Lipoprotein (a) and coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia

Lipoprotein(a) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

The role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HFH) is unclear. We sought to examine the utility of this lipoprotein as a predictor of CVD outcomes in the HFH population at our lipid clinic.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of clinical and laboratory data from a large multiethnic cohort of HFH patients at a single, large lipid clinic in Vancouver, Canada. Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were diagnosed with possible, probable, or definite HFH by strict clinical diagnostic criteria. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to study the relationship between several established CVD risk factors, Lp(a), and the age of first hard CVD event.

RESULTS

An Lp(a) concentration of 800 units/L (560 mg/L) or higher was a significant independent risk factor for CVD outcomes [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.53-4.39; P < 0.001]. Other significant risk factors were male sex [HR = 3.19 (1.79-5.69); P < 0.001] and ratio of total to HDL-cholesterol [1.18 (1.07-1.30); P = 0.001]. A previous history of smoking or hypertension each produced HRs consistent with increased CVD risk [HR = 1.55 (0.92-2.61) and 1.57 (0.90-2.74), respectively], but neither reached statistical significance (both P = 0.10). LDL-cholesterol was not an independent predictor of CVD risk [HR = 0.85 (0.0.71-1.01); P = 0.07], nor was survival affected by the subcategory of HFH diagnosis (i.e., possible vs probable vs definite HFH).

CONCLUSION

Lp(a) is an independent predictor of CVD risk in a multiethnic HFH population.

Family history of early cardiovascular disease in children with moderate to severe hypercholesterolemia: relationship to lipoprotein (a) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels

Lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) is an established cardiovascular risk factor in adults. We sought to evaluate whether raised Lp(a) levels were predictive of a family history of early cardiovascular disease (CVD) in children already at increased risk for premature atherosclerosis because of elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Lp(a) and serum lipid levels were measured in 69 children and offspring with established moderate to severe hypercholesterolemia (serum cholesterol > 170 mg/dL) who were aged 10.7 +/- 4.3 years (range 1.5 to 21 years) and had been referred to a pediatric lipid center. The children represented families with a positive (n = 27) or negative (n = 42) history for premature CVD (<55 years of age in parent or grandparent). In all children, Lp(a) levels ranged from 1 to 140 mg/dL, with a median of 29 mg/dL. Mean total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were 234 mg/dL, 166 mg/dL, and 45 mg/dL, respectively. There was no difference in median Lp(a) levels between the children with a positive family history and those with a negative family history (29.9 mg/dL vs 29.0 mg/dL, respectively). In contrast, children with a positive family history showed significantly higher LDL cholesterol levels (186 +/- 61 mg/dL vs 153 +/- 52 mg/dL, P = .02). Thus, in this group of hypercholesterolemic children, LDL cholesterol but not Lp(a) levels were associated with a family history of premature CVD. Further studies are needed to identify additional specific risk factors associated with the development of CVD in this population.

Plasma lipoprotein(a) is an independent factor associated with carotid wall thickening in severely but not moderately hypercholesterolemic patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate whether high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) may promote the atherogenic effect of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], we investigated the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and thickening of intima plus media in the common carotid artery (CC-IMT) in patients with different degrees of hypercholesterolemia.

METHODS

One hundred type II hypercholesterolemic patients and 25 normolipidemic subjects were selected for the study. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels were determined enzymatically; Lp(a) levels were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. An Lp(a) concentration > 30 mg/dL was arbitrarily considered a risk factor. For each patient mean CC-IMT was determined by B-mode ultrasound; in 60 patients and in the 25 control subjects, the maximal IMT in the entire carotid tree was also determined.

RESULTS

CC-IMT values were higher in hypercholesterolemic patients with plasma Lp(a) levels > 30 mg/dL than in those with lower levels (P < .01). CC-IMT and maximal IMT directly and independently correlated with plasma levels of Lp(a) (r = .33 and r = .25, respectively; both P < .05). The effect of LDL-C concentrations on the relationship between IMT and Lp(a) was investigated by dividing the patients into quartiles of plasma LDL-C levels. After stratification, CC-IMT significantly correlated with plasma Lp(a) levels in the patients with severe hypercholesterolemia (LDL-C > 5.2 mmol/L) but not in patients in the lowest quartile, ie, those with moderate hypercholesterolemia. No correlation between CC-IMT and Lp(a) was found in normolipidemic control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated plasma levels of Lp(a) can be considered an additional independent factor associated with thickening of the common carotid arteries in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia but not in those with moderate hypercholesterolemia or in normocholesterolemic subjects.

Race and gender differences in the association of Lp(a) with carotid artery wall thickness. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

The association of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] with preclinical atherosclerotic disease is not well established in any race group, particularly African Americans. This report examined the association of Lp(a) with preclinical extracranial carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged black and white participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Study participants (15 124: 2417 black women, 1522 black men, 5907 white women, and 5278 white men) who were 45 to 64 years old at baseline were examined during the period 1987 to 1989. Carotid intimal-medial far-wall thickness was determined by B-mode ultrasonography and expressed as the overall wall thickness mean at six sites to approximate atherosclerosis in the carotid system. Lp(a) was measured as its total protein component, Lp(a) protein, by a double-antibody ELISA for apolipoprotein(a) detection. Mean Lp(a) protein levels were higher in blacks than whites (169.1 and 147.0 microgram/mL in black women and black men, respectively, compared with 86.6 and 75.1 micrograms/mL in white women and white men). Mean carotid wall thickness (in millimeters) varied by race and gender: 0.798 in white men, 0.779 in black men, 0.718 in black women and 0.695 in white women. Multivariable-adjusted Lp(a) protein was independently associated with wall thickness (in millimeters) in white men and black men; among women, however, this association appeared to be stronger when smoking and diabetes were present. A 100-microgram/mL difference in Lp(a) protein was associated with 0.049- and 0.043-mm higher wall thickness values in black men and white men, respectively. Among white women who smoked, the difference in wall thickness was 0.051 mm compared with 0.032 mm for former/never smokers and 0.21 mm in black female diabetics compared with 0.031 mm in black female nondiabetics. These results suggest that Lp(a) is associated with preclinical carotid atherosclerosis in both blacks and whites, but that this association may be affected by the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors, particularly in women.

Lp(a) levels and atherosclerotic vascular disease in a sample of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia sharing the same gene defect

There is considerable variation in the severity of cardiovascular disease among patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Some reports have suggested that plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels may explain such variation and that FH subjects deficient in LDL receptors, especially those with coronary heart disease, tend to have elevated Lp(a) levels. We have investigated the possible role of the LDL receptor in determining plasma Lp(a) levels in genetically homogeneous FH population and the contribution of Lp(a) to cardiovascular risk. A total of 98 FH subjects and 66 healthy first- and second-degree relatives from 30 families with FH due to the French-Canadian > 10-kilobase deletion of the LDL receptor gene were studied. A reference group of 392 normolipidemic French-Canadian participants in a Heart Health Survey was used for comparison. FH subjects were subdivided into subsets of 63 individuals free from atherosclerotic vascular disease (AVD) and 35 individuals with AVD. A complete cardiovascular evaluation was performed, and plasma lipid, lipoprotein, and Lp(a) levels were measured in all subjects in the absence of medication. Apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] phenotype was determined in 112 of FH and non-FH subjects. The log-transformed values for plasma Lp(a) were not significantly different among the three groups: 0.98 +/- 0.54 (mean +/- SD) in FH subjects with AVD, 0.89 +/- 0.51 in FH subjects without AVD, and 0.82 +/- 0.64 in their relatives. The distribution of the apo(a) phenotypes did not differ between the FH and non-FH groups. Comparison of two age- and sex-matched subgroups of FH subjects, with and without AVD, failed to show any differences in Lp(a) level. However, mean Lp(a) log values in the reference group (n = 392) were significantly lower than values obtained for the total FH group (0.79 +/- 0.57 versus 0.92 +/- 0.52, respectively; P < .05) but were not different from those of the unaffected family members. Thus, in our sample, the LDL receptor appears not to influence plasma Lp(a) levels; rather, these levels reflect shared apo(a) genes. The cardiovascular risk in this group of subjects with FH was related to age, male sex, total and LDL cholesterol, and higher apoB but not Lp(a) levels.

Lp(a) concentration and apo(a) isoform size. Relation to the presence of coronary artery disease in familial hypercholesterolemia

We studied the relation between the concentration of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in plasma, apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] phenotype, and the clinical expression of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a previously described cohort of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and an appropriate population of control subjects. The plasma concentration of Lp(a) was markedly skewed in both the FH and control populations; however, the distribution was less skewed in FH (50% greater than 300 mg/L) compared with control subjects (27% greater than 300 mg/L). Patients with FH had significantly higher median and mean log Lp(a) levels compared with control subjects. There was no difference in the level of Lp(a) between men and women in both the control and FH groups. Frequency distribution analysis of the major apo(a) isoform size for each subject showed that, in contrast to the near-normal distribution seen in control subjects, two major subpopulations were apparent in the FH cohort, based on apo(a) isoform size > 700 kD or < or = 700 kD. There was no correlation between Lp(a) plasma concentration and apo(a) isoform size in either population. FH subjects with smaller apo(a) isoforms were more likely to have a history of signs of, or symptoms of CAD than those with larger isoforms. These data illustrate that on the basis of Lp(a) plasma concentration alone, there is no significant difference between FH patients with and without signs or symptoms of CAD. In the control population the smaller apo(a) isoforms were associated with higher Lp(a) levels, whereas in the FH population both small and large apo(a) isoforms were associated with higher Lp(a) levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Lipoprotein[a] as a risk factor for preclinical atherosclerosis

Elevated mean levels of lipoprotein[a] (Lp[a]) have been associated with symptomatic cardiovascular diseases such as clinically manifest myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery disease, restenosis of coronary artery vein grafts after bypass, and a family history of MI. Associations of Lp[a] with arterial wall thickening in asymptomatic individuals previously have not been addressed and are evaluated in this report among participants of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Intima-media wall thickening in the extracranial carotid arteries was assessed noninvasively with B-mode ultrasonography; Lp[a] was measured as its total protein component. Individuals with wall thickening > or = 90th percentile of the population maximum far-wall thickness were pair matched to participants < 75th percentile of wall thickness by race, gender, center, 10-year age group, and time of examination. These selection criteria yielded 492 matched pairs, with 395 white pairs and 97 black pairs. The mean Lp[a] protein level for all black participants was 174.6 micrograms/mL compared with 77.8 micrograms/mL for whites. Conditional logistic regression analysis for the association of Lp[a] with case-control status yielded a statistically significant prevalence odds ratio (OR) estimate of 1.49, based on a 1-SD difference in Lp[a] protein, after adjusting for age, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fibrinogen, hypertension, and cigarette smoking. None of these risk factors significantly altered the OR, in agreement with reports that Lp[a] is unaffected by environmental influences. In addition, no differential effect of Lp[a] protein on case-control status (effect modification) was observed by race, gender, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or fibrinogen in this population.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Relationships between lipoprotein(a), lipids, apolipoproteins, basal and stimulated fibrinolytic regulators, and D-dimer

In 191 newly referred hyperlipidemic patients, our specific aim was to assess relationships between levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], lipids, apolipoproteins, regulators of basal and stimulated fibrinolytic activity, and D-dimer, a measure of in vivo fibrinolysis. Lp(a) levels correlated with none of the measures of basal fibrinolytic regulators or D-dimer. In 25 patients, levels of stimulated regulators of fibrinolytic activity and D-dimer were measured after 10-minute cuff venous occlusion. Lp(a) levels again correlated with none of the stimulated regulators of fibrinolytic activity or D-dimer. However, both basal and stimulated levels of fibrinolytic regulators and D-dimer were closely related to other major risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) including triglyceride, apolipoprotein (apo) A1, apo B, Quetelet index (QI), and sex. By stepwise regression in 191 patients, the following standardized partial regression coefficients were significant (P < or = .05), and model R2 and P values were as follows: basal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) with apo B-.18, with time .17, with QI -.28, R2 = 17%, P < or = .0001; basal plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) with apo B..25, with time -.15, with QI .17, R2 = 14%, P < or = .0001; basal alpha 2-antiplasmin with apo A1.14, with apo B.24, with QI.17, with sex .30, R2 = 25%, P < .0001; basal plasminogen with A1.15, with apo B.21, with QI.17, with sex.17, R2 = 15%, P < or = .0001; basal fibrinogen with Lp(a).17, with QI.21, with sex.26, R2 = 14%, P < or = .0001; D-dimer with sex.15, R2 = 21%, P < or = .048. Given the absence of any relationship between Lp(a) levels and inhibition or stimulation of fibrinolysis regulators or D-dimer either in the basal or stimulated state, we postulate that Lp(a)'s major atherogenic effects are mediated by mechanisms other than reduction of fibrinolysis stimulation or in vivo fibrinolysis.

Automated measurement of lipoprotein(a) by immunoturbidimetric analysis

Immunoturbidimetric analysis of lipoprotein(a) in plasma or serum was developed for use on the Roche COBAS FARA II and COBAS MIRA clinical chemistry analyzers. The components of the assay are: (1) buffer consisting of 2.25% polyethylene glycol in phosphate-buffered saline, 0.2% gelatin, and a surfactant; (2) fractionated goat anti-human lipoprotein(a) IgG; (3) five standards with lipoprotein(a) concentrations ranging from 0.05 to 1.0 g/l; (4) two controls with concentrations of approximately 0.2 and 0.5 g/l. The analyzer delivers sample and buffer, incubates the reaction mixture at 37 degrees C for 5 min, delivers neat lipoprotein(a) antibody, and incubates for an additional 10 min. The lipoprotein(a) concentration of samples is calculated by the COBAS DENS (Data Evaluation for Non-linear Standard Curves) option by fitting the standard curve values to a four-parameter logit-log curve model. Total imprecision results (CV%) for the FARA II and MIRA were under 11% (NCCLS protocol EP5-T). The assay is linear beyond the highest calibrator to 2.6 g/l. No interference was observed for plasminogen up to 2.3 g/l, apolipoprotein B up to 4.36 g/l, hemoglobin up to 10 g/l, bilirubin up to 4.0 g/l, and triglycerides up to 4.36 g/l. Comparison with a double monoclonal ELISA used at the Northwest Lipid Research Laboratories yielded: R = 0.970, slope = 1.013, and y-intercept = 0.00009 (n = 37). Comparison with a commercially available ELISA kit for lipoprotein(a) yielded: r = 0.987, slope = 1.243, and y-intercept = 0.024 (n = 40). This assay provides rapid, accurate, and precise screening of lipoprotein(a) in serum or plasma.

A competitive ELISA for lipoprotein(a)

A competitive ELISA for lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is described. The method uses a commercially available polyclonal anti-Lp(a) antibody and an IgG biotinstreptavidin-horseradish peroxidase detection system. The method is simple and robust with an assay sensitivity of 0.7 ng/well (1.4 micrograms/l). The antibody cross-reactivity was 0.14% against LDL and 0.70% against plasminogen. The coefficients of variation obtained with control sera of 266 and 552 mg/l were: 5.0% and 4.6% (n = 6), respectively for the intraassay; and 10.8% and 9.5% (n = 16), respectively for the interassay. The method showed an excellent correlation with a commercial immunoradiometric assay (IRMA), y (ELISA) = 0.94x (IRMA) - 8, (r = 0.98). A recovery study in which a 200 mg/L standard and four plasma samples were diluted with different proportions of a low plasma sample, gave linear relationships and also confirmed the specificity of the antibody.

A comparison of commercial kits for the measurement of lipoprotein(a)

Five commercial kits for the assay of lipoprotein(a) were investigated and two of these, the Immuno Enzyquick and Biopool TintElize, both enzyme-linked immunoassays, were studied in detail. Whilst there was a strong correlation between the results obtained using the two methods there was a significant difference between the absolute values. In view of its higher precision at low levels and robust performance, the Enzyquick kit (Immuno Ltd) was selected for use in this laboratory.

Reduction in coronary heart disease: clinical and anatomical considerations

Coronary artery bypass surgery, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction have relieved symptoms, preserved myocardium, and prolonged life but have not modified the progression of atherosclerosis in the coronary arteries. In the last 10 years, however, progress has been made in establishing the cholesterol-atherogenesis hypothesis. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that the higher the total plasma cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), the greater the risk that coronary artery disease will develop. Recently, clinical trials including the Coronary Drug Project, the Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial (LRC-CPPT), and the Helsinki Heart Study provided evidence that lowering cholesterol reduces the frequency of fatal and nonfatal coronary events. In addition, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Type II Coronary Intervention Study and the Cholesterol Lowering Atherosclerosis Study demonstrated that lowering of cholesterol was associated with a decreased incidence of progression of coronary disease, as well as with the potential for reduction in the atherosclerotic plaque. Beneficial effects of diet and lifestyle changes also have an important effect on atherosclerosis. The impact of lowering cholesterol has been limited primarily by pharmacologic programs which lower cholesterol only 10-20% and are associated with a high incidence of intolerable side effects. With the recent introduction of the HmG co-A reductase inhibitors and their more profound effect on serum lipids, it may be possible to further promote plaque regression. The future of all these interventions, however, must still be assessed by overall mortality; studies to date have demonstrated beneficial effects on cardiovascular mortality but age-adjusted total mortality has remained unchanged. Future management of patients with acute and chronic coronary artery disease will involve a collaboration of cardiologists, endocrinologists, and epidemiologists to coordinate screening, recognition, and treatment of this disease.