Effect of gemfibrozil on serum levels of prostacyclin and precursor fatty acids in hyperlipidemic patients with Type 2 diabetes

Treatment With Gemfibrozil Prevents the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Obese Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats

Recently, we reported that Dahl salt-sensitive leptin receptor mutant (SS^LepRmutant) rats exhibit dyslipidemia and renal lipid accumulation independent of hyperglycemia that progresses to chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, in the current study, we examined the effects of gemfibrozil, a lipid-lowering drug (200 mg/kg/day, orally), on the progression of renal injury in SS and SS^LepRmutant rats for 4 weeks starting at 12 weeks of age. Plasma triglyceride levels were markedly elevated in the SS^LepRmutant strain compared to SS rats (1193 ± 243 and 98 ± 16 mg/day, respectively). Gemfibrozil treatment only reduced plasma triglycerides in the SS^LepRmutant strain (410 ± 79 mg/dL). MAP was significantly higher in the SS^LepRmutant strain vs. SS rats at the end of the study (198 ± 7 vs. 165 ± 7 mmHg, respectively). Administration of gemfibrozil only lowered MAP in SS^LepRmutant rats (163 ± 8 mmHg). During the course of the study, proteinuria increased to 125 ± 22 mg/day in SS rats. However, proteinuria did not change in the SS^LepRmutant strain and remained near baseline (693 ± 58 mg/day). Interestingly, treatment with gemfibrozil increased the progression of proteinuria by 77% in the SS^LepRmutant strain without affecting proteinuria in SS rats. The renal injury in the SS^LepRmutant strain progressed to CKD. Moreover, the kidneys from SS^LepRmutant rats displayed significant glomerular injury with mesangial expansion and increased renal lipid accumulation and fibrosis compared to SS rats. Treatment with gemfibrozil significantly reduced glomerular injury and lipid accumulation and improved renal function. These data indicate that reducing plasma triglyceride levels with gemfibrozil inhibits hypertension and CKD associated with obesity in SS^LepRmutant rats.

Obesity, metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: prevention and treatment

The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in dialysis patients is high and further increases after transplantation due to weight gain and the detrimental metabolic effects of immunosuppressive drugs. Corticosteroids cause insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, abnormal glucose metabolism and arterial hypertension. The calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus is diabetogenic by inhibiting insulin secretion, whereas cyclosporine causes hypertension and increases cholesterol levels. Mtor antagonists are responsible for hyperlipidemia and abnormal glucose metabolism by mechanisms that also implicate insulin resistance. The metabolic syndrome in transplant recipients has numerous detrimental effects such as increasing the risk of new onset diabetes, cardiovascular disease events and patient death. In addition, it has also been linked with accelerated loss of graft function, proteinuria and ultimately graft loss. Prevention and management of the metabolic syndrome are based on increasing physical activity, promotion of weight loss and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Bariatric surgery before or after renal transplantation in patients with body mass index >35 kg/m(2) is an option but its long term effects on graft and patient survival have not been investigated. Steroid withdrawal and replacement of tacrolimus with cyclosporine facilitate control of diabetes, whereas replacement of cyclosporine and mtor antagonists can improve hyperlipidemia. The new costimulation inhibitor belatacept has potent immunosuppressive properties without metabolic adverse effects and will be an important component of immunosuppressive regimens with better metabolic risk profile. Medical treatment of cardiovascular risk factors has to take potential drug interactions with immunosuppressive medication and drug accumulation due to renal insufficiency into account.

PPARalpha: an emerging therapeutic target in diabetic microvascular damage

The global pandemic of diabetes mellitus portends an alarming rise in the prevalence of microvascular complications, despite advanced therapies for hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) is expressed in organs affected by diabetic microvascular disease (retina, kidney and nerves), and its expression is regulated specifically in these tissues. Experimental evidence suggests that PPARalpha activation attenuates or inhibits several mediators of vascular damage, including lipotoxicity, inflammation, reactive oxygen species generation, endothelial dysfunction, angiogenesis and thrombosis, and thus might influence intracellular signaling pathways that lead to microvascular complications. PPARalpha has emerged as a novel target to prevent microvascular disease, via both its lipid-related and lipid-unrelated actions. Despite strong experimental evidence of the potential benefits of PPARalpha agonists in the prevention of vascular damage, the evidence from clinical studies in patients with diabetes mellitus remains limited. Promising findings from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study on microvascular outcomes are countered by elevations in participants' homocysteine and creatinine levels that might potentially attenuate the benefits of PPARalpha activation. This Review focuses on the role of PPARalpha activation in diabetic microvascular disease and highlights the available experimental and clinical evidence from studies of PPARalpha agonists.

Fenofibrate: a novel formulation (Triglide) in the treatment of lipid disorders: a review

Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of mortality worldwide and accounts for approximately 40% of all deaths. Dyslipidemia is one of the primary causes of atherosclerosis and effective interventions to correct dyslipidemia should form an integral component of any strategy aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease. Fibrates have played a major role in the treatment of hyperlipidemia for more than two decades. Fenofibrate is one of the most commonly used fibrates worldwide. Since fenofibrate was first introduced in clinical practice, a major drawback has been its low bioavailability when taken under fasting conditions. Insoluble Drug Delivery-Microparticle fenofibrate is a new formulation that has an equivalent extent of absorption under fed or fasting conditions. In this review, we will discuss the clinical pharmacology of fenofibrate, with particular emphasis on this novel formulation, as well as its lipid-modulating and pleiotropic actions. We will also analyze the major trial that evaluated fibrates for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease, the safety and efficacy profile of fibrate-statin combination treatment, and the current recommendations regarding the use of fibrates in clinical practice.

Fenofibrate-induced hyperhomocysteinaemia: clinical implications and management

Fenofibrate is among the drugs of choice for treatment of hypertriglyceridaemia and low levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, both recognised as risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Recently, a number of studies have shown an elevation of homocysteine levels with fenofibrate or bezafibrate therapy. Homocysteine is an atherogenic amino acid derived from the methionine cycle. At present, the underlying mechanism for this elevation has not been elucidated. While deterioration of vitamin status does not seem to be involved, impairment of renal function or changes in creatine metabolism are regarded as probable mechanisms. In patients not receiving lipid-lowering drugs, vitamin supplementation with folic acid and vitamin B12 effectively reduces the plasma homocysteine level. Two studies have shown that addition of folic acid or a vitamin combination to fenofibrate prevented most of the homocysteine increase associated with fenofibrate. Although the consequence of increasing homocysteine levels for cardiovascular risk has not been proven at present, it has to be considered that fenofibrate will be given for long-term treatment. Therefore, addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 to fenofibrate can be recommended to prevent the increase of homocysteine associated with fenofibrate, or treatment could be changed to gemfibrozil, which does not increase plasma homocysteine levels.

Effects of fibrates on serum metabolic parameters

Fibric acid derivatives are a class of hypolipidaemic drugs used in the treatment of patients with hypertriglyceridaemia, mixed hyperlipidaemia and diabetic dyslipidaemia. Fibrate therapy results in a significant decrease in serum triglycerides and an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels. The latest drugs of this class are also effective in lowering low-density (LDL) cholesterol levels and can change the distribution of LDL towards higher and larger particles. The effects of fibrates on lipid metabolism are mostly mediated through the activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARalpha). A number of angiographic and clinical trials have confirmed that fibrates can slow the progression of atherosclerotic disease and decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Recently published data suggest that the ability of fibrates to prevent atherosclerosis is not related only to their hypolipidaemic effects but also to other 'pleiotropic effects', such as their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and antithrombotic effects, as well as their ability to improve endothelial function. Interestingly, fibrates may favourably influence the thrombotic/fibrinolytic system. In fact, most of these drugs can significantly decrease plasma fibrinogen levels and inhibit tissue factor expression and activity in human monocytes and macrophages. Some studies have shown that fibrates can improve carbohydrate metabolism in patients with dyslipidaemia, including diabetic patients. Among fibrates only fenofibrate can significantly decrease serum uric acid levels by increasing renal urate excretion. Fibrates, with the possible exception of gemfibrozil, can significantly increase serum creatinine and homocysteine levels. Finally, a reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase and gamma glutamyltranspeptidase (gammaGT) activity is a well-documented effect of therapy with fibrates. The fibrates are generally well-tolerated drugs with few side-effects. The most important side-effect is myositis, which is observed in patients with impaired renal function or when statins are given concomitantly.

Effects of fenofibrate and gemfibrozil on plasma homocysteine

Fenofibrate increases plasma homocysteine. Because the concentration of plasma homocysteine depends on renal function, we postulate that increases in plasma homocysteine are a result of the known impairment of renal function caused by fenofibrate. Gemfibrozil, another fibrate, does not affect renal function. In a crossover study we tested whether gemfibrozil would raise homocysteine. 22 patients who had hypertriglyceridaemia were given 900 mg gemfibrozil or 200 mg fenofibrate daily for 6 weeks. Lipids were altered similarly, but homocysteine, creatinine, and cystatin C were raised by fenofibrate but not by gemfibrozil (p for differences between treatment effects: 0.007, 0.006, and 0.040, respectively). We propose gemfibrozil should be the fibrate of choice.

Fibrate-induced increase in blood urea and creatinine: is gemfibrozil the only innocuous agent?

BACKGROUND

Some reports indicate that fibrates can induce renal dysfunction. However, the clinical characteristics of these episodes, and the respective nephrotoxicity of the four main fibrates used-namely, fenofibrate, bezafibrate, ciprofibrate, and gemfibrozil-remain ill defined.

METHODS

To better characterize this side-effect, we first reviewed the charts of 27 patients from our institution who developed an impairment of renal function during fibrate therapy. We next analysed the articles (n=24) that contained data on renal function in patients taking fibrates (n=2676).

RESULTS

Among our 27 patients, 25 were on fenofibrate therapy, one was taking bezafibrate, and one ciprofibrate. Nineteen were recipients of solid-organ transplants (kidney recipients, n=15; heart or heart-lung recipients, n=4), and eight were non-transplanted patients with some impairment of renal function. Baseline plasma creatinine ranged from 0.9 to 2.9 mg/dl. It increased by a mean of 40% after the start of fibrate therapy. There was a concomitant increase of blood urea values (mean 36%) in most of the patients. Renal function returned to baseline in 18/24 patients after fibrate discontinuation. However, six patients, all transplant recipients, experienced a permanent increase in plasma creatinine. The incidence of fibrate-induced renal dysfunction among our series of kidney transplant recipients was 60%, as it occurred in 15 of the 25 patients who had ever taken fibrates. An increase of mean creatinine values during therapy was described in all papers on fenofibrate (n=7) and bezafibrate (n=8) (range 8-18% and 8-40% respectively), and in three of four papers dealing with ciprofibrate (range 6-16%). No significant renal impairment was described in any of the eight articles reporting data on gemfibrozil therapy.

CONCLUSION

Therapy with fenofibrate, bezafibrate, and ciprofibrate may induce renal dysfunction. Gemfibrozil appears to be devoid of this side-effect.