Anterior uveitis and hypotony after intravenous cidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis

Ophthalmic manifestations of monkeypox infection

After the global COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an alarming concern with the monkeypox (mpox) outbreak, which has affected more than 110 countries worldwide. Monkeypox virus is a doublestranded DNA virus of the genus Orthopox of the Poxviridae family, which causes this zoonotic disease. Recently, the mpox outbreak was declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC). Monkeypox patients can present with ophthalmic manifestation and ophthalmologists have a role to play in managing this rare entity. Apart from causing systemic involvement such as skin lesions, respiratory infection and involvement of body fluids, Monkeypox related ophthalmic disease (MPXROD) causes varied ocular manifestations such as lid and adnexal involvement, periorbital and lid lesion, periorbital rash, conjunctivitis, blepharocounctivitis and keratitis. A detailed literature review shows few reports on MPXROD infections with limited overview on management strategies. The current review article is aimed to provide the ophthalmologist with an overview of the disease with a spotlight on ophthalmic features. We briefly discuss the morphology of the MPX, various modes of transmission, an infectious pathway of the virus, and the host immune response. A brief overview of the systemic manifestations and complications has also been elucidated. We especially highlight the detailed ophthalmic manifestations of mpox, their management, and prevention of vision threatening sequelae.

A Review of Monkeypox Ocular Manifestations and Complications: Insights for the 2022 Outbreak

Monkeypox (MPVX) infection has been associated with multiorgan presentations. Thus, monkeypox infection's early and late complications are of particular concern, prompting health systems to decipher threatening sequels and their possible countermeasures. The current article will review the clinical signs and symptoms of the present and former outbreaks, differential diagnoses, workup and treatment of the ocular manifestations of MPXV infection in detail. One of the uncommon yet considerable MPXV complications is ocular involvement. These injuries are classified as (1) more frequent and benign lesions and (2) less common and vision-threatening sequels. Conjunctivitis, blepharitis and photophobia are the most uncomplicated reported presentations. Moreover, MPXV can manifest as eye redness, frontal headache, orbital and peri-ocular rashes, lacrimation and ocular discharge, subconjunctival nodules and, less frequently, as keratitis, corneal ulceration, opacification, perforation and blindness. The ocular manifestations have been less frequent and arguably less severe within the current outbreak. Despite the possibility of underestimation, the emerging evidence from observational investigations documented rates of around 1% for ocular involvement in the current outbreak compared to a 9-23% incidence in previous outbreaks in the endemic countries. The history of smallpox immunization is a protective factor against these complications. Despite a lack of definite and established treatment, simple therapies like regular lubrication and prophylactic use of topical antibiotics may be considered for MPXV ocular complications. Timely administration of specific antivirals may also be effective in severe cases. Monkeypox usually has mild to moderate severity and a self-limited course. However, timely recognition and proper management of the disease could reduce the risk of permanent ocular sequelae and disease morbidity.

Monkeypox as an emerging infectious disease: the ophthalmic implications

The 2022 outbreak of monkeypox is of worldwide significance. There has been a rapid escalation in case numbers despite efforts to contain it and the WHO has declared it a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. To date, over 51 257 laboratory-confirmed cases have been reported, the majority in non-endemic countries, with 3279 in the UK. It is vital for ophthalmologists to understand this disease and the risk it poses. Human monkeypox is a zoonotic disease caused by the monkeypox virus, a double-stranded DNA virus in the Orthopoxvirus genus of the Poxviridae family. Other orthopoxviruses include variola (smallpox), cowpox and vaccinia; all of which have significant ocular sequelae. Transmission occurs from an animal reservoir (unknown, likely rodents) to a human host, leading to secondary human-to-human spread. During the recent outbreak, a higher incidence has been found in gay, bisexual or other men who have sex with men. Clinical diagnosis may be challenging as presentation can mimic common ophthalmic diseases. A thorough history is key to identifying potential cases. Ophthalmic manifestations may include preseptal cellulitis, conjunctivitis and keratitis. The oral antiviral agent tecovirimat, which was developed to treat smallpox, is the mainstay of treatment. Trifluorothymidine (trifluridine) eye-drops can be used for ophthalmic involvement. In addition, smallpox vaccines have provided some cross-immunity. Ocular monkeypox should be managed by infectious diseases specialists, in consultation with ophthalmologists to provide the expertise needed to treat potentially vision-threatening complications. This outbreak highlights the need for healthcare providers to implement appropriate infection control measures and be familiar with the identification and treatment of both cutaneous and ocular disease.

[Drug-induced uveitis]

In recent years, an increasing amount of attention has been paid to medicinal products as possible risk factors in the development of eye diseases. The frequency of diagnosed drug-induced uveitis is growing yearly, which can be attributed to the appearance of new drugs - biological agents (immune checkpoint inhibitors, BRAF and MEK inhibitors, vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors, tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors), as well as systemic bisphosphonates and some antiviral drugs. The time interval between the beginning of the drug use and the appearance of uveitis symptoms varies from several days to months. Common symptoms include eye pain, photophobia, the appearance of floating opacities, and reduced vision associated with active inflammatory changes in the retina and optic nerve and outcomes of those inflammations. Timely diagnosis, cancellation of the drug that caused uveitis and appointment of adequate anti-inflammatory therapy in most cases effectively stops the symptoms of the disease, which determines the relevance of attention to the prevalence, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced uveitis.

Pharmacologically induced uveitis

Treatments of numerous systemic and local diseases of different etiologies may be accompanied by an unwanted side effect in the form of uveitis. We inform readers about medications that have the potential to cause uveitis and analyze the strength of association of these medications with uveitis. Subsequently, cessation of medication or appropriate treatment can be individualized for each patient for the purpose of preventing further damage to tissue structure and function. Being aware of these associations, physicians may readily identify medications that may cause uveitis and avoid expensive and unnecessary clinical and laboratory testing.

The Changing Global Epidemic of HIV and Ocular Disease

Purpose: Overview of the evolving epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related ocular disease over time. Method: Narrative review. Results: HIV enhances susceptibility to opportunistic eye infections, has direct pathogenic effects, and places patients at risk of immune recovery inflammatory syndromes in previously infected eyes after starting highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Widespread availability of HAART has resulted in a decrease of infectious ocular conditions such as cytomegalovirus retinitis, toxoplasmic retinitis, squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva, and microvascular retinopathy. However, large coexisting burdens of tuberculosis, herpesvirus infection and syphilis (among others) continue to contribute to the burden of ocular disease, especially in low-resource settings. Growing risks of cataract, retinopathy and retinal nerve fiber thinning can affect patients with chronic HIV on HAART; thought due to chronic inflammation and immune activation. Conclusion: The changing epidemic of ocular disease in HIV-infected patients warrants close monitoring and identification of interventions that can help reduce the imminent burden of disease.

Drug-induced Uveitis in HIV Patients with Ocular Opportunistic Infections

Purpose: To describe drug-induced uveitis in immunocompromised patients diagnosed with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection Methods: Narrative Review Results: Systemic and intraocular medications administered for the treatment of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-associated diseases in patients infected with HIV are a well-known cause of uveitis. Conclusions: Cidofovir and rifabutin, among other novel anti-retroviral therapies, are strongly associated with drug-induced uveitis. It is imperative to understand the pathogenesis, clinical findings, and management of HIV patients with uveitis induced by these agents.

Intraocular pressure in patients with human immunodeficiency virus, correlation with TCD4, viral load and demographic characteristics: a case-control study

Purpose

To compare if patients with HIV have lower intraocular pressure than patients without HIV.

Methods

The association of intraocular pressure corrected by pachymetry and the relationship with viral load (VL) and TCD4 cells was studied. A total of 99 patients with HIV (91 who were on regular treatment and in control of the disease - group 1; and 8 who were without treatment - group 2) and 100 controls were studied.

Results

Only age was of statistical significance; the group with HIV without control of the disease was the youngest. There was a decrease of -1.54 mmHg in the IOP of group 1 in relation to the controls and -3.63 mmHg in the IOP of group 2 in relation to the controls.

Conclusion

HIV patients had lower IOP than the control population. However, the relationship between IOP, VL and TCD4 was not found.

Safety considerations with current and emerging antiviral therapies for cytomegalovirus infection in transplantation

Introduction: Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a major contributor of morbidity and mortality, and its management is essential for the successful outcome of solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Areas covered: This review discusses the safety profiles of currently available and emerging antiviral drugs and the other strategies for HCMV prevention and treatment after transplantation. Expert opinion: Strategies for management of HCMV rely largely on the use of antiviral agents that inhibit viral DNA polymerase (ganciclovir/valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir/brincidofovir) and viral terminase complex (letermovir), with different types and degrees of adverse effects. An investigational agent, maribavir, exerts its anti-CMV effect through UL97 inhibition, and its safety profile is under clinical evaluation. In choosing the antiviral medication to use, it is important to consider these safety profiles in addition to overall efficacy. In addition to antiviral drugs, reduction of immunosuppression is often generally needed in the management of HCMV infection, but with a potential risk of allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease. The use of HCMV-specific or non-specific intravenous immunoglobulins remains debated, while adoptive HCMV-specific T cell therapy remains investigational, and associated with unique set of adverse effects.

Ocular hypotony: A comprehensive review

Ocular hypotony is an infrequent, yet potentially vision-threatening, entity. The list of differential causes is extensive, involving any condition that may compromise aqueous humor dynamics or the integrity of the globe and sometimes following medical treatments or procedures. Depending on the cause and the clinical impact, treatment options aim to correct the underlying pathology and to reestablish anatomical integrity, as well as visual function. We review the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, different causes, and associated therapeutic options of ocular hypotony.

Drug-induced uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced uveitis is a well described but often overlooked and/or misdiagnosed adverse reaction to medication. There are an increasing number of medications that have been related to the onset of intraocular inflammation. Identification of these inciting agents may decisively help the diagnostic algorithm involving new cases of uveitis.

AREAS COVERED

This review intends to be an updated comprehensive, practical guide for practitioners regarding the main drugs that have been associated with uveitis. A classification proposed by Naranjo et al. in 1981 for establishing potential causality is applied examining possible mechanisms of action. A guide for clinicians about the rationale of these observations when dealing with patients with uveitis is provided.

EXPERT OPINION

Several agents with different routes of administration (systemic, topical and/or intraocular) may cause intraocular inflammation. The mechanism behind ocular inflammation is frequently unknown. Clinicians should be aware of the potential drug effect to optimize diagnosis and management of such patients.

Neurological and psychiatric adverse effects of antiretroviral drugs

Antiretroviral drugs are associated with a variety of adverse effects on the central and peripheral nervous systems. The frequency and severity of neuropsychiatric adverse events is highly variable, with differences between the antiretroviral classes and amongst the individual drugs in each class. In the developing world, where the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) stavudine remains a commonly prescribed antiretroviral, peripheral neuropathy is an important complication of treatment. Importantly, this clinical entity is often difficult to distinguish from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-induced peripheral neuropathy. Several clinical trials have addressed the efficacy of various agents in the treatment of NRTI-induced neurotoxicity. NRTI-induced neurotoxicity is caused by inhibition of mitochondrial DNA polymerase. This mechanism is also responsible for the mitochondrial myopathy and lactic acidosis that occur with zidovudine. NRTIs, particularly zidovudine and abacavir, may also cause central nervous system (CNS) manifestations, including mania and psychosis. The non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) efavirenz is perhaps the antiretroviral most commonly associated with CNS toxicity, causing insomnia, irritability and vivid dreams. Recent studies have suggested that the risk of developing these adverse effects is increased in patients with various cytochrome P450 2B6 alleles. Protease inhibitors cause perioral paraesthesias and may indirectly increase the relative risk of stroke by promoting atherogenesis. HIV integrase inhibitors, C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) inhibitors and fusion inhibitors rarely cause neuropsychiatric manifestations.

Drug-induced uveitis

A number of medications have been associated with uveitis. This review highlights both well-established and recently reported systemic, topical, intraocular, and vaccine-associated causes of drug-induced uveitis, and assigns a quantitative score to each medication based upon criteria originally described by Naranjo and associates.

Moxifloxacin and bilateral acute iris transillumination

Recent publications have alerted clinicians to a syndrome of uveitic transilluminating iris depigmentation associated with systemic fluoroquinolones and other antibiotics. Bilateral acute iris transillumination, which is associated with loss of the iris pigment epithelium and results in iris transillumination, differs from the previously described bilateral acute depigmentation of the iris, which is associated with atrophy of the iris stroma without transillumination. We present a case of fluoroquinolone-associated uveitis with anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging to highlight some observations about this syndrome. We interpret pharmacokinetic data to help explain why oral, but not topical, moxifloxacin may cause fluoroquinolone-associated uveitis.

Intraocular pressure changes: an important determinant of the biocompatibility of intravitreous implants

BACKGROUND

In recent years, research efforts exploring the possibility of using biomaterial nanoparticles for intravitreous drug delivery has increased significantly. However, little is known about the effect of material properties on intravitreous tissue responses.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

To find the answer, nanoparticles made of hyaluronic acid (HA), poly (l-lactic acid) (PLLA), polystyrene (PS), and Poly N-isopropyl acrylamide (PNIPAM) were tested using intravitreous rabbit implantation model. Shortly after implantation, we found that most of the implants accumulated in the trabecular meshwork area followed by clearance from the vitreous. Interestingly, substantial reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) was observed in eyes implanted with particles made of PS, PNIPAM and PLLA, but not HA nanoparticles and buffered salt solution control. On the other hand, based on histology, we found that the particle implantation had no influence on cornea, iris and even retina. Surprisingly, substantial CD11b+ inflammatory cells were found to accumulate in the trabecular meshwork area in some animals. In addition, there was a good relationship between recruited CD11b+ cells and IOP reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the results reveal the potential influence of nanoparticle material properties on IOP reduction and inflammatory responses in trabecular meshwork. Such interactions may be critical for the development of future ocular nanodevices with improved safety and perhaps efficacy.

Intraocular Properties of An Alkoxyalkyl Derivative of Cyclic 9-(S)-(3-Hydroxyl-2-Phosphonomehoxypropyl) Adenine, An Intravitreally Injectable Anti-HCMV Drug in Rabbit and Guinea Pig

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate intraocular properties and determine the highest nontoxic dose of hexadecyloxypropyl-cyclic-HPMPA (HDP-cHPMPA), a novel, potent, intravitreally injectable, slow-releasing crystalline drug for long-acting treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis.

METHODS

Various concentrations of HDP-cHPMPA were first studied in vitro in a human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cell line infected with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) to determine the EC50. In vivo, 9 pigmented rabbits and 3 doses (55, 100, and 550 microg/eye) were tested in triplicate in 1 eye of each animal. The eyes were monitored with slit lamp, tonopen, indirect ophthalmoscopy, electroretinography (ERG), and histology. A confirmation toxicity study with the dose equivalent to the highest nontoxic dose in rabbit was performed in 9 guinea pig eyes (a second species) to study the potential adverse effect on intraocular pressure (IOP).

RESULTS

In vitro testing in HFF cells showed an EC50 against HCMV of 0.02 microM, which is 75- and 60-fold greater than that of ganciclovir and cidofovir, respectively. All eyes injected with 550 microg/eye and 1 eye injected with 100 microg/eye of HDP-cHPMPA showed toxicity clinically (e.g., vitreous cells, disc edema, and retinal inflammation) as well as histologically (e.g., inflammatory cells in iris, vitreous, and retinal layers with disorganization). None of the eyes injected with 55 microg/eye of HDP-cHPMPA showed toxicity clinically (including ERG) and histologically. The equivalent dose (9.2 microg/eye) in the guinea pig eyes did not show toxicity either, including IOP evaluation (P > 0.05 at all time points after injection).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal injection of the highest nontoxic dose of 55 microg/eye of HDP-cHPMPA in rabbit eyes yields a calculated intravitreal concentration of 65 microM, which is 3250-fold greater than the EC50 against HCMV (0.02 microM). Also, it does not cause hypotony in rabbit and guinea pig eyes and has a vitreous residence time of over 4 months.

Anterior Segment and External Ocular Disorders Associated with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease

The eye is a common site for complications of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Although cytomegalovirus retinitis remains the most prevalent of the blinding ocular disorders that can occur in individuals with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), several important HIV-associated disorders may involve the anterior segment, ocular surface, and adnexae. Some of these entities, such as Kaposi sarcoma, were well described, but uncommon, before the HIV epidemic. Others, like microsporidial keratoconjunctivitis, have presentations that differ between affected individuals with HIV disease and those from the general population who are immunocompetent. The treatment of many of these diseases is challenging because of host immunodeficiency. Survival after the diagnosis of AIDS has increased among individuals with HIV disease because of more effective antiretroviral therapies and improved prophylaxis against, and treatment of, opportunistic infections. This longer survival may lead to an increased prevalence of anterior segment and external ocular disorders. In addition, the evaluation and management of disorders such as blepharitis and dry eye, which were previously overshadowed by more severe, blinding disorders, may demand increased attention, as the general health of this population improves. Not all individuals infected with HIV receive potent antiretroviral therapy, however, because of socioeconomic or other factors, and others will be intolerant of these drugs or experience drug failure. Ophthalmologists must, therefore, still be aware of the ocular findings that develop in the setting of severe immunosuppression. This article reviews the spectrum of HIV-associated anterior segment and external ocular disorders, with recommendations for their evaluation and management.

HIV-associated retinopathy in the HAART era

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in restoring immune function in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) has led to changes in the incidence, natural history, management, and sequelae of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated retinopathies, especially cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis.

METHODS

The medical literature pertaining to HIV-associated retinopathies was reviewed with special attention to the differences in incidence, management strategies, and complications of these conditions in the eras both before and after the widespread use of HAART.

RESULTS

In the pre-HAART era, CMV retinitis was the most common HIV-associated retinopathy, occurring in 20%-40% of patients. Median time to progression was 47 to 104 days, mean survival after diagnosis was 6 to 10 months, and indefinite intravenous maintenance therapy was mandatory. Retinal detachment occurred in 24%-50% of patients annually. Herpetic retinopathy and toxoplasmosis retinochoroiditis occurred in 1%-3% of patients and Pneumocystis carinii choroiditis, syphilitic retinitis, tuberculous choroiditis, cryptococcal choroiditis, and intraocular lymphoma occurred infrequently. In the HAART era the incidence of CMV retinitis has declined 80% and survival after diagnosis has increased to over 1 year. Immune recovery in patients on HAART has allowed safe discontinuation of maintenance therapy in patients with regressed CMV retinitis and other HIV-associated retinopathies. Immune recovery uveitis (IRU) is a HAART dependent inflammatory response that may occur in up to 63% of patients with regressed CMV retinitis and elevated CD4 counts and is associated with vision loss from epiretinal membrane, cataract, and cystoid macular edema.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence, visual morbidity, and mortality of CMV retinitis and other HIV-associated retinopathies have decreased in the era of HAART and lifelong maintenance therapy may safely be discontinued in patients with restored immune function. Patients with regressed CMV retinitis, however, may still lose vision from epiretinal membrane, cystoid macular edema, and cataract secondary to IRU.

Ocular association of HIV infection in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy and the global perspective

Ocular involvement is a common complication of HIV infection. Since the late 1990s, widespread use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has altered the spectrum, and reduced the incidence of ocular involvement in developed countries. The incidence of the most common ocular opportunistic infection, cytomegalovirus retinitis, has decreased tremendously. However, immune recovery uveitis secondary to HAART has emerged as a frequent visually threatening condition. Early diagnosis and treatment with periocular steroids is helpful in minimizing visual loss. Clinicians should also be aware that certain antimicrobial agents used to treat opportunistic infections in HIV-positive patients are associated with potentially serious ocular side effects. In developing countries, where most of the world's 40 million HIV-positive patients live, the spectrum and incidence of ocular involvement differ from those in developed countries. The lack of HAART availability is among the many causes of these differences, which may include nutritional factors, basic medical care availability and the levels of exposure to different infectious agents. These factors add to the already challenging task of treating ocular complications and preventing blindness in HIV-positive patients in developing countries.

Virtual screening of HIV-1 protease inhibitors against human cytomegalovirus protease using docking and molecular dynamics

The clearance of cytomegalovirus viraemia in HIV-1-infected patients may partly result from the inhibition of cytomegalovirus protease by HIV-1 protease inhibitors contained in highly active antiretroviral therapy. We used a computational method to calculate the binding affinity of six HIV-1 protease inhibitors to cytomegalovirus protease based on its X-ray crystallography structure. The calculations showed that amprenavir and indinavir occupy the substrate-binding site of the cytomegalovirus protease with high affinity, and may be implicated in alleviating cytomegalovirus infection.

Rétinites nécrosantes herpétiques

The diagnosis of necrotic herpetic retinitis is suggested on clinical grounds, prompting urgent appropriate intravenous and intravitreal treatment. PCR on ocular samples is most often successful in identifying the herpetic agent. Classic acute retinal necrosis syndrome caused by herpes simplex or zoster virus and the different clinical forms present in immunocompetent or immunodepressed patients are described. The differential diagnosis includes atypical presentation of retinal necrosis caused by toxoplasmosis, syphilis, or ocular lymphoma; the ocular samples are useful in establishing the etiological diagnosis. We describe the different therapeutic strategies in the acute phase and as secondary prophylactic treatment. The clinical outcome appears to be influenced by rapid, appropriate treatment, limiting the extension of the retinal necrosis.

Correlation between cidofovir-associated uveitis and failing immunorestoration during HAART

In order to elucidate the factors related to the development of cidofovir-associated uveitis in AIDS patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy, the characteristics of 17 AIDS patients with Cytomegalovirus retinitis ( n=10) or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy ( n=7) treated with intravenous cidofovir were evaluated. Six cases of cidofovir-associated uveitis occurred among the patients with retinitis. No cases were detected among the patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Stepwise linear regression analysis revealed a significantly higher HIV-viremia level ( P=0.01) and a significantly lower CD4+ cell count ( P=0.009) among cases at the time of uveitis onset in comparison with patients who did not develop uveitis. Thus, cidofovir-associated uveitis seems to occur more frequently in AIDS patients with retinitis in whom highly active antiretroviral therapy fails to restore immunity.

[Herpes and retinal lesions: what's new?]

The viral retinitis are linked to infection by herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella zoster virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV). When the diagnosis is clinically suspected the antiviral treatment has to be introduced immediately after performing the ocular sampling to try to identify the infectious agent. Despite the various antiherpetic drugs available by intravenous routes and intravitreal injection, the prognostic of the herpetic retinitis remained severe because of the occurrence of retinal detachment, optic neuritis, macular necrosis. Various clinical forms are described: (1) the classical "acute necrotizing retinitis" (2) a form with a slow progression of the necrotizing retinitis (3) occlusive retinal arteritis (4) the highly severe "progressive retinal necrosis". The incidence of the CMV retinitis diminished with the highly antiretroviral therapy; however uveitis may occur with no active CMV retinitis. The various antiherpetic drugs are described with special indications.

Safety of intravitreous fomivirsen for treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS

PURPOSE

To report data regarding the safety of intravitreous fomivirsen for treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).

DESIGN

Critical review of safety data from three randomized controlled clinical trials with supplemental information from an expanded drug access program.

METHODS

Adverse ocular events reported by clinician investigators were listed using terms modified from the COSTART dictionary. Data for two doses (165-microg/injection [35 eyes, 30 patients] and 330-microg/injection [153 eyes, 120 patients]) and two 330-microg/injection dose schedules of different intensity were pooled to calculate incidence rates for each event. Rates were calculated as "events/patient-year" (based on total cumulative reported events and duration of treatment) for events that could recur during treatment. Rates were calculated as "patients with events/person-year" for the following events: retinal detachment, cataract, visual field disturbance, and retinal pigment epitheliopathy. To assess the ability to manage events, we reviewed treatments given for two events (anterior chamber inflammation, increased intraocular pressure) in one trial. We also report an analysis comparing the proportion of eyes that developed one or more key events to the cumulative number of injections.

RESULTS

Incidence rates were dose and schedule dependent (165 microg/injection, 4.06 events/patient-year; 330 microg/injection, 6.58 events/patient-year [less intense regimen] and 8.35 events/patient-year [more intense regimen]). The most frequently reported events were anterior chamber inflammation and increased intraocular pressure. We found no evidence that the proportion of patients with events increased as the number of injections increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreous fomivirsen is well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile. Adverse ocular events associated with doses and schedules used clinically can be managed successfully with medical therapy.

Ophthalmic manifestations of HIV: an update

A variety of ocular disease processes have been identified in HIV-antibody positive persons, especially in people with AIDS. The most common sight-threatening disease in this population is cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis. Effective therapies are available to treat CMV retinitis. However, such therapies carry potentially challenging toxicities. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has improved immune system functioning in many of its adherents, decreasing the incidence and improving the clinical course of CMV retinitis. However, a recent phenomenon associated with HAART, immune recovery uveitis (IRU), has been noted with additional, often problematic ocular manifestations in many persons with CMV retinitis. Periodic ophthalmic examination is prudent for all persons with HIV and especially for people with AIDS.

Economic evaluation of systemic treatments for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS

OBJECTIVE

To determine the cost of using systemic therapy to treat newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis in persons with AIDS.

DESIGN

Incidence-based simulation model of CMV treatment from a government payer perspective.

SETTING

Swiss healthcare system.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed CMV retinitis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned to 1 of 4 treatment regimens for induction and maintenance therapy: (i) intravenous (IV) cidofovir induction and maintenance (cidofovir IV/IV); (ii) IV foscarnet induction and maintenance (foscarnet IV/IV); (iii) IV ganciclovir induction and maintenance (ganciclovir IV/IV); and (iv) IV ganciclovir induction and oral (PO) ganciclovir maintenance (ganciclovir IV/PO). Following a second relapse, patients were assigned to one of the other regimens.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to first and subsequent progression, duration of maintenance treatment and direct medical expenditures [1998 Swiss francs (SwF)] .

RESULTS

The median time to first progression was longest for cidofovir IV/IV, followed by foscarnet IV/IV, ganciclovir IV/IV and ganciclovir IV/PO. Mean survival was 13 months and mean costs for this period in the base case were lowest in those initially treated with cidofovir (SwF146,742), followed by initial treatment with foscarnet IV/IV (SwF194,809), ganciclovir IV/PO (SwF195,190) and ganciclovir IV/IV (SwF243,964). Costs were most sensitive to changes in efficacy estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the regimens studied, initiation of treatment with systemic cidofovir appears least costly over a 13-month period.

Immune-recovery uveitis in patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis taking highly active antiretroviral therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical features associated with immune recovery in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis who are taking highly active antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

Sixteen patients were evaluated prospectively at the National Eye Institute, Bethesda, Maryland. Evaluation included a medical history and a complete ophthalmologic examination. The examination included best-corrected visual acuity score measured by means of logarithmic charts, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, dilated retinal examination, retinal photography, and fluorescein angiography. Immune-recovery uveitis was defined as the ocular inflammation associated with clinical immune recovery in patients taking potent antiretroviral regimens. The ophthalmic characteristics of immune-recovery uveitis were identified, and their effect on visual acuity was statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean CD4+ T-lymphocyte count for the 16 patients taking highly active antiretroviral therapy at the time of evaluation was 393 cells/microl (range, 97-1,338 cells/microl). Immune-recovery uveitis was characterized by vitreitis and optic disk and macular edema. Clinically important complications of immune-recovery uveitis included cataract and epiretinal membrane formation. The visual acuity scores were significantly worse in the 23 eyes with cytomegalovirus retinitis (mean, 67.2 letters, 20/50) than in the nine eyes without cytomegalovirus retinitis (mean, 89.8 letters, 20/16) (P <.001). Regression analysis showed that a lower visual acuity score was associated with the presence of moderate to severe macular edema on fluorescein angiography and vitreous haze (P < or =. 001).

CONCLUSIONS

Immune-recovery uveitis is an important cause of visual morbidity in HIV-infected patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Although immune recovery associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy has allowed some patients to discontinue specific anticytomegalovirus therapy, the rejuvenated immune response can be associated with sight-threatening inflammation.

Intravenous cidofovir for compassionate use in AIDS patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis. Spanish Cidofovir Study Group

We report the compassionate use of intravenous cidofovir for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in 51 patients with AIDS who were receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). After a median of 9 doses, 49 patients showed no retinitis activity. However, treatment was stopped in 17 patients because of adverse reactions and in 5 patients for other reasons. Two deaths were considered related to the drug. Iritis developed in 21 patients (41.2%), a frequency higher than that reported during the pre-HAART era. Patients with iritis had median CD4 cell counts-both at nadir and at the initiation of cidofovir therapy-approximately 3 times higher than those for patients without iritis (P=.003 and P=.05, respectively). Our study confirms the efficacy of cidofovir therapy for AIDS-associated cytomegalovirus retinitis. Our data suggest that the risk of iritis may be higher for patients with better immunological status, probably because of their enhanced ability to mount an inflammatory response.

Ocular toxicity associated with systemic drug therapy

Systemic drug-induced ocular side effects are increasing because of the vast numbers of new drugs being introduced. Reports of drug-induced ocular toxicity must be well documented, and other causes of these side effects must be ruled out to help establish causality. We reviewed the most recent reports of the most commonly used and newest systemic drugs that have been implicated in ocular toxicity. Using toxicologic criteria needed to establish causality, data from reports of ocular toxicity associated with systemic cidofovir (Vistide), sildenafil (Viagra), vigabatrin (Sabril), tamoxifen (Nolvadex), hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil)/chloroquine (Aralen), amiodarone (Cordarone), and lovastatin (Mevacor)/simvastatin (Zocor) were evaluated and summarized. The probability for causality was determined to be high for all these drugs except for vigabatrin and lovastatin/simvastatin. Methods for detecting, preventing, and treating ocular toxic reactions were then reviewed for each drug.

Ocular manifestations of HIV infection

Ophthalmic abnormalities are common in HIV-infected patients. Serious ophthalmic diseases often result from opportunistic infections and can cause blindness in the absence of prompt diagnosis and therapy. We review recent advances in the diagnosis and management of HIV-associated ocular disease, including cytomegalovirus retinitis, the leading cause of vision loss in HIV-infected patients. The widespread use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) over the past 3 years has reduced the morbidity and mortality associated with HIV infection. HAART has dramatically altered the incidence and natural history of many opportunistic infections, and we discuss the impact of HAART on ophthalmic disease.

Uveitis in patients treated with intravenous cidofovir

PURPOSE

To study the characteristics of uveitis occurring during intravenous cidofovir treatment for CMV retinitis in patients with AIDS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied ten cases (16 eyes) of uveitis in patients with CMV retinitis treated with intravenous cidofovir. All the patients had ophthalmologic examinations and, if required, fundus angiographies. The median follow-up was eight months.

RESULTS

Uveitis occurred after a mean of 8.5 infusions of cidofovir (range 2-17). All ten patients were on protease inhibitors. The mean CD4+ cell count was 92 +/- 51/microl and the median viral load was 3.9 log. All the eyes with uveitis had healed CMV retinitis. The first examination of the involved eyes showed inflammation of the anterior chamber (100%), vitritis (50%), posterior synechiae (75%), and low intraocular pressure (94%). Uveitis did not relapse in the seven patients who stopped cidofovir, whereas it relapsed in two of the three patients who did not stop treatment. At the end of follow-up, permanent posterior synechiae were present in 69% of the involved eyes.

COMMENTS

Cidofovir therapy necessitates slit-lamp surveillance, especially in patients on HAART. Cidofovir-related uveitis requires a local steroid treatment, but if possible, cidofovir should be withdrawn.

Anterior uveitis associated with intravenous cidofovir use in patients with cytomegalovirus retinitis

AIM

Intravenous cidofovir is used to treat cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis, and has been reported to cause anterior uveitis. Relations were sought between this complication and patient characteristics that might help predict its occurrence.

METHODS

17 patients with AIDS and CMV retinitis who were treated with intravenous cidofovir were identified, and the following data collected in a retrospective chart review: demographic characteristics, duration of CMV retinitis, retinal lesion characteristics, dose and duration of cidofovir therapy, tests of renal function, CD4+ T lymphocyte counts, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, iris colour, history of diabetes mellitus, and use of concomitant medications. Case-control analyses were performed to determine risk factors for developing cidofovir associated uveitis.

RESULTS

Anterior uveitis characterised by pain, ciliary injection, and decreased visual acuity occurred in 10 patients (59%). Median interval to development of uveitis was 11 doses of cidofovir. Symptoms developed 4.4 (SD 2.5) days (median 3.5) after an infusion of cidofovir. Patients who developed uveitis had a significantly greater rise in CD4+ T lymphocyte count while receiving cidofovir (68.4 (75.7) x10(6)/l versus 5.0 (0.6) x10(6)/l, (p = 0.04)). By stepwise linear regression, this factor accounted for 33% (p = 0.03) of the effect of developing uveitis. Mean follow up time, intraocular pressure decline during cidofovir therapy, serum creatinine and urine protein concentrations, and rates of protease inhibitor use were not significantly different between patients who developed uveitis and those who did not. Uveitis responded to topical corticosteroids and cycloplegia.

CONCLUSION

Anterior uveitis in patients receiving intravenous cidofovir therapy may be related to improving immune function. The uveitis responds to treatment and may not preclude continuation of cidofovir.

Cidofovir: a review of its use in cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with AIDS

Cidofovir is an antiviral nucleotide analogue with significant activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV) and other herpesviruses. The drug is indicated for the treatment of CMV retinitis, a sight-threatening condition, in patients with AIDS. Cidofovir has a long intracellular half-life which allows for a prolonged interval (2 weeks) between maintenance doses. In contrast, other intravenous treatment options for patients with CMV retinitis (i.e. ganciclovir and foscarnet) must be administered on a daily basis. The efficacy of intravenous cidofovir has been demonstrated in patients with AIDS and previously untreated CMV retinitis in multicentre randomised trials, and in a dose-finding study of cidofovir in patients with AIDS and previously treated relapsing CMV retinitis. Clinical trials have been relatively small (n < or = 100 patients) and no studies have been conducted directly comparing intravenous cidofovir with the more established intravenous agents, ganciclovir or foscarnet. Indirect comparisons of clinical trial data suggest that intravenous cidofovir may have similar efficacy to intravenous ganciclovir or foscarnet in delaying progression of CMV retinitis. However, such comparisons must be made with caution because of potential differences in patient populations, data analysis techniques and interobserver variability in the masked assessment of retinal photographs. Nevertheless, intravenous cidofovir offers a less intrusive administration regimen than intravenous ganciclovir or foscarnet because of its prolonged dosage interval. Since therapy is life-long, patients receiving daily intravenous ganciclovir or foscarnet (but not cidofovir) usually require an indwelling central venous catheter and are therefore at increased risk of serious infection. The relatively long dosage interval for cidofovir may also have favourable implications in terms of overall treatment costs and patient quality of life, although specific data are very limited. Potentially irreversible nephrotoxicity is the major treatment-limiting adverse event associated with intravenous cidofovir in patients with AIDS-related CMV retinitis. Anterior uveitis/iritis has been reported frequently with intravenous cidofovir in postmarketing reports and a small number of patients have developed hypotony. Other treatment options for CMV retinitis are also associated with serious adverse events, and selection of pharmacotherapy will depend on a number of factors including retinitis lesion characteristics, patient quality-of-life issues and efficacy and tolerability profiles of available therapies.

CONCLUSION

Although the extent of its use may be limited by its adverse event profile, cidofovir offers a useful addition to the limited number of drugs available for the treatment of CMV retinitis in patients with AIDS.

Changing trends in cytomegalovirus retinitis with triple therapy

PURPOSE

Cytomegalovirus retinitis (CMVR) has been the most common cause of visual loss in AIDS patients. We investigate whether the pattern of disease has changed since the introduction of triple therapy.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of all patients with CMVR in one teaching hospital HIV unit over a 2 year period (n = 24). This included the opthalmic and systemic findings, HIV and CMV treatment, survival after diagnosis and CD4 results.

RESULTS

There has been a marked decrease in the number of patients developing new CMVR: from 21 eyes (15 patients) to 4 eyes (4 patients) in two consecutive 12 month periods between January 1996 and December 1997, coinciding with the introduction of triple therapy in October 1996. Median survival has increased from 376 days in the deceased patients to 598 days in the survivors on triple therapy. Median time to CMVR relapse has lengthened from 79 to 179 days in the triple therapy cohort. The pattern of ocular morbidity in the 11 eyes of the 7 surviving patients is also changing, with no new zone 1 disease, and a marked rise in the incidence of uveitis, maculopathy and cataracts.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that triple therapy is associated with an increase in survival, a decrease in CMVR relapse and changes in ocular features. This transition has implications for current screening and treatment protocols.

Treatment of immune recovery vitritis with local steroids

AIMS

To report a series of patients requiring treatment for falling visual acuity associated with immune recovery vitritis, a recently described syndrome of a predominantly vitreous inflammatory reaction in patients with AIDS and cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis.

METHODS

The medical records of all patients requiring treatment for falling visual acuity associated with immune recovery vitritis were reviewed between March 1996 and March 1998.

RESULTS

Nine eyes in seven patients required treatment for falling visual acuity. All patients had inactive CMV retinitis and had received highly active antiretroviral treatment including a protease inhibitor. Vitreous inflammation developed at a mean of 5.5 months (range 1-14) after starting a protease inhibitor. The onset of inflammation correlated with a mean rise in CD4(+) lymphocyte levels of 83 x 10(6)/l (range 30-128). The visual acuity fell by a mean of 2.8 Snellen lines (range 1-4) before treatment, and rose by a mean of 1.9 Snellen lines (range 0-4) after treatment with orbital floor steroids. The mean time interval between treatment with orbital floor steroids and improvement in visual acuity was 3.5 weeks (range 1-8). Following treatment the visual acuity improved or remained stable in all nine eyes, eight eyes returning to within one line of their preinflammation Snellen visual acuity. No eyes developed reactivation or progression of CMV retinitis after treatment, and none developed any other pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Orbital floor steroids appear to be have a useful role in the treatment of persistent immune recovery vitritis where the visual acuity is compromised.