Effects of intrathecally injected histamine receptor antagonists on the antinociception induced by morphine, beta-endorphin, and U50, 488H administered intrathecally in the mouse

Interaction of histamine and calcitonin gene-related peptide in the formalin induced pain perception in rats

Histamine and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) contribute to the pain perception. The aim of the present study is to clarify the interaction of histamine and CGRP in the perception of inflammatory pain. The effects of a histamine H1 receptor antagonist (pyrilamine, i.p.), an H2 receptor antagonist (ranitidine, i.p.) and a CGRP antagonist (CGRP 8-37, i.t.) on the formalininduced pain was studied in rats. Pyrilamine and ranitidine produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive response in the first and the second phases of the formalin test. A single administration of pyrilamine (1 mg/kg, i.p.), ranitidine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or CGRP 8-37 (10 µg/µL, i.t.) had no significant effects on the pain perception in the second phase. A combination of CGRP 8-37 and pyrilamine or ranitidine at these sub-effective doses, however, showed nociceptive response in the second phase. Moreover, a histamine (i.t.)-induced hyperalgesia was completely prevented by treatment with GGRP 8-37 at this dose. Our findings have raised the possibility that the CGRP system has interaction with histamine in the perception of inflammatory pain.

Interaction between histamine and morphine at the level of the hippocampus in the formalin-induced orofacial pain in rats

The present study explored the interaction between histaminergic and opioidergic systems at the level of the hippocampus in modulation of orofacial pain by intra-hippocampal microinjections of histamine, pyrilamine (an antagonist of histamine H(1) receptors), ranitidine (an antagonist of histamine H(2) receptors), morphine (an opioid receptor agonist) and naloxone (an opioid receptor antagonist) in separate and combined treatments. Orofacial pain was induced by subcutaneous (sc) injection of formalin (50 μl, 1%) in the upper lip region and the time spent face rubbing was recorded in 3 min blocks for 45 min. Formalin (sc) produced a marked biphasic (first phase: 0-3 min, second phase: 15-33 min) pain response. Histamine and morphine suppressed both phases of pain. Histamine increased morphine-induced antinociception. Pyrilamine and ranitidine had no effects when used alone, whereas pretreatments with pyrilamine and ranitidine prevented histamine- and morphine-induced antinociceptive effects. Naloxone alone non-significantly increased pain intensity and inhibited the antinociceptive effects of morphine and histamine. The results of the present study indicate that at the level of the hippocampus, histamine through its H(1) and H(2) receptors, mediates orofacial region pain. Moreover, morphine via a naloxone-reversible mechanism produces analgesia. In addition, both histamine H(1) and H(2) receptors, as well as opioid receptors may be involved in the interaction between histamine and morphine in producing analgesia.

Modification of formalin-induced nociception by different histamine receptor agonists and antagonists

The present study evaluated the effects of different histamine receptor agonists and antagonists on the nociceptive response in the mouse formalin test. Intracerebroventricular (20-40 microg/mouse i.c.v.) or subcutaneous (1-10 mg/kg s.c.) injection of HTMT (H(1) receptor agonist) elicited a dose-related hyperalgesia in the early and late phases. Conversely, intraperitoneal (20 and 30 mg/kg i.p.) injection of dexchlorpheniramine (H(1) receptor antagonist) was antinociceptive in both phases. At a dose ineffective per se, dexchlorpheniramine (10 mg/kg i.p.) antagonized the hyperalgesia induced by HTMT (40 mug/mouse i.c.v. or 10 mg/kg s.c.). Dimaprit (H(2) receptor agonist, 30 mg/kg i.p.) and ranitidine (H(2) receptor antagonist, 20 and 40 mg/kg i.p.) reduced the nociceptive responses in the early and late phases. No significant change in the antinociceptive activity was found following the combination of dimaprit (30 mg/kg i.p.) with ranitidine (10 mg/kg i.p.). The antinociceptive effect of dimaprit (30 mg/kg i.p.) was prevented by naloxone (5 mg/kg i.p.) in the early phase or by imetit (H(3) receptor agonist, 25 mg/kg i.p.) in both early and late phases. The histamine H(3) receptor agonist imetit was hyperalgesic following i.p. administration of 50 mg/kg. Imetit-induced hyperalgesia was completely prevented by treatment with a dose ineffective per se of thioperamide (H(3) receptor antagonist, 5 mg/kg i.p.). The results suggest that histamine H(1) and H(3) receptor activations increase sensitivity to nociceptive stimulus in the formalin test.

ReN-1869 [(R)-1-(3-(10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene)-1-propyl)-3-piperidine carboxylic acid], a novel histamine H1 receptor antagonist, produces potent and selective antinociceptive effects on dorsal horn neurons after inflammation and neuropathy

We characterized the effect of a novel selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist, (R)-1-(3-(10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo [a,d] cyclohepten-5-ylidene)-1-propyl)-3-piperidine carboxylic acid (ReN-1869), on the responses of dorsal horn neurons in anesthetized rats after carrageenan induced-inflammation and peripheral neuropathy (L5/6 spinal nerve ligation; SNL). ReN-1869 was administered systemically (0.1-4 mg/kg), and drug effects were assessed using a wide range of peripheral electrical and natural stimuli (brush, von Frey filaments, and heat). Comparisons were made between unoperated naive groups and either carrageenan inflamed or SNL rats. ReN-1869 produced little effect on the electrically evoked responses (wind-up, Abeta-, Adelta-, and C-fiber-evoked responses); however, it significantly attenuated neuronal responses to noxious heat in carrageenan and SNL rats. A robust effect was seen with the low-threshold mechanical punctate (von Frey 9 g) stimuli, which were selectively inhibited by ReN-1869 after tissue and nerve injury. These inhibitory actions were in marked contrast to the naive animal group, where only nonsignificant effects were observed. To investigate whether the actions of ReN-1869 are mediated via the antagonism of histamine H1 receptors, the effects of this novel compound were compared with that of another H1 receptor antagonist, mepyramine (1-20 mg/kg). Systemic mepyramine produced strong inhibitions of the 9-g von Frey-evoked responses in carrageenan and SNL rats. The similar pharmacological profile of these two compounds suggests for a similar mechanism of action. We propose that ReN-1869 may represent a novel agent for the treatment of certain modalities of persistent pain states, in particular for the treatment of mechanical allodynia.

Roles of histamine receptors in pain perception: A study using receptors gene knockout mice

To study the participation of histamine H1- and H2-receptors in pain perception, H1 and H2 receptor knockout (KO) mice were examined for pain threshold by means of three kinds of nociceptive tasks. These included assays for thermal, mechanical, and chemical nociception. H1KO mice showed significantly fewer nociceptive responses to the hot-plate, tail-flick, tail-pressure, paw-withdrawal, formalin, capsaicin, and abdominal constriction tests. Sensitivity to noxious stimuli in H1KO mice was significantly decreased when compared to wild-type mice. The antinociceptive phenotypes of H2KO were relatively less prominent when compared to H1KO mice. We also examined the antinociceptive effects of intrathecally-, intracerebroventricularly-, and subcutaneously-administered morphine in H1KO and H2KO mice. In these nociceptive assays, the antinociceptive effects produced by morphine were more enhanced in both H1KO and H2KO mice. The effects of histamine H1- and H2-receptor antagonists on morphine-induced antinociception were studied in ICR mice. The intrathecal, intracerebroventricular and subcutaneous co-administrations of d-chlorpheniramine enhanced the effects of morphine in all nociceptive assays examined. In addition, intrathecal co-administrations of cimetidine enhanced the antinociception of morphine in the hot plate tests. These results suggest that existing H1 and H2 receptors play an inhibitory role in morphine-induced antinociception in the spinal and supra-spinal levels.

Dynorphin-independent spinal cannabinoid antinociception

Spinal antinociception produced by delta 9-tetrahydro-cannabinol (Delta(9)-THC) and other cannabinoid agonists has been suggested to be mediated by the release of dynorphin acting at the kappa opioid receptor. Alternatively, as cannabinoid receptors are distributed appropriately in the pain transmission pathway, cannabinoid agonists might act directly at the spinal level to inhibit nociception, without requiring dynorphin release. Here, these possibilities were explored using mice with a deletion of the gene encoding prodynorphin. Antinociceptive dose-response curves were constructed for spinal Delta(9)-THC and WIN 55,212-2 in prodynorphin knock-out mice and in wild-type littermates. WIN 55,212-2 and Delta(9)-THC were equipotent in the wild-type and prodynorphin knock-out mice. Spinal pretreatment with a kappa opioid receptor antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), did not alter the dose-response curves for either WIN 55,212-2 or Delta(9)-THC in prodynorphin knock-out and wild-type mice. However, the same dose of nor-BNI used blocked U50,488H-induced antinociception in both wild-type and prodynorphin knock-out mice, confirming kappa opioid receptor activity. Pretreatment with SR141716A, a cannabinoid receptor antagonist blocked the antinociceptive actions of both WIN 55,212-2 and Delta(9)-THC. These data support the conclusion that antinociception produced by spinal cannabinoids are likely to be mediated directly through activation of cannabinoid receptors without the requirement for dynorphin release or activation of kappa opioid receptors.

Enhanced antinociception by intrathecally-administered morphine in histamine H1 receptor gene knockout mice

We previously reported that histamine H(1) receptor gene knockout mice (H1KO) showed lower spontaneous nociceptive threshold to pain stimuli when compared to wild-type mice. The objective of the present study was to examine the antinociceptive effect of intrathecally-administered morphine in H1KO mice. The antinociceptive effects of morphine were examined using assays for thermal (tail-flick, hot-plate, paw-withdrawal), mechanical (tail-pressure) and chemical nociception (formalin and capsaicin tests) using H1KO and wild-type mice. In these nociceptive assays, intrathecally-administered morphine produced significant antinociceptive effects in wild-type mice. The antinociceptive effect produced by intrathecally administered morphine was enhanced in the knockout mice. We also examined the effect of an histamine H(1) receptor antagonist, an active (d-) isomer of chlorpheniramine, on morphine-induced antinociception in ICR mice. The intrathecal co-administration of d-chlorpheniramine enhanced the effect of morphine in all nociceptive assays examined. The pharmacological experiments using d-chlorpheniramine further substantiate the evidence for the histamine H(1) receptor-mediated suppression of morphine-induced antinociception. These results suggest that existing H(1) receptors play an inhibitory role in morphine-induced antinociception at the spinal cord level.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

The physiology of brain histamine

Histamine-releasing neurons are located exclusively in the TM of the hypothalamus, from where they project to practically all brain regions, with ventral areas (hypothalamus, basal forebrain, amygdala) receiving a particularly strong innervation. The intrinsic electrophysiological properties of TM neurons (slow spontaneous firing, broad action potentials, deep after hyperpolarisations, etc.) are extremely similar to other aminergic neurons. Their firing rate varies across the sleep-wake cycle, being highest during waking and lowest during rapid-eye movement sleep. In contrast to other aminergic neurons somatodendritic autoreceptors (H3) do not activate an inwardly rectifying potassium channel but instead control firing by inhibiting voltage-dependent calcium channels. Histamine release is enhanced under extreme conditions such as dehydration or hypoglycemia or by a variety of stressors. Histamine activates four types of receptors. H1 receptors are mainly postsynaptically located and are coupled positively to phospholipase C. High densities are found especially in the hypothalamus and other limbic regions. Activation of these receptors causes large depolarisations via blockade of a leak potassium conductance, activation of a non-specific cation channel or activation of a sodium-calcium exchanger. H2 receptors are also mainly postsynaptically located and are coupled positively to adenylyl cyclase. High densities are found in hippocampus, amygdala and basal ganglia. Activation of these receptors also leads to mainly excitatory effects through blockade of calcium-dependent potassium channels and modulation of the hyperpolarisation-activated cation channel. H3 receptors are exclusively presynaptically located and are negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase. High densities are found in the basal ganglia. These receptors mediated presynaptic inhibition of histamine release and the release of other neurotransmitters, most likely via inhibition of presynaptic calcium channels. Finally, histamine modulates the glutamate NMDA receptor via an action at the polyamine binding site. The central histamine system is involved in many central nervous system functions: arousal; anxiety; activation of the sympathetic nervous system; the stress-related release of hormones from the pituitary and of central aminergic neurotransmitters; antinociception; water retention and suppression of eating. A role for the neuronal histamine system as a danger response system is proposed.

Antihistamines as analgesics

Histamine activates pain-transmitting nerve fibres, releases pain-related neuropeptides, and is painful when injected into the skin. Histamine agonists mimic these effects, suggesting that histamine plays a role in mediating the signal transduction of tissue damage or other painful stimulus. Certain 'antihistamines' (histamine H1 receptor antagonists) and other antihistaminics are 'analgesic' in preclinical or clinical models. Potential sites of action of these agents include the brain and spinal cord and a specific histamine receptor subtype might be involved (three subtypes have been identified). However, it is possible that other mechanisms account for the analgesic effect.

Involvement of dynorphin in immobilization stress-induced antinociception in the mouse

The effect of antiserum against [Met(5)]-enkephalin, [Leu(5)]-enkephalin, beta-endorphin, or dynorphin A-(1-13) administered intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) or intrathecally (i. t.) on immobilization-induced antinociception was studied in ICR mice. Antinociception was assessed by the tail-flick assay. Immobilization of the mouse increased inhibition of the tail-flick response at least 1 h. The i.c.v. or i.t. injection with antiserum against dynorphin A-(1-13) at the dose of 200 microg significantly attenuated immobilization-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. However, antiserum against [Met(5)]-enkephalin, [Leu(5)]-enkephalin, or beta-endorphin did not affect the immobilization stress-induced antinociception. Furthermore, i.c.v. or i.t. injection with nor-binaltorphimine (Nor-BNI; from 1 to 20 microg) effectively inhibited immobilization stress-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response in a dose-dependent manner. However, beta-FNA (from 0.5 to 2 microg) or naltrindole (from 1 to 20 microg) administered i.c.v. or i.t. did not affect immobilization stress-induced antinociception. Our results suggest that supraspinally and spinally located dynorphin appears to be involved in the production of immobilization stress-induced antinociception via stimulating kappa-opioid receptors.

Mast cell degranulation induces delayed rectal allodynia in rats: role of histamine and 5-HT

Visceral hypersensitivity is a common feature of functional bowel disorders, where an increased number of mast cells have often been described. Thus, we investigated the effect of an experimental mast cell degranulation induced by BrX-537A on somatic (tail heating) and visceral (rectal distension) sensitivity in rats and the involvement of histamine and/or serotonin on this last response. After BrX-537A administration, the latency of tail withdrawal reflex was shortened within the 2- to 8-hr period. Moreover, BrX-537A reduced the distension volume threshold from 0.8 ml to 0.4 ml inducing allodynia, from 6 to 12 hr after its administration. This effect was suppressed by doxantrazole (mast cell stabilizing agent) and WAY 100635 (5-HT1A receptor antagonist), and reproduced by 5-HTP (5-HT precursor) and 8-OH-DPAT (5-HT1A receptor agonist). However, neither granisetron (5-HT3 receptor antagonist) nor H1, H2, or H3 histamine receptor antagonists modified the BrX-537A-induced allodynia. Consequently, mast cell degranulation initiates a delayed somatic and visceral allodynia, with the participation of serotonin, through 5-HT1A receptor activation, on the visceral response.