Safety and efficacy of splenic irradiation in the treatment of patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis: a report on 15 patients

Splenomegaly in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who are candidates for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a Position Paper on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Splenomegaly is a hallmark of myelofibrosis, a debilitating haematological malignancy for which the only curative option is allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Considerable splenic enlargement might be associated with a higher risk of delayed engraftment and graft failure, increased non-relapse mortality, and worse overall survival after HCT as compared with patients without significantly enlarged splenomegaly. Currently, there are no standardised guidelines to assist transplantation physicians in deciding optimal management of splenomegaly before HCT. Therefore, the aim of this Position Paper is to offer a shared position statement on this issue. An international group of haematologists, transplantation physicians, gastroenterologists, surgeons, radiotherapists, and radiologists with experience in the treatment of myelofibrosis contributed to this Position Paper. The key issues addressed by this group included the assessment, prevalence, and clinical significance of splenomegaly, and the need for a therapeutic intervention before HCT for the control of splenomegaly. Specific scenarios, including splanchnic vein thrombosis and COVID-19, are also discussed. All patients with myelofibrosis must have their spleen size assessed before allogeneic HCT. Myelofibrosis patients with splenomegaly measuring 5 cm and larger, particularly when exceeding 15 cm below the left costal margin, or with splenomegaly-related symptoms, could benefit from treatment with the aim of reducing the spleen size before HCT. In the absence of, or loss of, response, patients with increasing spleen size should be evaluated for second-line options, depending on availability, patient fitness, and centre experience. Splanchnic vein thrombosis is not an absolute contraindication for HCT, but a multidisciplinary approach is warranted. Finally, prevention and treatment of COVID-19 should adhere to standard recommendations for immunocompromised patients.

Allogeneic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myelofibrosis: 2021

The aim of this review is to update the current status of allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) for patients with myelofibrosis (MF). We have first summarized the issue of an indication for allogeneic HSCT, discussing several prognostic scoring systems, developed to predict the outcome of MF, and therefore to identify patients who will benefit of an allogeneic HSCT. Patients with low risk MF are usually not selected for a transplant, whereas patients with intermediate or high risk MF are eligible. A separate issue, is how to predict the outcome of HSCT: we will outline a clinical molecular myelofibrosis transplant scoring system (MTSS), which predicts overall survival, ranging from 90% for low risk patients, to 20% for very high risk patients. We will also discuss transfusion burden and spleen size, as predictors of transplant outcome. The choice of a transplant platform including the conditioning regimen, the stem cell source and GvHD prophylaxis, are crucial for a successful program in MF, and will be outlined. Complications such as poor graft function, graft failure, GvHD and relapse of the disease, will also be reviewed. Finally we discuss monitoring the disease after HSCT with donor chimerism, driver mutations and hematologic data. We have made an effort to make this review as comprehensive and up to date as possible, and we hope it will provide some useful data for the clinicians.

Somatically acquired mutations in primary myelofibrosis: A case report and meta-analysis

Familial myeloproliferative disease (MPD) cases account for 7.6% of the global MPD cases. The present study reported 2 cases of primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The patients were two sisters; the older sister succumbed to the disease at the age of 37, whereas the younger sister maintained a stable disease status and gave birth to a son through in vitro fertilization. Genetic analysis of bone marrow DNA samples showed that both sisters carried a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation, and the older sister also had a trisomy 8 chromosomal abnormality (47, XX, +8). A systematic literature search was also performed using PubMed, CNKI and Wanfang databases, to determine the association between JAK2 and PMF. Following comprehensive screening of the published literature, 19 studies were found to be eligible for the current meta-analysis. The results showed that JAK2 V617F was a risk factor of PMF, and no sex dimorphism was observed in JAK2 V617F mutation prevalence amongst all PMF cases. In addition, there was a lack of association between the JAK2 V617F mutation and PMF-related mortality.

Splenectomy in Myelofibrosis: Indications, Efficacy, and Complications

Splenomegaly, which may range from a few centimeters below the left costal border to massive dimensions, is one of the most characteristic features in patients with advanced myelofibrosis (MF). Splenectomy may offer an effective therapeutic option for treating massive splenomegaly in patients with MF, and especially in cases of disease refractory to conventional drugs, but it is associated with a number of complications as well as substantial morbidity and mortality. Whether splenectomy should be performed before allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is also controversial, and there is a lack of prospective randomized clinical trials that assess the role of splenectomy before hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in patients with MF. Although splenectomy is not routinely performed before transplantation, it may be appropriate in patients with massive splenomegaly and related symptoms, so long as the higher risk of graft failure in such cases is taken into account. This review aims to describe the efficacy, indications, and complications of splenectomy in patients with MF; and to evaluate the long-term impact of splenectomy on patient survival and risk of disease transformation.

Development of a symptom assessment in patients with myelofibrosis: qualitative study findings

BACKGROUND

The goal of the research reported here was to understand the patient experience of living with myelofibrosis (MF) and establish content validity of the Modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Diary (MPN-SD).

METHODS

Qualitative interviews were performed in patients with MF, including both concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing. Patients with MF were asked to spontaneously report on their signs, symptoms, and impacts of MF, as well as their understanding of the MPN-SD content, and use of the tool on an electronic platform. A supplementary literature review and meetings with MF experts were also performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with MF participated in qualitative interviews. Signs and symptoms most commonly reported by ruxolitinib-experienced patients (n = 16) were: fatigue and/or tiredness (n = 16, 100%), shortness of breath (n = 11, 69%), pain below the ribs on the left side and/or stomach pain and/or abdominal pain (n = 9, 56%), and enlarged spleen (n = 9, 56%) and for ruxolitinib-naïve patients (n = 7) were: fatigue and/or tiredness (n = 6, 86%), pain below the ribs on the left side (n = 6, 86%), enlarged spleen (n = 4, 57%), full quickly/filling up quickly (n = 4, 57%), night sweats and/or general sweats (n = 4, 57%), and itching (n = 4, 57%). Patients demonstrated that they were able to read, understand, and provide meaningful responses to the MPN-SD. The final version of the MPN-SD includes the 10 most commonly reported concepts from the MF patient interviews.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings demonstrate the comprehensiveness of the MPN-SD in assessing MF symptoms in both ruxolitinib-experienced and ruxolitinib-naïve patients, while remaining easy for patients to understand and complete.

Palliative splenic irradiation for symptomatic splenomegaly in non-Hodgkin lymphoma

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma, an uncommon subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), is usually present with symptomatic splenomegaly. Although splenectomy has long been considered the first-line therapy in symptomatic or cytopenic patients, it can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Splenic irradiation is an option for patients who have a poor response to systemic therapy and/or are not surgical candidates. In this paper, we present a case report of a patient who received splenic radiotherapy for symptomatic splenomegaly.

METHODS

An 85-year-old Caucasian man with a 4 year history of low-grade NHL presented with progressive pancytopenia, significant weight loss and symptomatic splenomegaly (abdominal discomfort, sense of fullness and limitation of mobility due to spleen size). The patient refused splenectomy and, in December 2017, was referred to palliative splenic radiotherapy. He was initially treated with five fractions of one Grey (Gy) in order to evaluate clinical and haematology response. After that, 1.5 Gy daily, 5 days a week for 3 weeks. 3D conformal radiotherapy, multiple fields and mixed energy (6 and 15 Mv) were used.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy allowed significant splenic reduction to almost half the size, resolving abdominal discomfort and improving quality of life. There was no decline of haemoglobin, leukocytes and platelet counts; in fact, there was a marginal increase.

CONCLUSION

Palliative splenic irradiation was well tolerated confirming that it is a safe treatment option for palliation of symptomatic splenomegaly. Thereby, splenic irradiation should be strongly considered in the management of symptomatic splenomegaly, for selected patients who are refractory to or unsuitable for other options or when the patient refuses other treatments.

Treatment of symptomatic splenomegaly with low doses of radiotherapy: Retrospective analysis and review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of low doses of radiation therapy for symptomatic splenomegaly in malignant and benign diseases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

5 patients with symptomatic splenomegaly were treated with low doses of radiation in our centre (January 2008-December 2016). 4/5 patients had malignant neoplasia (acute myeloid leukemia, non Hogdkin lymphoma and prolymphocytic B cell leukemia) and splenomegaly was caused by extramedullary hematopoiesis. 1/5 patient had benign disease (HBV liver cirrhosis) and splenomegaly was caused by vascular ectasia. Median age was 73 years (range 61-86 years). There were 4 females and 1 male. These patients had exclusively splenic pain or abdominal discomfort in 20%, exclusively cytopenias 40% and both 40%. Patients needed radiation therapy for symptomatic control. Dose per fraction was 0.5 Gy every two days; total dose initially prescribed 10 Gy. IGRT were performed in all patients to ensure an appropriate position and to adapt the treatment volume to the changes in the spleen volume along the treatment. Median craneocaudal length size of the spleen was more than 26 cm (range 15.2-34.9 cm).

RESULTS

Median radiation doses were 4.85 Gy (range 2.5-10). Median craneocaudal spleen size reduction was 4.6 cm (0-8 cm). Splenic pain and abdominal disturbances improved in all patients. Median increase of haemoglobin and platelets levels was 1.6 mg/dl and 27.950 cells respectively in the first week after the end of radiotherapy.One patient had to interrupt her treatment due to grade II neutropenia. No other toxicities were described. With a median follow-up of 39 months (16-89 months), only one recurrence was described at 24 months and consisted of thrombocytopenia. The patient received a second course of radiotherapy with excellent response.

CONCLUSION

Low doses of radiation therapy for treatment of symptomatic splenomegaly were effective, with a low rate of side effects. Splenic pain and abdominal discomfort completely improved and cytopenias rised to secure levels.

Splenic irradiation for splenomegaly: A systematic review

Splenic irradiation (SI) is a palliative treatment option for symptomatic splenomegaly (i.e. for pain, early satiety, pancytopenia from sequestration) secondary to hematologic malignancies and disorders. The purpose of the current article is to review the literature on SI for hematologic malignancies and disorders, including: (1) patient selection and optimal technique; (2) efficacy of SI; and (3) toxicities of SI. PICOS/PRISMA methods are used to select 27 articles including 766 courses of SI for 486 patients from 1960 to 2016. The most common cancers treated included chronic lymphocytic leukemia and myeloproliferative disorders; the most common regimen was 10Gy in 1Gy fractions over two weeks, and 27% of patients received retreatment. A partial or complete response (for symptoms, lab abnormalities) was obtained in 85-90% of treated patients, and 30% were retreated within 6-12months. There was no correlation between biologically equivalent dose of radiation therapy and response duration, pain relief, spleen reduction, or cytopenia improvement (r2 all <0.4); therefore, lower doses (e.g. 5Gy in 5 fractions) may be as effective as higher doses. Grade 3-4 toxicity (typically leukopenia, infection) was noted in 22% of courses, with grade 5 toxicity in 0.7% of courses. All grade 5 toxicities were due to either thrombocytopenia with hemorrhage or leukopenia with sepsis (or a combination of both); they were sequelae of cancer and not directly caused by SI. In summary, SI is generally a safe and efficacious method for treating patients with symptomatic splenomegaly.

Treatment of Myelofibrosis: A Moving Target

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm that presents either as a primary disease or evolves secondarily from polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia to post-polycythemia vera MF or post-essential thrombocythemia MF, respectively. Myelofibrosis is characterized by stem cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation, abnormal cytokine expression, bone marrow fibrosis, anemia, splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, constitutional symptoms, cachexia, leukemic progression, and shortened survival. Therapeutic options for patients with MF have been limited to the use of cytoreductive agents, predominantly hydroxyurea; splenectomy and splenic irradiation for treatment of splenomegaly; and management of anemia with transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, androgens, and immunomodulatory agents along with steroids. The only curative option is allogeneic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which is associated with high morbidity and mortality risks. Recently, JAK (Janus kinase) inhibitor therapies have become available and proven to be palliative in primary MF patients with hydroxyurea-refractory splenomegaly and severe constitutional symptoms. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical features of MF; discuss different treatment strategies, including ASCT; and discuss the potential danger and benefit of using JAK inhibitors prior to ASCT.

Adaptive splenic radiotherapy for symptomatic splenomegaly management in myeloproliferative disorders

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Symptomatic, massive splenomegaly is a debilitating complication of myeloproliferative disorders. In the study, we evaluated the use of a contemporary, individualized radiotherapeutic approach for splenic irradiation, including 3-dimensional computed tomography-based treatment planning, individualized treatment margins based on splenic motion assessment, online setup verification with volumetric image guidance at each fraction, and adaptive radiation treatment planning to account for changes in splenic size during the fractionated radiotherapy course.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

Between December 2008 and January 2014, 18 patients (13 males, 5 females) with myeloproliferative disorders referred to Gulhane Military Medical Academy Radiation Oncology Department underwent 22 courses of splenic irradiation using 3-dimensional computed tomography-based treatment planning and volumetric image guidance for palliation of symptomatic splenomegaly.

RESULTS

Median age was 64 years (range 28-79). Significant pain relief was achieved in 20 of the 22 splenic irradiation courses (90.9%). Improvement in hematological parameters was achieved in 8 of the 11 splenic irradiation courses applied for cytopenia (72.7%). At least a 50% reduction in splenic size was achieved in 18 of the 22 splenic irradiation courses (81.8%). Toxicity was manageable with supportive treatment including antiemetics and platelet or red blood cell transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

Splenic irradiation with a contemporary radiotherapeutic approach offers safe and effective palliation of symptomatic splenomegaly in myeloproliferative disorders.

Current therapies and their indications for the Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms

The groundbreaking discovery of the Janus-associated kinase 2 (JAK2) V617F mutation 10 years ago resulted in an unprecedented intensive basic and clinical research in Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). During these years, many new potential targets for therapy were identified that opened the era of targeted therapy for these diseases. However, only one new drug (ruxolitinib) has been approved during the past 40 years, and, although promising new therapies are evaluated, the armamentarium to treat MPN still relies on conventional drugs, like cytotoxic agents and anagrelide. The exact role of interferon (IFN) alfa still needs to be clarified in randomized studies, although it has been shown to be effective in MPNs for more than 25 years. The current therapeutic strategy for MPNs is based on the risk of vascular complication, which is the main cause of mortality and mortality in the medium term. However, the long-term outcome may be different, with an increasing risk of transformation to myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia during follow-up times. Medicines able to change this natural history have not been clearly identified yet, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation currently remains the unique curative approach, which is only justified for patients with high-risk myelofibrosis or for patients with MPNs that have transformed to myelodysplasia or acute leukemia.

How I treat myelofibrosis

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal myeloproliferation, dysregulated kinase signaling, and release of abnormal cytokines. In recent years, important progress has been made in the knowledge of the molecular biology and the prognostic assessment of MF. Conventional treatment has limited impact on the patients' survival; it includes a wait-and-see approach for asymptomatic patients, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, androgens, or immunomodulatory agents for anemia, cytoreductive drugs such as hydroxyurea for the splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms, and splenectomy or radiotherapy in selected patients. The discovery of the Janus kinase (JAK)2 mutation triggered the development of molecular targeted therapy of MF. The JAK inhibitors are effective in both JAK2-positive and JAK2-negative MF; one of them, ruxolitinib, is the current best available therapy for MF splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. However, although ruxolitinib has changed the therapeutic scenario of MF, there is no clear indication of a disease-modifying effect. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation remains the only curative therapy of MF, but due to its associated morbidity and mortality, it is usually restricted to eligible high- and intermediate-2-risk MF patients. To improve current therapeutic results, the combination of JAK inhibitors with other agents is currently being tested, and newer drugs are being investigated.

Splenic irradiation as a component of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in myelofibrosis with massive splenomegaly

Primary myelofibrosis is a hematologic neoplasm characterized by bone marrow fibrosis and extramedullary hematopoiesis. A similar clinical condition can occur at late stage of myeloproliferative neoplasms such as polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only curative strategy for both conditions, massive splenomegaly frequently observed in patients with myelofibrosis is considered to be a risk factor for graft failure or engraftment delay after transplantation. A proportion of patients can benefit from splenectomy before transplantation but such procedures have been associated with substantial surgical morbidity. Here, we report two elderly patients with myelofibrosis who received scheduled splenic irradiation for massive splenomegaly immediately prior to allogeneic HSCT instead of undergoing splenectomy. The first patient was a 60-year-old woman who received peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis from an HLA-identical sibling; the second patient was a 60-year-old man who received unrelated bone marrow transplantation for primary myelofibrosis. After receiving fractionated splenic irradiation and fludarabine-based reduced-intensity conditioning regimens, these patients showed remarkable reduction of their splenomegaly at the time of transplantation. They attained successful donor cell engraftment without severe complications related to splenic irradiation, while improvement in splenomegaly was durable. Our experience suggests that splenic irradiation before allogeneic HSCT might be a safe and effective alternative to splenectomy for myelofibrosis patients with massive splenomegaly in terms of reducing the risk of surgical morbidity.

Myelofibrosis: an update on current pharmacotherapy and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by symptoms mainly derived from anemia and splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms and associated with a median survival around 6 years. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) remains the only curative therapy of MF but is applicable to a minority of patients. Discovery of the JAK2 mutation has provided the basis for the introduction of a new class of drugs, the JAK inhibitors, in the treatment of MF.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review on the therapy of MF has been performed through a PubMed search, with special attention being paid to the available data on transplantation, the JAK inhibitors, and other new drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Conventional therapy of MF is usually adjusted to the predominant clinical symptoms in each patient, and its impact on survival is limited. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimens have increased the number of patients eligible for allo-SCT, but this procedure is still associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. The JAK inhibitors, such as ruxolitinib, can achieve profound symptomatic relief of the splenomegaly and the constitutional symptoms. However, they often accentuate the anemia and do not reduce the JAK2 allele burden, therefore lacking the potential to modify the natural history of MF.

Advances in the management of myelofibrosis

BACKGROUND

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare and serious hematologic malignancy classified as a Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). The disease is more common in males and in older individuals. Of the MPNs, MF presents with the most severe morbidity and greatest mortality. Although the cause of MF is unknown, it is thought to occur from acquired mutations that target the hematopoietic stem cell.

METHODS

We reviewed the current literature pertaining to the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, risk stratification, and treatment of MF. The strengths and limitations of present treatment options as well as the emerging clinical experience with Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitors are explored.

RESULTS

Diagnosis is often one of exclusion and is facilitated using the World Health Organization or International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment criteria, depending on whether primary or secondary MF is suspected. Treatment is complicated by a lack of disease familiarity of general practitioners and the advanced age of presenting patients. Although allogeneic stem cell transplant offers a potential cure, most treatments for this condition are limited to symptomatic management, with little to no effect on survival. Appropriate patient assessment and risk stratification are essential for predicting outcomes and allowing treating physicians to tailor therapy accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of MF, leading to novel therapeutic approaches. The discovery of the JAK2 mutation and the development of JAK2 inhibitors provide clinicians with a new effective treatment option. Ruxolitinib is the first JAK1/2 inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with intermediate- or high-risk MF. In clinical studies, ruxolitinib produced a significantly greater reduction in spleen size and improved quality of life compared with placebo or best available therapy. Several future therapies, including combination therapies with ruxolitinib, are currently under investigation.

How I treat splenomegaly in myelofibrosis

Symptomatic splenomegaly, a frequent manifestation of myelofibrosis (MF), represents a therapeutic challenge. It is frequently accompanied by constitutional symptoms and by anemia or other cytopenias, which make treatment difficult, as the latter are often worsened by most current therapies. Cytoreductive treatment, usually hydroxyurea, is the first-line therapy, being effective in around 40% of the patients, although the effect is often short lived. The immunomodulatory drugs, such as thalidomide or lenalidomide, rarely show a substantial activity in reducing the splenomegaly. Splenectomy can be considered in patients refractory to drug treatment, but the procedure involves substantial morbidity as well as a certain mortality risk and, therefore, patient selection is important. For patients not eligible for splenectomy, transient relief of the symptoms can be obtained with local radiotherapy that, in turn, can induce severe and long-lasting cytopenias. Allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only treatment with the potential for curing MF but, due to its associated morbidity and mortality, is usually restricted to a minority of patients with poor risk features. A new class of drugs, the JAK2 inhibitors, although also palliative, are promising in the splenomegaly of MF and will probably change the therapeutic algorithm of this disease.

Low dose palliative radiotherapy for splenomegaly in hematologic disorders

Splenomegaly (SM) is a common complication in hematologic disorders often associated with hypersplenism, and may cause pain, epigastric discomfort and variable systemic effects due to cytopenias. We retrospectively evaluated the results of palliative splenic irradiation (PSI) in terms of symptomatic relief in patients with hematologic disorders. In 1998-2006, 32 patients with hematologic disorders (median age 57) received 52 courses of PSI for SM. Twenty-one patients (66%) were diagnosed with myeloproliferative disorders (MPD), five patients (16%) had malignant lymphoma (ML), five patients (16%) had chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and one patient (3%) had hairy cell leukemia. Splenomegaly was accompanied by pain, anemia, thrombocytopenia and cachexia. Radiation therapy to the entire spleen was delivered by two parallel opposed fields using 0.5 Gy daily fractions given 5 days per week to a total dose of 6-10 Gy. PSI resulted in splenic size reduction in 78.8%, improvement of anemia in 75% and improvement of thrombocytopenia in 63.5% of PSI courses. The median survival (MS) of patients with MPD, CLL and ML was 45, 10 and 5 months, respectively. The MS of responders to PSI versus non-responders was 45 and 16 months, respectively (hazard ratio 0.17; p = 0.03; 95% confidence interval 0.035-0.84). In our hands, low dose PSI provided effective palliation for patients with hematologic disorders with SM. Splenic re-irradiation was feasible without excessive toxicity.

How I treat symptomatic splenomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis

Managing patients with myelofibrosis (MF), either those with primary MF or those whose MF has evolved from antecedent polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia, presents many challenges to the hematologist. MF patients have a range of debilitating disease manifestations (eg, massive splenomegaly, cytopenias, constitutional symptoms, and transformation to a treatment-refractory blast phase). Cure is potentially achievable through allogeneic stem cell transplantation; however, this therapy is either inappropriate or not feasible for the majority of patients. Therefore, remaining therapies are palliative but can be of significant value to some MF patients. In particular, management of symptomatic splenomegaly remains one of the most perplexing aspects of MF clinical care. Using medications is the simplest approach for reducing splenomegaly, yet achieving symptomatic response without undue myelosuppression is challenging. Splenectomy or radiotherapy offers benefit, but careful patient selection and close monitoring are required because both have the potential for dangerous adverse effects. Experimental medical therapies, such as JAK2 inhibitors, show promise and may soon play an important role in the management of symptomatic splenomegaly in MF patients. Future care of MF patients, including splenomegaly management, will continue to require the hematologist to select therapeutic options carefully in the context of realistic, achievable goals.

Advances in the therapy of chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis

The molecular basis of chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF) has remained elusive, thus hampering the development of effective targeted therapies. However, significant progress regarding the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenes is of this disease has been made in recent years that will likely provide ample opportunity for the investigation of novel therapeutic approaches. At the fore front of these advances is the discovery that 35%-55% of patients with CIMF harbor mutations in the Janus kinase 2 tyrosine kinase gene. Until very recently, the management of patients with CIMF involved the use of supportive measures, including growth factors, transfusions, or interferon, and the administration of cyto-reductive agents, such as hydroxyurea and anagrelide. However, several trials have demonstrated the efficacy of antiangiogenic agents alone or in combination with corticosteroids. In addition, the use of reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation has resulted in prolonged survival and lower transplant-related mortality.

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: disease overview and non-transplant treatment options

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) is currently classified as a classic (i.e. not yet molecularly defined) myeloproliferative disorder (MPD), along with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and polycythemia vera (PV). All three MPDs represent stem-cell-derived clonal myeloproliferation that, in the case of MMM, is accompanied by an intense bone marrow stromal reaction that includes collagen fibrosis, osteosclerosis, and angiogenesis. To date, both the molecular basis of the primary clonal process and the pathogenetic mechanisms that underlie the secondary histological changes remain elusive. Clinically, MMM is characterized by anemia, multi-organ extramedullary hematopoiesis that often involves the spleen and liver, constitutional symptoms, and premature death from either leukemic transformation or other disease complications. Current diagnosis is based on characteristic but not diagnostic bone marrow histological features. Modern therapy remains palliative but allogeneic stem cell transplantation might be curative to a selected group of patients. This chapter reviews both the old and the new therapy with regard to non-transplant treatment options for MMM.

Idiopathic myelofibrosis: pathogenesis to treatment

Idiopathic myelofibrosis (IMF) is the least common of the chronic myeloproliferative disorders and carries the worst prognosis with a median survival of 4 years. It is a clonal haematopoietic stem-cell disorder and, although the pathogenesis remains unclear, approximately 50% of cases are known to possess an activating JAK2 V617F mutation. In contrast, the characteristic stromal proliferation is a reactive, or secondary, event that results from the aberrant release of a variety of growth factors from megakaryocytes and monocytes. Treatment for most cases is supportive, although androgens, recombinant erythropoietin, steroids and thalidomide are effective modalities for the amelioration of anaemia. Myelosuppression, splenectomy and irradiation are valuable therapeutic modalities for specific clinical situations. Prognostic scores are available to aid the identification of cases for whom bone marrow transplantation should be considered. Recently, the use of reduced intensity conditioning has resulted in prolonged survival and lower transplant-related mortality. This review summarises the recent advances in the disease's pathogenesis and discusses the role of the various therapeutic options.

An audit of the indications for and techniques of palliative splenic radiotherapy in the UK

AIMS

This paper describes a national audit of the indications for, and techniques and toxicity of, palliative splenic radiotherapy in haematological disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A postal questionnaire was sent to consultant clinical oncologists treating haematological malignancies in the UK.

RESULTS

The response rate was 76%. The audit shows chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, myelofibrosis and chronic myeloid leukaemia to be the most common underlying conditions in which splenic irradiation is used. Painful splenomegaly and hypersplenism were the most common indications. Dose fractionation schedules vary widely across the UK, and also the level of full blood counts used to interrupt radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative splenic radiotherapy continues to be widely used in the UK in small numbers of patients and seems to be well tolerated. Re-irradiation for further symptomatic progression is also commonly carried out.

Modern management of myelofibrosis

The conventional treatment of myelofibrosis involves a wait-and-see approach for asymptomatic patients, oral chemotherapy for the hyperproliferative forms of the disease, androgens or erythropoietin for the anaemia, and splenectomy in selected patients. Low-dose thalidomide plus prednisone is a well-tolerated therapy for the anaemia and the thrombocytopenia of myelofibrosis, whereas imatinib has shown little efficacy. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the only curative therapy for myelofibrosis. Its standard modality has an associated mortality of about 30% and can be applied to younger patients with high-risk disease or resistant to conventional treatment. Reduced-intensity conditioning allo-SCT involves a low mortality and is a promising therapy for patients aged 45-70 years old with the above characteristics. Autologous SCT is a palliative therapy for patients resistant to conventional treatment who lack a suitable donor. The next candidates for the treatment of myelofibrosis are the thalidomide derivatives, the proteasome inhibitors, and vascular endothelial growth factor neutralizing antibodies.

The therapy of myelofibrosis: targeting pathogenesis

Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) encompasses the diagnoses of agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (idiopathic myelofibrosis), as well as the advanced phases of polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia (post polycythemic and post thrombocythemia myeloid metaplasia, respectively). MMM is a clonal, hematopoietic stem cell disorder in which neither the pathogenesis, nor a broadly applicable effective therapy have been described. Clinically, these patients experience progressive marrow replacement by fibrotic tissue, ineffective hematopoiesis, problematic cytopenia's, significant hepato-splenomegaly, extramedullary hematopoiesis, profound constitutional symptoms, and a risk of blastic transformation. Historically, therapies have been targeted at palliating symptoms (i.e. splenectomy, transfusions, hydroxyurea, erythropoietin, androgens, localized radiotherapy). Stem cell transplantation appears promising, but is often toxic and not broadly applicable due to co-morbidities and age of MMM patients. Non-myeloablative approaches to conditioning may broaden the applicability of stem cell transplantation in MMM, yet results to date are preliminary. Although a definitive molecular abnormality responsible for the pathogenesis of MMM has not been described, much has been learned about the aberrant expression of pro-fibrotic cytokines and the presence of increased angiogenesis in MMM. These pathogenetic insights have led to a series of pilot clinical trials with therapeutic agents targeting aberrantly expressed cytokines (and possibly angiogenesis) including Thalidomide (alone or in combination), Etanercept, and STI-571. Amongst these later agents Thalidomide has demonstrated the most promise (palliating disease associated cytopenia's), whereas the TNF-alpha inhibitor Etanercept has aided with MMM associated constitutional symptoms. Although these later trials have been helpful in a subset of patients, no agent to date has led to solid complete responses in MMM across the spectrum of disease manifestations. Further insights into the pathogenetic mechanisms responsible for myeloproliferation (aberrant cell signaling pathways, apoptotic resistance, other) are necessary to guide selection and testing of the expanding number of novel anti-neoplastic agents in chronic myeloid disorders and MMM.