Pharmacokinetics of loratadine and pseudoephedrine following single and multiple doses of once- versus twice-daily combination tablet formulations in healthy adult males

Application of the Gastrointestinal Simulator (GIS) Coupled with In Silico Modeling to Measure the Impact of Coca-Cola® on the Luminal and Systemic Behavior of Loratadine (BCS Class 2b)

In the present work, we explored if Coca-Cola^® had a beneficial impact on the systemic outcome of the weakly basic drug loratadine (Wal-itin^®, immediate-release formulation, 10 mg, generic drug product). To map the contribution of underlying physiological variables that may positively impact the intestinal absorption of loratadine, a multi-compartmental and dynamic dissolution device was built, namely the Gastrointestinal Simulator (GIS). The luminal behavior of one immediate-release (IR) tablet of 10 mg of loratadine was tested under four different fasted state test conditions in the GIS: (i) with 250 mL of water and applying a predetermined gastric half-life (t_1/2,G) of 15 min; (ii) with 250 mL of water and applying a t_1/2,G of 30 min; (iii) with 250 mL of Coca-Cola^® and a t_1/2,G of 15 min; (iv) with 250 mL of Coca-Cola^® and a t_1/2,G of 30 min. After initiating the experiments, solution concentrations and solubility were measured in the withdrawn samples, and pH was monitored. To address the impact of the present CO₂ in Coca-Cola^® on the disintegration time of the tablet, additional disintegration experiments were performed in a single-vessel applying tap water and sparkling water as dissolution media. These experiments demonstrated the faster disintegration of the tablet in the presence of sparkling water, as the present CO₂ facilitates the release of the drug. The buffer capacity of Coca-Cola^® in the presence of FaSSGF was 4-fold higher than the buffer capacity of tap water in the presence of FaSSGF. After performing the in vitro experiments, the obtained results were used as input for a two-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling approach to predict the systemic concentrations. These simulations pointed out that (i) the present CO₂ in Coca-Cola^® is responsible for the enhancement in drug release and dissolution and that (ii) a delay in gastric emptying rate will sustain the supersaturated concentrations of loratadine in the intestinal regions of the GI tract, resulting in an enhanced driving force for intestinal absorption. Therefore, co-administration of loratadine with Coca-Cola^® will highly likely result in an increased systemic exposure compared to co-administration of loratadine with tap water. The mechanistic insights that were obtained from this work will serve as a scientific basis to evaluate the impact of Coca-Cola^® on the systemic exposure of weakly basic drugs for patients on acid-reducing agents in future work.

Simultaneous determination of loratadine and pseudoephedrine sulfate in human plasma by liquid chromatography–electrospray mass spectrometry for pharmacokinetic studies

To support the pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of an extended-release loratadine (LOR)/pseudoephedrine sulfate (PES) tablet, a high performance liquid chromatographic-electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometric method (LC-MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of LOR and PES in human plasma. Diazepam (DP) and phenylpropanolamine (PPA) were used as internal standards for LOR and PES, respectively. Analytes were extracted from alkalized human plasma by liquid/liquid extraction using ethyl ether. Chromatographic separation was performed on an ODS column at flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The total chromatographic run time was 10.5 min with the retention time of 7.1 min and 6.2 min for LOR and DP, respectively, and 2.2 min for both of PES and PPA. The LOQ was 10 pg/ml and 50 pg/ml for LOR and PES, respectively. The method is accurate and precise enough for its intended purpose.

Second-Generation Antihistamines

Antihistamines are useful medications for the treatment of a variety of allergic disorders. Second-generation antihistamines avidly and selectively bind to peripheral histamine H1 receptors and, consequently, provide gratifying relief of histamine-mediated symptoms in a majority of atopic patients. This tight receptor specificity additionally leads to few effects on other neuronal or hormonal systems, with the result that adverse effects associated with these medications, with the exception of noticeable sedation in about 10% of cetirizine-treated patients, resemble those of placebo overall. Similarly, serious adverse drug reactions and interactions are uncommon with these medicines. Therapeutic interchange to one of the available second-generation antihistamines is a reasonable approach to limiting an institutional formulary, and adoption of such a policy has proven capable of creating substantial cost savings. Differences in overall efficacy and safety between available second-generation antihistamines, when administered in equivalent dosages, are not large. However, among the antihistamines presently available, fexofenadine may offer the best overall balance of effectiveness and safety, and this agent is an appropriate selection for initial or switch therapy for most patients with mild or moderate allergic symptoms. Cetirizine is the most potent antihistamine available and has been subjected to more clinical study than any other. This agent is appropriate for patients proven unresponsive to other antihistamines and for those with the most severe symptoms who might benefit from antihistamine treatment of the highest potency that can be dose-titrated up to maximal intensity.

Pharmacokinetic properties of single-dose loratadine and ambroxol alone and combined in tablet formulations in healthy men

BACKGROUND

Due to Mexico's complicated socioeconomic environment, causing a high occurrence of >1 person sharing a single room, respiratory conditions are spread easily. Respiratory conditions are the main reason for consultation with a physician. The most frequent symptoms are throat soreness and cough; therefore, a new formulation combining loratadine and ambroxol hydrochloride was designed to treat these 2 major symptoms. The combination is expected to provide relief when coprescribed with more specific therapies, such as antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE

This study determined the pharmacokinetic profile of single-dose loratadine-ambroxol hydrochloride combination therapy versus each component given separately. The analyses included descarboethoxyloratadine (DCL), the primary active metabolite of loratadine.

METHODS

This was a 4-week, single-center, randomized, open-label, 3-period crossover study in adult male volunteers aged 18 to 50 years and in good general health. Subjects were randomized to receive single doses of treatment A (2 loratadine 5-mg tablets + ambroxol 30-mg tablets), B (2 ambroxol 30-mg tablets), or C (1 loratadine 10-mg tablet) in 1 of 3 sequences (ABC, BCA, or CAB) per period. A 14-day washout period separated each treatment period. Plasma concentration-time data curves for each subject and treatment were analyzed by noncompart-mental methods to obtain values for area under the curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), and time to reach C(max) (T(max)).

RESULTS

Thirty subjects (mean [SD] age, 22.5 [2.6] years) were enrolled. All treatments were well tolerated. Formulations A and C produced similar loratadine and DCL AUC from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24)) values, but showed slightly high C(max). values for loratadine and slightly low C(max) values for DCL, indicating failure to demonstrate bioinequivalence. Formulations A and B produced similar ambroxol C(max), T(max), and AUC(0-24) values.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population of healthy mate volunteers, results showed the bioavailability of loratadine and ambroxol from the new formulation and did not show impairment of absorption when the drugs were formulated in a combination tablet.