A Further Look at Youth Intellectual Giftedness and its Correlates: Values, Interests, Performance, and Behavior

Math self-concept in the transition to secondary school: Developmental trends, predictors, and educational implications among high-ability and average-ability students

This study examined the development of math self-concept during the transition to secondary school comparatively among high-ability and average-ability students in a largescale longitudinal sample in Flanders, Belgium (N = 5740 students; 49.5% males). Latent change models revealed that high-ability students, although maintaining higher relative levels of math self-concept, experienced steeper levels of math self-concept decline in the transition to secondary school than their average-ability peers, according to students' reports. Cognitive ability, measured with standardized intelligence tests, predicted steeper math self-concept decline within both ability groups, and in both groups stronger math self-concept decline was associated with (a) higher levels of teacher-reported underachievement in Grade 7 (r2 = 0.13, p < .001), (b) lower standardized math achievement in Grade 11 (r2 = 0.49, p < .001), (c) lower student-reported school well-being in Grade 7 (r2 = 0.13, p < .001) and Grade 11 (r2 = 0.04, p < .001), and (d) higher risk of grade repetition by the end of secondary school (r2 = 0.11, p < .001). These findings establish that the level of math self-concept and the degree in decline in math self-concept can have negative implications for educational outcomes, even when math self-concept level remains high relative to peers.

Non-Cognitive Specificities of Intellectually Gifted Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of the Literature

For several years, there was a growing interest in intellectual giftedness and in particular in the non-cognitive specificities of gifted individuals. This topic attracted much public attention and sometimes led to contradictions with the scientific literature. The current review synthesizes a broad set of results related to non-cognitive specificities of intellectual gifted in children and adolescents. This synthesis of scientific research on giftedness and its associated non-cognitive features does not support the conclusion that there is a stable profile across gifted individuals that would consistently separate them from non-gifted individuals. A few specificities in some areas are noted, but they are not necessarily being systematic. These specificities often turn out to be in favor of gifted youth, contrary to the view sometimes defended in the general public that gifted individuals suffer from major everyday difficulties. Finally, methodological issues are listed regarding the designs of existing studies, with recommendations for future research in the field.

Examining the Relationships among Cognitive Ability, Domain-Specific Self-Concept, and Behavioral Self-Esteem of Gifted Children Aged 5-6 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study

Although childhood is a critical period of development during which all children begin a lifelong process of self-discovery that shapes their identities, few studies have focused on the self-concept and self-esteem of young, gifted children. This study recruited 108 gifted children aged 5–6 years from Greece and their preschool teachers to explore the relationships among cognitive ability, domain-specific self-concepts, and global self-esteem. The Pictorial Scale for Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance was used to assess the domain-specific self-concepts of the participants, whereas behavioral manifestations of self-esteem were rated by the children’s teachers using the Behavioral Academic Self-Esteem Scale. There were positive correlations among IQ, perceived scholastic competence, and global self-esteem. Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that significant predictors of global self-esteem were male gender, higher IQ, perceived scholastic competence, and perceived maternal acceptance. Additionally, there were gender differences in global self-esteem and perceived physical competence in favor of boys, whereas perceived maternal acceptance favored girls. This article discusses the need for practitioners working with gifted children to enact a comprehensive social–emotional learning curriculum in schools that promotes academic as well as personal and character strengths. Finally, the limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are also presented.

High-Ability Grouping: Benefits for Gifted Students' Achievement Development Without Costs in Academic Self-Concept

Effects of full-time ability grouping on students' academic self-concept (ASC) and mathematics achievement were investigated in the first 3 years of secondary school (four waves of measurement; students' average age at first wave: 10.5 years). Students were primarily from middle and upper class families living in southern Germany. The study sample comprised 148 (60% male) students from 14 gifted classes and 148 (57% male) students from 25 regular classes (matched by propensity score matching). Data analyses involved multilevel and latent growth curve analyses. Findings revealed no evidence for contrast effects of class-average achievement or assimilation effects of class type on students' ASC. ASC remained stable over time. Students in gifted classes showed higher achievement gains than students in regular classes.

The Mad Genius Stereotype: Still Alive and Well

Scientists and laypeople agree on high ability as a defining feature of giftedness. Yet their views on gifted people's socioemotional characteristics diverge. Most studies find the gifted to be similar or slightly superior to average-ability persons in these domains (“harmony hypothesis”). However, subjective conceptions and media representations, most of which have focused on gifted children and youth, stress the socioemotional downsides of giftedness (“disharmony hypothesis”), affecting highly able individuals and those around them, thus hampering individual development. To date, most studies on gifted stereotypes have examined selective samples, mostly teachers. The present study is the first to provide representative data on conceptions of gifted individuals in general. A brief survey of 1029 German adults assessed quality and prevalence of stereotypes about gifted individuals, without an explicit focus on children and/or adolescents. Latent class analysis (LCA) revealed two conceptions of giftedness, with twice as many “disharmonious” than “harmonious” raters. Male gender, single parenthood, unemployment, higher income or negative attitudes toward the gifted predicted disharmonious ratings. However, effects were small, suggesting future studies look deeper into the processes of stereotype formation and maintenance.

Entwicklung und Schwerpunkte in der psychologischen Hochbegabungsforschung

Zusammenfassung. Auf der Grundlage einer quantitativen szientometrischen Analyse der deutsch- und englischsprachigen Publikationen zum Thema Hochbegabung aus den deutschsprachigen Ländern (PSYNDEX) und der Publikationen aus den primär angloamerikanischen Ländern (PsycINFO) analysieren wir Entwicklung und Schwerpunkte der psychologischen Hochbegabungsforschung von 1980 bis 2014. Im Vergleich liegt die Anzahl dieser Publikationen (PSYNDEX: 1.066; PsycINFO: 8.572) bei einem Fünftel der Menge zum Thema Geistige Behinderung / Intellektuelle Entwicklungsstörung. Die Gesamtmenge an Publikationen zu Hochbegabung zeigt in beiden Datenbanken einen Boom in den 1980er Jahren sowie seit 2000 einen erneuten deutlichen Zuwachs. Der Anteil empirischer Arbeiten fällt mit 38 % nach PSYNDEX im internationalen Vergleich (54 % nach PsycINFO) geringer aus und ist seit 2000 eher konstant, während er bei englischsprachigen Publikationen leicht ansteigt. Circa 80 % aller Publikationen beschäftigen sich mit Hochbegabten im Schulalter (6 – 17 Jahre), während das Vorschul- sowie das Erwachsenenalter wenig Berücksichtigung finden. Die Publikationen fokussieren vor allem allgemein kognitive, schulische, mathematische, sportliche und musikalische Fähigkeiten, während sich nur wenige bis gar keine Publikationen zu z. B. kreativer, verbaler, nonverbaler oder figural-räumlicher Hochbegabung finden. Implikationen für die Hochbegabungsforschung werden diskutiert.

Are gifted adolescents more satisfied with their lives than their non-gifted peers?

Studies investigating the life satisfaction of intellectually gifted and non-gifted students are scarce and often suffer from methodological shortcomings. We examined the life satisfaction of gifted and non-gifted adolescents using a rather unselected sample of N = 655 German high-school students (n = 75 gifted), adequate comparison groups of non-gifted students, and a clear definition of giftedness (general intelligence g > 2 SD above the mean). There was no difference in life satisfaction between gifted and non-gifted adolescents (d < |0.1|). Girls reported somewhat lower life satisfaction scores than boys (d = 0.24). However, this result was not specific to giftedness but was instead found across the entire sample. Thus, gifted girls were not found to be especially unsatisfied with their lives. Our findings support previous research showing that giftedness is not a risk factor for impaired psycho-social well-being of boys or girls.