Prognostic significance of diabetes mellitus in patients with acute myocardial infarction after recanalization

A systematic review and meta-regression of temporal trends in the excess mortality associated with diabetes mellitus after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

It is not well known whether the gap in outcomes after myocardial infarction (MI) between patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) has changed over time. We performed a systematic review and metaregression of temporal trends in the excess mortality associated with DM after MI.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed database for studies reporting mortality data according to diabetic status in patients hospitalized for MI or acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We included 139 studies/cohorts for analysis (432,066 diabetic patients and 1,182,108 nondiabetic patients).

RESULTS

When compared to their non-diabetic counterparts, patients with DM had an odds ratio (OR) [95% CI] of 1.66 [1.59-1.74] (P<0.0001) for early mortality, and of 1.86 [1.75-1.97] (P<0.0001) for 6-12months mortality. When all data from the 116 studies reporting early mortality were pooled, there was no significant relationship between calendar year and Log (OR). Likewise, when considering the 61 studies reporting 6-12months mortality, there was no significant relationship between calendar year and Log (OR). Similar to the overall pooled analysis, no significant relationship between inclusion year and Log (OR) for mortality in diabetic patients was observed in sensitivity analyses performed in studies with ST-elevation MI as inclusion criteria, in randomized trials, in studies including >2000 patients, and in studies with DM prevalence >20%.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence for temporal changes in the incremental mortality risk associated with DM in the setting of MI. The improvements in management of MI patients during the last decades have not been associated with a reduction of the gap between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Nuclear Cardiology: Present and Future

Nuclear cardiology has made significant advances since the first reports of planar scintigraphy for the evaluation of left ventricular perfusion and function. While the current "state of the art" of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging offers invaluable diagnostic and prognostic information for the evaluation of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD), advances in the cellular and molecular biology of the cardiovascular system have helped to usher in a new modality in nuclear cardiology, namely, molecular imaging. In this review, we will discuss the current state of the art in nuclear cardiology, which includes SPECT and positron emission tomographic evaluation of myocardial perfusion, evaluation of left ventricular function by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT and gated blood pool SPECT, and the evaluation of myocardial viability with PET and SPECT methods. In addition, we will discuss the future of nuclear cardiology and the role that molecular imaging will play in the early detection of CAD at the level of the vulnerable plaque, the evaluation of cardiac remodeling, and monitoring of important new therapies including gene therapy and stem cell therapy.

Primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: influence of diabetes mellitus in angiographic results and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

The outcome of patients with diabetes after myocardial infarction (MI) has traditionally been worse than in their nondiabetic counterparts before and during the thrombolytic therapy era. Whether the fate of patients with diabetes might improve with mechanical intervention, particularly with primary stenting, has not previously been studied.

METHODS

We compared the angiographic and clinical outcome of 76 nondiabetic patients (aged 61 +/- 14 years; 66% male) and 28 patients with diabetes (aged 65 +/- 12 years; 64% male) consecutively treated with primary stenting for acute MI. Coronary Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction grade 3 flow was restored in 96% of diabetic and 97% of nondiabetic patients.

RESULTS

Angiographic results after stent deployment were similar in the 2 groups. At 1-month follow-up, all patients in both groups were alive. Patients with diabetes had a much higher incidence of stent thrombosis (18% vs 1%; P =.003), which accounted for the majority of the major cardiac events at 1 month (21% vs 4%; P =.009). At a mean follow-up of 315 +/- 13 days, 99% of nondiabetic and 89% of patients with diabetes were alive (P =.04). Overall freedom from a major cardiac event (death, MI, target vessel revascularization) at 315 +/- 13 day follow-up was 88% for nondiabetics and 54% for patients with diabetes (P =.0003). By multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus was the most important predictor for development of 1-month (RR 9.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-30) and late major cardiovascular events (RR 8.39; 95% confidence interval, 2.93-24).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary stenting in acute MI is highly effective in restoring immediate TIMI 3 coronary flow in nondiabetic patients and patients with diabetes. This procedure may improve benefit in terms of mortality rate to both groups, particularly in patients with diabetes, compared with previous reports with thrombolytic therapy. Nevertheless, stent thrombosis and major cardiovascular events at 1 month and late follow-up are more frequent in patients with diabetes.