1
|
Salani R, McCormack M, Kim YM, Ghamande S, Hall SL, Lorusso D, Barraclough L, Gilbert L, Guzman Ramirez A, Lu CH, Sabatier R, Colombo N, Hu Y, Krishnan V, Molinero L, Feng Y, Kim N, Castro M, Lin YG, Monk BJ. A non-comparative, randomized, phase II trial of atezolizumab or atezolizumab plus tiragolumab for programmed death-ligand 1-positive recurrent cervical cancer (SKYSCRAPER-04). Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005588. [PMID: 38858106 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate tiragolumab (anti-TIGIT) and atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) as second- or third-line therapy for PD-L1-positive persistent/recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS In the open-label, non-comparative, randomized phase II SKYSCRAPER-04 trial (NCT04300647), patients with PD-L1-positive (SP263 tumor area positivity ≥5%) recurrent/persistent cervical cancer after 1-2 chemotherapy lines (≥1 platinum-based) were randomized 3:1 to atezolizumab 1200 mg with/without tiragolumab 600 mg every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Stratification factors were performance status, prior (chemo)radiotherapy, and disease status. The primary endpoint was independent review committee-assessed confirmed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 in patients receiving tiragolumab plus atezolizumab. An objective response rate ≥21% (one-sample z-test p≤0.0245) was required for statistical significance versus a historical reference. RESULTS Protocol-defined independent review committee-assessed objective response rates were 19.0% (95% CI 12.6 to 27.0) in 126 patients receiving tiragolumab plus atezolizumab (p=0.0787 vs historical reference) and 15.6% (95% CI 6.5 to 29.5) in 45 atezolizumab-treated patients. Response rates were higher in PD-L1high (tumor area positivity ≥10%) than PD-L1low (tumor area positivity 5%-9%) subgroups with both regimens. At 8.5 months' median follow-up, independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.7 to 4.1) with tiragolumab plus atezolizumab and 1.9 months (95% CI 1.5 to 3.0) with atezolizumab. In post hoc analyses (10.4 months' median follow-up), median overall survival was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.6 to 14.5) with the combination and 10.6 months (95% CI 6.9 to 13.8) with atezolizumab (crossover permitted). In the combination group, 3% of patients had adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation and 8% had grade ≥3 adverse events of special interest; corresponding values in the single-agent arm were 4% and 11%. There were no treatment-related deaths or new safety findings. CONCLUSION The objective response rate with the tiragolumab-plus-atezolizumab combination was numerically higher than the historical reference but did not reach statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Salani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mary McCormack
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Yong-Man Kim
- Gynecologic Cancer Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
| | - Sharad Ghamande
- Georgia Cancer Center, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Shaundra L Hall
- National Cervical Cancer Coalition, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Lisa Barraclough
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lucy Gilbert
- The Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Chien-Hsing Lu
- Department of OB/GYN, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Renaud Sabatier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Aix-Marseille University, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Youyou Hu
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Yuning Feng
- Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Nicole Kim
- Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Yvonne G Lin
- Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Bradley J Monk
- Department of Oncology, HonorHealth University of Arizona College of Medicine and Creighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diggs A, Huang Y, Melamed A, Szamreta E, Monberg MJ, Hershman D, Wright JD. Patterns of use of primary and first-line chemotherapy for recurrence among patients with cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2023-004860. [PMID: 38851239 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about real-world patterns of chemotherapy use in patients with cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE To examine the patterns of chemotherapy use in patients with cervical cancer METHODS: We identified patients with cervical cancer in the IBM MarketScan Database who underwent primary hysterectomy or radiation therapy between 2011 and 2020 and described their treatment in the primary setting and at first recurrence. RESULTS We identified 5390 patients: 2667 (49.5%) underwent primary hysterectomy and 2723 (50.5%) primary radiotherapy. Among patients who underwent primary hysterectomy, 979 (36.7%) received adjuvant radiation, and 617 (23.1%) received primary chemotherapy. The most common chemotherapy regimens were single-agent platinum (51.7%), platinum combination therapy (42.9%), and non-platinum (3.4%). Among patients treated with primary radiation, 73.6% received primary/concurrent chemotherapy, either platinum alone (66.4% of those who received chemotherapy), platinum combinations (32.2%), or non-platinum (1.4%). The median duration of primary chemotherapy was 1.2 months. Therapy for recurrent cervical cancer was initiated in 959 patients. The most common regimens were platinum combination (63.9%), non-platinum cytotoxic agents (16.5%), single-agent platinum (14.9%), targeted therapy with bevacizumab (6.0%), and immunotherapy with pembrolizumab (3.2%). Overall, the proportion of patients treated with single-agent platinum therapy increased from 17.4% in 2011 to 32.1% in 2019, while platinum combinations decreased from 64.1% to 41.5% over the same years. Use of non-platinum agents increased from 18.5% in 2011 to 32.9% in 2018 and 26.4% in 2019. CONCLUSIONS Platinum-based chemotherapy is the most commonly used therapy in patients with cervical cancer in the primary setting and at the time of recurrence. The rate of use of non-platinum agents at first recurrence has increased over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Diggs
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yongmei Huang
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Dawn Hershman
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kuo HY, Khan KA, Kerbel RS. Antiangiogenic-immune-checkpoint inhibitor combinations: lessons from phase III clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:468-482. [PMID: 38600370 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00886-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
Antiangiogenic agents, generally antibodies or tyrosine-kinase inhibitors that target the VEGF-VEGFR pathway, are currently among the few combination partners clinically proven to improve the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This benefit has been demonstrated in pivotal phase III trials across different cancer types, some with practice-changing results; however, numerous phase III trials have also had negative results. The rationale for using antiangiogenic drugs as partners for ICIs relies primarily on blocking the multiple immunosuppressive effects of VEGF and inducing several different vascular-modulating effects that can stimulate immunity, such as vascular normalization leading to increased intratumoural blood perfusion and flow, and inhibition of pro-apoptotic effects of endothelial cells on T cells, among others. Conversely, VEGF blockade can also cause changes that suppress antitumour immunity, such as increased tumour hypoxia, and reduced intratumoural ingress of co-administered ICIs. As a result, the net clinical benefits from antiangiogenic-ICI combinations will be determined by the balance between the opposing effects of VEGF signalling and its inhibition on the antitumour immune response. In this Perspective, we summarize the results from the currently completed phase III trials evaluating antiangiogenic agent-ICI combinations. We also discuss strategies to improve the efficacy of these combinations, focusing on aspects that include the deleterious functions of VEGF-VEGFR inhibition on antitumour immunity, vessel co-option as a driver of non-angiogenic tumour growth, clinical trial design, or the rationale for drug selection, dosing and scheduling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hung-Yang Kuo
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, and Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Kabir A Khan
- Biological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Robert S Kerbel
- Biological Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tuninetti V, Virano E, Salutari V, Ricotti A, Pisano C, Ducceschi M, Turitto G, Scandurra G, Petrella MC, Forestieri V, Rizzetto M, Mammoliti S, Artioli G, Cioffi R, Borsotti L, Bellero M, Rognone C, Carbone V, Ferrandina G, Mantiero M, Azzolina C, Geninatti E, Pignata S, Valabrega G. Real-life efficacy and safety of cemiplimab in advanced cervical cancer from a nominal use program in Italy: The MITO 44 study. Eur J Cancer 2024; 203:114039. [PMID: 38598922 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND cemiplimab is an immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody targeting the programmed cell death-1 receptor. A nominal use program is available in Italy in advanced cervical cancer (CC) patients treated with platinum based chemotherapy based on the results of EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOTcx9 trial. This real-world, retrospective cohort, multicenter study aimed at describing clinical outcomes of patients with advanced CC treated with cemiplimab in Italy. METHODS The primary objective of the study was to assess the feasibility and the replicability of the initial results in a real world setting of cemiplimab nominal use. The primary endpoint of our analysis was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety data. RESULTS From March 2022 to December 2023, 135 patients were treated in 12 Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) Centers. Forty-two percent of patients had one or more comorbidities, hypertension being the most common (23.4%). Median PFS was 4.0 months (range 3.0-6.0) and median OS was 12.0 months (12.0- NR) with no differences according to PD-L1 status. Complete response (CR) or no evidence of disease (NED) were observed in 8.6%; partial response (PR) in 21.1%, stable disease (SD) in 14.8% and progression was recorded in 44.5% of patients. Most common drug related adverse events (AEs) were anemia (39.1%) and fatigue (27.8%). Immune related AEs occurred in 18.0%. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the feasibility and the replicability of the cemiplimab nominal use in advanced CC, in a real-world practice in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Tuninetti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Italy.
| | - Elisa Virano
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy
| | - Vanda Salutari
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Andrea Ricotti
- Clinical Trial, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, Italy
| | - Carmela Pisano
- Dipartimento Uro-Ginecologico, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli Fondazione G Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Giacinto Turitto
- Division of Oncology, AORN "Sant' Anna e San Sebastiano", Caserta, Italy
| | | | | | - Valeria Forestieri
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Monica Rizzetto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | | | | | - Raffaella Cioffi
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucia Borsotti
- Clinical Trial, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, 10128 Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Bellero
- SC Farmacia Ospedaliera, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, 10028 Turin, Italy
| | - Chiara Rognone
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Italy
| | - Vittoria Carbone
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- Department of Woman, Child and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Mara Mantiero
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | - Carmen Azzolina
- SC Direzione Sanitaria, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, 10028 Turin, Italy
| | - Eleonora Geninatti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Dipartimento Uro-Ginecologico, Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli Fondazione G Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Giorgio Valabrega
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tewari KS, Monk BJ. Immunotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy in cervical cancer management. Lancet 2024; 403:1310-1311. [PMID: 38521084 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00468-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Krishnansu S Tewari
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
| | - Bradley J Monk
- Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, West Palm Beach, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sitler CA, Tian C, Hamilton CA, Richardson MT, Chan JK, Kapp DS, Leath CA, Casablanca Y, Washington C, Chappell NP, Klopp AH, Shriver CD, Tarney CM, Bateman NW, Conrads TP, Maxwell GL, Phippen NT, Darcy KM. Immuno-Molecular Targeted Therapy Use and Survival Benefit in Patients with Stage IVB Cervical Carcinoma in Commission on Cancer ®-Accredited Facilities in the United States. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1071. [PMID: 38473428 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate IMT use and survival in real-world stage IVB cervical cancer patients outside randomized clinical trials. METHODS Patients diagnosed with stage IVB cervical cancer during 2013-2019 in the National Cancer Database and treated with chemotherapy (CT) ± external beam radiation (EBRT) ± intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) ± IMT were studied. The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk of death were estimated in patients treated with vs. without IMT after applying propensity score analysis to balance the clinical covariates. RESULTS There were 3164 evaluable patients, including 969 (31%) who were treated with IMT. The use of IMT increased from 11% in 2013 to 46% in 2019. Age, insurance, facility type, sites of distant metastasis, and type of first-line treatment were independently associated with using IMT. In propensity-score-balanced patients, the median survival was 18.6 vs. 13.1 months for with vs. without IMT (p < 0.001). The AHR was 0.72 (95% CI = 0.64-0.80) for adding IMT overall, 0.72 for IMT + CT, 0.66 for IMT + CT + EBRT, and 0.69 for IMT + CT + EBRT + ICBT. IMT-associated survival improvements were suggested in all subgroups by age, race/ethnicity, comorbidity score, facility type, tumor grade, tumor size, and site of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS IMT was associated with a consistent survival benefit in real-world patients with stage IVB cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Collin A Sitler
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Women's Services and The Ochsner Cancer Institute, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA 70115, USA
| | - Michael T Richardson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Los Angeles School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA 94010, USA
| | - Daniel S Kapp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Charles A Leath
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC 28204, USA
| | - Christina Washington
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma University Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Nicole P Chappell
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, GW Medical Faculty Associates, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | - Ann H Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Craig D Shriver
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Christopher M Tarney
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - George Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Women's Service Line, Inova Health System, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - Neil T Phippen
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ang DJM, Chan JJ. Evolving standards and future directions for systemic therapies in cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e65. [PMID: 38282261 PMCID: PMC10948986 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Several groundbreaking clinical trials with the potential to transform the management paradigm of both locally advanced and persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancers have been presented in 2023. This review describes the reported data from INTERLACE and KEYNOTE-A18 in the locally advanced setting, as well as BEATcc, innovaTV 301 and DESTINY-PanTumor02 for advanced disease. The practice implications of their positive results are interpreted in the context of global health considerations, and updated treatment algorithms are proposed. Furthermore, emerging trends in drug development for cervical cancer are discussed. As the routine use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for curative and palliative indications increases in the foreseeable future, patients whose cervical cancers which persist, relapse or progress after prior ICI exposure will represent an area of unmet clinical need and form the key target population for next-generation trials. Future research will help shape oncologists' approaches in the optimal selection, sequencing and re-treatment or rechallenge of immuno-oncology agents and/or antibody-drug conjugates in women with cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jack Junjie Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shim SH, Lee JY, Lee YY, Park JY, Lee YJ, Kim SI, Han GH, Yang EJ, Noh JJ, Yim GW, Son JH, Kim NK, Kim TH, Kong TW, Choi YJ, Cho A, Lim H, Jang EB, Cho HW, Suh DH. Major clinical research advances in gynecologic cancer in 2023: a tumultuous year for endometrial cancer. J Gynecol Oncol 2024; 35:e66. [PMID: 38330382 PMCID: PMC10948978 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
In the 2023 series, we summarized the major clinical research advances in gynecologic oncology based on communications at the conference of Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology Review Course. The review consisted of 1) Endometrial cancer: immune checkpoint inhibitor, antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), selective inhibitor of nuclear export, CDK4/6 inhibitors WEE1 inhibitor, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. 2) Cervical cancer: surgery in low-risk early-stage cervical cancer, therapy for locally advanced stage and advanced, metastatic, or recurrent setting; and 3) Ovarian cancer: immunotherapy, triplet therapies using immune checkpoint inhibitors along with antiangiogenic agents and PARP inhibitors, and ADCs. In 2023, the field of endometrial cancer treatment witnessed a landmark year, marked by several practice-changing outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the reliable efficacy of PARP inhibitors and ADCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung-Hyuk Shim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo-Young Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Yeol Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Jae Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gwan Hee Han
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Jung Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Joseph J Noh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ga Won Yim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Joo-Hyuk Son
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Nam Kyeong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Tae-Hyun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Tae-Wook Kong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Youn Jin Choi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Angela Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School of Jeju National University, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, Korea
| | - Hyunji Lim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Bi Jang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Institute of Medical Science, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Woong Cho
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Suh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kraus FBT, Sultova E, Heinrich K, Jung A, Westphalen CB, Tauber CV, Kumbrink J, Rudelius M, Klauschen F, Greif PA, König A, Chelariu-Raicu A, Czogalla B, Burges A, Mahner S, Wuerstlein R, Trillsch F. Genetics and beyond: Precision Medicine Real-World Data for Patients with Cervical, Vaginal or Vulvar Cancer in a Tertiary Cancer Center. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2345. [PMID: 38397025 PMCID: PMC10888648 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25042345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in molecular tumor diagnostics have transformed cancer care. However, it remains unclear whether precision oncology has the same impact and transformative nature across all malignancies. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-related gynecologic malignancies who underwent comprehensive molecular profiling and subsequent discussion at the interdisciplinary Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) of the University Hospital, LMU Munich, between 11/2017 and 06/2022. We identified a total cohort of 31 patients diagnosed with cervical (CC), vaginal or vulvar cancer. Twenty-two patients (fraction: 0.71) harbored at least one mutation. Fifteen patients (0.48) had an actionable mutation and fourteen (0.45) received a recommendation for a targeted treatment within the MTB. One CC patient received a biomarker-guided treatment recommended by the MTB and achieved stable disease on the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus for eight months. Factors leading to non-adherence to MTB recommendations in other patient cases included informed patient refusal, rapid deterioration, stable disease, or use of alternative targeted but biomarker-agnostic treatments such as antibody-drug conjugates or checkpoint inhibitors. Despite a remarkable rate of actionable mutations in HPV-related gynecologic malignancies at our institution, immediate implementation of biomarker-guided targeted treatment recommendations remained low, and access to targeted treatment options after MTB discussion remained a major challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian B. T. Kraus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Elena Sultova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - C. Benedikt Westphalen
- Department of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Christina V. Tauber
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Jörg Kumbrink
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Martina Rudelius
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Frederick Klauschen
- Institute of Pathology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp A. Greif
- Department of Medicine III, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69121 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander König
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Anca Chelariu-Raicu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Bastian Czogalla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Burges
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Sven Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Fabian Trillsch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mileshkin LR, Manoharan S. Improving survival from metastatic, recurrent, or persistent cervical cancer. Lancet 2024; 403:2-4. [PMID: 38048788 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02690-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Linda R Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
| | - Sathya Manoharan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|