A cost-effectiveness analysis of the high risk register and auditory brainstem response

Factors associated with delayed referral and hearing rehabilitation for congenital sensorineural hearing loss

OBJECTIVES

To identify the impact of social determinants of health and clinical status on referral and intervention for congenital sensorineural hearing loss.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review of children with confirmed sensorineural or mixed hearing loss between 2013 and 2021 at a single academic medical institution.

METHODS

Referral rates and timing for hearing rehabilitation, rates and timing of completed evaluation, and rate and timing of amplification were recorded. Patient demographics included gestational age, race, ethnicity, sex, hearing loss severity, and CMV status.

RESULTS

There were 216 children with confirmed sensorineural or mixed hearing loss, of which 77 had a unilateral hearing loss and 89 a severe or profound hearing loss. Delayed referral for hearing aid evaluation was noted in premature patients (median 375 days premature, median 147 term; p < 0.01) and publicly insured patients (median 215 days, median 123 private; p = 0.04). Delayed time to hearing aid fitting was noted for non-white patients (median 325 days, median 203 white patients; p < 0.01), publicly insured patients (median 309 days, median 212 private insurance; p < 0.02), and premature patients (median 462 days, median 224 term; p = 0.03). White patients were more likely to be referred for cochlear implant (p = 0.03).Privately insured patients and patients with a positive CMV test were more likely to be referred for cochlear implant evaluation, be seen in the cochlear implant clinic, and undergo implantation (p < 0.05). Non-white patients had a delay in cochlear implantation referral (median 928 days, median 398 days white patients; p = 0.05). Prolonged interval between evaluation in cochlear implant clinic to implantation was noted for privately insured patients (median 125 days; median 78 days publicly insured; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Sociodemographic factors were significantly associated with hearing amplification referral rates and time until amplification for children with identified congenital sensorineural hearing loss. For cochlear implantation, insurance type, CMV status were significantly associated with rate and timing of cochlear implant pathway.

Economic Evaluations of Childhood Hearing Loss Screening Programmes: A Systematic Review and Critique

BACKGROUND

Permanent childhood hearing loss is one of the most common birth conditions associated with speech and language delay. A hearing screening can result in early detection and intervention for hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES

To update and expand previous systematic reviews of economic evaluations of childhood hearing screening strategies, and explore the methodological differences.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane database, National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health's (CADTH) Grey matters.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Economic evaluations reporting costs and outcomes for both the intervention and comparator arms related to childhood hearing screening strategies.

RESULTS

Thirty evaluations (from 29 articles) were included for review. Several methodological issues were identified, including: few evaluations reported outcomes in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); none estimated utilities directly from surveying children; none included disutilities and costs associated with adverse events; few included costs and outcomes that differed by severity; few included long-term estimates; none considered acquired hearing loss; some did not present incremental results; and few conducted comprehensive univariate or probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Evaluations published post-2011 were more likely to report QALYs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) as outcome measures, include long-term treatment and productivity costs, and present incremental results.

LIMITATIONS

We were unable to access the economic models and, although we employed an extensive search strategy, potentially not all relevant economic evaluations were identified.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Most economic evaluations concluded that childhood hearing screening is value for money. However, there were significant methodological limitations with the evaluations.

The cost-effectiveness of universal newborn screening for bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Universal newborn hearing screening for bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment is standard practice in many developed economies, but until there is clear evidence of cost-effectiveness, it remains a controversial use of limited health care resources. We conducted a formal systematic review of studies of newborn hearing screening that considered both costs and outcomes to produce a summary of the available evidence and to determine whether there was a need for further research.

METHODS

A search was conducted of medical and nursing databases and gray literature websites by the use of multiple keywords. The titles and abstracts of studies were examined for preliminary inclusion if reference was made to newborn hearing screening, and to both costs and outcomes. Studies of potential relevance were independently assessed by 2 health economists for final inclusion in the review. Studies that met inclusion criteria were appraised by the use of existing guidelines for observational studies, economic evaluations and decision analytic models, and reported in a narrative literature review.

RESULTS

There were 22 distinct observational or modeled evaluations of which only 2 clearly compared universal newborn hearing screening to risk factor screening for bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment. Of these, the single evaluation that examined long-term costs and outcomes found that universal newborn hearing screening could be cost-saving if early intervention led to a substantial reduction in future treatment costs and productivity losses.

CONCLUSIONS

There are only a small number of economic evaluations that have examined the long-term cost-effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening. This is partly attributable to ongoing uncertainty about the benefits gained from the early detection and treatment of bilateral permanent congenital hearing impairment. There is a clear need for further research on long-term costs and outcomes to establish the cost-effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening in relation to other approaches to screening, and to establish whether it is a good long term investment.

A Case Study of an Emerging Community-Based Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program: Part I. Parents’ Compliance

Purpose

This is the first of a 2-part series of articles that describe and assess an emerging community-based early hearing detection and intervention program. This study investigated parents’ compliance for accessing services for their infants at 5 levels in the process from referrals through subsequent follow-up during a 3-year period. Compliance was defined as parents’ follow-through with professionals’ recommendations and appointments for their infants’ hearing health care.

Method

Investigators retrospectively reviewed the charts of 51 infants who were referred from a regional hospital’s newborn hearing screening program to a private practice office and were seen from March 2000 to February 2003.

Results

Compliance was 100% for initial hospital inpatient screening and for outpatient rescreening but decreased throughout the referral process. All of the parents of babies with hearing loss complied, and their infants were diagnosed by age 3 months and received audiologic or otologic intervention by age 6 months. Only half of those who needed and opted for hearing aids complied and began habilitative intervention by age 6 months.

Conclusions

Although compliance for initial and follow-up screening was excellent and met goals for national benchmarks, compliance for intervention services showed room for improvement.

Relation between predischarge auditory brainstem responses and clinical factors in high-risk infants

BACKGROUND

Advances in perinatal medicine have increased the survival rate of infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Some of the infants will have health problems including hearing disorder and/or brainstem dysfunction, and may have associated communicative and cognitive difficulties and/or repeated apnea attacks that require therapy or care.

METHODS

In this study, the authors measured mean thresholds and mean I-V interpeak latencies in 56 high-risk infants and 30 controls who were about to be discharged from NICU. The authors retrospectively investigated whether predischarge auditory brainstem response (ABR) data, which seem to be related to a number of clinical factors affecting neonates, are useful for detecting hearing disorder and/or brainstem dysfunction, and we investigated six clinical factors.

RESULTS

The results showed that the positive risk factors for hearing impairment in infants who are about to be discharged from the NICU are: receiving mechanical ventilation (including for a period of <1 day) and the administration of five or more different antibiotics, especially in extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) infants. Another result showed that the high-risk mature infants had a significant high risk factor for brainstem dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the study emphasize the importance of performing ABR examinations in high-risk infants, even in infants who are about to be discharged from an NICU. ABR examinations are especially important in ELBW infants or mature infants who have received mechanical ventilation or who have received five or more different antibiotics.

Electrophysiological and behavioral methods in early detection of hearing impairment

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in neonatal life-support systems have contributed to the survival of high-risk newborns. However, protection of the auditory system and the prevention of sequelae is still paramount in neonatal neurology. The aim of this study was to compare auditory-evoked responses with a toy test and acoustic reflex in the early detection of hearing loss in infants.

METHODS

Three groups were studied. The first was composed of infants showing less than a 30 dB biaural threshold in the neurophysiological test. The second group was made up of infants showing peripheral alterations on one side or both ears. The third group was comprised of infants who showed no responses at 95 dB HL in both ears after neurophysiological testing. The neurophysiological test, toy test, and acoustic reflex were performed on the same day, with masked results given to each investigator. Sensitivity and specificity for each toy test and acoustic reflex were calculated afterward.

RESULTS

Forty-five controls, 44 peripheral alterations, and 8 non-response infants were studied. Most patients studied were born prior to the 37(th) week of gestation with a birthweight of less than 2,250 g, received required administration of potential ototoxic drugs and mechanical ventilation, and showed hyperbilirubinemia and hypoxia. Sensitivity for each toy was as follows: drum 0.54; wooden rattle 1.0, and metallic ratle 0.88. Specificity was 0.95, 1.0, and 1.0, respectively. Acoustic reflex sensitivity was 0.38 and specificity was 0.97.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that the wooden and the metallic rattles of the toy test can be useful tools in the study of hearing in the high-risk infant and deserve more attention in future studies.