Renal transplantation in the United Kingdom and Ireland--the centre effect

Patient and center characteristics associated with kidney transplant outcomes: a binational registry analysis

This registry-based study evaluated the contribution of center characteristics to kidney transplant outcomes in adult first kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand between 2004 and 2014. Primary outcomes were mortality and graft failure, and secondary outcomes were transplant complications. Overall, 6970 transplants from 17 centers were included. For deceased donor transplants, 5-year patient and graft survival rates varied considerably (81.0-93.9% and 72.2-88.3%, respectively). Variations in mortality and graft failure were partially reduced after adjustment for patient characteristics (1% and 20% reductions) and more markedly reduced after adjustment for center characteristics (41% and 55% reductions). For living donor transplants, 5-year patient and graft survival rates varied (89.7-100% and 79.2-96.9%, respectively). Centers with high average total ischemic times (>14 h) were associated with higher mortality for both deceased (adjusted hazard ratio [(AHR] 2.24, 95% CI 1.21-4.13) and living donor transplants (AHR 1.76, 95% CI 1.02-3.04). Small center size (<35 new kidney transplants/year) was associated with a lower hazard of mortality for living donor kidney transplants (AHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.81). No center characteristic was associated with graft failure. The appreciable variations in deceased donor kidney transplant recipient and graft survival outcomes across centers were attributable to center effects.

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Renal Transplantation: A Ten-Year Experience in a Single Center

Objective

To assess whether a renal graft outcome is dependent on the modality of dialysis prior to transplantation and to assess risk of peritonitis and catheterrelated problems posttransplantation.

Design

Retrospect analysis of the outcome of a first cadaveric renal transplantation from hemodialysis (HD) and CAPD patients over a ten-year period.

Patients

Out of a total of 905 renal transplants over a ten-year period, 699 were first grafts; 500 of these (241 on CAPD, 259 on hemodialysis) were analyzed while the remaining (incomplete data, predialysis, pediatric) were assessed for graft and patient survival only.

Main Outcome

Graft and patient survival cases were identical in the two groups (five-year graft survival: CAPD 67%, hemodialysis 66%; five-year patient survival: CAPD 88%, hemodialysis 87%). CAPD post transplant was necessary in 37 patients, while 10 developed peritonitis mostly related to CAPD use and responded to appropriate therapy. Routine catheter removal posttransplant was undertaken between 8 and 12 weeks.

Conclusion

Excellent graft and patient survival is achieved independent of the modality of dialysis prior to transplantation. Peritoneal dialysis can be used postgrafting, but there is a risk of peritonitis, which can be successfully managed with antibiotics and catheter removal. Great care is needed in executing the dialysis and catheter care after transplantation.

Center Variation and the Effect of Center and Provider Characteristics on Clinical Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

Background

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. While patient-level factors affecting survival are established, the presence of variation in the management of transplant recipients remains unknown.

Objective

The objective of this study was to examine center variation in kidney transplantation and identify center and provider characteristics that may be associated with clinical outcomes.

Design

This is a systematic review.

Data sources

Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception to June 2016 were used.

Study eligibility

Any study examining the association between center or provider characteristics and graft or patient survival, quality of life, or functional status were included.

Results

We identified 6327 records and 24 studies met eligibility. Most studies used data registries. Characteristics evaluated include center volume (n = 17), provider volume (n = 2), provider experience (n = 1), center type (n = 2), and location of follow-up (n = 1). Outcomes assessed included graft survival (n = 24) and patient survival (n = 9). Significant center variation was described in 12 of 15 and 5 of 7 studies for graft and patient survival. There was a significant and positive association between center volume and graft and patient survival in 8 and 2 studies, respectively. Provider experience and volume were significantly associated with less allograft loss and provider volume with lower risk of death. There was no association between graft survival and location of follow-up or center type.

Limitations

There was substantial heterogeneity in the variables assessed and methodology used to analyze associations.

Conclusion

This systematic review found center variation in kidney transplantation. Future studies in the current era are necessary to better evaluate this important topic.

"Nature versus nurture" study of deceased-donor pairs in kidney transplantation

Donor characteristics such as age and cause of death influence the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) and graft survival; however, the relative influence of donor characteristics ("nature") versus transplant center characteristics ("nurture") on deceased-donor kidney transplant outcomes is unknown. We examined the risks for DGF and allograft failure within 19,461 recipient pairs of the same donor's kidneys using data from the US Renal Data System. For the 11,894 common-donor pairs transplanted at different centers, a recipient was twice as likely to develop DGF when the recipient of the contralateral kidney developed DGF (odds ratio [OR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82 to 2.30). Similarly, for 7567 common-donor pairs transplanted at the same center, the OR for DGF was 3.02 (95% CI 2.62 to 3.48). For pairs transplanted at the same center, there was an additional 42% risk for DGF compared with pairs transplanted at different centers. After adjustment for DGF, the within-pair ORs for allograft failure by 1 yr were 1.92 (95% CI 1.33 to 2.77) and 1.77 (95% CI 1.25 to 2.52) for recipients who underwent transplantation at the same center and different centers, respectively. These data suggest that both unmeasured donor characteristics and transplant center characteristics contribute to the risk for DGF and that the former also contribute significantly to allograft failure.

Anaesthesia for renal transplant surgery

Renal transplantation is the preferred therapeutic option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Survival rates are much higher in patients who receive a transplant. Patients with renal failure have significant concomitant medical conditions, such as cardiovascular disease. This article provides an overview of the important issues to be considered in patients undergoing renal transplant, and discusses the anaesthetic management of these patients.

Centre-specific variation in renal transplant outcomes in Canada

BACKGROUND

The 'centre effect' has accounted for significant variation in renal allograft outcomes in the United States and Europe. To determine whether similar variation exists in Canada, we analysed mortality and graft failure (GF) rates among Canadian end-stage renal disease patients who received a renal allograft from 1988 to 1997 (n = 5082) across 20 transplant centres.

METHODS

Patients were followed from the date of transplantation to the time of GF and/or death. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate mortality and GF hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for relevant covariates, including centre volume. Centre-specific HRs were derived by comparing each centre's outcome rates against all others.

RESULTS

Twenty centres were included in the analysis. There was significant centre-specific variation in recipient and transplant characteristics (e.g. age, diabetes mellitus, donor source and centre volume) as well as covariate-adjusted facility-specific outcome rates. Facility-specific HRs for GF (including death with a functioning graft) ranged from 0.51 to 1.77, while mortality HRs (including death beyond GF) showed a similar spread (0.44-1.84). These HRs represent a 3- to 4-fold difference in transplant outcomes among the 20 centres studied. Centres performing less than 200 transplants over the study period were associated with lower graft and patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate significant centre-specific variation in the success of renal transplantation in Canada. Further studies are needed to elucidate the causes of this variation, with the goal of developing strategies to minimize the centre effect and ensure the best possible outcomes for all renal transplant recipients.

Assessing health-related quality of life pre- and post-liver transplantation: a prospective multicenter study

We report on a prospective multicenter study to assess pretransplantation and posttransplantation health-related quality of life (HRQL) of liver transplant recipients. HRQL was assessed at several timepoints using a self-completion questionnaire consisting of the EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) health status profile measure. All individuals selected to receive treatment as part of the UK NHS liver transplantation program at each of six liver transplantation centers in England and Wales during a 2-year period (n = 542) were eligible to be included on the study. An overall response rate of 84% (455 responses) was achieved. A paired comparison of HRQL at listing and 3 months posttransplantation showed statistically significant improvements (P <.05) in all dimensions of the SF-36 (with the exception of Bodily Pain [P =.686]) and the EQ-5D tariff and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. An analysis of posttransplantation HRQL over time for patients who survived until the end of the study (24 months posttransplantation) showed a statistically significant improvement (P <.05) for all dimensions of the SF-36 (apart from Mental Health [P =.245] and Role-Emotional dimensions [P =.265]) and the EQ-5D VAS and tariff scores. Adjusting for patients who died posttransplantation reduced mean EQ-5D tariff scores substantially, and the change over time in EQ-5D tariff scores was no longer statistically significant (P =.55). Results of regression analysis conducted to assess the importance of patient characteristics and center size on EQ-5D tariff and VAS scores generated posttransplantation indicated there was variation in scores according to patient age and center size.

A comparison of the effects of dialysis and renal transplantation on the survival of older uremic patients

BACKGROUND

Patients over age 60 constitute half of all new patients accepted into the renal replacement therapy programs in Australia. However, the optimal treatment of their end-stage renal disease remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare survival for dialysis and renal transplantation in older patients who were rigorously screened and considered eligible for transplantation.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of 174 consecutive patients over 60 who were accepted on to the Queensland cadaveric renal transplant waiting list between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 1997. Follow-up was terminated on October 1, 1998. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-transplant basis using a Cox regression model with time-varying explanatory variables. An alternative survival analysis was also performed, in which patients no longer considered suitable for transplantation were censored at the time of their removal from the waiting list.

RESULTS

There were 67 patients receiving a renal transplant, whereas the other 107 continued to undergo dialysis. These two groups were well matched at baseline with respect to age, gender, body mass index, renal disease etiology, comorbid illnesses, and dialysis duration and modality. The overall mortality rate was 0.096 per patient-year (0.131 for dialysis and 0.029 for transplant, P<0.001). Respective 1-, 3- and 5-year survivals were 92%, 62%, and 27% for the dialysis group and 98%, 95%, and 90% (P<0.01) for the transplant group. Patients in the transplant group had an adjusted hazard ratio 0.16 times that of the dialysis group (95% confidence interval 0.06-0.42). If patients were censored at the time of their withdrawal from the transplant waiting list, the adjusted hazard ratio was 0.24 (95% confidence interval 0.09-0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal transplantation seems to confer a substantial survival advantage over dialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure who are rigorously screened and considered suitable for renal transplantation.

Comparative audit between hospitals: the example of appendectomy

How useful are routine, comparative audit systems? To attempt to answer this question, data from a system in North West Thames were used. A common procedure was selected (appendectomy) and data supplied by 17 surgeons between January and June 1990 were analysed. Aspects of the case-mix, clinical management, diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes for the surgeons were compared. A total of 401 patients had been treated. All aspects of care varied between surgeons: mean age of patients (19-36 years), proportion of female patients (30-75 per cent), mean length of stay (2.1-7.1 days), prophylactic antibiotic use (0-85 per cent), diagnostic accuracy (40-100 per cent) and incidence of wound infections (0-4 per cent). As a result of the small sample sizes (mean number of cases per surgeon was 23.6) few of these differences were statistically significant. In addition, there were some doubts about the accuracy of some of the data. If such methodological difficulties can be overcome, comparative audit systems offer a practical and useful way of uncovering unusual clinical practices and generating hypotheses for evaluative research.

Day surgery: development of a national comparative audit service

OBJECTIVES

To develop software for hospitals to analyse their own survey data on patients' experiences of day surgery and to create and test the feasibility of a national comparative audit service.

DESIGN

Software development and testing; database analysis.

SETTING

Eleven general hospitals in England.

PATIENTS

1741 day surgery patients undergoing procedures during 1991-2.

MAIN MEASURES

Postoperative symptoms, complications, health and functional status, general satisfaction, and satisfaction with specific aspects of care.

RESULTS

Software for data entry and analysis by hospitals was successfully used at the pilot sites. The overall response rate for the 11 hospitals using the questionnaire was 60%, ranging from 33% to 90% depending on the way the survey was managed. Data from all 11 hospitals were included in the national comparative audit database. Hospitals showed little variation in measures of patients' overall satisfaction (around 85%), but significant differences were apparent for specific aspects such as receiving adequate written information before admission (range 50%-89%), provision of adequate parking facilities (14%-92%) and experiencing a significant amount of postoperative pain (8%-42%). The proportion of day case patients undergoing procedures that could have been performed in outpatient departments varied from 0 to 27% between hospitals. Further comparisons of outcome, in particular measures of effectiveness, must await the development of validated case mix adjustment methods.

CONCLUSION

Establishing a comparative audit database is feasible but several methodological problems remain to be resolved.

Volume and outcome of organ transplantation

In general, technically demanding medical procedures are associated with better outcomes when they are carried out in institutions and by physicians with higher volumes of practice. This paper examines the evidence for a volume-outcome relationship in the case of organ transplantation. Although few studies have been done on this subject, existing evidence is consistent with improved outcomes at higher volumes. Therefore, evidence supports policies that regionalize transplantation services.

Mechanism, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of renal transplant rejection

In recent years, there has been a steady progress in basic research (immunogenetics and cellular immunology) that helped us in understanding the mechanisms underlying allograft rejection. Several laboratory tests were developed, and the results were shown to correlate with clinical rejection. However, most of these studies have not found a place in clinical practice because of their nonspecificity, lack of sensitivity, time lag, added expense, and inconvenience. The commonly employed diagnostic tests (i.e., renal transplant ultrasound and 131I hippuran scintigram) are helpful in differentiating rejection from other causes of graft malfunction. The specific renal parenchymal disease, such as acute or chronic rejection or de novo or recurrent glomerular disease, contributing to graft malfunction can only be diagnosed by renal histopathologic study. Because hyperacute and accelerated acute rejections are irreversible and necessitate graft nephrectomy, measures should be taken to prevent this problem. High-dose corticosteroids still remain the mainstay of therapy for acute cellular rejection. In the case of steroid-resistant rejections, treatment with ALG or OKT3 appears promising. As there is no effective therapy for chronic allograft rejection, usual measures of delaying the progression of chronic renal failure should be employed, and patients should be advised to return to maintenance dialysis before they develop uremic symptoms. If current experiments demonstrating selective immunosuppression with monoclonal antibodies are found successful in human trials, one can expect further improvement in the outcome of renal transplantation.

Technical training in surgery: the trainee's view

A questionnaire designed to investigate the technical training of general surgical trainees was distributed throughout Scotland. A total of 222 questionnaires were sent out and 179 (81 per cent) were returned. Of the responders, 38 per cent felt that the overall operative workload was too small and the majority thought that there was too little emphasis on supervised operating. Two-thirds of trainees were generally satisfied with the amount of unsupervised operating, although a substantial proportion (21 per cent) sometimes felt out of their depth when performing delegated emergency operations. Few had attended craft workshops or travelled to other centres, but of those who had, most considered both activities to be very useful. Photographic atlases and videos were not generally felt to be of great value by those who had used them. The majority of trainees did not believe that research activity had interfered excessively with their technical training.

Transplants from living donors in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a centre survey

A survey was carried out to determine for the first time the extent of transplantation from living donors in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland and the views of transplant surgeons regarding future developments. Questionnaires were sent to 32 transplant centres representing 18 health regions and covered their extent of experience of transplantation, sources of donors, ages of donors and recipients, outcome of transplantation, and views on expansion of living donor transplantation services. Replies received from 27 transplant centres representing 17 health regions gave data on more than 1200 transplants from living donors. Transplants from living donors accounted for 0-25% of the total experience of health regions. Two centres had abandoned living donor transplantation. Sixty per cent of transplant surgeons favoured expansion of the living donor programme to meet a shortage of kidneys from cadavers, and the remainder thought that existing programmes were optimal. Living donor transplantation promises to be an important factor in the future planning of health care resources.

Use of older patients as cadaveric kidney donors

We have no fixed upper age limit for cadaveric kidney donors and donors over the age of 50 provided kidneys for 22 per cent of our adult transplant recipients between 1983 and 1986. Immediate function following transplantation occurred in 17 per cent of these kidneys compared with 58 per cent for kidneys from donors under the age of 50. The 1-year actuarial graft survival rate for transplants from donors over 50 was 52 per cent, compared with 70 per cent for transplants from donors under 50 (P less than 0.05). Thus kidneys from older donors make an important contribution to the total pool of organs available for transplantation, but their use leads to inferior results in comparison with kidneys from younger donors.

Perioperative blood transfusion and solid tumour recurrence

Evidence regarding the association of blood transfusions with recurrence of solid tumours is largely conflicting. This is perhaps unsurprising given the retrospective nature of the studies performed to date, the complexity of the disease and its treatment, and variations in local transfusion practices. Nonetheless, new data demonstrating that transfusions of whole blood, as opposed to red cell concentrates, are associated with earlier cancer recurrence are most readily explained by a cause and effect relationship. There is a growing literature documenting previously unforeseen immunologic consequences of homologous blood transfusion. These possible clinical consequences include earlier cancer recurrence and increased susceptibility to infection with bacteria and viruses. The questions raised in this review can be answered conclusively only by controlled prospective studies. For the present the prudent clinician will select red blood cells rather than whole blood for transfusion, employ autologous transfusions whenever feasible, and recognize that blood transfusion is a therapy with considerable benefits, but also considerable risks.

Perioperative blood transfusion and solid tumor recurrence--a review

Evidence regarding the association of blood transfusions with recurrence of solid tumors is largely conflicting. This is perhaps not surprising given the retrospective nature of the studies, the complexity of the disease and its treatment, and variations in local transfusion practices. Nonetheless, data demonstrating that transfusions of whole blood are associated with earlier cancer recurrence are most readily explained by a cause and effect relationship. There is a growing literature documenting previously unforeseen immunologic consequences of homologous blood transfusion. These possible clinical consequences may include earlier cancer recurrence, and increased susceptibility to infection with bacteria and viruses. The questions raised in this review will likely be answered by further studies. For the present, the prudent clinician will select red blood cells rather than whole blood for transfusion, and recognize that blood transfusion is a therapy with considerable benefits, but also considerable risks.

What causes center effects in kidney transplantation

Results in 195 renal transplants were compared for two distinct patient populations, those from the out-of-town surrounding rural region and those from the local large metropolitan center. The 1-year cadaver kidney survival was strikingly higher in the group from out-of-town (62% vs. 43%, p less than 0.001). This was partially due to better patient survival in the out-of-town patients. There were more blacks in the local group (7% vs. 48%, p less than 0.001). However, this was not the explanation for the difference, since within the local group the 1-year graft survival for nonblack recipients was no better than for blacks. Other relevant factors were not different between the two groups. This strong dialysis center effect, which exerts a major influence on the subsequent likelihood of success, derives from some factor related to the derivation of the recipient. In addition to its possible implications for patient care, further study of this phenomenon would also be useful with regard to recent interest on the part of government and other third-party payment groups in transplant center results.

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and renal transplantation: a five year experience

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is a new and increasingly popular method of routine dialysis, but its effect on renal transplantation is uncertain. A non-randomised comparison was made of the outcome of grafting in patients who had been treated before transplantation with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with that in patients treated with haemodialysis. During the five years, 1979-84, after continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was introduced to Newcastle upon Tyne 220 patients have received transplants after either continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (61 patients) or haemodialysis (159 patients). During follow up no significant differences occurred in survival of patients or grafts between the two treatment groups. One year after transplantation the percentages of survivors who had received continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis were 88% and 91% respectively, and overall graft survival was 66% and 72%, respectively. A multiple regression model was used to allow for differences among patients--for example, duration of dialysis and number of preoperative transfusions--on the survival of grafts. When only first cadaver grafts were considered (in 152 patients) graft survival (non-immunological failures excluded) was not significantly different between the patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is not a risk factor in renal transplantation, and its continued use in treatment of potential renal graft recipients is recommended.

CAPD and renal transplantation

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is believed to improve the immune competence of end-stage renal failure patients and to increase the risk of graft rejection following subsequent renal transplantation. At this centre, 220 consecutive renal transplants have been studied in patients treated by either CAPD or haemodialysis (HD). Patient and graft survival was not significantly different for the two treatment groups over a five year follow-up. When only first cadaver recipients were considered (152 grafts) one-year graft survival (non-immunological failures excluded) was 77 per cent for CAPD and 79 per cent for HD patients (P greater than 0.05). Time on dialysis and number of pre-operative transfusions were significantly greater for the HD patients (P less than 0.05). A group of HD and CAPD patients were identified as being matched for age, sex, HLA, A, B, DR antigen matches, pre-operative transfusions and time-on dialysis. One-year graft survival of the CAPD patients was 82 per cent and for the HD patients 61 per cent. Studies of patient lymphocyte function and plasma suppressive activity in vitro revealed no differences between CAPD and HD treated patients. CAPD is not an immunological risk factor in renal transplantation and its continued use in the preparation of patients for transplantation is recommended.