CD40 stimulation in vivo does not inhibit CD4+ T cell tolerance to soluble antigens

Functional maturation of lamina propria dendritic cells by activation of NKT cells mediates the abrogation of oral tolerance

We previously showed that although systemic administration of alpha-galactosylceramide (alphaGalCer) or agonistic anti-CD40 induced functional maturation of dendritic cells (DC) in mesenteric lymph nodes, only the former treatment succeeded in breaking the induction of oral tolerance. In this study, we looked for the essential factor responsible for the disruption of oral tolerance. We found that lamina propria (LP)-DC was responsible for the oral OVA presentation and that Peyer's patch was not essential for the induction of oral tolerance. Therefore, we investigated the role of LP-DC. Treatment with alphaGalCer but not with anti-CD40 induced the full maturation of LP-DC at an early time point. This functional activation of LP-DC was mediated by strong activation of NKT cells that reside abundantly in the small intestinal lamina propria (SI-LP) and interferon-gamma partially contributed to the LP-DC activation. LP-DC isolated from alphaGalCer-treated OVA-fed mice induced the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T cells into Th1 and Th2 and was associated with the reduced Foxp3+ population. In contrast, LP-DC isolated from anti-CD40-treated OVA-fed mice failed to generate Th cell differentiation but induced more Foxp3+ CD4+ T cells. Our results demonstrate that triggered by NKT cells in SI-LP, functional maturation of Ag-capturing DC from SI-LP is necessary for the abrogation of oral tolerance induction.

T cell-mediated oral tolerance is intact in germ-free mice

Commensal enteric bacteria stimulate innate immune cells and increase numbers of lamina propria and mesenteric lymph node (MLN) T and B lymphocytes. However, the influence of luminal bacteria on acquired immune function is not understood fully. We investigated the effects of intestinal bacterial colonization on T cell tolerogenic responses to oral antigen compared to systemic immunization. Lymphocytes specific for ovalbumin-T cell receptor (OVA-TCR Tg(+)) were transplanted into germ-free (GF) or specific pathogen-free (SPF) BALB/c mice. Recipient mice were fed OVA or immunized subcutaneously with OVA peptide (323-339) in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA). Although the efficiency of transfer was less in GF recipients, similar proportions of cells from draining peripheral lymph node (LN) or MLN were proliferating 3-4 days later in vivo in GF and SPF mice. In separate experiments, mice were fed tolerogenic doses of OVA and then challenged with an immunogenic dose of OVA 4 days later. Ten days after immunization, lymphocytes were restimulated with OVA in vitro to assess antigen-specific proliferative responses. At both high and low doses of OVA, cells from both SPF and GF mice fed OVA prior to immunization had decreased proliferation compared to cells from control SPF or GF mice. In addition, secretion of interferon (IFN)-gamma and interleukin (IL)-10 by OVA-TCR Tg(+) lymphocytes was reduced in both SPF and GF mice fed OVA compared to control SPF or GF mice. Unlike previous reports indicating defective humoral responses to oral antigen in GF mice, our results indicate that commensal enteric bacteria do not enhance the induction of acquired, antigen-specific T cell tolerance to oral OVA.

Split peripheral tolerance: CD40 ligation blocks tolerance induction for CD8 T?cells but not for CD4 T?cells in response to intestinal antigens

The role of antigen-presenting cells in the balance between immunity and tolerance to intestinal antigens remains poorly understood. In this study, we examined whether CD40 ligation affects the induction of CD4 and CD8 T cell tolerance in response to intestinal antigens. We show that an agonistic anti-CD40 mAb treatment did not block the induction of OVA-specific CD4 T cell tolerance, whereas this approach enabled strong priming of OVA-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTL), preventing CTL tolerance to intestinal antigen. Such CTL priming was independent of CD4 T cell help but required B7 costimulation. Co-administration of anti-CD40 mAb increased the synthesis of IL-2 and the expression of CD25 by CD8 T cells, but neither IL-2 production nor CD25 expression by CD4 T cells was enhanced by anti-CD40 mAb. However, neutralization of TGF-beta together with addition of agonistic anti-CD40 mAb was able to reverse CD4 T cell tolerance. These findings suggest that the induction of tolerance versus immunity against intestinal antigens is determined by the status of the antigen-presenting cells and that signals via CD40 differently regulate the outcome of CD4 and CD8 T cells in vivo.

Induction of Systemic Tolerance in Normal but not in Transgenic Mice Through Continuous Feeding of Ovalbumin

The ingestion of most dietary protein can cause systemic tolerance, and such tolerance is easier to induce in younger than in older mice. In this study, we examined whether oral tolerance to ovalbumin (OVA) could be induced in OVA-T-cell receptor (OVA-TCR)-specific transgenic mice. Continuous feeding or gavage with OVA induced tolerance, measured as reduced antibody production, in young and aged BALB/c mice, in a dose-dependent manner, but this effect was not observed in transgenic mice. Once BALB/c mice became tolerant, this state was maintained for over 44 weeks, although the tolerant state could be reversed by adoptive cell transfer. DO11.10 mice did not become tolerant upon continuous feeding with OVA, and the adoptive transfer of naïve cells increased the levels of specific antibodies in their sera after antigenic challenge. The immunization schedule used here leads to a Th2-dependent antibody response in normal BALB/c mice. However, the same schedule induced both Th1- and Th2-antibody responses in transgenic mice. Dendritic cells (DC) from tolerant BALB/c mice were less efficient in the induction of the proliferation of cocultured T cells from both BALB/c and DO11.10 mice, as well as Th1 [interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-gamma] and Th2 (IL-4 and IL-10) cytokine production. The DC from DO11.10 transgenic mice were equally efficient in the induction of T-cell proliferation in both normal and transgenic mice, as well as in the induction of Th1 and Th2 cytokines, whether or not the mice consumed OVA. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta secretion was significantly lower in the supernatants of T cells from both normal and transgenic mice cocultured with DC from DO11.10 mice that had consumed OVA, while it was significantly higher in the presence of DC from normal tolerant mice, thus implicating TGF-beta as a regulatory cytokine in oral tolerance in the murine model.

Gastrointestinal dendritic cells play a role in immunity, tolerance, and disease

Discrimination between beneficial commensal organisms and potentially harmful pathogens is a central component of the essential role that gut immune cells play in maintaining the balance between immune activation and tolerance. Antigen presenting cells (APC) are the key to this process, and the type of APC, including epithelial cells, B cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DC), in the gut is varied. The purpose of this review is to focus on the vast amount of data that has recently been generated on gastrointestinal dendritic cells in the context of their potential function and contribution to mucosal immunity, tolerance, and disease.

Co-administration of CD40 agonistic antibody and antigen fails to overcome the induction of oral tolerance

T-cell stimulation in the absence of a second, costimulatory signal can lead to anergy or deletion. There is growing evidence that peripheral tolerance to an exogenous antigen might be caused by the lack of costimulatory molecules on antigen-presenting cells (APCs). In the present study, we examined whether tolerance against orally administered antigen could be reversed by maturation of APCs via CD40 signalling. Monoclonal antibody (mAb) to CD40 efficiently induced costimulatory molecules on APCs. Treatment with anti-CD40 mAb potentiated the division of ovalbumin-specific T cells in response to oral ovalbumin in secondary lymphoid organs. However, such treatment did not prolong the presentation of oral ovalbumin on APCs. Surprisingly, treatment of anti-CD40 mAb at the time of oral administration of ovalbumin did not reverse the induction of tolerance to ovalbumin in either the high- or low-dose regimens. Furthermore, the induction of oral tolerance in our model is not the result of negative signalling by cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. These results indicate that tolerance for oral antigen could be established regardless of APC maturation by a CD40-specific mAb, suggesting that there could be a unique mechanism to regulate immunity versus tolerance to encountered antigen in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue.

Cell cycle block in anergic T cells during tolerance induction

The induction of anergy, or T cell unresponsiveness to antigen, is preceded by T cell activation and cell division in response to fed antigens. These events parallel the activation observed in T cells following sensitization with antigen and adjuvant. The events that distinguish eventual sensitization versus tolerance remain unclear. Using a T lymphocyte transfer model specific to OVA, we demonstrated previously that oral encounter with antigen leads to functional anergy. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells nevertheless become activated and cycle briefly after encounter with antigen. In this study, we measured the extent of cell cycling of antigen-specific T cells after oral encounter with their antigen. Whereas T cells cycle on the average of eight times in 4 days after conventional immunization, an abortive proliferation was observed in the draining LN T cells after oral encounter with antigen; OVA-specific T cells divided fewer times after exposure to fed OVA, compared to T cells in mice immunized with OVA. This abortive proliferation is antigen specific and not due to bystander suppression, as coadministration of an unrelated antigen that was previously used as a tolerogen does not alter the degree of abortive proliferation. Measurement of BrdU incorporation in mice that were previously fed ovalbumin indicates that up to 3 days following feeding, OVA-specific cells are actively cycling in vivo. However, by day 4, they have stopped cycling while identical T cells in OVA-sensitized mice continue to cycle. Our results indicate either that tolerance is a default pathway and a secondary stimulus is required at day 3 to progress to sensitization, or that elements that limit cell cycle progression are provided for tolerance induction.