[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial

Best Patient Care Practices for Administering PSMA-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

Optimal patient management protocols for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are poorly defined and even further complexified with new therapy approvals, such as radiopharmaceuticals. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agent 177Lu vipivotide tetraxetan ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), approved after the phase III VISION study, presents physicians with additional aspects of patient management, including specific adverse event (AE) monitoring and management, as well as radiation safety. Drawing on our experience as VISION study investigators, here we provide guidance on best practices for delivering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) to patients with mCRPC. After a comprehensive review of published evidence and guidelines on RPT management in prostate cancer, we identified educational gaps in managing the radiation safety and AEs associated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Our results showed that providing sufficient education on AEs (e.g., fatigue and dry mouth) and radiation safety principles is key to effective delivery and management of patient expectations. Patient counseling by health care professionals, across disciplines, is a cornerstone of optimal patient management during PSMA-targeted RPT. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial, and physicians must adhere to radiation safety protocols and counsel patients on radiation safety considerations. Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is generally well tolerated; however, additional interventions may be required, such as dosing modification, medications, or transfusions. Urinary incontinence can be challenging in the context of radiation safety. Multidisciplinary collaboration between medical oncologists and nuclear medicine teams ensures that patients are monitored and managed safely and efficiently. In clinical practice, the benefit-to-risk ratio should always be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Negative 18 F-Piflufolastat PET/CT, But Positive 18 F-Fluciclovine PET/CT, in a Patient With Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

ABSTRACT

An 83-year-old man with prostate cancer post external beam radiotherapy presented with biochemical recurrence (PSA, 29.7 ng/mL). PSMA-targeted 18 F-Piflufolastat PET/CT was performed, but no avid lesions were identified. Given the high PSA and high suspicion for recurrence, an 18 F-Fluciclovine PET/CT was performed. Fifteen 18 F-fluciclovine-avid pelvic, abdominal, retrocrural, and left supraclavicular nodal metastases were then identified. Although the majority of prostate cancer metastases are avid on PSMA-targeted PET, some metastases are not. This case demonstrates the ability of metabolic tracers such as 18 F-Fluciclovine PET to localize and quantitate disease extent in a patient whose metastases are not avid on PSMA-targeted PET.

Sequential [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and docetaxel versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (UpFrontPSMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 improves survival and quality of life in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, but whether it confers a benefit in hormone-sensitive disease is unknown. We aimed to evaluate [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 before docetaxel treatment in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

METHODS

UpFrontPSMA was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial done at 11 Australian hospitals. Eligible patients had prostate adenocarcinoma without clinically significant neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell histology, were aged 18 years or older, had less than 4 weeks on androgen deprivation therapy, had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had high-volume PSMA-avid disease on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT with no major discordance on 2-[18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-CT. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the experimental treatment ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed 6 weeks later by docetaxel) or standard-of-care treatment (docetaxel alone) using computer-based block randomisation with random block sizes, stratified by disease volume by conventional imaging and duration of androgen deprivation therapy at the time of registration. Neither patients nor investigators were masked to treatment assignment. Patients in the experimental group received two cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 7·5 GBq every 6 weeks intravenously, followed 6 weeks later by six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks intravenously, whereas patients in the standard-of-care treatment group received six cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks intravenously. All patients received continuous androgen deprivation therapy. The primary endpoint was undetectable prostate-specific antigen (≤0·2 ng/mL) at 48 weeks, assessed using a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04343885.

FINDINGS

Between May 5, 2020, and April 18, 2023, 130 patients were randomly assigned, 63 (48%) to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel and 67 (52%) to docetaxel alone. All patients were male and no race or ethnicity data were collected. Median follow-up was 2·5 years (IQR 1·8-3·0). Four patients in the docetaxel alone group withdrew consent after randomisation and no data beyond screening were collected. An additional four patients were not evaluable for the primary endpoint at 48 weeks (two in each group). 25 (41%) of 61 patients (95% CI 30-54) in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group had undetectable PSA at 48 weeks compared with ten (16%) of 61 patients (9-28) in the docetaxel alone group (OR 3·88, 95% CI 1·61-9·38; p=0·0020). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were febrile neutropenia (seven [11%] of 63 patients in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group vs six [10%] of 63 patients in the docetaxel alone group) and diarrhoea (four [6%] of 63 patients vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 16 (25%) patients in the [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 plus docetaxel group (none were definitely related to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617) and 16 (25%) patients in the docetaxel alone group. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 followed by docetaxel improved antitumour activity in patients with de-novo high-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer compared with docetaxel alone, without increased toxic effects. Our data potentially support a role for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

FUNDING

Prostate Cancer Research Alliance (Movember Foundation and Australian Government Medical Research Future Fund), US Department of Defence Impact Award-Clinical Trials, Endocyte/Advanced Accelerator Applications (a Novartis company), Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organization, Victorian Cancer Agency, University of Melbourne, and Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation.

Activity of Lutetium-177 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen and Determinants of Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated with Cabazitaxel: The PACAP Study

BACKGROUND

Both cabazitaxel and lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) improve survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor and docetaxel, but there are limited data regarding Lu-PSMA activity after cabazitaxel.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the activity of Lu-PSMA and determinants of outcomes after cabazitaxel in mCRPC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of consecutive mCRPC patients from eight European centers treated with Lu-PSMA after cabazitaxel.

INTERVENTION

Lu-PSMA every 6-8 wk at a dose of 6-7.6 GBq.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). The secondary endpoints included time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (TTPSA), overall survival (OS), PSA decline, objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit, and safety.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of 126 patients, 68% had International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 4-5 disease, 21% had visceral metastases, and 7% had lymph node disease only. DNA damage repair (DDR) alterations were detected in 11/50 (22%) patients with available testing. Patients received a median number of 3 Lu-PSMA cycles (interquartile range 2-4). With a median follow-up of 12.0 mo, the median rPFS was 4.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.2-5.4), TTPSA 3.5 mo (95% CI 3.0-4.6), and OS 8.9 mo (95% CI 6.5-12.7). The ORR was 35%, and 55 patients (44%) experienced a PSA decline of ≥50%. The time to castration resistance of <12 mo was associated with shorter rPFS (p = 0.01). A similar trend was observed for ISUP grade 4-5 (p = 0.08), and baseline positron-emission tomography parameters including PSMA mean standardized uptake value (SUV) and maximum SUV (respectively, p = 0.06 and 0.05). The duration of previous cabazitaxel or DDR status did not impact outcomes. Patients experiencing a PSA decline of ≥ 50% on therapy demonstrated longer rPFS, TTPSA, and OS (all p < 0.0001). Limitations include retrospective data collection and investigator-based rPFS assessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lu-PSMA demonstrated a substantial PSA decline but limited rPFS after cabazitaxel in a real-life setting. Adverse baseline characteristics, baseline positron-emission tomography parameters, and quality of PSA response may help identify patients less likely to benefit from Lu-PSMA.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) improved outcomes in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer, but there are limited data about its activity after cabazitaxel, a chemotherapy that is also the standard of care in this setting. We conducted a study across eight European centers and showed substantial responses on Lu-PSMA after cabazitaxel, although activity was short lived in a heavily pretreated population. Our findings prompt for real-life evaluation of Lu-PSMA in earlier settings to define the best therapeutic sequence.

177Lu-PSMA-617 versus a change of androgen receptor pathway inhibitor therapy for taxane-naive patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (PSMAfore): a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) prolongs radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) and taxane therapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with taxane-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

METHODS

In this phase 3, randomised, controlled trial conducted at 74 sites across Europe and North America, taxane-naive patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had progressed once on a previous ARPI were randomly allocated (1:1) to open-label, intravenous 177Lu-PSMA-617 at a dosage of 7·4 GBq (200 mCi) ± 10% once every 6 weeks for six cycles, or a change of ARPI (to abiraterone or enzalutamide, administered orally on a continuous basis per product labelling). Crossover from ARPI change to 177Lu-PSMA-617 was allowed after centrally confirmed radiographic progression. The primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival, defined as the time from randomisation until radiographic progression or death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was a secondary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04689828) and is ongoing. In this primary report of the study, we present primary (first data cutoff) and updated (third data cutoff) analyses of radiographic progression-free survival; all other data are based on the third data cutoff.

FINDINGS

Overall, of the 585 patients screened, 468 met all eligibility criteria and were randomly allocated between June 15, 2021 and Oct 7, 2022 to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 (234 [50%] patients) or ARPI change (234 [50%]). Baseline characteristics were mostly similar between groups; median number of 177Lu-PSMA-617 cycles was 6·0 (IQR 4·0-6·0). Of patients assigned to ARPI change, 134 (57%) crossed over to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617. In the primary analysis (median time from randomisation to first data cutoff 7·26 months [IQR 3·38-10·55]), the median radiographic progression-free survival was 9·30 months (95% CI 6·77-not estimable) in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group versus 5·55 months (4·04-5·95) in the ARPI change group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·41 [95% CI 0·29-0·56]; p<0·0001). In the updated analysis at time of the third data cutoff (median time from randomisation to third data cutoff 24·11 months [IQR 20·24-27·40]), median radiographic progression-free survival was 11·60 months (95% CI 9·30-14·19) in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group versus 5·59 months (4·21-5·95) in the ARPI change group (HR 0·49 [95% CI 0·39-0·61]). The incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events was lower in the 177Lu-PSMA-617 group (at least one event in 81 [36%] of 227 patients; four [2%] grade 5 [none treatment related]) than the ARPI change group (112 [48%] of 232; five [2%] grade 5 [one treatment related]).

INTERPRETATION

177Lu-PSMA-617 prolonged radiographic progression-free survival relative to ARPI change, with a favourable safety profile. For patients with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who are being considered for a change of ARPI after progression on a previous ARPI, 177Lu-PSMA-617 may be an effective treatment alternative.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Radiotherapy and theranostics: a Lancet Oncology Commission

Following on from the 2015 Lancet Oncology Commission on expanding global access to radiotherapy, Radiotherapy and theranostics: a Lancet Oncology Commission was created to assess the access and availability of radiotherapy to date and to address the important issue of access to the promising field of theranostics at a global level. A marked disparity in the availability of radiotherapy machines between high-income countries and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been identified previously and remains a major problem. The availability of a suitably trained and credentialled workforce has also been highlighted as a major limiting factor to effective implementation of radiotherapy, particularly in LMICs. We investigated initiatives that could mitigate these issues in radiotherapy, such as extended treatment hours, hypofractionation protocols, and new technologies. The broad implementation of hypofractionation techniques compared with conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer and breast cancer was projected to provide radiotherapy for an additional 2·2 million patients (0·8 million patients with prostate cancer and 1·4 million patients with breast cancer) with existing resources, highlighting the importance of implementing new technologies in LMICs. A global survey undertaken for this Commission revealed that use of radiopharmaceutical therapy-other than 131I-was highly variable in high-income countries and LMICs, with supply chains, workforces, and regulatory issues affecting access and availability. The capacity for radioisotope production was highlighted as a key issue, and training and credentialling of health professionals involved in theranostics is required to ensure equitable access and availability for patient treatment. New initiatives-such as the International Atomic Energy Agency's Rays of Hope programme-and interest by international development banks in investing in radiotherapy should be supported by health-care systems and governments, and extended to accelerate the momentum generated by recognising global disparities in access to radiotherapy. In this Commission, we propose actions and investments that could enhance access to radiotherapy and theranostics worldwide, particularly in LMICs, to realise health and economic benefits and reduce the burden of cancer by accessing these treatments.

Intrapatient Intermetastatic Heterogeneity Determined by Triple-Tracer PET Imaging in mCRPC Patients and Correlation to Survival: The 3TMPO Cohort Study

Intrapatient intermetastatic heterogeneity (IIH) has been demonstrated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients and is of the utmost importance for radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) eligibility. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of IIH and RPT eligibility in mCRPC patients through a triple-tracer PET imaging strategy. Methods: This was a multisite prospective observational study in which mCRPC patients underwent both 18F-FDG and 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 PET/CT scans. A third scan with 68Ga-DOTATATE, a potential biomarker of neuroendocrine differentiation, was performed if an 18F-FDG-positive/68Ga-PSMA-negative lesion was found. Per-tracer lesion positivity was defined as having an uptake at least 50% above that of the liver. IIH prevalence was defined as the percentage of participants having at least 2 lesions with discordant features on multitracer PET. Results: IIH was observed in 81 patients (82.7%), and at least 1 18F-FDG-positive/68Ga-PSMA-negative lesion was found in 45 patients (45.9%). Of the 37 participants who also underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT, 6 (16.2%) had at least 1 68Ga-DOTATATE-positive lesion. In total, 12 different combinations of lesion imaging phenotypes were observed. On the basis of our prespecified criteria, 52 (53.1%) participants were determined to be eligible for PSMA RPT, but none for DOTATATE RPT. Patients with IIH had a significantly shorter median overall survival than patients without IIH (9.5 mo vs. not reached; log-rank P = 0.03; hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.8). Conclusion: Most mCRPC patients showed IIH, which was associated with shorter overall survival. On the basis of a triple-tracer PET approach, multiple phenotypic combinations were found. Correlation of these imaging phenotypes with genomics and treatment response will be relevant for precision medicine.

A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of the Efficacy, Toxicity, and Quality of Life Outcomes Following Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy Utilising Lutetium-177 and Actinium-225 in Metastatic Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) presents significant challenges. In this systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression, the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) outcomes of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT) utilising lutetium-177 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA) and actinium-225 ([225Ac]Ac-PSMA) were assessed.

METHODS

A detailed literature search across PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted, culminating in the inclusion of 100 studies involving 8711 patients. Data on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses, toxicity profiles, and QoL and survival outcomes were analysed. Proportional meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were performed.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

The estimated proportion of patients with PSA decline ≥50% was 0.49 for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA and 0.60 for [225Ac]Ac-PSMA in mPCa, particularly metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. A meta-regression analysis indicated an association between the cumulative amount of administered activity and the proportion of PSA ≥50% decline. Positive PSA responses were observed alongside improved overall survival across both therapies. Our analyses also identified the key factors associated with PSA responses and survival outcomes, including baseline haemoglobin level, and the presence of visceral metastases. Although anaemia was commonly observed, with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, severe toxicities were infrequent. Improved QoL was observed following [177Lu]Lu-PSMA therapy, whereas it remained stable following the second cycle of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA treatment. Heterogeneity across studies for PSA responses and toxicity profiles is a limitation.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our findings suggest an association between PRLT and reductions in PSA levels, as well as associations with enhanced survival outcomes in mPCa. Furthermore, our analysis shows a low incidence of severe toxicity associated with this treatment. These observations highlight the important role of PRLT in the management of mPCa.

The Rapidly Evolving Treatment Landscape of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

The management of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) or castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has become increasingly complex with the tremendous progress that has been made in this space within the past few decades. In the early days of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), ADT monotherapy was the mainstay for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. However, novel hormone therapies in the form of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) have emerged; vaccine therapy, chemotherapy with docetaxel and cabazitaxel, and radioactive ligands have shaped the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer in the last decade. Following the initial approval of several drugs for use in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in combination with primary ADT, these agents were studied and subsequently approved for use in mCSPC. Therefore, ADT monotherapy no longer constitutes an optimal therapeutic option for otherwise fit patients who present with mCSPC. We focus on the treatment of first-line de novo mHSPC or mCSPC and explore frontline doublet and triplet therapy and the pivotal trials that led to their United States Food and Drug Administration approval.

Strategic Advances in Combination Therapy for Metastatic Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Current Insights and Future Perspectives

The contemporary treatment for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) has evolved significantly, building on successes in managing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone has long been the cornerstone of mCSPC treatment, combination therapies have emerged as the new standard of care based on recent advances, offering improved survival outcomes. Landmark phase 3 trials demonstrated that adding chemotherapy (docetaxel) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors to ADT significantly enhances overall survival, particularly for patients with high-volume, high-risk, or de novo metastatic disease. Despite these advancements, a concerning gap between evidence-based guidelines and real-world practice remains, with many patients not receiving recommended combination therapies. The challenge in optimizing therapy sequences, considering both disease control and treatment burdens, and identifying clinical and biological subgroups that could benefit from personalized treatment strategies persists. The advent of triplet therapy has shown promise in extending survival, but the uro-oncology community must narrow the gap between evidence and practice to deliver the most effective care. Current research is focused on refining treatment approaches and utilizing biomarkers to guide therapy selection, aiming to offer more personalized and adaptive strategies for mCSPC management. Thus, aligning clinical practices with the evolving evidence is urgently needed to improve outcomes for patients facing this incurable disease.

Therapeutic Opportunities for Biomarkers in Metastatic Spine Tumors

For many spine surgeons, patients with metastatic cancer are often present in an emergent situation with rapidly progressive neurological dysfunction. Since the Patchell trial, scoring systems such as NOMS and SINS have emerged to guide the extent of surgical excision and fusion in the context of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Yet, while multidisciplinary decision-making is the gold standard of cancer care, in the middle of the night, when a patient needs spinal surgery, the wealth of chemotherapy data, clinical trials, and other medical advances can feel overwhelming. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the relevant molecular biomarkers and therapies driving patient survival in lung, breast, prostate, and renal cell cancer. We highlight the molecular differences between primary tumors (i.e., the patient's original lung cancer) and the subsequent spinal metastasis. This distinction is crucial, as there are limited data investigating how metastases respond to their primary tumor's targeted molecular therapies. Integrating information from primary and metastatic markers allows for a more comprehensive and personalized approach to cancer treatment.

Recommendations from the Galician Oncological Society and the Galician Society of Nuclear Medicine for the use of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand-therapy in prostate cancer

Theragnostic is a type of precision medicine that uses molecules linked to radioactive isotopes for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases. In recent years, it has gained significant importance to treat neuroendocrine tumors and is currently being used in prostate cancer. Various radiopharmaceuticals have emerged for diagnosing and detecting lesions showing prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positivity on the Positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan, being the most widely used labeled with [68Ga] and [18F]. Its use as therapy in prostate cancer (PC) has been assessed in the VISION, TheraP, and PSMAfore clinical trials conducted with the radioligand [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617, demonstrating significant antitumor activity. The aim of this article is to present practical recommendations, based on current available scientific evidence and on a multidisciplinary consensus, for the diagnosis and treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with PC.

First-Strike Rapid Predictive Dosimetry and Dose Response for 177Lu-PSMA Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

We devised and clinically validated a schema of rapid personalized predictive dosimetry for 177Lu-PSMA-I&T in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. It supersedes traditional empiric prescription by providing clinically meaningful predicted absorbed doses for first-strike optimization. Methods: Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET was conceptualized as a simulation study that captures the complex dosimetric interplay between tumor, marrow, and kidneys at a single time point. Radiation principles of fractionation, heterogeneity, normal-organ constraints (marrow, kidney), absorbed dose, and dose rate were introduced. We created a predictive calculator in the form of a free, open-source, and user-friendly spreadsheet that can be completed within minutes. Our schema achieves speed and accuracy by sampling tissue radioconcentrations (kBq/cm3) to be analyzed in conjunction with clinical input from the user that reflect dosimetric preconditions. The marrow-absorbed dose constraint was 0.217 Gy (dose rate, ≤0.0147 Gy/h) per fraction with an interfraction interval of at least 6 wk. Results: Our first 10 patients were analyzed. The first-strike mean tumor-absorbed dose threshold for any prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was more than 10 Gy (dose rate, >0.1 Gy/h). The metastasis with the lowest first-strike tumor-absorbed dose correlated the best with the percentage decrease of PSA; its threshold to achieve hypothetical zero PSA was 20 Gy or more. Each patient's PSA doubling time can be used to personalize their unique absorbed dose-response threshold. The predicted mean first-strike prescription constrained by marrow-absorbed dose rate per fraction was 11.0 ± 4.0 GBq. Highly favorable conditions (tumor sink effect) were dosimetrically expressed as the combination of tumor-to-normal-organ ratios of more than 150 for marrow and more than 4 for kidney. Our schema obviates the traditional role of the SUV as a predictive parameter. Conclusion: Our rapid schema is feasible to implement in any busy real-world theranostics unit and exceeds today's best practice standards. Our dosimetric thresholds and predictive parameters can radiobiologically rationalize each patient's first-strike prescription down to a single becquerel. Favorable tumor-to-normal-organ ratios can be prospectively exploited by predictive dosimetry to optimize the first-strike prescription. The scientific framework of our schema may be applied to other systemic radionuclide therapies.

Lu-177 PSMA vs Comparator Treatments and Survival in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Importance

Observed treatment effects on overall survival (OS) differed substantially in the first 2 randomized clinical trials of lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan (Lu-177) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Objective

To investigate factors associated with the observed difference in treatment effects on OS, including differences in the risk of crossover from randomized treatment after disease progression.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This comparative effectiveness study used individual participant data from 2 randomized clinical trials, TheraP (A Randomised Phase 2 Trial of 177Lu-PSMA617 Theranostic Versus Cabazitaxel in Progressive Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer [ANZUP Protocol 1603]) (n = 200), recruited from February 2018 to September 2019 in Australia, and published data from VISION (An International, Prospective, Open Label, Multicenter, Randomized Phase 3 Study of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in the Treatment of Patients With Progressive PSMA-Positive Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer) (n = 831), recruited from June 2018 to October 2019 in North America and Europe. Individual participant data for OS were reconstructed from VISION using the published survival curves. Data were analyzed February 6, 2018, to December 31, 2021, for TheraP and June 4, 2018, to January 27, 2021, for VISION.

Interventions

TheraP randomized participants to receive treatment with Lu-177 PSMA or cabazitaxel. VISION randomized participants to receive treatment with or without Lu-177 PSMA in addition to physicians' choice of protocol-permitted treatments (PPT; approved hormonal treatments [such as abiraterone and enzalutamide], bisphosphonates, radiotherapy, denosumab, or glucocorticoids), excluding cabazitaxel.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient characteristics, treatment protocols, and OS outcomes of the 2 trials were compared. Estimates of the effect on OS from TheraP were adjusted for crossover from randomly assigned treatment using a rank-preserving structural failure time model (RPSFTM) and inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW) methods.

Results

The 200 participants in TheraP and 831 participants in VISION were similar in age (median [range], 72 [49-86] vs 71 [40-94] years). Improved OS was observed in the comparator treatment group (cabazitaxel) in TheraP compared with VISION (PPT) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.39-0.71]). The Lu-177 PSMA treatment groups in TheraP and VISION had similar OS (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.70-1.19]). In TheraP, 20 of 101 participants in the cabazitaxel group crossed over to Lu-177 PSMA, while 32 of 99 participants in the Lu-177 PSMA arm crossed over to cabazitaxel. No statistically significant differences in OS between the Lu-177 PSMA and cabazitaxel groups of TheraP were observed after controlling for crossover to cabazitaxel: RPSFTM HR, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.60-1.58); IPCW HR, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.65-1.32); RPSFTM HR, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.60-1.58) and IPCW HR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.54-1.24) for crossover to Lu-177 PSMA; RPSFTM HR, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.53-1.74) and IPCW HR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.53-1.27) for crossover to either Lu-177 PSMA or cabazitaxel.

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings of this secondary analysis of the TheraP and VISION randomized clinical trials suggest that the choice of comparator treatments (ie, cabazitaxel vs PPT) may explain the difference in the observed effect of Lu-177 PSMA on OS between the 2 trials. Causal inference methods such as RPSFTM and IPCW may help rule out crossover as a plausible explanation.

Impact of Posttreatment SPECT/CT on Patient Management During 177Lu-PSMA-617 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy

177Lu can be imaged after administration using SPECT/CT. Most work to date has focused on using posttreatment imaging to measure normal organ and tumor dose. We aimed to assess the impact of posttreatment SPECT/CT on the management of patients undergoing 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Methods: In this retrospective study, 122 patients underwent PSMA RPT with subsequent SPECT/CT 24 h after treatment. We determined a qualitative response at each cycle and reviewed patient charts to assess the impact that posttreatment SPECT/CT had on patient management. Changes in patient management were classified as changes on the basis of progression and response, and specific cycles when they occurred were noted. Miscellaneous changes in patient management were also evaluated. Results: Among the 122 consecutive patients examined, 42%-56% exhibited stable disease, whereas 19%-39% of patients exhibited response on visual assessment across treatment cycles. In total, 49% (n = 60) of patients experienced changes in management, of which 57% (n = 34) were due to progression, 40% (n = 24) were due to response, and 3% (n = 2) were due to miscellaneous changes. Changes due to disease progression were observed mostly after cycles 2 and 4. Changes due to response to RPT occurred mostly after cycles 3 and 4. Conclusion: At our center, 49% of patients experienced changes in management based on posttreatment SPECT/CT, and most of these changes occurred at cycles 2 and 4. Integrating posttreatment SPECT/CT into routine PSMA RPT protocols can aid in patient management.

Efficacy and safety of rechallenge with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T radioligand therapy in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcome of rechallenge [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T in newly progressed mCRPC patients after response to initial [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (PRLT).

METHODS

We retrospectively included 18 patients who underwent rechallenge with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. All patients presented with (i) newly progressed disease after response to initial PRLT; (ii) a [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT confirming the presence of PSMA-positive metastases; iii) ECOG performance status 0-1. Adverse events were graded according to CTCAE v5.0. Response was assessed by PSA and classified according to PCWG3 recommendations. For patients who underwent restaging with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, imaging response was categorised according to adapted PERCIST v1.0. In patients with discordant [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and PSA, other available imaging modalities were evaluated to confirm disease status. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the first cycle of initial PRLT and rechallenge PRLT, respectively, until last patient contact or death.

RESULTS

Patients were initially treated with a median of 5 cycles (range 4-7) and were rechallenged after a median of 9 months (range 3-13). Each patient received a median of 4 (range 2-7) rechallenge cycles (median cumulative activity 26.1 GBq). None of the patients experienced life-threatening G4 adverse events during either treatment period. Grade 3 adverse events included one case of anaemia, one case of thrombocytopenia, and one case of renal failure. In 8/18 patients long-term toxicities were evaluated. Serious toxicities (≥ Grade 3) occurred in 3/8 patients (n = 1 G4 thrombocytopenia, n = 1 G4 renal failure and n = 1 pancytopenia and G4 renal failure). Best PSA50%-response was observed in 44% of patients and PSA-disease control was confirmed in 56% of patients at the last cycle. Of the 12/18 patients restaged by imaging, 6/12 (50%) patients had disease control (partial response/stable disease), 1/12 had a mixed response, and 5/12 had progression. After a median follow-up time of 25 months (range 14-44), 10 patients had died, 7 were still alive, and one patient was lost at follow-up. The median OS was 29 months (95%CI, 14.3-43.7 months) for the initial treatment and 11 months (95%CI, 8.1-13.8 months) for the first rechallenge course.

CONCLUSION

More than half of patients benefit from rechallenge PRLT. Our analysis suggests that rechallenge may prolong survival in selected patients, with an acceptable safety profile.

Neurologic Symptoms After 177Lu-Prostate-Specific-Membrane Antigen-617 Therapy: A Single-Center Experience

Treatment with 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 (177Lu-vipivotide tetraxetan [Pluvicto]) prolongs both progression-free and overall survival in advanced PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Data examining specifically neurologic symptoms after 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment are scarce. In this study, we aimed to review the neurologic findings in a large cohort of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. Methods: The clinical records and imaging data of patients who received their initial dose of 177Lu-PSMA-617 between March 2022 and November 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients presenting for medical evaluation, regardless of specific specialty appointments, with new or worsening neurologic symptoms were included in the study. Results: A total of 185 patients underwent 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy. The median age was 70 y (range, 58-90 y). The mean follow-up time was 12.04 ± 2.87 mo. Fifty-five new or worsening neurologic symptoms were observed in 50 patients (27%, 50/185). Of these, 27 (11.9%, 27/185) reported altered taste. Eleven patients (6%, 11/185) experienced dizziness with no other clear etiology; 2 of these patients were admitted to the emergency department (ED). Paresthesia symptoms were reported in 6 patients (3.2%, 6/185). Five patients (2.7%, 5/185) reported headaches, 3 of these patients were admitted to the ED because of the severity of the symptoms. Two patients (1.08%, 2/185) presented with extremity weakness. Two patients (1.08%, 2/185) had an ischemic stroke and were admitted to the ED. One patient (0.05%, 1/185) exhibited gait disturbances. In total, 7 patients (3.78%, 7/185) were admitted to the ED because of neurologic symptoms. None of the patients discontinued or failed to complete the 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy because of neurologic symptoms. Conclusion: After 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment, the most common neurologic symptoms were dysgeusia and dizziness. In this study, our follow-up period and population size might not have been sufficient to detect delayed or uncommon neurologic symptoms. In patients without neurologic symptoms or central nervous system metastases before treatment, we found the development of severe neurologic problems to be rare and unlikely to require discontinuation of treatment.

PSMA PET/CT quick procedure guide

The application of PET/CT with radiopharmaceuticals targeting PSMA is significantly transforming the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of patients with prostate cancer. In Spain, the availability and access to positron-emitting radiopharmaceuticals targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) have significantly changed in recent months. These changes are affecting their use in diagnostic procedures. As a result, its use within diagnostic protocols for patients with prostate cancer is undergoing significant modifications. In this collective and cooperative document, the authors have selected the most robust evidence accumulated to date to generate a clinical guide to achieve appropriate use of this technology. A format that presents the most frequent clinical situations and the patient profiles in which PSMA PET/CT plays a significant role or will do so in the immediate future has been chosen. It should be taken into account that regulatory restrictions mediate the current indications for its use in Spain, as well as its current cost and the production capacity of radiopharmaceuticals. The guideline presents a review of the established methodology for optimized imaging with each of the radiopharmaceutical variants targeting PSMA and recommendations for structured and accurate reporting of metabolic findings in combination with CT.

Detection of tumour heterogeneity in patients with advanced, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer on [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 and 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT: a pilot study

PURPOSE

In metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), some patients show low/absent PSMA expression in tumour lesions on positron emission tomography (PET) scans, indicating heterogeneity and heightened risk of non-response to PSMA-RLT (radioligand therapy). Imaging cancer-associated fibroblasts and glucose uptake may further characterise tumour heterogeneity in mCRPC patients. Here, we aimed to evaluate tumour heterogeneity and its potential implications for management in mCRPC patients assessed for PSMA-RLT using [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46, 2-[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 PET.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with advanced, progressive mCRPC underwent clinical [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007, 2-[18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT to evaluate treatment with PSMA-directed RLT. Tumour detection/semiquantitative parameters were compared on a per-lesion/-region basis. Two phenotypes were defined: Criteria for the mixed phenotype were: (a) PSMA-negative findings for lymph node metastases ≥ 2.5 cm, any solid organ metastases ≥ 1.0 cm, or bone metastases with soft tissue component ≥ 1.0 cm, (b) low [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 uptake and/or (c) balanced tumour uptake of all radioligands. The PSMA-dominant phenotype was assigned if the criteria were not met.

RESULTS

In ten patients, 472 lesions were detected on all imaging modalities (miTNM regions: M1b: 327 (69.3%), M1a: 95 (20.1%), N1: 26 (5.5%), M1c: 18 (3.8%), T: 5 (1.1%) and Tr: 1 (0.2%). [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 (n = 453 (96.0%)) demonstrates the highest detection rate, followed by [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 (n = 268 (56.8%))/2-[18F]FDG (n = 241 (51.1%)). Semiquantitative uptake was highest for [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 (mean SUVmax (interquartile range): 22.7 (22.5), vs. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 (7.7 (3.7)) and 2-[18F]FDG (6.8 (4.7)). Seven/three patients were retrospectively assigned to the PSMA-dominant/mixed phenotype. Median overall survival was significantly longer for patients who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT and were retrospectively assigned to the PSMA-dominant phenotype (19.7 vs. 9.3 months).

CONCLUSION

Through whole-body imaging, we identify considerable inter- and intra-patient heterogeneity of mCRPC and potential imaging phenotypes. Regarding uptake and tumour detection, [68Ga]Ga-/[18F]F-PSMA-11/-1007 was superior to [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 and 2-[18F]FDG, while the latter two were comparable. Patients who underwent [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT based on clinical-decision making had a longer overall survival and could be assigned to the PSMA-dominant phenotype.

Therapeutic response and safety of radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers and leading cause of death due to cancer across the globe. This persuaded researchers to devise innovative treatment modalities that may prove effective, safe, and demonstrate better outcomes in terms of patient morbidity and survival. The advancement in theranostics such as lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617 radioligand therapies can target prostate cancer cells causing negligible or no damage to most of the normal tissues in patients. It has been proven to effectively improve the quality of life and progression-free survival. In this study, stage IV metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients were treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617, and the therapeutic response and safety of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy were evaluated six months after the treatment. Additionally, molecular docking studies were also conducted to find the possible mechanism at the molecular level that causes the effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in prostate cancer.

Investigating Combination Therapy: The Role of Lutetium-177 PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy and Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Background: The combination of Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) has shown promise in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, real-world data on the efficacy and safety of this combination are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of combination therapy with Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT and ARPIs on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with mCRPC. Methods: In this retrospective study, 104 mCRPC patients receiving Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT at our institution between December 2017 and January 2024 were divided into the following two groups those receiving Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT plus ARPI (n = 34) and those receiving Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT alone (n = 70). Patients received 150 to 200 millicuries Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT in each cycle. PFS and zOS were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: The combination therapy significantly prolonged median PFS compared to Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT alone (11 vs. 5.6 months; HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.79; p < 0.01). A trend towards improved OS was also observed in the combination group (20.3 vs. 15.9 months; HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.33-1.02; p = 0.06). Age was a significant predictor of OS (21.2 vs. 12.4 months for younger vs. older patients; p < 0.01), while Gleason score and visceral involvement did not significantly impact PFS. The safety profile indicated that adverse effects were generally comparable between the two groups, with no statistically significant differences in the incidence of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nephrotoxicity, or hepatotoxicity. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that combining Lu-177 PSMA-617 RLT with ARPIs may significantly improve PFS in mCRPC patients. The potential OS benefit warrants further investigation in larger prospective trials. Age should be considered when making treatment decisions for mCRPC patients.

Imaging and therapy in prostate cancer using prostate specific membrane antigen radioligands

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) directed PET imaging has rapidly transformed prostate cancer workup over the past decade and paved the way for a theranostic approach using 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). This review gives an overview of the underlying principles behind PSMA as a target; the current use of PSMA PET in prostate cancer imaging and benefits compared to conventional imaging; and therapeutic applications including optimisation of patient selection. It also explores the evidence base of PSMA PET for other indications not in routine clinical use and the future of PSMA-directed RLT.

Clinical Trial Protocol for VIOLET: A Single-Center, Phase I/II Trial Evaluation of Radioligand Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA is an effective class of therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC); however, progression is inevitable. The limited durability of response may be partially explained by the presence of micrometastatic deposits, which are energy-sheltered and receive low absorbed radiation with 177Lu due to the approximately 0.7-mm mean pathlength. 161Tb has abundant emission of Auger and conversion electrons that deposit a higher concentration of radiation over a shorter path, particularly to single tumor cells and micrometastases. 161Tb has shown in vitro and in vivo efficacy superior to that of 177Lu. We aim to demonstrate that [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will deliver effective radiation to sites of metastatic prostate cancer with an acceptable safety profile. Methods: This single-center, single-arm, phase I/II trial will recruit 30 patients with mCRPC. Key eligibility criteria include a diagnosis of mCRPC with progression after at least one line of taxane chemotherapy (unless medically unsuitable) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitor; prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive disease on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 or [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT (SUVmax ≥ 20); no sites of discordance on [18F]FDG PET/CT; adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of no more than 2, and no prior treatment with another radioisotope. The dose escalation is a 3 + 3 design to establish the safety of 3 prespecified activities of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T (4.4, 5.5, and 7.4 GBq). The maximum tolerated dose will be defined as the highest activity level at which a dose-limiting toxicity occurs in fewer than 2 of 6 participants. The dose expansion will include 24 participants at the maximum tolerated dose. Up to 6 cycles of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T will be administered intravenously every 6 wk, with each subsequent activity reduced by 0.4 GBq. The coprimary objectives are to establish the maximum tolerated dose and safety profile (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) of [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T. Secondary objectives include measuring absorbed radiation dose (Gy), evaluating antitumor activity (prostate-specific antigen 50% response rate, radiographic and prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate), and evaluating pain (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form) and health-related quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Radionuclide Therapy). Conclusion: Enrollment was completed in February 2024. Patients are still receiving [161Tb]Tb-PSMA-I&T.

A phase 2, single-arm trial evaluating 131 I-PSMA-1095 targeted radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains uniformly lethal. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in prostate cancer. 131 I-PSMA-1095 (also known as 131 I-MIP-1095) is a PSMA-targeted radioligand which selectively delivers therapeutic radiation to cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of 131 I-PSMA-1095 in mCRPC patients who had exhausted all lines of approved therapy. All patients underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET and 18 F-FDG PET to determine PSMA-positive tumor volume, and patients with >50% PSMA-positive tumor volume were treated with up to four doses of 131 I-PSMA-1095. The primary endpoint was the response rate of prostate specific antigen (PSA). Secondary endpoints included rates of radiographic response and adverse events. Overall and radiographic progression-free survival were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were screened for inclusion and nine patients received 131 I-PSMA-1095. The median baseline PSA was 162 µg/l, and six patients demonstrated a >50% PSA decrease. One patient demonstrated a confirmed radiographic response. Median overall survival was 10.3 months, and median progression-free survival was 5.4 months. Four patients experienced adverse events of grade 3 or higher, the most frequent being thrombocytopenia and anemia.

CONCLUSION

131 I-PSMA-1095 is highly active against heavily-pretreated PSMA-positive mCRPC, significantly decreasing tumor burden as measured by PSA. Adverse events, mainly hematologic toxicity, were not infrequent, likely related to off-target irradiation. This hematologic toxicity, as well as a higher logistical burden associated with use, could represent relative disadvantages of 131 I-PSMA-1095 compared to 177 Lu-PSMA-617.

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2024 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) have been updated. Here we provide a summary of the 2024 guidelines.

METHODS

The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence.

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Risk stratification for relapsing PCa after primary therapy may guide salvage therapy decisions. New treatment options, such as androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs), ARTA + chemotherapy combinations, PARP inhibitors and their combinations, and prostate-specific membrane antigen-based therapy have become available for men with metastatic PCa.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Evidence for relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant PCa is evolving rapidly. These guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. The full version is available online (http://uroweb.org/guideline/ prostate-cancer/).

PATIENT SUMMARY

This article summarises the 2024 guidelines for the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. These guidelines are based on evidence and guide doctors in discussing treatment decisions with their patients. The guidelines are updated every year.

Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Selective Prostatic Arterial and Intravenous PSMA PET/CT Radioligand Infusions in Primary Prostatic Adenocarcinoma

Background Intravenous prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy improves survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Yet, the impact of selective prostatic arterial administration on primary tumor uptake is unclear. Purpose To compare gallium 68 (68Ga)-PSMA-11 uptake using dynamic PET/CT in prostatic tumoral volumes of interest (VOIs) during intravenous and selective prostatic arterial infusions for individuals with untreated, high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective, intraindividual comparative study conducted at an academic medical center, five men aged 58, 61, 64, 66, and 68 years with treatment-naive prostate cancer were enrolled between January 2022 and February 2023 and underwent two dynamic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT examinations 1 week apart. During the first examination, the radiotracer was administered intravenously. During the second administration, the radiotracer was delivered into either the right or left prostatic artery through an angiographically placed microcatheter. The primary outcome was maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in prostatic tumoral VOIs. The secondary outcomes included mean SUV (SUVmean) in prostatic tumoral VOIs and area under the SUVmean curves (AUC). Longitudinal mixed-effects models were used to compare dynamic SUVmax and SUVmean time-activity curves (TACs), and paired t tests were used for the remaining data. Results The mean SUVmax within tumoral VOIs was 14 (range, 3-43) for venous sessions and 938 (range, 460-1436) for arterial sessions (P = .008). The SUVmean within VOIs was greater during arterial sessions (P < .001) overall and 46-fold and 19-fold greater at peak uptake and final time points, respectively. The mean AUC was greater on arterial TACs than on venous TACs at 14600 SUV × min (range, 8353-20025 SUV × min) and 240 SUV × min (range, 69-622 SUV × min), respectively (P = .002). Conclusion Selective prostatic arterial infusion resulted in greater 68Ga-PSMA-11 tumoral SUV than intravenous infusion. Further study of local-regional, intra-arterial delivery of a PSMA-targeted theranostic agent is warranted in high-risk prostate cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04976257 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Civelek in this issue.

Organ and tumor dosimetry including method simplification for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T for treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Internal dosimetry in individual patients is essential for safe and effective radioligand therapy. Multiple time point imaging for accurate dosimetry is time consuming and hence can be demanding for nuclear medicine departments as well as patients. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess absorbed doses to organs at risk and tumor lesions for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T using whole body SPECT imaging and (2) to investigate possible simplified dosimetry protocols.

METHODS

This study included 16 patients each treated with 4 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T. They underwent quantitative whole body SPECT/CT imaging (3 bed positions) at four time points (TP) comprising 2 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72-168 h post-injection (p.i.). Full 3D dosimetry (reference method) was performed for all patients and dose cycles for organs at risk (kidneys, parotid glands and submandibular glands) and up to ten tumor lesions per patient (resulting in 90 lesions overall). The simplified dosimetry methods (SM) included (1) generating time activity curves for subsequent cycles using a single TP of imaging applying the kinetics of dose cycle 1, and for organs at risk also (2) simple extrapolation from dose cycle 1 and (3) from both, dose cycle 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Normalized absorbed doses were 0.71 ± 0.32 mGy/MBq, 0.28 ± 0.12 mGy/MBq and 0.22 ± 0.08 mGy/MBq for kidneys, parotid glands and submandibular glands, respectively. Tumor doses decreased from 3.86 ± 3.38 mGy/MBq in dose cycle 1 to 2.01 ± 2.65 mGy/MBq in dose cycle 4. Compared to the full dosimetry approach the SM 1 using single TP imaging at 48 h p.i. resulted in the most accurate and precise results for the organs at risk in terms of absorbed doses per cycle and total cumulated dose. For tumor lesions better results were achieved using the fourth TP (≥ 72 h p.i.).

CONCLUSION

Simplification of safety dosimetry protocols is possible for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-I&T therapy. If tumor dosimetry is of interest a later imaging TP (≥ 72 h p.i.) should be used/added to account for the slower kinetics of tumors compared to organs at risk.

Emerging frontiers in androgen receptor research for prostate Cancer: insights from the 2nd international androgen receptor Symposium

Continued exploration of the androgen receptor (AR) is crucial, as it plays pivotal roles in diverse diseases such as prostate cancer (PCa), serving as a significant therapeutic focus. Therefore, the Department of Urology Dresden hosted an international meeting for scientists and clinical oncologists to discuss the newest advances in AR research. The 2nd International Androgen Receptor Symposium was held in Dresden, Saxony, Germany, from 26-27.04.2024, organised by Dr. Holger H.H. Erb. Following the format of the first meeting, more than 35 scientists from 8 countries attended the event to discuss recent developments, research challenges, and identification of venues in AR research. An important new feature was the involvement of PhD students and young investigators, acknowledging the high scientific quality of their work. The symposium included three covers: new advances from clinical research, basic and translational research, and novel strategies to target AR. Moreover, based on its increasing clinical relevance, a PSMA theranostic mini-symposium was added at the end of the AR symposium to allow the audience to discuss the newest advances in PSMA theranostic. This report focuses on the highlights and discussions of the meeting.

Efficacy and safety of rechallenge [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT after initial partial remission in patients with mCRPC: evaluation of a prospective registry (REALITY study)

AIM

Rechallenge of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) was proposed for patients who initially responded to PSMA-RLT experiencing partial remission, but relapsed into progression after a certain period of remission. However, only limited data is available regarding this approach. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy and safety profile of one or more series of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge in patients from a prospective registry (REALITY Study, NCT04833517) after they initially benefited from PSMA-RLT.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had biochemical response to initial [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT followed by disease progression received at least one (up to three) series of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge. Biochemical response rates based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum value, PSA-based progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Adverse events of the treatment were assessed according to 'common terminology criteria for adverse events' (CTCAE).

RESULTS

After one series of RLT rechallenge, a PSA decline of at least 50% was achieved in 27/47 patients (57.4%). The median PFS of all patients was 8.7 mo and the median OS was 22.7 mo, each calculated from the administration of the first rechallenge series. Patients who responded (PSA decline > 50%) to the rechallenge showed a median OS of 27.3 mo. Regarding PFS, a significant correlation (r = 0.4128, p = 0.0323) was found for these patients comparing initial and rechallenge RLT. Ten patients received a second and 3 patients received a third rechallenge series with 8/10 and 3/3 patients responding to repeated RLT rechallenge. No severe deterioration of adverse events rated by CTCAE criteria was observed.

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 RLT rechallenge is associated with significant PSA response and encouraging survival outcome as well as a very favourable safety profile and should therefore be considered as a straight-forward treatment option in mCRPC patients, who previously benefited from PSMA-RLT.

Review on the Increasing Role for PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy in Prostate Cancer

In 2021, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), TheraP and VISION, demonstrated that 177Lu-PSMA-617 as monotherapy was more effective for the decline of PSA than the comparator third-line treatments.

METHODS

Our review summarizes new RCTs that add to the use of radioligand therapy (RLT) for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

RESULTS

Four past and present RCTs included 1081 patients. An RCT, ENZA-p, studied first-line treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). A combination of enzalutamide (ENZA) and 177Lu-PSMA-617 gave longer progression-free survival than ENZA as monotherapy. Other RCTs of patients with mCRPC, including the PSMAfore, and SPLASH trials, showed 177Lu-PSMA-617 as second-line treatment gave better progression-free survival than androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (combined p value < 6.9 × 10-6).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PCa gain if they are given PSMA-RLT early in the treatment of PCa and as part of combination therapies.

Biological determinants of PSMA expression, regulation and heterogeneity in prostate cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an important cell-surface imaging biomarker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer. The PSMA-targeted theranostic 177Lu-PSMA-617 was approved in 2022 for men with PSMA-PET-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, not all patients respond to PSMA-radioligand therapy, in part owing to the heterogeneity of PSMA expression in the tumour. The PSMA regulatory network is composed of a PSMA transcription complex, an upstream enhancer that loops to the FOLH1 (PSMA) gene promoter, intergenic enhancers and differentially methylated regions. Our understanding of the PSMA regulatory network and the mechanisms underlying PSMA suppression is evolving. Clinically, molecular imaging provides a unique window into PSMA dynamics that occur on therapy and with disease progression, although challenges arise owing to the limited resolution of PET. PSMA regulation and heterogeneity - including intertumoural and inter-patient heterogeneity, temporal changes, lineage dynamics and the tumour microenvironment - affect PSMA theranostics. PSMA response and resistance to radioligand therapy are mediated by a number of potential mechanisms, and complementary biomarkers beyond PSMA are under development. Understanding the biological determinants of cell surface target regulation and heterogeneity can inform precision medicine approaches to PSMA theranostics as well as other emerging therapies.

Current Advances in Radioactive Iodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND

Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients have an outstanding overall long-term survival rate, and certain subsets of DTC patients have a very high likelihood of disease recurrence. Radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy is a cornerstone in DTC management, but cancer cells can eventually develop resistance to RAI. Radioactive iodine-refractory DTC (RAIR-DTC) is a condition defined by ATA 2015 guidelines when DTC cannot concentrate RAI ab initio or loses RAI uptake ability after the initial therapy. The RAIR condition implies that RAI cannot reveal new met-astatic foci, so RAIR-DTC metabolic imaging needs new tracers. 18F-FDG PET/CT has been widely used and has demonstrated prognostic value, but 18F-FDG DTC avidity may remain low. Fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FA-Pi)s, prostatic-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and somatostatin receptor (SSTR) tracers have been proposed as theragnostic agents in experimental settings and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptides in the diagnostic trial field. Multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors are relatively new drugs approved in RAIR-DTC therapy. Despite the promising targeted setting, they relate to frequent adverse-event onset. Sorafenib and trametinib have been included in re-differentiation protocols aimed at re-inducing RAI accumulation in DTC cells. Results appear promising, but not excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

RAIR-DTC remains a challenging nosological entity. There are still controversies on RAIR-DTC definition and post-RAI therapy evaluation, with post-therapy whole-body scan (PT-WBS) the only validated criterion of response. The recent introduction of multiple diagnostic and therapeutic agents obliges physicians to pursue a multidisciplinary approach aiming to correct drug introduction and timing choice.

Comparison of novel PSMA-targeting [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 with its albumin binding derivative [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: a first-in-human study

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising target for diagnosis and radioligand therapy (RLT) of prostate cancer. Two novel PSMA-targeting radionuclide therapy agents, [177Lu]Lu-P17-087, and its albumin binder modified derivative, [177Lu]Lu-P17-088, were evaluated in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. The primary endpoint was dosimetry evaluation, the second endpoint was radiation toxicity assessment (CTCAE 5.0) and PSA response (PCWG3).

METHODS

Patients with PSMA-positive tumors were enrolled after [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT scan. Five mCRPC patients received [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 and four other patients received [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 (1.2 GBq/patient). Multiple whole body planar scintigraphy was performed at 1.5, 4, 24, 48, 72, 120 and 168 h after injection and one SPECT/CT imaging was performed at 24 h post-injection for each patient. Dosimetry evaluation was compared in both patient groups.

RESULTS

Patients showed no major clinical side-effects under this low dose treatment. As expected [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 with longer blood circulation (due to its albumin binding) exhibited higher effective doses than [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 (0.151 ± 0.036 vs. 0.056 ± 0.019 mGy/MBq, P = 0.001). Similarly, red marrow received 0.119 ± 0.068 and 0.048 ± 0.020 mGy/MBq, while kidney doses were 0.119 ± 0.068 and 0.046 ± 0.022 mGy/MBq, respectively. [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 demonstrated excellent tumor uptake and faster kinetics; while [177Lu]Lu-P17-088 displayed a slower washout and higher average dose (7.75 ± 4.18 vs. 4.72 ± 2.29 mGy/MBq, P = 0.018). After administration of [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 and [177Lu]Lu-P17-088, 3/5 and 3/4 patients showed reducing PSA values, respectively.

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]Lu-P17-088 and [177Lu]Lu-P17-087 displayed different pharmacokinetics but excellent PSMA-targeting dose delivery in mCRPC patients. These two agents are promising RLT agents for personalized treatment of mCRPC. Further studies with increased dose and frequency of RLT are warranted to evaluate the potential therapeutic efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

177Lu-P17-087/177Lu-P17-088 in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (NCT05603559, Registered at 25 October, 2022). URL OF REGISTRY: https://classic.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ct2/show/NCT05603559 .

Combination Strategies and Targeted Radionuclide Therapies

Combination models utilising treatments from two or more therapeutic classes are well established in cancer care. In the new era of theranostic (theragnostic) medicine there is an ongoing need to identify and refine novel combination strategies to optimise multidisciplinary care for conditions commonly encountered in nuclear medicine such as neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), prostate cancer (PCa), and thyroid cancer, along with seeking advancements in molecular imaging and therapy techniques for other tumour streams. This concise review explores the background of theranostic monotherapy, established approaches to combination strategies in theranostics, and emerging targeted radionuclide therapies in use or under active investigation, with a focus on Australian-led studies.

225 Ac-PSMA-617 Augmentation in High-Risk mCRPC Undergoing 177 Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy : Pilot Experience From a Prospective Registry

PURPOSE

This pilot study investigates the efficacy and safety profile as well as predictive biomarkers of 225 Ac-PSMA-617-augmented 177 Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) in a cohort of high-risk patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), enrolled in a prospective registry (NCT04833517).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A group of n = 33 high-risk mCRPC patients received 177 Lu-PSMA-617 RLT, augmented by 1 or more cycles of 225 Ac-PSMA-617. Response was assessed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum value after 2 cycles of treatment. Overall survival (OS) and PSA-based progression-free survival were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. To assess the side effect profile, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were applied. In total, 12 potential pretherapeutic biomarkers were tested for association with OS.

RESULTS

The median decrease in serum PSA value was -49.1%, and 16/33 (48.5%) patients experienced a partial response after 2 cycles RLT. The median PSA-based progression-free survival and median OS was 7.2 and 14.8 months, respectively. Alkaline phosphatase ( P < 0.001), lactate dehydrogenase ( P = 0.035), Eastern European Oncology Group Performance Score ( P = 0.037), and the presence of visceral metastases ( P = 0.029) revealed significant association with OS in Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank test). Most of the recorded adverse events were rated as mild or moderate. Higher-grade adverse events were very limited with only 1 case (3.0%) of grade 3 anemia. Treatment-related mild xerostomia was recorded in 6/33 (18.2%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

225 Ac-PSMA-617 augmentation in high-risk mCRPC undergoing 177 Lu-PSMA-617 RLT appears to be an effective treatment option with a favorable safety profile. The pretherapeutic values of alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, the Eastern European Oncology Group Performance Score, and the presence of visceral metastases may be appropriate biomarkers predicting survival outcome of this treatment regimen.

Same-day post-therapy imaging with a new generation whole-body digital SPECT/CT in assessing treatment response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy (RLT) represents a significant advancement for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), demonstrating improvements in radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) with a low rate of associated side effects. Currently, most post-therapy SPECT/CT is conducted at 24 h after infusion. This study examines the clinical utility of a next-generation multi-detector Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride (CZT) SPECT/CT system (StarGuide) in same-day post-infusion assessment and early treatment response to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 68 men with progressive mCRPC treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at our center from June 2022 to June 2023 were evaluated. Digital whole-body SPECT/CT imaging was performed after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617infusion (mean ± SD: 1.8 ± 0.6 h, range 1.1-4.9 h). Quantitative analysis of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 positive lesions was performed in patients who underwent at least 2 post-therapy SPECT/CT, using liver parenchyma uptake as reference. Metrics including [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 positive total tumor volume (Lu-TTV), SUVmax and SUVmean were calculated. These quantitative metrics on post-infusion SPECT/CT images after cycles 1, 2 and 3 were correlated with overall survival (OS), prostate specific antigen-progression free survival (PSA-PFS) as defined by prostate cancer working group 3 (PCWG3), and PSA decrease over 50% (PSA50) response rates.

RESULTS

56 patients (means age 76.2 ± 8.1 years, range: 60-93) who underwent at least 2 post-therapy SPECT/CT were included in the image analysis. The whole-body SPECT/CT scans (~ 12 min per scan) were well tolerated, with 221 same-day scans performed (89%). At a median of 10-months follow-up, 33 (58.9%) patients achieved PSA50 after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment and median PSA-PFS was 5.0 months (range: 1.0-15 months) while median OS was not reached. Quantitative analysis of SPECT/CT images showed that 37 patients (66%) had > 30% reduction in Lu-TTV, associated with significantly improved overall survival (median not reached vs. 6 months, P = 0.008) and PSA-PFS (median 6 months vs. 1 months, P < 0.001). However, changes in SUVmax or SUVmean did not correlate with PSA-PFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

We successfully implemented same-day post-therapy SPECT/CT after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 infusions. Quantitation of 1-2 h post-therapy SPECT/CT images is a promising method for assessing treatment response. However, the approach is currently limited by its suboptimal detection of small tumor lesions and the necessity of incorporating a third-cycle SPECT/CT to mitigate the effects of any potential treatment-related flare-up. Further investigation in a larger patient cohort and prospective validation is essential to confirm these findings and to explore the role of SPECT/CT as a potential adjunct to PSMA PET/CT in managing mCRPC.

Role of Lutetium Radioligand Therapy in Prostate Cancer

Theranostics utilize ligands that chelate radionuclides and selectively bind with cancer-specific membrane antigens. In the case of prostate cancer (PCa), the state-of-the-art lutetium-177-PSMA combines the radioactive β-emitter 177Lu with Vipivotide Tetraxetan, a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-binding ligand. Several studies have been conducted, and the therapy is not without adverse effects (e.g., xerostomia, nausea, and fatigue); however, few events are reported as severe. The available evidence supports the use of 177Lu-PSMA in selected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, and the treatment is considered a standard of care in several clinical scenarios. Emerging research shows promising results in the setting of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; however, evidence from high-quality controlled trials is still missing. In this review, we discuss the available evidence for the application of 177Lu-PSMA in the management of PCa patients.

[68Ga]PSMA-11 for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positive lesions in men with prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Theranostics targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) represent a new targeted approach for prostate cancer care that combines diagnostic and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals to diagnose and treat the disease. Positron emission tomography (PET) is the imaging method of choice and several diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals for quantifying PSMA have received FDA approval and are in clinical use. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is one such imaging agent and the focus of this article. One beta-emitting radioligand therapy ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617) has also received FDA approval for prostate cancer treatment, and several other alpha- and beta-emitting radioligand therapies are in clinical trials.

AREAS COVERED

Theranostics targeting PSMA in men with prostate cancer are discussed with a focus on use of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for imaging PSMA-positive lesions in men with prostate cancer. The review covers [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 manufacture, current regulatory status, comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 to other imaging techniques, clinical updates, and emerging applications of artificial intelligence for [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET.

EXPERT OPINION

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is used in conjunction with a PET/CT scan to image PSMA positive lesions in men with prostate cancer. It is manufactured by chelating precursor with68Ga, either from a generator or cyclotron, and has regulatory approval around the world. It is widely used clinically in conjunction with radioligand therapies like [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617.

Alpha and Beta Radiation for Theragnostics

Targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) has significantly evolved from its beginnings with iodine-131 to employing carrier molecules with beta emitting isotopes like lutetium-177. With the success of Lu-177-DOTATATE for neuroendocrine tumors and Lu-177-PSMA-617 for prostate cancer, several other beta emitting radioisotopes, such as Cu-67 and Tb-161, are being explored for TRT. The field has also expanded into targeted alpha therapy (TAT) with agents like radium-223 for bone metastases in prostate cancer, and several other alpha emitter radioisotopes with carrier molecules, such as Ac-225, and Pb-212 under clinical trials. Despite these advancements, the scope of TRT in treating diverse solid tumors and integration with other therapies like immunotherapy remains under investigation. The success of antibody-drug conjugates further complements treatments with TRT, though challenges in treatment optimization continue.

[177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as first-line systemic therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a real-world study

PURPOSE

The use of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy has become increasingly recognized as a viable therapeutic approach for patients in the advanced stages of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, there is limited data regarding its effectiveness and safety in earlier lines. This study aims to present our institution's experience with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 as a first-line systemic therapy for mCRPC.

METHODS

We collected and analyzed data from consecutive mCRPC patients who underwent first-line treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 at our center from 2015 to 2023. The various outcome measures included best prostate-specific antigen-response rate (PSA-RR) (proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% decline in PSA); objective radiographic response rate (ORR) (proportion of patients achieving complete or partial radiographic responses); radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) (measured from treatment initiation until radiographic progression or death from any cause); overall survival (OS) (measured from treatment initiation until death from any cause); and adverse events.

RESULTS

Forty treatment-naïve mCRPC patients with PSMA-positive disease on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT were included (median age: 68.5 years, range: 45-78; median PSA: 41 ng/mL, range: 1-3028). These patients received a median cumulative activity of 22.2 GBq (range: 5.55-44.4) [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 over 1-6 cycles at 8-12 week intervals. A ≥ 50% decline in PSA was observed in 25/40 (62.5%) patients (best PSA-RR). Radiographic responses were evaluated for thirty-eight patients, with thirteen showing partial responses (ORR 34.2%). Over a median follow-up of 36 months, the median rPFS was 12 months (95% confidence interval, CI: 9-15), and the median OS was 17 months (95% CI: 12-22). Treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 anemia, leucopenia, and thrombocytopenia were noted in 4/40 (10%), 1/40 (2.5%), and 3/40 (7.5%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is a safe and effective option as a first-line treatment in mCRPC. Further trials are needed to definitively establish its role as an upfront treatment modality in this setting.

Prostate Cancer Theranostics With 177Lu-PSMA

This review paper highlights the transformative role of PSMA-targeted diagnostics and therapy in prostate cancer management, particularly focusing on 177Lu-PSMA-617, approved by the FDA and EMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients post-chemotherapy and ARPI treatment. Originating from the VISION trial's success, this paper navigates the current radioligand therapy (RLT) indications, emphasizing practical patient selection, planning, and treatment execution. It critically examines Lu-PSMA's comparative effectiveness against cabazitaxel and Ra-223, addressing decision-making dilemmas for mCRPC treatments. Furthermore, the paper discusses Lu-PSMA in chemotherapy-naïve patients and its application in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, underlined by ongoing global studies. A significant concern is Lu-PSMA's long-term safety profile, particularly nephrotoxicity risks, necessitating further investigation. The possibility of Lu-PSMA rechallenge in responsive patients is explored, stressing the need for comprehensive analyses and real-world data to refine treatment protocols. Conclusively, PSMA-targeted therapy marks a significant advance in prostate cancer therapy, advocating for its integration into a multimodal, patient-centric treatment approach. The review underscores the imperative for additional comparative studies to optimize treatment sequences and outcomes, ultimately enhancing long-term prognosis and disease control in prostate cancer management.

Assessing Response to PSMA Radiopharmaceutical Therapies with Single SPECT Imaging at 24 Hours After Injection

Understanding the relationship between lesion-absorbed dose and tumor response in 177Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) remains complex. We aimed to investigate whether baseline lesion-absorbed dose can predict lesion-based responses and to explore the connection between lesion-absorbed dose and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 50 patients with 335 index lesions undergoing 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT, who had dosimetry analysis performed on SPECT/CT at 24 h after cycles 1 and 2. First, we identified the index lesions for each patient and measured the lesion-based absorbed doses. Lesion-based response was calculated after cycle 2. Additionally, PSA50 response (a decline of 50% from baseline PSA) after cycle 2 was also calculated. The respective responses for mean and maximum absorbed doses and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) volumetric intensity product (VIP-PSMA) at cycles 1 and 2 were termed SPECTmean, SPECTmaximum, and SPECTVIP-PSMA, respectively. Results: Of the 50 patients reviewed, 46% achieved a PSA50 response after cycle 2. Of the 335 index lesions, 58% were osseous, 32% were lymph nodes, and 10% were soft-tissue metastatic lesions. The SPECT lesion-based responses were higher in PSA responders than in nonresponders (SPECTmean response of 46.8% ± 26.1% vs. 26.2% ± 24.5%, P = 0.007; SPECTmaximum response of 45% ± 25.1% vs. 19% ± 27.0%, P = 0.001; SPECTVIP-PSMA response of 49.2% ± 30.3% vs. 14% ± 34.7%, P = 0.0005). An association was observed between PSA response and SPECTVIP-PSMA response (R 2 = 0.40 and P < 0.0001). A limited relationship was found between baseline absorbed dose measured with a 24-h single time point and SPECT lesion-based response (R 2 = 0.05, P = 0.001, and R 2 = 0.03, P = 0.007, for mean and maximum absorbed doses, respectively). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, quantitative lesion-based response correlated with patient-level PSA response. We observed a limited relationship between baseline absorbed dose and lesion-based responses. Most of the variance in response remains unexplained solely by baseline absorbed dose. Establishment of a dose-response relationship in RPT with a single time point at 24 h presented some limitations.