Cancer prevention with aspirin in hereditary colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome), 10-year follow-up and registry-based 20-year data in the CAPP2 study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Metabolic crosstalk between platelets and cancer: Mechanisms, functions, and therapeutic potential

Platelets, traditionally regarded as passive mediators of hemostasis, are now recognized as pivotal regulators in the tumor microenvironment, establishing metabolic feedback loops with tumor and immune cells. Tumor-derived signals trigger platelet activation, which induces rapid metabolic reprogramming, particularly glycolysis, to support activation-dependent functions such as granule secretion, morphological changes, and aggregation. Beyond self-regulation, platelets influence the metabolic processes of adjacent cells. Through direct mitochondrial transfer, platelets reprogram tumor and immune cells, promoting oxidative phosphorylation. Additionally, platelet-derived cytokines, granules, and extracellular vesicles drive metabolic alterations in immune cells, fostering suppressive phenotypes that facilitate tumor progression. This review examines three critical aspects: (1) the distinctive metabolic features of platelets, particularly under tumor-induced activation; (2) the metabolic crosstalk between activated platelets and other cellular components; and (3) the therapeutic potential of targeting platelet metabolism to disrupt tumor-promoting networks. By elucidating platelet metabolism, this review highlights its essential role in tumor biology and its therapeutic implications.

Genomic and cellular responses to aspirin in colonic organoids from African- and European-Americans

Aspirin (ASA) is a proven chemoprotective agent for colorectal cancer (CRC), though interindividual responses and cellular mechanisms are not well characterized. Human organoids are ideal to study treatment responses across individuals. Here, colonic organoids from African-Americans (AA) and European-Americans (EA) were used to profile genomic and cellular ASA responses. Colonic organoids from 67 participants, 33 AA and 34 EA, were treated with 3 mM ASA or vehicle control for 24 h. Gene expression was assessed by RNA-seq, and differentially responsive genes were analyzed by condition, population, and for gene set enrichment. Top differentially responsive genes were assessed by time and ASA doses in independent organoids. Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) mapping was performed to identify variants associated with condition-specific responses. Apoptosis and necrosis assays were performed, and apoptosis gene expression was measured in organoids. Overall, 8,343 genes were differentially responsive to ASA with differences between AA and EA. Significant enrichment for fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling was found. Significant treatment eQTLs were identified for relevant genes involved in FAO, apoptosis, and prostaglandin metabolism. ASA-induced apoptosis and secondary necrosis were confirmed with the identification of significant differential responses of apoptotic genes to ASA. Results demonstrate large transcriptional responses to ASA treatment with differences in responses between individuals. Genomic and cellular results suggest that ASA effects on the mitochondria are key mechanisms of action that could underlie clinical effects. These results could be used to assess clinical treatment responses for chemoprevention in the future.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Aspirin treatment in colonic organoids from diverse individuals revealed significant transcriptome-wide responses, especially for genes in lipid and apoptosis signaling pathways. In normal organoids, apoptosis was induced by aspirin, providing one possible mechanism of colorectal cancer chemoprevention. Our results are a first step toward implementation of personalized medicine for aspirin in colorectal cancer prevention.

Lynch Syndrome: Similarities and Differences of Recommendations in Published Guidelines

BACKGROUND

In this review, we aimed to compare the recommendations for Lynch syndrome (LS).

METHODS

We compared the LS's guidelines of different medical societies, including recommendations for cancer surveillance, aspirin treatment, and universal screening.

RESULTS

Most guidelines for LS patients recommend intervals of 1-2 years for performing colonoscopy, though there is disagreement regarding the age to begin CRC screening (dependent on status as a MLH1/MSH2 or MSH6/PMS2 carrier). There are inconsistencies between LS guidelines for gastric cancer surveillance. Most guidelines do not recommend routine surveillance of the pancreas and small bowel. Most but not all of the guidelines support endometrial and ovarian surveillance with transvaginal ultrasound and endometrial biopsy. Only two societies recommend urological surveillance, while others recommend surveillance among high-risk carriers with family history only. There is significant disagreement between the guidelines about the recommendation for limited or extended bowel resection among patients with CRC. Aspirin use is recommended by most societies, though some with reservations, and most of them recommend universal screening.

CONCLUSIONS

There are significant disparities and disagreements in the guidelines and recommendations for patients with LS, causing confusion and difficulties for clinicians. Harmonization and cooperation are needed between the societies creating LS guidelines.

Acetylsalicylic acid and cancer: updates on the new potential of a nature-inspired drug

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), commonly known as aspirin, is an organic compound with the formula C9H8O4 obtained from the natural compound salicylic acid, recognized for its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and anticancer properties. Its role in medicine and plant biology is well-established, but its emerging potential in cancer treatment has garnered increased attention. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the therapeutic applications of ASA as an anticancer agent, focusing on its mechanisms, effectiveness, and role as an adjuvant therapy, preventive compound, and radioprotective agent. Recent research papers, including mechanistic studies, preclinical investigations, and clinical trials related to the effects of ASA on various cancer types, were reviewed. The review places particular emphasis on the enhancement of traditional chemotherapy drugs by ASA and considers toxicological aspects. The analysis of recent studies highlights the potential of ASA to improve the effectiveness of chemotherapy and its role in cancer inhibition through specific molecular pathways. Mechanistic insights suggest that ASA may influence cellular processes that contribute to cancer growth suppression and increased sensitivity to conventional treatments. ASA exhibits promising potential as an adjunct therapy in cancer treatment, with evidence supporting its benefits in improving therapeutic outcomes when used alongside conventional chemotherapy. Further studies are needed to clarify its mechanisms and ensure its safe and effective application in clinical settings.

Inflammation in cancer: therapeutic opportunities from new insights

As one part of the innate immune response to external stimuli, chronic inflammation increases the risk of various cancers, and tumor-promoting inflammation is considered one of the enabling characteristics of cancer development. Recently, there has been growing evidence on the role of anti-inflammation therapy in cancer prevention and treatment. And researchers have already achieved several noteworthy outcomes. In the review, we explored the underlying mechanisms by which inflammation affects the occurrence and development of cancer. The pro- or anti-tumor effects of these inflammatory factors such as interleukin, interferon, chemokine, inflammasome, and extracellular matrix are discussed. Since FDA-approved anti-inflammation drugs like aspirin show obvious anti-tumor effects, these drugs have unique advantages due to their relatively fewer side effects with long-term use compared to chemotherapy drugs. The characteristics make them promising candidates for cancer chemoprevention. Overall, this review discusses the role of these inflammatory molecules in carcinogenesis of cancer and new inflammation molecules-directed therapeutic opportunities, ranging from cytokine inhibitors/agonists, inflammasome inhibitors, some inhibitors that have already been or are expected to be applied in clinical practice, as well as recent discoveries of the anti-tumor effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The advantages and disadvantages of their application in cancer chemoprevention are also discussed.

Significance of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer

Cervical cancer, ranking as the fourth most common cancer in women globally, is closely linked to chronic inflammation resulting from persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Chronic inflammation mediated by cyclooxygenase (COX) has been identified as a factor in cancer onset and progression, with HPV oncoproteins E6 and E7 inducing COX activation. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have demonstrated the capability to significantly inhibit COX activity, playing a crucial preventive and therapeutic role in various tumors. This paper explores the therapeutic value and potential clinical applications of NSAIDs in cervical cancer by examining the mechanistic interactions between HPV and COX and the carcinogenic effects of COX in cervical cancer.

Dataset for a qualitative interview study exploring the barriers and facilitators to using and recommending aspirin for cancer prevention

Introduction

Aspirin is increasingly recommended for colorectal cancer prevention for people with Lynch syndrome, who are at higher risk. Before starting aspirin, patients should be reviewed by a healthcare professional for contraindications. We conducted interviews to explore the views of people with Lynch syndrome and healthcare professionals on aspirin for cancer prevention. While open data sharing is increasingly implemented for quantitative research, it is less likely to be adopted for qualitative data. We aimed to create and share a qualitative dataset of the interview transcripts in a restricted access repository.

Methods

We interviewed 15 people with Lynch syndrome and 23 healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals included general practitioners (GPs), community pharmacists, genetic counsellors, and specialist hospital clinicians (e.g. genetics, gastroenterology). The interview schedule was informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were conducted over video or telephone.

Results

Participants could consent to their anonymised interview transcript being deposited in a restricted repository, with access limited to people using the data for non-commercial research, learning or teaching purposes. Those who did not consent could still participate in the interview. Several transcripts were removed due to identifiability concerns. In total, we deposited 12 transcripts with people with Lynch syndrome, and 8 transcripts with GPs.

Discussion

To safeguard participants' identities, we fully anonymised the dataset. While this acted to protect participants' identities, it also potentially reduced its usability due to the removal of rich contextual detail. When sharing qualitative data, it is important to balance confidentiality with data reusability.

Role of aspirin in cancer prevention

Aspirin [1], also known as acetylsalicylic acid, is a common non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). The available evidence shows that aspirin can effectively prevent and treat diseases such as rectal, gastric, ovarian, prostate, and lung cancer. Aspirin has been extensively studied for the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer. In recent years, studies have found that the potential mechanism of aspirin in the prevention and treatment of cancer may lie in immune regulation, the role of DNA repair pathways, the regulation of cell metabolism, anti-inflammatory effects and antiplatelet effects.

Influence of Lifestyles on Polyp Burden and Cancer Development in Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes

BACKGROUND

Whether the progression of precursor lesions or the occurrence of cancer is influenced by lifestyle factors in carriers of genetic mutations has not been fully investigated, especially in Asian patients of hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome.

METHODS

Patients at a high risk of hereditary CRC were included. For polyposis CRC syndromes, colorectal polyp burden was measured using at least 60 images per colonoscopy in each patient and classified into five stages using the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours staging system according to the polyp number and size. Increase in tumor burden stage for polyposis CRC syndrome and the occurrence of CRC or any cancer for Lynch syndrome were analyzed according to lifestyle factors.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients with suspected hereditary polyposis CRC syndrome and 106 patients with Lynch syndrome were recruited. For polyposis CRC syndromes, multivariate analysis showed that exposure to smoking and > 100 polyps independently predicted a high risk of increased polyp burden (p = 0.008 and p = 0.012, respectively). Significant genetic mutations or phenotype of polyposis syndromes were significantly associated with an increased polyp burden. For Lynch syndrome, smokers showed to be diagnosed with CRC in younger age than never-smokers (42.2 years vs. 49.0 years; p = 0.021), and heavy drinkers had high risk for occurrence of CRC (HR, 2.381, 95% CI, 1.338-4.236; p = 0.003) and any cancer (HR, 2.254; 95% CI, 1.334-3.806; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The lifestyle factors (smoking and alcohol consumption) were associated with increasing precursor lesions and occurrence of cancer in patients with hereditary CRC syndrome. Lifestyle modifications may reduce the risk of hereditary CRC in carriers.

Emerging therapeutic strategies in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer and the role of MMR testing

Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary cancer predisposition, accounting for 1-5% of colorectal cancer cases, and is driven by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. Despite established diagnostic criteria, such as the Amsterdam guidelines, Lynch syndrome remains largely underdiagnosed. To address this gap, universal tumour screening has been introduced for all newly diagnosed cases of colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer, significantly improving early detection. The surgical management of colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome remains controversial. While extended colectomy reduces the risk of metachronous colorectal cancer, surgical strategies must be carefully individualised based on patient-specific factors. Chemoprevention with aspirin has shown promise in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer, with ongoing trials investigating optimal dosing. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, has revolutionised the treatment of Microsatellite Instability-High/deficient Mismatch Repair colorectal cancer, offering durable responses and significant survival benefits. In addition, the neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is paving the way for non-surgical interventions, potentially transforming the management of colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome. A multidisciplinary approach and continued research are essential to optimise cancer prevention, treatment and quality of life for people with Lynch syndrome.

Colorectal carcinogenesis in the Lynch syndromes and familial adenomatous polyposis: trigger events and downstream consequences

Carcinogenesis encompasses processes that lead to increased mutation rates, enhanced cellular division (tumour growth), and invasive growth. Colorectal cancer (CRC) carcinogenesis in carriers of pathogenic APC (path_APC) and pathogenic mismatch repair gene (path_MMR) variants is initiated by a second hit affecting the corresponding wild-type allele. In path_APC carriers, second hits result in the development of multiple adenomas, with CRC typically emerging after an additional 20 years. In path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 carriers, second hits lead to the formation of microscopically detectable, microsatellite unstable (MSI) crypts, from which CRC develops in about half of carriers over their lifetime, often without progressing through a diagnosable adenoma stage. These divergent outcomes reflect the distinct functions of. the APC and MMR genes. In path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 carriers, a direct consequence of stochastic mutations may be the occurrence of invasive growth before tumour expansion, challenging the paradigm that an invasive cancer must always have an non-invasive precursor. In contrast to other path_ MMR carriers, path_PMS2 carriers who receive colonoscopic surveillance exhibit minimal increase in CRC incidence. This is consistent with a hybrid model: the initial mutation may cause an adenoma, and the second hit in the wild-type PMS2 allele may drive the adenoma towards become cancerous with MSI. Since all mutational events are stochastic, interventions aimed at preventing or curing cancer should ideally target the initial mutational events. Interventions focused on downstream events are external factors that influence which tumour clones survive Darwinian selection. In Lynch Syndrome, surveillance colonoscopy to remove adenomas may select for carcinogenetic pathways that bypass the adenoma stage.

Impact of aspirin on biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after robot assisted radical prostatectomy in a multicenter retrospective cohort study

This study evaluated the impact of aspirin on the biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in patients. A database search identified patients who underwent RARP for pT2-3N0M0 disease at any of 25 centers between 2011 and 2022, categorized into aspirin (n = 350) and control groups (n = 5857). Adjustment by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and Mahalanobis distance matching (MDM) created 350 matched pairs. The effect of aspirin on the BCR rate was evaluated by analysis of BCR-free survival. After PSM and MDM, the 3-year BCR-free rate was significantly better in the aspirin group (85.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 80.8-89.4) than in the control group (PSM, 74.5%, 95% CI 66.5-83.5, p = 0.021; MDM, 74.7%, 95% CI 66.3-84.3, p = 0.037). In the analysis of high-risk subgroups, patients in the aspirin group with an ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade ≥ 4 had a significantly lower recurrence rate in both matched groups (PSM, hazard ratio 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.88; MDM, hazard ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.23-0.90). In conclusion, this study suggests that aspirin could enhance BCR-free survival post-RARP, especially in patients with higher ISUP grades.

Comparison of PREMM5 and PREMMplus Risk Assessment Models to Identify Lynch Syndrome

PURPOSE

Clinical risk assessment models can identify patients with hereditary cancer susceptibility, but it is unknown how multigene cancer syndrome prediction models compare with syndrome-specific models in assessing risk for individual syndromes such as Lynch syndrome (LS). Our aim was to compare PREMMplus (a 19-gene cancer risk prediction model) with PREMM5 (a LS gene-specific model) for LS identification.

METHODS

We analyzed data from two cohorts of patients undergoing germline testing from a commercial laboratory (n = 12,020) and genetics clinic (n = 6,232) with personal and/or family histories of LS-associated cancer. Individual PREMMplus and PREMM5 scores were calculated for all patients. Using a score cutoff of ≥ 2.5%, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) for identifying LS with each model. Overall ability to discriminate LS carriers from noncarriers was measured using receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-AUC.

RESULTS

PREMMplus had higher sensitivity than PREMM5 in the laboratory- (63.7% [95% CI, 57.0 to 70.0] v 89.2% [95% CI, 84.4 to 93.0]) and clinic-based cohorts (60.8% [95% CI, 52.7 to 68.4] v 90.5% [95% CI, 84.8 to 94.6]). NPV was ≥98.8% for both models in both cohorts. PREMM5 had superior discriminatory capacity to PREMMplus in the laboratory- (ROC-AUC, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.77 to 0.84] v 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.75]) and clinic-based cohorts (ROC-AUC, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.84] v 0.68 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.73]).

CONCLUSION

Both PREMM5 and PREMMplus demonstrated high NPVs (>98%) in LS discrimination across all patient cohorts, and both models may be used to identify individuals at risk of LS. The choice of which model to use can be based on the goals of risk assessment and patient population.

Improved survival of advanced melanoma patients receiving immunotherapy with concomitant antithrombotic therapy - A multicenter study on 2419 patients from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg

BACKGROUND

Cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized melanoma treatment, but the high number of non-responders still emphasizes the need for improvement of therapy. One potential avenue for enhancing anti-tumor treatment is through the modulation of coagulation and platelet activity. Both have been found to play an important role in the tumor microenvironment, tumor growth and metastasis. Preclinical studies indicate a beneficial effect, clinical data has been inconsistent.

METHODS

We examined a cohort of advanced, non-resectable melanoma patients (n = 2419) derived from the German prospective multicenter skin cancer registry ADOReg, who were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The patients were classified based on whether it was documented that they received platelet aggregation inhibition (PAI) (n = 137) (acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) or clopidogrel), anticoagulation (AC) (n = 185) (direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC), phenprocoumon, heparins) at the start of ICI or no antithrombotic medication (n = 2097) at any point during ICI treatment. The study endpoints were best overall response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A significantly improved PFS was observed in patients documented to receive ASA (15.1 vs 6.4 months, HR 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.5 to 0.88, p = 0.0047) as well as in patients to receive AC (15.1 vs. 6.4 months, HR 0.7, 95 % CI: 0.53 to 0.91, p = 0.01) compared to patients for whom no antithrombotic medication was documented. Multivariate analysis of OS showed significant risk reduction in patients who received DOAC (HR 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.49 to 0.92, p = 0.0170) or phenprocoumon (HR: 0.44, 95 % CI: 0.19 to 0.85, p = 0.0301).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates a positive prognostic effect of anticoagulant and antiplatelet concomitant medication in melanoma patients receiving ICI. Further studies are needed to confrim the cancer-related benefit of adding anticoagulation or platelet inhibition to ICI treatment.

Factors influencing the colorectal surveillance adherence in Lynch Syndrome: A retrospective monocentric study

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome (LS), an autosomal dominant disorder resulting from germline pathogenic variants in DNA mismatch repair genes, poses an elevated risk of developing different types of cancer, particularly colorectal and endometrial. Early identification of LS individuals is vital for implementing preventive measures. This study aims to assess the adherence rate of LS individuals to colorectal surveillance and identify influencing factors.

METHODS

Data from the Hereditary Digestive Tumors Registry at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan from 1995 to 2018 were analyzed. The study included 397 LS patients, as categorized based on adherence to surveillance. Statistical analyses, including multivariable logistic regression, were employed to identify factors influencing adherence.

RESULTS

Out of 397 LS patients, 305 (76.8%) completed surveillance, and 92 (23.2%) were lost during surveillance. Fifty-two patients developed colorectal cancer during the surveillance: 34 among patients who completed the surveillance and 18 among those who did not (p<0.036). Factors positively influencing adherence included genetic counseling and higher education, while the distance from the referral center had a negative impact. The survival rate was 83.5% at 240-months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study emphasizes the importance of adhering to a regular colorectal surveillance program for LS individuals. Genetic counseling and higher education emerged as a crucial factor positively affecting adherence. The negative impact was observed for geographical distance from the referral center.

Genomic Medicine in the Developing World: Cancer Spectrum, Cumulative Risk and Survival Outcomes for Lynch Syndrome Variant Heterozygotes with Germline Pathogenic Variants in the MLH1 and MSH2 Genes

Background: Although genetic testing has improved our ability to diagnose Lynch syndrome (LS), there is still limited information on the extent of variations in the clinical and genetic landscape among LS variant heterozygotes (LSVH) in Africa. We sought to investigate the cancer spectrum, cumulative risk, and survival outcomes of LSVH with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes using a LS registry in South Africa over the last 30 years. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to retrieve demographic, clinical, and genetic data of all LSVH with P/LPVs in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes from our LS registry. Genetic data were analyzed according to cancer spectrum, cumulative risk, and crude survival. We used the Chi-squared and t-test to assess differences between groups, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to analyze the cumulative risk and crude survival outcomes. A p-value < 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant. Results: We analyzed a total of 577 LSVH from 109 families. About 450 (78%) and 127 (22%) LSVH harbored a disease-causing mutation in MLH1 and MSH2, respectively. A South African founder PV (MLH1:c.1528C>T) accounted for 74% (n = 426) of all LSVH. CRC was the most common diagnosed cancer in both MLH1 and MSH2 LSVH. MLH1 LSVH had a younger age at cancer diagnosis than MSH2 LSVH (43 vs. 47 years, respectively, p = 0.015). Extracolonic cancers were predominantly higher in female LSVH (n = 33, 35%) than in male LSVH (n = 8, 7%) with the MLH1:c.1528C>T founder PV. The cumulative risk of any cancer and CRC at any age was higher in MLH1 LSVH than in MSH2 LSVH (p = 0.020 and p = 0.036, respectively). LSVH with the MLH1:c.1528C>T PV had a better 10-year overall survival after the first cancer diagnosis, particularly for CRC. Conclusions: LSVH with P/LPVs in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes exhibited significant gene- and sex-specific differences in cancer spectrum, cumulative risk and survival outcomes. Cancer risk and survival estimates described in this study can be used to guide surveillance and genetic counselling for LSVH in our population.

Pathway Polygenic Risk Scores (pPRS) for the Analysis of Gene-environment Interaction

A polygenic risk score (PRS) is used to quantify the combined disease risk of many genetic variants. For complex human traits there is interest in determining whether the PRS modifies, i.e. interacts with, important environmental (E) risk factors. Detection of a PRS by environment (PRS × E) interaction may provide clues to underlying biology and can be useful in developing targeted prevention strategies for modifiable risk factors. The standard PRS may include a subset of variants that interact with E but a much larger subset of variants that affect disease without regard to E. This latter subset will 'water down' the underlying signal in former subset, leading to reduced power to detect PRS × E interaction. We explore the use of pathway-defined PRS (pPRS) scores, using state of the art tools to annotate subsets of variants to genomic pathways. We demonstrate via simulation that testing targeted pPRS × E interaction can yield substantially greater power than testing overall PRS × E interaction. We also analyze a large study (N=78,253) of colorectal cancer (CRC) where E = non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), a well-established protective exposure. While no evidence of overall PRS × NSAIDs interaction (p=0.41) is observed, a significant pPRS × NSAIDs interaction (p=0.0003) is identified based on SNPs within the TGF-β / gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor (GRHR) pathway. NSAIDS is protective (OR=0.84) for those at the 5th percentile of the TGF-β/GRHR pPRS (low genetic risk, OR), but significantly more protective (OR=0.70) for those at the 95th percentile (high genetic risk). From a biological perspective, this suggests that NSAIDs may act to reduce CRC risk specifically through genes in these pathways. From a population health perspective, our result suggests that focusing on genes within these pathways may be effective at identifying those for whom NSAIDs-based CRC-prevention efforts may be most effective.

Gynecological Insights into Lynch Syndrome-A Comprehensive Review of Cancer Screening and Prevention

Lynch syndrome, one of the most common genetic syndromes predisposing to cancer, is associated with a series of malignant conditions, among which the most frequent is colorectal cancer, but gynecologic cancers (especially endometrial) are also quite common. Despite the significant progress made in understanding this condition over time, there are still aspects in managing this condition that have not demonstrated clear benefits. This article aims to summarize the recommendations of international societies and present the latest developments in managing Lynch syndrome, focusing on gynecologic cancer screening and possible prevention strategies. Advances in genetic testing procedures and discoveries related to the association between oncological pathology frequency and the affected pathogenic variant type will probably lead to personalized medicine focused on the individual patient in the coming years. Although various screening methods for gynecological cancers in patients with Lynch syndrome have been used over time, they have not shown significant survival benefits. This highlights the need for studying and implementing new screening and diagnostic methods, which have been under investigation in recent years and are mentioned in this article.

Improving Lynch syndrome detection: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial

INTRODUCTION

Translating evidence-based practices into real-world healthcare settings is challenging, particularly in the rapidly evolving field of genomics. A pragmatic two-arm cluster-randomized clinical trial (Hide and Seek Project - HaSP) tested two implementation approaches for improving hereditary cancer referral practices with one key distinction: implementation strategies that were designed 1) explicitly using psychological theory, or 2) using healthcare professional intuition. This mixed-methods process evaluation aimed to provide insights into how and why change occurred by examining contextual determinants, identifying mechanisms of action, and exploring the role of theory.

METHODS

Post-implementation interviews were conducted with Implementation Leads and clinicians from participating HaSP sites. Transcripts were analysed using a mixed inductive and deductive approach, guided by the updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (2.0). Findings were triangulated with other HaSP process evaluation data sources, including HaSP focus group observations, HaSP research team focus groups, MDT observations, and Implementation Lead project logs. Logic models and case studies were developed to articulate causal processes underlying strategy effectiveness and conditions necessary for implementation success.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants from seven HaSP sites were interviewed. Qualitative analysis identified themes related to Lynch syndrome complexity, pandemic disruptions, operational challenges, information technology constraints, multidisciplinary collaboration, cultural determinants, attitudes towards change, the value of theory, adaptations, and implementation support. Within these themes, a total of 39 contextual determinants were identified, with barriers and facilitators spanning 18 CFIR constructs across five domains. Logic models and case studies highlighted a number of mechanisms of action, producing variable clinical outcomes. Process evaluation findings, interpreted together with HaSP trial outcomes, indicate that theory-based implementation strategies may better support Lynch syndrome detection practices compared to intuition-based strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The information gained from this process evaluation deepens understanding of the factors influencing the success of hospital-specific implementation strategies within the HaSP framework. Potential pathways for optimising the effectiveness of the overall HaSP implementation approach have been identified.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12618001072202. Registered 27 June 2018, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=375348&isReview=true .

Lay and general practitioner attitudes towards endometrial cancer prevention: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Effective and targeted endometrial cancer prevention strategies could reduce diagnoses by 60%. Whether this approach is acceptable to individuals and general practitioners (GPs) is currently unknown. This study sought to determine attitudes towards the provision of personalised endometrial cancer risk assessments and the acceptability of potential prevention strategies.

METHODS

Specific online questionnaires were developed for individuals aged 45-60 years with a uterus and UK-practising GPs, with social media, charity websites, and email used to advertise the study. Individuals completed the questionnaires between February and April 2022.

RESULTS

Of 660 lay questionnaire respondents, 90.3% (n = 596) thought that undergoing an endometrial cancer risk assessment was a good or very good idea and 95.6% (n = 631) would be willing to undergo such an assessment. The commonest reasons for wanting to participate were "to try and reduce my risk" (n = 442, 67.0%), "to be informed" (n = 354, 53.6%), and "it could save my life' (n = 315, 47.7%). Over 80% of respondents would make lifestyle changes to reduce their endometrial cancer risk (n = 550), with half accepting a pill, Mirena, or hysterectomy for primary prevention. GPs were similarly engaged, with 93.0% (n = 106) willing to offer an endometrial cancer risk assessment if a tool were available, potentially during a Well Woman screen.

CONCLUSION

Personalised endometrial cancer risk assessments are acceptable to potentially eligible individuals and GPs and could be accommodated within routine practice. Clinical trials to determine the effectiveness of lifestyle modification and Mirena for endometrial protection are urgently required and should be targeted at those at greatest disease risk.

ERN GENTURIS guidelines on constitutional mismatch repair deficiency diagnosis, genetic counselling, surveillance, quality of life, and clinical management

Constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD), first described 25 years ago, confers an extremely high and lifelong cancer risk, including haematologic, brain, and gastrointestinal tract malignancies, and is associated with several non-neoplastic features. Our understanding of this condition has improved and novel assays to assist CMMRD diagnosis have been developed. Surveillance protocols need adjustment taking into account recent observational prospective studies assessing their effectiveness. Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors and the effectiveness and toxicity of other treatments have been described. An update and merging of the different guidelines on diagnosis and clinical management of CMMRD into one comprehensive guideline was needed. Seventy-two expert members of the European Reference Network GENTURIS and/or the European care for CMMRD consortium and one patient representative developed recommendations for CMMRD diagnosis, genetic counselling, surveillance, quality of life, and clinical management based on a systematic literature search and comprehensive literature review and a modified Delphi process. Recommendations for the diagnosis of CMMRD provide testing criteria, propose strategies for CMMRD testing, and define CMMRD diagnostic criteria. Recommendations for surveillance cover each CMMRD-associated tumour type and contain information on starting age, frequency, and surveillance modality. Recommendations for clinical management cover cancer treatment, management of benign tumours or non-neoplastic features, and chemoprevention. Recommendations also address genetic counselling and quality of life. Based on existing guidelines and currently available data, we present 82 recommendations to improve and standardise the care of CMMRD patients in Europe. These recommendations are not meant to be prescriptive and may be adjusted based on individual decisions.

Detection of Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancer: Assessment of IHC, Fragment Length Analysis, and Amplicon Sequencing Based MSI Testing

Background/Objectives: Mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency can be indicative of Lynch syndrome (LS) and guide treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Colorectal cancers (CRCs) and endometrial cancers (ECs) are routinely screened to identify LS, primarily using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, but concordance between these methods is variable in ECs. Here, we investigate this variability in 361 ECs from the Ohio OCCPI/OPTEC (n = 196) and Manchester PETALS (n = 165) trials, where concordance between assays differed significantly. Methods: Samples were re-tested using the amplicon-sequencing-based Newcastle MSI assay (NCL_MSI), and analysed with respect to existing IHC, MSI and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation data. Results: NCL_MSI showed consistency with the Ohio results (94% and 97% concordance with IHC and original MSI assays, respectively) and increased concordance within the Manchester cohort from 78% to 86% (MSI) and 84% (IHC). Among discordant Manchester samples, NCL_MSI was significantly associated with MLH1 promoter methylation status (p = 0.0028) and had the highest concordance with methylation, (62/69 samples, 90%), indicating utility as a screening tool in this tumour type. However, tumours with germline MSH6 defects were only detected efficiently with IHC; seven out of eight LS tumours classified as MSS by either MSI assay had isolated MSH6 loss, compared to four out of twelve classified as MSI-H by both (p = 0.028). Furthermore, reduced MSI signal was observed in tumours with isolated MSH6 loss (p = 0.009 Ohio, p = 6.2 × 10-5 Manchester) and in both ECs and CRCs with germline defects, although this only reached significance in CRCs (p = 0.002). Conclusions: These results provide further evidence that ECs with MSH6 loss in particular and LS tumours in general have an attenuated MSI signal, providing support for current guidelines specifically recommending IHC for LS detection and immune checkpoint therapy assessment in EC.

Lynch syndrome diagnostic testing pathways in endometrial cancers: a nationwide English registry-based study

BACKGROUND

For female patients with Lynch syndrome (LS), endometrial cancer (EC) is often their first cancer diagnosis. A testing pathway of somatic tumour testing triage followed by germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene testing is an effective way of identifying the estimated 3% of EC caused by LS.

METHODS

A retrospective national population-based observational study was conducted using comprehensive national data collections of functional, somatic and germline MMR tests available via the English National Cancer Registration Dataset. For all EC diagnosed in 2019, the proportion tested, median time to test, yield of abnormal results and factors influencing testing pathway initiation were examined.

RESULTS

There was an immunohistochemistry (IHC) or microsatellite instability (MSI) test recorded for 17.8% (1408/7928) of patients diagnosed with EC in 2019. Proportions tested varied by Cancer Alliance and age. There was an MLH1 promoter hypermethylation test recorded for 43.1% (149/346) of patients with MLH1 protein IHC loss or MSI. Of patients with EC eligible from tumour-testing, 25% (26/104) had a germline MMR test recorded. Median time from cancer diagnosis to germline MMR test was 315 days (IQR 222-486).

CONCLUSION

This analysis highlights the regional variation in recorded testing, patient attrition, delays and missed opportunities to diagnose LS, providing an informative baseline for measuring the impact of the national guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence on universal reflex LS testing in EC, implemented in 2020.

Mainstreaming cancer genetics: feasibility of an advanced nurse practitioner-led service diagnosing Lynch syndrome from colorectal cancer in Ireland

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common cancer in Ireland. Of all CRCs, 2-4% are attributable to Lynch Syndrome (LS), the most common CRC predisposition syndrome. LS is caused by constitutional pathogenic variants (PVs) affecting mismatch repair (MMR) genes with resultant MMR protein deficiency (dMMR). Screening of all CRCs with MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing is advocated to increase the detection of LS. However, successful implementation requires appropriate downstream management. In Ireland the traditional pathway involves referral to cancer genetics services to assess eligibility for genetic testing. Cancer genetics services in Ireland face many challenges in providing uniform access to timely healthcare with current wait times for assessment in excess of 1 year. An increasingly adopted pathway is that of mainstreaming, whereby genetic testing is managed locally by a multidisciplinary team member. Our institution therefore implemented an Advanced Nurse Practitioner (ANP)-led service with responsibility for the LS Diagnostic Pathway and mainstream genetic testing. Data was extracted from a prospectively maintained database of all newly diagnosed CRC patients discussed at our institutions CRC multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) between January 1st, 2023, and May 31st, 2024. MMR IHC testing was performed in 97.9% of the 385 patients diagnosed with CRC. The median time from histological confirmation of CRC to the availability of the MMR IHC report was 6 days. All 51 patients (100%) who required sequential tumor testing underwent BRAF V600 ± MLH1 promoter methylation testing. Additionally, 100% of the 14 patients eligible for mainstream genetic testing were referred to the ANP-led genetics service. The median time from the initial MDM discussion to the initiation of genetic testing was 69 days, while the median time from testing to the availability of results was 19 days. Patients received their results within a median of 21 days. MMR IHC testing increases the detection of LS through identification of dMMR tumours. Successful downstream delivery of clinical services, however, requires appropriate subsequent management, in a resource-limited environment. Our institutional experience demonstrates the feasibility, efficiency, and effectiveness of an ANP-led mainstreaming model of care for hereditary colorectal cancer.

Colonoscopic surveillance in Lynch syndrome: guidelines in perspective

Lynch syndrome predisposes to a high risk of colorectal cancer and colonoscopy remains the primary preventive strategy. The prevention of colorectal cancer through colonoscopy relies on identifying and removing adenomas, the main precursor lesion. Nevertheless, colonoscopy is not an optimal strategy since post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer remains an important issue. In continuation of a 2021 journal review, the present article seeks to offer an updated perspective by examining relevant articles from the past 3 years. We place recent findings in the context of existing guidelines, with a specific focus on colonoscopy surveillance. Key aspects explored include colonoscopy quality standards, timing of initiation, and surveillance intervals. Our review provides a comprehensive analysis of adenoma-related insights in Lynch syndrome, delving into emerging technologies like virtual chromoendoscopy and artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy. This review aims to contribute valuable insights into the topic of colonoscopy surveillance in Lynch syndrome.

Targeting the gut microbiota: a new strategy for colorectal cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

How to reduce the high incidence rate and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) effectively is the focus of current research. Endoscopic treatment of early-stage CRC and colorectal adenomas (CAC) has a high success rate, but although several treatments are available for advanced CRC, such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, the 5-year survival rate remains low. In view of the high incidence rate and mortality of CRC, early rational drug prevention for high-risk groups and exploration of alternative treatment modalities are particularly warranted. Gut microbiota is the target of and interacts with probiotics, prebiotics, aspirin, metformin, and various Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) for the prevention of CRC. In addition, the anti-cancer mechanisms of probiotics differ widely among bacterial strains, and both bacterial strains and their derivatives and metabolites have been found to have anti-cancer effects. Gut microbiota plays a significant role in early drug prevention of CRC and treatment of CRC in its middle and late stages, targeting gut microbiota may be a new strategy for colorectal cancer treatment.

Uptake of Aspirin Chemoprevention in Patients With Lynch Syndrome

PURPOSE

Individuals with Lynch syndrome (LS) are at a high lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and other cancers. Aspirin (ASA), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), has proven chemopreventive benefits in LS, with the CAPP2 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrating a 60% relative risk reduction for CRC among participants who adhered to ASA for 2 years or more. This study sought to characterize uptake of ASA/NSAIDs among individuals with LS and to understand factors associated with use.

METHODS

Individuals with LS were invited (June 2020-August 2022) to complete a one-time electronic survey about LS screening behaviors, uptake of ASA/NSAIDs, and current/emerging cancer prevention options. Participants were recruited from the Fox Chase Cancer Center (FCCC) Risk Assessment Program Registry and through a research invitation posted to two patient-facing LS advocacy websites.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ninety-six participants completed the survey including 116 (39.2%) from FCCC and 180 (60.8%) recruited via the Internet, including 14.9% non-US based individuals. Uptake of regular ASA or NSAIDs was modest at 34.8% and was even lower (25.7%) when focusing on individuals taking ASA or NSAIDs solely for chemoprevention of LS. More than half (55%) were taking <100 mg ASA daily. In multivariable modeling, lower perceived threat of LS (odds ratio [OR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98]), lower concern for side effects (OR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.99]), and higher likelihood of recommending ASA/NSAIDs to family or a friend were all associated with ASA/NSAIDs use (OR, 1.70 [95% CI, 1.37 to 2.10]).

CONCLUSION

Uptake of ASA/NSAIDs chemoprevention is modest among individuals with LS. Patient perceptions of the pros and cons of ASA, more so than demographic and disease-related factors, were associated with chemoprevention uptake.

Exploring Aspirin's Potential in Cancer Prevention: A Comprehensive Review of the Current Evidence

Aspirin, traditionally recognized for its analgesic, anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and antiplatelet effects, has recently attracted attention for its potential role in cancer prevention. Initially studied for cardiovascular disease prevention, emerging evidence suggests that aspirin may reduce the risk of certain cancers, particularly colorectal cancer (CRC). This narrative review integrates findings from early studies, animal models, epidemiological data, and clinical trials to evaluate aspirin's efficacy as a chemopreventive agent. Aspirin's anticancer effects are primarily attributed to its cyclooxygenase (COX) enzyme inhibition, which decreases prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels and disrupts cancer-related signaling pathways. While epidemiological studies support an association between aspirin use and reduced cancer incidence and mortality, especially for CRC and potentially for breast (BC) and prostate cancers (PCa), the risk of adverse effects, such as gastrointestinal (GI) and intracranial bleeding, complicates its use and warrants careful consideration. The decision to use aspirin for cancer prevention should be individualized, balancing its therapeutic benefits against potential adverse effects. It also underscores the necessity for further research to refine dosage guidelines, assess long-term impacts, and explore additional biomarkers to guide personalized cancer prevention strategies.

Reproductive decision-making in cancer susceptibility syndromes

Cancer susceptibility syndromes confer an increased lifetime risk of cancer and occur due to germline likely-pathogenic or pathogenic variants in a cancer susceptibility gene. Clinical Genetics services advise patients of ways to manage their future cancer risks, often prefaced with uncertainties due to poor understandings of individualised risk. For individuals/couples whose future offspring are at risk of a cancer susceptibility syndrome, different options are available depending on their preferences and circumstances, including prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic testing. This review provides an overview of the most common cancer susceptibility syndromes, available reproductive options and a genetic counselling framework recommended to support individuals/couples in their decision-making. We describe complexities of decision-making involving moderate penetrance and sex-specific variable penetrance genes and explore associated ethical issues arising in this complex area of medicine.

High Probability of Lynch Syndrome Among Colorectal Cancer Patients Is Associated With Higher Occurrence of KRAS and PIK3CA Mutations

Background

In Indonesia, early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) rates are higher in patients < 50 years old compared to Western populations, possibly due to a higher frequency of Lynch syndrome (LS) in CRC patients. We aimed to examine the association of KRAS and PIK3CA mutations with LS.

Methods

In this retrospective cross-sectional single-center study, the PCR-HRM-based test was used for screening of microsatellite instability (MSI) mononucleotide markers (BAT25, BAT26, BCAT25, MYB, EWSR1), MLH1 promoter methylation, and oncogene mutations of BRAF (V600E), KRAS (exon 2 and 3), and PIK3CA (exon 9 and 20) in FFPE DNA samples.

Results

All the samples (n = 244) were from Dr. Sardjito General Hospital Yogyakarta, Indonesia. KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were found in 151/244 (61.88%) and 107/244 (43.85%) of samples, respectively. KRAS and PIK3CA mutations were significantly associated with MSI status in 32/42 (76.19%) and 25/42 (59.52%) of samples, respectively. KRAS mutation was significantly associated with LS status in 26/32 (81.25%) of samples. The PIK3CA mutation was present in a higher proportion in LS samples of 19/32 (59.38%), but not statistically significant. Clinicopathology showed that KRAS mutation was significantly associated with right-sided CRC and higher histology grade in 39/151 (25.83%) and 24/151 (16.44%) samples, respectively. PIK3CA mutation was significantly associated with female sex and lower levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in 62/107 (57.94%) and 26/107 (30.23%) samples, respectively. KRAS and PIK3CA mutations did not significantly affect overall survival (120 months) in LS and non-LS patients.

Conclusions

The high probability of LS in Indonesian CRC patients is associated with KRAS and PIK3CA mutations.

Gastrointestinal Cancer Precursor Conditions and Their Detection

Gastrointestinal cancers are a leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality. Many gastrointestinal cancers develop from cancer precursor lesions, which are commonly found in individuals with hereditary cancer syndromes. Hereditary cancer syndromes have advanced our understanding of cancer development and progression and have facilitated the evaluation of cancer prevention and interception efforts. Common gastrointestinal hereditary cancer syndromes, including their organ-specific cancer risk and surveillance recommendations, are reviewed in this article. The management of common gastroesophageal, pancreatic, and colonic precursor lesions is also discussed, regardless of their genetic background. Further research is needed to advance chemoprevention and immunoprevention strategies.

Unlocking the Potential: Caloric Restriction, Caloric Restriction Mimetics, and Their Impact on Cancer Prevention and Treatment

Caloric restriction (CR) and its related alternatives have been shown to be the only interventions capable of extending lifespan and decreasing the risk of cancer, along with a reduction in burden in pre-clinical trials. Nevertheless, the results from clinical trials have not been as conclusive as the pre-clinical results. Recognizing the challenges associated with long-term fasting, the application of caloric restriction mimetics (CRMs), pharmacological agents that mimic the molecular effects of CR, to harness the potential benefits while overcoming the practical limitations of fasting has resulted in an interesting alternative. This review synthesizes the findings of diverse clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of CR and CRMs. In dietary interventions, a fast-mimicking diet was the most tolerated to reduce tumoral growth markers and chemotherapy side effects. CRMs were well tolerated, and metformin and aspirin showed the most promising effect in reducing cancer risk in a selected group of patients. The application of CR and/or CRMs shows promising effects in anti-cancer therapy; however, there is a need for more evidence to safely include these interventions in standard-of-care therapies.

Colonoscopy and Upper Endoscopy Surveillance in Lynch Syndrome: A Longitudinal Study From a Large Tertiary Healthcare System

Background and Aims

Lynch syndrome (LS) is caused by pathogenic mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. There are limited data on differences in colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance by MMR genes, and an international consensus on surveillance based on genes is not established. We aimed to evaluate colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) surveillance outcomes and compare CRC surveillance findings by the mutated gene.

Methods

One hundred one patients with LS were included and colonoscopy results were compared by MMR mutation. Primary outcomes included the development and recurrence of adenoma, CRC, high-grade dysplasia, advanced adenoma, and sessile serrated lesions. Logistic regressions evaluated the relationship between genes and the development or recurrence of primary outcomes. Survival analysis evaluated primary outcomes in patients with ≥ 2 colonoscopies. EGD results were summarized.

Results

Three hundred twenty seven colonoscopies were reviewed. Compared to PMS2, MLH1 was associated with a higher risk of advanced adenoma/high-grade dysplasia/CRC development (odds ratio [OR] 9.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.97-77.24) and MSH2 was associated with a higher risk of adenoma development (OR 4.17, 95% CI: 1.11-17.61). Among those with > 2 colonoscopies, MLH1 (hazard ratio 18.98, 95% CI: 1.31-274.51) and MSH6 (hazard ratio 15.03, 95% CI: 1.16-194.65) had a higher risk of sessile serrated lesions compared to MSH2. Among patients who had adenoma detected once, MLH1 had a higher risk of adenoma recurrence compared to MSH6 (OR 14.59, 95% CI: 1.53-244.30) and PMS2 (OR 47.15, 95% CI: 4.26-984.28). MSH2 had a higher risk of adenoma recurrence compared to PMS2 (OR 11.89, 95% CI: 1.38-164.78). Of 170 EGDs, an actionable finding was identified in 16% of patients during their first 3 EGDs.

Conclusion

Surveillance colonoscopy outcomes differed in patients with LS and suggest the need to guide surveillance based on MMR gene mutation.

[Lynch syndrome]

Patients with Lynch syndrome, one of the most common hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes, harbor an increased risk for a broad spectrum of especially gastrointestinal and gynecological tumors. Causative for the syndrome are variants in DNA mismatch repair genes, which are passed on to the offspring at a 50% chance (autosomal dominant inheritance). The tumor tissue of these patients usually shows microsatellite instability, which is of increasing relevance regarding prognosis and therapeutic decisions. The detection of a causative genetic variant in a patient enables predictive testing of family members to provide relief to noncarriers and provide carriers with intensified risk-adapted surveillance. In addition, chemoprevention with aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has been proven useful for chemoprevention in studies. Therefore, the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome is important for patients and their relatives.

A novel colorectal cancer test combining microsatellite instability and BRAF/RAS analysis: Clinical validation and impact on Lynch syndrome screening

Background

Lynch syndrome (LS) is under-diagnosed. UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines recommend multistep molecular testing of all colorectal cancers (CRCs) to screen for LS. However, the complexity of the pathway has resulted in limited improvement in diagnosis.

Methods

One-step multiplex PCR was used to generate sequencing-ready amplicons from 14 microsatellite instability (MSI) markers and 22 BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS mutation hotspots. MSI and BRAF/RAS variants were detected using amplicon-sequencing and automated analysis. The assay was clinically validated and deployed into service in northern England, followed by regional and local audits to assess its impact.

Results

MSI analysis achieved 99.1% sensitivity and 99.2% specificity and was reproducible (r = 0.995). Mutation hotspot analysis had 100% sensitivity, 99.9% specificity, and was reproducible (r = 0.998). Assay-use in service in 2022-2023 increased CRC testing (97.2% (2466/2536) versus 28.6% (601/2104)), halved turnaround times, and identified more CRC patients at-risk of LS (5.5% (139/2536) versus 2.9% (61/2104)) compared to 2019-2020 when a multi-test pathway was used.

Conclusion

A novel amplicon-sequencing assay of CRCs, including all biomarkers for LS screening and anti-EGFR therapy, achieved >95% testing rate. Adoption of this low cost, scalable, and fully automatable test will complement on-going, national initiatives to improve LS screening.

Treatment of Microsatellite-Unstable Rectal Cancer in Sporadic and Hereditary Settings

Microsatellite instability is rare in rectal cancer and associated with younger age of onset and Lynch syndrome. All rectal cancers should be tested for microsatellite instability prior to treatment decisions. Patients with microsatellite instability are relatively resistant to chemotherapy. However, recent small studies have shown dramatic response with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Patients with Lynch syndrome have a hereditary predisposition to cancer and thus an elevated risk of metachronous cancer. Therefore, while "watch and wait" is a well-established practice for sporadic rectal cancers that obtain a complete clinical response after chemoradiation, its safety in patients with Lynch syndrome has not yet been defined. The extent of surgery for patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer is controversial and there is significant debate as to the relative advantages of a segmental proctectomy with postoperative endoscopic surveillance versus a therapeutic and prophylactic total proctocolectomy. Surgical decision making for the patient with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer is complex and demands a multidisciplinary approach, taking into account both patient- and tumor-specific factors. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy show great promise in the treatment of these patients, and further maturation of data from prospective trials will likely change the current treatment paradigm. Patients with Lynch syndrome and rectal cancer who do not undergo total proctocolectomy require yearly surveillance colonoscopies and should consider chemoprophylaxis with aspirin.

Modifiable risk factors for cancer among people with lynch syndrome: an international, cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary colorectal and endometrial cancer. Lifestyle modification may provide an opportunity for adjunctive cancer prevention. In this study, we aimed to characterise modifiable risk factors in people with Lynch syndrome and compare this with international guidelines for cancer prevention.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out utilizing survey methodology. Following public and patient involvement, the survey was disseminated through patient advocacy groups and by social media. Self-reported demographic and health behaviours were collected in April 2023. Guidelines from the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) were used to compare percentage adherence to 9 lifestyle recommendations, including diet, physical activity, weight, and alcohol intake. Median adherence scores, as a surrogate for lifestyle risk, were calculated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

156 individuals with Lynch syndrome participated from 13 countries. The median age was 51, and 54% were cancer survivors. The mean BMI was 26.7 and the mean weekly duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity was 90 min. Median weekly consumption of ethanol was 60 g, and 3% reported current smoking. Adherence to WCRF recommendations for cancer prevention ranged from 9 to 73%, with all but one recommendation having < 50% adherence. The median adherence score was 2.5 out of 7. There was no significant association between median adherence scores and age (p = 0.27), sex (p = 0.31), or cancer history (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

We have characterised the modifiable risk profile of people living with Lynch syndrome, outlining targets for intervention based on lifestyle guidelines for the general population. As evidence supporting the relevance of modifiable factors in Lynch syndrome emerges, behavioural modification may prove an impactful means of cancer prevention.

Role and recent progress of P2Y12 receptor in cancer development

P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12R) is an adenosine-activated G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays a central role in platelet function, hemostasis, and thrombosis. P2Y12R activation can promote platelet aggregation and adhesion to cancer cells, promote tumor angiogenesis, and affect the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and tumor drug resistance, which is conducive to the progression of cancers. Meanwhile, P2Y12R inhibitors can inhibit this effect, suggesting that P2Y12R may be a potential therapeutic target for cancer. P2Y12R is involved in cancer development and metastasis, while P2Y12R inhibitors are effective in inhibiting cancer. However, a new study suggests that long-term use of P2Y12R inhibitors may increase the risk of cancer and the mechanism remains to be explored. In this paper, we reviewed the structural and functional characteristics of P2Y12R and its role in cancer. We explored the role of P2Y12R inhibitors in different tumors and the latest advances by summarizing the basic and clinical studies on the effects of P2Y12R inhibitors on tumors.

Circulating miRNA Signature Predicts Cancer Incidence in Lynch Syndrome-A Pilot Study

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common autosomal dominant cancer syndrome and is characterized by high genetic cancer risk modified by lifestyle factors. This study explored whether a circulating miRNA (c-miR) signature predicts LS cancer incidence within a 4-year prospective surveillance period. To gain insight how lifestyle behavior could affect LS cancer risk, we investigated whether the cancer-predicting c-miR signature correlates with known risk-reducing factors such as physical activity, body mass index (BMI), dietary fiber, or NSAID usage. The study included 110 c-miR samples from LS carriers, 18 of whom were diagnosed with cancer during a 4-year prospective surveillance period. Lasso regression was utilized to find c-miRs associated with cancer risk. Individual risk sum derived from the chosen c-miRs was used to develop a model to predict LS cancer incidence. This model was validated using 5-fold cross-validation. Correlation and pathway analyses were applied to inspect biological functions of c-miRs. Pearson correlation was used to examine the associations of c-miR risk sum and lifestyle factors. hsa-miR-10b-5p, hsa-miR-125b-5p, hsa-miR-200a-3p, hsa-miR-3613-5p, and hsa-miR-3615 were identified as cancer predictors by Lasso, and their risk sum score associated with higher likelihood of cancer incidence (HR 2.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.64-4.52, C-index = 0.72). In cross-validation, the model indicated good concordance with the average C-index of 0.75 (0.6-1.0). Coregulated hsa-miR-10b-5p, hsa-miR-125b-5p, and hsa-miR-200a-3p targeted genes involved in cancer-associated biological pathways. The c-miR risk sum score correlated with BMI (r = 0.23, P < 0.01). In summary, BMI-associated c-miRs predict LS cancer incidence within 4 years, although further validation is required.

PREVENTION RELEVANCE

The development of cancer risk prediction models is key to improving the survival of patients with LS. This pilot study describes a serum miRNA signature-based risk prediction model that predicts LS cancer incidence within 4 years, although further validation is required.

Novel Cancer Prevention Strategies in Individuals With Hereditary Cancer Syndromes: Focus on BRCA1, BRCA2, and Lynch Syndrome

Germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes confer elevated risks of breast, ovarian, and other cancers. Lynch syndrome (LS) is associated with increased risks of multiple cancer types including colorectal and uterine cancers. Current cancer risk mitigation strategies have focused on pharmacologic risk reduction, enhanced surveillance, and preventive surgeries. While these approaches can be effective, they stand to be improved on because of either limited efficacy or undesirable impact on quality of life. The current review summarizes ongoing investigational efforts in cancer risk prevention strategies for patients with germline PVs in BRCA1, BRCA2, or LS-associated genes. These efforts span radiation, surgery, and pharmacology including vaccine strategies. Understanding the molecular events involved in the premalignant to malignant transformation in high-risk individuals may ultimately contribute significantly to novel prevention strategies.

Aspirin in Patients with Viral Hepatitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a disease demonstrating increasing morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Studies have shown that aspirin can reduce the incidence of liver cancer; however, the degree of benefit in patients with viral hepatitis is unclear. This study focused on the association between aspirin use and HCC risk in patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was performed from the earliest available date to December 16, 2023. The primary outcome was HCC incidence, and the secondary outcome was gastrointestinal bleeding. The results were expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analyses were performed by using random or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity assessed via the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles (303,414 participants and 14,423 HCC patients) were included in the analysis. The incidence of HCC in aspirin users was lower than that in non-aspirin users (HR 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.83; P < 0.001; I2 = 90.0%). Subgroup analysis further showed that this effect may be more obvious in HCV patients, non-cirrhotic patients, patients with statins, and long-term aspirin users, but it may have the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20; P = 0.906; I2 = 0.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis shows that in patients with chronic viral hepatitis, aspirin use is associated with a significantly reduced risk of liver cancer, but attention should be paid to the possible risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, and this conclusion needs further validation in the future.

Two genome-wide interaction loci modify the association of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with colorectal cancer

Regular, long-term aspirin use may act synergistically with genetic variants, particularly those in mechanistically relevant pathways, to confer a protective effect on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. We leveraged pooled data from 52 clinical trial, cohort, and case-control studies that included 30,806 CRC cases and 41,861 controls of European ancestry to conduct a genome-wide interaction scan between regular aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and imputed genetic variants. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, we identified statistically significant interactions between regular aspirin/NSAID use and variants in 6q24.1 (top hit rs72833769), which has evidence of influencing expression of TBC1D7 (a subunit of the TSC1-TSC2 complex, a key regulator of MTOR activity), and variants in 5p13.1 (top hit rs350047), which is associated with expression of PTGER4 (codes a cell surface receptor directly involved in the mode of action of aspirin). Genetic variants with functional impact may modulate the chemopreventive effect of regular aspirin use, and our study identifies putative previously unidentified targets for additional mechanistic interrogation.

Aspirin vs Placebo as Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer: The Alliance A011502 Randomized Trial

Importance

Observational studies of survivors of breast cancer and prospective trials of aspirin for cardiovascular disease suggest improved breast cancer survival among aspirin users, but prospective studies of aspirin to prevent breast cancer recurrence are lacking.

Objective

To determine whether aspirin decreases the risk of invasive cancer events among survivors of breast cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A011502, a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial conducted in the United States and Canada with 3020 participants who had high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer, enrolled participants from 534 sites from January 6, 2017, through December 4, 2020, with follow-up to March 4, 2023.

Interventions

Participants were randomized (stratified for hormone receptor status [positive vs negative], body mass index [≤30 vs >30], stage II vs III, and time since diagnosis [<18 vs ≥18 months]) to receive 300 mg of aspirin (n = 1510) or placebo once daily (n = 1510) for 5 years.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was invasive disease-free survival. Overall survival was a key secondary outcome.

Results

A total of 3020 participants were randomized when the data and safety monitoring committee recommended suspending the study at the first interim analysis because the hazard ratio had crossed the prespecified futility bound. By median follow-up of 33.8 months (range, 0.1-72.6 months), 253 invasive disease-free survival events were observed (141 in the aspirin group and 112 in the placebo group), yielding a hazard ratio of 1.27 (95% CI, 0.99-1.63; P = .06). All invasive disease-free survival events, including death, invasive progression (both distant and locoregional), and new primary events, were numerically higher in the aspirin group, although the differences were not statistically significant. There was no difference in overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.82-1.72). Rates of grades 3 and 4 adverse events were similar in both groups.

Conclusion and Relevance

Among participants with high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer, daily aspirin therapy did not improve risk of breast cancer recurrence or survival in early follow-up. Despite its promise and wide availability, aspirin should not be recommended as an adjuvant breast cancer treatment.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02927249.

Chemoprevention in Inherited Colorectal Cancer Syndromes

Cancer prevention in hereditary gastrointestinal predisposition syndromes relies primarily on intensive screening (e.g., colonoscopy) or prophylactic surgery (e.g., colectomy). The use of chemopreventive agents as an adjunct to these measures has long been studied both in the general population and in hereditary cancer patients, in whom the risk of malignancy, and therefore the potential risk reduction, is considerably greater. However, to date only few compounds have been found to be effective, safe, and tolerable for widespread use. Furthermore, many of the studies involving these rare syndromes suffer from small sample sizes, heterogeneous patient cohorts, short follow-up duration, and lack of standardized endpoints, creating challenges to draw generalizable conclusion regarding efficacy. The following review summarizes the current data on various chemopreventive compounds used in Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis in addition to several agents that are currently being investigated.

Emerge of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome despite colonoscopy surveillance: A challenge of hide and seek

Even with colonoscopy surveillance, Lynch syndromes (LS) carriers still develop colorectal cancer (CRC). The cumulative incidence of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance varies depending on the affected mismatch repair (MMR) gene. However, the precise mechanisms driving these epidemiological patterns remain incompletely understood. In recent years, several potential mechanisms explaining the occurrence of CRCs during colonoscopy surveillance have been proposed in individuals with and without LS. These encompass biological factors like concealed/accelerated carcinogenesis through a bypassed adenoma stage and accelerated progression from adenomas. Alongside these, various colonoscopy-related factors may contribute to formation of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance, like missed yet detectable (pre)cancerous lesions, detected yet incompletely removed (pre)cancerous lesions, and colonoscopy-induced carcinogenesis due to tumor cell reimplantation. In this comprehensive literature update, we reviewed these potential factors and evaluated their relevance to each MMR group in an attempt to raise further awareness and stimulate research regarding this conflicting phenomenon.

Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes Registry: What, How, and Why?

Caring for patients with colorectal cancer inherited cancer syndromes is complex, and it requires a well-thought integration process between a multidisciplinary team, an accessible database, and a registry coordinator. This requires an aligned vision between the administrative business team and the clinical team. Although we can manage most of the cancers that those patients develop according to oncologic guidance, the future risk of patients and their families might add emotional and psychological burdens on them in the absence of a well-qualified and trained team where balancing quality of life and cancer risk are at the essence of decision making.

Identification of people with Lynch syndrome from those presenting with colorectal cancer in England: baseline analysis of the diagnostic pathway

It is believed that >95% of people with Lynch syndrome (LS) remain undiagnosed. Within the National Health Service (NHS) in England, formal guidelines issued in 2017 state that all colorectal cancers (CRC) should be tested for DNA Mismatch Repair deficiency (dMMR). We used a comprehensive population-level national dataset to analyse implementation of the agreed diagnostic pathway at a baseline point 2 years post-publication of official guidelines. Using real-world data collected and curated by the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS), we retrospectively followed up all people diagnosed with CRC in England in 2019. Nationwide laboratory diagnostic data incorporated somatic (tumour) testing for dMMR (via immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability), somatic testing for MLH1 promoter methylation and BRAF status, and constitutional (germline) testing of MMR genes. Only 44% of CRCs were screened for dMMR; these figures varied over four-fold with respect to geography. Of those CRCs identified as dMMR, only 51% underwent subsequent diagnostic testing. Overall, only 1.3% of patients with colorectal cancer had a germline MMR genetic test performed; up to 37% of these tests occurred outside of NICE guidelines. The low rates of molecular diagnostic testing in CRC support the premise that Lynch syndrome is underdiagnosed, with significant attrition at all stages of the testing pathway. Applying our methodology to subsequent years' data will allow ongoing monitoring and analysis of the impact of recent investment. If the diagnostic guidelines were fully implemented, we estimate that up to 700 additional people with LS could be identified each year.

Identifying therapeutic targets for cancer among 2074 circulating proteins and risk of nine cancers

Circulating proteins can reveal key pathways to cancer and identify therapeutic targets for cancer prevention. We investigate 2,074 circulating proteins and risk of nine common cancers (bladder, breast, endometrium, head and neck, lung, ovary, pancreas, kidney, and malignant non-melanoma) using cis protein Mendelian randomisation and colocalization. We conduct additional analyses to identify adverse side-effects of altering risk proteins and map cancer risk proteins to drug targets. Here we find 40 proteins associated with common cancers, such as PLAUR and risk of breast cancer [odds ratio per standard deviation increment: 2.27, 1.88-2.74], and with high-mortality cancers, such as CTRB1 and pancreatic cancer [0.79, 0.73-0.85]. We also identify potential adverse effects of protein-altering interventions to reduce cancer risk, such as hypertension. Additionally, we report 18 proteins associated with cancer risk that map to existing drugs and 15 that are not currently under clinical investigation. In sum, we identify protein-cancer links that improve our understanding of cancer aetiology. We also demonstrate that the wider consequence of any protein-altering intervention on well-being and morbidity is required to interpret any utility of proteins as potential future targets for therapeutic prevention.

Long-term aspirin use and cancer risk: a 20-year cohort study

BACKGROUND

Long-term use of aspirin has been shown to reduce colorectal cancer risk, but the association remains inconclusive for individual noncolorectal cancers. We examined the association between long-term aspirin use and cancer risk in Denmark.

METHODS

Using nationwide registries, we followed individuals aged 40-70 years at baseline (January 1, 1997) for cancer diagnoses through 2018. We assessed low-dose (75-150 mg) aspirin use according to continuity, duration, and cumulative amount. In addition, we explored associations with consistent high-dose (500 mg) aspirin use. Using Cox regression, we estimated multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with aspirin use for overall and site-specific cancer.

RESULTS

Among 1 909 531 individuals, 422 778 were diagnosed with cancer during mean follow-up of 18.2 years. Low-dose aspirin use did not reduce the hazard ratio for cancer overall irrespective of continuity and duration of use (continuous use: HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.06). However, long-term (≥5 or ≥10 years) use was associated with at least 10% reductions in hazard ratios for several cancer sites: colon, rectum, esophagus, stomach, liver, pancreas, small intestine, head and neck, brain tumors, meningioma, melanoma, thyroid, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and leukemia. Substantially elevated hazard ratios were found for lung and bladder cancer. In secondary analyses, consistent high-dose aspirin use was associated with reduced hazard ratios for cancer overall (HR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.93) and for several cancer sites.

CONCLUSION

Long-term low-dose aspirin use was associated with slight to moderately reduced risks for several cancers but not for cancer overall owing to increased risk for some common cancers. Similar or slightly stronger inverse associations were observed for consistent use of high-dose aspirin.

Obesity and Inflammatory Factors in the Progression of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer

Metabolic dysfunction associated with obesity leads to a chronic pro-inflammatory state with systemic effects, including the alteration of macrophage metabolism. Tumor-associated macrophages have been linked to the formation of cancer through the production of metabolites such as itaconate. Itaconate downregulates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma as a tumor-suppressing factor and upregulates anti-inflammatory cytokines in M2-like macrophages. Similarly, leptin and adiponectin also influence macrophage cytokine expression and contribute to the progression of colorectal cancer via changes in gene expression within the PI3K/AKT pathway. This pathway influences cell proliferation, differentiation, and tumorigenesis. This work provides a review of obesity-related hormones and inflammatory mechanisms leading to the development and progression of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC). A literature search was performed using the PubMed and Cochrane databases to identify studies related to obesity and EOCRC, with keywords including 'EOCRC', 'obesity', 'obesity-related hormones', 'itaconate', 'adiponectin', 'leptin', 'M2a macrophage', and 'microbiome'. With this concept of pro-inflammatory markers contributing to EOCRC, increased use of chemo-preventative agents such as aspirin may have a protective effect. Elucidating this association between obesity-related, hormone/cytokine-driven inflammatory effects with EOCRC may help lead to new therapeutic targets in preventing and treating EOCRC.