Long-term follow-up of intensive ara-C-based chemotherapy followed by bone marrow transplantation for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: impact of induction Ara-C dose and post-remission therapy

Which Patients with Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Should Undergo a Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation? Case-Based Discussion

The decision to proceed to transplant for adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is not clear-cut. Relapse and nonrelapse mortality continue to plague the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) even when undertaken in complete remission (CR). Those considered to be at high risk for relapse often are considered for HSCT in first complete remission (CR1) while those at lower risk may not be referred until they have relapsed, when their chances for cure are very poor. In some patients who have a suitable histocompatible sibling, disease- or patient-related factors may override the potential benefit of allogeneic HSCT. Because many patients do not have a suitable histocompatible sibling, one has to consider the relative merits of autologous transplantation versus use of an alternative allogeneic stem cell source, such as a matched-unrelated donor (MUD), umbilical cord blood (UCB) donor, or haploidentical donor. Deciding among these options in comparison to chemotherapy even in high-risk patients is difficult. In the review, the risks and benefits of these choices are discussed to determine whether and by what means to proceed to HSCT in adult patients with ALL who are in CR1. Presented are two patients with ALL and a discussion of how the data we provide would lead to a decision about the selection of therapy.

The Role of Cytotoxic Therapy with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Therapy of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Adults: An Evidence-based Review

Evidence supporting the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults (> or =15 years) is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published medical literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence, and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence are presented and were reached unanimously by a panel of acute lymphoblastic leukemia experts. The priority areas of needed future research for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia are: definition of patients at high risk in first complete remission, beyond Philadelphia chromosome positive; outcomes of SCT in older (>50 years) adults; determination if reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning regimens yield an equivalent graft-versus-leukemia effect with reduced toxicity; monitoring of minimal residual disease to achieve disease control before SCT; and the use of cord blood and other alternative sources of stem cells for use in adult SCT recipients.

Intensive Therapy before or during the Conditioning Regimen of Allogeneic Marrow Transplantation in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients: We Must Choose to Reduce Toxicity—A Groupe Ouest-Est d’Etude des Leucémies et Autres Maladies du Sang Study

To improve the results in the treatment of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients, different strategies have been proposed. The intensification could concern the induction and early consolidation phases, the conditioning regimen before allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT), or both. We analyzed 2 consecutive trials for adult patients in first remission and with the same prognostic features. The Leucemie Aigue Lymphoblastique Paris-Ouest-France (LALPOF) protocol proposed alloBMT with standard conditioning after a classic induction and intensified consolidation scheme; the Groupe Ouest Est des Leucemies Aigues Lymphoblastiques (GOLEAL1) protocol tested an intensified induction and consolidation course before alloBMT with a reinforced conditioning regimen. The 4-year survival rates after alloBMT for LALPOF and GOELAL1 were, respectively, 71% +/- 12% and 36% +/- 13% ( P = .009). The 4-year disease-free survival reached 75% +/- 11% in the LALPOF study and 69% +/- 13% in the GOELAL1 study ( P = .30). The toxic death rate was significantly lower in the LALPOF (2/18) than in the GOELAL1 (6/15) group. Event-free survival at 4 years was significantly higher in LALPOF than in GOELAL1: 66% +/- 11% and 35% +/- 11%, respectively ( P = .02). For adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients in first remission, the intensification of chemotherapy before a reinforced conditioning regimen before alloBMT may lead to an increased toxic death rate.

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in adults is a relatively rare neoplasm with a curability rate around 30% at 5 years. This consideration makes it imperative to dissect further the biological mechanisms of disease, in order to selectively implement an hitherto unsatisfactory success rate. The recognition of discrete ALL subtypes (some of which deserve specific therapeutic approaches, like T-lineage ALL (T-ALL) and mature B-lineage ALL (B-ALL)) is possible through an accurate combination of cytomorphology, immunophenotytpe and cytogenetic assays and has been a major result of clinical research studies conducted over the past 20 years. Two-three major prognostic groups are now easily identifiable, with a survival probability ranging from <10 to 20% (Philadelphia-positive ALL) to about 50-60% (low-risk T-ALL and selected patients with B-lineage ALL). These issues are extensively reviewed and form the basis of current knowledge. The second major point relates to the emerging importance of studies that reveal a dysregulated gene activity and its clinical counterpart. It is now clear that prognostication is a complex matter ranging from patient-related issues to cytogenetics to molecular biology, including the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) and possibly gene array tests. On these bases, the role of a correct, highly personalised therapeutic choice will soon become fundamental. Therapeutic progress may be obtainable through a careful integration of chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation, and the new targeted treatments with highly specific metabolic inhibitors and humanised monoclonal antibodies.

High-dose melphalan and autotransplantation followed by post transplant maintenance chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission

A total of 65 adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) received 200 mg/m2 melphalan and an autograft in first remission, with a plan to receive 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), methotrexate (MTX), and vincristine-prednisone (VP) for 2 years afterwards. There was no transplant-related mortality. In all, 69% of patients received 6MP, 54% received MTX, and 49% received VP. The cumulative incidence of relapse at 5 years was 52%. The 5-year probabilities of disease-free (DFS) and overall (OS) survival were 48 and 55%. Age >30 years, >4 weeks to attain remission, and t(9;22) or t(4;11) karyotypes were adverse prognostic features. Patients with 0 (standard risk), 1 (intermediate risk), and 2-3 (high risk) adverse features had 5-year cumulative incidences of relapse of 19, 59, and 100% (P<0.0001), and 5-year probabilities of DFS of 80, 41, and 0% (P<0.0001). The 5-year probabilities of DFS for patients receiving 0, 1, 2, and 3 maintenance therapy agents were 19, 40, 51, and 70% (P=0.0097). Maintenance therapy intensity was an independent determinant of outcome in Cox analysis. These data show that a high-dose melphalan-based autograft is safe and could be widely applicable in ALL in first remission, and that maintenance chemotherapy very likely contributes to improved outcome of autografted ALL patients.

Progress and challenges in the therapy of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is a heterogeneous disease with distinct biologic and prognostic groupings. Although current therapies result in high complete remission rates, long-term disease-free survival rates have remained disappointingly low. Results from recent studies using risk-tailored approaches suggest improvement in overall survival for high-risk groups, such as those with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Furthermore, the incorporation of imatinib mesylate into the treatment regimen for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients may lead to better outcomes. Finally, quantification of minimal residual disease at various time points during therapy is being investigated as a means to predict more accurately a patient's response to therapy, and to make therapeutic decisions.

Molecular genetic events in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults focuses on the initial assessment of prognostic relevant genetic features as well as response-guided therapy based on molecular data. In at least half of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients, clonal chromosomal abnormalities can be identified that deregulate candidate oncogenes or transcription factors by introducing a heterologous promoter or enhancer. Altered cell cycle progression or upregulated tyrosine kinase activity are other important mechanisms. Most of the translocations can lead to the generation of fusion genes that are translated into chimeric oncogeneic proteins, such as BCR-ABL, providing targets for novel therapeutic agents.