1
|
Yang F, Wong RJ, Zakeri K, Singh A, Estilo CL, Lee NY. Osteoradionecrosis Rates After Head and Neck Radiation Therapy: Beyond the Numbers. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e264-e275. [PMID: 38649030 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a severe late complication of head and neck radiation therapy shown to have profound negative effect on the quality of life of cancer survivors. Over the past few decades, improvements in radiation delivery techniques have resulted in a decrease in the incidence of ORN. However, even with modern radiation therapy techniques, ORN remains an important clinical concern. In recent literature, there is a wide range of reported ORN rates from 0% to as high as 20%. With such a high level of variability in the reported incidence of ORN, oncologists often encounter difficulties estimating the risk of this serious radiation therapy toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS In this review, the authors present a summary of the factors that contribute to the high level of variability in the reported incidence of ORN. RESULTS Variable definition, variable grading, and heterogeneity of both study inclusion criteria and treatment parameters can each significantly influence the reporting of ORN rates. CONCLUSIONS Given numerous factors can affect the reported incidence of ORN, a thorough understanding of the clinical context behind the reported ORN rates is needed to comprehend the true risk of this important radiation therapy toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Yang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Richard J Wong
- Departments of Head and Neck Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Annu Singh
- Departments of Dentistry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cherry L Estilo
- Departments of Dentistry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lønbro S, Gam S, Hermann AP, Hansen CR, Johansen J. Accelerated loss of lean body mass in head and neck cancer patients during cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1403-1411. [PMID: 37589161 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2245558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated changes in body weight, lean body mass (LBM), fat mass (FM), muscle strength and functional performance during radiation treatment in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) patients. Secondly, it investigated the impact of cisplatin-based chemoradiation (CCRT) on LBM loss compared with radiation alone. METHODS 48 patients (all tumor sites) received either 6 weeks of radiation alone (n = 16) with 66-68 Gy in 33-34 Fx, 5-6 Fx/week or CCRT, adding weekly cisplatin or carboplatin (n = 32). LBM and FM was evaluated using Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry bi-weekly from pre- to two weeks post-treatment. Maximal muscle strength (knee extension, leg - and chest press) and functional performance (stair climb, chair rise, and arm curl) were assessed pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS Body weight and LBM had declined significantly already week 2 into treatment and declined significantly further through week 4 and 6 before leveling off after week 6. Bi-weekly, from treatment start to week 2, 2-4, and 4-6, LBM declined 1.2 ± 0.4 kg (p = .002; 95% CI: 0.4;2.0), 2.0 ± 0.4 kg (p < .0001; 1.2;2.8) and 1.4 ± 0.4 kg (p = .001; 0.6;2.2). With a two-week delay, FM declined significantly from week 2-8. All measures of muscle strength declined significantly from pre- to post-treatment. Functional performance was unchanged. LBM loss from pre- to post-treatment was significantly associated with impaired muscle strength (R2 = 0.3-0.5). CCRT patients lost 3.1 ± 0.8 kg of LBM (p = .0001; 1.5;4.7) more from pre- to post-treatment compared with patients receiving radiation alone. Analyses adjusting for nimorazole, tumor stage, baseline BMI, mean radiation dose to constrictor muscles and oral cavity confirmed this. CONCLUSION Accelerated and substantial LBM loss was already initiated within the first two weeks of treatment - before the onset of radiation-induced mucositis. LBM loss was associated with muscle strength impairment. Patients receiving CCRT experienced significantly larger LBM loss than patients receiving radiation alone. Registered on clinincaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05890859).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Lønbro
- Department of Public Health, Section for Sport Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Søren Gam
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Anne Pernille Hermann
- Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christian Rønn Hansen
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jørgen Johansen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adrian G, Gebre-Medhin M, Nilsson P. Importance of tumor volume, overall treatment time and fractionation sensitivity for p16-positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal tumors. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1375-1383. [PMID: 37682690 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2251084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analyses of clinical outcomes following radiotherapy (RT) have advanced our understanding of fundamental radiobiological characteristics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Low fractionation sensitivity appears to be a common feature, as well as susceptibility to changes in overall treatment time (OTT). Large tumors should be harder to cure if a successful RT requires the sterilization of all clonogenic cells. Congruently, primary tumor volume has proven to be an important parameter. However, most findings come from an era when p16-negative HNSCC was the dominant tumor type. HPV-associated, p16-positive, oropharyngeal tumors (OPSCC) are more radiosensitive and have better outcome. The current study aims to investigate the role of primary tumor volume, OTT and estimate α/ β -ratio for p16-positive OPSCC, and to quantify the differences in radiosensitivity depending on p16-status. METHODS A cohort of 523 patients treated with RT was studied using a tumor control probability (TCP)-model that incorporates primary tumor volume (V) raised to an exponent c, OTT and α/ β -estimation. The significance of V was also investigated in Cox-regression models. RESULTS In the p16-positive cohort (n = 433), the volume exponent c was 1.44 (95%CI 1.06-1.91), compared to 0.90 (0.54-1.32) for p16-negative tumors (n = 90). Hazard ratios per tumor volume doubling were 2.37 (1.72-3.28) and 1.83 (1.28-2.62) for p16-positive and p16-negative, respectively. The estimated α/ β -ratio was 9.7 Gy (-2.3-21.6), and a non-significant daily loss of 0.30 Gy (-0.17-0.92) was found. An additional dose of 6.8 Gy (interquartile range 4.8-9.1) may theoretically counteract the more radioresistant behavior of p16-negative tumors. CONCLUSION Primary tumor volume plays a crucial role in predicting local tumor response, particularly in p16-positive OPSCC. The estimated α/β-ratio for p16-positive oropharyngeal tumors aligns with previous HNSCC studies, whereas the impact of prolonged OTT was slightly less than previously reported. The differences in radiosensitivity depending on p16-status were quantified. The findings should be validated in independent cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Gebre-Medhin
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Koukourakis IM, Giakzidis AG, Koukourakis MI. Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy with dose-adjusted ultra-hypofractionated re-irradiation in patients with locoregionally recurrent head and neck cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3032-3041. [PMID: 37059932 PMCID: PMC10462536 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03172-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with recurrent inoperable squamous-cell head-neck cancer (HNSCC) after chemo-radiotherapy have an ominous prognosis. Re-irradiation can be applied with some efficacy and high toxicity rates. Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy is effective in 25% of patients. Immunogenic death produced by large radiotherapy (RT) fractions may enhance immune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of ultra-hypofractionated immuno-radiotherapy (uhypo-IRT) in 17 patients with recurrent HNSCC and 1 with melanoma. Four of HNSCC patients also had oligometastatic disease. Using a dose/time/toxicity-based algorithm, 7, 7 and 4 patients received 1, 2 and 3 fractions of 8 Gy to the tumor, respectively. Nivolumab anti-PD-1 immunotherapy was administered concurrently with RT and continued for 24 cycles, or until disease progression or manifestation of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS Early and late RT toxicities were minimal. Three patients developed irAEs (16%). After the 12th cycle, 7/17 (41.2%) and 5/17 (29.4%) patients with HNSCC showed complete (CR) and partial response (PR), respectively. CR was also achieved in the melanoma patient. The objective response rates in HNSCC patients were 57%, 86% and 66%, after 1, 2 and 3 fractions, respectively (overall response rate 70.6%). Most responders experienced an increase in peripheral lymphocyte counts. The median time to progression was 10 months. The 3-year projected locoregional progression-free survival was 35%, while the 3-year disease-specific overall survival was 50%. CONCLUSIONS Anti-PD1 uhypo-IRT is safe and effective in patients with recurrent HNSCC. The high objective response rates and the long survival without evidence of disease support further trials on uhypo-IRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis M Koukourakis
- Radiation Oncology Unit, 1st, Department of Radiology, Medical School, "Aretaieion" University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUOA), Athens, Greece
- Department of Radiotherapy - Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Axiotis G Giakzidis
- Department of Radiotherapy - Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - Michael I Koukourakis
- Department of Radiotherapy - Oncology, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li CX, Sun JL, Gong ZC, Liu H, Ding MC, Zhao HR. An umbrella review exploring the effect of radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients on the frequency of jaws osteoradionecrosis. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:434-446. [PMID: 37268457 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Efforts have been made to reduce epidemiological indicators of osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancer over recent years. This umbrella review aims to synthesize the information of the systematic reviews/meta-analyses investigating the effect of radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer on the frequency of osteoradionecrosis and to identify and analyze the gaps in current scientific literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic review of systematic reviews with and without meta-analysis of intervention studies was conducted. Qualitative analysis of the reviews and their quality evaluation were performed. RESULTS A total of 152 articles were obtained, and ten of them were selected for the final analysis, where six were systematic reviews and four were meta-analysis. According to the guide Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (Amstar), eight articles included were of high quality and two of medium quality. These descriptive systematic reviews/meta-analyses included a total of 25 randomized clinical trials, showing that radiotherapy has positive effects on the frequency of osteoradionecrosis. Even though a reduction in the incidence of osteoradionecrosis was observed back in the history, in systematic reviews with meta-analysis, overall effect estimators were not significant. CONCLUSIONS Differential findings are not enough to demonstrate that there is a significant reduction in the frequency of osteoradionecrosis in patients with head and neck cancer treated by radiation. Possible explanations are related to factors such as the type of studies analyzed, indicator of irradiated complication considered, and specific variables included in the analysis. Many systematic reviews did not address publication bias and did identify gaps in knowledge that require further clarification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C X Li
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology & Surgery, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi 830054, China; School/Hospital of Stomatology, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China; Stomatological Research Institute of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830054, China.
| | - J-L Sun
- Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
| | - Z-C Gong
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology & Surgery, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated First Hospital, Urumqi 830054, China; School/Hospital of Stomatology, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China; Stomatological Research Institute of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830054, China.
| | - H Liu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital & School of Stomatology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200003, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Craniomaxillofacial Development and Diseases, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - M-C Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China
| | - H-R Zhao
- The First Ward of Oncological Department, Cancer Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Comparison of focal cryoballoon ablation with 10- and 8-second doses for treatment of Barrett's esophagus-related neoplasia: results from a prospective European multicenter study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:743-751.e4. [PMID: 35724692 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Focal cryoballoon ablation (FCBA) is currently being investigated for the treatment of Barrett's esophagus (BE)-related neoplasia in a European multicenter study (Euro-Coldplay study). After inclusion of 28 of 107 patients, the initial dose of 10 seconds was lowered to 8 seconds. The current study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a single FCBA treatment session with 10 seconds versus 8 seconds. METHODS Treatments were performed at 7 European BE referral centers. All 28 patients treated with 10 seconds were compared with 28 consecutive patients treated with 8 seconds. The gastroesophageal junction was ablated circumferentially followed by all visible BE. To assess efficacy and safety, 3 expert adjudicators, blinded to physician and dose, compared pre- and post-treatment images. Primary outcomes were median BE surface regression and stricture rate after single-session FCBA. RESULTS We included 56 patients (10-second cohort, n = 28; 8-second cohort, n = 28) with a median BE length of C0M2 (Prague classification). Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the cohorts. The median BE surface regression after a single FCBA session was comparable for 10 seconds and 8 seconds (80% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 75-90] and 80% [95% CI, 66-90], respectively; P = .65). Strictures requiring dilation were seen in 19% (95% CI, 4-33) and 15% (95% CI, 4-30) of the 10-second and 8-second groups, respectively (P = 1.00). Two patients in the 10-second group developed a severe stricture requiring >3 dilations. CONCLUSIONS In patients with limited BE, single-session FCBA with 8 seconds showed similar BE surface regression as compared with 10 seconds and may theoretically result in fewer and less severe strictures. Therefore, we suggest using 8 seconds as the standard dose for FCBA. (Clinical trial registration number: NL7253.).
Collapse
|
7
|
Escalating a Biological Dose of Radiation in the Target Volume Applying Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Head and Neck Region Tumours. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10071484. [PMID: 35884789 PMCID: PMC9313164 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The treatment of head and neck tumours is a complicated process usually involving surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatment. Despite the multidisciplinary approach, treatment outcomes are still unsatisfactory, especially considering malignant tumours such as squamous cell carcinoma or sarcoma, where the frequency of recurrence has reached 50% of cases. The implementation of modern and precise methods of radiotherapy, such as a radiosurgery boost, may allow for the escalation of the biologically effective dose in the gross tumour volume and improve the results of treatment. Methods: The administration of a stereotactic radiotherapy boost can be done in two ways: an upfront boost followed by conventional radio(chemo)therapy or a direct boost after conventional radio(chemo)therapy. The boost dose depends on the primary or nodal tumour volume and localization regarding the organs at risk. It falls within the range of 10–18 Gy. Discussion: The collection of detailed data on the response of the disease to the radiosurgery boost combined with conventional radiotherapy as well as an assessment of early and late toxicities will contribute crucial information to the prospective modification of fractionated radiotherapy. In the case of beneficial findings, the stereotactic radiosurgery boost in the course of radio(chemo)therapy in patients with head and neck tumours will be able to replace traditional techniques of radiation, and radical schemes of treatment will be possible for future development.
Collapse
|
8
|
Adrian G, Carlsson H, Kjellén E, Sjövall J, Zackrisson B, Nilsson P, Gebre-Medhin M. Primary tumor volume and prognosis for patients with p16-positive and p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:107. [PMID: 35701827 PMCID: PMC9195357 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02074-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prescribed radiation dose to patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is standardized, even if the prognosis for individual patients may differ. Easy-at-hand pre-treatment risk stratification methods are valuable to individualize therapy. In the current study we assessed the prognostic impact of primary tumor volume for p16-positive and p16-negative tumors and in relationship to other prognostic factors for outcome in patients with OPSCC treated with primary radiation therapy (RT). METHODS Five hundred twenty-three OPSCC patients with p16-status treated with primary RT (68.0 Gy to 73.1 Gy in 7 weeks, or 68.0 Gy in 4.5 weeks), with or without concurrent chemotherapy, within three prospective trials were included in the study. Local failure (LF), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in relationship to the size of the primary gross tumor volume (GTV-T) and other prognostic factors were investigated. Efficiency of intensified RT (RT with total dose 73.1 Gy or given within 4.5 weeks) was analyzed in relationship to tumor volume. RESULTS The volume of GTV-T and p16-status were found to be the strongest prognostic markers for LF, PFS and OS. For p16-positive tumors, an increase in tumor volume had a significantly higher negative prognostic impact compared with p16-negative tumors. Within a T-classification, patients with a smaller tumor, compared with a larger tumor, had a better prognosis. The importance of tumor volume remained after adjusting for nodal status, age, performance status, smoking status, sex, and hemoglobin-level. The adjusted hazard ratio for OS per cm3 increase in tumor volume was 2.3% (95% CI 0-4.9) for p16-positive and 1.3% (95% 0.3-2.2) for p16-negative. Exploratory analyses suggested that intensified RT could mitigate the negative impact of a large tumor volume. CONCLUSIONS Outcome for patients with OPSCC treated with RT is largely determined by tumor volume, even when adjusting for other established prognostic factors. Tumor volume is significantly more influential for patients with p16-positive tumors. Patients with large tumor volumes might benefit by intensified RT to improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Henrik Carlsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johanna Sjövall
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology –Head and Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Gebre-Medhin
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brand DH, Kirby AM, Yarnold JR, Somaiah N. How Low Can You Go? The Radiobiology of Hypofractionation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:280-287. [PMID: 35260319 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Hypofractionated radical radiotherapy is now an accepted standard of care for tumour sites such as prostate and breast cancer. Much research effort is being directed towards more profoundly hypofractionated (ultrahypofractionated) schedules, with some reaching UK standard of care (e.g. adjuvant breast). Hypofractionation exerts varying influences on each of the major clinical end points of radiotherapy studies: acute toxicity, late toxicity and local control. This review will discuss these effects from the viewpoint of the traditional 5 Rs of radiobiology, before considering non-canonical radiobiological effects that may be relevant to ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy. The principles outlined here may assist the reader in their interpretation of the wealth of clinical data presented in the tumour site-specific articles in this special issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D H Brand
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A M Kirby
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J R Yarnold
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Somaiah
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Barbon CEA, Chepeha DB, Hope AJ, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Waito AA, Steele CM. Determining the Impact of Thickened Liquids on Swallowing in Patients Undergoing Irradiation for Oropharynx Cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:511-514. [PMID: 33940982 PMCID: PMC8892064 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211010435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The current standard for the treatment of oropharynx cancers is radiation therapy. However, patients are frequently left with dysphagia characterized by penetration-aspiration (impaired safety) and residue (impaired efficiency). Although thickened liquids are commonly used to manage dysphagia, we lack evidence to guide the modification of liquids for clinical benefit in the head and neck cancer population. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of slightly and mildly thick liquids on penetration-aspiration and residue in 12 patients with oropharyngeal cancer who displayed penetration-aspiration on thin liquid within 3 to 6 months after completion of radiotherapy. Significantly fewer instances of penetration-aspiration were seen with slightly and mildly thick liquids as compared with thin (P < .05). No differences were found across stimuli in the frequency of residue. Patients with oropharyngeal cancers who present with post-radiation therapy dysphagia involving penetration-aspiration on thin liquids may benefit from slightly and mildly thick liquids without risk of worse residue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly E A Barbon
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto, Canada
| | - Douglas B Chepeha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew J Hope
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Melanie Peladeau-Pigeon
- Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ashley A Waito
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto, Canada
| | - Catriona M Steele
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, Swallowing Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Huynh M, Kempson I, Bezak E, Phillips W. Predictive modeling of hypoxic head and neck cancers during fractionated radiotherapy with gold nanoparticle radiosensitization. Med Phys 2021; 48:3120-3133. [PMID: 33818799 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intrinsic radioresistance and increased proliferation rates in head and neck cancers (HNCs) are associated with negative radiotherapy (RT) treatment responses. The use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as radiosensitizers could enable total radiation dose reduction and lowered radiation toxicity. AuNP radiosensitization may overcome hypoxia-induced radioresistance and treatment-induced accelerated repopulation of cancer cells in HNCs, improving radiotherapy outcomes. METHODS Tumor control was determined by considering individual cancer cell responses in probabilistic computational simulations using HYP-RT software for clinical radiotherapy doses and fractionation schedules along with three different nanoparticle administration schedules. Antagonistic tumor hypoxia and rapid tumor regrowth due to accelerated repopulation of cancers cells were taken into consideration. RESULTS Simulations indicate that tumors that are conventionally uncontrollable can be controlled with AuNP radiosensitization. In simulations where the absence of AuNPs required radiotherapy doses above standard clinical prescriptions, reoccurring AuNP administration allowed for radiation dose reductions below standard clinical dose prescriptions. For example, considering a 2 Gy per fraction radiotherapy schedule, tumor control was achieved with 57.2 ± 5.1 Gy (P = <0.0001) for weekly AuNP administration and 53.0 ± 4.0 Gy (P = <0.0001) for biweekly AuNP administration compared to 69.9 ± 5.8 Gy with no radiosensitization. CONCLUSIONS AuNPs decreased the predicted RT total doses required to achieve tumor control via total stem cell elimination, offering an optimistic prediction and method for which hypoxia-induced and rapidly growing radioresistant tumors are treated more effectively. Outcomes are also shown to be sensitive to the RT schedule with data for hyperfractionated RT indicating the greatest benefits from radiosensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myxuan Huynh
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ivan Kempson
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA, 5095, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Wendy Phillips
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Department of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huynh M, Kempson I, Bezak E, Phillips W. In silico modeling of cellular probabilistic nanoparticle radiosensitization in head and neck cancers. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2020; 15:2837-2850. [DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2020-0301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as radiosensitizers may offer a new approach in the treatment of head and neck cancers; minimizing treatment-associated toxicities and improving patient outcomes. AuNPs promote localized dose deposition; permitting improved local control and/or dose reduction. Aim: This work aimed to address the theoretical optimization of radiation doses, fractionation and nanoparticle injection schedules to maximize therapeutic benefits. Materials & methods: Probabilistic nanoparticle sensitization factors were incorporated into the individual cell-based HYP-RT computer model of tumor growth and radiotherapy. Results: Total dose outcomes across all radiation therapy treatment regimens were found to be significantly reduced with the presence of AuNPs, with bi-weekly injections showing the most decrease. Conclusion: Outcomes suggest the need for regular AuNP administration to permit effective radiosensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myxuan Huynh
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ivan Kempson
- Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes 5095, South Australia, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Wendy Phillips
- Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Medical Physics, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gupta T, Ghosh-Laskar S, Agarwal JP. Resource-sparing curative-intent hypofractionated-accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: More relevant than ever before in the COVID era. Oral Oncol 2020; 111:105045. [PMID: 33091846 PMCID: PMC7572312 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.105045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing worldwide, with over three quarters of cases now diagnosed in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) with resource-constraints. Loco-regional recurrence remains the predominant pattern of failure mandating adequate local therapy for acceptable loco-regional control and survival. There is high-quality evidence that intensification of treatment by either by adding concurrent chemotherapy or by altering radiotherapy (RT) fractionation improves outcomes in the curative-intent management of loco-regionally advanced HNSCC. Even conservative estimates indicate that >50% of patients in LMIC are unlikely to get access to timely RT, which will only get compounded with the coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic. The radiation oncology community has been systematically testing altered fractionation schedules in several solid cancers (breast, lung, and head-neck), given the cost-effectiveness, convenience, and compliance to short-course RT regimens. Radiobiological modelling suggests that standard fractionation of 6-7 weeks in HNSCC can be compressed safely into a 4-week schedule to counter accelerated repopulation by increasing the dose per fraction and delivering 5 fractions per week which is currently being tested in the ongoing multicentric trial of hypo- vs normo-fractionated accelerated RT (HYPNO study). Herein, we discuss the radiobiological basis of curative-intent hypofractionated-accelerated RT schedule delivering 55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks in HNSCC followed by critical appraisal of the published literature on such regimens with concurrent systemic therapy and its inherent resource-sparing potential applicable across large parts of the world particularly in the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tejpal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, HBNI, Mumbai, India.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Enver N, Şahin A, Sönmez S, Demokan S. Most Cited Articles in Head and Neck Oncology. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2020; 100:1061S-1072S. [PMID: 32579405 DOI: 10.1177/0145561320934920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The number of citations an article receives is an important indication of its impact. The main objectives of this investigation provide readers with a practical guide in evaluating head and neck oncology literature and determine the characteristics of trends in ORL. METHODS This was a retrospective bibliometric analysis that did not involve human participant. The Thomson Reuters Web of Science was searched to determine the citations of all published HNO articles. Most cited 300 article analyzed and a total of 100 articles were included in our investigation under the topic search "Head AND NECK AND (cancer OR carcinoma OR oncology)." Articles include malignancies other than head and neck are excluded. The top 100 cited articles were selected and analyzed by 2 independent investigators. Country, Institution, First Author, Journal name, study design, cites per year information gathered and analyzed. RESULTS The journal with the highest number of top 100 cited articles was New England Journal Of Medicine with 19 paper, followed by The Journal of Clinical Oncology(17) and Cancer Research (12). The top article on the list (Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck-NEJM) has 2243 citations. A statistically significant association was found between the journal impact factor and the number of top 100 cited articles (P < .05). The United States had the highest number of articles (63). John Hopkins is differed from other institutions with 15 contributing articles. CONCLUSION Our analysis provides an insight into the citation frequency of top cited articles published in HNO to help recognize the quality of the works, discoveries and the trends steering the study of HNO. This is also a modern reading list for young HNO scientist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Necati Enver
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Akın Şahin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Said Sönmez
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Semra Demokan
- Department of Basic Oncology, Oncology Institute, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Adrian G, Gebre-Medhin M, Kjellén E, Wieslander E, Zackrisson B, Nilsson P. Altered fractionation diminishes importance of tumor volume in oropharyngeal cancer: Subgroup analysis of ARTSCAN-trial. Head Neck 2020; 42:2099-2105. [PMID: 32196826 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large tumor volume negatively impacts the outcome of radiation therapy (RT). Altered fractionation (AF) can improve local control (LC) compared with conventional fractionation (CF). The aim of the present study was to investigate if response to AF differs with tumor volume in oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS Three hundred and twenty four patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated in a randomized, phase III trial comparing CF (2 Gy/d, 5 d/wk, 7 weeks, total dose 68 Gy) to AF (1.1 Gy + 2 Gy/d, 5 d/wk, 4.5 weeks, total dose 68 Gy) were analyzed. RESULTS Tumor volume had less impact on LC for patients treated with AF. There was an interaction between tumor volume and fractionation schedule (P = .039). This differential response was in favor of CF for small tumors and of AF for large tumors. CONCLUSION AF diminishes the importance of tumor volume for local tumor control in oropharyngeal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel Adrian
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Maria Gebre-Medhin
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Elinore Wieslander
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Medical Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer: feasibility experience from a Government cancer centre of Eastern India in a resource-constrained setting. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396919000323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurpose:Radiation therapy (RT), in combination with chemotherapy, is the mainstay in the treatment for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. We analysed the tumour response and the toxicity profiles in patients having locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers receiving hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy with Cisplatin investigating the feasibility and radiobiological efficacy of the regimen, along with its use as a resource-sparing alternative for a high-volume centre.Material and Methods:The records of 41 eligible patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx, registered from September 2015 to April 2017, treated with hypofractionated IMRT with concurrent Cisplatin, were analysed from the hospital database. Patients received concurrent chemo-radiation with 2 cycles of 3-weekly cisplatin on day 1 and day 22 along with hypofractionated IMRT, 55 Gy delivered in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. Patients were observed for any radiation reaction or chemotherapy toxicity at least once a week during the course of radiation therapy.Results:Twenty-nine patients (70·7%) achieved complete response and remaining 12 showed partial response. Acute grade 3 toxicity was observed mostly in the form of oral mucositis and radiation dermatitis. Both grade 3 oral mucositis and radiation dermatitis were seen in 15 patients (36·6%) and 7 patients (17%), respectively. The most common late toxicities were dysphagia and dry mouth. Twenty-five patients (61%) completed the overall treatment within 4 weeks’ duration.Conclusion:This hypofractionated regimen is feasible and was associated with tolerable acute and late morbidity and satisfactory locoregional response. Larger prospective, multi- institutional studies examining similar schedules may be undertaken to establish this as a standard practice, particularly for a high-volume centre.
Collapse
|
17
|
O'Sullivan B, Hui Huang S, Keane T, Xu W, Su J, Waldron J, Gullane P, Liu FF, Warde P, Payne D, Tong L, Cummings B. Durable therapeutic gain despite competing mortality in long-term follow-up of a randomized hyperfractionated radiotherapy trial for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 21:69-76. [PMID: 32055717 PMCID: PMC7005479 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objectives To examine the therapeutic ratio and mortality profile over time in a radiotherapy randomized trial in stage III-IV larynx/pharynx cancer with long-term follow-up. Materials/methods From 1988 to 1995, 331 cases were randomized to either hyperfractionated (HF) (58 Gy/40 fractions, twice daily) or conventional (CF) (51 Gy/20 fractions, once daily) radiotherapy. Overall survival (OS), locoregional (LRC), distant control (DC), ≥Grade 3 late toxicity (LT), and relative mortality risk profile over time were compared between both arms. Results Median follow-up was 13.6 years. HF had a 10% improved OS at 5-years (40% vs 30%, p = 0.04), but the benefit diminished to 3% at 10-years (21% vs 18%). A trend towards higher LRC with HF remained (5-year: 49% vs 40%; 10-year: 49% vs 39%, p = 0.05). DC rates were unchanged (5-year: 87% vs 85%; 10-year: 87 vs 84%, p = 0.56). LT rates were similar (HF vs CF: 5-year: 9% vs 12%; 10-year: 11% vs 14%, p = 0.27). Multivariable analysis confirmed that HF reduced mortality risk by 31% [HR 0.69 (0.55-0.88), p < 0.01] and locoregional failure risk by 35% [HR 0.65 (0.48-0.89), p < 0.01]. Index cancer mortality (5-year: 46% vs 51%; 10-year: 49% vs 55%) was lower in the HF arm. Competing mortality (mostly smoking-related) was also numerically lower with HF at 5-years (14% vs 19%) but became similar at 10-years (30% vs 28%). Conclusions This trial confirms that HF with augmented total dose has a durable 10% effect size on LRC with comparable LT. OS benefit is evident at 5-years (10%) but relative mortality risk profile changes in longer follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Shao Hui Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Thomas Keane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Wei Xu
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jie Su
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - John Waldron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Patrick Gullane
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Fei-Fei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - David Payne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Li Tong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Bernard Cummings
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
|
19
|
Ma DJ, Price KA, Moore EJ, Patel SH, Hinni ML, Garcia JJ, Graner DE, Neben-Wittich M, Garces YI, Chintakuntlawar AV, Price DL, Van Abel KM, Kasperbauer JL, Janus JR, Waddle M, Miller RC, Shiraishi S, Mutter RW, Corbin KS, Park SS, Foote RL. Reply to A.S. Garden. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:3559-3560. [PMID: 31557088 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Ma
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Katharine A Price
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Eric J Moore
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Samir H Patel
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michael L Hinni
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Joaquin J Garcia
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Darlene E Graner
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Michelle Neben-Wittich
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yolanda I Garces
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ashish V Chintakuntlawar
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Daniel L Price
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kathryn M Van Abel
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jan L Kasperbauer
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jeffrey R Janus
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Mark Waddle
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert C Miller
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Satomi Shiraishi
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Kimberly S Corbin
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Sean S Park
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert L Foote
- Daniel J. Ma, MD; Katharine A. Price, MD; and Eric J. Moore, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Samir H. Patel, MD and Michael L. Hinni, MD, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ; Joaquin J. Garcia, MD; Darlene E. Graner, SLPD; Michelle Neben-Wittich, MD; Yolanda I. Garces, MD; Ashish V. Chintakuntlawar, MBBS, PhD; Daniel L. Price, MD; Kathryn M. Van Abel, MD; Jan L. Kasperbauer, MD; and Jeffrey R. Janus, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mark Waddle, MD, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Robert C. Miller, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; and Satomi Shiraishi, PhD; Robert W. Mutter, MD; Kimberly S. Corbin, MD; Sean S. Park, MD, PhD; and Robert L. Foote, MD, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S Garden
- Adam S. Garden, MD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Marcu LG, Marcu D. The role of hypofractionated radiotherapy in the management of head and neck cancer - a modelling approach. J Theor Biol 2019; 482:109998. [PMID: 31493484 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.109998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 08/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer stem cells (CSCs) and hypoxia are key contributors towards radioresistance and they influence the choice of radiotherapy schedule for optimal tumour control. Since hypofractionation is becoming more popular in head and neck cancer (HNC) management, the aim of this work is to use a modelling approach to evaluate the efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy on both early stage and advanced tumours. METHODS An in silico HNC was developed starting from one CSC. For a biologically indorsed tumour, CSCs generate all heterogeneous cell lineages with a 1.9% probability of symmetrical division, 33 h mean cell cycle time and 52 days volume doubling time. The simulated schedules include conventional, hyperfractionated, and hypofractionated radiotherapy and they target tumours with various oxygenation levels. RESULTS Oxic and mildly hypoxic tumours can benefit from hypofractionation, which reduces treatment time without increasing adverse events. Advanced tumours are only controlled by hyperfractionation, however a tumour with oxygen levels below 6 mmHg and 5.9% pre-treatment CSCs, needs either a dose greater than 81.6 Gy to be eradicated or the addition of adjuvant therapies. CONCLUSIONS Hypofractionation is suited for early stage tumours, whereas aggressive HNC require hyperfractionation. The interplay between CSCs and hypoxia dictates the optimal treatment strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loredana G Marcu
- Faculty of Science, University of Oradea, Oradea 410087, Romania; Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, SA 5005, Australia.
| | - David Marcu
- Faculty of Science, University of Oradea, Oradea 410087, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zhu B, Kou C, Bai W, Yu W, Zhang L, Yu X, Xu W, Wang H, Xin Y, Jiang X. Accelerated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy versus Conventional Fractionation Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2019; 2019:7634746. [PMID: 31885584 PMCID: PMC6914880 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7634746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The benefits of accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HART) and conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CFRT) in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) remain controversial. In this study, we analyzed the therapeutic effects of these two treatment regimens to explore whether HART can improve the overall survival (OS) rate and locoregional control (LRC) rate in patients with HNC. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for eligible studies. The OS rate and LRC rate were considered as the efficacy outcomes. I 2 was used to test the heterogeneity among studies with a cutoff value of 50%. Potential publication bias was assessed by funnel plots and Egger's test. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to assess the stability of the results. In this meta-analysis, all analyses were performed using R 3.5.3 software. RESULTS Twelve qualified articles including a total of 2,935 patients were identified. HART had a significant beneficial effect on OS rate (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.98). Compared with CFRT, HART demonstrated a significantly higher LRC rate (HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.96). CONCLUSION Our meta-analysis showed that HART can significantly improve OS and LRC compared with CFRT in patients with HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Zhu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Changgui Kou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Wei Bai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Weiying Yu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Lili Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Xiao Yu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Wen Xu
- Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Huanhuan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Ying Xin
- Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - Xin Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Antognoni P, Corvò R, Zerini D, Orecchia R. Altered Fractionation Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Issues and Pitfalls of “Evidence-Based Medicine”. TUMORI JOURNAL 2019; 91:30-9. [PMID: 15850002 DOI: 10.1177/030089160509100107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The authors present a critical appraisal of the biological bases of altered fractionation and a brief overview of published randomized trials with conventional fractionation as the control arm, reviews and meta-analysis on altered fractionation radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. The major controversial issues emerging from these studies are reviewed and the limiting factors which so far have prevented the widespread use of altered fractionation regimens in current clinical practice are analyzed. Future perspectives regarding predictive biological assays for patient selection and the integration of altered fractionation regimens with radiochemotherapy protocols, biomodulators and novel radiotherapy techniques are also reviewed and summarized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Antognoni
- Servizio di Radioterapia, CdC Santa Maria-Multimedica Hospitals, Castellanza, VA, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shuryak I, Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Optimized Hypofractionation Can Markedly Improve Tumor Control and Decrease Late Effects for Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 104:272-278. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
25
|
Jethwa KR, Park SS, Gonuguntla K, Wick SM, Vallow LA, Deufel CL, Whitaker TJ, Furutani KM, Ruddy KJ, Corbin KS, Hieken TJ, Mutter RW. Three-Fraction Intracavitary Accelerated Partial Breast Brachytherapy: Early Provider and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Novel Regimen. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 104:75-82. [PMID: 30583041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.12.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report early adverse events and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of 3-fraction intracavitary catheter-based partial breast brachytherapy (ICBB). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eligible women ≥50 years of age with ≤2.5-cm, lymph node-negative invasive or in situ breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery and placement of a brachytherapy applicator. ICBB was initiated on the second weekday after surgery and prescribed to 21 Gy in 3 once-daily fractions. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0; 10-point linear analog scale assessment; the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; and the Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale were used for provider and patient-reported assessments. RESULTS Seventy-three women were treated for invasive (79%) or in situ (21%) breast cancer. The median time to completion of surgery and radiation therapy was 6 days. After 14-months median follow-up, 2 patients (3%) had developed breast infections that resolved with oral antibiotics. There was no other treatment-associated adverse event grade ≥2. The grade 1 seroma rate at 3 months was 20%, which dropped to 8% at 12 months; no events required intervention. At 12 months, 91% of patients reported an overall quality of life score as ≥8 of 10, and patient-reported cosmesis was good or excellent in 95%. All patients are alive without relapse at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Three-fraction ICBB is associated with low rates of early provider and patient- reported adverse events and compares favorably with early outcomes of more protracted ICBB regimens, including twice-daily (3.4 Gy × 10) fractionation studied in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-39. Further investigation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Stephanie M Wick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Laura A Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | | | - Keith M Furutani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Tina J Hieken
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Letters to the Editor. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2018; 253:699-702. [DOI: 10.2460/javma.253.6.699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
27
|
Liu Y, Kou C, Bai W, Liu X, Song Y, Zhang L, Wang M, Zhang Y, You Y, Yin Y, Jiang X, Xin Y. Altered fractionation radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer: a network meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 2018; 11:5465-5483. [PMID: 30233208 PMCID: PMC6129020 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s172018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted in patients with head and neck cancers (HNCs) to estimate the efficacy and safety of treatment with conventional fractionation radiotherapy (CF), conventional fractionation chemoradiotherapy (CF_CRT), hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HF), hyperfractionated chemoradiotherapy (HF_CRT), accelerated fractionation radiotherapy, accelerated fractionation chemoradiotherapy, accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (HART) or accelerated hyperfractionated chemoradiotherapy (HACRT) to identify superior treatments to aid in clinical decisions. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for potentially eligible randomized controlled trials up to December 2016. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional control (LRC) were considered efficacy outcomes, whereas acute toxicity and late toxicity on skin and mucosa were considered safety outcomes. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to rank each treatment in each index. RESULTS Data from 72 trials with 21,868 participants were included in the analysis. Concerning OS, all treatments were associated with a significant advantage compared to CF alone, with HR effect sizes ranging from 0.64 to 0.83, and HACRT was significantly more effective than all the other treatments. The network comparisons of both HACRT vs HART and HF_CRT vs HF demonstrated a higher OS benefit, with an HR of 0.78 (95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.64-0.95) and 0.78 (95% CrI: 0.61-0.99), respectively. The results of SUCRA indicated that HACRT had the best ranking for OS and LRC, HF_CRT for DFS, HART for acute and late skin toxicity, CF_CRT for acute mucosal toxicity and HF_CRT for late mucosal toxicity. CONCLUSION The NMA results support the notion that HACRT is the preferable treatment modality for HNCs because it has better rankings in all three efficacy indexes, although it does present a high risk of acute mucosal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingyu Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Changgui Kou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Wei Bai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Xinyu Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yan Song
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Lili Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Mohan Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yangyu Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yueyue You
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yue Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xin Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China,
| | - Ying Xin
- Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sanguineti G, Sormani MP, Benasso M, Corvò R, Foppiano F, Ricci I, Marcenaro M, Rosso R, Vitale V. Late Local Treatment Morbidity after Accelerated Radiotherapy or Alternating Chemoradiotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 88:313-20. [PMID: 12400983 DOI: 10.1177/030089160208800413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background To report local long-term morbidity after concomitant boost radiotherapy (AFRT) or alternating chemoradiotherapy (CTRT), we analyzed the toxicity data recorded in 168 patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated at our institution within phase II-III studies. Patients and Methods All patients enrolled in three consecutive phase II-III studies and followed for a minimum of three months after the end of treatment were included in the present analysis. Local late reactions were scored prospectively. The actuarial incidence of grade 2 or more (2-4) late local toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC was taken as endpoint. The median follow-up is 32.0 months (range, 3.3-138.1 months). For living patients the minimum and median follow-up are 12.1 and 69.3 months, respectively. Results The five-year actuarial incidence of grade 2+ and grade 3+ toxicity are 56.7 ± 5% and 21 ± 4%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, acute mucositis grade, complementary surgery, primary site and performance status proved to be independent predictive factors of grade 2+ late toxicity with P values of <0.001, 0.009, 0.022 and 0.033, respectively. No effect was found for treatment itself on the incidence of late toxicity, although patients treated with accelerated radiotherapy had a higher probability of confluent mucositis than patients treated with alternating chemoradiotherapy (68% vs 32%, P <0.01). Conclusions A substantial proportion of surviving patients develops late complications, although severe irreversible reactions occur in a minority of patients. Acute local toxicity can be used to predict local late toxicity that arises within five years of the end of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Sanguineti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, ltaly.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Olmi P, Fallai C. Randomized Trials on Altered Fractionation in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy with Conventional Fractionation as Control Arm: Another Lap to Go. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 84:160-6. [PMID: 9620240 DOI: 10.1177/030089169808400212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The Authors present a review of randomized trials on non conventional fractionation in head and neck cancer radiotherapy with conventional fractionation as control arm. Hyperfractionation was studied in 5 trials, accelerated hyperfractionation in 4 trials and accelerated fractionation in 3 trials. Furthermore, the reviews of eminent Authors dealing with the above mentioned trials are summarized. In spite of improved local control rate reported with hyperfractionation, non conventional radiotherapy schedules are not yet recommended as routine clinical practice, but all the radiation oncologists are invited to join trials on this subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Olmi
- Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Differences between late-responding (slowly proliferating) normal tissues and early-responding (rapidly proliferating) normal tissues and tumor cells and the event of tumor cell repopulation occurring during treatment have essentially led to the development of altered fractionation schemes. Altered fractionation regimens mainly refer to schedules utilising two or more (small dose) fractions per day for part of or for the entire treatment course. It must be underlined that a true standard or conventional fractionation regimen does not exist: no schedule is universally recognised as the standard of reference to be compared with. However, continental European and U.S. conventional regimens are the considered control arm with which the new experimental regimens have to be compared. For this reason they are generally recognised as the standards. The basic rationale for hyperfractionated or accelerated regimens respectively lies in the possibility (a) to deliver higher total doses reducing late-responding normal tissue damage, (b) to deliver total doses in a reduced overall treatment time to defeat tumor clonogen repopulation. Multiple fractions per day should not be delivered with interfraction intervals smaller than 6 hours. Clinical results of phase I-II and limited but convincing phase III randomised trials suggest that a therapeutic benefit can be achieved with new altered regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Valdagni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Casa di Cura S. Pio X, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Shuryak I, Hall EJ, Brenner DJ. Dose dependence of accelerated repopulation in head and neck cancer: Supporting evidence and clinical implications. Radiother Oncol 2018. [PMID: 29534828 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Accelerated repopulation (AR) can compromise tumor control after conventional radiotherapy for fast-growing tumors. Standard AR models assume it begins at a fixed time, with repopulation rates independent of the number of clonogens killed. We investigate the validity and significance of an alternative model where onset-time and rate of AR depend on the number of clonogens killed, and thus on dose and dose-fractionation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed tumor control (TCP) from randomized trials for head and neck cancer (HNC, 7283 patients), featuring wide ranges of doses, times, and fractionation-schemes. We used the linear-quadratic model with the standard dose-independent AR model, or with an alternative dose-dependent model, where AR onset and rate depend on clonogen killing. RESULTS The alternative dose-dependent model of AR provides significantly-improved descriptions of a wide range of randomized clinical data, relative to the standard dose-independent model. This preferred model predicts that, for currently-used HNC fractionation schemes, the last 5 fractions do not increase TCP, but simply compensate for increased accelerated repopulation. CONCLUSIONS The preferred dose-dependent AR model predicts that, for standard fractionation schemes currently used to treat HNC, the final week (5 fractions) could be eliminated without compromising TCP, but resulting in significantly decreased late sequelae due to the lower overall dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
| | - Eric J Hall
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - David J Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lowe NM, Bernstein JM, Mais K, Garcez K, Lee LW, Sykes A, Thomson DJ, Homer JJ, West CM, Slevin NJ. Taxane, platinum and 5-FU prior to chemoradiotherapy benefits patients with stage IV neck node-positive head and neck cancer and a good performance status. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018; 144:389-401. [PMID: 29222650 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2553-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The benefit of adding docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains uncertain. We aimed to investigate whether ICT is well tolerated when given with prophylactic treatment against predicted adverse effects and which patients benefit most. METHODS A single-centre audit identified 132 HNSCC patients with stage IVa/b neck node-positive disease, prescribed TPF followed by CRT. TPF involved three cycles of docetaxel (75 mg/m2 IV) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 IV) on day 1 plus 5-FU (750 mg/m2 IV) on days 2-5. Planned CRT was 66 Gy in 30 fractions of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 IV) at the beginning of week 1 and 4 (days 1 and 22). All patients received prophylactic antibiotics and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. RESULTS Median follow-up was 39.5 months. 92.4% of patients completed three cycles of TPF; 95.5% of patients started chemoradiotherapy. Grade 3/4 adverse events were low (febrile neutropenia 3.0%), with no toxicity-related deaths. 3-year overall survival was 67.2%; disease-specific survival was 78.7%; locoregional control was 78.3%. Distant metastases rate was 9.8% (3.0% in those without locoregional recurrence). Good performance status (p = 0.002) and poor tumour differentiation (p = 0.018) were associated with improved overall survival on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION With prophylactic antibiotics and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor TPF was well tolerated with good survival outcomes. TPF should remain a treatment option for stage IV neck node-positive patients with a good performance status. The use of tumour grade to aid patient selection for TPF warrants investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie M Lowe
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK.
- Head and Neck Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK.
| | - Jonathan M Bernstein
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, The Royal Marsden, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
| | - Kathleen Mais
- Head and Neck Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Kate Garcez
- Head and Neck Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Lip W Lee
- Head and Neck Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Andrew Sykes
- Head and Neck Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
| | - David J Thomson
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
- Head and Neck Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Jarrod J Homer
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
- University Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, England, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Catharine M West
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Nicholas J Slevin
- Translational Radiobiology Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
- Head and Neck Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, England, M20 4BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
[Reasons for the terms "radiosurgery" and "Gamma Knife"]. HNO 2017; 65:775-776. [PMID: 28776076 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-017-0396-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
34
|
Yamazaki H, Suzuki G, Nakamura S, Yoshida K, Konishi K, Teshima T, Ogawa K. Radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer-technical aspects and alternate fractionation. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2017; 58:495-508. [PMID: 28898958 PMCID: PMC5569999 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2017] [Revised: 03/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Early laryngeal, especially glottic, cancer is a good candidate for radiotherapy because obvious early symptoms (e.g. hoarseness) make earlier treatment possible and with highly successful localized control. This type of cancer is also a good model for exploring the basic principles of radiation oncology and several key findings (e.g. dose, fractionation, field size, patient fixation, and overall treatment time) have been noted. For example, unintended poor outcomes have been reported during transition from 60Cobalt to linear accelerator installation in the 1960s, with usage of higher energy photons causing poor dose distribution. In addition, shell fixation made precise dose delivery possible, but simultaneously elevated toxicity if a larger treatment field was necessary. Of particular interest to the radiation therapy community was altered fractionation gain as a way to improve local tumor control and survival rate. Unfortunately, this interest ceased with advancements in chemotherapeutic agents because alternate fractionation could not improve outcomes in chemoradiotherapy settings. At present, no form of acceleration can potentially compensate fully for the lack of concurrent chemotherapy. In addition, the substantial workload associated with this technique made it difficult to add extra fractionation routinely in busy clinical hospitals. Hypofractionation, on the other hand, uses a larger single fractionation dose (2-3 Gy), making it a reasonable and attractive option for T1-T2 early glottic cancer because it can improve local control without the additional workload. Recently, Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 0701 reprised its role in early T1-T2 glottic cancer research, demonstrating that this strategy could be an optional standard therapy. Herein, we review radiotherapy history from 60Cobalt to modern linear accelerator, with special focus on the role of alternate fractionation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602–8566, Japan
| | - Gen Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602–8566, Japan
| | - Satoaki Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602–8566, Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Medical College, 2–7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki-City, Osaka, 569–8686, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 133 Nakamichi, Higashinari, Osaka 537–8511, Japan
| | - Teruki Teshima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 133 Nakamichi, Higashinari, Osaka 537–8511, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamadaoka 2–2, Suita, 565–0871 Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gasymova E, Meier V, Guscetti F, Cancedda S, Roos M, Rohrer Bley C. Retrospective clinical study on outcome in cats with nasal planum squamous cell carcinoma treated with an accelerated radiation protocol. BMC Vet Res 2017; 13:86. [PMID: 28376918 PMCID: PMC5381142 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1018-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 04/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal planum in cats is a common indication for antitumor treatment such as external beam radiation therapy. Curative-intent radiation therapy has been described as a valuable treatment option, resulting in long and stable tumor control in these patients. The aim of the current study was to evaluate outcome and toxicity, as well as possible prognostic factors using an accelerated hypofractionated radiation therapy protocol. Cats with squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal planum treated with an accelerated radiation protocol (10 × 4.8 Gy, over one week) were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor- and treatment-associated variables were evaluated in respect to local control and survival. RESULTS Forty-four cats met the inclusion criteria for this study. All cats showed complete response to therapy. Median disease-free interval (DFI) for all cases was 916 days (95% CI: 456-1377). One- and two-year DFIs were 71% (95% CI: 56-86%) and 60% (95% CI: 43-77%). Of the tested variables, only tumor volume showed a tendency to influence DFI, with larger tumors having a 5.4 times greater risk of recurrence than the smaller ones (HR 1.33 (95% CI: 0.99-1.79), p = 0.054). Median overall survival (OS) was 902 days (95% CI: 862-942). One- and 2-year OSs were 79.3% (95% CI: 67.3-91.3) and 58.4% (95% CI: 42.8-74). Of the tested variables, again, only tumor volume influenced OS with larger tumors having a 6.3 times greater risk of dying than the smaller ones (HR 1.36 (95% CI: 1.07-1.73), p = 0.010). The acute and late toxicity profile was low and hence clinically acceptable. CONCLUSIONS Curative-intent radiation therapy with an accelerated fractionation schedule can be considered a safe, cosmetically superior treatment option for cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the nasal planum in cats, resulting in long and stable tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evgeniya Gasymova
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Valeria Meier
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Franco Guscetti
- Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simona Cancedda
- Centro Oncologico Veterinario, 40037 Sasso Marconi (BO), Italy
| | - Malgorzata Roos
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, CH-8001 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Carla Rohrer Bley
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ringash J, Waldron JN, Siu LL, Martino R, Winquist E, Wright JR, Nabid A, Hay JH, Hammond A, Sultanem K, Hotte S, Leong C, El-Gayed AAH, Naz F, Ramchandar K, Owen TE, Montenegro A, O'Sullivan B, Chen BE, Parulekar WR. Quality of life and swallowing with standard chemoradiotherapy versus accelerated radiotherapy and panitumumab in locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the head and neck: A phase III randomised trial from the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (HN.6). Eur J Cancer 2016; 72:192-199. [PMID: 28040660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Revised: 11/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM To compare quality of life (QOL) between standard (SFX) chemoradiotherapy (arm A) and altered fractionation radiotherapy (AFX) with panitumumab (PMab; arm B). METHODS Patients with T any N + M0 or T3-4N0M0 squamous cell head-neck carcinoma were randomised to SFX (70 Gy/35/7 wks) plus cisplatin (100 mg/m2 IV × 3) versus AFX (70 Gy/35/6 wks) plus PMab (9 mg/kg IV × 3). QOL was collected at baseline, end of radiation therapy (RT) and 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-RT using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Head and Neck (FACT-H&N), MD Anderson Dysphagia Index (MDADI) and SWAL-QOL. We hypothesised a 6-point more favourable change in FACT-H&N score from baseline to 1 year in arm B over arm A. RESULTS Among 320 patients, median follow-up was 46 (range: 0.1-64.3) months, median age 56, 84% male, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS 0 (71%), 1 (29%). Primary site was oropharynx in 81% (p16+ 68%, p16- 16%, missing 16%). Baseline scores did not differ by arm (A/B): FACT-H&N 116.5/115, MDADI Global 83/77, SWAL-QOL General 67/68. At 1 year, no difference was seen between arms in FACT-H&N change from baseline: A -1.70, B -4.81, p = 0.194. Subscale change scores by arm were (A/B): last week RT, FACT-Physical (-11.6, -10, p = 0.049), MDADI Physical (-40.4, -33.9, p = 0.045), and SWAL-QOL Eating Duration (-61.2, -51.2, p = 0.02), Eating Desire (-53.3, -43.9, p = 0.031) and Mental Health (-42, -32.6, p = 0.009); 4 months, HN subscale (-7.7, -10, p = 0.014). No clinically important differences by arm were seen post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS PMab with AFX did not durably improve QOL or swallowing as compared with SFX with cisplatin. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00820248.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolie Ringash
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - John N Waldron
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lillian L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rosemary Martino
- Department of Speech Language Pathology and Krembil Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Abdenour Nabid
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | - John H Hay
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Alex Hammond
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Carson Leong
- British Columbia Cancer Agency - Fraser Valley Centre, Fraser Valley, BC, Canada
| | | | - Farah Naz
- Horizon Health Network - Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, NB, Canada
| | - Kevin Ramchandar
- Northwestern Ontario Regional Cancer Care, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Brian O'Sullivan
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Szutkowski Z, Kawecki A, Jarząbski A, Laskus Z, Krajewski R, Michalski W, Kukołowicz P. Hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy in T1-3 N0 cancer of the larynx: A prospective cohort study with historical controls. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016; 21:537-543. [PMID: 27698593 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2016] [Revised: 05/27/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The goal of this prospective study was to assess the effectiveness of a hypofractionated accelerated regime in treatment of the larynx cancer. BACKGROUND Multiple radiotherapy delivery regimes are used for treatment of the larynx cancer. Hypofractionated regimes could provide similar results with reduced use of radiotherapy facilities. MATERIAL AND METHODS 223 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper or middle larynx have been treated with 63 Gy delivered in 28 fractions of 2.25 Gy during 38 days, 5 fractions per week. The study endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, early and late treatment toxicity. Standard and accelerated radiotherapy groups from the study published by Hliniak et al.20 served as controls. RESULTS Five-year actuarial overall survival was 87.5% in the study group, 84.5% in the control group receiving accelerated radiotherapy (33 fractions of 2.0 Gy, 6 fractions per week) and 86.2% in the control group (33 fractions of 2.0 Gy, 5 fractions per week). Five-year progression-free survival was 73.6%, 77.2% and 66.2%, respectively. Overall, treatment toxicity and complication rates did not differ between the study group and the control groups. CONCLUSIONS The hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy protocol using 5 fractions per week reduced the use of radiotherapy facilities. There was no significant difference in overall survival and progression-free survival between the study and control groups treated with accelerated or standard radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zbigniew Szutkowski
- Head and Neck Cancer Department, Cancer Center - M. Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrzej Kawecki
- Head and Neck Cancer Department, Cancer Center - M. Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Andrzej Jarząbski
- Head and Neck Cancer Department, Cancer Center - M. Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Zofia Laskus
- Head and Neck Cancer Department, Cancer Center - M. Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Romuald Krajewski
- Head and Neck Cancer Department, Cancer Center - M. Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Michalski
- Department of Biostatistics, Cancer Center - M. Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Kukołowicz
- Medical Physics Department, Cancer Center - M. Curie-Sklodowska Memorial Institute, ul. Roentgena 5, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Eliashar R, Gross M, Goldfarb A, Sichel JY. Purulent Chondritis of the Laryngeal Framework Cartilages. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016; 114:219-22. [PMID: 15825572 DOI: 10.1177/000348940511400309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This manuscript reports on our experience with purulent chondritis of the laryngeal cartilages (PCLC), an entity that has not yet been described. Three patients had a diagnosis of PCLC. The probable causes were relapsing polychondritis, a previous prolonged intubation, and an idiopathic cause. The patients suffered from hoarseness and inspiratory stridor for 1 to 3 months before diagnosis. None complained of pain in the neck. Laryngoscopy showed supraglottic edema. A computed tomography scan revealed abscess formation between the intact inner and outer perichondria of the thyroid cartilage. The treatment included rigid endoscopy, external incision and drainage, and prolonged medical therapy. The culture results were Staphylococcus aureus in the first 2 cases and Aspergillus fumigatus in the third. The second patient (in whom the cricoid cartilage was also affected) required emergency tracheotomy. The other 2 patients did not require airway intervention. The rarity of PCLC and the relatively mild symptoms require a high index of suspicion for its diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Eliashar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Hebrew University School of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rejec A, Benoit J, Tutt C, Crossley D, Butinar J, Hren NI. Evaluation of an Accelerated Chemoradiotherapy Protocol for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in 5 Cats and 3 Dogs. J Vet Dent 2016; 32:212-21. [PMID: 27012058 DOI: 10.1177/089875641503200401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Accelerated radiation therapy protocols address the specific biology of aggressive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and this approach was applied in 5 feline and 3 canine oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients where surgery was not possible (4/5 feline and 2/3 canine cases) or was declined (1/5 feline and 1/3 canine cases). A protocol using 14 fractions of 3.5 Gy over 9-days, combined with carboplatin chemotherapy as a radiosensitiser (total dose 180 mg/m2 in feline and 300 mg/m2 in canine cases) resulted in a complete tumor response in most cases (4/5 feline and 3/3 canine cases) with acceptable acute and long-term side effects. Results achieved in feline cases correspond with published data where these specific radiotherapy protocols were employed. A complete response and long-term survival (> 2-years) was achieved in all canine patients. Although no standardized chemoradiotherapy protocols currently exist, this therapeutic approach can be a useful addition for the management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of cats and dogs when the goals of treatment include maximizing tumor control while maintaining function and quality of life.
Collapse
|
40
|
Cmelak AJ, Arneson K, Chau NG, Gilbert RW, Haddad RI. Locally advanced head and neck cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016:237-44. [PMID: 23714512 DOI: 10.14694/edbook_am.2013.33.237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas requires a multidisciplinary approach to be able to offer patients definitive therapy while aiming to preserve organ function and minimize acute and long-term toxicities. Advances in surgical techniques will be reviewed for both primary sites and the neck and also in the salvage settings. Recent data on concurrent versus sequential chemoradiotherapy in these patients will be reviewed, with emphasis on identification of appropriate patients for sequential chemoradiotherapy. Finally, advances in modern radiotherapy modalities that have resulted in improved dosimetry and quality of life following treatment will be reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Cmelak
- From the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Nyqvist J, Fransson P, Laurell G, Hammerlid E, Kjellén E, Franzén L, Söderström K, Wickart-Johansson G, Friesland S, Sjödin H, Brun E, Ask A, Nilsson P, Ekberg L, Björk-Eriksson T, Nyman J, Lödén B, Lewin F, Reizenstein J, Lundin E, Zackrisson B. Differences in health related quality of life in the randomised ARTSCAN study; accelerated vs. conventional radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. A five year follow up. Radiother Oncol 2016; 118:335-41. [PMID: 26777124 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2015] [Revised: 12/22/2015] [Accepted: 12/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Health related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed in the randomised, prospective ARTSCAN study comparing conventional radiotherapy (CF) with accelerated radiotherapy (AF) for head and neck cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS 750 patients with squamous cell carcinoma (of any grade and stage) in the oral cavity, oro-, or hypopharynx or larynx (except T1-2, N0 glottic carcinoma) without distant metastases were randomised to either conventional fractionation (2 Gy/day, 5 days/week in 49 days, total dose 68 Gy) or accelerated fractionation (1.1+2.0 Gy/day, 5 days/week in 35 days, total dose 68 Gy). HRQoL was assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35 and HADS at baseline, at end of radiotherapy (eRT) and at 3 and 6 months and 1, 2 and 5 years after start of treatment. RESULTS The AF group reported HRQoL was significantly lower at eRT and at 3 months for most symptoms, scales and functions. Few significant differences were noted between the groups at 6 months and 5 years. Scores related to functional oral intake never reached baseline. CONCLUSION In comparison to CF, AF has a stronger adverse effect on HRQoL in the acute phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Nyqvist
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Umeå University, Sweden.
| | | | - Göran Laurell
- Department of Clinical Science Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Umeå University, Sweden; Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden
| | - Eva Hammerlid
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Elisabeth Kjellén
- Department of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Lars Franzén
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Sweden
| | - Karin Söderström
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Sweden
| | | | - Signe Friesland
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Helena Sjödin
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Brun
- Department of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Anders Ask
- Department of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Per Nilsson
- Department of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Lars Ekberg
- Department of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Sweden
| | | | - Jan Nyman
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Britta Lödén
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Karlstad Central Hospital, Sweden
| | - Freddi Lewin
- Department of Oncology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | | | - Erik Lundin
- Department of Oncology, Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping, Sweden
| | - Björn Zackrisson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Conventionally Fractionated Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy versus Altered Fractionation Radiotherapy Alone in the Definitive Management of Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 28:50-61. [PMID: 26454839 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2015] [Revised: 07/27/2015] [Accepted: 09/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Treatment intensification either by using concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or altered fractionation radiotherapy (AFRT) improves outcomes of locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The superiority of one approach over the other, however, remains to be firmly established. The aim of the present study was to compare outcomes of CCRT versus AFRT in the definitive non-surgical management of locoregionally advanced HNSCC for evidence-based decision making. MATERIALS AND METHODS An electronic search of Medline via PubMed was conducted with no language, year, or publication status restrictions. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE) were also searched electronically. Only randomised controlled trials assigning HNSCC patients randomly to conventionally fractionated CCRT or AFRT alone were included. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers and pooled using the Cochrane methodology for meta-analysis and expressed as a hazard ratio with 95% confidence intervals. Overall survival was the primary outcome of interest, whereas disease-free survival, locoregional control and toxicity were secondary end points. RESULTS Five randomised controlled trials (involving 1117 patients and 627 deaths) directly comparing conventionally fractionated CCRT with AFRT alone were included. The risk of bias in included studies was low for efficacy outcomes, but high for toxicity outcomes. The overall pooled hazard ratio of death was 0.73 (95% confidence interval = 0.62-0.86), which significantly favoured conventionally fractionated CCRT over AFRT alone (P < 0.0001). Similarly, disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.68-0.92; P = 0.002) and locoregional control (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.59-0.84; P < 0.0001) were significantly improved with CCRT. There were no significant differences in the incidence of severe acute toxicity (dermatitis and mucositis) between the two approaches of treatment intensification. Late xerostomia was significantly increased with CCRT. Significant haematological toxicity and nephrotoxicity were seen exclusively with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION There is moderate quality evidence that conventionally fractionated CCRT improves survival outcomes compared with AFRT alone in the definitive radiotherapeutic management of locoregionally advanced HNSCC. No form of acceleration can potentially compensate fully for the lack of concurrent chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
43
|
Lyhne NM, Primdahl H, Kristensen CA, Andersen E, Johansen J, Andersen LJ, Evensen J, Mortensen HR, Overgaard J. The DAHANCA 6 randomized trial: Effect of 6 vs 5 weekly fractions of radiotherapy in patients with glottic squamous cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2015; 117:91-8. [PMID: 26255764 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Revised: 07/02/2015] [Accepted: 07/02/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The DAHANCA 6 trial evaluated tumor response and morbidity after moderate accelerated radiotherapy compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in patients treated for glottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Further, the failure pattern and incidence of new primary tumors were explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS Six hundred and ninety-four patients with non-metastatic glottic SCC were randomized between six or five weekly fractions (fx/w) of radiotherapy to the same total dose. The median treatment time was 38 and 46days, respectively. The primary endpoint was loco-regional failure. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 14.5years. Of the 177 failures, 167 involved T-site. The cumulative incidence of loco-regional failure (LRF) was 21.6% in the 6fx/w group and 29.3% in the 5fx/w group and the corresponding hazard rate (HR) of LRF was 0.72 (CI: 0.53-0.97, p=0.04). The effect of acceleration on LRF was especially evident in well differentiated tumors (HR=0.42 (CI: 0.23-0.75) and in T1-2 tumors (HR=0.60 (CI: 0.41-0.89)). The HR of laryngectomy was 0.72 (CI: 0.50-1.04) in the 6fx/w group compared to the 5fx/w group. The hazards of disease-specific death, event-free survival, and overall survival were comparable between the two groups. Significantly more patients experienced severe acute mucositis in the 6fx/w group but the incidence of late morbidity was comparable between the groups. New primary tumors occurred in 22.5% of the patients. CONCLUSION Moderate accelerated radiotherapy significantly improved loco-regional control in patients with glottic SCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina M Lyhne
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Hanne Primdahl
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Elo Andersen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Hanna R Mortensen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jens Overgaard
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
González Ferreira JA, Jaén Olasolo J, Azinovic I, Jeremic B. Effect of radiotherapy delay in overall treatment time on local control and survival in head and neck cancer: Review of the literature. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2015; 20:328-39. [PMID: 26549990 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Revised: 03/31/2015] [Accepted: 05/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment delays in completing radiotherapy (RT) for many neoplasms are a major problem affecting treatment outcome, as increasingly shown in the literature. Overall treatment time (OTT) could be a critical predictor of local tumor control and/or survival. In an attempt to establish a protocol for managing delays during RT, especially for heavily overloaded units, we have extensively reviewed the available literature on head and neck cancer. We confirmed a large deleterious effect of prolonged OTT on both local control and survival of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Javier Jaén Olasolo
- Comprehensive Cancer Care Unit, Puerta del Mar and Puerto Real University Hospitals, Ana de Viya Avenue 21, 11009 Cádiz, Spain
| | - Ignacio Azinovic
- IMO-Group Medical Director, República Argentina Square 7, 28002 Madrid, Spain
| | - Branislav Jeremic
- Institute of Lung Diseases, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia ; BioIRC Centre for Biomedical Research, Kragujevac, Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yang X, Yoshida E, Cassidy RJ, Beitler JJ, Yu DS, Curran WJ, Liu T. Quantitative Ultrasonic Nakagami Imaging of Neck Fibrosis After Head and Neck Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2015; 92:407-14. [PMID: 25817529 PMCID: PMC4431929 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2014] [Revised: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of ultrasound Nakagami imaging to quantitatively assess radiation-induced neck fibrosis, a common sequela of radiation therapy (RT) to the head and neck. METHODS AND MATERIALS In a pilot study, 40 study participants were enrolled and classified into 3 subgroups: (1) a control group of 12 healthy volunteers; (2) an asymptomatic group of 11 patients who had received intensity modulated RT for head and neck cancer and had experienced no neck fibrosis; and (3) a symptomatic group of 17 post-RT patients with neck fibrosis. Each study participant underwent 1 ultrasound study in which scans were performed in the longitudinal orientation of the bilateral neck. Three Nakagami parameters were calculated to quantify radiation-induced tissue injury: Nakagami probability distribution function, shape, and scaling parameters. Physician-based assessments of the neck fibrosis were performed according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late morbidity scoring scheme, and patient-based fibrosis assessments were rated based on symptoms such as pain and stiffness. RESULTS Major discrepancies existed between physician-based and patient-based assessments of radiation-induced fibrosis. Significant differences in all Nakagami parameters were observed between the control group and 2 post-RT groups. Moreover, significant differences in Nakagami shape and scaling parameters were observed among asymptomatic and symptomatic groups. Compared with the control group, the average Nakagami shape parameter value increased by 32.1% (P<.001), and the average Nakagami scaling parameter increased by 55.7% (P<.001) for the asymptomatic group, whereas the Nakagami shape parameter increased by 74.1% (P<.001) and the Nakagami scaling parameter increased by 83.5% (P<.001) for the symptomatic group. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasonic Nakagami imaging is a potential quantitative tool to characterize radiation-induced asymptomatic and symptomatic neck fibrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofeng Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Emi Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Richard J Cassidy
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tian Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Thomson DJ, Ho KF, Ashcroft L, Denton K, Betts G, Mais KL, Garcez K, Yap BK, Lee LW, Sykes AJ, Rowbottom CG, Slevin NJ. Dose intensified hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy with synchronous cetuximab for intermediate stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol 2015; 54:88-98. [PMID: 25279959 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2014.958528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For stage II and III head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with radiotherapy alone, loco-regional recurrence is the main cause of treatment failure. Strategies to improve loco-regional control should not be at the expense of increased late normal tissue toxicity. We investigated dose-intensified hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with synchronous cetuximab. MATERIAL AND METHODS In a phase I/II trial, 27 patients with stage III or high risk stage II HNSCC were recruited. They received three dose level simultaneous integrated boost IMRT, 62.5 Gy in 25 daily fractions to planning target volume one over five weeks with synchronous cetuximab. The primary endpoint was acute toxicity. Secondary endpoints included: late toxicity and quality of life; loco-regional control, cause-specific and overall survival. RESULTS Radiotherapy was completed by 26/27 patients; for one (4%) the final fraction was omitted due to skin toxicity. All cycles of cetuximab were received by 23/27 patients. Grade 3 acute toxicities included: pain (81%), oral mucositis (78%) and dysphagia (41%). There were few grade 3 physician-recorded late toxicities, including: pain (11%), problems with teeth (8%) and weight loss (4%). At 12 months, only one (4%) patient required a feeding tube, inserted prior to treatment due to dysphagia. The maximal/peak rates of patient-reported late toxicities included: severe pain (11%), any dry mouth (89%) and swallowing dysfunction that required a soft/liquid diet (23%). At 12 months, all quality of life and most symptoms mean scores had resolved to baseline or were only a little worse; dry mouth, sticky saliva and dentition scores remained very much worse. At a median follow-up of 47 months, there were five (18.5%) loco-regional recurrences and the overall cause-specific survival was 79% (95% CI 53-92). CONCLUSIONS This regimen is safe with acceptable acute toxicity, low rates of late toxicity and impact on quality of life at 12 months following treatment. Further evaluation is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Thomson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester , UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pedicini P, Caivano R, Fiorentino A, Strigari L. Clinical radiobiology of head and neck cancer: the hypothesis of stem cell activation. Clin Transl Oncol 2014; 17:469-76. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-014-1261-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Accepted: 11/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
48
|
[Long-term results and cause of failure analysis in larynx cancer patients irradiated conventionally and with accelerated fractionation schedules in 1995-1998]. Otolaryngol Pol 2014; 68:320-7. [PMID: 25441938 DOI: 10.1016/j.otpol.2014.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Revised: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 05/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The clinical material consists of 217 patients with squamous cell carcinoma in supraglottic and glottic larynx in clinical stage T1-3N0M0 irradiated radically in Warsaw Oncology Centre in 1995-1998. All patients were treated with Co-60, according to two schedules of fractionation, with maintenance of the consistent therapeutic protocol. The same team of doctors worked on the treatment of patients and on the follow-up as well. The clinical material is a part of a three-phased clinical trial KBN 0295. In the course of observation, the progression of cancer was not observed in 157 patients, among whom, 66% were treated conventionally and 79% with accelerated fractionation method. 60 cases of loco-regional recurrences were noted, among which 55 were regional. The majority of failure cases was observed until the 30(th) of the month after the radiotherapy ended. In conventional fractionation treatment, recurrences in T1 were 8/31 (26%), in T2 22/59 (37%) and in T3 8/20 (40%). In patients treated with AF, recurrences were T1 5/39 (13%), T2 15/55 (27%) and T3 2/13 (15%) respectively. The percentage of primary site tumour recurrences for each localization and kind of treatment was analysed. In CF 28/78 (37%) of glottic tumour recurrences and 10/34 (29%) of supraglottic tumour, recurrences were observed. In AF, 12/71 (17%) and 10/36 (28%) were observed respectively. In 48 cases salvage surgery was used, and 12 patients were not qualified because of tumour massive progression or because they refused to have a surgery. Among 34 cases (16%) of the second primary tumour or distant methastases, 25 were observed with glottic cancer, among which 23 were observed in early stages, and 9 cases with supraglottic cancer, among which, 6 showed early stage of tumour. In only 3 cases out of all the patients, distant methastases were confirmed in histopatology examination. The main cause of failure in larynx cancer patients in stage T1 is that 3N0M0 are local recurrences. Second primary or distant methastases constitute 16% of the patients in this paper.
Collapse
|
49
|
Bentzen S, Yarnold J. A Toast to the Silver Anniversary of Clinical Oncology: A Quarter of a Century of Advances in Evidence-based Radiation Dose Fractionation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2014; 26:599-601. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/07/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
50
|
Lipman D, Verhoef LC, Takes RP, Kaanders JH, Janssens GO. Outcome and toxicity profile after brachytherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. Head Neck 2014; 37:1297-303. [PMID: 24838690 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 03/17/2014] [Accepted: 05/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcome and toxicity profile after primary brachytherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted for patients with Wang classification T1 to 2 cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule who received primary treatment with brachytherapy between 1992 and 2010. Tumor control, acute skin, mucosal, and late cartilage toxicity were scored. RESULTS Of 60 patients (T1, 50; T2, 10), 38 were treated with an interstitial implant and 22 by a mold technique. The 3-year local, regional, and locoregional control rates were 91%, 93%, and 84%, respectively. Tumor diameter <1.5 cm resulted in a better local (p = .02) and regional (p = .05) control. The cumulative incidence of moist skin desquamation and confluent mucositis was 64% and 82%, respectively. The actuarial incidence of chondritis and/or chondronecrosis was 19%. CONCLUSION Primary brachytherapy for Wang T1 to 2 squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal vestibule offers excellent tumor control rates with acceptable toxicity and preservation of anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Djoeri Lipman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lia C Verhoef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert P Takes
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes H Kaanders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Geert O Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|