Adjuvant portal-vein infusion of fluorouracil and heparin in colorectal cancer: a randomised trial. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group, the Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Interventi in Oncologia, and the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research

Helminth-derived molecules improve 5-fluorouracil treatment on experimental colon tumorigenesis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent fatal neoplasias worldwide. Despite efforts to improve the early diagnosis of CRC, the mortality rate of patients is still nearly 50%. The primary treatment strategy for CRC is surgery, which may be accompanied by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The conventional and first-line chemotherapeutic agent utilized is 5-fluorouracil (5FU). However, it has low efficiency. Combination treatment with leucovorin and oxaliplatin or irinotecan improves the effectiveness of 5FU therapy. Unfortunately, most patients develop drug resistance, leading to disease progression. Here, we evaluated the effect of a potential alternative adjuvant treatment for 5FU, helminth-derived Taenia crassiceps (TcES) molecules, on treating advanced colitis-associated colon cancer. The use of TcES enhanced the effects of 5FU on established colonic tumors by downregulating the expression of the immunoregulatory cytokines, Il-10 and Tgf-β, and proinflammatory cytokines, Tnf-α and Il-17a, and reducing the levels of molecular markers associated with malignancy, cyclin D1, and Ki67, both involved in apoptosis inhibition and the signaling pathway of β-catenin. TcES+5FU therapy promoted NK cell recruitment and the release of Granzyme B1 at the tumor site, consequently inducing tumor cell death. Additionally, it restored P53 activity which relates to decreased Mdm2 expression. In vitro assays with human colon cancer cell lines showed that therapy with TcES+5FU significantly reduced cell proliferation and migration by modulating the P53 and P21 signaling pathways. Our findings demonstrate, for the first time in vivo, that helminth-derived excreted/secreted products may potentiate the effect of 5FU on established colon tumors.

Effect of intra-operative chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin on the survival of patients with colorectal cancer after radical surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The effect of intra-operative chemotherapy (IOC) on the long-term survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the independent effect of intra-operative infusion of 5-fluorouracil in combination with calcium folinate on the survival of CRC patients following radical resection.

METHODS

1820 patients were recruited, and 1263 received IOC and 557 did not. Clinical and demographic data were collected, including overall survival (OS), clinicopathological features, and treatment strategies. Risk factors for IOC-related deaths were identified using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. A regression model was developed to analyze the independent effects of IOC.

RESULTS

Proportional hazard regression analysis showed that IOC (hazard ratio [HR]=0.53, 95% confidence intervals [CI] [0.43, 0.65], P  < 0.001) was a protective factor for the survival of patients. The mean overall survival time in IOC group was 82.50 (95% CI [80.52, 84.49]) months, and 71.21 (95% CI [67.92, 74.50]) months in non-IOC group. The OS in IOC-treated patients were significantly higher than non-IOC-treated patients ( P  < 0.001, log-rank test). Further analysis revealed that IOC decreased the risk of death in patients with CRC in a non-adjusted model (HR=0.53, 95% CI [0.43, 0.65], P  < 0.001), model 2 (adjusted for age and gender, HR=0.52, 95% CI [0.43, 0.64], P  < 0.001), and model 3 (adjusted for all factors, 95% CI 0.71 [0.55, 0.90], P  = 0.006). The subgroup analysis showed that the HR for the effect of IOC on survival was lower in patients with stage II (HR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.31, 0.67]) or III disease (HR=0.59, 95% CI [0.45, 0.76]), regardless of pre-operative radiotherapy (HR=0.55, 95% CI [0.45, 0.68]) or pre-operative chemotherapy (HR=0.54, 95% CI [0.44, 0.66]).

CONCLUSIONS

IOC is an independent factor that influences the survival of CRC patients. It improved the OS of patients with stages II and III CRC after radical surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR 2100043775.

Efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in preventing liver metastasis from potentially curative colorectal cancer: A systematic review network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

PURPOSE

Various chemotherapy administration methods have been used to prevent liver metastasis (LM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of these different methods in preventing LM in CRC patients who underwent curative surgery.

METHOD

A systematic search of randomized controlled trials reporting the efficacy of various adjuvant chemotherapy methods in patients with colorectal cancer who underwent curative surgery was conducted. The primary outcome was the LM rate.

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis included 19 studies reporting on 12,588 participants, comparing portal vein infusion chemotherapy (PVIC) versus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) versus systematic chemotherapy (SC) versus surgery alone. The HAIC group had the lowest LM rate when compared to the other three groups (odds ratio [OR] of PVIC vs. HAIC: 1.86; OR of SC vs. HAIC: 1.98; and HAIC vs. surgery alone: 0.43). The LM rate did not differ significantly between PVIC, SC, and surgery alone. The recurrence rates were lower for PVIC and HAIC than for surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.73 [95% CI: 0.58-0.92] and 0.45 [95% CI: 0.26-0.77]). The mortality rates of patients undergoing PVIC and HAIC were lower than that of patients undergoing surgery alone (the ORs for PVIC and HAIC were 0.77 [95% CI: 0.64-0.93] and 0.49 [95% CI: 0.24-0.98]). Anastomotic leakage, cardiopulmonary leakage, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, oral ulceration, wound infection, or ileus did not differ significantly between the four groups. PVIC showed the highest hepatic toxicity rate compared to those for SC, HAIC, and surgery alone.

CONCLUSION

HAIC might be a satisfactory method for preventing LM in patients with CRC undergoing curative surgery.

Recurrence Risk after Radical Colorectal Cancer Surgery-Less Than before, But How High Is It?

Simple Summary

Evidence indicates that recurrence risk after colon cancer today is less than it was when trials performed decades ago showed that adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the risk and prolong disease-free and overall survival. After rectal cancer surgery, local recurrence rates have decreased but it is unclear if systemic recurrences have. After a systematic review of available literature reporting recurrence risks after curative colorectal cancer surgery we report that the risks are lower today than they were in the past and that this risk reduction is not solely ascribed to the use of adjuvant therapy. Adjuvant therapy always means overtreatment of many patients, already cured by the surgery. Fewer recurrences mean that progress in the care of these patients has happened but also that the present guidelines giving recommendations based upon old data must be adjusted. The relative gains from adding chemotherapy are not altered, but the absolute number of patients gaining is less.

Abstract

Adjuvant chemotherapy aims at eradicating tumour cells sometimes present after radical surgery for a colorectal cancer (CRC) and thereby diminish the recurrence rate and prolong time to recurrence (TTR). Remaining tumour cells will lead to recurrent disease that is usually fatal. Adjuvant therapy is administered based upon the estimated recurrence risk, which in turn defines the need for this treatment. This systematic overview aims at describing whether the need has decreased since trials showing that adjuvant chemotherapy provides benefits in colon cancer were performed decades ago. Thanks to other improvements than the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, such as better staging, improved surgery, the use of radiotherapy and more careful pathology, recurrence risks have decreased. Methodological difficulties including intertrial comparisons decades apart and the present selective use of adjuvant therapy prevent an accurate estimate of the magnitude of the decreased need. Furthermore, most trials do not report recurrence rates or TTR, only disease-free and overall survival (DFS/OS). Fewer colon cancer patients, particularly in stage II but also in stage III, today display a sufficient need for adjuvant treatment considering the burden of treatment, especially when oxaliplatin is added. In rectal cancer, neo-adjuvant treatment will be increasingly used, diminishing the need for adjuvant treatment.

Integrated genomic and methylation profile analysis to identify candidate tumor marker genes in patients with colorectal cancer

Aberrant genomic expression and methylation serve important roles in cancer development. Integrated analysis of genetic and methylation profiles may identify potential tumor marker genes for colorectal cancer (CRC) prediction. In the current study, DNA methylation and mRNA expression profiles associated with CRC were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Differentially expressed mRNAs and methylated genes between tumor samples and adjacent healthy tissues were identified. Candidate tumor marker genes and prognostic clinical factors were screened according to univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. A total of 218 DEGs with aberrant methylation levels were screened from tumor samples. A risk prediction model was constructed based on identified genes and clinical factors. Randomization tests were used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model, including area under the curve (AUC) calculation and cross-validation. Cox regression analysis revealed that eight genes and six prognostic clinical factors were significantly associated with survival outcomes. Functional and pathway enrichment analysis revealed that the eight genes were mainly involved in ‘cell adhesion’, ‘fatty acid metabolism’ and ‘cytokine receptor interaction’ pathways. After combining six clinical factors with eight genes, the accuracy of risk prediction model has been increased intensively. The P-values representing the association between risk grouping and prognosis decreased from 0.009 to 0.001 and the AUC increased from 0.992 to 0.999, indicating that the comprehensive risk prediction model exhibited a good performance for disease prognosis prediction. The current study integrated genomic and methylation profiles and identified eight tumor marker genes in CRC. These candidate genes may improve the prediction accuracy of CRC prognosis.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Intraportal Chemotherapy Combined With Adjuvant Chemotherapy (mFOLFOX6) for Stage II and III Colon Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery in patients with colon cancer is not clear. We investigated the benefit of combined intraportal chemotherapy administered during radical surgery with adjuvant chemotherapy for treating stage II and III colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to OCTREE arm (intraportal chemotherapy plus mFOLFOX6) or a standard adjuvant chemotherapy arm (mFOLFOX6). The primary study endpoint was disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints included metastasis-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population comprised 237 patients. With a median follow-up of 44 months, the hazard ratio (OCTREE vs mFOLFOX6) was 0.66 (95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.90), a 34% risk reduction in favor of OCTREE (P = 0.016). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 85.2% for OCTREE and 75.6% for mFOLFOX6 alone (P = 0.030). The 3-year metastasis-free survival rates were 87.6% for OCTREE and 78.0% for mFOLFOX6 (P = 0.035). Patients had lower distant metastatic rate in the OCTREE arm (12.7% vs 22.7%; P = 0.044), when compared with the mFOLFOX6 arm. The 3-year overall survival was no significant difference between 2 arms (P = 0.178). Neutropenia occurred in 12.7% of the patients receiving OCTREE and in 2.5% of the patients receiving mFOLFOX6 (P = 0.003) within 2 weeks of surgery, and grade 3 or 4 toxicity event was no difference between 2 regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of intraoperative intraportal chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 reduced the occurrence of distant metastases and improved disease-free survival in patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer.

Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in ypT0-2N0 Patients Treated with Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy and Radical Resection for Rectal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To explore the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT) and radical resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A national consortium of 10 institutions was formed, and patients with ypT0-2N0 mid- and low-rectal cancer after PCRT and radical resection from 2004 to 2009 were included. Patients were categorized into 2 groups according to receipt of additional adjuvant chemotherapy: Adj CTx (+) versus Adj CTx (-). Propensity scores were calculated and used to perform matched and adjusted analyses comparing relapse-free survival (RFS) between treatment groups while controlling for potential confounding.

RESULTS

A total of 1016 patients, who met the selection criteria, were evaluated. Of these, 106 (10.4%) did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no overall improvement in 5-year RFS as a result of adjuvant chemotherapy [91.6% for Adj CTx (+) vs 87.5% for Adj CTx (-), P=.18]. There were no differences in 5-year local recurrence and distant metastasis rate between the 2 groups. In patients who show moderate, minimal, or no regression in tumor regression grade, however, possible association of adjuvant chemotherapy with RFS would be considered (hazard ratio 0.35; 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.88; P=.03). Cox regression analysis after propensity score matching failed to show that addition of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved RFS (hazard ratio 0.81; 95% confidence interval 0.39-1.70; P=.58).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy seemed to not influence the RFS of patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer after PCRT followed by radical resection. Thus, the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy needs to be weighed against its oncologic benefits.

Hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy for liver malignancy

To date, hepatic artery infusion (HAI) chemotherapy has primarily been investigated in the setting of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM). Few studies have been conducted in North America regarding HAI chemotherapy for primary liver cancers (PLC) or noncolorectal liver metastases (non-CRLM). Despite decades of evaluation, controversy surrounding the use of HAI chemotherapy still exists. In this article the methods of HAI chemotherapy delivery, technical aspects of catheter and pump insertion, and specific complications of HAI chemotherapy are discussed. Outcomes of clinical trials and reviews of HAI chemotherapy in the setting of CRLM, PLC, and non-CRLM are evaluated.

Advances and directions in chemotherapy using implantable port systems for colorectal cancer: a historical review

With the recent advances in chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, the prognosis for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has been significantly improved. The development of the implantable port system has also enabled patients to receive multiagent chemotherapy with a more satisfactory quality of life. Historically, chemotherapy using implantable port systems was begun to obtain an oncological benefit in the treatment of locoregional cancer. In the 1950s, there was an increasing interest in perfusion techniques for the application of chemotherapeutic agents, such as nitrogen mustard, in the locoregional treatment of metastatic cancer. Among them, the treatment of liver metastasis has interested oncologists for many years. On the other hand, implantable devices were developed during the intervening decades that have enabled patients with colorectal cancer with liver metastases to be treated effectively using hepatic arterial infusion; which became more common in the 1980s. The treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer increasingly requires a multimodal approach and multiple treatment options based not on convenience, but in terms of personalization and efficacy. Therefore, it is important to optimize the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents. Implantable port systems for colorectal cancer patients have been essential for oncological practice, and the importance of these systems will remain unchanged in the near future.

Albumin-drug conjugates in the treatment of hepatic disorders

INTRODUCTION

This review deals with the use of serum albumin (SA) as a carrier for the selective delivery of drugs to liver cells.

AREAS COVERED

The synthesis and properties of the SA conjugates prepared to enhance the performance of the drugs used in the treatment of viral hepatitis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), liver micrometastases and hepatic fibrosis are reported.

EXPERT OPINION

Studies in humans and laboratory animals demonstrated the capacity of SA conjugates to accomplish a liver targeting of the drugs, but at the same time underscored their limits and drawbacks, which can explain why to date these complexes did not reach a practical application. The major drawback is the need of administration by intravenous route, which prevents long-term daily treatments as required by some liver pathologies, such as chronic virus hepatitis and fibrosis. At present, only a conjugate carrying doxorubicin and addressed to the treatment of HCC showed in laboratory animals a solid potentiality to improve the value of the coupled drug. In the future, conjugation to SA could remain a successful strategy to permit the administration of drugs with rapid resolutive effects inside liver cells without causing severe extrahepatic adverse reactions.

Regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver

The liver is the most common site of metastatic spread of colorectal cancer (CRC). Liver may be the only site of spread in as many as 30% to 40% of patients with advanced disease and can be treated with regional therapies directed toward their liver tumors. Surgery is currently the only potentially curative treatment, with a 5-year survival rate as high as 30% to 40% in selected patients. However, fewer than 25% of cases are candidates for curative resection. A number of other locoregional therapies, such as radiofrequency or microwave ablation, cryotherapy, and chemotherapy, may be offered to patients with unresectable but isolated liver metastases. However, for most patients with metastatic spread beyond the liver, systemic chemotherapy rather than regional therapy is a more appropriate option. We review the status of various regional hepatic chemotherapies in the treatment of colorectal metastases to the liver in the light of the available, published prospective, randomized trials; this discipline has not yet been properly applied to the burgeoning use of locally ablative techniques. The regional strategies reviewed include portal venous infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), intra-arterial chemotherapy (hepatic arterial infusion [HAI]), chemoembolization, and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT).

Two-stage strategy for patients with extensive bilateral colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Two-stage hepatectomy has been proposed for patients with bilateral colorectal liver metastases. The present study assesses the feasibility and outcome of two-stage hepatectomy for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

From January 1994 to December 2008, 720 patients underwent liver resections at two institutions for colorectal liver metastases. The feasibility and outcomes of two-staged hepatectomies were evaluated.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were eligible for the two-stage approach and both stages were completed in 35 patients (78%). Reasons for failure included disease progression (n= 7), poor performance status (n= 1) and death after the first stage (n= 2). Patients who completed both stages had significantly fewer lesions than patients who failed to complete the second stage (5 vs. 8; P= 0.02). No differences between the two groups were observed with regard to lesion size, receipt of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or presence of extrahepatic disease. Post-operative morbidity (24% vs. 26%; P= 0.9) and mortality (4% vs. 5%; P= 0.8) was similar between the first and second stages. Median overall survival was 16 months. Three-year survival was significantly worse for patients failing to complete both stages (18%) compared with patients completing both stages (58%) (P < 0.001). Similar survival rates were observed between patients who completed two-stage vs. patients treated with a planned single-stage hepatectomy (58% vs. 53%; P= 0.34).

CONCLUSION

The two-stage strategy for colorectal liver metastases can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality. The second stage will not be feasible in 20-25% of patients. Patients who are able to complete the two-stage approach, however, may have long-term survival comparable to patients treated with a planned single-stage hepatectomy.

Lactosaminated human albumin, a hepatotropic carrier of drugs

A selective delivery of drugs to liver can be obtained by conjugation with galactosyl terminating macromolecules. The conjugates selectively enter hepatocytes after interaction of the carrier galactose residues with the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGP-R) present only on these cells. Within hepatocytes the conjugates are transported to lysosomes where the drug is set free from the carrier, becoming concentrated in liver cells. The present article reviews the liver targeting of drugs obtained with lactosaminated albumin (L-SA), a neoglycoprotein exposing galactosyl residues. We report: (1) experiments which demonstrate the antiviral efficacy of the L-H(human)SA-ara-AMP conjugate in laboratory animals and in humans with viral hepatitis; (2) the property of a L-HSA conjugate with fluorodeoxyuridine to produce concentrations of the drug higher in hepatic sinusoids than in systemic circulation, with the potential of accomplishing a loco-regional, noninvasive treatment of liver micrometastases; (3) the increased anticancer activity of doxorubicin (DOXO) when coupled to L-HSA on all the forms of chemically induced rat hepatocellular carcinomas including those which do not express the ASGP-R.

Does adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy provide a benefit for patients with resected rectal cancer who have already received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy? A systematic review of randomised trials

BACKGROUND

The results of the recently published large European randomised study in rectal cancer (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 22921 trial) do not support current guidelines recommending postoperative chemotherapy for patients who have previously undergone preoperative radiochemotherapy or radiotherapy [radio(chemo)therapy]. To evaluate this discrepancy further, a systematic review of relevant randomised trials was undertaken.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in order to identify randomised studies exploring adjuvant chemotherapy against observation in patients with rectal cancer previously treated with preoperative radio(chemo)therapy.

RESULTS

A statistically significant benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was not found in any of the four relevant randomised trials. Non-protocolised subgroup analysis of one study indicated a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy for high rectal tumours and for patients downstaged to ypT0-2N0 but no effect for low-lying rectal tumours. However, the body of evidence indicates that patients downstaged after radio(chemo)therapy to ypT0-2N0 disease are not candidates for testing adjuvant chemotherapy in future trials due to the considerable over-treatment anticipated by this manoeuvre.

CONCLUSIONS

To resolve the issue in question, a meta-analysis of relevant studies is required, and new trials should be launched to explore new drug combinations against observation. Currently, delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is not evidence based.

Adjuvant perioperative portal vein or peripheral intravenous chemotherapy for potentially curative colorectal cancer: long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The perioperative use of a single course adjuvant portal vein infusion chemotherapy in patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer has been shown to significantly improve overall survival but did not reduce the occurrence of liver metastases (SAKK 40/81) [Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Lancet 345(8946):349-353, 1995]. The objective of the present prospective, three-arm randomized multicenter trial was to assess whether peripheral venous administration of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen based on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin C decreases the occurrence of liver metastases as well as prolongs disease-free and overall survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stages I-III colorectal cancer patients (n = 753) were randomized to receive either surgery alone (control arm), surgery plus postoperative portal venous infusion of 5-FU 500 mg/m(2) plus heparin given for 24 hours for seven consecutive days plus mitomycin C 10 mg/m(2) given on the first day (arm 2), or surgery and the same chemotherapy regimen administered by peripheral venous route (arm 3).

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-free survival for the three treatment groups were 65% (control group), 60% (portal vein infusion, hazard ratio 1.18, p = 0.23), and 64% (intravenous infusion, hazard ratio 1.04, p = 0.76); the 5-year overall survival was 72% (control group), 69% (portal vein infusion, hazard ratio 1.21, p = 0.2), and 74% (intravenous infusion, hazard ratio 1.03, p = 0.86), respectively. A significant accumulation of early deaths were observed in the portal vein infusion group (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

The present prospective randomized multicenter trial provides compelling evidence that short-term perioperative chemotherapy does not improve disease-free and overall survival in patients with potentially curative colorectal cancer. In contrary, the chemotherapy regimen administered in the present investigation seems to have potentially harmful effects, a finding which should be carefully considered in the planning of future trials. Postoperative short-term administration of 5-FU plus mitomycin C either through portal infusion or a central venous catheter is not recommended for routine use in patients with potentially curable colorectal cancer.

Adjuvant therapy for completely resected stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery. Although adjuvant chemotherapy benefits patients with stage III disease, there is uncertainty of such benefit in stage II colon cancer. A systematic review of the literature was performed to better define the potential benefits of adjuvant therapy for patients with stage II colon cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of adjuvant therapy on overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Ovid MEDLINE (1986-2007), EMBASE (1980-2007), and EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( to 2007) were searched using the medical headings "colonic neoplasms", "colorectal neoplasms", "adjuvant chemotherapy", "adjuvant radiotherapy" and "immunotherapy", and the text words "colon cancer" and "colonic neoplasms". In addition, proceedings from the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the European Society of Medical Oncology (1996 to 2004) as well as personal files were searched for additional information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized trials or meta-analyses containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant therapy versus surgery alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

:Three reviewers summarized the results of selected studies. The main outcomes of interest were overall and disease-free survival, however, data on toxicity and treatment delivery were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS

With regards to the effect of adjuvant therapy on stage II colon cancer, the pooled relative risk ratio for overall survival was 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.88, 1.05). With regards to disease-free survival, the pooled relative risk ratio was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.75, 0.92).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no improvement in overall survival in the pooled analysis, we did find that disease-free survival in patients with stage II colon cancer was significantly better with the use of adjuvant therapy. It seems reasonable to discuss the benefits of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy with those stage II patients who have high risk features, including obstruction, perforation, inadequate lymph node sampling or T4 disease. The co-morbidities and likelihood of tolerating adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should be considered as well. There exists a need to further define which high-risk features in stage II colon cancer patients should be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy. Also, researchers must continue to search for other therapies which might be more effective, shorter in duration and less toxic than those available today.

Endpoints in Adjuvant Treatment Trials: A Systematic Review of the Literature in Colon Cancer and Proposed Definitions for Future Trials

Disease-free survival is increasingly being used as the primary endpoint of most trials testing adjuvant treatments in cancer. Other frequently used endpoints include overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and time to recurrence. These endpoints are often defined differently in different trials in the same type of cancer, leading to a lack of comparability among trials. In this Commentary, we used adjuvant studies in colon cancer as a model to address this issue. In a systematic review of the literature, we identified 52 studies of adjuvant treatment in colon cancer published in 1997-2006 that used eight other endpoints in addition to overall survival. Both the definition of these endpoints and the starting point for measuring time to the events that constituted these endpoints varied widely. A panel of experts on clinical research on colorectal cancer then reached consensus on the definition of each endpoint. Disease-free survival--defined as the time from randomization to any event, irrespective of cause--was considered to be the most informative endpoint for assessing the effect of treatment and therefore the most relevant to clinical practice. The proposed guidelines may add to the quality and cross-comparability of future studies of adjuvant treatments for cancer.

Can biliary carcinoembryonic antigen identify colorectal cancer patients with occult hepatic metastases?

BACKGROUND

Twenty-five percent of radically treated colorectal cancer patients already have occult hepatic metastases (OHM) that will later be observed during postoperative follow-up. Instrumental examinations, i.e., intraoperative ultrasound or Doppler perfusion index, have not improved diagnosis. As carcinoembyonic antigen (CEA) levels are useful to reveal hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, determination of CEA in the bile rather than the blood may allow preclinical diagnosis of OHM thanks to the reduced volume of bile.

METHODS

One hundred radically treated colorectal cancer patients were enrolled in the study. Bile was withdrawn from the gallbladder intraoperatively and biliary CEA levels determined using an immuno-enzymatic method (normal value 0-5 ng/ml). Eighty-nine fully evaluable patients were followed up for three years postoperatively to monitor hepatic metastases. Preoperative blood CEA, lymph node metastases and biliary CEA were compared in order to assess which procedure was more efficient in identifying patients who would develop hepatic metastases.

RESULTS

Eleven of the 89 evaluable patients developed hepatic metastases: 9/11 presented elevated biliary CEA levels (mean: 12.73; range: 5.1-26.2); 8/11 had high preoperative blood CEA values; and 9/11 were at anatomopathological stage N+. In the 78 patients who did not develop hepatic metastases, biliary CEA was within normal limits in 73/78, preoperative blood CEA was normal in 60/78, and 58/78 patients were at anatomopathological stage N-. Hence, the sensitivity of biliary CEA was 81.8%, specificity was 93.6%, and diagnostic accuracy was 92.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Determination of biliary CEA seems to be more efficient in identifying patients presenting OHM who require frequent clinical examinations or adjuvant cancer treatment.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer--an overview of current management for surgeons

BACKGROUND

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer has been re-evaluated with the advent of newer agents. The results of published trials are reviewed in this article and the protocols of some of the major ongoing trials outlined.

METHODS

A medline based literature search was performed for articles relating to clinical trials using systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer in the advanced and adjuvant setting. Additional original papers were obtained from citations in those identified by the initial search.

RESULTS

The combination of irinotecan or oxaliplatin with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemotherapy regimens for advanced cancer demonstrates better response rates when compared with 5-FU and folinic acid (FA). Although this translates into a modest survival benefit, it may increase resectability rates in patients with hepatic metastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III cancer has been established to improve long-term survival although it is benefit for patients with stage II disease remains less clear.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of the various combinations of chemotherapeutic agents that are most effective and the clinical situations for which they are best suited is ongoing and will improve the current outlook for those with colorectal cancer.

Colon cancer

Colon cancer is one of the leading tumours in the world and is considered among the big killers, together with lung, prostate and breast cancer. In the recent years very important advances occurred in the field of treatment of this frequent disease: adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated to be effective, chiefly in stage III patients, and surgery was optimized in order to achieve the best results with a low morbidity. Several new target-oriented drugs are under evaluation and some of them (cetuximab and bevacizumab) have already exhibited a good activity/efficacy, mainly in combination with chemotherapy. The development of updated recommendations for the best management of these patients is crucial in order to obtain the best results, not only in clinical research but also in everyday practice. This report summarizes the most important achievements in this field and provides the readers useful suggestions for their professional practice.

Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer: a systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in evidence-based care's gastrointestinal cancer disease site group

PURPOSE

To develop a systematic review that would address the following question: Should patients with stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy?

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to locate randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant therapy to observation.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven trials and 11 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for stage II colon cancer comes primarily from a trial of fluorouracil plus levamisole and a meta-analysis of 1,016 patients comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus observation. Neither detected an improvement in disease-free or overall survival for adjuvant therapy. A recent pooled analysis of data from seven trials observed a benefit for adjuvant therapy in a multivariate analysis for both disease-free and overall survival. The disease-free survival benefits appeared to extend to stage II patients; however, no P values were provided. A meta-analysis of chemotherapy by portal vein infusion has also shown a benefit in disease-free and overall survival for stage II patients. A meta-analysis was conducted using data on stage II patients where data were available (n = 4,187). The mortality risk ratio was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P =.07).

CONCLUSION

There is preliminary evidence indicating that adjuvant therapy is associated with a disease-free survival benefit for patients with stage II colon cancer. These benefits are small and not necessarily associated with improved overall survival. Patients should be made aware of these results and encouraged to participate in active clinical trials. Additional investigation of newer therapies and more mature data from the presently available trials should be pursued.

Randomized Trial of Intraportal and/or Systemic Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Colon Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection of colon cancer is standard treatment. However, the choice of best delivery route--that is, systemic (i.e., intravenous or oral) or regional (i.e., intraportal, intraperitoneal, or hepatic arterial infusion)--has been controversial. In a randomized clinical trial of patients with colon cancer, we compared the benefits of chemotherapy delivered by these routes individually or in combination.

METHODS

From April 2, 1992, through April 30, 1998, 1084 eligible patients with Dukes' stage B or C colon carcinoma were randomly assigned: 369 patients to the IP regimen (continuous portal vein infusion of 5-fluorouracil at 500 mg/m2 of body surface daily and heparin at 5000 IU daily for 7 consecutive days, beginning on the day of surgery), 358 patients to the SY regimen (six 28-day courses of systemic leucovorin at 100 mg/m2 daily on days 1 through 5 followed by systemic bolus 5-fluorouracil at 370 mg/m2 daily on days 1 through 5, with treatment initiated 15-35 days after surgery), and 357 patients to the IP+SY regimen (the IP regimen followed by the SY regimen, with the same scheduling). Primary survival was analyzed with the log-rank statistic and a Cox multivariable regression model. All statistical tests were two sided.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 99 months, 389 events (recurrences, second malignancies, or deaths) had occurred, and 361 patients died. Sites of first recurrences were similar among the three arms. At 5 years, overall and event-free survival rates were similar among those on the IP (74% and 68%, respectively), SY (78% and 71%), and IP+SY (73% and 67%) regimens. When compared with the group on the SY regimen, the risk for death associated with the IP regimen (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82 to 1.36) was similar to that associated with the IP+SY regimen (HR = 1.12, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.45) (P =.69), as were the risks for first event (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.84 to 1.37 and HR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.41, respectively) (P=.74).

CONCLUSION

Overall and event-free survival rates were similar in all three arms. The combined regimen was no better than either single regimen alone.

Regional chemotherapeutic techniques for liver tumors: current knowledge and future directions

After a rather long period of stagnation, intra-arterial therapeutic approaches for treating liver tumors are currently progressing rapidly. These new modalities will increase the resectability of initially unresectable liver tumors after dramatic responses. At the same time, resectability rates are increasing with the assistance of local ablative physical treatments such as radiofrequency, resulting in an improvement of patients' median survival rates and quality of life.

Randomized clinical trial of adjuvant radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil infusion in colorectal cancer (AXIS)

Background

Postoperative portal vein infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a well tolerated and widely applicable treatment for colorectal cancer that might have an enormous public health impact, even if it produced survival benefits of just a few per cent. Very large trials are required to detect such differences, and the Adjuvant X-ray and 5-FU Infusion Study (AXIS) is the largest such trial yet reported.

Methods

Consenting patients with presumed colorectal cancer were randomized to surgery with or without 7 days of PVI (1 g 5-FU plus 5000 units heparin in 1 litre 5 per cent dextrose infused over each 24-h period). In addition, patients with rectal cancer could be randomized to radiotherapy or no radiotherapy to be given either before or after surgery.

Results

Between November 1989 and December 1997, 3583 patients were randomized with respect to PVI. The survival hazard ratios (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.)) in all patients randomized and in the curatively resected subgroup (71·2 per cent of patients) were 1·00 (0·92 to 1·11) and 0·94 (0·83 to 1·06) respectively. Tests for heterogeneity suggested a greater treatment benefit for patients with colonic cancer than for patients with rectal cancer with respect to disease-free survival (hazard ratio 0·79 versus 1·03; P = 0·07), and there was a non-significant trend with respect to overall survival (hazard ratio 0·87 versus 1·03; P = 0·17). No survival benefit was seen in the 761 patients randomized with respect to radiotherapy; although not statistically significant, the impact on local recurrence rates was similar to that reported in the literature.

Conclusion

No overall benefit of PVI was established in AXIS when colonic and rectal cancers were considered together, but the evidence suggesting a differential treatment effect according to site of cancer in AXIS was strongly supported by a meta-analysis incorporating the previous trials. Combining the data gave hazard ratios of 0·82 and 1·00 for colonic and rectal tumours respectively (test for interaction, P = 0·024), equating to an absolute survival benefit for patients with colonic cancer of 5·8 (95 per cent c.i. 2·8 to 8·5) per cent, a level close to that seen for prolonged systemic therapy.

Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with approximately 300,000 new cases and 200,000 related deaths in Europe and the USA each year. Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer is now widely accepted and can reduce mortality with approximately 10%. This can be considered as one of the major achievements in oncology from the past decade. Current results will be discussed and strategies for the future will be outlined, including on-going or planned large-scale trials with new drugs and approaches.

The role of chemotherapy in the management of resectable colorectal cancer

Adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as the standard of care for patients with node-positive resected colon cancer. 5-fluorouracil modulated with leucovorin given for six months is currently the most widely accepted "standard" regimen. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II remain investigational and some prognostic indicators that correlate with higher risk for subsequent recurrence may be used for these patients when consider adjuvant chemotherapy. Other investigational approaches include regional portal vein infusion and intraperitoneal therapy, immunotherapy, and new drugs, with proven activity in metastatic disease. Patients older than 70 years are also candidate for adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy of rectal cancer is often associated with radiotherapy and enhances local control seen with radiotherapy and improves survival of these patients.

Management of colorectal liver metastases

Hepatic metastases occur in 60% of patients following resection for colorectal cancer. Liver resection is the only curative option, with one third of resected patients alive at five years. In those developing recurrence in the liver following resection, further liver surgery may be curative, with similar 5 years survival rates of about 30%. Until recently surgery was feasible in only 15-25% of patients with colorectal liver metastases. New strategies, such as downstaging chemotherapy, portal vein embolization and two-stage hepatectomy, may increase the resectability rate by 15%. Earlier detection of liver metastases would increase resectability, although good follow-up trials are lacking. Once suspected, colorectal liver metastases are staged by spiral CT, CT portography and MRI, which have similar overall accuracies. Mortality following liver resection is less than 5% in major centres, with a morbidity rate of 20% to 50%. Prognostic scoring systems can be used to predict the likely cure rate with resection. Pulmonary metastases occur in 10-25% of patients with resected colorectal cancer, but are limited to the lung in only 2% of cases. In these selected cases surgery provides long-term survival in 20-40%, and repeat lung resection has shown similar rates. For patients with unresectable disease, chemotherapy and ablation techniques have been demonstrated to prolong survival, although chemotherapy alone has been shown to improve quality of life.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in Western countries. If surgery remains the only cure, recurrence rates for colon cancer range from 30% to 60% for stage III tumors. Adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for stage III colon tumors and consists of monthly administration of bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for 5 consecutive days a month over a 6-month period (Mayo regimen). Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer remains controversial, and its administration is not routinely recommended except in certain high-risk and selected patients. Immunotherapy, new drug-based therapies or combinations, and cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors are being tested in the adjuvant setting. Total mesorectum excision is now the gold standard surgical technique for rectal cancer resection, and this procedure has dramatically decreased local recurrence. Nevertheless, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is commonly indicated in the United States. In Europe, neoadjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for stage II and III resectable rectal cancers; the role of chemotherapy remains mostly investigational.

Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer (current expert opinion derived from the Third International Conference: Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer, Dublin, 2001)

This article summarises the progress that has been made in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer over the last decade. In view of the consequent improvements in recurrence rates and in overall survival, the development of effective adjuvant treatments for colorectal cancer is considered as one of the most important to be made in clinical oncology over the last decade. Treatment recommendations based on evidence-based data and on expert opinions are summarised in this manuscript. However, a consensus cannot be reached on all aspects of treatment because of data that is currently emerging that will influence clinical practice and because of the many ongoing clinical trials. Those involved in the treatment of colorectal cancer should therefore be encouraged to continue to provide optimal patient care and to participate in well designed clinical trials in order to increase the evidence upon which they can base their clinical judgements and in order to make further progress.

Floxuridine coupling with lactosaminated human albumin to increase drug efficacy on liver micrometastases

BACKGROUND

Conjugates of nucleoside analogues with galactosyl terminating peptides selectively enter hepatocytes through the asialoglycoprotein receptor. After intracellular release from the carrier, the drugs partly exit from hepatic cells into hepatic blood.

AIMS

To establish whether administration of a conjugate of floxuridine with lactosaminated human albumin selectively enhances drug concentrations in hepatic blood. Floxuridine is a fluoropyrimidine active on human colorectal cancer, a tumour which metastasises first to the liver.

METHODS

In rats injected with free or conjugated floxuridine, plasma levels of the drug were determined in hepatic veins and in inferior vena cava, in order to measure drug concentrations in hepatic blood and in the systemic circulation, respectively.

RESULTS

Ratios between floxuridine levels in hepatic veins and those in systemic circulation were found to be seven times higher in rats injected with the conjugate (p=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that coupling to lactosaminated albumin might improve the effect of floxuridine in adjuvant chemotherapy of colorectal cancer by exposing the cells of liver micrometastases (nourished by hepatic sinusoids) to enhanced drug concentrations.

Resection and local therapy for liver metastases

In 30-50% of patients the liver is a preferred site of distant disease for many malignant tumours. Due to the high incidence, most of the available data relate to metastases arising from colorectal primaries. Surgical resection is at present the only treatment offering potential cure. The achievable 5-year survival rate is 30%. However, only 10-15% of patients with colorectal liver metastases can undergo potentially curative liver resection. Therefore, accurate staging is an important prerequisite in selecting patients who would benefit from surgery. Recurrence of hepatic metastases after potentially curative resection occurs in up to 60% of the cases. Results demonstrate that re-resection of liver metastases can provide long-term survival rates in a carefully selected group of patients without extrahepatic disease. Because of the high rate of recurrences following an apparently curative resection several authors investigated the use of adjuvant chemotherapy (systemic, intraportal, and hepatic arterial infusion). Until recently none had shown effectiveness. Pre-operative chemotherapy seems to be a promising approach in patients with liver metastases initially considered unsuitable for radical surgery. Recently, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been proposed as an alternative approach to conventional surgery as initial management with the aim of improving the results in resectable liver metastases. Interventional strategies (ethanol injection, cryosurgery, laser-induced thermotherapy, radio-frequency ablation) and combined modalities (surgical/interventional) are additive methods which may help to improve treatment results in the future.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequent cancers in the world, especially in occidental countries. The primary curative therapy is surgical resection of the tumour. Within the last 15 years, appropriately powered prospective randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant post-operative chemotherapy should be the standard treatment for stage III cancers (node-positive disease). 5-Fluorouracil(5FU)/levamisole was used in the early 1990s but has now been replaced by 5FU/leucovorin. The recommended duration of treatment is 6 months. Combining levamisole with 5FU/leucovorin does not improve efficacy. In patients with stage II colon cancer it is still unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy is effective. In an attempt to define groups of stage II cases that may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, considerable efforts have been made to determine molecular genetic factors (tumour-ploidy and mutations or alterations in oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes). Regional therapy (particularly portal vein infusion) is one of the other therapeutic strategies still considered to be investigational. Current clinical trials are evaluating the role of non-fluorinated pyrimidine agents in an adjuvant setting.

The EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group: 40 years of research contributing to improved GI cancer management

The Gastrointestinal (GI) Tract Cancer Group's aims are to develop protocols concerning the different aspects of gastrointestinal tract malignancies, diagnosis, biology and mainly treatment. Prior to approval, new project proposals are discussed within different committees of the group and in the presence of specialists concerned, according to the type of trial. There are three main committees in the GI Group, chemotherapy, surgery and research. All projects of GI tract cancer are discussed first in the relevant committee before being discussed in the multidisciplinary plenary scientific session of the Group meeting. Multidisciplinarity has always been one of the major principles of the Group. This is well illustrated by the fact that the Chairman of the Group has been alternately a medical oncologist and a surgeon and is presently a surgeon. Radiation therapists also participate in the activity of the group. Like other EORTC groups, the GI Group has developed high standards of quality. Officers and members work in close co-operation with the staff of the Data Center in Brussels and in particular medical advisors, statisticians and data managers. Members from 32 different countries participate in the activities of the Group, mostly from European countries, but also from Russia, Egypt, Hong Kong, Israel, Peru, Russia, South Africa and many others through intergroup activities such as Australia, Canada and the USA.

Adjuvant therapy of colon cancer: a review

Colon cancer is a common cause of cancer-related mortality. Complete surgical resection of the primary tumor and/or select metastatic lesions can be curative in many patients. The risk of recurrence after resection can be predicted by pathologic staging. Large prospective randomized trials over the past 2 decades have clearly shown an increased overall survival for patients with resected stage III colon cancer who are treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II disease remains controversial. There is indirect evidence to support adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of metastatic disease. Locoregional approaches such as radiation, hepatic arterial infusion, or portal vein chemotherapy remain investigational. Adjuvant immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies is emerging as a therapeutic option that might complement chemotherapy. Future challenges include improving adjuvant chemotherapy with the addition and/or substitution of new agents, resolving which subset of patients with stage II and resected stage IV colon cancer might benefit from therapy, validating the benefit of immunotherapy, and investigating locoregional therapies compared with systemic therapy.

Review article: non-systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer-portal vein, hepatic arterial and intraperitoneal approaches

Loco-regional chemotherapy, an alternative to systemic chemotherapy in the management of colorectal cancer, has been evaluated in both adjuvant and palliative settings. The rationale for loco-regional delivery is to achieve higher dose concentrations of drugs at the tumour site or at the most common sites of tumour recurrence, while limiting systemic exposure and associated toxicity. Adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy and palliative hepa-tic arterial chemotherapy have been most extensively investigated. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has also been studied as an adjuvant treatment after complete resection of colorectal cancer or cytoreductive surgery in patients with established peritoneal carcinomatosis. The results obtained have been disappointing, and none of these procedures can be considered as a standard therapeutic option today. However, methodological difficulties were encountered in most published studies, and the investigated schedules and doses may not have been optimal. New combinations of cytotoxic drugs and new indications are currently under consideration. Promising results have recently been published for adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy and hepatic arterial chemotherapy following surgical resection of hepatic metastases, but additional well-designed multicentre phase III trials are needed to determine the true benefits of these treatment modalities and to address the issues of cost and quality of life.

Coupling of 5-fluoro 2'-deoxyuridine to lactosaminated poly-l-lysine: an approach to a regional, non-invasive chemotherapy of liver micrometastases

Nucleoside analogs conjugated with galactosyl-terminating peptides selectively enter liver cells and after intracellular release from the carrier partly exit into bloodstream, resulting in higher concentrations in liver blood than in systemic circulation. The aim of the present experiments was to ascertain whether, in mice injected with non-toxic doses of a 5-fluoro 2'-deoxyuridine (FUdR) conjugate with lactosaminated poly-L-lysine (L-poly(LYS)), the drug was released by hepatic cells in high enough amounts to be pharmacologically active on neoplastic cells infiltrating the liver. We observed that L-poly(LYS)-FUdR inhibited the growth of hepatic metastases induced by intrasplenic administration of murine colon carcinoma C-26 cells. L-poly(LYS)-FUdR was not toxic for C-26 cells in vitro, was selectively taken up by mouse liver, and was stable in mouse blood, indicating that the effect on the metastases was due to FUdR (and/or its active metabolites) released in liver blood after the conjugate was taken up by the hepatic cells. These results suggest that L-poly(LYS)-FUdR might be useful in adjuvant chemotherapy of tumors giving liver metastases. The drug released from hepatic cells into liver blood following conjugate administration via the peripheral venous route might accomplish a locoregional, non-invasive treatment of micrometastases nourished by liver sinusoids.

Adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer at the turn of the century: European and US perspectives

BACKGROUND

Despite early scepticism, several studies of systemic adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy demonstrated significant benefits in high-risk colon cancer. As many clinical investigations have since been conducted in this setting, a comprehensive literature review was undertaken to clarify the role of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of colorectal cancer.

DESIGN

Current and future adjuvant treatment approaches in colorectal cancer were reviewed, and differences in the present-day North American and European practices were highlighted.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

5-FU plus leucovorin for six months is generally considered the 'standard' adjuvant treatment in Dukes' stage C (stage II) colon cancer. Large-scale international trials of other strategies are required to provide further advances in treatment outcome. Following the lead of the USA Intergroup trials, a recently initiated cooperative effort, the Pan-European Trials in Adjuvant Colon Cancer (PETACC), may serve as a European model for such investigations. In T3 and/or lymph-node positive rectal cancer, postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy in the USA is considered the adjuvant treatment of choice. However, most European investigators have advocated for preoperative intensive short-course irradiation instead. Randomized trials in this area are ongoing. In the near future, new drugs for the treatment of colorectal cancer may lead to tailored therapies.

Adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy for Dukes B2 and C colorectal cancer also receiving systemic treatment: results of a multicenter randomized trial. Groupe Régional d'Etude du Cancer Colo-Rectal (Belgium)

In a randomized trial, the authors evaluated the possible adjuvant activity of intraportal chemotherapy (with 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2/day in continuous infusion for 7 days and mitomycin C 10 mg/m2 at day 7) administered after surgery to half of the patients who underwent a full resection for Dukes B2 or C colorectal cancer. The procedure appeared manageable and safe. Two hundred and sixty patients were initially randomized, among whom 173 were finally considered as fully evaluable after having completed six courses of systemic chemotherapy. The reasons for withdrawal were basically tumoral ones and patients or doctors compliance. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, no difference could be observed in the patients evolution assessed as relapses or deaths rate, or as relapse-free (at 5 years: 68% in the portal treatment group versus 70% in the control group) or overall survival (at 5 years: 76 versus 74%). The frequency of hepatic metastases (21 versus 18%) was also similar in both groups.

Adjuvant intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil in high-risk colon cancer: A multicenter phase III trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results of a prospective multicenter randomized study of adjuvant intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered during 6 days shortly after resection of stages II and III colon cancers.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Systemic adjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival of patients with stage III colon cancer receiving treatment for 6 months. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy theoretically combines peritoneal and hepatic effects.

METHODS

After resection, 267 patients were randomized into two groups. Patients in group 1 (n = 133) underwent resection followed by intraperitoneal administration of 5-FU (0.6 g/m2/day) for 6 days (day 4 to day 10). These patients also received intravenous 5-FU (1 g) during surgery. Patients in group 2 underwent resection alone (n = 134).

RESULTS

In group 1, 103 patients received the total dose, 18 received a partial dose as a result of technical or tolerance problems, and 12 did not receive the chemotherapy. Rates of surgical death and complications were similar in both groups. Tolerance to treatment was excellent or fair in 97% of the patients and poor in 3%. After a median follow-up of 58 months, 5-year overall survival rates were 74% in group 1 and 69% in group 2; disease-free survival rates were 68% and 62%, respectively. Survival curves were superimposed until 3 years after treatment and began diverging thereafter. Among patients receiving the full treatment, the 5-year disease-free survival rate was improved in the treatment group in patients with stage II cancers but was unchanged in patients with stage III cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy with intraperitoneal 5-FU administered during a short period after surgery was well tolerated but was not sufficient to reduce the risk of death significantly. However, it reduced the risk of recurrence in stage II cancers. These results suggest that it should be associated with systemic chemotherapy to reduce both local and distant recurrences.

Enhanced liver blood concentrations of adenine arabinoside accomplished by lactosaminated poly-L-lysine coupling: implications for regional chemotherapy of hepatic micrometastases

Conjugates of antiviral and antiblastic nucleoside analogs (NAs) with galactosyl-terminating peptides selectively enter hepatocytes after binding of the carrier galactose residues to the asialoglycoprotein receptor. Since NAs, when set free from the carrier within hepatocytes, partly exit from these cells into the bloodstream, we considered the possibility that administration of galactosyl-terminating conjugates of NAs could result in plasma concentrations of these drugs that would be higher in liver sinusoids than in capillaries of other organs. In the present study we demonstrated the validity of this hypothesis. We injected rats with a conjugate of adenine arabinoside (ara-A) with lactosaminated poly-L-lysine and found that the plasma concentrations of ara-A were >2-fold higher in blood of liver than in systemic circulation. Liver blood was collected from the inferior vena cava after closing below and above the outflows of the hepatic veins. The present result suggests that conjugation with galactosyl-terminating peptides might be a way to selectively increase the concentrations of NAs not only in hepatocytes, which have the asialoglycoprotein receptor, but also in cells infiltrating the liver, such as neoplastic cells of micrometastases nourished by hepatic sinusoids.

Developments in fluoropyrimidine therapy for gastrointestinal cancer

The combination of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin is the standard treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer and in Dukes' C colon cancer. There is, however, no agreement on the method for administration in metastatic colorectal cancer. Several new studies published in 1998 suggest that infusional 5-fluorouracil gives a higher response rate and better toxicity profile compared with a standard bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin regimen. The median survival rate, however, is not different. Several new active drugs are being developed for advanced colorectal cancer. It has not yet been shown that these drugs as single agents are superior to an optimal 5-fluorouracil regimen. Combination trials of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin, CPT-11 and raltitrexed are ongoing, and it can be expected that several of these combinations will be more active than 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. The challenge for the future will be to show the most active combination and the best sequence of these combinations. The development of the orally administered fluoropyrimidines was rapid in 1998. Randomized studies comparing UFT, capecitabine, and eniluracil plus 5-fluorouracil with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin are ongoing.