INTESTINAL BIOPSY

Effect of forceps size and mode of orientation on endoscopic small bowel biopsy evaluation

Endoscopy is increasingly being used to obtain duodenal biopsy specimens in suspected small intestinal malabsorption. We have prospectively evaluated the effect of standard and jumbo biopsy forceps, as well as the mode of orientation of the specimens (naked eye or stereomicroscopy), on duodenal biopsy weight, length, depth, and orientation in 18 consecutive patients. A pair of biopsy specimens was obtained from each patient by each type of forceps in random order. After they had been weighed, one biopsy specimen from each pair was oriented stereomicroscopically and all four were blindly evaluated by two pathologists. The biopsy specimens obtained with the jumbo forceps were significantly larger (15.9 +/- 6.9 mg, mean +/- SD) and longer (0.6 +/- 0.2 cm) than those obtained with the standard forceps (8.0 +/- 1.3 mg, 0.4 +/- 0.2 cm, respectively; p < 0.001). Seventy-two percent of the jumbo biopsy specimens that were oriented with stereomicroscopy included a minimum of four villi in a row, as compared to 44% of the eye-oriented jumbo specimens and less than 39% of the standard specimens, irrespective of the mode of orientation (p = 0.02). These results indicate that the jumbo forceps is superior to the standard, because it produces a larger duodenal mucosal specimen, usually suitable for optimal histologic evaluation when oriented with stereomicroscopy.

Small bowel biopsy for malabsorption: comparison of the diagnostic adequacy of endoscopic forceps and capsule biopsy specimens

Biopsy specimens of the small bowel were obtained from 40 patients suspected of having malabsorption. Four different techniques were used at a single session--namely, endoscopic biopsy of the descending duodenum using paediatric and standard size forceps and suction capsule biopsy of the descending duodenum and the proximal jejunum. Specimens were compared for size, adequacy, and ability to confirm or exclude mucosal abnormality. Fourteen patients had villous atrophy. In all patients four biopsy specimens were obtained with paediatric endoscopic forceps and four with standard endoscopic forceps. No capsule biopsy specimen was retrieved from the duodenum in three patients and from the jejunum in five patients. Specimens were considered to be adequate in 36 patients when paediatric forceps were used, in 39 when standard forceps were used, in 28 on duodenal capsule biopsy, and in 32 on jejunal capsule biopsy. This study indicates that the most reliable method for diagnosing or excluding villous atrophy is endoscopic forceps biopsy of the descending duodenum, provided that at least four specimens are obtained with standard size forceps.

Endoscopic small intestinal biopsy

Ninety-three patients with suspected small bowel disease were investigated by duodenal forceps biopsy via a fiberoptic endoscope. Three biopsies were usually taken from the distal end of the second part of the duodenum, orientated on a square of plastic mesh, and examined by stereomicroscopy and histology. There were no failures or complications. Using strict criteria, sections from 56% of the 299 biopsies were satisfactory for histological interpretation (compared with 76% of 346 biopsies taken via a hydraulic multiple biopsy capsule from a separate group of patients). At least one biopsy was satisfactory from 87% of the patients. A previous study having shown that biopsies from this site are comparable to those from the conventional site at the duodenojejunal junction, it is concluded that endoscopic duodenal biopsy is a valid alternative to conventional suction biopsy and, moreover, has a number of advantages.

Peroral small-intestinal biopsy: experience with the hydraulic multiple biopsy instrument in routine clinical practice

Experience of the peroral, hydraulic, multiple, small-bowel biopsy instrument is recorded and compared with reported experience of other peroral biopsy instruments. It is concluded that, in routine clinical practice, there is no particular danger associated with this instrument despite warnings to the contrary. Furthermore, biopsies are obtained at least as quickly as with other instruments and with great reliability. Since this instrument also enables multiple, precisely located biopsies to be taken from various levels of the small intestine, it could be considered the instrument of choice for peroral jejunal biopsy.