Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of extended-release clarithromycin

Microparticles and nanoparticles-based approaches to improve oral treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped, flagellated bacterium that colonizes the stomach of half the world's population. Helicobacter pylori infection causes pathologies of varying severity. Standard oral therapy fails in 15-20% since the barriers of the oral route decrease the bioavailability of antibiotics and the intrinsic factors of bacteria increase the rates of resistance. Nanoparticles and microparticles are promising strategies for drug delivery into the gastric mucosa and targeting H. pylori. The variety of building blocks creates systems with distinct colloidal, surface, and biological properties. These features improve drug-pathogen interactions, eliminate drug depletion and overuse, and enable the association of multiple actives combating H. pylori on several fronts. Nanoparticles and microparticles are successfully used to overcome the barriers of the oral route, physicochemical inconveniences, and lack of selectivity of current therapy. They have proven efficient in employing promising anti-H. pylori compounds whose limitation is oral route instability, such as some antibiotics and natural products. However, the current challenge is the applicability of these strategies in clinical practice. For this reason, strategies employing a rational design are necessary, including in the development of nano- and microsystems for the oral route.

Experimental design and optimization of a novel dual-release drug delivery system with therapeutic potential against infection with Helicobacter pylori

The objective of this study was to develop clarithromycin-loaded lipid nanocarriers and incorporate them into microcapsules for pH-specific localized release of clarithromycin in the Helicobacter pylori microenvironment in order to obtain a gastro-retentive and pH-sensitive formulation. A Plackett-Burman design was applied to identify the effect of 5 factors on 3 responses. Then, a central composite design was applied to estimate the most important factors leading to the best compromise between lower particle size, polydispersity index and particle size changes. The optimized clarithromycin-loaded nanocapsules were employed to generate microcapsules by different methodologies. Nanocarriers and microcapsules were characterized in vitro. Experimental design and conditions were optimized to obtain nanocapsules of around 100 nm by a modified phase inversion-based process. High particle size homogeneity and high stability were achieved. At 4 °C both optimized lipid nanocapsules were stable during at least 365 days, confirming stability under those conditions. Clarithromycin incorporation in the nanocarrier was effective. Both types of microcoating were evaluated regarding their pH sensitivity. Spray drying microcapsules exhibited similar and uncontrolled release profiles at pH 2 and 7.4. Alternatively, when microcoatings were generated using an Encapsulator, release was insignificant at pH 2, while at pH 7.4 release was triggered, and appeared more appropriate to formulate microcapsules that release nanocarriers under pH neutral Helicobacter pylori microenvironment conditions, thereby permitting effective drug delivery in infected locations. The release of clarithromycin from lipid nanocarrier loaded microcapsules was pH-sensitive suggesting that this could be an effective strategy for clarithromycin delivery to the Helicobacter pylori microenvironment. Clarithromycin nanocapsules with and without microcoating showed a high anti-Helicobacter pylori activity in vitro.

Temporal-spatial variation and environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals in tributaries of the Han River watershed, South Korea

Eight compounds from three categories of pharmaceuticals [5 antibiotics, 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and 1 anti-epileptics] were monitored at 24 sites in the tributaries of the Han River watershed in South Korea, 2016. The seasonal occurrence, temporal-spatial variation, potential compound source(s), and a risk assessment of this watershed, which is the largest drinking water source in the country, were investigated. Clarithromycin was detected most frequently (72.2%) with the greatest median concentration (0.151 ± 0.072 μg L^-1), followed by carbamazepine and sulfamethoxazole. The seasonality of the pharmaceuticals was observed, with higher concentrations and detection frequencies in spring than in summer and autumn; this was possibly caused by lower levels of microbial activities associated with lower water temperatures than other seasons. In terms of geographical variation, urban areas had higher pharmaceutical concentrations than rural areas, which was attributed to the former's high population density and largest wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) regardless of season. The total concentration and detection frequency of WWTPs were 12.4 and 2.5 times higher in downstream sites than upstream sites, thereby conveying that WWTPs were the main source for the presence of pharmaceuticals in tributaries. According to the results produced from calculations of the risk quotient (RQ) of aquatic organisms, clarithromycin and sulfamethazine were identified as posing relatively high ecological risk (RQ > 1) during the spring that was identified for this study. This study can provide policymakers with scientific support for prioritizing pollutant management and collections of global data on emerging pollutants.

Enhancement of the properties of a drug by mono-deuteriation: reduction of acid-catalysed formation of a gut-motilide enol ether from 8-deuterio-erythromycin B

An efficient synthesis of 8-d-erythromycin B was achieved. A deuterium isotope effect suppresses formation of the corresponding enol ether, which may result in reduced gut-motilide effects.

Preparation, characterization and pharmacokinetics evaluation of clarithromycin-loaded Eudragit(®) L-100 microspheres

The aim of this work was to prepare pH-dependent clarithromycin microsphere formulation by emulsion solvent evaporation method, employing Eudragit(®) L-100. Prepared microspheres were evaluated by carrying out in vitro release and in vivo pharmacokinetics studies. Drug-polymer interactions were studied by differential scanning calorimetry, X-ray diffractometry analyses and results showed that clarithromycin was molecularly dispersed in the polymer. The particle size distribution of microspheres was found over the range of 10~50 μm. The drug is hardly released in the HCl solution pH 1.2 in the first 2 h, but is rapidly released in phosphate buffer pH 7.2, and the cumulated release reached 98.1 % at 8 h. The pharmacokinetic profiles were conducted open, randomized, two-period crossover design with a 7-day interval between doses in healthy beagle dogs. The results indicated that the extent of absorption of the clarithromycin-load microspheres was the same as pure drug, but different in the rate of drug absorption in vivo.

Clarithromycin Extended-Release Tablet

Clarithromycin is an orally active, advanced-generation macrolide that has been reformulated as an extended-release tablet (Biaxin) XL Filmtab allowing convenient once-daily administration. The reformulation is intended to improve patient compliance and the tolerability of the drug. Although maximum plasma clarithromycin concentrations are lower and reached later with the extended-release tablets than with the immediate-release tablets, the two formulations are bioequivalent with respect to the area under the plasma concentration-time curve. Bioequivalence is also achieved between the formulations for the microbiologically active metabolite, 14-hydroxy-clarithromycin. Two randomized trials in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) showed that a 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical cure rates of 83% and 85% and bacteriologic cure rates of 86% and 92% at the test-of-cure study visit. Similar rates of cure were achieved with a 7-day course of twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release and with a 10-day course of twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.A 7-day course of clarithromycin extended-release 1000 mg once daily produced clinical and bacteriologic cure rates of 88% and 86%, respectively, in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Similar cure rates were achieved in recipients of once-daily levofloxacin in the same trial. In patients with acute maxillary sinusitis, a 14-day course of either once-daily clarithromycin extended-release or twice-daily clarithromycin immediate-release produced statistically equivalent clinical cure rates of 85% and 79%, respectively. Both treatment groups achieved similar rates of radiographic success and resolution of sinusitis. Recent results indicate that clarithromycin extended-release 500 mg once daily for 5 days is also effective in the treatment of patients with streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis and in the treatment of AECB. The most frequently reported drug-related events with clarithromycin extended-release were abnormal taste (7% incidence), diarrhea (6%) and nausea (3%). Most adverse drug reactions were of a mild and transient nature. In comparative clinical trials, clarithromycin extended-release had an improved gastrointestinal tolerability profile compared with the immediate-release formulation. In addition, clarithromycin extended-release was better tolerated than amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and as well tolerated as levofloxacin. Further studies are required to assess the cost-effectiveness ratio of clarithromycin relative to comparator antibacterial agents.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin extended-release is an effective treatment for AECB, CAP, acute maxillary sinusitis, and pharyngitis (although not approved for the latter in the US), and is administered in a convenient dosage regimen that has the potential to encourage good compliance. The reformulation modulates clarithromycin absorption kinetics thereby improving tolerability. Therefore, clarithromycin extended-release provides a useful option for the treatment of specific respiratory tract infections.

Application of lactobionic acid and nonionic surfactants as solubilizing agents for parenteral formulation of clarithromycin

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to enhance the solubility of clarithromycin (CLR) using nonionic surfactants and some type of acids for preparation of the new formulations.

METHODS

Myrj 52 and chremophor (2.5 and 5% w/v) were used in two concentrations. To investigate solubility, the formulations were shaken for 48 hours at room temperature. For stability test, lyophilized samples were maintained in refrigerator at 4° C, and in oven at 40° C. Drug analysis was performed by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultraviolet detection.

RESULTS

Solubility tests indicated that lactobionic acid was the most effective to increase clarithromycin solubility and chremophor showed higher enhancing effect than myrj 52 on CLR solubility. The stability tests results also confirmed that shelf-lives of all formulations have been the equivalent to 24 months.

CONCLUSION

On the whole, formulations described in this article may be very suitable for industrial-scale manufacturing and clinical application.

Review of macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin), ketolids (telithromycin) and glycylcyclines (tigecycline)

The advanced macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolide, telithromycin, are structural analogs of erythromycin. They have several distinct advantages when compared with erythromycin, including enhanced spectrum of activity, more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, once-daily administration, and improved tolerability. Clarithromycin and azithromycin are used extensively for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, and Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease. Telithromycin is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Severe hepatotoxicity has been reported with the use of telithromycin.

Pharmacokinetics of rifampin and clarithromycin in patients treated for Mycobacterium ulcerans infection

In a randomized controlled trial in Ghana, treatment of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection with streptomycin (SM)-rifampin (RIF) for 8 weeks was compared with treatment with SM-RIF for 4 weeks followed by treatment with RIF-clarithromycin (CLA) for 4 weeks. The extent of the interaction of RIF and CLA combined on the pharmacokinetics of the two compounds is unknown in this population and was therefore studied in a subset of patients. Patients received CLA at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg of body weight once daily, rounded to the nearest 125 mg. RIF was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg, rounded to the nearest 150 mg. SM was given at a dose of 15 mg/kg once daily as an intramuscular injection. Plasma samples were drawn at steady state and analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated with the MW/Pharm (version 3.60) program. Comedication with CLA resulted in a 60% statistically nonsignificant increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for RIF of 25.8 mg x h/liter (interquartile ratio [IQR], 21.7 to 31.5 mg x h/liter), whereas the AUC of RIF was 15.2 mg x h/liter (IQR, 15.0 to 17.5 mg x h/liter) in patients comedicated with SM (P = 0.09). The median AUCs of CLA and 14-hydroxyclarithromycin (14OH-CLA) were 2.9 mg x h/liter (IQR, 1.5 to 3.8 mg x h/liter) and 8.0 mg x h/liter (IQR, 6.7 to 8.6 mg x h/liter), respectively. The median concentration of CLA was above the MIC of M. ulcerans, but that of 14OH-CLA was not. In further clinical studies, a dose of CLA of 7.5 mg/kg twice daily should be used (or with an extended-release formulation, 15 mg/kg should be used) to ensure higher levels of exposure to CLA and an increase in the time above the MIC compared to those achieved with the currently used dose of 7.5 mg/kg once daily.

Macrolides, ketolides, and glycylcyclines: azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin, tigecycline

The advanced macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolide, telithromycin, are structural analogs of erythromycin. They have several distinct advantages when compared with erythromycin, including enhanced spectrum of activity, more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, once-daily administration, and improved tolerability. Clarithromycin and azithromycin are used extensively for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, sexually transmitted diseases, and Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease. Telithromycin is approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Severe hepatotoxicity has been reported with the use of telithromycin.

Treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

BACKGROUND

Controversies persist regarding the optimal management of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the available evidence on relevant issues, namely the need for administering antimicrobials in patients with AECB, the identification of the subgroup of patients with AECB needing antibiotics, the antimicrobial regimen of choice and its optimal duration, the existence of new agents, and the value of non-antimicrobial regimens for AECB.

METHODS

Data from various sources of evidence, including recent relevant meta-analyses, were appraised.

CONCLUSION

Administration of antimicrobial agents, combined with bronchodilators and systemic corticosteroids, is warranted in approximately half of AECBs (i.e., in bacterial exacerbations) to achieve a survival benefit. Simple clinical parameters, mainly sputum purulence, and biomarkers, such as procalcitonin, are useful in identifying patients requiring antibiotics. Advanced antibiotics (quinolones, macrolides, or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) are more effective than 'old' antibiotics in AECB; regimens of short duration (for 5 days) are preferred. There is no difference between several classes of advanced antibiotics regarding their short-term effectiveness; however, quinolones are associated with better long-term outcomes than macrolides. Newer quinolones and new formulations of macrolides enrich clinicians' armamentarium against AECB.

Drug utilization of clarithromycin for gastrointestinal disease treatment

AIM: To evaluate the patterns of use of clarithromycin for gastrointestinal disease treatment and promote its rational use.

METHODS: Using a structured pro forma, we conducted a two-month survey of the electronic prescriptions containing immediate-release (IR) or sustained-release (SR) product of clarithromycin for outpatients with gastrointestinal diseases in a 2200-bed general hospital. Suitability of the prescription was audited retrospectively.

RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-four prescriptions of SR product and 110 prescriptions of IR product were prescribed for gastrointestinal disease treatment. Among prescriptions for anti-Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) therapy, triple therapy take the dominant position (91.8%), followed by quadruple therapy (4.3%) and dual therapy (3.9%). Amoxicillin was the most frequently co-prescribed antibiotic. Furazolidone and levofloxacin are used more widely than metronidazole or tinidazole. Clarithromycin SR was administered at inappropriate time points in all prescriptions. Fifty percent of all prescriptions of clarithromycin SR, and 6.4% of prescriptions of clarithromycin IR, were prescribed at inappropriate dosing intervals. Surprisingly, disconcordance between diagnoses and indications was observed in all prescriptions of clarithromycin SR which has not been approved for treating H pylori infection although off-label use for this purpose was reported in literature. On the contrary, only one prescription (0.9%) of clarithromycin IR was prescribed for unapproved indication (i.e. gastro-oesophageal reflux disease). 1.4% of prescriptions for chronic gastritis or peptic ulcer treatment were irrational in that clarithromycin was not co-prescribed with gastric acid inhibitors. Clinical significant CYP3A based drug interactions with clarithromycin were identified.

CONCLUSION: There is a great scope to improve the quality of clarithromycin prescribing in patients with gastrointestinal disease, especially with regard to administration schedule, concordance between indications and diagnoses and management of drug interactions.

Role for 5-day, once-daily extended-release clarithromycin in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

BACKGROUND

Clarithromycin is commonly dosed for 7 or more days in patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). Studies with other antibiotics have shown equivalent efficacy, reduced/similar frequency of adverse events, improved adherence and patient satisfaction, and lower treatment costs with a shorter treatment course.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study population was derived from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind (North America)/single-blind (France) comparative trials in which outpatients at least 35 years old with a presumptive diagnosis of obstructive ABECB were randomized to receive clarithromycin extended-release (ER) 1000 mg once daily for 5 days or a comparator agent--clarithromycin immediate-release (IR) 500 mg twice daily for 7 days (in North America) or telithromycin 800 mg once daily for 5 days (in France).

RESULTS

A total of 818 patients were randomized (411 to clarithromycin ER and 407 to a comparator agent). The clinical cure rate in clinically evaluable patients at the follow-up visit was 90% each for the clarithromycin ER group (318/353) and the comparator group (318/355). The patient bacteriological cure rate and the overall target pathogen eradication rate in clinically and bacteriologically evaluable patients were each 92% for the clarithromycin ER group (155/168 and 189/205, respectively) and 93% for the comparator group (147/158 and 183/197, respectively) at the follow-up visit. The study drugs were generally well tolerated, with < 2% of patients discontinuing their treatment prematurely due to a drug-related adverse event. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 18% (73/411) in the clarithromycin ER group and 24% (97/407) in the comparator group. Clarithromycin ER-treated patients reported statistically significantly fewer episodes of abdominal pain than did patients treated with a comparator agent (0.2% vs. 1.7%, respectively; p = 0.037). This combined analysis is limited by differing blinding methods, comparator agents, and their duration of administration. Furthermore, many patients were excluded from the clinically and bacteriologically evaluable group due to lack of a pretreatment target pathogen.

CONCLUSION

A once daily, 5-day clarithromycin ER regimen appears to be a suitable choice for treating patients with ABECB.

Preparation of prolonged release clarithromycin microparticles for oral use and theirin vitro evaluation

Prolonged release microparticles of clarithromycin (CL) were prepared using Eudragit RL 100 and RS 100 by spray-drying and casting-drying techniques. For the characterization of those microparticles, preparation yield, particle size distribution, X-ray diffraction, thermal behavior, active agent content and in vitro dissolution from the microparticles were performed. HPLC was used for the assay of clarithromycin and the assay method was validated. All the formulations obtained showed prolonged release when compared to pure clarithromycin. Microparticles prepared by spray-drying method had a slower release compared to those of casting-drying method. Spray-drying method seems to be a more suitable method to prepare microparticles for prolongation in release.

Comparative tolerability, safety and efficacy of tablet formulations of twice-daily clarithromycin 250 mg versus once-daily extended-release clarithromycin 500 mg in pediatric and adolescent patients

Clarithromycin is widely used to treat respiratory tract and superficial skin infections in pediatric and adult populations. Using clinical endpoints and 7-day therapy, we compared the efficacy of clarithromycin 250 mg tablets given twice daily versus clarithromycin 500 mg extendedrelease tablets given once daily in ambulatory children and adolescents 6 to 16 years old. Of the 199 evaluable patients, 124 were infected with group A streptococcal pharyngitis, 39 with sinusitis, 21 with ambulatory pneumonia, and 15 with superficial skin infections. The overall cure rate exceeded 90% for each treatment group. Discontinuation rates and adverse events were 4.5% and 24.6%, respectively.

Macrolide immunomodulatory effects and symptom resolution in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis and acute maxillary sinusitis: a focus on clarithromycin

Bacterial respiratory tract infections are common in the primary care setting and patients often seek the assistance of a healthcare professional in order to achieve resolution of their symptoms. Antibiotic agents that offer rapid symptom relief, in addition to excellent bacteriological and clinical cure, are highly desired. Macrolides have proven to be highly effective in treating acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute maxillary sinusitis. In addition, immunomodulatory effects that may contribute to symptom resolution have been reported. This article reviews current literature on symptom resolution in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and acute maxillary sinusitis, with a focus on clarithromycin, and explores the potential mechanisms that may contribute to this action.

Staphylococcal skin infections in children: rational drug therapy recommendations

Staphylococcus aureus remains one of the most common and troublesome of bacteria causing disease in humans, despite the development of effective antibacterials and improvement in hygiene. The organism is responsible for over 70% of all skin and soft tissue infections in children and accounts for up to one-fifth of all visits to pediatric clinics. Skin and soft tissue infections that are predominantly caused by S. aureus include bullous and non-bullous impetigo, folliculitis, furunculosis, carbunculosis, cellulitis, surgical and traumatic wound infections, mastitis, and neonatal omphalitis. Other skin and soft tissue infections may also be caused by S. aureus but are often polymicrobial in origin and require special consideration. These include burns, decubitus ulcers (particularly in the perianal region), puncture wounds of the foot, as well as human and mammalian bites. Treatment of staphylococcal skin infections varies from topical antiseptics to prolonged intravenous antibacterials, depending on severity of the lesions and the health of the child. The treatment of choice for oral antibacterials remains the penicillinase-resistant penicillins such as flucloxacillin. Cefalexin and erythromycin are suitable cost-effective alternatives with broader cover, although care must be taken with the use of macrolides because of development of resistance to multiple families of antibacterials, particularly the lincosamides. Other cephalosporins such as cefadroxil and cefprozil are also effective, can be given once daily and have a better tolerability profile -- while azithromycin has a further advantage of a 3-day course. However, all of these agents are more expensive. Although the antibacterials have been given for 10 days in most clinical trials, there is no evidence that this duration is more effective than a 7-day course. In children requiring intravenous therapy, ceftriaxone has a major advantage over other antibacterials such as sulbactam/ampicillin and cefuroxime in that it can be given once daily and may, therefore, be suitable for outpatient treatment of moderate-to-severe skin infections. Newer-generation cephalosporins and loracarbef are also effective and have a broader spectrum of activity, but do not offer any added benefit and are significantly more expensive. Skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are still relatively uncommon in children. Well children with community-acquired MRSA infections can be treated with clindamycin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (cotrimoxazole), but must be observed closely for potentially severe adverse effects. In severe infections, vancomycin remains the treatment of choice, while intravenous teicoplanin and clindamycin are suitable alternatives. Linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin are currently showing great promise for the treatment of multi-resistant Gram-positive infections. While the choice of antibacterial is important, supportive management, including removal of any infected foreign bodies, surgical drainage of walled-off lesions, and regular wound cleaning, play a vital role in ensuring cure.

Clarithromycin extended-release in community-acquired respiratory tract infections

Clarithromycin extended-release (ER) is a second-generation macrolide with bactericidal activity against a broad group of pathogens. It allows for convenient once-daily dosing (2 x 500 mg/day), and has less severe adverse effects than the immediate-release (IR) formulation of the drug, which may result in improved patient compliance. Clarithromycin ER has been approved for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute maxillary sinusitis and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. In comparison to the IR formulation, clarithromycin ER demonstrates prolonged absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, allowing for once-daily dosing with improved gastrointestinal tolerability. Various double-blind, randomised clinical trials and group studies have found clarithromycin ER to be an efficacious treatment option, comparable with clarithromycin IR, or its other competitors.

Pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin extended-release (ER) tablets in patients with AIDS

BACKGROUND

Clarithromycin is a key agent in effective antimycobacterial therapy and prophylaxis for AIDS-related disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (dMAC) infection. Immediate-release (IR) clarithromycin tablets are dosed at 500 mg bid for these indications. A new extended-release (ER) tablet of clarithromycin has been developed and approved at a dosing interval of once every 24 hours for treatment of respiratory tract bacterial infections. However, the pharmacokinetics of clarithromycin ER in AIDS patients with or at risk for dMAC has not been previously investigated.

METHOD

We conducted a randomized, crossover trial in which 14 AIDS patients received clarithromycin ER, 1000 mg once daily, and clarithromycin IR, 500 mg bid, each for 1 week, with pharmacokinetic sampling at the end of each week.

RESULTS

The mean of the individual AUC ratios for clarithromycin ER vs. IR was 1.09 (90% CI, 0.94-1.24). Adverse events were no more severe or frequent with clarithromycin ER than IR.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin ER is a once-daily regimen that is as well tolerated as standard bid IR clarithromycin dosing and has average bioequivalence to the IR formulation in patients with AIDS.

Efficacité et tolérance de la clarithromycine, forme à libération modifiée en traitement court de cinq jours dans les exacerbations aiguës de bronchite chronique, comparativement à la télithromycine

BACKGROUND

The extended-release formulation of clarithromycin (CLA-ER) allows using this macrolide as a single daily dose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the CLA-ER formulation (500 mgx2) vs telithromycin (TELI) (400 mgx2) as a short course 5-day treatment, once a day, in patients with AECB.

METHOD

This randomized double-blind study was conducted in patients with AECB without severe airflow limitation (FEV1>35%), with sputum purulence (mandatory criterion), and with either increased sputum volume or increased dyspnea, or both (Anthonisen criteria I or II).

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-two patients were assessed (62.6 years of age+/-12.9, men: 58.8%) positive culture on inclusion for 53.8%, with Haemophilus influenzae (N=57), Moraxella catarrhalis (N=42), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (N=41). In the per protocol population, the clinical success rate at day 8 was 97% (161/166) vs 97% (146/151), 97.5% CI=[-4.12 -4.71], the clinical cure rate at day 30 was 78% (129/166) versus 77% (116/151), P=0.85, and mean time without recurrence was 62 days versus 61 days (P=0.51), in CLA-ER and TELI groups, respectively. Fourteen patients in the CLA-ER group (8.2%) and 20 patients in the TELI group (12.4%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (P=0.21), upon which gastrointestinal events were the most commonly reported treatment-related ones.

CONCLUSION

CLA-ER (1000 mg once a day) for 5 days is at least as effective as telithromycin in the treatment of AECB without severe airflow limitation and is well tolerated.

Evaluation ofin-vitro dissolution andin-vivo absorption for two different film-coated pellets of clarithromycin

The aim of this study was to compare two formulations of film-coated pellets containing clarithromycin after single oral dose study in healthy male volunteers. Two formulations with different coating polymers were prepared: formulation-1 (F-1) was prepared by incorporating three kinds of pH-dependent gradient-release coated pellets into capsules and formulation-2 (F-2) was prepared by coated with an insoluble semiosmotic film. Release profiles of film-coated pellets were evaluated using paddle method under different conditions. Pharmacokinetic profiles of these formulations were obtained in three healthy male volunteers and compared to commercially available immediate release (IR) tablets. The relative bioavailability based on the AUC0-24h was found to be 96.2% and 58.7% for F-1 and F-2 compared with IR, and the Tmax was delayed.

Comparative efficacy of once daily, 5-day short-course therapy with clarithromycin extended-release versus twice daily, 7-day therapy with clarithromycin immediate-release in acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of two clarithromycin regimens, extended-release (ER) 1000 mg once daily for 5 days and immediate-release (IR) 500 mg twice daily for 7 days, in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study of ambulatory patients at least 40 years old with a presumptive diagnosis of ABECB, purulent sputum, and documented evidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) < 70% of predicted value. Clinical cure, bacteriological cure, and target pathogen eradication rates were determined at a test-of-cure visit (study days 14-40). Safety was assessed based on the incidence of study drug-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 485 patients were randomized (240 to ER and 245 to IR). Clinical cure rates were similar for evaluable patients treated with ER (84%, 157/187) and those treated with IR (84%, 172/204) (95% CI -7.9, 7.2). The bacteriological cure rates were 87% (82/94) and 89% (91/102), and the overall target pathogen eradication rates were 88% (107/122) and 89% (117/131) for the respective treatment groups. The incidence of adverse events was 13% (31/240) in the ER group and 18% (45/245) in the IR group. The rate of gastrointestinal adverse events was lower with ER (8%, 19/240) compared to IR (11%, 26/245). Clarithromycin ER-treated patients reported statistically significantly fewer adverse events due to abnormal taste than did clarithromycin IR-treated patients (3% and 8%, respectively, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSION

Both once-daily, 5-day, short-course therapy with clarithromycin ER and 7-day, twice-daily therapy with clarithromycin IR were effective in resolving clinical signs/symptoms of ABECB and eradicating the causative pathogens, with no statistically significant difference in clinical cure rate between the treatment groups. Clarithromycin ER was better tolerated, causing fewer gastrointestinal adverse events and statistically significantly fewer reports of abnormal taste as compared with clarithromycin IR.

Once daily clarithromycin extended-release vs twice-daily amoxicillin/clavulanate in patients with acute bacterial sinusitis: a randomized, investigator-blinded study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of clarithromycin extended-release (ER) to amoxicillin/ clavulanate in patients diagnosed with acute bacterial sinusitis.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a controlled, multicenter, investigator-blinded study, 437 ambulatory patients at least 12 years old with signs/symptoms and radiographic findings of acute sinusitis were randomized to receive clarithromycin ER 1000 mg once daily or amoxicillin/ clavulanate 875 mg/l25 mg twice daily for 14 days.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical and bacteriological response rates were determined at a test-of-cure visit, which was conducted up to 10 days following the completion of treatment. Radiological response was assessed at a follow-up visit.

RESULTS

The clinical cure rate in clinically evaluable patients was 98% (184/188) in the clarithromycin ER group and 97% (179/185) in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (95% CI for the difference in rates [-2.4%, 4.7%]). Clinical cure was sustained at the follow-up visit (96% for each treatment group). The pathogen eradication rates were 94% (61/65) in the clarithromycin ER group and 98% (61/62) in the amoxicillin/clavulanate group (95% CI for difference in rates [-12.0%, 2.9%]). The radiological success rate was 94% (172/183) in both the clarithromycin ER and amoxicillin/clavulanate groups (95% CI for difference in rates [-4.9%, 4.9%]). Symptomatic improvement or relief was observed as early as 2 days-5 days after the initiation of study drug, with a statistically significantly higher resolution rate of sinus pressure (p = 0.027) and improvement/resolution rate of nasal congestion (p = 0.035) during treatment with clarithromycin ER. The resolution/improvement rate at the test-of-cure visit for each treatment group was > or = 94% for the primary acute sinusitis signs/symptoms, with a statistically significantly higher resolution/improvement rate of purulent nasal discharge with clarithromycin ER (p = 0.010). Both study drugs had a positive and rapid impact on quality of life. Patients reported a high level of satisfaction and probability of using either study antibiotic again, and health care resource use was low, with slightly fewer sinusitis-related physician and outpatient visits required by patients in the clarithromycin ER group (p = 0.055). The treatment groups were comparable with respect to incidence of drug-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In this multinational population of patients with acute bacterial sinusitis, clarithromycin ER was comparable, and for selected measures superior, to amoxicillin/clavulanate based on clinical, bacteriological, and radiological responses as well as quality of life measures, satisfaction with antibiotic therapy, and health care resource utilization.

Macrolides and ketolides: azithromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin

The advanced macrolides, azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolide telithromycin are structural analogues of erythromycin. They have several distinct advantages when compared with erythromycin including enhanced spectrum of activity, more favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, once daily administration, and improved tolerability. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics, antimicrobial activity, clinical use, and adverse effects of these antimicrobial agents.

Clarithromycin in 2003: sustained efficacy and safety in an era of rising antibiotic resistance

Data from surveillance studies show increasing prevalence of respiratory pathogens resistant to commonly used antibiotics. Thus, a Medline search was conducted to identify studies of clarithromycin, especially those addressing macrolide resistance. Changing trends of in vitro susceptibility have not affected clinical efficacy with clarithromycin. Over the last 12 years, clarithromycin study results have shown consistent rates of clinical cure and bacteriological eradication, which are similar to those observed with comparator agents. The incidence of clarithromycin treatment failure in patients infected with Streptococcus pneumoniae is substantially less than that predicted by macrolide resistance rates from surveillance programmes. In summary, despite widespread use since its introduction, clarithromycin remains active both in vitro and in vivo against clinically relevant respiratory tract pathogens.

Impact of pharmacodynamics on dosing of macrolides, azalides, and ketolides

The study of pharmacodynamics characterizes the relationship between changing drug concentrations over time and antimicrobial and toxicologic effects and thereby offers a targeted approach to the design of dosing regimens for many antimicrobials. Distinct patterns of antimicrobial dynamics have been elucidated from these relationships and pharmacodynamic parameters (peak-MIC, AUC-MIC, T > MIC) have been used to quantify antimicrobial effects in relation to drug exposure. These relationships can be used to predict efficacy of a given dosing regimen. The accuracy of these predictions is influenced, in part, by the completeness of the model in which they are studied. This article discusses various in vitro and in vivo studies and clinical data that have contributed to the understanding of pharmacodynamics of the macrolides, azalides, and ketolides.

Short-course therapy of acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter comparison of extended-release versus immediate-release clarithromycin

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of two clarithromycin formulations given for 5 days to patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (ABECB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter study of ambulatory patients between 40 and 75 years of age with a medical history of chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a presumptive diagnosis of ABECB who met Anthonisen Type 1 criteria (increased dyspnea, increased sputum volume and increased sputum purulence). Eligible patients received a 5-day course of clarithromycin extended-release (ER) 500 mg once daily or clarithromycin immediate-release (IR) 250 mg twice daily. Clinical cure, bacteriological cure and pathogen eradication rates were determined at the end of therapy and at a follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Clinical cure rates were similar at the test-of-cure visit for evaluable patients in the clarithromycin ER group (97%, 298/307) and clarithromycin IR group (98%, 300/307) (95% CI (-3.2, 1.9)). The bacteriological cure rate was 89% and the pathogen eradication rate was 90% in both treatment groups. Resolution or improvement in cough, sputum production, sputum volume and sputum appearance was observed in > 90% of evaluable patients in each treatment group. The incidence of study drug-related adverse events was 6.6% (23/351) in the clarithromycin ER group and 5.4% (19/352) in the clarithromycin IR group. The most frequently occurring study drug-related adverse events were abdominal pain, diarrhea and taste perversion.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin ER 500 mg once daily for 5 days is equivalent to clarithromycin IR 250 mg twice daily for 5 days in treating adults with ABECB. Both regimens were effective in resolving clinical signs and symptoms of ABECB and eradicating the target pathogens, and were well tolerated.

Comparison of 5 days of extended-release clarithromycin versus 10 days of penicillin V for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis: results of a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study in adolescent and adult patients

OBJECTIVE

This study compared a short-course of clarithromycin with a standard course of penicillin V in patients with tonsillopharyngitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 539 patients, aged 12-75 years, were randomized to receive either clarithromycin extended-release (ER) 500 mg once daily for 5 days or penicillin V 500 mg three times daily for 10 days in this multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Eligibility required a positive antigen test for group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS) followed by confirmatory culture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Bacteriological and clinical assessments were conducted at each study visit (visit 1: study day 1; visit 2: study day 3; visit 3: study days 8-12; visit 4: study days 13-20; and visit 5: study days 40-50).

RESULTS

At the test-of-cure visit (visit 3 for clarithromycin ER patients and visit 4 for penicillin V patients) in per-protocol patients, 5 days of clarithromycin ER was comparable to 10 days of penicillin V in eradicating S. pyogenes (89% (157/177) vs 90% (139/154) respectively; 95% CI for difference (-8.2, 5.1)). Bacterial eradication was sustained in both treatment groups at the follow-up visit (88% (135/153) vs 91% (112/123) respectively; 95% CI for difference (-10.0, 4.4)). Clinical cure was achieved in > or = 94% of patients in each treatment group. The most commonly reported study drug-related adverse events (< or = 3% in either treatment group) were abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia and nausea.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin ER 500 mg once daily for 5 days is equally effective as penicillin V 500 mg three times daily for 10 days in the treatment of adolescent and adult patients with streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.

An open-label, randomized, multicenter, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of 7 days of treatment with clarithromycin extended-release tablets versus clarithromycin immediate-release tablets for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of clarithromycin extended-release (ER) tablets and immediate-release (IR) tablets.

METHODS

This was a Phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter, comparative study in ambulatory patients with a diagnosis of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either 1 clarithromycin ER 500-mg tablet QD for 7 days or 1 clarithromycin IR 250-mg tablet BID for 7 days. Clinical and bacteriologic responses were assessed within 48 hours after the last dose of study drug and at a test-of-cure visit 21 +/- 2 days posttreatment.

RESULTS

Of 233 patients randomized, 162 (86/117 [73.5%] in the ER group and 76/115 [66.1%] in the IR group) completed the study protocol. Compliance did not differ significantly between the treatment groups; however, significantly fewer patients in the ER group reported missing doses of study medication than in the IR group (7/118 [5.9%] vs 16/115 [13.9%]; P = 0.04). The clinical cure rates for the clarithromycin ER and IR groups were 81.0% (68/84) and 82.1% (64/78) and the clinical success (clinical cure plus clinical improvement) rates were 94.0% [79/84] and 89.7% [70/78], respectively. There were insufficient data for analysis of bacteriologic efficacy. However, bacteria were eradicated or presumed eradicated in 71.4% (10/14) and 79.2% (19/24) of patients in the ER and IR groups, respectively. The number of adverse events (AEs) considered to be possibly or probably related to study drug (23.4% [52/222] of patients receiving clarithromycin ER and 24.4% [43/176] of patients receiving clarithromycin IR) was similar between groups, as was the severity of these events (94.2% [49/52] in the ER group classified as mild or moderate vs 93.0% [40/43] in the IR group). Overall, the most commonly reported AEs were diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain, headache, and taste disturbance.

CONCLUSION

Clarithromycin ER 500-mg tablets QD for 7 days were as effective and well tolerated as clarithromycin IR 250-mg tablets BID for 7 days in treating adults with AECB.

A controlled, double-blind, multicenter study comparing clarithromycin extended-release tablets and levofloxacin tablets in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Macrolides and fluoroquinolones are frequently used for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the safety profile and efficacy of clarithromycin extended-release (ER) tablets with those of levofloxacin tablets for the treatment of CAP in ambulatory adult patients.

METHODS

In a Phase III, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study, ambulatory adult patients (> or = 18 years) with signs and symptoms of CAP received a 7-day course of treatment with either clarithromycin ER (two 500-mg tablets once daily) or levofloxacin (two 250-mg tablets once daily). A diagnosis of CAP was confirmed by radiography of the chest and physical examination, and sputum samples were analyzed to identify etiologic pathogen(s). Tolerability was assessed through subjective reports of adverse events and through changes in physical findings, concomitant medications, and laboratory values.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in terms of sex, age, race, or body weight. The mean age was 50 years (range, 18-91 years). Of 299 patients randomized and treated, 252 were clinically evaluable (128 clarithromycin ER, 124 levofloxacin). The 95% CI for the difference between cure rates demonstrated equivalence of the 2 treatments. Among clinically evaluable patients at the test-of-cure visit, clinical cure rates were 88% (113/128) and 86% (107/124), and radiographic success rates were 95% (117/123) and 88% (104/118) for clarithromycin ER and levofloxacin, respectively. Both treatment regimens were effective in resolving and improving clinical signs and symptoms of CAP. Among clinically and bacteriologically evaluable pa- tients, bacteriologic cure rates were 86% (80/93) and 88% (85/97) for clarithromycin ER and levofloxacin, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 treatment groups in the overall incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Clarithromycin ER demonstrated equivalent efficacy and tolerability to the fluoroquinolone levofloxacin in a group of ambulatory adult patients with CAP. Clarithromycin ER also appeared to be safe in the population studied.

Serum bactericidal activity of extended-release clarithromycin against macrolide-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the serum bactericidal activity (SBA) over time of extended-release clarithromycin against moderately resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

DESIGN

Prospective, single-dose pharmacodynamic study.

SETTING

University-affiliated research center.

SUBJECTS

Eleven healthy male volunteers.

INTERVENTION

All volunteers received a single dose of extended-release clarithromycin as two 500-mg tablets, and blood samples were obtained at 0, 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after administration of the dose.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

For each blood sample, a serum bactericidal titer (SBT) was determined against S. pneumoniae strains with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 microg/ml to clarithromycin. The median SBT was determined for each time period. The extended-release formulation of clarithromycin exhibited SBA for 24 hours against pneumococcal strains with MICs of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 microg/ml. No SBA was observed against isolates with MICs of 4.0 or 8.0 microg/ml.

CONCLUSION

The extended-release formulation of clarithromycin, taken once/day, will provide SBA for 24 hours against strains of S. pneumoniae with MICs of 2.0 microg/ml or less.