Pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in patients with moderate and severe hepatic dysfunction

Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients with Cirrhosis: Pharmacokinetics, Benefits and Drawbacks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the pharmacokinetics, benefits, and risks of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in cirrhotic patients, focusing on the appropriateness of their use and potential adverse effects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies highlight significant pharmacokinetic alterations in PPIs among cirrhotic patients, with marked increases in lansoprazole and pantoprazole exposure and relatively stable levels of esomeprazole. While effective for managing acid-related disorders and post-band ulcer rebleeding, evidence supporting PPI use for portal hypertension-related bleeding is lacking. Emerging research suggests potential adverse effects such as hepatic decompensation, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, and increased mortality, possibly linked to dysbiosis and bacterial translocation. PPI use in cirrhotic patients alters pharmacokinetics significantly, with esomeprazole potentially safer in advanced cirrhosis. The review advises caution in routine PPI use beyond acid-related conditions due to limited evidence and substantial risks. It underscores the need for careful risk-benefit assessments and exploration of alternative therapies. Future research should aim to identify safer management strategies for portal hypertension complications and to develop evidence-based guidelines for PPI use in patients with cirrhosis.

PBPK modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in different CYP2C19 genotypes

Pantoprazole is used to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), maintain healing of erosive esophagitis (EE), and control symptoms related to Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES). Pantoprazole is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, converting to 4'-demethyl pantoprazole. CYP2C19 is a genetically polymorphic enzyme, and the genetic polymorphism affects the pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of pantoprazole. In this study, we aimed to establish the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in populations with various CYP2C19 metabolic activities. A comprehensive investigation of previous reports and drug databases was conducted to collect the clinical pharmacogenomic data, physicochemical data, and disposition properties of pantoprazole, and the collected data were used for model establishment. The model was evaluated by comparing the predicted plasma concentration-time profiles and/or pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC and Cmax) with the clinical observation results. The predicted plasma concentration-time profiles in different CYP2C19 phenotypes properly captured the observed profiles. All fold error values for AUC and Cmax were included in the two-fold range. Consequently, the minimal PBPK model for pantoprazole related to CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism was properly established and it can predict the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in different CYP2C19 phenotypes. The present model can broaden the insight into the individualized pharmacotherapy for pantoprazole.

Safe use of proton pump inhibitors in patients with cirrhosis

Aims

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) belong to the most frequently used drugs, also in patients with cirrhosis. PPIs are extensively metabolized by the liver, but practice guidance on prescribing in cirrhosis is lacking. We aim to develop practical guidance on the safe use of PPIs in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

A systematic literature search identified studies on the safety (i.e. adverse events) and pharmacokinetics of PPIs in cirrhotic patients. This evidence and data from the product information was reviewed by an expert panel who classified drugs as safe; no additional risks known; additional risks known; unsafe; or unknown. Guidance was aimed at the oral use of PPIs and categorized by the severity of cirrhosis, using the Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) classification.

Results

A total of 69 studies were included. Esomeprazole, omeprazole and rabeprazole were classified as having ‘no additional risks known’. A reduction in maximum dose of omeprazole and rabeprazole is recommended for CTP A and B patients. For patients with CTP C cirrhosis, the only PPI advised is esomeprazole at a maximum dosage of 20 mg per day. Pantoprazole and lansoprazole were classified as unsafe because of 4‐ to 8‐fold increased exposure. The use of PPIs in cirrhotic patients has been associated with the development of infections and hepatic encephalopathy and should be carefully considered.

Conclusions

We suggest using esomeprazole, omeprazole or rabeprazole in patients with CTP A or B cirrhosis and only esomeprazole in patients with CTP C. Pharmacokinetic changes are also important to consider when prescribing PPIs to vulnerable, cirrhotic patients.

A Prediction Model of Drug Exposure in Cirrhotic Patients According to Child-Pugh Classification

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Prediction of drug clearance in liver cirrhosis patients is currently based on in vitro-in vivo extrapolation and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models. No static model for this purpose has been described. The objectives of this study were to (1) derive a static model for predicting drug exposure in cirrhotic patients, and (2) to evaluate the model on a large set of published data.

METHODS

The impact of cirrhosis was characterized by the ratio of the total and unbound drug area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in cirrhotic patients to the AUC measured in healthy subjects These ratios were predicted for Child-Pugh classes A, B, and C. The AUC ratios observed in published data were compared with AUC ratios predicted by the model.

RESULTS

Among 171 drugs examined, 83 published AUC ratios for 45 drugs in cirrhotic patients were available for analysis. The mean ± standard deviation relative prediction error for the total and unbound AUC ratios was 0.22 ± 0.58 and 0.24 ± 0.56, respectively. There were four outliers among the 83 predicted values. Simulations showed that the prediction error was negligible provided that the hepatic extraction coefficient was less than 0.8.

CONCLUSIONS

For mild and moderate cirrhosis (classes A and B), the predicted unbound AUC ratio is typically approximately 2 and 3.5, respectively, for most drugs. In the absence of data in cirrhotic patients, the drug dose might be empirically reduced by these factors. In severe cirrhosis (class C), our model may help clinicians to adjust their prescriptions.

Liver hepatotoxicity associated with pantoprazole: a rare case report

Hepatotoxicity may occasionally develop over the course of treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Although skin reactions, interstitial nephritis, pancytopenia, anaphylaxis, and generalized edema have been reported to be associated with PPIs, hepatotoxicity associated with oral pantoprazole is very rare. In this report, we present a case of hepatotoxicity in a 35-year-old man who received pantoprazole (40 mg/day) for acute gastritis. One week after discontinuation of pantoprazole, his liver function began to improve, and the patient gradually fully recovered. Although this toxicity occurs only infrequently, pantoprazole should be considered as a rare hepatotoxic agent in the literature.

Increased rate of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis among cirrhotic patients receiving pharmacologic acid suppression

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with cirrhosis frequently receive proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or H2-receptor antagonist therapies. We investigated whether acid-suppressive therapy is associated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in cirrhotic patients with ascites.

METHODS

We compared data from 65 hospitalized cirrhotic patients with paracentesis-proven SBP, collected from 2006 to 2009, with those of 65 contemporaneous, hospitalized cirrhotic patients without SBP (controls). We evaluated PPI use and analyzed the effects of covariates.

RESULTS

Patients with SBP had a significantly higher incidence of recent (past 7 days) PPI use (71%) than controls (42%). Of patients with SBP, 68% had no documented indication for PPI therapy. Based on multivariable logistic regression analysis, subjects who had not taken PPIs in the past 90 days were almost 70% less likely to develop SBP than those who had taken PPIs in the previous 7 days. Subjects who took PPIs within 8 to 90 days before hospitalization were 79% less likely to develop SBP than those who took PPIs within 7 days before hospitalization. There was no significant difference between patients who received no PPI therapy in the previous 90 days versus those who had taken PPIs in the previous 8 to 90 days (P = .58). Hyponatremia was associated significantly with SBP. There were no significant differences in length of hospital stay or 30-day survival for the SBP and control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacologic acid suppression is associated with SBP in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Prospective studies are needed to determine the mechanism of this association and to determine whether reduced use of PPIs and H2-receptor antagonists reduce the incidence of SBP.

PPIs are not associated with a lower incidence of portal-hypertension-related bleeding in cirrhosis

AIM: To determine if proton pump inhibitor use in cirrhotic patients with endoscopic findings of portal hypertension is associated with a lower frequency of gastrointestinal bleeding.

METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis and endoscopic findings related to portal hypertension, receiving or not receiving proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, were included retrospectively. We assigned patients to two groups: group 1 patients underwent PPI therapy and group 2 patients did not undergo PPI therapy.

RESULTS: One hundred and five patients with a median age of 58 (26-87) years were included, 57 (54.3%) of which were women. Esophageal varices were found in 82 (78%) patients, portal hypertensive gastropathy in 72 (68.6%) patients, and gastric varices in 15 (14.3%) patients. PPI therapy was used in 45.5% of patients (n = 48). Seventeen (16.1%) patients presented with upper gastrointestinal bleeding; in 14/17 (82.3%) patients, bleeding was secondary to esophageal varices, and in 3/17 patients bleeding was attributed to portal hypertensive gastropathy. Bleeding related to portal hypertension according to PPI therapy occurred in 18.7% (n = 9) of group 1 and in 14% (n = 8) of group 2 (odds ratio: 0.83, 95% confidence interval: 0.5-1.3, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSION: Portal hypertension bleeding is not associated with PPI use. These findings do not support the prescription of PPIs in patients with chronic liver disease with no currently accepted indication.

Recent in vitro findings of negative inotropy of pantoprazole did not translate into clinically relevant effects on left ventricular function in healthy volunteers

PURPOSE

Reports on cardiac problems with oral proton pump inhibitors have caused extensive safety reviews by the US Food and Drug Administration. We provide additional data on acute cardiac effects of an intravenous application.

METHODS

Echocardiography was performed in 18 healthy volunteers after administration of a common high-dose regimen of pantoprazole (80 mg i.v. bolus followed by 8 mg/h for 1 h) or placebo.

DESIGN

The design included a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

RESULTS

Ejection fraction (%, mean +/- SE) in the treatment group (placebo group) was 60.7 +/- 1.1 (61.2 +/- 1.7) at baseline, and 62.6 +/- 1.1 (62.1 +/- 1.9), 64.7 +/- 1.6 (63.5 +/- 1.3), 62.6 +/- 1.6 (61.0 +/- 1.6) and 63.0 +/- 1.4 (61.8 +/- 1.5) at 7.5, 15, 30 and 60 min after bolus application, respectively (p = n.s.). Similarly, no significant changes were found for cardiac output, cardiac index, blood pressure and heart rate. In contrast, gastric pH that was used as a treatment control was significantly increased 60 min after the application of pantoprazole as compared to baseline and to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Pantoprazole as injection is safe in healthy subjects with respect to cardiac contractile function. However, in view of recent reports of negative inotropy of the drug, further studies in heart failure patients are required.

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous pantoprazole in paediatric intensive care patients

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

The use of intravenous pantoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, has been increasing in the paediatric intensive care unit. Despite this increased use, data on the disposition of intravenous pantoprazole in paediatric intensive care patients are very scarce.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

Our population approach has determined the pharmacokinetic parameters of intravenous pantoprazole in paediatric intensive care patients and the relative importance of factors influencing its disposition. Pantoprazole clearance was significantly influenced by developmental changes and by the presence of systemic inflammatory syndrome, hepatic dysfunction and CYP2C19 inhibitors.

AIMS

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of intravenous pantoprazole in a paediatric intensive care population and to determine the influence of demographic factors, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), hepatic dysfunction and concomitantly used CYP2C19 inducers and inhibitors on the drug's pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

A total of 156 pantoprazole concentration measurements from 20 patients (10 days to 16.4 years of age) at risk for or with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, who received pantoprazole doses ranging from 19.9 to 140.6 mg/1.73 m(2)/day, were analysed using a population pharmacokinetic approach (nonmem program).

RESULTS

The best structural model for pantoprazole was a two-compartment model with zero order infusion and first-order elimination. Body weight, SIRS, age, hepatic dysfunction and presence of CYP2C19 inhibitors were significant covariates affecting clearance (CL), accounting for 75% of interindividual variability. Only body weight significantly influenced central volume of distribution (V(c)). In the final population model, the estimated CL and V(c) were 5.28 l h(-1) and 2.22 l, respectively, for a typical 5-year-old child weighing 20 kg. Pantoprazole CL increased with weight and age, whereas the presence of SIRS, CYP2C19 inhibitors and hepatic dysfunction, when present separately, significantly decreased pantoprazole CL by 62.3, 65.8 and 50.5%, respectively. For patients aged between 6 months and 5 years without SIRS, CYP2C19 inhibitor or hepatic dysfunction, the predicted pantoprazole CL is faster than that reported in adults.

CONCLUSION

These results provide important information for physicians regarding selection of a starting dose and dosing regimens of pantoprazole for paediatric intensive care patients based on factors frequently encountered in this population.

Inadequate use of proton-pump inhibitors in patients with liver cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Patients with liver cirrhosis have a high prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms. The use of antiacid therapy (AAT) in these patients is unexplored. We aimed to assess the use of AAT in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

A total of 128 consecutive cirrhotic patients were evaluated for the use of and indications for acid-suppressive agents. Upper endoscopy findings and concomitant medications were registered. A validated questionnaire was used to measure the gastrointestinal symptom burden. Adequate indications for AAT were those strongly supported by the medical literature.

RESULTS

Forty percent (n=51) of patients with cirrhosis were on AAT. Thirty-seven percent (n=19) of these had adequate and 63% (n=32) inadequate indications for AAT. The major inadequate indication was previous variceal bleeding (34%). Patients with inadequate indications for AAT had increased severity of symptoms of indigestion compared with patients without AAT (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that inadequate use of AAT was independently related only to previous variceal bleeding and the number of concomitant medications.

CONCLUSION

AAT is used by a large proportion of patients with cirrhosis. In the majority, therapy is based on inadequate indications, mainly continuous long-term therapy after previous variceal bleeding. Patients with an inadequate indication for acid-suppressive medications have increased severity of symptoms of indigestion, indicating that gastrointestinal symptoms might be a factor contributing to proton-pump inhibitor consumption in these patients.

Negative inotropy of the gastric proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole in myocardium from humans and rabbits: evaluation of mechanisms

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors are used extensively for acid-related gastrointestinal diseases. Their effect on cardiac contractility has not been assessed directly.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Under physiological conditions (37 degrees C, pH 7.35, 1.25 mmol/L Ca2+), there was a dose-dependent decrease in contractile force in ventricular trabeculae isolated from end-stage failing human hearts superfused with pantoprazole. The concentration leading to 50% maximal response was 17.3+/-1.3 microg/mL. Similar observations were made in trabeculae from human atria, normal rabbit ventricles, and isolated rabbit ventricular myocytes. Real-time polymerase chain reaction demonstrated the expression of gastric H+/K+-adenosine triphosphatase in human and rabbit myocardium. However, measurements with BCECF-loaded rabbit trabeculae did not reveal any significant pantoprazole-dependent changes of pH(i). Ca2+ transients recorded from field-stimulated fluo 3-loaded myocytes (F/F0) were significantly depressed by 10.4+/-2.1% at 40 microg/mL. Intracellular Ca2+ fluxes were assessed in fura 2-loaded, voltage-clamped rabbit ventricular myocytes. Pantoprazole (40 microg/mL) caused an increase in diastolic [Ca2+]i by 33+/-12%, but peak systolic [Ca2+]i was unchanged, resulting in a decreased Ca2+ transient amplitude by 25+/-8%. The amplitude of the L-type Ca2+ current (I(Ca,L)) was reduced by 35+/-5%, and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ content was reduced by 18+/-6%. Measurements of oxalate-supported sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ uptake in permeabilized cardiomyocytes indicated that pantoprazole decreased Ca2+ sensitivity (Kd) of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ adenosine triphosphatase: control, Kd=358+/-15 nmol/L; 40 microg/mL pantoprazole, Kd=395+/-12 nmol/L (P<0.05). Pantoprazole also acted on cardiac myofilaments to reduced Ca2+-activated force.

CONCLUSIONS

Pantoprazole depresses cardiac contractility in vitro by depression of Ca2+ signaling and myofilament activity. In view of the extensive use of this agent, the effects should be evaluated in vivo.

Clinical pharmacological aspects of the proton pump inhibitor therapy – importance of pharmacogenetic differences in the clinical practice

A protonpumpa-gátlók (PPI) a gastrooesophagealis reflux és más savfüggő betegségek kezelésében széles körben használatosak. Az omeprazol, lansoprazol, pantoprazol, rabeprazol és esomeprazol hatékonyan gátolják a gyomorsav-szekréciót a protonpumpa, H + /K + -adenozin trifoszfatáz (ATPáz) bénításával.E vegyületek döntően CYP-mediált oxidatív metabolizmusában megfigyelhető különbségek kifejezett egyéni eltéréseket okozhatnak a savszekréció gátló hatásban. A PPI-kezelés során fellépő gyógyszerkölcsönhatások nagy része szintén e metabolikus folyamatokhoz köthető.A PPI-k átalakításában elsősorban a CYP2C19 és a CYP3A4 izoenzimek vesznek részt; aktivitásukat részben exogén hatások, részben endogén (farmakogenetikai) tényezők módosíthatják. Napjainkban elérhetővé vált az egyes genotípusok (homozigóta extenzív, heterozigóta extenzív metabolizálók és lassú metabolizálók) PCR, DNS chip módszerrel történő vizsgálata, mely egyre több magyarázattal szolgál a terápiás válaszokban megfigyelhető egyéni eltérések megértéséhez.A genotípus meghatározása a klinikai gyakorlat számára jelentős segítséget nyújthat az optimális kezelési forma kiválasztásában, és egyénre szabott savszekréció-gátló terápia kialakításában, különösen PPI-kezelésre non-responder gastrooesophagealis reflux, vagy fekélybetegség esetében, illetőleg sikertelen eradikációs kezelést követően.

Recent advances in the treatment of GERD in the elderly: focus on proton pump inhibitors

The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) increases with age, and older people are more likely to develop severe disease. Studies of elderly patients with GERD indicate differences in presentation and diagnosis, compared with GERD in younger adults. Indeed, an older patient with GERD may present with atypical symptoms such as dysphagia, vomiting, weight loss, anaemia and anorexia, and less frequently with typical symptoms such as heartburn or acid regurgitation. These findings are attributed to pathophysiological changes in esophageal function that occur with age. Therefore, GERD in elderly patients is more likely to be poorly diagnosed or undiagnosed. Although few studies have concentrated specifically on elderly patients, the proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to be more effective than histamine receptor antagonists for healing reflux esophagitis and for preventing its recurrence when they are given as maintenance therapy. In addition, the PPIs seem to be safe both in short- and in long-term therapy of elderly patients with GERD.

Pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors in children

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has become widespread in children and infants for the management of paediatric acid-related disease. Pharmacokinetic profiles of only omeprazole and lansoprazole have been well characterised in children over 2 years of age with acid-related diseases. Few data have been recently published regarding the pharmacokinetics of pantoprazole in children, and none are available for rabeprazole or esomeprazole. The metabolism of PPI enantiomers has never been studied in the paediatric population. A one-compartment model best describes the pharmacokinetic behaviour of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole in children, with important interindividual variability for each pharmacokinetic parameter. Like adults, PPIs are rapidly absorbed in children following oral administration; the mean time to reach maximum plasma concentration varies from 1 to 3 hours. Since these agents are acid labile, their oral formulations consist of capsules containing enteric-coated granules. No liquid formulation is available for any of the PPIs. Thus, for those patients unable to swallow capsules, extemporaneous liquid preparations for omeprazole and lansoprazole have been reported; however, neither the absolute nor the relative bioavailabilities of these oral formulations have been studied in children. Intravenous formulations are available for omeprazole (in Europe), lansoprazole and pantoprazole. PPIs are rapidly metabolised in children, with short elimination half-lives of around 1 hour, similar to that reported for adults. All PPIs are extensively metabolised by the liver, primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms CYP2C19 and CYP3A4, to inactive metabolites, with little unchanged drug excreted in the urine. Similar to that seen in adults, the absolute bioavailability of omeprazole increases with repeated dosing in children; this phenomenon is thought to be due to a combination of decreased first-pass elimination and reduced systemic clearance. The apparent clearance (CL/F) of omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole appears to be faster for children than for adults. A higher metabolic capacity in children as well as differences in the extent of PPI bioavailability are most likely responsible for this finding. This may partly account for the need in children for variable and sometimes considerably greater doses of PPIs, on a per kilogram basis, than for adults to achieve similar plasma concentrations. Furthermore, no studies have been able to demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between age and pharmacokinetic parameters among children. Despite the small number of very young infants studied, there is some evidence for reduced PPI metabolism in newborns. The limited paediatric data regarding the impact of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on PPI metabolism are similar to those reported for adults, with poor metabolisers having 6- to 10-fold higher area under the concentration-time curve values compared with extensive metabolisers. Finally, because a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship exists for PPIs, the significant interindividual variability in their disposition may partly explain the wide range of therapeutic doses used in children. Further studies are needed to better define the pharmacokinetics of PPIs in children <2 years of age.

Pantoprazole: an update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the management of acid-related disorders

Pantoprazole (Protonix) is an irreversible proton pump inhibitor (PPI) that reduces gastric acid secretion. In combination with two antimicrobial agents (most commonly metronidazole, clarithromycin or amoxicillin) for 6-14 days, pantoprazole 40 mg twice daily produced Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of 71-93.8% (intent-to-treat [ITT] or modified ITT analysis) in patients without known antibacterial resistance. Pantoprazole-containing triple therapy was at least as effective as omeprazole- and similar in efficacy to lansoprazole-containing triple therapy in large trials. In the treatment of moderate to severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), oral pantoprazole 40 mg/day was as effective as other PPIs (omeprazole, omeprazole multiple unit pellet system, lansoprazole and esomeprazole) and significantly more effective than histamine H(2)-antagonists. Pantoprazole 20 mg/day provided effective mucosal healing in patients with GORD and mild oesophagitis. Intravenous pantoprazole 40 mg/day can be used in patients who are unable to take oral medication. Oral pantoprazole 20-40 mg/day for up to 24 months prevented relapse in most patients with healed GORD. According to preliminary data, oral pantoprazole 20 or 40 mg/day was effective at healing and preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related ulcers, and intravenous pantoprazole was at least as effective as intravenous ranitidine in preventing ulcer rebleeding after endoscopic haemostasis. Oral or intravenous pantoprazole up to 240 mg/day maintained target acid output levels in most patients with hypersecretory conditions, including Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. Oral and intravenous pantoprazole appear to be well tolerated in patients with acid-related disorders in short- and long-term trials. Tolerability with oral pantoprazole was similar to that with other PPIs or histamine H(2)-antagonists in short-term trials. Formal drug interaction studies have not revealed any clinically significant interactions between pantoprazole and other agents. In conclusion, pantoprazole is an effective agent in the management of acid-related disorders. As a component of triple therapy for H. pylori eradication and as monotherapy for the healing of oesophagitis and maintenance of GORD, pantoprazole has shown similar efficacy to other PPIs and greater efficacy than histamine H(2)-antagonists. Limited data suggest that it is also effective in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and in preventing ulcer rebleeding. Pantoprazole is well tolerated with minimal potential for drug interactions. The availability of pantoprazole as both oral and intravenous formulations provides flexibility when the oral route of administration is not appropriate. Thus, pantoprazole is a valuable alternative to other PPIs in the treatment of acid-related disorders.

Pharmacotherapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children: focus on safety

Gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR) disease is very common and, in the majority of infants, is physiological. However, untreated GOR disease in infants and children is associated with a decrease in quality of life for the child and their parents. It may also cause sometimes more severe complications, such as oesophagitis, and causing, in rare cases, failure to thrive, oesophageal stricture, apnoea and even death. Every therapeutic intervention (non-drug treatment, medical treatment and surgery) is associated with morbidity and even mortality. Moreover, efficacy data of many medications in children are non-existing, limited or disappointing. The safety profile of cisapride is comparable to that of other therapeutic interventions or to the risk of non-treatment. Therefore, the therapeutic approach of GOR disease in infants and children needs to be well-balanced, considering therapeutic efficacy and side effects. This review will focus on the side effects of the different therapeutic options.