1
|
Yang L, Yang J, Kleppe A, Danielsen HE, Kerr DJ. Personalizing adjuvant therapy for patients with colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:67-79. [PMID: 38001356 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00834-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
The current standard-of-care adjuvant treatment for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) comprises a fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) as a single agent or in combination with oxaliplatin, for either 3 or 6 months. Selection of therapy depends on conventional histopathological staging procedures, which constitute a blunt tool for patient stratification. Given the relatively marginal survival benefits that patients can derive from adjuvant treatment, improving the safety of chemotherapy regimens and identifying patients most likely to benefit from them is an area of unmet need. Patient stratification should enable distinguishing those at low risk of recurrence and a high chance of cure by surgery from those at higher risk of recurrence who would derive greater absolute benefits from chemotherapy. To this end, genetic analyses have led to the discovery of germline determinants of toxicity from fluoropyrimidines, the identification of patients at high risk of life-threatening toxicity, and enabling dose modulation to improve safety. Thus far, results from analyses of resected tissue to identify mutational or transcriptomic signatures with value as prognostic biomarkers have been rather disappointing. In the past few years, the application of artificial intelligence-driven models to digital images of resected tissue has identified potentially useful algorithms that stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups. Similarly, liquid biopsy approaches involving measurements of circulating tumour DNA after surgery are additionally useful tools to identify patients at high and low risk of tumour recurrence. In this Perspective, we provide an overview of the current landscape of adjuvant therapy for patients with CRC and discuss how new technologies will enable better personalization of therapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jinlin Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Research-based Innovation Visual Intelligence, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Frei AL, McGuigan A, Sinha RRAK, Glaire MA, Jabbar F, Gneo L, Tomasevic T, Harkin A, Iveson TJ, Saunders M, Oein K, Maka N, Pezella F, Campo L, Hay J, Edwards J, Sansom OJ, Kelly C, Tomlinson I, Kildal W, Kerr RS, Kerr DJ, Danielsen HE, Domingo E, Church DN, Koelzer VH. Accounting for intensity variation in image analysis of large-scale multiplexed clinical trial datasets. J Pathol Clin Res 2023; 9:449-463. [PMID: 37697694 PMCID: PMC10556275 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) imaging can provide comprehensive quantitative and spatial information for multiple immune markers for tumour immunoprofiling. However, application at scale to clinical trial samples sourced from multiple institutions is challenging due to pre-analytical heterogeneity. This study reports an analytical approach to the largest multi-parameter immunoprofiling study of clinical trial samples to date. We analysed 12,592 tissue microarray (TMA) spots from 3,545 colorectal cancers sourced from more than 240 institutions in two clinical trials (QUASAR 2 and SCOT) stained for CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FoxP3, pan-cytokeratin, and DAPI by mIF. TMA slides were multi-spectrally imaged and analysed by cell-based and pixel-based marker analysis. We developed an adaptive thresholding method to account for inter- and intra-slide intensity variation in TMA analysis. Applying this method effectively ameliorated inter- and intra-slide intensity variation improving the image analysis results compared with methods using a single global threshold. Correlation of CD8 data derived by our mIF analysis approach with single-plex chromogenic immunohistochemistry CD8 data derived from subsequent sections indicates the validity of our method (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ρ between 0.63 and 0.66, p ≪ 0.01) as compared with the current gold standard analysis approach. Evaluation of correlation between cell-based and pixel-based analysis results confirms equivalency (ρ > 0.8, p ≪ 0.01, except for CD20 in the epithelial region) of both analytical approaches. These data suggest that our adaptive thresholding approach can enable analysis of mIF-stained clinical trial TMA datasets by digital pathology at scale for precision immunoprofiling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja L Frei
- Department of Pathology and Molecular PathologyUniversity Hospital Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Life Science Zurich Graduate School, PhD Program in BiomedicineUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
| | | | | | - Mark A Glaire
- Nuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Faiz Jabbar
- Nuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Luciana Gneo
- Nuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - Andrea Harkin
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials UnitUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Tim J Iveson
- Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
| | | | - Karin Oein
- Glasgow Tissue Research FacilityUniversity of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
| | - Noori Maka
- Glasgow Tissue Research FacilityUniversity of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
| | - Francesco Pezella
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - Jennifer Hay
- Glasgow Tissue Research FacilityUniversity of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
| | | | - Owen J Sansom
- School of Cancer SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
- Cancer Research UK Beatson InstituteGlasgowUK
- Cancer Research UK Scotland CentreEdinburgh and GlasgowUK
| | - Caroline Kelly
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials UnitUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | | | - Wanja Kildal
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and InformaticsOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | | | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and InformaticsOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
- Department of InformaticsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Enric Domingo
- Department of OncologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Cancer Research UK Scotland CentreEdinburgh and GlasgowUK
| | | | - David N Church
- Nuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research CentreOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular PathologyUniversity Hospital Zurich, University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland
- Nuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of OncologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wiley MB, Bauer J, Mehrotra K, Zessner-Spitzenberg J, Kolics Z, Cheng W, Castellanos K, Nash MG, Gui X, Kone L, Maker AV, Qiao G, Reddi D, Church DN, Kerr RS, Kerr DJ, Grippo PJ, Jung B. Non-Canonical Activin A Signaling Stimulates Context-Dependent and Cellular-Specific Outcomes in CRC to Promote Tumor Cell Migration and Immune Tolerance. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3003. [PMID: 37296966 PMCID: PMC10252122 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15113003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 05/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
We have shown that activin A (activin), a TGF-β superfamily member, has pro-metastatic effects in colorectal cancer (CRC). In lung cancer, activin activates pro-metastatic pathways to enhance tumor cell survival and migration while augmenting CD4+ to CD8+ communications to promote cytotoxicity. Here, we hypothesized that activin exerts cell-specific effects in the tumor microenvironment (TME) of CRC to promote anti-tumoral activity of immune cells and the pro-metastatic behavior of tumor cells in a cell-specific and context-dependent manner. We generated an Smad4 epithelial cell specific knockout (Smad4-/-) which was crossed with TS4-Cre mice to identify SMAD-specific changes in CRC. We also performed IHC and digital spatial profiling (DSP) of tissue microarrays (TMAs) obtained from 1055 stage II and III CRC patients in the QUASAR 2 clinical trial. We transfected the CRC cells to reduce their activin production and injected them into mice with intermittent tumor measurements to determine how cancer-derived activin alters tumor growth in vivo. In vivo, Smad4-/- mice displayed elevated colonic activin and pAKT expression and increased mortality. IHC analysis of the TMA samples revealed increased activin was required for TGF-β-associated improved outcomes in CRC. DSP analysis identified that activin co-localization in the stroma was coupled with increases in T-cell exhaustion markers, activation markers of antigen presenting cells (APCs), and effectors of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Activin-stimulated PI3K-dependent CRC transwell migration, and the in vivo loss of activin lead to smaller CRC tumors. Taken together, activin is a targetable, highly context-dependent molecule with effects on CRC growth, migration, and TME immune plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark B. Wiley
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.B.W.); (K.M.)
| | - Jessica Bauer
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.B.W.); (K.M.)
| | - Kunaal Mehrotra
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.B.W.); (K.M.)
| | - Jasmin Zessner-Spitzenberg
- Clinical Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Zoe Kolics
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.B.W.); (K.M.)
| | - Wenxuan Cheng
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.B.W.); (K.M.)
| | - Karla Castellanos
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
| | - Michael G. Nash
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Xianyong Gui
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Lyonell Kone
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
| | - Ajay V. Maker
- Department of Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Guilin Qiao
- Department of Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA
| | - Deepti Reddi
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - David N. Church
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK
- NIHR Oxford Comprehensive Biomedical Research Center, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK
| | - Rachel S. Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK
| | - David J. Kerr
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 4BH, UK
| | - Paul J. Grippo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA
| | - Barbara Jung
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; (M.B.W.); (K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wiley MB, Bauer J, Mehrotra K, Church DN, Kerr RS, Kerr DJ, Grippo P, Jung B. Abstract B013: Activin’s influence on the tumor microenvironment in colon cancer. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.crc22-b013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aims: Activin A (activin) is a key molecule that regulates cell specific and context dependent signaling in tumor growth and metastasis as well as local and systemic inflammatory responses. Understanding the link between tumor-promotive and inflammatory effects may provide a novel opportunity for targeted therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC). We have previously shown that activin signaling promotes epithelial to mesenchymal transition, tumor migration, and that serum activin correlates with advanced stage in CRC patients. Recently, activin has been implicated in enhancing CD4+ to CD8+ communications to promote cytotoxic elimination of tumor cells. We now hypothesize that activin exerts cell-specific effects in the tumor microenvironment (TME) to both promote anti-tumoral activity of immune cells and pro-metastatic behavior of tumor cells in a context-dependent manner. Methods: Western blot and transwell migration assays with and without activin were performed in human epithelial colon cancer cells with varying expression levels of ACVR2 and in human colonic fibroblasts. The influence of the canonical Smad4 pathway was elucidated in a Ts4-Cre;Apcflox;Smad4flox mouse model for CRC. We analyzed a TMA of 1055 stage II and III CRC patients from the QUASAR2 cohort to correlate activin and CD4+ expression with outcome. The TMAs were also analyzed via Digital Spatial Profiling (DSP, NanoString) to determine the immune cell heterogeneity and cell signaling patterns within the tumor microenvironment relative to activin. Results: The non-canonical pAkt pathway is activated in ACVR2-restored but not ACVR2-mutated HCT116+chr2 colon cancer cells, which leads to tumor cell migration in a PI3K-dependent manner. In vivo, ablation of downstream canonical SMAD signaling is associated with elevated activin, alpha-SMA and pAkt and increases in tissue dysplasia, intestinal stromal disorganization, and animal mortality. While there are direct pro-metastatic effects of activin on tumor cells, activin expression in the TME of stage II or III CRC patients is associated with elevated CD4 and survival benefit (High activin/high CD4: 1.665 hazard ratio, 95% Cl of ratio 1.379 to 2.010). DSP analysis confirmed co-localization of activin with immune cells in the TME which influences cell signaling patterns found in these regions. Conclusion: In colon cancer cells, activin leads to preferential prometastatic PI3K/Akt pathway activation. Within the TME, high levels of activin in the presence of CD4+ T-cells is associated with better outcomes in CRC patients. This work lays the foundation to further study context-dependent activin signaling as an adjunct or target in CRC.
Citation Format: Mark B. Wiley, Jessica Bauer, Kunaal Mehrotra, David N. Church, Rachel S. Kerr, David J. Kerr, Paul Grippo, Barbara Jung. Activin’s influence on the tumor microenvironment in colon cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Colorectal Cancer; 2022 Oct 1-4; Portland, OR. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(23 Suppl_1):Abstract nr B013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Paul Grippo
- 3University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Watts K, Wills C, Madi A, Palles C, Maughan TS, Kaplan R, Al-Tassan NA, Kerr R, Kerr DJ, Houlston RS, Escott-Price V, Cheadle JP. Genetic variation in ST6GAL1 is a determinant of capecitabine and oxaliplatin induced hand-foot syndrome. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:957-966. [PMID: 35467766 PMCID: PMC9545609 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Cancer patients treated with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) often develop hand-foot syndrome (HFS) or palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia. Genetic variation in ST6GAL1 is a risk factor for type-2 diabetes (T2D), a disease also associated with HFS. We analysed genome-wide association data for 10 toxicities in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients from the COIN and COIN-B trials. One thousand and fifty-five patients were treated with XELOX ± cetuximab and 745 with folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin ± cetuximab. We also analysed rs6783836 in ST6GAL1 with HFS in CRC patients from QUASAR2. Using UK Biobank data, we sought to confirm an association between ST6GAL1 and T2D (17 384 cases, 317 887 controls) and analysed rs6783836 against markers of diabetes, inflammation and psoriasis. We found that 68% of patients from COIN and COIN-B with grade 2-3 HFS responded to treatment as compared to 58% with grade 0-1 HFS (odds ratio [OR] = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-1.2, P = 2.0 × 10-4 ). HFS was also associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.84-0.99, P = 4.6 × 10-2 ). rs6783836 at ST6GAL1 was associated with HFS in patients treated with XELOX (OR = 3.1, 95% CI = 2.1-4.6, P = 4.3 × 10-8 ) and was borderline significant in patients receiving capecitabine from QUASAR2, but with an opposite allele effect (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.42-1.03, P = .05). ST6GAL1 was associated with T2D (lead SNP rs3887925, OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.92-0.96, P = 1.2 × 10-8 ) and the rs6783836-T allele was associated with lowered HbA1c levels (P = 5.9 × 10-3 ) and lymphocyte count (P = 2.7 × 10-3 ), and psoriasis (P = 7.5 × 10-3 ) beyond thresholds for multiple testing. In conclusion, HFS is a biomarker of treatment outcome and rs6783836 in ST6GAL1 is a potential biomarker for HFS with links to T2D and inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Watts
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Christopher Wills
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Ayman Madi
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK
| | - Claire Palles
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, Institute of Biomedical Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Timothy S Maughan
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Kaplan
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College of London, London, UK
| | - Nada A Al-Tassan
- Department of Genetics, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard S Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Valentina Escott-Price
- Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jeremy P Cheadle
- Division of Cancer and Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kleppe A, Skrede OJ, De Raedt S, Hveem TS, Askautrud HA, Jacobsen JE, Church DN, Nesbakken A, Shepherd NA, Novelli M, Kerr R, Liestøl K, Kerr DJ, Danielsen HE. A clinical decision support system optimising adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancers by integrating deep learning and pathological staging markers: a development and validation study. Lancet Oncol 2022; 23:1221-1232. [PMID: 35964620 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00391-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The DoMore-v1-CRC marker was recently developed using deep learning and conventional haematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections, and was observed to outperform established molecular and morphological markers of patient outcome after primary colorectal cancer resection. The aim of the present study was to develop a clinical decision support system based on DoMore-v1-CRC and pathological staging markers to facilitate individualised selection of adjuvant treatment. METHODS We estimated cancer-specific survival in subgroups formed by pathological tumour stage (pT<4 or pT4), pathological nodal stage (pN0, pN1, or pN2), number of lymph nodes sampled (≤12 or >12) if not pN2, and DoMore-v1-CRC classification (good, uncertain, or poor prognosis) in 997 patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer considered to have no residual tumour (R0) from two community-based cohorts in Norway and the UK, and used these data to define three risk groups. An external cohort of 1075 patients with stage II or III R0 colorectal cancer from the QUASAR 2 trial was used for validation; these patients were treated with single-agent capecitabine. The proposed risk stratification system was evaluated using Cox regression analysis. We similarly evaluated a risk stratification system intended to reflect current guidelines and clinical practice. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival. FINDINGS The new risk stratification system provided a hazard ratio of 10·71 (95% CI 6·39-17·93; p<0·0001) for high-risk versus low-risk patients and 3·06 (1·73-5·42; p=0·0001) for intermediate versus low risk in the primary analysis of the validation cohort. Estimated 3-year cancer-specific survival was 97·2% (95% CI 95·1-98·4; n=445 [41%]) for the low-risk group, 94·8% (91·7-96·7; n=339 [32%]) for the intermediate-risk group, and 77·6% (72·1-82·1; n=291 [27%]) for the high-risk group. The guideline-based risk grouping was observed to be less prognostic and informative (the low-risk group comprised only 142 [13%] of the 1075 patients). INTERPRETATION Integrating DoMore-v1-CRC and pathological staging markers provided a clinical decision support system that risk stratifies more accurately than its constituent elements, and identifies substantially more patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer with similarly good prognosis as the low-risk group in current guidelines. Avoiding adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients might be safe, and could reduce morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. FUNDING The Research Council of Norway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole-Johan Skrede
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sepp De Raedt
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tarjei S Hveem
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne A Askautrud
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jørn E Jacobsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Development, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - David N Church
- National Institute of Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo, Norway
| | - Neil A Shepherd
- Gloucestershire Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Marco Novelli
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Research Department of Pathology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barnes E, Brown G, Kerr DJ. The UK benefits from a truly National Health Service. Lancet 2022; 400:78-80. [PMID: 35752195 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01182-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gordon Brown
- Our Scottish Future, Glasgow, UK; Office of Gordon and Sarah Brown, London, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wiley MB, Bauer J, Mehrotra K, Zessner‐Spitzenberg J, Kone L, Quiao G, Castellanos K, Church DN, Kerr RS, Kerr DJ, Grippo P, Maker A, Jung B. The Influence of Activin on the Tumor Microenvironment in Colon Cancer Metastasis. FASEB J 2022. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.r2434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Guilin Quiao
- SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCA
| | | | | | | | | | - Paul Grippo
- MedicineUniversity of Illinois, ChicagoChicagoIL
| | - Ajay Maker
- SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoCA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marshall JL, Peshkin BN, Yoshino T, Vowinckel J, Danielsen HE, Melino G, Tsamardinos I, Haudenschild C, Kerr DJ, Sampaio C, Rha SY, FitzGerald KT, Holland EC, Gallagher D, Garcia-Foncillas J, Juhl H. OUP accepted manuscript. Oncologist 2022; 27:272-284. [PMID: 35380712 PMCID: PMC8982374 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyab048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- John L Marshall
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Corresponding author: John L. Marshall, MD, The Ruesch Center for the Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Frederick P. Smith Endowed Chair, Chief, Hematology and Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3800 Reservoir Road, Washington, DC 20007, USA. Tel: +1 202 444 2223;
| | - Beth N Peshkin
- Georgetown University, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Montebello, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gerry Melino
- Department of Experimental Medicine, TOR, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Ioannis Tsamardinos
- JADBio Gnosis DA, N. Plastira 100, Science and Technology Park of Crete and Institute of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas, Heraklion, GR, Greece
| | | | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, Level 4, Academic Block, John Radcliffe Infirmary, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Sun Young Rha
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-Ku, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kevin T FitzGerald
- Department of Medical Humanities in the School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Eric C Holland
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Gallagher
- St. James’s Hospital/Trinity College Dublin, St. Raphael’s House, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
- Cancer Institute, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Affiliation(s)
- David J Kerr
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom; Oxford-Sichuan Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom.
| | - Li Yang
- Oxford-Sichuan Gastrointestinal Cancer Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DS, United Kingdom; Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jiang D, Hveem TS, Glaire M, Church DN, Kerr DJ, Yang L, Danielsen HE. Automated assessment of CD8 + T-lymphocytes and stroma fractions complement conventional staging of colorectal cancer. EBioMedicine 2021; 71:103547. [PMID: 34479131 PMCID: PMC8411014 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tumor development is critically dependent on the supporting stroma consisting of inflammatory cells and fibroblasts. This study intended to improve prognostic prediction for early colorectal cancer (CRC) by combined estimation of T-lymphocyte and stroma fractions with conventional markers. METHODS In total 509 and 1041 stage II/ΙΙΙ CRC from the VICTOR and QUASAR 2 trials were included as a training set and a validation set, respectively. Intratumoral CD8+ T-lymphocytes and stroma were identified and quantified by machine-based learning on digital sections. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the prognostic value of the combined marker for time to recurrence (TTR). FINDINGS For low-risk patients (n = 598; stage Ⅱ, and stage ΙΙΙ pT1-3 pN1 with neither lymphatic (L-) nor vascular (V-) invasion), low stroma fraction (n = 511) identified a good prognostic subgroup with 5-year TTR of 86% (95% CI 83-89), versus the high stroma subgroup TTR of 78% (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.05-2.92; P = 0.029). For high-risk patients (n = 394; stage ΙΙΙ pT3 pN1 L+/V+, pT4, or pN2), combined low CD8+ and high stroma fraction identified a poor prognostic subgroup (n = 34) with 5-year TTR of 29% (95% CI 17-50), versus the high CD8+ fraction and low stroma fraction subgroup (n = 138) of 64% (HR = 2.86, 95% CI 1.75-4.69; P < 0.001). INTERPRETATION Quantification of intratumoral CD8+ T-lymphocyte and stroma fractions can be combined with conventional prognostic markers to improve patient stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Jiang
- Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Tarjei S Hveem
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mark Glaire
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David N Church
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - David J Kerr
- Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Li Yang
- Sichuan University-University of Oxford Huaxi Joint Centre for Gastrointestinal Cancer, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jones HJS, Cunningham C, Askautrud HA, Danielsen HE, Kerr DJ, Domingo E, Maughan T, Leedham SJ, Koelzer VH. Stromal composition predicts recurrence of early rectal cancer after local excision. Histopathology 2021; 79:947-956. [PMID: 34174109 PMCID: PMC8845517 DOI: 10.1111/his.14438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS After local excision of early rectal cancer, definitive lymph node status is not available. An alternative means for accurate assessment of recurrence risk is required to determine the most appropriate subsequent management. Currently used measures are suboptimal. We assess three measures of tumour stromal content to determine their predictive value after local excision in a well-characterised cohort of rectal cancer patients without prior radiotherapy. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 143 patients were included. Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections were scanned for (i) deep neural network (DNN, a machine-learning algorithm) tumour segmentation into compartments including desmoplastic stroma and inflamed stroma; and (ii) digital assessment of tumour stromal fraction (TSR) and optical DNA ploidy analysis. 3' mRNA sequencing was performed to obtain gene expression data from which stromal and immune scores were calculated using the ESTIMATE method. Full results were available for 139 samples and compared with disease-free survival. All three methods were prognostic. Most strongly predictive was a DNN-determined ratio of desmoplastic to inflamed stroma >5.41 (P < 0.0001). A ratio of ESTIMATE stromal to immune score <1.19 was also predictive of disease-free survival (P = 0.00051), as was stromal fraction >36.5% (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS The DNN-determined ratio of desmoplastic to inflamed ratio is a novel and powerful predictor of disease recurrence in locally excised early rectal cancer. It can be assessed on a single H&E section, so could be applied in routine clinical practice to improve the prognostic information available to patients and clinicians to inform the decision concerning further management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen J S Jones
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Chris Cunningham
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Hanne A Askautrud
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Enric Domingo
- Department of Oncology, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Tim Maughan
- Department of Oncology, MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Simon J Leedham
- Intestinal Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Viktor H Koelzer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University and University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.,Department of Oncology and Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Marshall J, Yoshino T, Rha SY, Church DN, Coutinho AK, Sampaio-Filho CA, Gallagher DJ, García-Foncillas J, von der Heyde S, Juhl H, Woodsmith J, Kerr DJ. Multi-omics characterization of left-right colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.3542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3542 Background: Right (R) vs left (L) sided colorectal cancers are clinically distinguishable based on prognosis and response to certain therapies, but as of yet, limited data have emerged to explain these differences. The science of molecular testing has evolved rapidly. Enabled by improved technologies and computing power, it is now feasible to obtain to systematic multi-omic datasets covering DNA, RNA, proteins, phospho-proteins and metabolomics on large numbers of patients. Multi-omic analysis can further define disease specific subgroups but pre-analytic quality of the tissues (ischemia time) and comparison to normal tissue controls is paramount to optimize results. Methods: Following informed consent, 450 colorectal cancer primary tumors and paired normal tissues were collected following an SOP to minimize ischemia time, and were analyzed using comprehensive genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, phosphoproteomics, morphology and annual clinical information. Right (C18.0,2,3) and left (C18.6,7) CRC tumors, normal tissue were compared using machine learning tools to unravel the molecular mechanisms that underpin these clinically distinguishable phenotypes as well as correlating with known genomic metrics such MSI and KRAS mutation status. Results: Through leveraging the tumor and paired normal patient samples, systematic differences between left and right tumor samples were observed including specific molecular events associated with these anatomical differences. The detailed results will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Progress in precision medicine requires the inclusion of multi-omics which in turn requires changes to our current SOPs of tissue collection. The ability to define molecular distinctions such as between R and L colon cancer will permit the rapid discovery of clinically useful prognostic and predictive markers, dramatically adding to our fundamental understanding to colon cancer biology. Future work will focus on the discovery of novel targets and signatures, creating innovative tools that depict multi-omic results for clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sun Young Rha
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | | | - Jesús García-Foncillas
- Oncology Department and Translational Oncology Division, University Hospital Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Affiliation(s)
- David J Kerr
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rachel S Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
The number of publications on deep learning for cancer diagnostics is rapidly increasing, and systems are frequently claimed to perform comparable with or better than clinicians. However, few systems have yet demonstrated real-world medical utility. In this Perspective, we discuss reasons for the moderate progress and describe remedies designed to facilitate transition to the clinic. Recent, presumably influential, deep learning studies in cancer diagnostics, of which the vast majority used images as input to the system, are evaluated to reveal the status of the field. By manipulating real data, we then exemplify that much and varied training data facilitate the generalizability of neural networks and thus the ability to use them clinically. To reduce the risk of biased performance estimation of deep learning systems, we advocate evaluation in external cohorts and strongly advise that the planned analyses, including a predefined primary analysis, are described in a protocol preferentially stored in an online repository. Recommended protocol items should be established for the field, and we present our suggestions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole-Johan Skrede
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sepp De Raedt
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liestøl K, Kleppe A, Skrede OJ, De Raedt S, Kerr DJ, Danielsen HE. Deep learning and cancer biomarkers: recognising lead-time bias - Authors' reply. Lancet 2021; 397:194-195. [PMID: 33453777 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00035-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Liestøl
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo NO-0424, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo NO-0424, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ole-Johan Skrede
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo NO-0424, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sepp De Raedt
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo NO-0424, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo NO-0424, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jazieh AR, Chan SL, Curigliano G, Dickson N, Eaton V, Garcia-Foncillas J, Gilmore T, Horn L, Kerr DJ, Lee J, Mathias C, Nogueira-Rodrigues A, Pierce L, Rogado A, Schilsky RL, Soria JC, Warner JL, Yoshida K. Delivering Cancer Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations and Lessons Learned From ASCO Global Webinars. JCO Glob Oncol 2020; 6:1461-1471. [PMID: 32997537 PMCID: PMC7529523 DOI: 10.1200/go.20.00423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the ASCO launched a Global Webinar Series to address various aspects of cancer care during the pandemic. Here we present the lessons learned and recommendations that have emerged from these webinars. METHODS Fifteen international health care experts from different global regions and oncology disciplines participated in one of the six 1-hour webinars to discuss the latest data, share their experiences, and provide recommendations to manage cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. These sessions include didactic presentations followed by a moderated discussion and questions from the audience. All recommendations have been transcribed, categorized, and reviewed by the experts, who have also approved the consensus recommendations. RESULTS The summary recommendations are divided into different categories, including risk minimization; care prioritization of patients; health care team management; virtual care; management of patients with cancer undergoing surgical, radiation, and systemic therapy; clinical research; and recovery plans. The recommendations emphasize the protection of patients and health care teams from infections, delivery of timely and appropriate care, reduction of harm from the interruption of care, and preparation to handle a surge of new COVID-19 cases, complications, or comorbidities thereof. CONCLUSION The recommendations from the ASCO Global Webinar Series may guide practicing oncologists to manage their patients during the ongoing pandemic and help organizations recover from the crisis. Implementation of these recommendations may improve understanding of how COVID-19 has affected cancer care and increase readiness to manage the current and any future outbreaks effectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Rahman Jazieh
- King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Stephen L. Chan
- State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS and University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Jesus Garcia-Foncillas
- Department of Oncology, Oncohealth Institute, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz University Hospital, Autonomous University, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lori Pierce
- Rogel Cancer Center, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Alvaro Rogado
- ECO Foundation for Excellence and Quality in Oncology, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Kazuhiro Yoshida
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Skrede OJ, De Raedt S, Kleppe A, Hveem TS, Liestøl K, Maddison J, Askautrud HA, Pradhan M, Nesheim JA, Albregtsen F, Farstad IN, Domingo E, Church DN, Nesbakken A, Shepherd NA, Tomlinson I, Kerr R, Novelli M, Kerr DJ, Danielsen HE. Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study. Lancet 2020; 395:350-360. [PMID: 32007170 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32998-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 275] [Impact Index Per Article: 68.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved markers of prognosis are needed to stratify patients with early-stage colorectal cancer to refine selection of adjuvant therapy. The aim of the present study was to develop a biomarker of patient outcome after primary colorectal cancer resection by directly analysing scanned conventional haematoxylin and eosin stained sections using deep learning. METHODS More than 12 000 000 image tiles from patients with a distinctly good or poor disease outcome from four cohorts were used to train a total of ten convolutional neural networks, purpose-built for classifying supersized heterogeneous images. A prognostic biomarker integrating the ten networks was determined using patients with a non-distinct outcome. The marker was tested on 920 patients with slides prepared in the UK, and then independently validated according to a predefined protocol in 1122 patients treated with single-agent capecitabine using slides prepared in Norway. All cohorts included only patients with resectable tumours, and a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour tissue block available for analysis. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival. FINDINGS 828 patients from four cohorts had a distinct outcome and were used as a training cohort to obtain clear ground truth. 1645 patients had a non-distinct outcome and were used for tuning. The biomarker provided a hazard ratio for poor versus good prognosis of 3·84 (95% CI 2·72-5·43; p<0·0001) in the primary analysis of the validation cohort, and 3·04 (2·07-4·47; p<0·0001) after adjusting for established prognostic markers significant in univariable analyses of the same cohort, which were pN stage, pT stage, lymphatic invasion, and venous vascular invasion. INTERPRETATION A clinically useful prognostic marker was developed using deep learning allied to digital scanning of conventional haematoxylin and eosin stained tumour tissue sections. The assay has been extensively evaluated in large, independent patient populations, correlates with and outperforms established molecular and morphological prognostic markers, and gives consistent results across tumour and nodal stage. The biomarker stratified stage II and III patients into sufficiently distinct prognostic groups that potentially could be used to guide selection of adjuvant treatment by avoiding therapy in very low risk groups and identifying patients who would benefit from more intensive treatment regimes. FUNDING The Research Council of Norway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ole-Johan Skrede
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sepp De Raedt
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tarjei S Hveem
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Liestøl
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - John Maddison
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne A Askautrud
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Manohar Pradhan
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - John Arne Nesheim
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fritz Albregtsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inger Nina Farstad
- Department of Pathology, Division of Laboratory Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Enric Domingo
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David N Church
- Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; National Institute of Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; KG Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo, Norway
| | - Neil A Shepherd
- Gloucestershire Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Marco Novelli
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Research Department of Pathology, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ersvaer E, Hveem TS, Vlatkovic L, Brennhovd B, Kleppe A, Tobin KAR, Pradhan M, Cyll K, Waehre H, Kerr DJ, Danielsen HE. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy and automated assessment of stroma fraction in prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1228-1234. [PMID: 31846064 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The combination of DNA ploidy and automatically estimated stroma fraction has been shown to correlate with recurrence and cancer death in colorectal cancer. We aimed to extend this observation and evaluate the prognostic importance of this combined marker in prostate cancer. DNA ploidy status was determined by image cytometry and the stroma fraction was estimated automatically on hematoxylin and eosin stained sections in three tumor samples from each patient to account for tumor heterogeneity. The optimal threshold for low (≤56%) and high (>56%) stroma fraction was identified in a discovery cohort (n = 253). The combined marker was validated in an independent patient cohort (n = 259) with biochemical recurrence as endpoint. The combined marker predicted biochemical recurrence independently in the validation cohort. Multivariable analysis showed that the highest risk of recurrence was observed for patients with samples that had both non-diploid ploidy status and a high stroma fraction (hazard ratio: 2.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.18-5.34). In conclusion, we suggest the combination of DNA ploidy and automatically estimated stroma fraction as a prognostic marker for the risk stratification of prostate cancer patients. It may also be a potential generic marker as concurrent results have been described in colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin Ersvaer
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tarjei S Hveem
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ljiljana Vlatkovic
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Brennhovd
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kari A R Tobin
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Manohar Pradhan
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karolina Cyll
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Håkon Waehre
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fotheringham S, Mozolowski GA, Murray EMA, Kerr DJ. Challenges and solutions in patient treatment strategies for stage II colon cancer. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2019; 7:151-161. [PMID: 31217978 PMCID: PMC6573795 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goz006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Revised: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer remains one of the most common cancers worldwide and, despite improvements in treatment options for late-stage metastatic cancer, there are still questions surrounding how best to treat early-stage disease patients. Some recent advances have been made in the staging of cancer and improving the risk assessment of strategies for patient treatment. A number of high-risk features have been proposed that may help to stratify stage II cancer patients into groups that will truly benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Diagnostic tests are becoming available to measure these biomarkers, utilizing both currently available and novel technologies. This review will describe the challenges in treatment decisions for early-stage colon cancer and how personalized medicine can assist clinicians in making the best treatment choices for patients with stage II colon cancer in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Fotheringham
- Oxford Cancer Biomarkers Limited, The Magdalen Centre, The Oxford Science Park, Robert Robinson Avenue, Oxford, UK
| | - Guy A Mozolowski
- Oxford Cancer Biomarkers Limited, The Magdalen Centre, The Oxford Science Park, Robert Robinson Avenue, Oxford, UK
| | - Eleanor M A Murray
- The Medical School, The University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Oxford Cancer Biomarkers Limited, The Magdalen Centre, The Oxford Science Park, Robert Robinson Avenue, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Level 4 Academic Block, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jiang W, Cai MY, Li SY, Bei JX, Wang F, Hampel H, Ling YH, Frayling IM, Sinicrope FA, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Dignam JJ, Kerr DJ, Rosell R, Mao M, Li JB, Guo YM, Wu XY, Kong LH, Tang JH, Wu XD, Li CF, Chen JR, Ou QJ, Ye MZ, Guo FM, Han P, Wang QW, Wan DS, Li L, Xu RH, Pan ZZ, Ding PR. Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in a large consecutive cohort of Chinese colorectal cancer patients: High prevalence and unique molecular features. Int J Cancer 2019; 144:2161-2168. [PMID: 30521064 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The prevalence of Lynch syndrome (LS) varies significantly in different populations, suggesting that ethnic features might play an important role. We enrolled 3330 consecutive Chinese patients who had surgical resection for newly diagnosed colorectal cancer. Universal screening for LS was implemented, including immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, BRAFV600E mutation test and germline sequencing. Among the 3250 eligible patients, MMR protein deficiency (dMMR) was detected in 330 (10.2%) patients. Ninety-three patients (2.9%) were diagnosed with LS. Nine (9.7%) patients with LS fulfilled Amsterdam criteria II and 76 (81.7%) met the revised Bethesda guidelines. Only 15 (9.7%) patients with absence of MLH1 on IHC had BRAFV600E mutation. One third (33/99) of the MMR gene mutations have not been reported previously. The age of onset indicates risk of LS in patients with dMMR tumors. For patients older than 65 years, only 2 patients (5.7%) fulfilling revised Bethesda guidelines were diagnosed with LS. Selective sequencing of all cases with dMMR diagnosed at or below age 65 years and only of those dMMR cases older than 65 years who fulfill revised Bethesda guidelines results in 8.2% fewer cases requiring germline testing without missing any LS diagnoses. While the prevalence of LS in Chinese patients is similar to that of Western populations, the spectrum of constitutional mutations and frequency of BRAFV600E mutation is different. Patients older than 65 years who do not meet the revised Bethesda guidelines have a low risk of LS, suggesting germline sequencing might not be necessary in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wu Jiang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Mu-Yan Cai
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shi-Yong Li
- BGI-Guangzhou Medical Laboratory, BGI-Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Jin-Xin Bei
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Fang Wang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Heather Hampel
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Yi-Hong Ling
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ian M Frayling
- Institute of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.,All-Wales Medical Genetics Service, Institute of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - James J Dignam
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL
| | - David J Kerr
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, OCRB, Churchill Campus, Headington, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rafael Rosell
- Catalan Institute of Oncology, Germans Trias i Pujol Health Sciences Institute and Hospital, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mao Mao
- BGI-Guangzhou Medical Laboratory, BGI-Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Ji-Bin Li
- Department of Clinical Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yun-Miao Guo
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Yan Wu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling-Heng Kong
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jing-Hua Tang
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Dan Wu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao-Feng Li
- Department of Information Technology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jie-Rong Chen
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Qing-Jian Ou
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Ming-Zhi Ye
- BGI-Guangzhou Medical Laboratory, BGI-Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng-Ming Guo
- BGI-Guangzhou Medical Laboratory, BGI-Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Peng Han
- BGI-Guangzhou Medical Laboratory, BGI-Shenzhen, People's Republic of China
| | - Qi-Wei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - De-Sen Wan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Li
- Imaging Diagnosis and Interventional Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhi-Zhong Pan
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Pei-Rong Ding
- Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Glaire M, Domingo E, Nicholson G, Novelli M, Lawson K, Oukrif D, Kidal W, Danielsen HE, Kerr R, Kerr DJ, Tomlinson I, Church DN. Tumour-infiltrating CD8 + lymphocytes as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer: A retrospective, pooled analysis of the QUASAR2 and VICTOR trials. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.3515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Glaire
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Enric Domingo
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - George Nicholson
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Marco Novelli
- Department of Histopathology, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kay Lawson
- Department of Histopathology, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dahmane Oukrif
- Department of Histopathology, UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wanja Kidal
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo, Norway
| | - Havard Emil Danielsen
- Oslo University Hospital, Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rachel Kerr
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Huijbers A, van Pelt GW, Kerr RS, Johnstone EC, Tollenaar RAEM, Kerr DJ, Mesker WE. The value of additional bevacizumab in patients with high-risk stroma-high colon cancer. A study within the QUASAR2 trial, an open-label randomized phase 3 trial. J Surg Oncol 2018; 117:1043-1048. [PMID: 29448309 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with a high stroma percentage within the primary tumor have a poor prognosis. In this study, we investigate whether anti-angiogenic therapy might improve survival of patients with a stroma-high profile with potentially increased angiogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tissue samples of the primary tumor of 965 colon cancer patients participating in the QUASAR2 trial were analyzed for tumor-stroma ratio (TSR). Stroma-high (>50%) and stroma-low (≤50%) groups were evaluated with respect to survival. RESULTS Disease free survival (DFS) was significantly lower in the stroma-high group (HR 1.53, 95%CI 1.19-1.95, P = 0.001). No difference in DFS was seen with respect to treatment with capecitabine alone (CAP) or capecitabine with bevacizumab (CAPBEV) (Stroma-high HR 1.00, 95%CI 0.69-1.46, P = 0.996; stroma-low HR 1.02, 95%CI 0.75-1.41, P = 0.883). A significant difference in survival was seen comparing groups with or without vascular invasion (DFS P < 0.001). A correlation between vascular invasion and stroma-high was seen (χ2 -test P = 0.043). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The TSR confirmed to be a strong prognosticator for disease-free survival in a selected high-risk patient population. No benefit was found in response to treatment with bevacizumab when stratified for TSR. TSR showed to have an additional prognostic value in patients with vascular invasion present in the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouck Huijbers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden Universal Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gabi W van Pelt
- Department of Surgery, Leiden Universal Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel S Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rob A E M Tollenaar
- Department of Surgery, Leiden Universal Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Wilma E Mesker
- Department of Surgery, Leiden Universal Medical Centre (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kerr DJ. Change is needed to correct the lack of veterinary dental education at the undergraduate level. Can Vet J 2018; 59:314. [PMID: 29599563 PMCID: PMC5819044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David J Kerr
- North Hill Animal Hospital, 12612 Hwy 50 Unit 11, Bolton, Ontario L7E 1T6
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kleppe A, Albregtsen F, Vlatkovic L, Pradhan M, Nielsen B, Hveem TS, Askautrud HA, Kristensen GB, Nesbakken A, Trovik J, Wæhre H, Tomlinson I, Shepherd NA, Novelli M, Kerr DJ, Danielsen HE. Chromatin organisation and cancer prognosis: a pan-cancer study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19:356-369. [PMID: 29402700 PMCID: PMC5842159 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30899-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chromatin organisation affects gene expression and regional mutation frequencies and contributes to carcinogenesis. Aberrant organisation of DNA has been correlated with cancer prognosis in analyses of the chromatin component of tumour cell nuclei using image texture analysis. As yet, the methodology has not been sufficiently validated to permit its clinical application. We aimed to define and validate a novel prognostic biomarker for the automatic detection of heterogeneous chromatin organisation. METHODS Machine learning algorithms analysed the chromatin organisation in 461 000 images of tumour cell nuclei stained for DNA from 390 patients (discovery cohort) treated for stage I or II colorectal cancer at the Aker University Hospital (Oslo, Norway). The resulting marker of chromatin heterogeneity, termed Nucleotyping, was subsequently independently validated in six patient cohorts: 442 patients with stage I or II colorectal cancer in the Gloucester Colorectal Cancer Study (UK); 391 patients with stage II colorectal cancer in the QUASAR 2 trial; 246 patients with stage I ovarian carcinoma; 354 patients with uterine sarcoma; 307 patients with prostate carcinoma; and 791 patients with endometrial carcinoma. The primary outcome was cancer-specific survival. FINDINGS In all patient cohorts, patients with chromatin heterogeneous tumours had worse cancer-specific survival than patients with chromatin homogeneous tumours (univariable analysis hazard ratio [HR] 1·7, 95% CI 1·2-2·5, in the discovery cohort; 1·8, 1·0-3·0, in the Gloucester validation cohort; 2·2, 1·1-4·5, in the QUASAR 2 validation cohort; 3·1, 1·9-5·0, in the ovarian carcinoma cohort; 2·5, 1·8-3·4, in the uterine sarcoma cohort; 2·3, 1·2-4·6, in the prostate carcinoma cohort; and 4·3, 2·8-6·8, in the endometrial carcinoma cohort). After adjusting for established prognostic patient characteristics in multivariable analyses, Nucleotyping was prognostic in all cohorts except for the prostate carcinoma cohort (HR 1·7, 95% CI 1·1-2·5, in the discovery cohort; 1·9, 1·1-3·2, in the Gloucester validation cohort; 2·6, 1·2-5·6, in the QUASAR 2 cohort; 1·8, 1·1-3·0, for ovarian carcinoma; 1·6, 1·0-2·4, for uterine sarcoma; 1·43, 0·68-2·99, for prostate carcinoma; and 1·9, 1·1-3·1, for endometrial carcinoma). Chromatin heterogeneity was a significant predictor of cancer-specific survival in microsatellite unstable (HR 2·9, 95% CI 1·0-8·4) and microsatellite stable (1·8, 1·2-2·7) stage II colorectal cancer, but microsatellite instability was not a significant predictor of outcome in chromatin homogeneous (1·3, 0·7-2·4) or chromatin heterogeneous (0·8, 0·3-2·0) stage II colorectal cancer. INTERPRETATION The consistent prognostic prediction of Nucleotyping in different biological and technical circumstances suggests that the marker of chromatin heterogeneity can be reliably assessed in routine clinical practice and could be used to objectively assist decision making in a range of clinical settings. An immediate application would be to identify high-risk patients with stage II colorectal cancer who might have greater absolute benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the survival benefit and cost-effectiveness of using Nucleotyping to guide treatment decisions in multiple clinical settings. FUNDING The Research Council of Norway, the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority, the National Institute for Health Research, and the Wellcome Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Fritz Albregtsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Manohar Pradhan
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Birgitte Nielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tarjei S Hveem
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hanne A Askautrud
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunnar B Kristensen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Nesbakken
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jone Trovik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Håkon Wæhre
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Oxford Centre for Cancer Gene Research, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Neil A Shepherd
- Gloucestershire Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK
| | - Marco Novelli
- Department of Histopathology, University College London, London, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Danielsen HE, Hveem TS, Domingo E, Pradhan M, Kleppe A, Syvertsen RA, Kostolomov I, Nesheim JA, Askautrud HA, Nesbakken A, Lothe RA, Svindland A, Shepherd N, Novelli M, Johnstone E, Tomlinson I, Kerr R, Kerr DJ. Prognostic markers for colorectal cancer: estimating ploidy and stroma. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:616-623. [PMID: 29293881 PMCID: PMC5889021 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We report here the prognostic value of ploidy and digital tumour-stromal morphometric analyses using material from 2624 patients with early stage colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and methods DNA content (ploidy) and stroma-tumour fraction were estimated using automated digital imaging systems and DNA was extracted from sections of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue for analysis of microsatellite instability. Samples were available from 1092 patients recruited to the QUASAR 2 trial and two large observational series (Gloucester, n = 954; Oslo University Hospital, n = 578). Resultant biomarkers were analysed for prognostic impact using 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) as the clinical end point. Results Ploidy and stroma-tumour fraction were significantly prognostic in a multivariate model adjusted for age, adjuvant treatment, and pathological T-stage in stage II patients, and the combination of ploidy and stroma-tumour fraction was found to stratify these patients into three clinically useful groups; 5-year CSS 90% versus 83% versus 73% [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.77 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.13-2.77) and HR = 2.95 (95% CI: 1.73-5.03), P < 0.001]. Conclusion A novel biomarker, combining estimates of ploidy and stroma-tumour fraction, sampled from FFPE tissue, identifies stage II CRC patients with low, intermediate or high risk of CRC disease specific death, and can reliably stratify clinically relevant patient sub-populations with differential risks of tumour recurrence and may support choice of adjuvant therapy for these individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - T S Hveem
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - E Domingo
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Pradhan
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - R A Syvertsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - I Kostolomov
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - J A Nesheim
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - H A Askautrud
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - A Nesbakken
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo
| | - R A Lothe
- Centre for Cancer Biomedicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; K.G. Jebsen Colorectal Cancer Research Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo; Department of Molecular Oncology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital - Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo; Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo
| | - A Svindland
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo; Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - N Shepherd
- Gloucestershire Cellular Pathology Laboratory, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham
| | - M Novelli
- Research Department of Pathology, University College London Medical School, London, UK
| | - E Johnstone
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - I Tomlinson
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D J Kerr
- Nuffield Division of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Baines LS, Kerr DJ. Donors, Noncommunicable Diseases, and Universal Health Coverage to High-quality Healthcare: An Opportunity for Action on Global Functions for Health. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2018; 8:236. [PMID: 30864770 PMCID: PMC7377555 DOI: 10.2991/j.jegh.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsay S. Baines
- Department of Preventative Medicine & Biostatistics, Uniform Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA
| | - David J. Kerr
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
There is an increasing focus on the relative cost-effectiveness and sustainability of delivering high-quality cancer care, with most emphasis, debatably, given to cost control of innovative treatments. It is difficult to calculate all the direct and indirect contributors to the total cost of cancer treatment, but it is estimated that cancer drugs constitute 10% to 30% of the total cost of cancer care. A 2007 study in France showed the contribution of drug costs was less than 20%, with approximately 70% of the total expenditure on cancer accounted for by health care resource use, such as hospitalization. The U.K. government established the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)-the dominant function of which is technology appraisal-to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of new pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products. This is to ensure that all National Health Service (NHS) patients have equitable access to the most clinically effective and cost-effective treatments that are viable. NICE has developed a transparent, public process to judge incremental cost-effectiveness using the quality-adjusted life year (QALY), which allows comparisons of cost-effectiveness across medical specialties. NICE has been both lauded and criticized-especially when it passes judgment on marginally effective but expensive anticancer drugs-but it provides a route to "rational rationing" and, therefore, may contribute to sustainable cancer care by highlighting the issue of affordable medicine. This implies a challenge to the wider oncology community as to how we might cooperate to introduce the concept of value-driven cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Kerr
- From the Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Anant Jani
- From the Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sir Muir Gray
- From the Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kerr RS, Love S, Segelov E, Johnstone E, Falcon B, Hewett P, Weaver A, Church D, Scudder C, Pearson S, Julier P, Pezzella F, Tomlinson I, Domingo E, Kerr DJ. Adjuvant capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in patients with colorectal cancer (QUASAR 2): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17:1543-1557. [PMID: 27660192 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30172-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Revised: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antiangiogenic agents have established efficacy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We investigated whether bevacizumab could improve disease-free survival in the adjuvant setting after resection of the primary tumour. METHODS For the open-label, randomised, controlled QUASAR 2 trial, which was done at 170 hospitals in seven countries, we recruited patients aged 18 years or older with WHO performance status scores of 0 or 1 who had undergone potentially curative surgery for histologically proven stage III or high-risk stage II colorectal cancer. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive eight 3-week cycles of oral capecitabine alone (1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days followed by a break for 7 days) or the same regimen of oral capecitabine plus 16 cycles of 7·5 mg/kg bevacizumab by intravenous infusion over 90 min on day 1 of each cycle. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated schedule with use of minimisation with a random element stratified by age, disease stage, tumour site, and country. The study was open label and no-one was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Toxic effects were assessed in patients who received at least one dose of randomised treatment. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN45133151. FINDINGS Between April 25, 2005, and Oct 12, 2010, 1952 eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 1941 had assessable data (968 in the capecitabine alone group and 973 in the capecitabine and bevacizumab group). Median follow-up was 4·92 years (IQR 4·00-5·16). Disease-free survival at 3 years did not differ between the groups (75·4%, 95% CI 72·5-78·0 in the capecitabine and bevacizumab group vs 78·4%, 75·7-80·9 in the capecitabine alone group; hazard ratio 1·06, 95% CI 0·89-1·25, p=0·54). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (201 [21%] of 963 in the capecitabine alone group vs 257 [27%] of 959 in the capecitabine and bevacizumab group) and diarrhoea (102 [11%] vs 104 [11%]), and, with the addition of bevacizumab, expected increases were recorded in all-grade hypertension (320 [33%] vs 75 [8%]), proteinuria (197 [21%] vs 49 [5%]), and wound healing problems (30 [3%] vs 17 [2%]). 571 serious adverse events were reported (221 with capecitabine alone and 350 with capecitabine and bevacizumab). Most of these were gastrointestinal (n=245) or cardiovascular (n=169). 23 deaths within 6 months of randomisation were classified as being related to treatment, eight in the capecitabine alone group and 15 in the capecitabine and bevacizumab group. INTERPRETATION The addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine in the adjuvant setting for colorectal cancer yielded no benefit in the treatment of an unselected population and should not be used. FUNDING Roche.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel S Kerr
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Sharon Love
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Eva Segelov
- Department of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | - Peter Hewett
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | - David Church
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire Scudder
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Pearson
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Patrick Julier
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Ian Tomlinson
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Enric Domingo
- Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Affiliation(s)
- David J Kerr
- John Radcliffe Infirmary, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kerr DJ, Danielsen H. Chromatin instability as a marker of poor prognosis for a range of malignancies. J Clin Oncol 2016. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.11586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
32
|
|
33
|
Bell DJ, Kerr DJ. Pharmacokinetic considerations in the use of anticancer drugs during pregnancy: challenges and new developments. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2015; 11:1341-4. [DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2015.1055247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
34
|
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third commonest cancer in the Western world. Approximately one-quarter of cases are classified as Stage II/Dukes' B, meaning that the disease has breached the bowel wall but not spread to draining lymph nodes or distant sites. Stage II colon cancer is a heterogeneous disease both biologically and in terms of outcome. Although pivotal data have confirmed the benefit of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (FU) chemotherapy following resection of stage II tumours the absolute reduction in risk of recurrence is small - 3 to 4 percentage points - and so most patients treated fail to gain from therapy. In contrast to stage III disease, the addition of oxaliplatin to FU as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II disease does not improve outcome. Much attention has focused on the identification of biomarkers that identify patients more or less likely to benefit from treatment. Recent data confirm that patients with T3 primary and tumour microsatellite instability (MSI) have excellent prognosis and do not require adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients with microsatellite-stable disease, a validated recurrence score based on gene expression provides greater prognostic information than conventional clinicopathological features alone and can be used to inform discussion on the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Midgley
- Oxford Cancer Centre and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McGregor MJ, Fadhil W, Wharton R, Yanagisawa Y, Presz M, Pritchard A, Womack C, Dutton S, Kerr RS, Kerr DJ, Johnstone EC, Ilyas M. Aberrant P53 expression lacks prognostic or predictive significance in colorectal cancer: results from the VICTOR trial. Anticancer Res 2015; 35:1641-5. [PMID: 25750322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
AIM Biomarkers with prognostic and predictive value can help stratify patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) into appropriate treatment groups. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of P53 protein expression as a biomarker in VICTOR, a large phase III trial of rofecoxib in stage II and III CRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Tissue micro arrays were constructed from 884 tumors and the expression of P53 was examined by immunohistochemistry. Tumors were dichotomised as either P53-positive (nuclear expression in >10% of cells or the 'absent' pattern, both representing TP53 mutation) or P53-negative (nuclear expression in <10% of cells). RESULTS Aberrant P53 expression was found in 65% (482/740) of patients. It was associated with distal location (p<0.001) and stage III disease (p<0.001). No effect was observed on disease-free or overall survival, and there was no interaction with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Analysis of P53 expression in the patients recruited to the VICTOR trial confirmed that P53 expression is associated with site and stage of CRC. However, independently, this biomarker has neither prognostic nor predictive utility in this cohort of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan J McGregor
- Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Wakkas Fadhil
- Queen's Medical Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K
| | - Rose Wharton
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Yoko Yanagisawa
- Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Michael Presz
- Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Alison Pritchard
- AstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Mereside, Macclesfield, Cheshire, U.K
| | - Chris Womack
- AstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Mereside, Macclesfield, Cheshire, U.K
| | - Susan Dutton
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Rachel S Kerr
- Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Elaine C Johnstone
- Department of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K
| | - Mohammad Ilyas
- Queen's Medical Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hamdollah Zadeh MA, Amin EM, Hoareau-Aveilla C, Domingo E, Symonds KE, Ye X, Heesom KJ, Salmon A, D'Silva O, Betteridge KB, Williams AC, Kerr DJ, Salmon AHJ, Oltean S, Midgley RS, Ladomery MR, Harper SJ, Varey AHR, Bates DO. Alternative splicing of TIA-1 in human colon cancer regulates VEGF isoform expression, angiogenesis, tumour growth and bevacizumab resistance. Mol Oncol 2015; 9:167-78. [PMID: 25224594 PMCID: PMC4286123 DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Revised: 07/23/2014] [Accepted: 07/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The angiogenic capability of colorectal carcinomas (CRC), and their susceptibility to anti-angiogenic therapy, is determined by expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) isoforms. The intracellular protein T-cell Intracellular Antigen (TIA-1) alters post-transcriptional RNA processing and binds VEGF-A mRNA. We therefore tested the hypothesis that TIA-1 could regulate VEGF-A isoform expression in colorectal cancers. TIA-1 and VEGF-A isoform expression was measured in colorectal cancers and cell lines. We discovered that an endogenous splice variant of TIA-1 encoding a truncated protein, short TIA-1 (sTIA-1) was expressed in CRC tissues and invasive K-Ras mutant colon cancer cells and tissues but not in adenoma cell lines. sTIA-1 was more highly expressed in CRC than in normal tissues and increased with tumour stage. Knockdown of sTIA-1 or over-expression of full length TIA-1 (flTIA-1) induced expression of the anti-angiogenic VEGF isoform VEGF-A165b. Whereas flTIA-1 selectively bound VEGF-A165 mRNA and increased translation of VEGF-A165b, sTIA-1 prevented this binding. In nude mice, xenografted colon cancer cells over-expressing flTIA-1 formed smaller, less vascular tumours than those expressing sTIA-1, but flTIA-1 expression inhibited the effect of anti-VEGF antibodies. These results indicate that alternative splicing of an RNA binding protein can regulate isoform specific expression of VEGF providing an added layer of complexity to the angiogenic profile of colorectal cancer and their resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam A Hamdollah Zadeh
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Elianna M Amin
- Centre for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - Coralie Hoareau-Aveilla
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Enric Domingo
- Molecular and Population Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Kirsty E Symonds
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Xi Ye
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Katherine J Heesom
- Proteomics Facility, Faculty of Veterinary and Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK
| | - Andrew Salmon
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Olivia D'Silva
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Kai B Betteridge
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Ann C Williams
- School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Nuffield Dept Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew H J Salmon
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Sebastian Oltean
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Rachel S Midgley
- Molecular and Population Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Michael R Ladomery
- Centre for Research in Biomedicine, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK
| | - Steven J Harper
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK
| | - David O Bates
- Microvascular Research Laboratories, Veterinary Sciences Building, School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EJ, UK; Cancer Biology, Division of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, NG7 2UH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
The cancer community is deeply concerned about the unintended consequences of the current wording of the European Union (EU) draft Regulation on Data Protection, which may challenge the survival of retrospective clinical research, biobanking, and population-based cancer registries in the EU. This directive could negatively affect Europe's competitiveness in cancer research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Kerr
- Department of Medicine, Nuffield Division of Clinical and Laboratory Sciences, Level 4, Academic Block, John Radcliffe Infirmary, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Abstract
Three years ago, the Lancet's frontispiece stated "Health is now the most important foreign policy issue of our time" and last year, the Director-General of WHO, Margaret Chan, in her opening address, to the Executive Board at its 132nd Session said "health diplomacy works". The nascent field of health diplomacy provides a political framework which aims to deliver the dual goals of improved health in target populations and enhanced governmental relations between collaborating countries. Any government that offered tangible health improvement as a component of aid to a nation with whom they wished to develop stronger diplomatic links would have an advantage in developing a deeper relationship with its citizens.Here we suggest several different mechanisms through which such links could be developed or enhanced, including: provision of relevant health solutions, applied research, cultural alignment and the development of collaborative networks. The Islamic tradition promotes the practice of medicine as a service to humanity. Physical and spiritual wellbeing are intimately related in popular Muslim consciousness. Thoughtful Health Diplomacy therefore has the potential to bridge the perceived divides between Western and predominantly Muslim nations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrunisha Suleman
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Renfro LA, Grothey A, Kerr DJ, Haller DG, Andre T, Van Cutsem E, Saltz L, Labianca R, Loprinzi CL, Alberts SR, Schmoll HJ, Twelves C, Yothers G, Sargent DJ. Survival following stage II/III colon cancer (CC): Accent-based comparison versus matched general population (MGP). J Clin Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.3601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Daniel G. Haller
- Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Leonard Saltz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Roberto Labianca
- Oncology Department, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Chris Twelves
- University of Leeds and St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Greg Yothers
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Biostatistical Center, and University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Adewole I, Martin DN, Williams MJ, Adebamowo C, Bhatia K, Berling C, Casper C, Elshamy K, Elzawawy A, Lawlor RT, Legood R, Mbulaiteye SM, Odedina FT, Olopade OI, Olopade CO, Parkin DM, Rebbeck TR, Ross H, Santini LA, Torode J, Trimble EL, Wild CP, Young AM, Kerr DJ. Building capacity for sustainable research programmes for cancer in Africa. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2014; 11:251-9. [PMID: 24614139 PMCID: PMC4403794 DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Cancer research in Africa will have a pivotal role in cancer control planning in this continent. However, environments (such as those in academic or clinical settings) with limited research infrastructure (laboratories, biorespositories, databases) coupled with inadequate funding and other resources have hampered African scientists from carrying out rigorous research. In September 2012, over 100 scientists with expertise in cancer research in Africa met in London to discuss the challenges in performing high-quality research, and to formulate the next steps for building sustainable, comprehensive and multi-disciplinary programmes relevant to Africa. This was the first meeting among five major organizations: the African Organisation for Research and Training in Africa (AORTIC), the Africa Oxford Cancer Foundation (AfrOx), and the National Cancer Institutes (NCI) of Brazil, France and the USA. This article summarizes the discussions and recommendations of this meeting, including the next steps required to create sustainable and impactful research programmes that will enable evidenced-based cancer control approaches and planning at the local, regional and national levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Adewole
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obsterics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, PMB 5017, GPO, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Rosa Legood
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Julie Torode
- Union for International Cancer Control, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
While most of the attention and spending in the oncology community in the United States has been focused on the remarkable scientific inventions of the newer targeted drugs, the shortage of the older essential cancer drugs that are off patent, mostly generics and injectables, has a threatening impact on the health of cancer patients, the execution of clinical trials and the identification of newer drugs and thus impacts upon the burden of costs and pressures on the health system in the United States. It is a part of the problem of the scarcity of generics across all medical specialties, but its oncology is particularly vulnerable. The problem in The United States has been increasing since the beginning of the 21st century until the 2011; since then there has been some improvement in 2012 and the first two quarters of 2013. In the second quarter of 2012, there were 211 active shortages, down from 246 reports of active shortages in the same quarter of 2011. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials ascribe the improvement to efforts that the agency made after President Obama issued an executive order in 2012 that impel the FDA to obtain early reports from companies about potential shortages. The drivers of the shortages are multi-factorial. But are largely economic and are due to the lack of incentives to produce generics. There are efforts from the US government, politicians and the medical, pharmacy and oncology communities. However, the problem is still serious. There is a general agreement that efforts so far have not been adequate, and that there is a need for addressing effectively the fundamentals and the underlying causes. There is a lot that could be done in the United States and across the world to improve the accessibility of economically sustainable better value cancer drugs regardless of whether they are brand or generics and aiming at a win-win outcome for all stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Elzawawy
- Clinical Oncology Department, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Domingo E, Church DN, Sieber O, Ramamoorthy R, Yanagisawa Y, Johnstone E, Davidson B, Kerr DJ, Tomlinson IPM, Midgley R. Evaluation of PIK3CA mutation as a predictor of benefit from nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:4297-305. [PMID: 24062397 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.50.0322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 156] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) protect against colorectal cancer (CRC) and are associated with reduced disease recurrence and improved outcome after primary treatment. However, toxicities of NSAIDs have limited their use as antineoplastic therapy. Recent data have suggested that the benefit of aspirin after CRC diagnosis is limited to patients with PIK3CA-mutant cancers. We sought to determine the predictive utility of PIK3CA mutation for benefit from both cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition and aspirin. METHODS We performed molecular analysis of tumors from 896 participants in the Vioxx in Colorectal Cancer Therapy: Definition of Optimal Regime (VICTOR) trial, a large randomized trial comparing rofecoxib with placebo after primary CRC resection. We compared relapse-free survival and overall survival between rofecoxib therapy and placebo and between the use and nonuse of low-dose aspirin, according to tumor PIK3CA mutation status. RESULTS We found no evidence of a greater benefit from rofecoxib treatment compared with placebo in patients whose tumors had PIK3CA mutations (multivariate adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.2; 95% CI, 0.53 to 2.72; P = .66; (P)INTERACTION = .47) compared with patients with PIK3CA wild-type cancers (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.16; P = .34). In contrast, regular aspirin use after CRC diagnosis was associated with a reduced rate of CRC recurrence in patients with PIK3CA-mutant cancers (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.832; P = .027; (P)INTERACTION = .024) but not in patients lacking tumor PIK3CA mutation (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.42; P = .71). CONCLUSION Although tumor PIK3CA mutation does not predict benefit from rofecoxib treatment, it merits further evaluation as a predictive biomarker for aspirin therapy. Our findings are concordant with recent data and support the prospective investigation of adjuvant aspirin in PIK3CA-mutant CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enric Domingo
- Enric Domingo, David N. Church, Rajarajan Ramamoorthy, and Ian P.M. Tomlinson, The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford; David N. Church, David J. Kerr, and Rachel Midgley, Oxford Cancer Centre, Churchill Hospital; Yoko Yanagisawa, Elaine Johnstone, David J. Kerr, and Rachel Midgley, University of Oxford, Oxford; Rajarajan Ramamoorthy and Brian Davidson, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and Oliver Sieber, Ludwig Colon Cancer Initiative Laboratory, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
|
46
|
Palles C, Cazier JB, Howarth KM, Domingo E, Jones AM, Broderick P, Kemp Z, Spain SL, Guarino E, Salguero I, Sherborne A, Chubb D, Carvajal-Carmona LG, Ma Y, Kaur K, Dobbins S, Barclay E, Gorman M, Martin L, Kovac MB, Humphray S, Lucassen A, Holmes CC, Bentley D, Donnelly P, Taylor J, Petridis C, Roylance R, Sawyer EJ, Kerr DJ, Clark S, Grimes J, Kearsey SE, Thomas HJW, McVean G, Houlston RS, Tomlinson I. Erratum: Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Nat Genet 2013. [DOI: 10.1038/ng0613-713b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
47
|
|
48
|
Hamdollah-Zadeh M, Ye X, Domingo E, Kerr DJ, Ladomery MR, Harpar SJ, Bates DO. Abstract 3200: Spliced variant of T-cell intercellular antigen 1 (TIA-1) in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-3200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Alternative splicing regulates many cancer-associated genes. Splice isoforms that are found in tumors could have diagnostic value and may provide potential drug targets. We identified an endogenous splice variant of TIA-1 (T-cell intercellular antigen-1), short TIA-1 (shTIA-1), expressed in invasive colon cancer cells, which was not expressed in non-invasive adenoma cell lines. In this study we investigated the frequency of shTIA-1 expression in human normal and cancer tissue and if it correlates with advanced-stage of colon cancer.
RNA was extracted from 25μm thick scrolls of formalin fixed paraffin embedded sections of 40 colorectal carcinoma (20 Duke's, 20 Duke's C stage) and normal samples. RT-PCR was carried out to detect full length (flTIA-1) and shTIA-1. Immunohistochemical CD31 staining of microvessels in the same samples was used to assess microvessel density (MVD) and correlate the shTIA isoform expression and stages of the tumors. The results showed that flTIA-1 was less frequently found in tumour than in normal tissues (p=0.002). shTIA-1 was more highly expressed than flTIA-1 and in significantly higher portion of tumors than normal samples (p=0.0106). There was a significantly lower proportion of Duke's B than Duke's C grade tumours with detectable shTIA-1 expression (p=0.018). CD31 staining showed samples with shTIA-1 associated with increased MVD. We did not find any association between stages and MVD, as there was no statistically significant difference in MVD between Duke's B and Duke's C. However tumours had higher MVD than normal tissues from the same patients. These results indicate that a splice variant of TIA-1 is expressed in human colorectal carcinoma and is associated with increased angiogenesis.
Citation Format: Maryam Hamdollah-Zadeh, Xi Ye, Enric Domingo, David J. Kerr, Mike R. Ladomery, Steve J. Harpar, Dave O. Bates. Spliced variant of T-cell intercellular antigen 1 (TIA-1) in colorectal cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3200. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-3200
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xi Ye
- 1University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Palles C, Cazier JB, Howarth KM, Domingo E, Jones AM, Broderick P, Kemp Z, Spain SL, Almeida EG, Salguero I, Sherborne A, Chubb D, Carvajal-Carmona LG, Ma Y, Kaur K, Dobbins S, Barclay E, Gorman M, Martin L, Kovac MB, Humphray S, Lucassen A, Holmes C, Bentley D, Donnelly P, Taylor J, Petridis C, Roylance R, Sawyer EJ, Kerr DJ, Clark S, Grimes J, Kearsey SE, Thomas HJW, McVean G, Houlston RS, Tomlinson I. Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Nat Genet 2013; 45:136-44. [PMID: 23263490 PMCID: PMC3785128 DOI: 10.1038/ng.2503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 714] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2012] [Accepted: 11/28/2012] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Many individuals with multiple or large colorectal adenomas or early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) have no detectable germline mutations in the known cancer predisposition genes. Using whole-genome sequencing, supplemented by linkage and association analysis, we identified specific heterozygous POLE or POLD1 germline variants in several multiple-adenoma and/or CRC cases but in no controls. The variants associated with susceptibility, POLE p.Leu424Val and POLD1 p.Ser478Asn, have high penetrance, and POLD1 mutation was also associated with endometrial cancer predisposition. The mutations map to equivalent sites in the proofreading (exonuclease) domain of DNA polymerases ɛ and δ and are predicted to cause a defect in the correction of mispaired bases inserted during DNA replication. In agreement with this prediction, the tumors from mutation carriers were microsatellite stable but tended to acquire base substitution mutations, as confirmed by yeast functional assays. Further analysis of published data showed that the recently described group of hypermutant, microsatellite-stable CRCs is likely to be caused by somatic POLE mutations affecting the exonuclease domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Palles
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Jean-Baptiste Cazier
- Bioinformatics and Statistical Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Kimberley M Howarth
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Enric Domingo
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Angela M. Jones
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Peter Broderick
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Brookes-Lawley Building, Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Zoe Kemp
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Sarah L Spain
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Estrella Guarino Almeida
- Dept. of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
| | - Israel Salguero
- Dept. of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
| | - Amy Sherborne
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Brookes-Lawley Building, Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Daniel Chubb
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Brookes-Lawley Building, Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Luis G Carvajal-Carmona
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Yusanne Ma
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Brookes-Lawley Building, Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Kulvinder Kaur
- Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Sara Dobbins
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Brookes-Lawley Building, Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ella Barclay
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Maggie Gorman
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Lynn Martin
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Michal B Kovac
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
- Research Group Human Genetics, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Mattenstrasse 28, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sean Humphray
- Illumina Cambridge Ltd., Chesterford Research Park, Little Chesterford, Essex CB10 1XL, UK
| | | | | | - Anneke Lucassen
- Wessex Regional Genetics, Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton SO16 5YA UK
| | - Christopher Holmes
- Bioinformatics and Statistical Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK
| | - David Bentley
- Illumina Cambridge Ltd., Chesterford Research Park, Little Chesterford, Essex CB10 1XL, UK
| | - Peter Donnelly
- Bioinformatics and Statistical Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
- Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK
| | - Jenny Taylor
- Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Christos Petridis
- Guy’s, King’s, St Thomas’ Cancer Centre, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Rebecca Roylance
- Institute of Cancer, Bart’s and the London Medical School, Queen Mary College, University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - Elinor J Sawyer
- Guy’s, King’s, St Thomas’ Cancer Centre, Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - David J. Kerr
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DU, UK
| | - Susan Clark
- Polyposis Registry, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mark’s Hospital Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - Jonathan Grimes
- Division of Structural Biology, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
- Science Division, Diamond Light Source Ltd., Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen E Kearsey
- Dept. of Zoology, University of Oxford, The Tinbergen Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
| | - Huw JW Thomas
- Family Cancer Clinic, Imperial College School of Medicine, St Mark’s Hospital Watford Road, Harrow, HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - Gilean McVean
- Bioinformatics and Statistical Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Richard S Houlston
- Section of Cancer Genetics, Brookes-Lawley Building, Institute of Cancer Research, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
- Oxford NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Huijbers A, Tollenaar RAEM, v Pelt GW, Zeestraten ECM, Dutton S, McConkey CC, Domingo E, Smit VTHBM, Midgley R, Warren BF, Johnstone EC, Kerr DJ, Mesker WE. The proportion of tumor-stroma as a strong prognosticator for stage II and III colon cancer patients: validation in the VICTOR trial. Ann Oncol 2012; 24:179-85. [PMID: 22865778 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intra-tumor stroma percentage in colon cancer (CC) patients has previously been reported by our group as a strong independent prognostic parameter. Patients with a high stroma percentage within the primary tumor have a poor prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS Tissue samples from the most invasive part of the primary tumor of 710 patients (52% Stage II, 48% Stage III) participating in the VICTOR trial were analyzed for their tumor-stroma percentage. Stroma-high (>50%) and stroma-low (≤50%) groups were evaluated with respect to survival times. RESULTS Overall and disease-free survival times (OS and DFS) were significantly lower in the stroma-high group (OS P<0.0001, hazard ratio (HR)=1.96; DFS P<0.0001, HR=2.15). The 5-year OS was 69.0% versus 83.4% and DFS 58.6% versus 77.3% for stroma-high versus stroma-low patients. CONCLUSION This study confirms the intra-tumor stroma ratio as a prognostic factor. This parameter could be a valuable and low cost addition to the TNM status and next to current high-risk parameters such as microsatellite instability status used in routine pathology reporting. When adding the stroma-parameter to the ASCO criteria, the rate of 'undertreated' patients dropped from 5.9% to 4.3%, the 'overtreated' increased with 6.8% but the correctly classified increased with an additional 14%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Huijbers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|