Determination and application of the reference isodose length (RIL) for commercial endovascular brachytherapy devices

A review of brachytherapy physical phantoms developed over the last 20 years: clinical purpose and future requirements

Within the brachytherapy community, many phantoms are constructed in-house, and less commercial development is observed as compared to the field of external beam. Computational or virtual phantom design has seen considerable growth; however, physical phantoms are beneficial for brachytherapy, in which quality is dependent on physical processes, such as accuracy of source placement. Focusing on the design of physical phantoms, this review paper presents a summary of brachytherapy specific phantoms in published journal articles over the last twenty years (January 1, 2000 - December 31, 2019). The papers were analyzed and tabulated by their primary clinical purpose, which was deduced from their associated publications. A substantial body of work has been published on phantom designs from the brachytherapy community, but a standardized method of reporting technical aspects of the phantoms is lacking. In-house phantom development demonstrates an increasing interest in magnetic resonance (MR) tissue mimicking materials, which is not yet reflected in commercial phantoms available for brachytherapy. The evaluation of phantom design provides insight into the way, in which brachytherapy practice has changed over time, and demonstrates the customised and broad nature of treatments offered.

Beta endovascular brachytherapy using CO2-filled centering catheter for treatment of recurrent superficial femoropopliteal artery disease

BACKGROUND

Recurrent disease (restenosis) after endovascular treatment of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) remains a major problem. We evaluated the efficacy of beta-endovascular brachytherapy using the CORONA centering catheter in patients with SFA restenosis in a single-arm Phase II trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (mean age 70 years; 16 female, 12 male) with recurrent SFA stenosis were treated, and in-stent restenosis was present in 17 patients (61%). Brachytherapy was performed with strontium-90 beta source using a 7-French CO(2)-filled one-segment centering catheter. New stents had to be applied in two cases. Mean interventional length was 129 mm (range 20-240 mm). A dose of 14 Gy in vessel radius (postinterventional) plus 2 mm was applied in 24 patients and 18.4 Gy in four patients. Treatment time was 7 min 32 s per radiation segment. No major adverse events occurred. Patients were followed by ankle-brachial index and duplex sonography for a median of 42 months. Cumulative restenosis rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 9%, 28%, and 40%, respectively. Target vessel revascularization was performed in seven cases (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to literature data, the treatment of SFA restenosis with beta brachytherapy may improve long-term patency.

Uncertainties in assessment of the vaginal dose for intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer using a tandem-ring applicator

PURPOSE

The vagina has not been widely recognized as organ at risk in brachytherapy for cervical cancer. No widely accepted dose parameters are available. This study analyzes the uncertainties in dose reporting for the vaginal wall using tandem-ring applicators.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Organ wall contours were delineated on axial magnetic resonance (MR) slices to perform dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis. Different DVH parameters were used in a feasibility study based on 40 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment plans of different cervical cancer patients. Dose to the most irradiated, 0.1 cm(3), 1 cm(3), 2 cm(3), and at defined points on the ring surface and at 5-mm tissue depth were reported. Treatment-planning systems allow different methods of dose point definition. Film dosimetry was used to verify the maximum dose at the surface of the ring applicator in an experimental setup.

RESULTS

Dose reporting for the vagina is extremely sensitive to geometrical uncertainties with variations of 25% for 1 mm shifts. Accurate delineation of the vaginal wall is limited by the finite pixel size of MRI and available treatment-planning systems. No significant correlation was found between dose-point and dose-volume parameters. The DVH parameters were often related to noncontiguous volumes and were not able to detect very different situations of spatial dose distributions inside the vaginal wall. Deviations between measured and calculated doses were up to 21%.

CONCLUSIONS

Reporting either point dose values or DVH parameters for the vaginal wall is based on high inaccuracies because of contouring and geometric positioning. Therefore, the use of prospective dose constraints for individual treatment plans is not to be recommended at present. However, for large patient groups treated within one protocol correlation with vaginal morbidity can be evaluated.

Randomized comparison between intracoronary β-radiation brachytherapy and implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intracoronary brachytherapy was the primary therapeutic option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) during the last years. Especially for the treatment of diffuse ISR (lesions >10mm), beta-source brachytherapy was significantly superior to singular balloon angioplasty. Despite lacking clinical database, the implantation of drug eluting stents recently became a common procedure for the treatment of ISR. This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy of beta-brachytherapy with beta-radioisotopes (90)Sr/(90)Y and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of diffuse ISR.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to beta-brachytherapy after balloon angioplasty (Beta-Cath in 17 patients) or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (Taxus-Express2 in 20 patients). Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained for all patients, while angiographic follow-up was available for 30 patients.

RESULTS

Binary ISR (restenosis >50%) within target segment was observed in three patients treated with Beta-Cath, of which one needed target segment revascularisation for recurrent ISR, whereas no significant restenosis occurred in the patients treated with Taxus-Express2 (P=0.037). No further major adverse cardiac (target segment revascularisation, myocardial infarction, death) was found in either group (P=NS). Stent implantation was the more time-saving (31+/-11 min versus 60+/-23 min, P<0.001) procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this trial revealed a significant reduction of binary restenosis in the Taxus-Express2 arm, we found no difference in clinical outcome after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse ISR when compared to beta-brachytherapy.

Determinants of model of renarrowing after beta radiation for in-stent restenosis

It is unknown whether model of renarrowing after beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is influenced by the type of geographic miss (GM).

METHODS

In 166 ISR treated with Galileo, serial quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was done. Minimal lumen diameters and lengths were measured for (1) stent, (2) peri-stent subsegments subjected to angioplasty with/without irradiation, and (3) irradiation margins. GM was defined as: (Type 1) edge injury within the 32P source dose fall-off: 2.0 mm inside and outside the source end marker or (Type 2) overt, nonirradiated injury: beyond the outer 2.0-mm long dose fall-off zone.

RESULTS

Restenosis rate was 28.3% at 8.9+/-4.5 months with 60% located exclusively outside the stent. Type 1 GM was present in 24.7% of proximal edges, whereas Type 2 in 18.1%. Respective percentages for distal edges were 23.5% and 15.7%. Regardless of presence and type of GM, significant late lumen loss occurred only outside the stent. However, the biggest late lumen loss at the proximal edge was induced by the Type 1 GM (0.65+/-0.79, p<0.001), while proximal Type 2 GM was not associated with edge renarrowing (-0.04+/-0.48, p=NS). Both reference lumen diameter and proximal Type 1 GM influenced restenosis independently (OR 0.47; 95%CI 0.24-0.90; p=0.023 and OR 2.46; 95%CI 1.12-5.40; p=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of presence and type of geographic miss, late lumen loss after beta-radiation occurs only outside the stent. However, injury within the proximal 32P dose fall-off but not overt edge injury is associated with the biggest late lumen loss at the respective edge, triggering recurrent restenosis.

Randomized blinded clinical trial of intracoronary brachytherapy with 90Sr/Y beta-radiation for the prevention of restenosis after stent implantation in native coronary arteries in diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

We report a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of intracoronary beta-radiation for prevention of restenosis after stent implantation in native coronary de novo lesions in diabetic patients.

METHODS

After successful stent implantation in native coronary de novo lesions, 106 lesions in 89 diabetic patients were randomly allocated to treatment with beta-radiation with 18 Gy at 1 mm vessel depth (n = 53) or placebo treatment (n = 53).

RESULTS

Angiographic analysis at 9 month follow-up revealed a late lumen loss of 0.7+/-0.9 mm in the radiotherapy group versus 1.2+/-0.8 mm in the control group at the injured segment (P = 0.006), 0.9+/-1.0 versus 1.3+/-0.7 mm at the radiated segment (P = 0.02), and 0.9+/-1.0 versus 1.3+/-0.7 mm at the target segment (P = 0.04) (defined as active source length plus 5mm on proximal and distal sites). Binary restenosis rates were significantly lower in the radiation group in all subsegments (injured segment: 10.9 versus 37.3%, P = 0.003; radiated segment: 21.7 versus 49.0%, P = 0.005; target segment: 23.9 versus 49.0%, P = 0.01). Target lesion revascularization for restenosis was required in nine lesions (17.6%) in the radiotherapy group versus 18 (34.0%) in the placebo group (P = 0.05). Late thrombosis occurred in four radiated patients (after premature discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy in all), resulting in a major adverse clinical event rate of 37.2% in the brachytherapy group versus 38.6% in the placebo group (P = ns).

CONCLUSIONS

In diabetic patients with de novo coronary lesions, intracoronary radiation after stent implantation significantly reduced restenosis. However, this clinical benefit was reduced by the frequent occurrence of late thrombosis.

Quantification of dose perturbation by plaque in vascular brachytherapy

BACKGROUND

Dose prescription and reporting in vascular brachytherapy (VBT) is based on the assumption that the vessel wall is water equivalent, which does not consider a possible dose perturbation by plaque. As the extent of this perturbation is unknown, we aimed to quantify dose attenuation by atherosclerotic plaque for beta- and gamma-radiation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The dose delivered from Strontium-90/Yttrium-90 ((90)Sr/Y) and Iridium-192 ((192)Ir) sources with and without human peripheral arteries ((90)Sr/Y: n = 38, (192)Ir: n = 7) surrounding the respective delivery catheter was determined with radiochromic films. Plaque and vessel wall thickness were measured using light microscopy. From the ratio-attenuated doseunattenuated dose (dose perturbation factor: DPF) we determined averaged attenuation coefficients for atherosclerotic plaque (micro(P)) and the residual part of the vessel wall (micro(W)) by regression analysis based on the function DPF = exp(-micro(P) * plaque thickness -micro(W) * residual wall thickness).

RESULTS

Attenuation in case of (192)Ir was less than the measurement uncertainties. For beta-radiation correlation was found by discrimination between calcified and noncalcified plaque. Classifying noncalcified plaque as normal arterial tissue, the regression coefficient was r = 0.845 at micro(P)= 0.5356 mm(-1) and micro(W) = 0.0663 mm(-1).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular brachytherapy with beta radiation in calcified arteries results in significant dose attenuation within the vessel wall, which can be calculated on knowing the vascular morphometry. Thus, plaque thickness should be taken into account in treatment planning and retrospective analyses.

Treatment parameters for beta and gamma devices in peripheral endovascular brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To determine dosimetric parameters, such as radial and longitudinal dose profiles, for beta and gamma devices in peripheral endovascular brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An (192)Ir high-dose rate stepping source, a (90)Sr source train, and a (32)P-coated radiation balloon were investigated. The treatment-planning software PLATO, Monte Carlo code EGSnrc, and GafChromic film dosimetry were used to analyze the dose distribution of these devices.

RESULTS

For a 5-mm-diameter vessel, the ratio between the dose at 2 mm depth and the dose at the lumen surface was 1.8, 3.4, and 16.2 for the (192)Ir, (90)Sr, and (32)P devices, respectively. The dose variation at the reference depth of 2 mm into the vessel wall was 7-18 Gy, for different analyzed dose prescriptions. The reference lumen dose was different by a factor >8. For all three devices, the reference isodose length was not <5 mm on the proximal and distal edge of the active source length.

CONCLUSIONS

A complete set of dose parameters for beta and gamma sources has to be considered for appropriate treatment planning and performance, including reporting of reference depth dose, reference lumen dose, and reference isodose length.

Basic treatment planning parameters for a 90Sr / 90Y source train used in endovascular brachytherapy

Working groups of the AAPM, DGMP, and ESTRO have published recommendations for endovascular brachytherapy, introducing concepts of relevant parameters for dose specification and treatment planning. However, the procedures for this treatment remain often mainly based on trial protocols and manufacturer instructions. Treatment planning requires the essential knowledge of the radial and longitudinal dose distribution, as well as information about geometrical uncertainties. The present study includes a whole data set for daily clinical practice using a commercially available device for endovascular brachytherapy (Novoste Betacath). The dose distribution around the 90Sr seed train was calculated with Monte-Carlo algorithms and verified by film dosimetry. The radial dose profile was determined starting from the surface of the delivery catheter Calculated dose profiles were in good agreement to measured values. The geometrical uncertainties were estimated with a retrospective analysis of 51 patient treatments. This shows the importance of using a safety margin of at least 10 mm between Intervention Length and Reference Isodose Length. Based on the longitudinal dose profile and the necessary safety margins, the maximum treatable intervention length is 25 mm and 45 mm for a 40 mm and 60 mm source train, respectively.

Clinical quality assurance for endovascular brachytherapy devices

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Endovascular brachytherapy is still an important therapy modality with a high number of treated patients per year. Quality assurance of devices used has been addressed already in several publications (AAPM, DGMP, ESTRO, NCS). However, there are no clear recommendations given on test procedures and related equipment. Our experience with four different devices containing beta- ((32)P, (90)Sr/Y) and gamma-sources ((192)Ir), which were used in clinical routine during the last 3 years is described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The incoming check includes leakage radiation, missing catheter interlock, positioning test, timer check, interrupt button check, power-off test and verification of the manual retraction facility. Dose profiles are measured using GafChromic film. Source strength verification is performed using well type chambers or air-kerma measurements. In addition, the proposed reference absorbed dose rate at 2 mm distance from the source centre is measured with a dedicated film dosimetry technique where two additional films are exposed to two known doses in a (60)Co field for calibration.

RESULTS

Dosimetrical parameters (dose profiles, source strength) are found to be within +/-10% of the manufacturers specifications. The reference dose rate measured with film is on average +3.1% for 13 (90)Sr seed trains, +8.1% for three (32)P wire sources and -3.7% for one (192)Ir seed ribbon compared to the source certificate. The activity of 30 individual (32)P wire sources measured by using a calibrated well type chamber showed a deviation of mean -0.3%, the activity of 16 (192)Ir seed ribbons determined with air kerma measurements a deviation of mean 2.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The QA programme introduced in our department provides methods to verify all relevant parameters proposed by international recommendations. Film dosimetry can be used as independent verification of the reference dose rate within a 10% limit.

Quality assurance in intracoronary brachytherapy. Recommendations for determining the planning target length to avoid geographic miss

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A new method of assessing geographic miss (GM) in endovascular brachytherapy (EVBT) is applied to evaluate the quality of intracoronary brachytherapy treatments, retrospectively. Based on the Vienna experience, recommendations for adequate safety margins are derived to avoid GM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Evaluation is done on 136 vessels of 128 consecutive patients treated between October 1999 and July 2001. The quality of EVBT is assessed using the concept and terminology of the EVA GEC ESTRO task group. Evaluation of GM and/or safety margin is performed by comparing the outermost interventions with the reference isodose length (RIL) of the applied delivering devices on recorded compact disk (CD) angiograms. The RIL is defined as the length of the vessel segment, which receives at least 90% of the reference dose at the reference depth (=1 mm within the vessel). GM is defined as injured vessel segments, which receive a dose lower than 90% of reference dose. Measurements of intervention length (IL) and active source length (ASL) are performed with respect to anatomical landmarks within the vessel in the region of interest (e.g. stent edges), and by using the nominal length of the devices (balloons, sources) as a reference scale. The edges of RIL are determined by subtracting the length of the dose-fall-off zone (specific to the applied delivery devices: (192)Ir 4.5 mm, (90)Sr 2.5 mm, (32)P 2.0 mm) from the edges of ASL.

RESULTS

The described method to assess GM is applicable to 128 vessels (94%). GM is found in 23% of proximal edges and 20% of distal edges. 95% of all GM are observed if the total margin (proximal+distal margin) between RIL and IL is shorter than 10.5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

GM in intracoronary brachytherapy can be widely avoided by adding an appropriate safety margin to the IL (5-6 mm each edge in this study) in order to determine the necessary RIL for a treatment.

Geographical miss during intracoronary irradiation: impact on restenosis and determination of required safety margin length

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the incidence and effects of underdosage of injured segments during intracoronary irradiation and to define the minimal length of safety margin required to avoid mismatched source placement.

BACKGROUND

Underdosage of injured segments due to misplacement of active source has been suggested as the underlying mechanism for the occurrence of edge restenosis.

METHODS

Baseline angiograms of 112 vessels in 109 patients with in-stent restenosis undergoing coronary reintervention followed by intracoronary irradiation ((192)Ir: Checkmate, Cordis, Miami, Florida; (32)P: Gallileo, Guidant, Houston, Texas; (90)Sr/Y: Beta-Cath, Novoste, Norcross, Georgia) were analyzed. The distances between the outermost injury and outermost end of "reference isodose length" (RIL), defined as a segment with >/=90% of reference dose at 1 mm vessel wall depth, were measured. "Safety margin" was defined as the distance between the outermost injury and outermost end of the RIL, "geographical miss" (GM) as a complete injured segment not being covered by the RIL, and "restenosis" as the percent diameter stenosis >50%.

RESULTS

Baseline angiographic analysis was performed for 224 edges in 112 vessels. Geographical miss was found in 46 (20.6%) edges. The incidence of target lesion restenosis within the 78 vessels with available follow-up was 43.3% for patients with GM versus 14.9% for patients with no GM (p = 0.005). Analysis of various injured segments exposed highest restenosis rates in injured segments with negligible irradiation (27.8%) in comparison with injured segments with dose fall-off (16.7%) or injured segments with full-dose irradiation (7.7%) (p = 0.006). Receiver operating curve analysis revealed a safety margin of 10 mm required per vessel (i.e., 5-mm safety margin/edge) to achieve 95% specificity of GM.

CONCLUSIONS

Geographical miss is associated with a higher incidence of restenosis at the corresponding edges. Restenosis was more pronounced in injured segments with negligible irradiation than in injured segments at the dose fall-off zones. We recommend a safety margin of 10 mm per vessel to minimize GM.