1
|
Acevedo F, Armengol VD, Deng Z, Tang R, Coopey SB, Braun D, Yala A, Barzilay R, Li C, Colwell A, Guidi A, Cetrulo CL, Garber J, Smith BL, King T, Hughes KS. Pathologic findings in reduction mammoplasty specimens: a surrogate for the population prevalence of breast cancer and high-risk lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2018; 173:201-207. [PMID: 30238276 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-4962-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 09/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mammoplasty removes random samples of breast tissue from asymptomatic women providing a unique method for evaluating background prevalence of breast pathology in normal population. Our goal was to identify the rate of atypical breast lesions and cancers in women of various ages in the largest mammoplasty cohort reported to date. METHODS We analyzed pathologic reports from patients undergoing bilateral mammoplasty, using natural language processing algorithm, verified by human review. Patients with a prior history of breast cancer or atypia were excluded. RESULTS A total of 4775 patients were deemed eligible. Median age was 40 (range 13-86) and was higher in patients with any incidental finding compared to patients with normal reports (52 vs. 39 years, p = 0.0001). Pathological findings were detected in 7.06% (337) of procedures. Benign high-risk lesions were found in 299 patients (6.26%). Invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ were detected in 15 (0.31%) and 23 (0.48%) patients, respectively. The rate of atypias and cancers increased with age. CONCLUSION The overall rate of abnormal findings in asymptomatic patients undergoing mammoplasty was 7.06%, increasing with age. As these results are based on random sample of breast tissue, they likely underestimate the prevalence of abnormal findings in asymptomatic women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Acevedo
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - V Diego Armengol
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Zhengyi Deng
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Rong Tang
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Suzanne B Coopey
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Danielle Braun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Adam Yala
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Regina Barzilay
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Clara Li
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.,Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy Colwell
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Anthony Guidi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Curtis L Cetrulo
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Judy Garber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Barbara L Smith
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Tari King
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Kevin S Hughes
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 7, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prevalence of incidental breast cancer and precursor lesions in autopsy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2017; 17:808. [PMID: 29197354 PMCID: PMC5712106 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3808-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Autopsy studies demonstrate the prevalence pool of incidental breast cancer in the population, but estimates are uncertain due to small numbers in any primary study. We aimed to conduct a systematic review of autopsy studies to estimate the prevalence of incidental breast cancer and precursors. Methods Relevant articles were identified through searching PubMed and Embase from inception up to April 2016, and backward and forward citations. We included autopsy studies of women with no history of breast pathology, which included systematic histological examination of at least one breast, and which allowed calculation of the prevalence of incidental breast cancer or precursor lesions. Data were pooled using logistic regression models with random intercepts (non-linear mixed models). Results We included 13 studies from 1948 to 2010, contributing 2363 autopsies with 99 cases of incidental cancer or precursor lesions. More thorough histological examination (≥20 histological sections) was a strong predictor of incidental in-situ cancer and atypical hyperplasia (OR = 126·8 and 21·3 respectively, p < 0·001), but not invasive cancer (OR = 1·1, p = 0·75). The estimated mean prevalence of incidental cancer or precursor lesion was 19·5% (0·85% invasive cancer + 8·9% in-situ cancer + 9·8% atypical hyperplasia). Conclusion Our systematic review in ten countries over six decades found that incidental detection of cancer in situ and breast cancer precursors is common in women not known to have breast disease during life. The large prevalence pool of undetected cancer in-situ and atypical hyperplasia in these autopsy studies suggests screening programs should be cautious about introducing more sensitive tests that may increase detection of these lesions.
Collapse
|
3
|
Segnan N, Minozzi S, Armaroli P, Cinquini M, Bellisario C, González-Lorenzo M, Gianola S, Ponti A. Epidemiologic evidence of slow growing, nonprogressive or regressive breast cancer: A systematic review. Int J Cancer 2016; 139:554-73. [PMID: 27004723 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Revised: 02/15/2016] [Accepted: 03/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The general aim of this systematic review is to mitigate breast cancer (BC) overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The specific aim is to summarize available data on the occurrence and features of indolent invasive or in situ (DCIS) BC, and precisely survival of untreated cases, prevalence of occult cancers found in autopsies, frequency of regressive BC. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were systematically searched up to 3/31/2014. Eligibility criteria were: cohort studies, case-control studies, uncontrolled case series assessing survival in women with a diagnosis of BC who did not receive treatment compared to treated women; case series of autopsies estimating the prevalence of undiagnosed BC; cohort studies, case-control studies, uncontrolled case series, case reports assessing the occurrence of spontaneous regression of BC in women with a confirmed histology diagnosis. Untreated BC: 8 cohort studies and 12 case series (3593 BC) were included. In three controlled cohort studies (diagnoses 1978-2006), the 5-years overall survival was 19-43%. Occult BC: 8 case series (2279 autopsies) were included. The prevalence of invasive BC undiagnosed during lifetime range was 0-1.5%, while for DCIS the range was 0.2-14.7%. Spontaneous regression: 2 cohort studies, 3 case reports, 1 case series included. In the cohort studies the relative risk of regression for screen detected compared with nonscreened BC was estimated as 1.2 and 1.1. It seems plausible that around 10% of invasive BC are not symptomatic during life, and that one fith of BC patients if untreated would be alive after 5 years. Around 1 of 10 screen-detected BC may regress according two studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nereo Segnan
- Department of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino,", Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Minozzi
- Department of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino,", Turin, Italy
| | - Paola Armaroli
- Department of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino,", Turin, Italy
| | - Michela Cinquini
- Department of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino,", Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina Bellisario
- Department of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino,", Turin, Italy
| | - Marien González-Lorenzo
- Department of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino,", Turin, Italy
| | - Silvia Gianola
- Department of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino,", Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Ponti
- Department of Cancer Screening, Centre for Epidemiology and Prevention in Oncology (CPO), University Hospital "Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino,", Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chan CK, Wells CK, McFarlane MJ, Feinstein AR. More lung cancer but better survival. Implications of secular trends in "necropsy surprise" rates. Chest 1989; 96:291-6. [PMID: 2787730 DOI: 10.1378/chest.96.2.291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
In previous research, we have demonstrated the value of using necropsy "surprise" lung cancer cases, in those in whom lung cancer was not suspected during life, to estimate the size and composition of the "reservoir" of undetected lung cancer in the general population. The current research was done to determine the characteristics and consequences of secular changes over time in the composition of the lung cancer "reservoir." The results suggest that further advances in diagnostic technology will enhance detection during life of the large "reservoir" of resectable lung cancer, particularly in women. With the increased detection of these reservoir cases during life, the statistical occurrence rates for lung cancer will seem to increase, but survival rates will seem to improve because more of the detected cases will be resectable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C K Chan
- Department of Medicine, Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|