A universal newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan

Does the duration matter? Effect of cochlear implantation on language development in Mandarin-speaking children with hearing loss

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have shown that cochlear implantation (CI) can influence language development in children with severe-to-profound hearing loss. However, whether the age of implantation and duration of CI use influence language development remains unclear, particularly in Mandarin-speaking children with hearing loss. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of CI-related variables on language development in these children.

METHODS

The present study recruited 133 Mandarin-speaking children with hearing loss, aged between 36 and 71 months chronologically, from a nonprofit organisation in Taiwan. The Revised Preschool Language Assessment (RPLA) was used to evaluate the children's language performance.

RESULTS

Children with hearing loss demonstrated delayed language comprehension and oral expression. Among them, 34% achieved age-appropriate language development. The duration of CI use had a significant direct effect on language-related abilities. Conversely, the age of implantation did not have a significant direct effect. Furthermore, the age of initial interventions (auditory-oral) had a significant direct effect only on language comprehension. Compared with the age of implantation, the duration of CI use was a significant mediator of language-related abilities.

CONCLUSION

In Mandarin-speaking children with late CIs, the duration of CI use is a more effective mediator of language development than the age of implantation.

Outcomes of Training Nurses Engaged in a Public Sector Newborn Hearing Screening Program in South India

This study evaluated the outcomes of training nurses engaged in a public sector newborn hearing screening (NHS) program in one urban district in South India. Twenty nurses performing NHS in Corporation Maternity Hospitals (CMH) participated in the training and evaluation. Baseline knowledge and skill of nurses regarding NHS and overall program outcomes were obtained eight months post the initial training. Knowledge was evaluated using questionnaire, skill was evaluated using Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and agreement between screening results obtained by audiologist and nurse. Records used for documentation of screening were analysed to evaluate program outcomes. A two-day retraining was designed to address the gaps identified. Evaluations were conducted immediately post and three months post retraining following the same procedure as baseline evaluations. Gaps were identified in knowledge and skill as well as in the program outcomes. Immediate post retraining evaluation results showed overall improvement in nurses' knowledge and skill. Three months post retraining, all the nurses achieved benchmark criteria of 75% in knowledge and skill. Program outcomes, such as coverage (95.3%), refer rate (3.2%) and follow up rate (86.1%) improved post retraining. The findings of this study suggests that knowledge and skill of nurses improved with periodic training. Periodic evaluation and monitoring enhanced the overall outcomes of the program.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-021-02920-2.

Comparison of Two-Step Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and One-Step Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Universal Newborn Hearing Screening Programs in Remote Areas of China

Objective: To compare the hearing screening results of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and one-step automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR) in non-risk newborns, and to explore a more suitable hearing screening protocol for infants discharged within 48 h after birth in remote areas of China. Methods: To analyze the age effect on pass rate for hearing screening, 2005 newborns were divided into three groups according to screening time after birth: <24, 24-48, and 48-72 h. All subjects received TEOAE + AABR test as first hearing screen, and those who failed in any test were rescreened with TEOAE + AABR at 6 weeks after birth. The first screening results of AABR and TEOAE were compared among the three groups. The results of two-step TEOAE screening and one-step AABR screening were compared for newborns who were discharged within 48 h. The time spent on screening was recorded for TEOAE and AABR. Results: The pass rate of TEOAE and AABR increased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05), and the false positive rate decreased significantly with the increase of first screening time (P < 0.05). The failure rate of first screening of AABR within 48 h was 7.31%, which was significantly lower than that of TEOAE (9.93%) (P < 0.05). The average time spent on AABR was 12.51 ± 6.36 min, which was significantly higher than that of TEOAE (4.05 ± 1.56 min, P < 0.05). The failure rate of TEOAE two-step screening was 1.59%, which was significantly lower than one-step AABR. Conclusions: Compared with TEOAE, AABR screening within 48 h after birth can reduce the failure rate and false positive rate of first screening. However, compared with TEOAE two-step screening, one-step AABR screening has higher referral rate for audiological diagnosis. In remote areas of China, especially in hospitals with high delivery rate, one-step AABR screening is not feasible, and two-step TEOAE screening protocol is still applicable to UNHS screening as more and more infants discharged within 48 h after birth.

Newborn hearing screening and early auditory-based treatment in Taiwan: action trends of families with children who are hearing impaired

OBJECTIVE

To explore the trends in actions and factors influencing families of children with hearing loss, regarding early treatment following the implementation of a newborn hearing screening (NHS) in Taiwan.

DESIGN

A retrospective study was conducted by extracting data from the treatment histories of families with children who had hearing loss and who were contacted and assessed by the non-profit organisation (NPO). Children born between 2012 and 2018 were included. The time lapse between initial NHS and early treatment sought by each family was documented and the factors predicting the timing of those actions were identified.

STUDY SAMPLE

Data of 2095 families of children with hearing loss and who received treatment from an NPO for the annual birth cohort of 2012 through 2018 were included.

RESULTS

The median age at treatments initiation improved through the years. Parental educational level and the child's degree of hearing loss were significant indicators of the child's initial age at treatment intervention, age when hearing aids were fitted, and days taken to contact the organisation.

CONCLUSION

The NHS in Taiwan promoted earlier treatment for children with hearing loss. Furthermore, patient instructions and education may be important to enable parents to take actions for early intervention.

Using click-evoked auditory brainstem response thresholds in infants to estimate the corresponding pure-tone audiometry thresholds in children referred from UNHS

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether behavioral pure-tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds in children can be accurately estimated from the corresponding infants' click-evoked auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds through a retrospective review of data from a universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) program in Taiwan.

METHOD

According to medical records from Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei Hospital District, 45,450 newborns received hearing screening during January 1999-December 2011. Among these newborns, 104 (82, both ears; 22, one ear; total, 186 ears) received regular follow-up and were recruited as subjects. The relationship between infant click-evoked ABR thresholds and the corresponding child PTA thresholds was determined through Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient between click-evoked ABR thresholds and behavioral PTA thresholds at the average of frequencies of 1-4 and 2-4 kHz was 0.76 and 0.76, respectively. Linear regression analysis showed that behavioral audiometry thresholds at the average of frequencies of 1-4 and 2-4 kHz were accurately estimated from click-evoked ABR thresholds in 57% and 58% children, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Click-evoked ABR testing is a reliable tool to cautiously estimate behavioral PTA thresholds at the average of frequencies of 1-4 and 2-4 kHz. For accurately performing hearing aid fitting and auditory rehabilitation in congenitally deaf infants, a combination of frequency-specific tone-burst ABR and click-evoked ABR should be used.

The universal newborn hearing screening program in a public hospital: The importance of the day of examination

OBJECTIVES

Newborn hearing screening programs are already implemented in many countries worldwide. Nonetheless there is still no consensus about the most proper post-birth day of examination. The purpose of this study was to assess the most appropriate day of universal hearing screening program in a public hospital.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted in "Attiko University National Health System Hospital" and included 2494 newborns. They were examined before discharge from the hospital, using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs).

RESULTS

From 2494 neonates included in the study, 2129 (85.4%) bilaterally passed the screening examination, while 365 (14.6%) failed the test. Higher levels of "pass" result per day of life were presented the third (90%) and fourth (94%) day of life. These days the referral scores were lower, reaching 6% the 4th post-birth day.

CONCLUSION

All infants should be screened for their hearing in the first days of life as otoacoustic emissions can be recorded from the first 24 h of life. If the babies stay in the maternity unit for more that 1-2 days for any reason (protocol of the maternity unit, parents leave in remote areas, etc.) we recommend the 4th day of life as the most appropriate day of examination in order to minimize the false positive ("refer") results at the initial examination.

Economic evaluation of long-term impacts of universal newborn hearing screening

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the long-term efficacious and economic impacts of universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS).

DESIGN

An analytical Markov decision model was framed with two screening strategies: UNHS with transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) test and automatic acoustic brainstem response (aABR) test against no screening. By estimating intervention and long-term costs on treatment and productivity losses and the utility of life years determined by the status of hearing loss, we computed base-case estimates of the incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs). The scattered plot of ICUR and acceptability curve was used to assess the economic results of aABR versus TEOAE or both versus no screening.

STUDY SAMPLE

A hypothetical cohort of 200,000 Taiwanese newborns.

RESULTS

TEOAE and aABR dominated over no screening strategy (ICUR = $-4800.89 and $-4111.23, indicating less cost and more utility). Given $20,000 of willingness to pay (WTP), the probability of being cost-effective of aABR against TEOAE was up to 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

UNHS for hearing loss with aABR is the most economic option and supported by economically evidence-based evaluation from societal perspective.

Auditory stimulation modulates CXCL12/CXCR4 expression in postnatal development of the newborn rat cochlea

Sensorineural hearing loss is one of the most common sensory deficits. Recently, inner-ear stem cell therapy has been proposed for auditory afferent rehabilitation. CXCR4 is the primary physiologic receptor for CXC chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) and the CXCL12-CXCR4 pathway has been implicated in the process of migration, differentiation, and maturation of vertebrate neural stem cells. In this study, we examined changes in the auditory brainstem response and CXCL12/CXCR4 expression in newborn rat cochleae under different acoustic environments by quantitative real-time PCR, western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence analyses. Rats were divided randomly into three groups: the augmented acoustic environment (AAE) group, the auditory deprivation (AD) group, and the control group. Auditory brainstem response thresholds were markedly increased in the AAE group and in the AD group. Compared with postnatal day 1, the expression of CXCL12/CXCR4 mRNA and protein under normal acoustic conditions was increased on postnatal day 14 and then decreased on postnatal day 28 in the cochlea. However, on postnatal day 28, CXCL12/CXCR4 expression, as well as its spatiotemporal distribution as detected by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence assays, was augmented by AAE treatment and inhibited by AD treatment. Therefore, our results confirmed that auditory stimulation influenced the spatiotemporal expression of CXCL12/CXCR4 in newborn rat cochlea, which might help to unravel the role of the CXCL12-CXCR4 pathway in the synaptic contacts and hearing function establishment in rat cochlea development.

Comparison of Newborn Hearing Screening in Well-Baby Nursery and NICU: A Study Applied to Reduce Referral Rate in NICU

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether newborn hearing screening in a well-baby nursery (WBN) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nursery: 1) meet three targeted, screening, referral, and diagnostic follow-up rates; 2) compare the average age of diagnosis for infants admitted to the WIN and NICU; and 3) determine prevalence of hearing loss in neonatal population; and 4) try to find a practical newborn hearing screening time algorithm to reduce refer rate in NICU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It examined 15,624 newborns in the WBN (13,676) and NICU (1948) screened for congenital HL using AABR. The variables analyzed in it were the screening rate, referral rate, follow-up rate, diagnostic rate and diagnostic age, prevalence rate, degrees of congenital bilateral HL. The study was approved by the hospital's institutional review board (13MMHISO23).

RESULTS

The screening rates were 99.8% and 99.6% in the WBN and NICU groups, respectively, without significant difference. The referral rates were 0.7% and 2.8% in the WBN and NICU groups, with significant difference. Furthermore, the diagnostic follow-up rates were 76.7% and 89.1% in the WBN and NICU groups, without significant difference. The average initial diagnostic ages were 1.9 months and 3.8 months in the WBN and NICU groups, with significant difference. The prevalence of congenital bilateral hearing loss were 0.27% and 1.6% in the WBN and NICU groups, with significant difference.

CONCLUSION

The screening, referral and follow-up rate in the WBN and NICU groups were equivalent to the quality indicators. For NICU group, screening and diagnostic follow up were performed later than those in WBN group; however the lower referral rate in our NICU group was successfully achieved in this study and can be applied clinically. The prevalence of congenital bilateral hearing loss was higher in the NICU group than in the WBN group.

Main outcomes of a newborn hearing screening program in Belgium over six years

OBJECTIVE

To present the outcomes of the newborn hearing screening program in Belgium (French-speaking area) since its implementation and to analyze its evolution between 2007 and 2012 in the neonatal population without reported risk factors for hearing loss.

METHODS

The study was descriptive and based on a retrospective analysis of six annual databases (2007-2012) from the newborn hearing screening program. The main outcomes were identified: prevalence of reported hearing impairment; coverage rates (first and second test, follow-up); proportions of conclusive screening tests; referral rate. Each outcome was presented for the six years and by year of birth. Chi-squares were used to study differences in the various outcomes according to time.

RESULTS

Over the six years, 264,508 newborns were considered as eligible for the screening. Hearing impairment was confirmed in 1.41‰ (n = 374) of them, with significant disparities from year to year, between 0.67‰ and 1.94‰. Analysis of the screening process showed that only 92.71% (n = 245,219) of the eligible newborns underwent a first hearing test. This coverage rate varied greatly over time: at the beginning, less than 90% of the newborns had a first test and it rose to almost 95%. After the two screening steps, 2.40% (n = 6340) of the newborns were referred to an ENT doctor; the referral rate slightly decreased during the first years of the program and then stabilized around 2.4%. Over the period, only 62.21% of the referred newborns had a follow-up; the follow-up rate was particularly low for the first year (44.91%) and then strongly increased (+19.52% in 2008) but never exceeded 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome measures for the newborn hearing screening program in Belgium are lower than the benchmarks released by the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Nevertheless, the evolution of the outcome measures since the implementation of the program has been positive, particularly during the first years. At some point, most of the outcome measures decreased or at least did not change any further. The motivation and commitment of the professionals have to be supported in a variety of ways to improve outcome measures and thus, the quality of the program.

Otoacoustic emissions in newborn hearing screening: a systematic review of the effects of different protocols on test outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Otoacoustic emission (OAE) tests are currently used to screen newborns for congenital hearing loss in many Universal Newborn Hearing Screening programs. However, there are concerns about high referral and false-positive rates. Various protocols have been used to address this problem. The main objective of this review is to determine the effects of different screening protocols on the referral rates and positive predictive values (PPV) of the OAE newborn screening test.

METHODS

Eligible studies published in English from January 1990 until August 2012 were identified through searches of MEDLINE, Medline In-Process, Embase, PubMed (NCBI), ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of clinical controlled trials. Two reviewers independently screened the data sources, using pre-defined inclusion criteria to generate a list of eligible articles. Data extracted included the number of newborns screened, age at screening, OAE pass criteria, frequencies screened, number of retests, referral rates, and the number of newborns identified with permanent congenital hearing loss.

RESULTS

Ten articles met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 119,714 newborn participants. The pooled referral rate was 5.5%. Individual referral rates ranged from 1.3% to 39%; the PPV from 2 to 40%. Increasing the age at initial screening and performing retests reduced the referral rate. Likewise, screenings involving higher frequencies had lower referral rates.

CONCLUSION

Delaying newborn hearing screening improves test results but may not be practical in all contexts. The use of higher frequencies and more sophisticated OAE devices may be useful approaches to ensure better performance of the OAE test in newborn hearing screening.

Epileptiform electroencephalogram abnormality in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss

OBJECTIVES

This work was designed to study electroencephalogram findings in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss and correlate these findings with the SNHL parameters as duration, etiology, severity, and type.

METHODS

Ninety children with bilateral congenital sensorineural hearing loss served as the study group. They were free from any neurological disorders or symptoms that are commonly associated with abnormal electroencephalogram as convulsions or loss of consciousness. Twenty children having normal hearing with no history of otological or neurological disorders served as the control group. All children participating in the study were subjected to full medical and audiological history, otological examination, neurological examination, audiological evaluation and electroencephalogram recording.

RESULTS

Mean age of the children in the control group was 3.56 ± 2.1 years and mean age of the children in the study group was 3.8 ± 2.2 years. While none of the control children had abnormal electroencephalogram, 38 (42.2%) of children with congenital SNHL had epileptiform electroencephalogram abnormality. The epileptiform abnormality was generalized in 14 children (36.8%), focal temporal in 17 children (44.7%) and focal other than temporal in 7 children (18.4%). According to the hemispheric side affected, the abnormality was right in 14 children (36.8%), left in 10 children (26.3%) and bilateral in 14 children (36.8%). No statistically significant predominance of specific site or side of the epileptiform abnormality was found. Similarly, no statistical significant prevalent of the epileptiform abnormality was found in relation to the age or sex of children, duration of hearing loss or etiology of hearing loss (i.e., genetic vs. neonatal insults). On the other hand, the epileptiform abnormality was statistically prevalent in children with moderate degree of hearing loss, and in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

The epileptiform electroencephalogram abnormality is a common finding in children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss especially those with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder, suggesting the affection of the central nervous system despite the absence of neurological symptoms or signs. These findings raise the question of the requirement of medical treatment for those children and the effect of such treatment in their rehabilitation.

The effectiveness of the promotion of newborn hearing screening in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

Hearing is a critical ability for the development of a child's speech and language. Many studies in different countries have shown the universal newborn hearing screening and early intervention has greatly reduced the negative impact caused by congenital hearing loss. The first universal newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan took place in MacKay Memorial Hospital in 1998 and was subsequently endorsed by the government. The incidence of bilateral congenital hearing impairment in Taiwan is approximately 2.6 per 1000 live birth. The aim of this paper is to analyze the age of diagnosis, hearing aid fitting, and intervention of congenitally hearing impaired children with and without hearing screening after public awareness and government endorsement of newborn hearing screening.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There were 263 hearing impaired children participated in this study, receiving their auditory habilitation therapy at Children's Hearing Foundation from 2006 to 2010. 114 of those children went through newborn hearing screening and 149 without it. The age of diagnosis, hearing aid fitting, and auditory intervention were compared between these two groups. The age of diagnosis and intervention of congenitally hearing impaired children among different years were analyzed too.

RESULTS

The average age of diagnosis was 8.7 months, the age of hearing aid fitting was 12.4 months and age of auditory intervention was 18.8 months for the group of hearing impaired children with newborn hearing screening. For hearing impaired children without newborn screening, their average age of diagnosis was 27.5 months; age of hearing aid fitting was 31.3 months and age of auditory intervention was 40.5 months. There were significant differences in the age of diagnosis, hearing aid fitting and auditory intervention between congenitally hearing impaired children with and without hearing screening.

CONCLUSIONS

This research indicates that newborn hearing screening facilitates early identification, diagnosis and intervention of congenitally hearing impaired children in Taiwan. The age of identification, diagnosis and intervention of congenital hearing impaired children has also been reduced gradually over the years after government endorsement of newborn hearing screening in Taiwan.

Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing

BACKGROUND

Although migrant workers account for the majority of newborns in Beijing, their children are less likely to undergo appropriate universal newborn hearing screening/rescreening (UNHS) than newborns of local non-migrant residents. We hypothesised that this was at least in part due to the inadequacy of the UNHS protocol currently employed for newborn babies, and therefore aimed to modify the protocol to specifically reflect the needs of the migrant population.

METHODS

A total of 10,983 healthy babies born to migrant mothers between January 2007 and December 2009 at a Beijing public hospital were investigated for hearing abnormalities according to a modified UNHS protocol. This incorporated two additional/optional otoacoustic emissions (OAE) tests at 24-48 hours and 2 months after birth. Infants not passing a screening test were referred to the next test, until any hearing loss was confirmed by the auditory brainstem response (ABR) test.

RESULTS

A total of 98.91% (10983/11104) of all newborn children underwent the initial OAE test, of which 27.22% (2990/10983) failed the test. 1712 of the failed babies underwent the second inpatient OAE test, with739 failing again; thus significantly decreasing the overall positive rate for abnormal hearing from 27.22% to 18.36% ([2990-973 /10983)]; p = 0). Overall, 1147(56.87%) babies underwent the outpatient OAE test again after1-month, of whom 228 failed and were referred for the second outpatient OAE test (i.e. 2.08% (228/10983) referral rate at 1month of age). 141 of these infants underwent the referral test, of whom 103 (73.05%) tested positive again and were referred for a final ABR test for hearing loss (i.e. final referral rate of 1.73% ([228-38/10983] at 2 months of age). Only 54 infants attended the ABR test and 35 (0.32% of the original cohort tested) were diagnosed with abnormal hearing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that it is feasible and practical to achieve high coverage rates for screening hearing loss and decrease the referral rates in newborn babies of migrant workers, using a modification of the currently employed UNHS protocol.

Universal newborn hearing screening, a revolutionary diagnosis of deafness: real benefits and limitations

The finding that early detection of permanent congenital childhood hearing loss produces worthwhile benefit in terms of improved speech and language provides the rationale for the universal screening of newborns. The aim of the present study is to collect the current evidence with regard to the efficacy, the results and outcomes of universal hearing screening programs. An extensive search of the literature was performed in Medline and other available database sources. Study selection was based on the evaluation of the protocols used and the assessment of their efficacy in the early diagnosis of congenital hearing impairment. The initial referral rate and the rate of false positives were also evaluated. A total of 676,043 screened children have been identified in 20 studies. The average initial referral rate in these studies was 3.89%. The initial referral rate varied from 0.6 to 16.7%. The lost-to-follow-up rates varied from 3.7 to 65%. Although universal hearing screening is now widely adopted, there are still some serious drawbacks and limitations. False positives rates remain considerably high when newborns are screened with TEOAE's. The combination of TEOAE's and a-ABR provides a significantly reduced referral rate. Close cooperation between audiological centres and maternity units and a dedicated secretariat team are of paramount importance with regard to the reliability and efficacy of universal hearing screening.

Effect of identification and intervention age on language development for Mandarin-speaking deaf children with high family involvement

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to assess the language ability between early-intervention and later-intervention Mandarin-speaking deaf children, who have normal cognition and high family involvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

There are 29 subjects enrolled. 11 born deaf children received early intervention (7 HA and 4 CI) before 6 months old as study group. Another 18 born deaf children received later intervention (11 HA and 7 CI) between 7 and 35 months old as reference group. They were all regarded as with normal cognition and high family involvement. Their mean assessment age was 50 months old in early group and 51 months old in later group. We used several tools to test their perceptive vocabulary size, to evaluate perceptive language syntax and to compare perceptive and expressive language scores.

RESULTS

Our study revealed there are significant difference between these two groups in the ability of vocabulary size, perceptive language syntax and perceptive language scores. The results showed there is no significant difference between these two groups in their expressive language scores, although their achievement score is higher in the early group.

CONCLUSIONS

It clearly showed the ability of perceptive language in early-intervention deaf children was better than that of later-intervention. The ability of their expressive language showed no difference between them.

Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs

OBJECTIVE

Both transitory auditory otoemissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem responses (AABR) are considered adequate methods for universal hearing screening. The goal of this study was to compare the results obtained with each device, applying the same screening procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2001 to 2003, all the newborns in our health area (2454 infants) were evaluated with TEOAE (ILO92, otodynamics) and all those born from 2004 to 2006 (3117) were evaluated with AABR (AccuScreen, Fischer-Zoth). The population studied included all well newborns and those admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU). The first screening was normally undertaken with well babies during the first 48h of life, before hospital discharge. Infants referred from this first step underwent a second screening after hospital discharge, before they were a month old.

RESULTS

The results from each study group were compared and analyzed for significant differences. TEOAE screening yielded 10.2% fail results from the first screening step; AABR gave 2.6%. In the second screening step, 2% of the newborns screened with TEOAE were referred, whereas 0.32% of those screened with AABR were referred. These differences are statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Although AABR screening tests involve a slightly higher cost in time and money than TEOAE, the results obtained compensate this difference. AABR gives fewer false positives and a lower referral rate; the percent of infants lost during follow-up is consequently smaller. Therefore, in our environment, universal newborn auditory screening with AABR is more effective than that with TEOAE.

Hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening for early detection of permanent congenital hearing loss in Lagos, Nigeria

OBJECTIVE

To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening programme for the early detection of permanent congenital or early-onset hearing loss (PCEHL) in Lagos, Nigeria.

METHODS

A cross-sectional pilot study based on a two-stage universal newborn hearing screening by non-specialist health workers using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem-response (AABR) in an inner-city maternity hospital over a consecutive period of 40 weeks. The main outcome measures were the practicality of screening by non-specialist staff with minimal training, functionality of screening instruments in an inner-city environment, screening coverage, referral rate, return rate for diagnosis, yield of PCEHL and average age of PCEHL confirmation.

RESULTS

Universal hearing screening of newborns by non-specialist staff without prior audiological experience is feasible in an inner-city environment in Lagos after a training period of two-weeks. Notwithstanding excessive ambient noise within and outside the wards, it was possible to identify a test site for TEOAE screening within the hospital. The screening coverage was 98.7% (1330/1347) of all eligible newborns and the mean age of screening was 2.6 days. Forty-four babies out of the 1274 who completed the two-stage screening were referred yielding a referral rate of 3.5%. Only 16% (7/44) of babies scheduled for diagnostic evaluation returned and all were confirmed with hearing loss resulting in an incidence of 5.5 (7/1274) per 1000 live births or a programme yield of 5.3 (7/1330) per 1000. Six infants had bilateral hearing loss and the degree was severe (> or =70 dB nHL) in three infants, moderate (40 dB nHL) in one infant and mild (<40 dB nHL) in two infants. The age at diagnosis ranged from 46 days to 360 days and only two infants were diagnosed within 90 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital-based universal hearing screening of newborns before discharge is feasible in Nigeria. Non-specialist staff are valuable in achieving a satisfactory referral rate with a two-stage screening protocol. However, a more efficient tracking and follow-up system is needed to improve the return rate for diagnosis and age of confirmation of hearing loss.

Progress towards early detection services for infants with hearing loss in developing countries

BACKGROUND

Early detection of infants with permanent hearing loss through infant hearing screening is recognised and routinely offered as a vital component of early childhood care in developed countries. This article investigates the initiatives and progress towards early detection of infants with hearing loss in developing countries against the backdrop of the dearth of epidemiological data from this region.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, descriptive study based on responses to a structured questionnaire eliciting information on the nature and scope of early hearing detection services; strategies for financing services; parental and professional attitudes towards screening; and the performance of screening programmes. Responses were complemented with relevant data from the internet and PubMed/Medline.

RESULTS

Pilot projects using objective screening tests are on-going in a growing number of countries. Screening services are provided at public/private hospitals and/or community health centres and at no charge only in a few countries. Attitudes amongst parents and health care workers are typically positive towards such programmes. Screening efficiency, as measured by referral rate at discharge, was generally found to be lower than desired but several programmes achieved other international benchmarks. Coverage is generally above 90% but poor follow-up rates remain a challenge in some countries. The mean age of diagnosis is usually less than six months, even for community-based programmes.

CONCLUSION

Lack of adequate resources by many governments may limit rapid nationwide introduction of services for early hearing detection and intervention, but may not deter such services altogether. Parents may be required to pay for services in some settings in line with the existing practice where healthcare services are predominantly financed by out-of-pocket spending rather than public funding. However, governments and their international development partners need to complement current voluntary initiatives through systematic scaling-up of public awareness and requisite manpower development towards sustainable service capacities at all levels of healthcare delivery.

Sensorineural hearing loss in children

During the past three to four decades, the incidence of acquired sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in children living in more developed countries has fallen, as a result of improved neonatal care and the widespread implementation of immunisation programmes. The overall decrease has been accompanied by a relative increase in the proportion of inherited forms of SNHL. The contribution made by one gene in particular, GJB2, to the genetic load of SNHL has strongly affected the assessment and care of children with hearing loss. These changes in the incidence of SNHL have not been seen in children living in less developed countries, where the prevalence of consanguinity is high in many areas, and both genetic and acquired forms of SNHL are more common, particularly among children who live in poverty. Focused genetic counselling and health education might lead to a decrease in the prevalence of inherited SNHL in these countries. Establishment of vaccination programmes for several vaccine-preventable infectious diseases would reduce rates of acquired SNHL. Although the primary purpose of such programmes is the prevention of serious and in many cases fatal infections, a secondary benefit would be a reduction in disease-related complications such as SNHL that cause permanent disability in survivors.

Despistaje de la hipoacusia neonatal: resultados después de 3 años de iniciar nuestro programa

Since the 90s there increasing interest in early detection of neonatal hearing loss due to the feasibility of universal neonatal screening as well as to the possibility of early intervention. This has led to set up neonatal screening programs based upon otoacoustic emissions and to a great increase in the number of publications in the field. Our hospital started a neonatal hearing loss screening program using otoacoustic emission in March 2000. We used a Capella Cochlear Emissions (MADSEN electronics) equipment. Until May 2003 we have performed the test in 6372 children with a median age of 71 days. In our study, the sensibility of the test was 90.9% and the specificity 99.7%. Our results are similar to those reported in the literature although the age of the children was higher and we have found an incidence of hearing loss lower than other studies.

Benefits and challenges of newborn hearing screening for developing countries

The late detection of permanent congenital and early-onset hearing loss (PCEHL) often has severe effects on linguistic, speech, cognitive and educational development in affected children. Since newborn hearing screening (NHS) allows most PCEHL to be detected early enough for optimal intervention, the prospects of its introduction in the developing world are reviewed in this paper. It is observed that a simple generalisation on the feasibility of NHS for the developing countries seems inappropriate in view of the diversities in the health and socio-economic status of these countries and the recent favourable reports of universal newborn hearing screening from the region. NHS empowers parents to make timely choices that will allow their hearing impaired children to be given a good start in life and be fully integrated into the wider community. It also compels attention towards the development of essential hearing healthcare services, besides the specific documented benefits. Existing child-healthcare structures such as the expanded programme on immunisation (EPI), baby friendly hospital initiatives (BFHI) and integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) provide opportunities for the introduction of some form of NHS in many of these countries where routine or systematic childhood hearing screening does not exist. Limited funding, manpower shortages, inadequate support services, low public awareness and the uncertainty regarding the commitment from healthcare practitioners may present some challenges but these are not insurmountable. Pilot studies are necessary in each country to provide empirical data that will guide healthcare providers who wish to introduce such a programme at any level of healthcare delivery.

Community-based newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

Congenital bilateral hearing impairment occurs in approximately 1 in every 1000 live births. Universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) programs are the most effective method for early diagnosis. Previously, newborn hearing screenings in Taiwan were often hospital-based. Our study is a community-based program designed to test the feasibility of performing neonatal hearing screening with a pay-for-test model, and to evaluate its acceptability to parents.

METHODS

From March 2000 to December 2002, two hospitals and four obstetric clinics in Tainan city participated in this study. The subjects were healthy newborns whose parents agreed to pay for otoacoustic emissions (OAE) hearing screening. They were tested in the newborn nursery before discharge. The protocol used an initial transient evoked otoacoustic emissions screening followed by a diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) test.

RESULTS

A total of 10,008 healthy neonates were recruited, and 5938 newborns (59.3%) were tested. Prior to hospital discharge, 5403 of the newborns (91.0%) had passed the transient evoked otoacoustic emissions test. Referral for further testing was made in 9.0% of cases (535/5938). There were 140 babies lost to 1-month follow up. Only 395 infants (73.8%) of the infants that failed their first otoacoustic emissions tests underwent a second session at the outpatient clinic, and 91 babies failed. They were referred for further auditory brainstem response testing. Ultimately, nine babies were diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).

CONCLUSIONS

There are difficulties in performing universal newborn hearing screening within Taiwan's health insurance system. This study was performed with the cooperation of hospitals and obstetric clinics, and was undertaken with a pay-for-screening model. Our program, with a pay-for-test model, of newborn hearing screening is feasible and was well regarded by parents in Tainan city. It could be run without the government's financial support.