A prospective evaluation of alcohol-assisted versus mechanical epithelial removal before photorefractive keratectomy

Comparison of Postoperative Symptoms of Alcohol-Assisted Versus Mechanical Epithelial Removal in Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Contralateral Double Blind Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term complaints of postoperative pain, and other ocular discomfort symptoms in patients who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with alcohol-assisted epithelial removal in one eye versus mechanical debridement in the other eye.

METHOD

A prospective, interventional, contralateral double blind clinical trial was performed on 164 eyes of 82 candidates of PRK surgery. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group was alcohol-assisted PRK group in which the epithelial removal was performed on their right eye. The second group was mechanical PRK group in which epithelial removal was performed on their left eye. A numerical rating scale was given to the patients to describe the severity of postoperative pain on the first day following PRK. Postoperative discomfort symptoms including the complaints of light sensitivity, tearing, blurring, and foreign body sensation was also provided by the survey form.

RESULTS

One day following PRK, the mean pain score of the alcohol-assisted PRK group and the mechanical PRK group was 3.4±3.1 and 4.1±3.3, respectively (P=0.019). The highest scores recorded for alcohol-assisted and mechanical treated groups were burning (5.22) and light sensitivity (5.46), respectively. Sixty-eight (82.9%) of all patients experienced postoperative pain, and in 52 (76.5%) of them, the time of pain onset was less than 2 hrs.

CONCLUSION

We found less pain and discomfort using alcohol-assisted technique compared with mechanical epithelial removal that was provided by a detailed pain and ocular discomfort symptoms assessment one day following PRK surgery.

Ocular chemical burn associated with gel type alcohol-based hand sanitizer: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS) are widely used for hand hygiene due to the coronavirus disease pandemic. However, risk awareness regarding its adverse effects is lacking. We aim to report a case of ocular chemical burn that showed severe clinical presentation associated with ABHS.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 5-year-old girl presented with severe left eye pain after 62% gel-type ABHS splashed into her eye.

DIAGNOSIS

On slit lamp examination, a near total corneal and conjunctival epithelial defect with limbal pale on the lower half of the cornea was noted. Severe ocular burn by ABHS was prominent with suspected limbal stem cell damage.

INTERVENTIONS

She was hospitalized and was prescribed topical medications including antibiotics, steroid eye drops with preservative-free artificial tears, and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

OUTCOMES

Despite intensive medical treatments, the corneal and conjunctival epithelial defects showed no improvement up to the 4th hospital day. After additional instillation of autoserum eye drops to promote epithelial healing, the corneal epithelium barely recovered from the temporal limbus. On the third week of admission, the epithelial defect was completely resolved without corneal opacity, although with minimal symblepharon in the lower fornix.

CONCLUSIONS

Gel-type ABHS can cause severe form of ocular chemical burn such as delayed ocular surface healing. In clinical setting, immediate and thorough rinsing of alcohol-based gel and early intensive treatment are crucial.

Comparison of ocular discomfort after three different epithelial debridement techniques for corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus treatment

Purpose

To compare the severity and duration of ocular discomfort after three different epithelial debridement techniques for corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of keratoconus.

Methods

Fifty-five patients (65 eyes) known to have keratoconus were enrolled in this retrospective study. The eyes were divided into three groups based on the technique used for epithelial debridement for corneal collagen cross-linking procedure; excimer laser transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy was used in group 1 (18 eyes), alcohol-assisted epithelial removal was used in group 2 (27 eyes), and mechanical epithelial debridement was used in group 3 (20 eyes). Preoperative and postoperative (third month) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using Snellen chart, objective refraction, and keratometry results were recorded. The results of the questionnaire obtained from the patient's medical records were reviewed regarding their subjective evaluation of postoperative symptoms including foreign body sensation, tearing, photophobia, and burning at the end of the first postoperative week. Paired-samples t test was used to compare preoperative and postoperative clinical findings. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the differences between three independent groups.

Results

BCVA improved from 0.51 ± 0.27 to 0.58 ± 0.21 (p = 0.05). Objective mean spherical and cylindrical refraction decreased from -5.08 ± 2.78D to -4.46 ± 2.91D (p = 0.22) and from -3.45 ± 2.73D to -3.03 ± 1.97D (p = 0.25). Mean maximum keratometry reading (K _max) decreased from 57.63 ± 4.73D to 56.13 ± 4.47D (p = 0.001). The mean score for foreign body sensation was the highest in group 3 (4.50 ± 0.53) and the lowest in group 1 (2.10 ± 1.85) (p = 0.01). The mean scores for tearing, photophobia, and burning sensation were comparable in three groups (p = 0.84, p = 0.13, and p = 0.61, respectively). The duration of photophobia was the shortest in group 1 (1.50 ± 2.37 days), followed by group 3 (2.00 ± 1.31 days) and group 2 (4.00 ± 1.83 days) (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

The severity and duration of adverse subjective symptoms during the first postoperative week after corneal collagen cross-linking appear to be milder with epithelial debridement using excimer laser transepithelial technique compared with -assisted debridement and mechanical debridement.

Topical use of alcohol in ophthalmology - Diagnostic and therapeutic indications

Alcohol (ethanol) has been used in medicine since time immemorial. In ophthalmic practice, besides as an antiseptic, it was given as retrobulbar injections to relieve severe ocular pain. Alcohol can be applied topically to the surface of neoplastic or suspicious lesions to kill cells that might desquamate and seed during surgical excision, to treat epithelial ingrowth that can occur following corneal surgeries, particularly laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and to treat superficial infectious keratitis. In view of its ability to achieve a smooth cleavage plane between the epithelium and the Bowman's layer, alcohol-assisted delamination (ALD) of the corneal epithelium has been used widely and effectively for a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic indications, at times delivering both outcomes. Diagnostically, ALD yields an intact epithelial sheet which can be fixed flat to provide excellent orientation for histopathological evaluation. Therapeutically, it is most commonly used to treat recurrent corneal erosion syndrome, where its efficacy is comparable to that of phototherapeutic keratectomy but with several advantages. It has also been used to treat various forms of epithelial/anterior stromal dystrophies, which can obviate or delay the need for corneal transplantation for several years. In addition, ALD is performed in corneal collagen cross-linking and corneal refractive surgery for relatively atraumatic removal of the epithelium. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic use of topical alcohol in ophthalmology, to describe the surgical and fixation techniques of ALD, and to highlight our experience in ALD over the past decade.

The Effectiveness of Corneal Epithelial Debridement Performed with an Alcohol-Impregnated Sponge

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent corneal surgery with debridement of epithelium by localised application of an alcohol-impregnated sponge instead of the usual alcohol reservoir method.

DESIGN

This study retrospectively included 52 eyes of 27 patients who underwent LASEK (laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy) and CXL (cross-linking) surgery after application of this alcohol-assisted debridement method between January 2019 and April 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-four patients who underwent LASEK and three patients who underwent CXL surgery were included in this study, which comprised a total of 52 eye operations.

METHODS

Epithelial debridement was performed after placing a 20% ethanol-impregnated sponge on the cornea for 20 seconds.

RESULTS

The mean pachymetry value was 509.40 ± 30.37 µm, the mean preoperative spherical equivalent was - 2.14 ± 1.02 dioptres, and the highest myopia and astigmatism values were - 4.25 dioptres and - 2.75 dioptres, respectively. It was seen that the corneal epithelium was completely and easily debrided in a size identical to that of the applied sponge.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete debridement of the corneal epithelium can be performed quickly, safely, and easily with this specially prepared sponge.

A Critical Overview of the Biological Effects of Mitomycin C Application on the Cornea Following Refractive Surgery

During the last 2 decades, modifying the shape of the cornea by means of laser photoablation has emerged as a successful and popular treatment option for refractive errors. Corneal surface ablation techniques such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) offer good refractive results while having a minimal impact on corneal biomechanical stability. Past limitations of these techniques included the long-term regression of refractive outcome and a vigorous healing response that reduced corneal clarity in some patients (giving rise to what is clinically described as “haze”). Mitomycin C (MMC) was introduced as a healing modulator and applied on the corneal surface after refractive surgery to address these drawbacks. This article critically reviews the available evidence on the biological effects, safety, and clinical benefits of the off-label use of MMC in corneal refractive surgery.

Comparison between Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy versus Alcohol-Assisted Photorefractive Keratectomy in Correction of Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism

Purpose

The aim of the study was to compare visual acuity, refractive results, safety, and efficacy of TPRK with AAPRK as primary outcomes and surgical time, pain scores, haze levels, and healing time as secondary outcomes in TPRK and AAPRK groups.

Setting

Security Forces Hospital, Ophthalmology Department, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Design

Prospective, nonrandomized case-control comparative study.

Methods

A total of 200 eyes of 100 consecutive patients were included. One hundred eyes underwent TPRK in the right eye (study group), and 100 eyes underwent AAPRK in the left eye (control group). Ablations were performed with the Schwind Amaris excimer LASER750S. Clinical outcomes during 6 months' follow-up were compared.

Results

The mean age of patients was 28.3 ± 6.3, 77 were females and 23 males. The mean surgical time was 162.17 ±  14.827 s and 243.24  ±  98.69 s, respectively. At day 1, the UDVA mean was 0.7 in 87% of eyes in the TPRK group while it was 0.5 in 45% of eyes in AAPRK; at week 1, it was 0.9 in 88% of eyes in the TPRK group and 0.6 in 60% of eyes in AAPRK. The mean pain scores were less and lower incidence of corneal haze in the TPRK. Complete epithelial healing time was shorter in TPRK, 3.20 ± 0.686 and 4.60 ± 1.969 days, respectively.

Conclusions

TPRK and AAPRK produce similar results 6 months postoperatively. However, in the early postoperative period, there were significant differences in UDVA, pain score, level of haze, and complete epithelial healing time. The pain scores were lower, level of haze was less, and healing time was shorter in the TPRK group which provided patient better felling and comfort in this period. Both of procedures are effective and safe for correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism. This trial is registered with NCT03569423.

Cyclodextrin Enhances Corneal Tolerability and Reduces Ocular Toxicity Caused by Diclofenac

With advances in refractive surgery and demand for cataract removal and lens replacement, the ocular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has increased. One of the most commonly used NSAIDs is diclofenac (Diclo). In this study, cyclodextrins (CDs), α-, β-, γ-, and HP-β-CDs, were investigated with in vitro irritation and in vivo ulceration models in rabbits to reduce Diclo toxicity. Diclo-, α-, β-, γ-, and HP-β-CD inclusion complexes were prepared and characterized and Diclo-CD complexes were evaluated for corneal permeation, red blood cell (RBCs) haemolysis, corneal opacity/permeability, and toxicity. Guest- (Diclo-) host (CD) solid inclusion complexes were formed only with β-, γ-, and HP-β-CDs. Amphipathic properties for Diclo were recorded and this surfactant-like functionality might contribute to the unwanted effects of Diclo on the surface of the eye. Contact angle and spreading coefficients were used to assess Diclo-CDs in solution. Reduction of ocular toxicity 3-fold to16-fold and comparable corneal permeability to free Diclo were recorded only with Diclo-γ-CD and Diclo-HP-β-CD complexes. These two complexes showed faster healing rates without scar formation compared with exposure to the Diclo solution and to untreated groups. This study also highlighted that Diclo-γ-CD and Diclo-HP-β-CD demonstrated fast healing without scar formation.

Single-Step Transepithelial PRK vs Alcohol-Assisted PRK in Myopia and Compound Myopic Astigmatism Correction

Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (tPRK), where both the epithelium and stroma are removed in a single-step, is a relatively new procedure of laser refractive error correction. This study compares the 3-month results of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism correction by tPRK or conventional alcohol-assisted PRK (aaPRK).This prospective, nonrandomized, case-control study recruited 148 consecutive patients; 93 underwent tPRK (173 eyes) and 55 aaPRK (103 eyes). Refractive results, predictability, safety, and efficacy were evaluated during the 3-month follow-up. The main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE).Mean preoperative MRSE was -4.30 ± 1.72 D and -4.33 ± 1.96 D, respectively (P = 0.87). The 3-month follow-up rate was 82.1% in the tPRK group (n = 145) and 86.4% in aaPRK group (n = 90), P = 0.81. Postoperative UDVA was 20/20 or better in 97% and 94% of eyes, respectively (P = 0.45). In the tPRK and aaPRK groups, respectively, 13% and 21% of eyes lost 1 line of CDVA, and 30% and 31% gained 1 or 2 lines (P = 0.48). Mean postoperative MRSE was -0.14 ± 0.26 D in the tPRK group and -0.12 ± 0.20 D in the aaPRK group (P = 0.9). The correlation between attempted versus achieved MRSE was equally high in both groups.Single-step transepithelial PRK and conventional PRK provide very similar results 3 months postoperatively. These procedures are predictable, effective, and safe for correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism.

Long term results of no-alcohol laser epithelial keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia

AIM

To evaluate the long term clinical results of mechanical no-alcohol-assisted laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) versus standard photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for low-moderate myopia.

METHODS

Twenty-five eyes treated with LASEK and twenty-five eyes treated with PRK were evaluated with a mean follow-up duration of 60mo. Mechanical separation of the epithelium was performed with blunt spatula and without application of alcohol. Laser ablation was performed with the MEL-70 excimer laser. All patients were examined daily until epithelial closure; at 1, 3, 6, and 12mo, and every year subsequently. Main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, haze, efficacy and safety indexes.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eyes and 22 eyes completed follow-up of 60mo in LASEK and PRK group respectively. Manifest refraction at 60mo follow-up was -0.01 and 0.26 in LASEK and PRK group respectively. In the LASEK group mean UDVA and mean CDVA after 60mo were 20/22 and 20/20 respectively (P>0.01). In the PRK group mean UDVA and mean CDVA at 60mo follow-up were 20/20 and 20/20 after 60mo (P>0.01). The efficacy indexes were 0.87 and 0.95, and the safety indexes were 1.25 and 1.4 respectively for LASEK group and PRK group.

CONCLUSION

Both standard PRK and no-alcohol LASEK offer safe and effective correction of low-moderate myopia in the long term without any statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Safety and Efficacy of Epi-Bowman Keratectomy in Photorefractive Keratectomy and Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Epi-Bowman Keratectomy (EBK) using Epi-clear™ epikeratome with a mechanical scraper for corneal epithelium debridement during photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL).

METHODOLOGY

Sixty eyes of 30 patients undergoing PRK and 44 eyes of 44 patients undergoing CXL were included in this study. In the PRK group, one eye of each patient underwent EBK and the other eye epithelial debridement with a mechanical scraper. In the CXL group, 22 eyes of 22 patients underwent EBK and the other 22 eyes with a mechanical scraping to remove the epithelium. Intra-operative spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT; Bioptigen Inc, Durham, NC) was performed to evaluate the integrity of Bowman's membrane following epithelial removal. The time taken for epithelial removal, post-operative pain score using the Wong-Baker's pain scale, time for epithelial healing, and the epithelial profile using the Optovue (Optovue Inc. Fremont, CA) during the healing was observed and analyzed between the two groups and subgroups.

RESULTS

Intra-operative SD OCT showed a smooth and undamaged Bowman's membrane when EBK was performed. Post-operative pain was significantly less (p < 0.01 in the PRK group and p < 0.001 in the CXL group) with faster epithelial healing (p < 0.001 in the PRK group and p < 0.0001 in the CXL group) in the EBK subgroup as compared with the mechanical scraper subgroup. Epithelial profiling during the healing phase showed an edematous epithelium in the initial 2 weeks in the mechanical scraper subgroup while the EBK subgroup showed minimal epithelial edema lasting up to a week with regularized and smooth corneal epithelium healing.

CONCLUSION

Epi-Bowman Keratectomy appears to be an effective and safe method of corneal epithelial debridement with negligible damage to Bowman's membrane and the surrounding epithelium leading to early healing thereby reducing the post-operative pain and complications.

Spectral OCT with speckle contrast reduction for evaluation of the healing process after PRK and transepithelial PRK

We evaluate Spectral OCT (SOCT) with a speckle contrast reduction technique using resonant scanner for assessment of corneal surface changes after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and we compare healing process between conventional PRK and transepithelial PRK. The measurements were performed before and after the surgery. Obtained results show that SOCT with a resonant scanner speckle contrast reduction is capable of providing information regarding the healing process after PRK. The main difference between the healing processes of PRK and TransPRK, assessed by SOCT, was the time to cover the stroma with epithelium, which was shorter in the TransPRK group.

Coenzyme Q10 rescues ethanol-induced corneal fibroblast apoptosis through the inhibition of caspase-2 activation

Recent studies indicate that caspase-2 is involved in the early stages of apoptosis, particularly before the occurrence of mitochondrial damage. Here we report the important role of the coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) on the activity of caspase-2 upstream of mitochondria in ethanol (EtOH)-treated corneal fibroblasts. After EtOH exposure, cells produce excessive reactive oxygen species formation, p53 expression, and most importantly, caspase-2 activation. After the activation of the caspase-2, the cells exhibited hallmarks of apoptotic pathway, such as mitochondrial damage and translocation of Bax and cytochrome c, which were then followed by caspase-3 activation. By pretreating the cells with a cell-permeable, biotinylated pan-caspase inhibitor, we identified caspase-2 as an initiator caspase in EtOH-treated corneal fibroblasts. Loss of caspase-2 inhibited EtOH-induced apoptosis. We further found that caspase-2 acts upstream of mitochondria to mediate EtOH-induced apoptosis. The loss of caspase-2 significantly inhibited EtOH-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, Bax translocation, and cytochrome c release from mitochondria. The pretreatment of CoQ10 prevented EtOH-induced caspase-2 activation and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. Our data demonstrated that by blocking caspase-2 activity, CoQ10 can protect the cells from mitochondrial membrane change, apoptotic protein translocation, and apoptosis. Taken together, EtOH-induced mitochondria-mediated apoptosis is initiated by caspase-2 activation, which is regulated by CoQ10.

Mechanical versus alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement during photorefractive keratectomy: a confocal microscopic clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of mechanical versus alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement on corneal cellular elements after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using confocal microscopy.

METHODS

This randomized, clinical trial included 66 eyes from 33 patients with spherical equivalent refraction <-4.00 diopters (D). Mechanical versus alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement was performed during PRK. The right eye of each patient was randomly assigned to one group (mechanical group or alcohol-assisted group) and the fellow eye to the alternate group. Confocal examination was performed preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were keratocyte density and maximum anterior stromal light reflectivity.

RESULTS

Mean epithelial healing time was 3.2 ± 0.4 and 3.0 ± 0.3 days in the mechanical and alcohol-assisted groups, respectively (P=.001). Anterior retroablation stromal keratocyte density was 704.3 ± 119.9 cells/mm² and 734.3 ± 103.7 cells/mm² at 3 months (P=.05) and 643.8 ± 134.4 cells/mm² and 696.7 ± 129.6 cells/mm² at 6 months (P=.02) in the mechanical and alcohol-assisted groups, respectively. No significant difference was noted in midstromal and posterior keratocyte density between the two groups. Maximum reflectivity was 61.56 ± 12.64 international units (IU) and 56.93 ± 7.86 IU in the mechanical and alcohol-assisted groups, respectively, 3 months after surgery (P=.018). Corresponding values were 49.46 ± 4.97 IU and 48.98 ± 4.60 IU, respectively, 6 months after surgery (P=.628).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to more adverse effects of mechanical epithelial debridement on anterior keratocyte density and anterior stromal reflectivity, alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement is recommended as the procedure of choice for epithelial removal during PRK in patients with mild myopia.

Coenzyme Q10 reduces ethanol-induced apoptosis in corneal fibroblasts

Dilute ethanol (EtOH) is a widely used agent to remove the corneal epithelium during the modern refractive surgery. The application of EtOH may cause the underlying corneal fibroblasts to undergo apoptosis. This study was designed to investigate the protective effect and potential mechanism of the respiratory chain coenzyme Q(10) (CoQ(10)), an electron transporter of the mitochondrial respiratory chain and a ubiquitous free radical scavenger, against EtOH-induced apoptosis of corneal fibroblasts. Corneal fibroblasts were pretreated with CoQ(10) (10 µM) for 2 h, followed by exposure to different concentrations of EtOH (0.4, 2, 4, and 20%) for 20 s. After indicated incubation period (2-12 h), MTT assay was used to examine cell viability. Treated cells were further assessed by flow cytometry to identify apoptosis. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the change in mitochondrial membrane potential were assessed using dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate/2',7'-dichlorofluorescein (DCFH-DA/DCF) assays and flow-cytometric analysis of JC-1 staining, respectively. The activity and expression of caspases 2, 3, 8, and 9 were evaluated with a colorimetric assay and western blot analysis. We found that EtOH treatment significantly decreased the viability of corneal fibroblasts characterized by a higher percentage of apoptotic cells. CoQ(10) could antagonize the apoptosis inducing effect of EtOH. The inhibition of cell apoptosis by CoQ(10) was significant at 8 and 12 h after EtOH exposure. In EtOH-exposed corneal fibroblasts, CoQ(10) pretreatment significantly reduced mitochondrial depolarization and ROS production at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min and inhibited the activation and expression of caspases 2 and 3 at 2 h after EtOH exposure. In summary, pretreatment with CoQ(10) can inhibit mitochondrial depolarization, caspase activation, and cell apoptosis. These findings support the proposition that CoQ(10) plays an antiapoptotic role in corneal fibroblasts after ethanol exposure.

Haze development after photorefractive keratectomy: mechanical vs ethanol epithelial removal in rabbits

PURPOSE

To compare mechanical and ethanol epithelial removal with respect to myofibroblast development and haze formation after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

Seventeen rabbits underwent mechanical or ethanol debridement, and the opposite eye of each rabbit served as an unwounded control. In both groups, the epithelium was removed with a spatula and discarded. A -9.00-diopter PRK was performed in each eye. The level of haze in each cornea at 4 weeks was graded at the slit-lamp microscope according to the Fantes scale. Myofibroblast generation was detected with immunocytochemistry for alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) and cells were quantitatively analyzed.

RESULTS

No difference was noted between the two groups in alpha-SMA + myofibroblasts 4 weeks after surgery (43.6+/-2.0/400x field and 45.7+/-4.8/400x field in ethanol and mechanical groups, respectively) (P=.10). A slight difference was noted but did not reach statistical significance with regard to stromal haze between ethanol and mechanical groups (2.0+/-0.5 and 2.3+/-0.4, respectively, P=.063). The ethanol and mechanical groups were statistically different when compared to controls regarding stromal haze and alpha-SMA+ cells (P<.0001for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was noted in clinical haze or myofibroblast generation between corneas that had PRK with mechanical or ethanol epithelial debridement.

Double-Masked Comparison of Ketorolac Tromethamine 0.4% Versus Nepafenac Sodium 0.1% for Postoperative Healing Rates and Pain Control in Eyes Undergoing Surface Ablation

PURPOSE

Determine the degree of postoperative pain and rate of healing in eyes treated with either ketorolac tromethamine 0.4% (Acular LS) or nepafenac sodium 0.1% (Nevanac) after flapless surface ablation [epi-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)].

METHODS

Prospective, randomized, double-masked, paired-eye comparison. Patients undergoing flapless surface ablation were randomized to receive ketorolac in 1 eye and nepafenac in the other. Drops were instilled immediately after the surgical procedure, and patients continued to instill the masked drops 3 times daily for 5 days. Study follow-up visits were at days 1 and 5 postoperatively. Patients were queried by phone regarding their level of pain at 5 hours postoperatively and on days 2, 3, and 4. Outcome measures included postoperative pain levels including need for additional rescue medications, rate of healing, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Although the original target population was 60 eyes of 30 patients, this study was halted after only 14 eyes of 7 patients because of concern for patient safety, because most patients in 1 arm developed haze. Eyes treated with nepafenac healed at a slower rate than eyes treated with ketorolac in 57% of patients. Mean time to healing was 5.7 +/- 1.1 days with ketorolac and 7.9 +/- 2.1 days with nepafenac (P = 0.066). Moreover, eyes treated with nepafenac exhibited statistically significant greater mean hazing scores at week 2 (P = 0.024) and month 1 (P = 0.039). Throughout the study, a greater percentage of nepafenac-treated eyes exhibited haze than did ketorolac-treated eyes. This difference was statistically significant at week 2 (P = 0.005) and month 1 (P = 0.039). Patients reported significantly more pain in nepafenac-treated eyes at day 3 when pain was at its peak (P = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing epi-LASIK, a statistically significant trend postoperative toward increased corneal haze was seen with nepafenac compared with ketorolac. Nepafenac therapy resulted in a non-statistically significant trend toward delayed healing. The study was halted because of safety concerns.

Early Postoperative Pain Following Epi-LASIK and Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Prospective, Comparative, Bilateral Study

PURPOSE

To compare postoperative pain associated with epi-LASIK versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

This prospective observer-masked randomized study included 40 eyes of 20 patients with myopia and astigmatism who received epi-LASIK (Moria Epi-K) in one eye and PRK in the contralateral eye. Corneal ablation was done using the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. Patients were seen at days 1, 3, and 6 to rate their pain via three measuring tools: 1) a global subjective rating, 2) a 10-cm visual analog scale, and 3) an 11-point numeric scale of pain.

RESULTS

On postoperative day 1, 19 of 20 patients reported pain in both eyes. Using the global subjective rating scale, patients reported more pain for those eyes treated by PRK. Although clinically relevant, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .56). Based on the 11-point numeric scale of pain and visual analog scale, mean pain scores were similar for both groups. On day 3, using the global subjective rating scale, 11 of 12 patients who had pain reported more in the epi-LASIK treated eye (P = .0005). In addition, epi-LASIK eyes demonstrated higher mean pain scores based on the other two scales (visual analog scale, P = .045 and 11-point numeric scale of pain, P = .023). Only 6 patients reported minimal pain on day 6. It was more frequently reported and slightly more marked in epi-LASIK eyes, but did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Epi-LASIK and PRK have similar pain on postoperative day 1, but epi-LASIK demonstrated statistically more pain than PRK on days 3 and 6.

Ethanol Treatment Induces Significant Cell Death in Porcine Corneal Fibroblasts

PURPOSE

To explore the effect of ethanol treatment on corneal stromal cells.

METHODS

Primary porcine corneal fibroblasts from passages 3 to 5 were treated with ethanol at concentrations of 10%, 15%, 20%, and 50% for 30 seconds. A control group was treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 30 seconds. Morphologic changes were documented with phase-contrast microscopy, and the growth curves were examined with a PicoGreen assay. Cellular viability was examined with an ethidium homodimer and calcein-AM stain, whereas cellular apoptosis and/or necrosis were analyzed by a YO-PRO-1 dye/propidium iodide apoptosis assay coupled with flow cytometry and further confirmed with a genomic DNA pattern assay. Cellular toxicity was examined with a lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) assay.

RESULTS

Significant cell rounding and detachment from the culture dish were noticed after 20% ethanol treatment of 30 seconds, despite that the cell morphology remained unchanged in the PBS and 10% and 15% ethanol groups. Twenty percent ethanol induced significant cellular toxicity, causing cell death as shown by ethidium homodimer and calcein-AM stain, YO-PRO-1 dye/propidium iodide apoptosis assay, and LDH assay, although 10% and 15% ethanol caused minimal changes to corneal fibroblasts. Cellular death was most significant 6 hours after the 20% ethanol treatment. The genomic DNA pattern revealed intact DNA in the control, 10% ethanol, and 15% ethanol groups at all times, whereas DNA smearing was noticed at 48 hours after the 20% ethanol treatment. However, none of the DNA examined revealed significant DNA laddering patterns of apoptosis. Fifty percent ethanol treatment of 30 seconds resulted in cell fixation and cell death.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with 20% ethanol for 30 seconds induced significant porcine corneal fibroblast cell death, whereas 10% and 15% ethanol treatment of 30 seconds caused minimal changes. We propose that, when applied for 30 seconds, 20% ethanol is the threshold level that causes cell death in cultured porcine corneal fibroblasts.

Corneal injury by anti-misting agent in swim goggles: a case report

PURPOSE

To report a case of corneal injury by swim goggle anti-misting agent.

METHODS

Case report.

RESULTS

A 47-year-old man presented with ocular injury caused by swim goggle anti-misting agent. Two weeks previously, the patient felt sudden ocular pain and grit after pool water flooded his goggles while swimming. Before the patient's swim, a copious amount of anti-misting agent was sprayed inside his goggles. On examination, severe corneal epithelial defect and stroma edema of the right eye were noted. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/40. Right eye corneal thickness was 625 microm. Topical corticosteroids, antibiotic eye drops, and oral tetracycline were started. After 1 week of treatment, the epithelial defect of his right cornea improved slightly. Stromal edema decreased mildly. Epithelial defect persisted at 1 month follow-up. Right eye BCVA remained 20/40. Three months after treatment, the right eye epithelial defect healed completely. Mild diffuse superficial stromal opacity was noted. BCVA improved to 20/20. At 1-year follow-up, right eye corneal thickness was 547 microm, which was thinner than the left eye. Right eye corneal endothelial cell density measured approximately 1500 cells/mm2, which was less than the left eye at 2300 cells/mm2. The faint, diffuse stromal opacity disappeared; however, white subepithelial plaques were noted in the cornea centers. After 1 month of treatment with topical corticosteroids, the plaques subsided completely. The corneas remained clear at 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Anti-misting agent can cause severe corneal injuries, including persistent epithelial defects, stromal edema and opacity, endothelial cell loss, and subepithelial plaque.

Advances in subepithelial excimer refractive surgery techniques: Epi-LASIK

The reports of an increasing incidence of iatrogenic ectasia, the evolution of wavefront aberrometry, and the suggestion that the laser in situ keratomileusis flap could lead to unpredictable biomechanical corneal changes have renewed interest in surface ablation and have set the stage for the introduction of alternative photorefractive treatment modalities. The theoretical advantage of surface procedures, such as laser epithelial keratomileusis that preserve the epithelial button, stems from the repositioning of the epithelial flap over the laser-ablated corneal surface. This epithelial sheet is thought to act as a natural contact lens that decreases postoperative pain and haze formation. Epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis is an alternative modality of epithelial separation with the use of a device that features a blunt oscillating blade. This surgical approach does not require the use of alcohol for epithelial loosening.

LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: advantages and indications

The advent of the excimer laser as an instrument for use in reshaping the corneal stroma was a great step forward in refractive surgery. Laser energy can be delivered on the stromal surface in the photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) procedure or deeper on the corneal stroma by the means of a lamellar surgery in which a flap is created with the microkeratome in the laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure. LASIK is currently the dominant procedure in refractive surgery. The main advantage of LASIK over PRK is related to maintaining the central corneal epithelium. This increases comfort during the early post-operative period, allows for rapid visual recovery, and reduces the wound healing response. Reduced wound healing correlates with less regression for high corrections and a lower rate of complications such as significant stromal opacity (haze). PRK, however, remains as an excellent option for mild to moderate corrections, particularly for cases associated with thin corneas, recurrent erosions, or a predisposition for trauma (Martial arts, military, etc.). Recently, a modification of PRK, laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK), was introduced. In the LASEK procedure, an epithelial flap is created and replaced after the ablation. The benefits, if any, of the creation of an epithelial flap compared to traditional PRK are not fully appreciated. Advocates of LASEK suggest that there is less discomfort in the early postoperative period, faster visual recovery, and less haze compared to standard PRK for correction of similar levels of refractive error. Additional long-term clinical studies, along with laboratory research, will be crucial to validate these potential advantages of LASEK procedure.

Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis for Myopia With the Autonomous Laser

PURPOSE

To describe the refractive outcome, objective clinical data, and subjective patient experiences after laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of 58 LASEK-treated eyes (36 patients) with myopia (with and without astigmatism) between -1.50 and -14.75 D (mean -7.80 +/- 2.90 D, median -7.90 D). Refractive surgery was performed using the Alcon Summit Autonomous LADAR Vision excimer laser. Manifest refraction, best-spectacle and uncorrected Snellen visual acuity, stability of refraction, and corneal haze were evaluated before surgery and up to 6 months after surgery. A group of randomly selected LASIK-treated eyes were compared at each time point.

RESULTS

Patients who opted for monovision (n=12) were excluded. In the emmetropia targeted eyes (n=46), 45%, 83%, 85%, and 89% achieved 20/40 or better uncorrected Snellen visual acuity (UCVA) at 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month respectively. At 6 months, 73% (n=28) of eyes treated achieved UCVA 20/20 with 97% achieving 20/40 or better (mean, -0.51 D). At 3 and 6 months, 71% (n=46) and 68% (n=28) were within +/- 0.50 D of emmetropia. The percentage of eyes that achieved UCVA 20/40 or better at 6 months was 97% (n=28). Visually significant corneal haze was evident in two LASEK-treated patients (four eyes) at 6 months. No eyes lost two or more lines of best spectacle-corrected Snellen visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary data suggest that LASEK appears to be a safe, effective, and comparable alternative to LASIK, even for higher amounts of myopia. A prospective, randomized clinical trial is needed to better define the role of LASEK as it compares to other refractive procedures, specifically LASIK and PRK.

Twenty percent alcohol toxicity on rabbit corneal epithelial cells: electron microscopic study

PURPOSE

To evaluate 20% ethanol toxicity on the rabbit corneal epithelium, ethanol-treated rabbit corneas were examined with electron microscopy.

METHODS

Rabbit corneas (24 eyes) were treated with 20% ethanol for 30 seconds, 1 minute, and 2 minutes by using LASEK (laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy) instruments and then washed with sterile water. Zero time, 1, 3, 5 days after ethanol treatment, corneas were excised and examined with scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM).

RESULTS

Widespread partial or total damage of microvilli, focal breaks of intercellular junction, and cellular edema was observed. The damage was more severe in corneas with longer ethanol treatment. In corneas with ethanol treatment more than 1 minute, slough of superficial corneal epithelium occurred and progressed with time. Two-minute ethanol treatment resulted in complete destruction of microvilli and significant separation of intercellular junction. These pathologic changes persisted 5 days after ethanol treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

From these results, increasing exposure time to ethanol more than 1 minute results in significant damage to superficial corneal epithelium and prolongs its normal recovery time.

Laser subepithelial keratomileusis: electron microscopy and visual outcomes of flap photorefractive keratectomy

Laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) is a surgical technique that may be performed in patients with low myopia who are considering conventional photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), in patients with thin corneas, and in patients with professions or lifestyles that predispose them to trauma. Ethanol (18%) is applied for 25 seconds and a hinged epithelial flap is created. After laser ablation, the flap is repositioned over the ablated stroma. Our data showed that epithelial defects occurred in 63% eyes on Day 1. Postoperative pain was absent in 47%. Uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better was achieved in all patients at 1 week. Data from several studies suggest that LASEK may reduce postoperative pain and corneal haze associated with PRK. LASEK offers the potential advantage of avoiding flap-related complications associated with laser in situ keratomileusis and decreasing postoperative pain and corneal scarring associated with PRK. Long-term studies are needed to confirm these potential advantages and to determine the safety, efficacy, and predictability of this surgical technique.

Pain After Epithelial Removal by Ethanol-assisted Mechanical Versus Transepithelial Excimer Laser Debridement

PURPOSE

To compare subjective pain responses between two techniques of epithelial removal prior to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) treatment: ethanol-soaked pledget with mechanical debridement of the epithelium versus excimer laser transepithelial ablation.

METHODS

Nine patients underwent bilateral PRK. Each had the epithelium in one eye debrided by placing a pledget soaked in 20% ethanol on the cornea for 2 minutes followed by gentle scraping with a blade. The epithelium in the other eye was removed by transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) treatment. For each eye, PRK was initiated immediately after removal of the epithelium. On postoperative day one, each patient was asked to rate the level of pain suffered over the last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (minimal) to 10 (maximal). Data were analyzed in a masked fashion.

RESULTS

Postoperative day one average pain level in the ethanol-assisted mechanically debrided eyes was 3.0 +/- 2.5 and in the transepithelial PTK eyes was 6.8 +/- 1.8. The difference was statistically significant by Student's t-test (P < .01). All epithelial defects healed within 3 days with no clinically significant difference in healing time between the two techniques.

CONCLUSION

In preparation for PRK, ethanol-assisted mechanical debridement of the epithelium caused significantly less postoperative pain than epithelial removal using the excimer laser.

Apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar after retreatment in hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy

PURPOSE

To report a complication, apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar, that can occur after hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) retreatment.

SETTING

Istanbul University Eye Research Center, Istanbul, Turkey.

METHODS

Twelve eyes of 6 patients with apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar were retrospectively studied. Mean age of the 5 men and 1 woman was 30.2 years +/- 5.4 (SD). All eyes had hyperopic PRK retreatment for regression 9.5 +/- 1.44 months after primary hyperopic PRK. Mean spherical equivalent refraction of the residual hyperopia before retreatment was +4.67 +/- 0.81 diopters (D). All patients had a corneal haze grade of less than 1+. Hyperopic PRK retreatment was performed with a 193 nm excimer laser (Chiron Technolas Keracor 116).

RESULTS

Apical nodular subepithelial corneal scars developed within the first month of hyperopic PRK retreatment and progressed until the third month in 12 eyes of 6 patients. The lesion was round and symmetrical in both eyes, smaller than 2.0 mm, and centrally located. During the mean 40.66 +/- 2.46 month follow-up, the lesion did not change in size or density. Mean spherical equivalent refraction after retreatment was 2.88 +/- 0.88 D (range +1.50 to +4.00 D) at 1 month and +4.36 +/- 1.83 D at last follow-up. Refraction was unmeasurable in 3 eyes. Five eyes lost 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and 7 eyes, 2 or more lines. The surface regularity indexes were higher than 2.00 in all the eyes.

CONCLUSION

Hyperopic PRK retreatment may cause the sight-threatening complication of apical nodular subepithelial corneal scar. This complication behaves unlike corneal haze and does not resolve spontaneously over time.

Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach

We determined the "normal" central corneal thickness (CCT) value in human corneas based on reported literature values for within-study average CCT values, and used this as a reference to assess the reported impact of physiological variables (especially age and diurnal effects), contact lens wear, pharmaceuticals, ocular disease, and ophthalmic surgery on CCT. With the expected CCT and its variance defined, it should be possible to determine the potential impact of differences in CCT in intraocular pressure (IOP) assessments, especially by applanation tonometry, using a meta-analysis approach. Some 600 sets of CCT data were identified from the worldwide literature over the period of 1968 through mid-1999, of which 134 included IOP measures as well. The within-study average CCT values and reported variance (SD) was noted along with the number of eyes and any special characteristics, including probable ethnic origin of the study subjects. Various sets of data were subjected to statistical analyses. From 300 data sets from eyes designated as normal, the group-averaged CCT was 0.534 mm. From 230 data sets where interindividual variance was reported, the group-averaged CCT was 0.536 mm (median 0.536 mm; average SD of 0. 031 mm, average coefficient of variation = 5.8%). Overall, studies using slit-lamp-based pachometry have reported marginally lower CCT values (average 0.530 mm, average SD 0.029 mm) compared to ultrasound-based studies (average 0.544, average SD 0.034 mm), which perhaps reflects the type of individual studied (non-surgical vs. pre-surgical patients) rather than the technique itself. A slight chronological increase in reported average CCT values (approximately 0.006 mm/decade) was evident, but a substantial chronological increase was evident for ultrasound pachometry studies (approximately 0.015 mm/decade). Within the meta-analysis-generated average and variance, age had no obvious impact on CCT measures for *whites, although an age-related decline in CCT is evident for non-whites. Any diurnal effects are likely concealed within the expected variance in CCT. Contact lens wear and pharmaceuticals generally produced changes in CCT that were well within the expected variance in CCT. Of the ocular diseases, only those associated with collagen disorders (including keratoconus) or endothelial-based corneal dystrophies (e.g., Fuchs) were likely to result in decreases or increases, respectively, of CCT beyond the normal variance. Routine contact lens wear and diseases such as diabetes seem unlikely to produce changes in CCT of a magnitude that would justify pachometry as a monitoring method beyond routine slit-lamp evaluation. Increases in CCT beyond the expected variance were reported after a range of intraocular surgeries (cataract operations, penetrating keratoplasty), whereas photorefractive surgery produces a measurable decrease in CCT. A meta-analysis of possible association between CCT and IOP measures of 133 data sets, regardless of the type of eyes assessed, revealed a statistically significant correlation; a 10% difference in CCT would result in a 3. 4 +/- 0.9 mm Hg difference in IOP (P </= 0.001, r = 0.419). The observed phenomenon was much smaller for eyes designated as healthy (1.1 +/- 0.6 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT, P = 0.023, r = 0. 331). For eyes with chronic diseases, the change was 2.5 +/- 1.1 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT (P = 0.005, r = 0.450), whereas a substantial but highly variable association was seen for eyes with acute onset disease (approximately 10.0 +/- 3.1 mm Hg for a 10% difference in CCT, P = 0.004, r = 0.623). Based on the meta-analysis, normal CCT in white adults would be expected to be within +/-11.6% (+/-2 SD) of 0.535 mm, i.e., 0.473-0.597 mm (95% CI, 0.474-0.596). The impact of CCT on applanation tonometry of healthy eyes is unlikely to achieve clinical significance, but for corneas of eyes with chronic disease, pachometry should be performed if the tonometry reveals IOP readi

Comparison of mechanical and transepithelial debridement during photorefractive keratectomy

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of clinical results from mechanical and transepithelial debridement during photorefractive keratectomy.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective study.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred seventy-eight eyes in 173 patients between November 1995 and June 1997.

INTERVENTION

Photorefractive keratectomy treatments with a Summit Omnimed excimer laser (6-mm). Clinical results were measured at 1, 3, and 6 months.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean spherical equivalent (MSE), astigmatism, corneal haze, and subjective vision (day, night, glare, and halo).

RESULTS

At all postoperative intervals, no significant difference was present between mean values of MSE, haze, or any subjective parameters. For mean UCVA, BCVA, and astigmatism values, a significant difference (P < 0.05) was present only at 6 months. At all postoperative intervals, mechanical values tended to be superior to transepithelial valves.

CONCLUSION

Clinical results were not statistically different between the two techniques; however, the mechanical technique tended to have superior values for almost all tested parameters.

Comparison of 18% Ethanol and Mechanical Debridement for Epithelial Removal Before Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

To assess the safety of alcohol compared to mechanical debridement for epithelial removal prior to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

Forty-one second eyes of 41 patients underwent epithelial removal using alcohol prior to PRK with a Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. The results were compared with the results of the 41 first eyes of the same patients that had mechanical debridement.

RESULTS

Initial results showed that the alcohol treated group tended to stay slightly hyperopic but had less haze compared to the mechanical debridement group. The treating surgeons favored alcohol as the preferred method of epithelium removal.

CONCLUSION

Alcohol debridement is an effective procedure although algorithms may have to be altered to take into account the slightly different healing process postoperatively.