pretreatment and on-treatment tumor biopsies and pharmacokinetics analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled (phase I, n = 12; phase II, n = 10); one withdrew consent prior to treatment. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in dose-escalation resulted in valemetostat 100 mg orally daily selected as RP2D. Among 21 evaluable patients, the most frequent (≥20%) treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, and rash; three patients discontinued treatment for toxicity. Three of the first 10 patients in phase II experienced DLTs triggering a stopping rule. The ORR was 4/19 or 21% [95% confidence interval (CI), 6%-46%]. The median DoR, PFS, and OS were 4.6 months, 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.3-7.6 months), and 6.6 months (95% CI, 4.3 to not reached), respectively. SLFN11/EZH2 expression and SCLC subtyping markers did not correlate with response, but MHC-I expression did increase with treatment. Two responders demonstrated subtype switching on treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination valemetostat and irinotecan was not tolerated but demonstrated efficacy in recurrent SCLC. Valemetostat, combined with agents without overlapping toxicity, warrants further investigation in SCLC.

18F-FDG-PET/CT Uptake by Noncancerous Lung as a Predictor of Interstitial Lung Disease Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved lung cancer prognosis; however, ICI-related interstitial lung disease (ILD) is fatal and difficult to predict. Herein, we hypothesized that pre-existing lung inflammation on radiological imaging can be a potential risk factor for ILD onset. Therefore, we investigated the association between high uptake in noncancerous lung (NCL) on 18F- FDG-PET/CT and ICI-ILD in lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients with primary lung cancer who underwent FDG-PET/CT within three months prior to ICI therapy were retrospectively included. Artificial intelligence was utilized for extracting the NCL regions (background lung) from the lung contralateral to the primary tumor. FDG uptake by the NCL was assessed via the SUVmax (NCL-SUVmax), SUVmean (NCL-SUVmean), and total glycolytic activity (NCL-TGA)defined as NCL-SUVmean×NCL volume [mL]. NCL-SUVmean and NCL-TGA were calculated using the following four SUV thresholds: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0.

RESULTS

Of the 165 patients, 28 (17.0%) developed ILD. Univariate analysis showed that high values of NCL-SUVmax, NCL-SUVmean2.0 (SUV threshold=2.0), and NCL-TGA1.0 (SUV threshold=1.0) were significantly associated with ILD onset (all p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, tumor FDG uptake, and pre-existing interstitial lung abnormalities revealed that a high NCL-TGA1.0 (≥149.45) was independently associated with ILD onset (odds ratio, 6.588; p = 0.002). Two-year cumulative incidence of ILD was significantly higher in the high NCL-TGA1.0 group than in the low group (58.4% vs. 14.4%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High uptake of NCL on FDG-PET/CT is correlated with ICI-ILD development, which could serve as a risk stratification tool before ICI therapy in primary lung cancer.

The gut microbiome modulate response to immunotherapy in cancer

Gut microbiota have been reported to play an important role in the occurrence and development of malignant tumors. Currently, clinical studies have identified specific gut microbiota and its metabolites associated with efficacy of immunotherapy in multiple types of cancers. Preclinical investigations have elucidated that gut microbiota modulate the antitumor immunity and affect the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Certain microbiota and its metabolites may favorably remodel the tumor microenvironment by engaging innate and/or adaptive immune cells. Understanding how the gut microbiome interacts with cancer immunotherapy opens new avenues for improving treatment strategies. Fecal microbial transplants, probiotics, dietary interventions, and other strategies targeting the microbiota have shown promise in preclinical studies to enhance the immunotherapy. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating these approaches. This review presents the recent advancements in understanding the dynamic interplay among the host immunity, the microbiome, and cancer immunotherapy, as well as strategies for modulating the microbiome, with a view to translating into clinical applications.

Clinical potential of SKP2 as diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive type of lung cancer. The overall survival has not improved significantly over the last decades because no major therapeutic breakthroughs have been achieved for over 15 years.

METHODS

We analyzed a genome-wide loss-of-function screening database to identify vulnerabilities in SCLC for the development of urgently needed novel therapies.

RESULTS

We identified SKP2 (encoding S-phase kinase-associated protein 2) and CKS1B (encoding CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 1B) as the two most essential genes in that order in SCLC. Notably, SKP2 and CKS1B comprise the p27 binding pocket of the E3 ubiquitin ligase SCFSKP2 complex. Immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays revealed that SKP2 was expressed in >95% of samples at substantially higher levels than that observed for commonly used neuroendocrine markers. As expected, SCLC cell lines were sensitive to SKP2 inhibition. Furthermore, SKP2 or CKS1B knockdown induced apoptosis in RB1 mutant cells, whereas it induced senescence in RB1 wild-type cells.

CONCLUSION

Although the mechanism underlying SKP2 knockdown-induced growth inhibition differs between RB1-wild-type and -mutant SCLC, SKP2 can be considered a novel therapeutic target for patients with SCLC regardless of the RB1 mutation status. Our findings indicate that SKP2 is a potential novel clinical diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in SCLC.

Early Circulating Tumor DNA Shedding Kinetics for Prediction of Platinum Sensitivity in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by rapid progression after platinum resistance. Circulating tumor (ctDNA) dynamics early in treatment may help determine platinum sensitivity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serial plasma samples were collected from patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for SCLC on the first 3 days of cycle one and on the first days of subsequent cycles with paired samples collected both before and again after infusions. Tumor-informed plasma analysis was carried out using CAncer Personalized Profiling by deep Sequencing (CAPP-Seq). The mean variant allele frequency (VAF) of all pretreatment mutations was tracked in subsequent blood draws and correlated with radiologic response.

RESULTS

ctDNA kinetics were assessed in 122 samples from 21 patients. Pretreatment VAF did not differ significantly between patients who did and did not respond to chemotherapy (mean 22.5% v 4.6%, P = .17). A slight increase in ctDNA on cycle 1, day 1 immediately post-treatment was seen in six of the seven patients with available draws (fold change from baseline: 1.01-1.44), half of whom achieved a response. All patients who responded had a >2-fold decrease in mean VAF on cycle 2 day 1 (C2D1). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients with a >2-fold decrease in mean VAF after one treatment cycle (6.8 v 2.6 months, log-rank P = .0004 and 21.7 v 6.4 months, log rank P = .04, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A >2-fold decrease in ctDNA concentration was observed by C2D1 in all patients who were sensitive to platinum-based therapy and was associated with longer PFS and OS.

Real world results of locally advanced and metastatic lung cancer patients treated with platinum doublet chemotherapy in first line: Moroccan cohort

BACKGROUND

Doublet platin-chemotherapy was the old standard treatment for different histology types of advanced and metastatic lung cancer (LC) and is still an option for patients who are not eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, in low- and middle-income countries, chemotherapy, either in monotherapy or in combination with platinum, is still the only accessible option in public institutions. The efficacy of different platin-based chemotherapy in patients with LC who are treatment-naïve is unknown.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we selected patients with advanced and metastatic (IIIB-IVB) non-squamous non-small cell LC (NSCLC), squamous NSCLC, and lung neuroendocrine tumours (small cell LC (SCLC), large cell neuroendocrine, and atypical carcinoid) aged beyond 18 years who received first-line chemotherapy (docetaxel, gemcitabine, etoposide, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, and vinorelbine) combined with platinum between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022. Within the population with non-squamous NSCLC, squamous NSCLC, and neuroendocrine tumours, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary assessed endpoints. Hematologic safety was the secondary endpoint.

RESULTS

Overall, 611 patients were included. In the group of patients with non-squamous NSCLC (n = 390), there was no statistical difference between subgroups of patients who received first-line platin-chemotherapy. The median PFS was 182 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 167-208) days (hazard ratio for progression: NR [Not Reached]; p = 0.37), and the median OS was 446 (95 % CI, 405-559) days (hazard ratio for death: 1.31; 95 % CI, 0.94 - 1.82; p = 0.1). In the group of patients with squamous NSCLC (n = 149), we note the absence of statistical significance between subgroups of patients who received platin-based chemotherapy. The median PFS was 195 (95 % CI, 142-238; hazard ratio for progression: 1.21, 95 % CI, 0.29-5.02; p = 0.27), while the median OS was 428 (95 % CI, 324-940) days (hazard ratio for death: 1.76; 95 % CI, 0.93 to 3.3; p = 0.32). The absence of significance has been noticed in the neuroendocrine subgroup of patients who received first etoposide-platinum, vinorelbine-platinum, or paclitaxel-platinum (n = 72). The median PFS was 216 (95 % CI, 193-277) days; hazard ratio for progression: 1.74, 95 % CI, 0.41-7.27; p = 0.69, while the median OS was 273 (95 % CI, 241-459) days (hazard ratio for death: 2.95; 95 % CI, 0.4-21.7; p = 0.51). Grade 3-4 neutropenia grade was the predominant adverse event associated with chemotherapy in almost 11 % of patients.

CONCLUSION

Moving forward, treatment strategies must be refined for patients, with an emphasis on increasing the number of patients who can benefit from emergent approaches in order to guarantee a wider, deeper, and longer-lasting outcome.

Phase I/II trial of plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with recurrent small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Big ten cancer research consortium (BTCRC-LUN17-127) study

BACKGROUND

Plinabulin is a GEF-H1 releasing agent with an immune-enhancing function. We report results from a multicenter Phase I/II study (NCT03575793) assessing plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab for the treatment of recurrent SCLC.

METHODS

In Phase I, patients were enrolled using a 3 + 3 design to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). Patients received nivolumab (1 mg/kg), ipilimumab (3 mg/kg), and plinabulin (in escalating doses) on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for 4 cycles followed by maintenance with plinabulin and nivolumab. In phase II, patients with recurrent PD(L)1 inhibitor resistant SCLC were enrolled. The primary objective was median progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Between 9/2018 and 2/2023, 39 patients were enrolled, and 36 patients received study treatment and were evaluable for safety (16 in Phase I; 20 in Phase II). In the phase I dose-escalation, there were 2 DLTs; grade 3 altered mental status lasting <24 h and grade 3 infusion reaction. The Plinabulin RP2D was determined to be 30 mg/m2. Common TRAEs were vomiting (44 %), nausea (42 %), and infusion reaction (36 %); 6 % of patients had a ≥grade 3 TRAE. Five patients (14 %) had ≥grade 3 irAEs; there were no cases of immune-related pneumonitis. In the efficacy analysis in 27 patients, the median PFS was 1.6 months (95 % CI 1.2 to 2.7) and the trial did not meet the pre-specified target median PFS of 3.5 months. Four patients treated at 30 mg/m2 had PR (confirmed 1, unconfirmed 3); 5 patients had SD with a CBR of 33 %. Two of 8 patients treated in phase I at the lower 20 mg/m2 dose had confirmed PR, with 1 patient on the drug regimen for >90 cycles. The median OS and follow-up time were 5.5 months and 2.5 months respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Plinabulin in combination with nivolumab and ipilimumab was tolerable at the dose of 30 mg/m2. While the clinical responses in PD-1 resistant SCLC were limited, some patients had a long duration of response. The number of ≥grade 3 irAE with the combination were lower than expected.

Thymic epithelial tumor medical treatment: A narrative review

Thymic epithelial tumors, a malignancy originating in the thymus, are the commonest primary neoplasm of the anterior mediastinum; however, among thoracic tumors, they have a relatively low incidence rare. Thymic epithelial tumors can be broadly classified into thymic carcinoma and thymoma. As the cornerstone of thymic tumor treatment, surgery is the preferred treatment for early-stage patients, whereas, for advanced unresectable thymic tumors, the treatment is chemoradiotherapy. Targeted therapy is less effective for thymic tumors. Moreover, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as another effective treatment option for advanced unresectable thymic tumors, particularly thymomas, is limited owing to immune-related adverse effects. Here, we have summarized all pertinent information regarding chemotherapy, especially preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and chemotherapy in combination with other treatments, and reviewed the effectiveness of these procedures and recent advances in targeted therapy. In addition, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in thymic epithelial tumors, to provide a holistic treatment view.

Challenges and future perspectives for the use of temozolomide in the treatment of SCLC

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), accounting for 10-20 % of all lung tumors, represents the most aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. Most patients are diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), with brian metastases identified in ∼ 80 % of cases during the disease cours, and the prognosis is dismal, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5 %. Current available treatments in the second-line setting are limited, and topotecan has long been the only FDA-approved drug in relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC, until the recent approval of lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of RNA polymerase II. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent, which showed single-agent activity in SCLC, particularly among patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Several studies have revealed the synergistic activity of temozolomide with poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, that prevent repair of TMZ-induced DNA damage. This review focuses on the rationale for the use of TMZ in ES-SCLC and provides an overview of the main trials that have evaluated and are currently investigating its role, both as a single-agent and in combinations, in relapse or refractory disease.

Adebrelimab plus chemotherapy and sequential thoracic radiotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): a phase II trial

Background

This phase II prospective trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adebrelimab (PD-L1 antibody) plus first-line chemotherapy followed by sequential thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with adebrelimab in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Biomarkers associated with potential therapeutic effects were also explored.

Methods

Patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were enrolled at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Jinan, China). Patients received 4-6 cycles of adebrelimab (20 mg/kg, D1, Q3W) combined with EP/EC (etoposide, 100 mg/m2, D1-3, Q3W and cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, D1, Q3W or carboplatin, AUC = 5, D1, Q3W). Then patients with response sequentially underwent consolidative TRT (≥30 Gy in 10 fractions or ≥50 Gy in 25 fractions, involved-field irradiation), and maintenance adebrelimab until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Genomic and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) profiling were also analyzed with tumour tissues and peripheral blood. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04562337.

Findings

From October 2020 to April 2023, 67 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. 45 patients received sequential TRT as planned. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.4 months (95% CI: 17.2-not reached months) and 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.9-15.5 months), respectively. The confirmed objective response rate was 71.6% (48/67, 95% CI: 59.3-82.0%) and disease control rate was 89.6% (60/67, 95% CI: 79.7-95.7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hematological toxicities. The incidence of any grade and G3+ pneumonitis was 25% (17/67) and 6% (4/67), respectively. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Patients without co-mutations of TP53/RB1 in both tissue and peripheral blood displayed longer PFS (tissue, P = 0.071; ctDNA, P = 0.060) and OS (tissue, P = 0.032; ctDNA, P = 0.031).

Interpretation

Adebrelimab plus chemotherapy and sequential TRT as first-line therapy for ES-SCLC showed promising efficacy and acceptable safety.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172865), Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd.

Impact of thoracic radiotherapy on first-line treatment outcomes in ES-SCLC patients

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic advantage of thoracic radiotherapy (tRT) as an adjunct to first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains unclear. We sought to elucidate this in a retrospective cohort study comparing the effectiveness and safety of tRT in combination with first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included patients with ES-SCLC, treated at the West China Hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. They received first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy and were categorized into two cohorts based on the administration of tRT. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify potential independent predictors of prognosis and to compare the treatment outcomes across various patient subgroups. Treatment-related toxicities across both cohorts were compared using the Chi-squared test.

RESULTS

A total of 99patients were eligible for the study, out of which 55 received tRT. The medianduration of follow-up was 39 months. Remarkably, patients who received tRTdemonstrated superior OS and PFS in comparison to those who did not (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis further confirmed these findings. Multivariate analysisidentified treatment group and liver metastasis as independent prognosticfactors (P < 0.05). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events showed nostatistically significant difference between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, weconfirmed that the addition of tRT to the conventional regimen of first-linechemotherapy and immunotherapy yields better survival outcomes without asignificant increase in toxicity.

Effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors at different treatment time periods on prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has brought us new hope, but the real-world outcome is relatively lacking. Our aim was to investigate the clinical use, efficacy, and survival benefit of ICIs in ES-SCLC from real-world data analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of ES-SCLC patients was conducted between 2012 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed between groups to evaluate the value of ICIs at different lines of treatment. PFS1 was defined as the duration from initial therapy to disease progression or death. PFS2 was defined as the duration from the first disease progression to the second disease progression or death.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty patients with ES-SCLC were included. We performed landmark analysis, which showed that compared to the second-line and subsequent-lines ICIs-combined therapy group (2SL-ICIs) and non-ICIs group, the first-line ICIs-combined therapy group (1L-ICIs) prolonged OS and PFS1. There was a trend toward prolonged OS in the 2SL-ICIs group than in the non-ICIs group, but the significance threshold was not met (median OS 11.94 months vs. 11.10 months, P = 0.14). A longer PFS2 was present in the 2SL-ICIs group than in the non-ICIs group (median PFS2 4.13 months vs. 2.60 months, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

First-line ICIs plus chemotherapy should be applied in clinical practice. If patients did not use ICIs plus chemotherapy in first-line therapy, the use of ICIs in the second line or subsequent lines of treatment could prolong PFS2.

Stimulation of cGAS-STING pathway as a challenge in the treatment of small cell lung cancer: a feasible strategy?

Lung cancer has a significant incidence among the population and, unfortunately, has an unfavourable prognosis in most cases. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies lung tumours into two subtypes based on their phenotype: the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and the Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). SCLC treatment, despite advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, is often unsuccessful for cancer recurrence highlighting the need to develop novel therapeutic strategies. In this review, we describe the genetic landscape and tumour microenvironment that characterize the pathological processes of SCLC and how they are responsible for tumour immune evasion. The immunosuppressive mechanisms engaged in SCLC are critical factors to understand the failure of immunotherapy in SCLC and, conversely, suggest that new signalling pathways, such as cGAS/STING, should be investigated as possible targets to stimulate an innate immune response in this subtype of lung cancer. The full comprehension of the innate immunity of cancer cells is thus crucial to open new challenges for successful immunotherapy in treating SCLC and improving patient outcomes.

Trilaciclib use in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): are clinical benefits seen in the real-world setting?

BACKGROUND

Trilaciclib, in comparison to placebo plus carboplatin, etoposide, ± atezolizumab (PEA), has shown significant reductions in incidence of severe neutropenia (SN) among patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Despite these findings, real-world utility remains limited.

METHODS

A single-center quasi-experimental study compared trilaciclib + PEA (PEAT) versus PEA in ES-SCLC patients. The study period ranged from April 1, 2021 to July 31, 2022, for the PEAT recipients and February 1, 2020, to February 28, 2021, for PEA recipients. The primary endpoint evaluated was incidence of SN after cycle 1 and during the treatment period. Secondary endpoints included measures related to myelopreservation and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 34 PEAT and 44 PEA patients, baseline characteristics were similar, except for a higher median age (69 vs 64 years) and more males (64.7% vs 38.6%) in the PEAT cohort. The PEAT cohort exhibited a lower SN rate (3%) versus the PEA cohort (18%), with statistical significance demonstrated on multivariate analysis (p = 0.015). Additionally, the PEAT cohort also demonstrated significant reductions in red blood cell transfusion requirements (3% vs 23%; p = 0.02), grade 3-4 anemia (6% vs 25%; p = 0.03), and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (0% vs 11%, p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Trilaciclib, in combination with PEA, demonstrated an improvement in the safety profile without compromising survival outcomes in ES-SCLC patients. These findings underscore the potential benefits of incorporating trilaciclib in real-world clinical settings for enhanced patient care.

Characteristics of molecular subtypes and cinical outcomes in the immunotherapy Queue of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

With a series of clinical trials confirming the sensitivity of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) to immunotherapy, research on personalized treatment for SCLC has gained increasing attention. Currently, the most widely accepted subtype of SCLC is based on the expression levels of Achaete-Scute Family BHLH Transcription Factor 1 (ASCL1), neurogenic differentiation factor 1 (NEUROD1), and POU class 2 homeobox 3 (POU2F3). However, real-world studies on this classification remain limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected biopsy specimens from patients who received immunotherapy at Shandong Provincial Hospital between January 2019 and July 2021. After determining the patient subtypes using immunohistochemistry, we analyzed the relationships between each subtype and survival as well as some clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

In our study, we found that the subtype I achieved a significant survival advantage compared to the other groups. Additionally, the subtype A demonstrated a significant survival disadvantage. Among patients in the subtype I, there was a higher proportion of early brain metastasis and patients with a family history of tumors, while the subtype A had a lower proportion. Furthermore, the subtype A exhibited relatively poor immune infiltration.

CONCLUSION

In a diverse cohort of SCLC patients receiving immunotherapy, the subtype-I showed significant survival advantages while the subtype-A experienced a worse survival.

Sustained Clinical Benefit and Intracranial Activity of Tarlatamab in Previously Treated Small Cell Lung Cancer: DeLLphi-300 Trial Update

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Tarlatamab, a bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy targeting delta-like ligand 3, has shown durable anticancer activity and manageable safety in previously treated small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in DeLLphi-300 phase I and DeLLphi-301 phase II trials. Here, we report extended follow-up of DeLLphi-300 (median follow-up, 12.1 months [range, 0.2-34.3]) in fully enrolled cohorts treated with tarlatamab ≥10 mg dose administered once every two weeks, once every three weeks, or once on day 1 and once on day 8 of a 21-day cycle (N = 152). Overall, the objective response rate (ORR) was 25.0%; the median duration of response (mDOR) was 11.2 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 22.3), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 17.5 months (95% CI, 11.4 to not estimable [NE]). Among 17 patients receiving 10 mg tarlatamab once every two weeks, the ORR was 35.3%, the mDOR was 14.9 months (95% CI, 3.0 to NE), the mOS was 20.3 months (95% CI, 5.1 to NE), and 29.4% had sustained disease control with time on treatment ≥52 weeks. No new safety signals were identified. In modified Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases analyses, CNS tumor shrinkage of ≥30% was observed in 62.5% of patients (10 of 16) who had a baseline CNS lesion of ≥10 mm, including in a subset of patients with tumor shrinkage long after previous brain radiotherapy. In DeLLphi-300 extended follow-up, tarlatamab demonstrated unprecedented survival and potential findings of intracranial activity in previously treated SCLC.

ERCC1 and ERCC2 Polymorphisms Predict the Efficacy and Toxicity of Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Standard first-line chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is based on the platinum plus etoposide combination. Despite a high objective response rate, responses are not durable and chemotherapy-induced toxicity may compromise treatment. Genetic variants in genes involved in the DNA-repair pathways and in etoposide metabolization could predict treatment efficacy and safety and help personalize platinum-based chemotherapy. Germline polymorphisms in XRCC1, ERCC1, ERCC2, ABCB1, ABCC3, UGT1A1 and GSTP1 genes were investigated in 145 patients with SCLC. The tumor expression of ERCC1 was determined using immunohistochemistry, and the tumor expression of ERCC1-XPF was determined via a proximity ligation assay. Survival analyses showed a statistically significant association between the ERCC1 rs11615 variant and median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with limited-stage (LS) SCLC (multivariate: hazard ratio 3.25, [95% CI 1.38-7.70]; p = 0.007). Furthermore, we observed differences between the ERCC1-XPF complex and median PFS in LS-SCLC, although statistical significance was not reached (univariate: positive expression 10.8 [95% CI 4.09-17.55] months versus negative expression 13.3 [95% CI 7.32-19.31] months; p = 0.06). Safety analyses showed that the ERCC2 rs1799793 variant was significantly associated with the risk of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia in the total cohort (multivariate: odds ratio 3.15, [95% CI 1.08-9.17]; p = 0.04). Our results provide evidence that ERCC1 and ERCC2 variants may predict the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in SCLC patients. LS-SCLC patients may benefit most from ERCC1 determination, but prospective studies are needed.

Small cell lung cancer profiling: an updated synthesis of subtypes, vulnerabilities, and plasticity

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a devastating disease with high proliferative and metastatic capacity. SCLC has been classified into molecular subtypes based on differential expression of lineage-defining transcription factors. Recent studies have proposed new subtypes that are based on both tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic factors. SCLC demonstrates substantial intratumoral subtype heterogeneity characterized by highly plastic transcriptional states, indicating that the initially dominant subtype can shift during disease progression and in association with resistance to therapy. Strategies to promote or constrain plasticity and cell fate transitions have nominated novel targets that could prompt the development of more durably effective therapies for patients with SCLC. In this review, we describe the latest advances in SCLC subtype classification and their biological and clinical implications.

High-cost treatments for advanced lung cancer in Japan (Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group)

BACKGROUND

The treatment of lung cancer has made dramatic progress in the past decade, but due to the high cost of drugs, the total pharmaceutical cost has been rising explosively. There are currently no data available in Japan on which regimens are used, to what extent they are used, and what their total cost is.

METHODS

Sixty Japanese centers belonging to the Lung Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group were surveyed for information about the first-line treatment for advanced lung cancer in practice from July 2021 to June 2022. Three types of cancer were included: driver gene mutation-negative NSCLC, EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, and extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

RESULTS

Recent treatment costs for ICIs or ICI plus chemotherapy were about 20-55 times higher than those for conventional chemotherapy. Of the 3738 patients with driver gene aberration-negative NSCLC, 2573 (68.8%) received treatments with monthly cost of 500 000 Japanese yen (JPY) or more; 2555 (68.4%) received ICI therapy. Of the 1486 patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, 1290 (86.8%) received treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more; 1207 (81.2%) received osimertinib. ICI treatments with a monthly cost of 500 000 JPY or more were administered to 607 (56.3%) of 1079 patients with ES-SCLC. Elderly NSCLC patients received slightly more high-cost treatment than younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Recent treatments cost many times more than conventional chemotherapy. This study revealed that high-cost treatments were widely used in advanced lung cancer and some of high-cost treatments were used despite the lack of clear evidence. Physicians should pay attention to the cost of treatments they use.

Immunotherapy for small cell lung cancer: the current state and future trajectories

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) constitutes approximately 10% to 15% of all lung cancer diagnoses and represents a pressing global public health challenge due to its high mortality rates. The efficacy of conventional treatments for SCLC is suboptimal, characterized by limited anti-tumoral effects and frequent relapses. In this context, emerging research has pivoted towards immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, a rapidly advancing field that has shown promise in ameliorating the clinical outcomes of SCLC patients. Through originally developed for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), these therapies have extended new treatment avenues for SCLC. Currently, a nexus of emerging hot-spot treatments has demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy. Based on the amalgamation of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and the development of new immunotherapy agents, the treatment of SCLC has seen the hoping future. Progress has been achieved in enhancing the tumor immune microenvironment through the concomitant use of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), as evinced by emerging clinical trial data. Moreover, a tripartite approach involving immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy appears auspicious for future clinical applications. Overcoming resistance to post-immunotherapy regimens remains an urgent area of exploration. Finally, bispecific antibodies, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), oncolytic virus, monotherapy, including Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) and T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), as well as precision medicine, may present a prospective route towards achieving curative outcomes in SCLC. This review aims to synthesize extant literature and highlight future directions in SCLC treatment, acknowledging the persistent challenges in the field. Furthermore, the continual development of novel therapeutic agents and technologies renders the future of SCLC treatment increasingly optimistic.

Predicting Durable Clinical Benefits of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Nomogram Based on CT Imaging and Immune Type

PURPOSE

To develop a model based on conventional CT signs and the tumor microenvironment immune types (TIMT) to predict the durable clinical benefits (DCB) of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 205 patients with NSCLC underwent preoperative CT and were divided into two groups: DCB (progression-free survival (PFS) ≥ 18 months) and non-DCB (NDCB, PFS <18 months). The density percentiles of PD-L1 and CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were quantified to estimate the TIMT. Clinical characteristics and conventional CT signs were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to select the most discriminating parameters, construct a predictive model, and visualize the model as a nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate prediction performance and clinical utility.

RESULTS

Precisely 118 patients with DCB and 87 with NDCB in NSCLC received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. TIMT was statistically different between the DCB and NDCB groups (P < 0.05). Clinical characteristics (neuron-specific enolase, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, Ki-76, and cM stage) and conventional CT signs (spiculation, bubble-like lucency, pleural retraction, maximum diameter, and CT value of the venous phase) varied between the four TIMT groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, clinical characteristics (lymphocyte count [LYMPH] and cM stage) and conventional CT signs (bubble-like lucency and Pleural effusion) differed between the DCB and NDCB groups (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that TIMT, cM stage, LYMPH, and pleural effusion were independently associated with DCB and were used to construct a nomogram. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combined model was 0.70 (95%CI: 0.64-0.76), with sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.60, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Conventional CT signs and the TIMT offer a promising approach to predicting clinical outcomes for patients treated with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in NSCLC.

DARES: A Phase II Trial of Durvalumab and Ablative Radiation in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy is first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Growing evidence suggests that radiation, specifically stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), may enhance the immunogenic response as well as cytoreduce tumor burden. The primary objective of the study is to determine the progression free survival for patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC treated with combination multisite SBRT and chemo-immunotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, and durvalumab).

METHODS

This is a multicenter, single arm, phase 2 study. Patients with treatment-naïve, ES-SCLC will be eligible for this study. Patients will receive durvalumab 1500mg IV q3w, carboplatin AUC 5 to 6 mg/mL q3w, and etoposide 80 to 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 q3w for four cycles, followed by durvalumab 1500mg IV q4w until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Ablative radiation will be delivered 1 to 4 extracranial sites in 3 or 5 fractions, determined by location, during cycle 2. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival, measured from day 1 of chemoimmunotherapy. Secondary endpoints include grade ≥3 toxicity by CTCAE v5.0 within three months of RT, overall survival, response rate, time to second line systemic therapy, and time to new distant progression.

CONCLUSIONS

Now that immunotherapy is an established part of ES-SCLC management, it is important to further optimize its use and effect. This study will investigate the progression-free survival of combined SBRT and chemo-immunotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. In addition, the data from this study may further inform the immunogenic role of SBRT with chemo-immunotherapy, as well as identify clinical, biological, or radiomic prognostic features.

Lung Cancer and Interstitial Lung Diseases

Lung cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of cancer-related death worldwide. There is evidence of a complex interplay between lung cancer and interstitial lung disease (ILD), affecting disease progression, management strategies, and patient outcomes. Both conditions develop as the result of common risk factors such as smoking, environmental exposures, and genetic predispositions. The presence of ILD poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in lung cancer management, including difficulties in interpreting radiological findings and increased susceptibility to treatment-related toxicities, such as acute exacerbation of ILD after surgery and pneumonitis after radiation therapy and immunotherapy. Moreover, due to the lack of large, phase III randomized controlled trials, the evidence-based therapeutic options for patients with ILDs and lung cancer remain limited. Antifibrotic treatment may help prevent pulmonary toxicity due to lung cancer treatment, but its effect is still unclear. Emerging diagnostic modalities and biomarkers and optimizing personalized treatment strategies are essential to improve outcomes in this patient population.

Strategies to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody, anti-PD-L1 antibody and anti-CTLA-4 antibody in cancer therapy

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1 antibody, anti-PD-L1 antibody, and anti-CTLA-4 antibody) have displayed considerable success in the treatment of malignant tumors, the therapeutic effect is still unsatisfactory for a portion of patients. Therefore, it is imperative to develop strategies to enhance the effect of these ICIs. Increasing evidence strongly suggests that the key to this issue is to transform the tumor immune microenvironment from a state of no or low immune infiltration to a state of high immune infiltration and enhance the tumor cell-killing effect of T cells. Therefore, some combination strategies have been proposed and this review appraise a summary of 39 strategies aiming at enhancing the effectiveness of ICIs, which comprise combining 10 clinical approaches and 29 foundational research strategies. Moreover, this review improves the comprehensive understanding of combination therapy with ICIs and inspires novel ideas for tumor immunotherapy.

Nivolumab plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in treatment-naive patients with advanced grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of gastroenteropancreatic or unknown origin: The multicenter phase 2 NICE-NEC trial (GETNE-T1913)

The prognosis of patients with advanced high-grade (G3) digestive neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is rather poor. The addition of immune checkpoint inhibition to platinum-based chemotherapy may improve survival. NICE-NEC (NCT03980925) is a single-arm, phase II trial that recruited chemotherapy-naive, unresectable advanced or metastatic G3 NENs of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) or unknown origin. Patients received nivolumab 360 mg intravenously (iv) on day 1, carboplatin AUC 5 iv on day 1, and etoposide 100 mg/m2/d iv on days 1-3, every 3 weeks for up to six cycles, followed by nivolumab 480 mg every 4 weeks for up to 24 months, disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate (H0 50%, H1 72%, β 80%, α 5%). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. From 2019 to 2021, 37 patients were enrolled. The most common primary sites were the pancreas (37.8%), stomach (16.2%) and colon (10.8%). Twenty-five patients (67.6%) were poorly differentiated carcinomas (NECs) and/or had a Ki67 index >55%. The ORR was 56.8%. Median PFS was 5.7 months (95%CI: 5.1-9) and median OS 13.9 months (95%CI: 8.3-Not reached), with a 12-month OS rate of 54.1% (95%CI: 40.2-72.8) that did not meet the primary endpoint. However, 37.6% of patients were long-term survivors (>2 years). The safety profile was consistent with previous reports. There was one treatment-related death. Nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with prolonged survival in over one-third of chemonaïve patients with G3 GEP-NENs, with a manageable safety profile.

Predictive Signatures for Responses to Checkpoint Blockade in Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Second-Line Therapy Do Not Predict Responses in First-Line Patients

Although immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is currently approved for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in combination with chemotherapy, relatively few patients have demonstrated durable clinical benefit (DCB) to these therapies. Biomarkers predicting responses are needed. Biopsies from 35 SCLC patients treated with ICB were subjected to transcriptomic analysis; gene signatures were assessed for associations with responses. Twenty-one patients were treated with ICB in the first-line setting in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy; fourteen patients were treated in the second-line setting with ICB alone. DCB after ICB in SCLC in the second-line setting (3 of 14 patients) was associated with statistically higher transcriptomic levels of genes associated with inflammation (p = 0.003), antigen presentation machinery (p = 0.03), interferon responses (p < 0.05), and increased CD8 T cells (p = 0.02). In contrast, these gene signatures were not significantly different in the first-line setting. Our data suggest that responses to ICB in SCLC in the second-line setting can be predicted by the baseline inflammatory state of the tumor; however, this strong association with inflammation was not seen in the first-line setting. We postulate that chemotherapy alters the immune milieu allowing a response to ICB. Other biomarkers will be needed to predict responses in first-line therapy patients.

Real-World Survival Impact of New Treatment Strategies for Lung Cancer: A 2000-2020 French Cohort

Over the past 20 years, several innovative therapies have been implemented in the treatment of lung cancer that have had reported survival benefits in clinical trials. Whether these improvements translate into the clinic setting has not been studied yet. We retrospectively analyzed all patients consecutively treated at Institute Curie for metastatic lung cancer. Diagnosis date was used to define three periods, based on the approvals of novel treatment strategies in the first-line setting, including targeted therapies in 2010 and immunotherapy in 2018. Endpoints included Overall survival (OS), survival rate of 2 years and 5 years, and a conditional survival rate of 2 years (if still alive at 6 months from treatment initiation). A total of 673 patients were identified for Period 1-2000 to 2009, 752 for Period 2-2010 to 2017, and 768 for Period 3-2018 to 2020. Median OS in the whole cohort was 11.1, 15.5, and 16.2 months, respectively. Median OS for patients with NSCLC or SCLC was 11.2, 17.2, and 18.2 months, or 10.9, 11.7, and 11.2 months, respectively. The two-year conditional survival was more favorable for NSCLC than SCLC patients. Outcomes were statistically higher for women as compared to men in all periods and all subgroups. Survival of patients with metastatic lung cancer has improved over the past 20 years, mostly in NSCLC, along with the implementation of novel treatment strategies.

Small cell lung cancer: emerging subtypes, signaling pathways, and therapeutic vulnerabilities

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recalcitrant cancer characterized by early metastasis, rapid tumor growth and poor prognosis. In recent decades, the epidemiology, initiation and mutation characteristics of SCLC, as well as abnormal signaling pathways contributing to its progression, have been widely studied. Despite extensive investigation, fewer drugs have been approved for SCLC. Recent advancements in multi-omics studies have revealed diverse classifications of SCLC that are featured by distinct characteristics and therapeutic vulnerabilities. With the accumulation of SCLC samples, different subtypes of SCLC and specific treatments for these subtypes were further explored. The identification of different molecular subtypes has opened up novel avenues for the treatment of SCLC; however, the inconsistent and uncertain classification of SCLC has hindered the translation from basic research to clinical applications. Therefore, a comprehensives review is essential to conclude these emerging subtypes and related drugs targeting specific therapeutic vulnerabilities within abnormal signaling pathways. In this current review, we summarized the epidemiology, risk factors, mutation characteristics of and classification, related molecular pathways and treatments for SCLC. We hope that this review will facilitate the translation of molecular subtyping of SCLC from theory to clinical application.

Effects of brain radiotherapy strategies on survival in the era of MRI for patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In the context of the widespread availability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and aggressive salvage irradiation techniques, there has been controversy surrounding the use of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. This study aimed to explore whether regular brain MRI plus salvage brain irradiation (SBI) is not inferior to PCI in patients with limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC).

METHODS

This real-world multicenter study, which was conducted between January 2014 and September 2020 at three general hospitals, involved patients with LS-SCLC who had a good response to initial chemoradiotherapy and no brain metastasis confirmed by MRI. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who did not receive PCI for various reasons but chose regular MRI surveillance and followed salvage brain irradiation (SBI) when brain metastasis was detected and patients who received PCI.

RESULTS

120 patients met the inclusion criteria. 55 patients received regular brain MRI plus SBI (SBI group) and 65 patients received PCI (PCI group). There was no statistically significant difference in median OS between the two groups (27.14 versus 33.00 months; P = 0.18). In the SBI group, 32 patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy and 23 patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy + simultaneous integrated boost. On multivariate analysis, only extracranial metastasis was independently associated with poor OS in the SBI group.

CONCLUSION

The results of this real-world study showed that MRI surveillance plus SBI is not inferior to PCI in OS for LS-SCLC patients who had a good response to initial chemoradiotherapy.