Worldwide experience with the CR326F-derived inactivated hepatitis A virus vaccine in pediatric and adult populations: an overview

Establishment of a Highly Sensitive Assay for Detection of Hepatitis E Virus-Specific Immunoglobulins

Hepatitis E, a liver disease caused by infection with the hepatitis E virus (HEV), is a worldwide emerging disease. The diagnosis is based on the detection of viral RNA and of HEV-specific immunoglobulins (Ig). For the latter, various assays are commercially available but still lack harmonization. In this study, a Luminex-based multiplex serological assay was established that measures the presence of total IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies, targeting a short peptide derived from the viral E2 protein. For the validation, 160 serum samples with a known HEV serostatus were used to determine the assay cutoff and accuracy. Thereby, HEV IgG- and RNA-positive sera were identified with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94% to 100%). Application of the assay by retesting 514 serum samples previously characterized with different HEV-IgG or total antibody tests revealed a high level of agreement between the assays (Cohen's kappa, 0.58 to 0.99). The established method is highly sensitive and specific and can be easily implemented in a multiplex format to facilitate rapid differential diagnostics with a few microliters of sample input.

Hepatitis A vaccine immunogenicity in patients using immunosuppressive drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Inactivated hepatitis A (HepA) vaccines are very immunogenic in healthy individuals; however, it remains unclear how different immunosuppressive regimens affect HepA vaccine immunogenicity. Our objective was to summarise the current evidence on immunogenicity of HepA vaccination in patients using immunosuppressive drugs.

METHODS

We systematically searched the literature for studies on immunogenicity of inactivated HepA vaccines in adults using immunosuppressive drugs. Studies reporting seroconversion rates (SCR) 4-8 weeks after 1 and 2 doses of HepA vaccine in organ transplant recipients and patients with chronic inflammatory conditions were included in a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 17 studies, comprising 1,332 individuals. In healthy controls (2 studies), SCRs were 90-94% after the first dose and 100% after the second dose. In organ transplant recipients, SCRs ranged from 0 to 67% after the first dose of vaccine and 0-97% after the second dose. In patients with chronic inflammatory conditions, SCRs ranged from 6% to 100% after the first dose and from 48 to 100% after the second dose of vaccine. Patients using a TNF-alpha inhibitor versus conventional immune-modulators (e.g. methotrexate, azathioprine, corticosteroids) were more likely to seroconvert after the first dose of vaccine (OR12.1 [2.14-68.2]) but not after the second dose of vaccine (OR 0.78 [0.21-2.92]) in a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

Studies evaluating HepA vaccine immunogenicity in immunosuppressive agents are heterogeneous. Overall, there is an impaired immune response following HepA vaccination in patients using immunosuppressive drugs, especially after only one dose of vaccine and in organ transplant recipients. HepA vaccination should therefore be considered before immunosuppressive therapy. Future research should focus on alternative vaccination regimens and long-term immunogenicity.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42018102607.

Serum biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Chronic liver disease due to viral hepatitis continues to be a major global health concern. Timely diagnosis and treatment will prevent cirrhosis, risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and requirement for liver transplantation. Numerous serum biomarkers are available for viral hepatitis that are helpful in diagnosis, measuring severity, progression of disease, evaluating the best therapeutic options, and monitoring antiviral treatment response. Determining the clinical use of available diagnostic tests can be challenging for the health care provider. Areas covered: This review article attempts to summarize the established and emerging serological markers for diagnosis and managing viral hepatitis. The literature search was performed in February 2018 and included MEDLINE and Embase databases for recent relevant literature on biomarkers for viral hepatitis. Expert Commentary: Despite the discovery of several candidate biomarkers, translating these to clinical practice in viral hepatitis and HCC remains challenging. While limited availability of the new biomarkers in prevalent geographic areas and significant cost remain major obstacles, there have been exciting developments in this field. Understanding the detection limits and sensitivity of these markers and translating them into clinical use is important in management of viral hepatitis and complications of liver disease such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer.

Immune memory at 17-years of follow-up of a single dose of live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine

BACKGROUND

In recent years, hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection has declined considerably in China, associated with wide deployment of HAV vaccines and improvement in socio-economic indicators. Towards the elimination of HA in the country, we assessed the duration and characteristics of immunity conferred by the widely used, locally manufactured HAV vaccine.

METHODS

This is a longitudinal cohort study that followed recipients of a live attenuated HAV vaccine 17 years after the initial administration. Blood samples were collected from participants pre- and two-week post-booster HAV vaccine dose. Serum anti-HAV antibody was measured by ELISA method. Memory B and T cells were determined by ELISPOT and Flow Cytometry assays, respectively.

RESULTS

A robust anamnestic response was observed two-week post-challenge. Both HAV-specific memory B cell and T cells remained, and responded quickly when re-encountering HAV. The magnitude of recall responses was present, regardless of the status of the serum anti-HAV antibody pre-booster.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated long-term immunity from the live attenuated HAV vaccine, including antibody persistence and immunological memory. Considering the conditions that make elimination of infectious diseases feasible, following polio, hepatitis A could be targeted for elimination in China.

Complex immune correlates of protection in HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trials

Development of an efficacious HIV-1 vaccine is a major priority for improving human health worldwide. Vaccine-mediated protection against human pathogens can be achieved through elicitation of protective innate, humoral, and cellular responses. Identification of specific immune responses responsible for pathogen protection enables vaccine development and provides insights into host defenses against pathogens and the immunological mechanisms that most effectively fight infection. Defining immunological correlates of transmission risk in preclinical and clinical HIV-1 vaccine trials has moved the HIV-1 vaccine development field forward and directed new candidate vaccine development. Immune correlate studies are providing novel hypotheses about immunological mechanisms that may be responsible for preventing HIV-1 acquisition. Recent results from HIV-1 immune correlates work has demonstrated that there are multiple types of immune responses that together, comprise an immune correlate-thus implicating polyfunctional immune control of HIV-1 transmission. An in depth understanding of these complex immunological mechanisms of protection against HIV-1 will accelerate the development of an efficacious HIV-1 vaccine.

Vaccination to gain humoral immune memory

The concept of immune memory forms the biological basis for vaccination programs. Despite advancements in the field of immune memory and vaccination, most current vaccines are evaluated by magnitude of antigen-specific antibody titers in serum or mucosa after vaccination. It has been shown, however, that antibody-mediated humoral immune memory is established regardless of the magnitude and duration of immune reactions, suggesting that assessment of vaccine efficacy should be performed for several years after vaccination. This long-term investigation is disadvantageous for prevalent and pandemic infections. Long-lived memory plasma cells and memory helper T cells which contribute to humoral immune memory are generated in the bone marrow after migration of memory cell precursors through bloodstream. Thus, it may be a novel evaluation strategy to assess the precursors of memory cells in the blood in the early phase of the immune reaction(s). We here review recent advances on the generation and maintenance of immune memory cells involved in humoral immunity and introduce a current concept of direct and short-term assessment of humoral immune memory formation upon vaccination as a correlate of protection.

Risk factors and pre-travel healthcare of international travellers attending a Dutch travel clinic: a cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND

The number of international travellers is currently estimated to exceed one billion annually. To address travel related health risks and facilitate risk reduction strategies, detailed knowledge of travellers' characteristics is important.

METHOD

In this cross-sectional study, data of a 20% sample of travellers visiting the Academic Medical Center (AMC) travel clinic Amsterdam from July 2011 to July 2012 was collected. Itineraries and protection versus exposure rates of preventable infectious diseases were mapped and reported according to STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

1749 travellers were included. South-Eastern Asia, South-America and West-Africa were most frequently visited. 26.2% of the population had pre-existing medical conditions (often cardiovascular). Young and VFR travellers had a longer median travel time (28 and 30 days) compared to the overall population (21 days). Young adult travellers were relatively often vaccinated against hepatitis B (43.9% vs. 20.5%, p < .001) and rabies (16.6% vs. 4.3%, p < .001). VFRs were less often vaccinated against hepatitis B (11.6% vs. 30.6%, p < .001) and rabies (1.3% vs. 9.0%, p .012) compared to non-VFR travellers.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-travel guidelines were well adhered to. Young adult travellers had high-risk itineraries but were adequately protected. Improvement of hepatitis B and rabies protection would be desirable, specifically for VFRs.

Live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines developed in China

Two live, attenuated hepatitis A vaccines, H 2 and LA-1 virus strains, were developed through serial passages of the viruses in cell cultures at 32 °C and 35 °C respectively. Both vaccines were safe and immunogenic, providing protection against clinical hepatitis A in 95% of the vaccinees, with a single dose by subcutaneous injection. The vaccine recipients were not protected from asymptomatic, subclinical hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection, which induced a similar antibody response as for unvaccinated subjects. A second dose caused anamnestic response and can be used for boosting. Oral immunization of human with H 2 vaccine or of marmoset with LA-1 vaccine failed, and no evidence was found for person-to-person transmission of the H 2 strain or for marmoset-to-marmoset transmission of LA-1 strain, by close contact. H 2 strain was genetically stable when passaged in marmosets, humans or cell cultures at 37 °C; 3 consecutive passages of the virus in marmosets did not cause virulence mutation. The live vaccines offer the benefits of low cost, single dose injection, long- term protection, and increased duration of immunity through subclinical infection. Improved sanitation and administration of 150 million doses of the live vaccines to children had led to a 90% reduction in the annual national incidence rate of hepatitis A in China during the 16-year period, from 1991 to 2006. Hepatitis A immunization with both live and inactivated HA vaccines was implemented in the national routine childhood immunization program in 2008 and around 92% of the 16 million annual births received the affordable live, attenuated vaccines at 18 months of age. Near elimination of the disease was achieved in China for 14 years following introduction of the H 2 live vaccine into the Expanded Immunization Program (EPI) in 1992.

Persistence of hepatitis A vaccine induced seropositivity in infants and young children by maternal antibody status: 10-year follow-up

Persistence of seropositivity conferred by hepatitis A vaccine administered to children <2 years of age is unknown and passively transferred maternal antibodies to hepatitis A virus (maternal anti-HAV) may lower the infant's immune response to the vaccine. One hundred ninety-seven infants and young children were randomized into three groups to receive a two-dose hepatitis A vaccine: group 1 at 6 and 12 months, group 2 at 12 and 18 months, and group 3 at 15 and 21 months of age. Within each group, infants were randomized by maternal anti-HAV status. Anti-HAV levels were measured at 1 and 6 months and at 3, 5, 7, and 10 years after the second dose of hepatitis A vaccination. Children in all groups had evidence of seroprotection (>10 mIU/mL) at 1 month after the second dose. At 10 years, all children retained seroprotective anti-HAV levels except for only 7% and 11% of children in group 1 born to anti-HAV-negative and anti-HAV-positive mothers, respectively, and 4% of group 3 children born to anti-HAV-negative mothers. At 10 years, children born to anti-HAV-negative mothers in group 3 had the highest geometric mean concentration (GMC) (97 mIU/mL; 95% confidence interval, 71-133 mIU/mL) and children born to anti-HAV-positive mothers in group 1 had the lowest GMC (29 mIU/mL; 95% confidence interval, 20-40 mIU/mL). Anti-HAV levels through 10 years of age correlated with initial peak anti-HAV levels (tested at 1 month after the second dose).

CONCLUSION

The seropositivity induced by hepatitis A vaccine given to children <2 years of age persists for at least 10 years regardless of presence of maternal anti-HAV.

Immune markers and correlates of protection for vaccine induced immune responses

Vaccines have been a major innovation in the history of mankind and still have the potential to address the challenges posed by chronic intracellular infections including tuberculosis, HIV and malaria which are leading causes of high morbidity and mortality across the world. Markers of an appropriate humoral response currently remain the best validated correlates of protective immunity after vaccination. Despite advancements in the field of immunology over the past few decades currently there are, however, no sufficiently validated immune correlates of vaccine induced protection against chronic infections in neither human nor veterinary medicine. Technological and conceptual advancements within cell-mediated immunology have led to a number of new immunological read-outs with the potential to emerge as correlates of vaccine induced protection. For T(H)1 type responses, antigen-specific production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) has been promoted as a quantitative marker of protective cell-mediated immune responses over the past couple of decades. More recently, however, evidence from several infections has pointed towards the quality of the immune response, measured through increased levels of antigen-specific polyfunctional T cells capable of producing a triad of relevant cytokines, as a better correlate of sustained protective immunity against this type of infections. Also the possibilities to measure antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTL) during infection or in response to vaccination, through recombinant major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I tetramers loaded with relevant peptides, has opened a new vista to include CTL responses in the evaluation of protective immune responses. Here, we review different immune markers and new candidates for correlates of a protective vaccine induced immune response against chronic infections and how successful they have been in defining the protective immunity in human and veterinary medicine.

Successful memory response following a booster dose with a virosome-formulated hepatitis a vaccine delayed up to 11 years

Boosting adult travelers with the virosome-formulated, aluminum-free hepatitis A vaccine Epaxal up to 128 months after a single primary dose confers full protection against hepatitis A, even in travelers aged 50 years and above. Delaying the booster dose did not influence the immune memory response to Epaxal.

Contributions of humoral and cellular immunity to vaccine-induced protection in humans

Vaccines play a vital role in protecting the host against infectious disease. The most effective licensed vaccines elicit long-term antigen-specific antibody responses by plasma cells in addition to the development of persisting T cell and B cell memory. The relative contributions of these different immune cell subsets are context-dependent and vary depending on the attributes of the vaccine (i.e., live/attenuated, inactivated, and subunit) as well as the biology of the pathogen in question. For relatively simple vaccines against bacterial antigens (e.g., tetanus toxin) or invariant viruses, the immunological correlates of protection are well-characterized. For more complex vaccines against viruses, especially those that mutate or cause latent infections, it is more difficult to define the specific correlates of immunity. This often requires observational/natural history studies, clinical trials, or experimental evaluation in relevant animal models in order for immunological correlates to be determined or extrapolated. In this review, we will discuss the relative contributions of virus-specific T cell and B cell responses to vaccine-mediated protection against disease.

Correlates of protection induced by vaccination

This paper attempts to summarize current knowledge about immune responses to vaccines that correlate with protection. Although the immune system is redundant, almost all current vaccines work through antibodies in serum or on mucosa that block infection or bacteremia/viremia and thus provide a correlate of protection. The functional characteristics of antibodies, as well as quantity, are important. Antibody may be highly correlated with protection or synergistic with other functions. Immune memory is a critical correlate: effector memory for short-incubation diseases and central memory for long-incubation diseases. Cellular immunity acts to kill or suppress intracellular pathogens and may also synergize with antibody. For some vaccines, we have no true correlates, but only useful surrogates, for an unknown protective response.

Hepatitis A vaccines and the elderly

Hepatitis A virus (HAV) exposure in unprotected adults may cause severe and serious symptoms, with risk of both morbidity and mortality increasing with age. As seroprevalence of HAV is low in industrialised countries, and an increasing number of people, with an increasing median age, travel from areas of low HAV endemicity to high endemicity, pre-travel vaccination is warranted. Vaccination of the elderly against HAV, however, may be associated with reduced seroprotection, since the immune response decreases with age. Studies with monovalent hepatitis A vaccine or combined hepatitis A and B vaccine show good efficacy in adults in general. Few studies have assessed the immune response in older adults. The only prospective study with monovalent hepatitis A vaccine in the elderly showed a reduced seroprotection of approximately 65% after a single primary dose in subjects over the age of 50 years, while seroprotection was 98% in this age group after receiving a booster dose. The only prospective study with combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in younger subjects or older than 40 years showed similar seroprotection (99-100%) against HAV compared to a monovalent vaccine after receiving three doses. As data on seroprotection for HAV in the elderly are limited, further studies are needed to elucidate how optimal protection in the elderly can be achieved. In the mean time, based on the available data, the suggestion is made to screen elderly travellers to areas endemic for HAV for the presence of naturally acquired immunity, and, if found susceptible, be immunised well in advance of their trip, to allow time for post-vaccination antibody testing and/or administration of a second dose of the vaccine.

Prevention of hepatitis A by Havrix: a review

Hepatitis A is one of the most common vaccine-preventable infectious diseases in the world. With at least 1.5 million cases of hepatitis A worldwide each year, disease management constitutes a substantial economic burden. The first effective vaccine against hepatitis A, Havrix was introduced in 1992. This review summarizes data accumulated following more than a decade of clinical experience with this vaccine and compares clinical data with other currently available hepatitis A vaccines. Based on this data and on the current immunological knowledge, a recent consensus concluded that hepatitis A vaccines induce lifelong protection, and thus booster vaccinations against hepatitis A are unnecessary in fully immunized, healthy people. In view of this, current regulatory recommendations for the use of hepatitis A vaccines are reviewed and possible future strategies identified.

Immunogenicity and safety of a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine (Epaxal) in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Protection against hepatitis A virus (HAV) in the elderly is becoming more important as more senior travelers visit areas of high HAV endemicity, and less have protective antibodies acquired after natural infection during childhood. This study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of hepatitis A vaccine in elderly compared to young adults.

METHODS

In this open, uncontrolled study, subjects of 18 to 45 years or < or = 50 years of age received two doses of aluminum-free, virosomal HAV vaccine, Epaxal (Berna Biotech Ltd, formerly Swiss Serum and Vaccine Institute, Bern, Switzerland) 12 months apart.

RESULTS

After both the basic and the booster doses, geometric mean titers (GMT) for anti-HAV antibodies were 1.7-fold higher in subjects younger than 45 years compared with those < or = 50 years of age. The proportional increase in GMT after the booster dose, however, was similar in younger and older subjects. Seroprotection (< or = 20 mIU/mL) rates in the younger and older subjects were 100 and 65%, respectively, after the first vaccination and 100 and 97%, respectively, after the booster dose. Systemic and local adverse events were mainly mild and short-lived.

CONCLUSION

These data show that HAV virosomal vaccine (Epaxal) is well tolerated and immunogenic in elderly subjects. The clinical relevance of lower seroconversion rates after the primary dose is unknown in this population of travelers.

Diagnosis of hepatitis a virus infection: a molecular approach

Current serologic tests provide the foundation for diagnosis of hepatitis A and hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection. Recent advances in methods to identify and characterize nucleic acid markers of viral infections have provided the foundation for the field of molecular epidemiology and increased our knowledge of the molecular biology and epidemiology of HAV. Although HAV is primarily shed in feces, there is a strong viremic phase during infection which has allowed easy access to virus isolates and the use of molecular markers to determine their genetic relatedness. Molecular epidemiologic studies have provided new information on the types and extent of HAV infection and transmission in the United States. In addition, these new diagnostic methods have provided tools for the rapid detection of food-borne HAV transmission and identification of the potential source of the food contamination.

Experience with hepatitis A and B vaccines

The lengthy history of efforts to understand the pathogenesis and means of preventing and controlling both hepatitis A and B is noteworthy for many exceptional scientific achievements. Among these are the development of vaccines to prevent the spread of infection through induction of active immunity to hepatitis A virus (HAV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). The first plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine was licensed in the United States in 1981 and was replaced by recombinant hepatitis B vaccines in 1986 and 1989. Vaccines to prevent HAV infection were licensed in the United States in 1995 and 1996. Subsequently, combination vaccines that included both hepatitis A and B vaccine components, or the hepatitis B component in combination with other commonly administered vaccines, were licensed in the United States. Despite significant reductions in hepatitis-related morbidity and mortality that have resulted from widespread use of these vaccines, vaccine-preventable morbidity and mortality still occur. The purposes of this article are to review clinical trial and other experience with hepatitis A and B vaccines in healthy individuals as well as in those with chronic liver disease, infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, or requiring hemodialysis; describe the impact that these vaccines and national recommendations for vaccination have had on reducing the incidence of HAV and HBV infection; and recommend expansion of these recommendations to include universal vaccination of adults as a means of further reducing the burden of viral hepatitis.

Efficacy of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in HIV-infected patients: a hierarchical bayesian meta-analysis

Patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV) have elevated risk for hepatitis A virus (HAV) coinfection. Sequelae from coinfection include increased risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality. This study synthesizes the results of trials measuring response to HAV vaccine in HIV-infected patients using Bayesian meta-analysis methodologies. PubMed, OhioLINK/Medline, and other sources were used to search for studies analyzing response to HAV vaccine in HIV-infected patients. Studies were evaluated for quality. A Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model was used to estimate overall response to vaccine. Between-study variance was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the potential for bias. The literature search yielded eight studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis, with a combined total of 458 patients. Observed proportions of response in individual studies ranged from 50 to 95%. The intention-to-treat meta-analysis estimated a combined proportion of HIV+ patients responding to vaccine of 64% (95% CI 52-75%). Heterogeneity between studies was significant. The overall response rate to HAV vaccine in HIV-infected patients is lower than typically cited. Up to 1/2 of HIV-infected patients may be nonresponders. Future research will be required to better understand the correlates of response.

A review of licensed viral vaccines, some of their safety concerns, and the advances in the development of investigational viral vaccines

Viral vaccines could be considered among the most important medical achievements of the 20th century. They have prevented much suffering and saved many lives. Although some curative antiviral drugs exist, we desperately depend on efforts by academic, governmental and industrial scientists in the advancement of viral vaccines in the prevention and control of infectious diseases. In the next decade, we hope to see advancement in the development of current and investigational viral vaccines against childhood and adult infections. In this article, we will review the licensed viral vaccines, some of their safety concerns, and the advances in the development of investigational viral vaccines.

Vaccines and immunotherapies for the prevention of infectious diseases having cutaneous manifestations

Although the development of antimicrobial drugs has advanced rapidly in the past several years, such agents act against only certain groups of microbes and are associated with increasing rates of resistance. These limitations of treatment force physicians to continue to rely on prevention, which is more effective and cost-effective than therapy. From the use of the smallpox vaccine by Jenner in the 1700s to the current concerns about biologic warfare, the technology for vaccine development has seen numerous advances. The currently available vaccines for viral illnesses include Dryvax for smallpox; the combination measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine; inactivated vaccine for hepatitis A; plasma-derived vaccine for hepatitis B; and the live attenuated Oka strain vaccine for varicella zoster. Vaccines available against bacterial illnesses include those for anthrax, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis. Currently in development for both prophylactic and therapeutic purposes are vaccines for HIV, herpes simplex virus, and human papillomavirus. Other vaccines being investigated for prevention are those for cytomegalovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza virus, hepatitis C, and dengue fever, among many others. Fungal and protozoan diseases are also subjects of vaccine research. Among immunoglobulins approved for prophylactic and therapeutic use are those against cytomegalovirus, hepatitis A and B, measles, rabies, and tetanus. With this progress, it is hoped that effective vaccines soon will be developed for many more infectious diseases with cutaneous manifestations.

Hepatitis A booster vaccination: is there a need?

Hepatitis A is one of the most common vaccine-preventable infectious diseases in the world. Effective vaccines against hepatitis A have been available since 1992, and they provide long-term immunity against the infection. However, there is no worldwide consensus on how long protection will last or whether there will be a need for hepatitis A virus (HAV) booster vaccinations in the future. In most countries, booster-vaccination policy is guided by manufacturers' recommendations, national authorities, or both. In June, 2002, a panel of international experts met to review the long-term immunogenicity and protection conferred by HAV vaccine in different population groups. Data have shown that after a full primary vaccination course, protective antibody amounts persist beyond 10 years in healthy individuals, and underlying immune memory provides protection far beyond the duration of anti-HAV antibodies. The group concluded that there is no evidence to lend support to HAV booster vaccination after a full primary vaccination course in a healthy individual. However, further investigations are needed before deciding if boosters can be omitted in special patient-groups.

Immunological priming of one dose of inactivated hepatitis A vaccine given during the first year of life in presence of maternal antibodies

BACKGROUND

In hepatitis A virus (HAV)-seronegative infants, inactivated hepatitis A vaccines are highly immunogenic. On the contrary, in infants who are HAV-seropositive before vaccination, the interfering effect of passively-transferred maternal anti-HAV antibodies leads to lower post-primary immunization anti-HAV levels, as compared to those achieved by seronegative infants. One possible way to overcome this drawback is to delay hepatitis A vaccination later during the first year of life. The objective of the study was to document the immunogenicity of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in 6 months old HAV-seropositive infants, given as two dose regimen consisting of a single primary immunization at 6 months of age, followed by a booster dose 6 months later.

METHODS

The immunogenicity of one hepatitis A vaccine (Avaxim pediatric, Aventis Pasteur) was documented in 108 6 months old, HAV-seropositive infants randomly assigned to receive one priming dose of hepatitis A vaccine either concomitantly with (Group 2) or 2 weeks after the third dose of routine diphteria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis reconstituting lyophilized tetanus conjugated Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTwcP//PRP approximately T) vaccine and oral poliomyelitis vaccine (OPV) (Group 1). A booster dose was given 6 months later, concomitantly with MMR vaccine.

RESULTS

The 91 infants who were HAV-seropositive (ELISA titer >20 mIU/ml) at the moment of primo vaccination remained seropositive 1 month later. Geometric mean titers (GMT) decreased from 292 and 278 mIU/ml 1 month after the first dose, to 77.6 and 76.0 mIU/ml 6 months after, in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. Post-booster titers increased markedly in both groups, with GMTs of 1731 and 1866 mIU/ml and geometric mean post/pre-immunization titer ratios of 22.3 and 24.6, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that immunological priming induced by a single dose of Avaxim pediatric administered to 6 or 6.5 months old, HAV-seropositive infants is present and should not preclude the use of this vaccine in such populations.

Immunizations for international travel

Many infections encountered by international travelers can be prevented by adherence to personal protective measures and appropriate vaccinations. This review outlined the incidence and importance of the major vaccine-preventable infectious diseases encountered by U.S. travelers, as well as the indications, contraindications, and side effects of available vaccines. Official proof of yellow fever vaccine often is required for entry into some countries. Based on endemic or epidemic infections at destinations, planned activities, and age and medical history of international travelers, other vaccines may be recommended. Many clinicians will be familiar with some of the infections and vaccines that may be used in travelers; other vaccines may be encountered infrequently and associated with significant risk of adverse effects. Since vaccines do not provide complete protection and some travel-related infections do not have vaccines available yet (e.g., malaria and dengue fever), physicians need to be vigilant concerning febrile illness in returning travelers.

Hepatitis A vaccine

Hepatitis A is an infectious disease frequently reported in the United States. An average of 26,000 cases were reported each year during 1980 to 1999; probably 3 times as many occurred. Hepatitis A vaccines provide a powerful new prevention tool. The 2 inactivated hepatitis A vaccines available as pediatric and adult formulations in the United States and in many other countries are safe, immunogenic, and efficacious. A single dose provides excellent short-term protection; the second dose is thought to be important for long-term protection. Because hepatitis A virus (HAV) is excreted in high concentrations in the stool, the principal mode of transmission is person-to-person by the fecal-oral route, most commonly among household and sexual contacts of people with HAV infection. Children can be important in transmission because they frequently have unrecognized or asymptomatic infection. Implementation of recommendations for routine hepatitis A vaccination of children living in areas with consistently elevated hepatitis A rates appears to be resulting in dramatic declines in the overall incidence of the disease. Improved vaccination coverage and continued monitoring of incidence rates are needed to determine the overall long-term impact of this strategy.

Travel vaccines and elderly persons: review of vaccines available in the United States

Aging is associated with alterations in immune responses and may lead to clinically significant changes in the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of certain vaccines. This review summarizes published data regarding the effects of age on responses after immunization with vaccines generally administered before travel. The specific vaccines discussed in detail include hepatitis A, typhoid, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis, and rabies vaccines. There is some evidence of diminished serological responses to hepatitis A and rabies vaccines in older individuals. In addition, increased toxic effects following yellow fever vaccination in elderly recipients have recently been reported. However, many travel-related vaccines have never been studied specifically in elderly populations. Consideration of potential age-related differences in responses to travel vaccines is becoming increasingly important as elderly persons more frequently venture to exotic destinations.

Travel-related vaccines

Travelers are at increased risk for several infections, including familiar infections such as measles that are widely distributed but more common in developing countries. Vaccines can markedly decrease the risk for many of these infections and are an important part of pretravel preparation. Travel provides an opportunity to review and update routine vaccines in adults and assess risk from unusual infections. Global travel is growing. Persons who are elderly, HIV-infected, and immunocompromised account for many of the travelers. Studies that assess the immunogenicity, efficacy, and adverse effects of some of the special vaccines used primarily in travelers generally have been done in young, healthy populations. Findings in young adults do not apply to other populations in whom immune response can be slower, less effective, and less durable. Recent reports of severe adverse events in elderly persons who have received yellow fever vaccine are a reminder that widely used, old vaccines can have unexpected side effects when used in a new population. It is biologically plausible that adverse effects might be more common in the elderly, and epidemiologically plausible that occasional instances of similar adverse events in the past could have been missed. Studies on special and travel vaccines in the elderly are needed urgently to define how these vaccines should be used in older populations and whether alternative means for protection are needed.

Randomized, cross-over, controlled comparison of two inactivated hepatitis A vaccines

The immunogenicity, tolerability and interchangeability of two hepatitis A vaccines, Vaqta (Merck and Co.) and Havrix (SmithKline) were studied in a randomized, crossover, controlled clinical trial. Vaccine was administered to 201 volunteers at 0 and 26 weeks in one of four vaccine regimens: Havrix-Havrix; Havrix-Vaqta; Vaqta-Havrix or Vaqta-Vaqta. Seroconversion rates (>/=10 mIU/ml) for those whose first dose was Vaqta or Havrix, respectively, were: 41/96 (43%) versus 30/95 (32%) (P=0.15) at 2 weeks and 91/98 (93%) versus 84/97 (87%) (P=0.43) at 4 weeks, and 100% at 26 weeks. Geometric mean concentrations (GMC) of total antibody to hepatitis A virus (anti-HAV) for Vaqta and Havrix were 189 and 114 mIU/ml (P=0.011) at 4 weeks and 234 and 136 mIU/ml (P<0.001) at 26 weeks. At 30 weeks, the GMC after two doses of Havrix was 2612 mIU/ml compared with 5497 after two doses of Vaqta (P<0.001). The GMC in the Havrix-Vaqta group was 5672 mIU/ml compared with 3077 mIU/ml in the Vaqta-Havrix group (P<0.001). Less than half of vaccine recipients reported tenderness or pain. In this study, seroconversion rates of the two vaccines were similar. Vaqta produces significantly higher anti-HAV antibody than Havrix. Crossover immunization is well tolerated and results in high antibody concentrations, especially when Vaqta is the booster dose. The significance of higher anti-HAV antibody concentrations in terms of long-term protection is unknown.

Active versus passive immunization against hepatitis A in the Israel defence forces: a cost-benefit analysis

We compared cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses of hepatitis A prevention with immune serum globulin (ISG) vs inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (iHAV) in the Israel Defence Forces. Personnel were grouped according to conditions and duration of service and analyses were performed based on maximum and minimum hepatitis A projected incidences for each group. For standing army soldiers in field units, iHAV is economically superior compared with ISG. For the five other groups studied, the reverse is true. Expected increases in production costs of ISG and expected decreases in costs of iHAV are likely to make iHAV more economical in the future.

Comparison of immunogenicity of two hepatitis A vaccines--VAQTA and HAVRIX--in young adults

Two new hepatitis A vaccines have been developed, and their immunogenicity tested using different immunoassays. The present study was designed to compare the immunogenicity of these two hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines--VAQTA and HAVRIX--as determined by seroconversion rates and anti-HAV titers, and using the same immunoassay. Healthy volunteers (15-30 y), seronegative for anti-HAV, were randomized in an open single center study to four groups of 20-21 vaccinees each, to receive either a 25 U or a 50 U dose of VAQTA, or HAVRIX at 720 EU or 1440 EU/dose, administered at 0, 1 and 6 m or at 0 and 6 m, respectively. Four weeks after primary immunization, seroconversion rates were 100% for VAQTA and 95% for HAVRIX, following injection of 50 U or 1440 EU, respectively (p = NS) and anti-HAV GMTs were 40 and 37 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively. At 6 months, prior to the booster dose, seroconversion rates were 100% for both vaccines, with anti-HAV GMTs of 111 and 70 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively (P < 0.05). At month 7, four weeks after the only booster injection, using the two dose regimen, anti-HAV titers were 2212 and 1511 mIU/ml for VAQTA and HAVRIX, respectively (P < NS). Using three doses of 25 U/dose of VAQTA or 720 EU/dose of HAVRIX at 0, 1 and 6 m did not produce any clinically evaluable advantage over the two dose regimen for either vaccine. No significant adverse events were observed using either vaccine. In summary, both vaccines have similar immunogenicity demonstrated using identical immunoassays for evaluation. These results also confirm the outstanding immunogenicity of a single dose of either of the HAV vaccines and support their use in pre- and possibly postexposure prophylaxis against hepatitis A virus infection.

Considerations of HAV vaccine in India

Currently available evidence indicates that most parts of India still quality to be hyper-endemic regions and hence recommendations for vaccinations developed for low endemicity regions are not applicable. There are however, some pockets which showed evidence of distinct epidemiologic shift. There is need to identify geographic regions like Kerala which have potential for epidemic outbreaks through cyclic sero-epidemiological surveys. With economic development and consequent improvements in the levels of sanitation and quality of water supplies, more such areas will be identified. Efforts to improve sanitation and personal hygiene will remain as the most important and efficient intervention to retard the transmission of HAV. Unless a critical improvement in the living standards of our population is achieved, aim of eradicating HAV infection from the community is not realistic. Presently, the cost of three doses of HAV is exorbitant and the focus of HAV vaccination will have to be restricted to individual protection who are likely to remain unexposed till adulthood and can afford to pay for it. HAV Infection below 5 years is mostly asymptomatic. The most efficient use of resources will therefore be to offer HAV vaccine to high risk individuals beyond this age after screening for antibodies against HAV.

The effect of age and weight on the response to formalin inactivated, alum-adjuvanted hepatitis A vaccine in healthy adults

Formalin-inactivated, alum-adsorbed, hepatitis A vaccine was evaluated in 100 healthy adults who were stratified at enrollment into two age groups: 18-39 years: n = 50; 40-65 years: n = 50. All individuals received vaccine at 25 U of viral antigen. After stratification, both groups were randomized to receive either vaccination at 0 and 24 weeks or vaccination at 0.2 and 24 weeks. Subjects were bled for serology at 0, 2, 4, 24, 28 weeks and 1 year. The seroconversion rate and geometric mean titer (GMT = mIU ml-1) after one dose of vaccine was lower for older subjects [second week: < 40 years: 15/25 (60%) (GMT: 12.9). > 40 years: 5/22 (23%) (GMT: 6.1): fourth week: < 40 years: 20/22 (91%) (GMT: 29.0), > 40 years: 16/23 (70%) (GMT: 14.3)]. After a second dose at 2 weeks the seroresponse improved so that there were no longer differences between age groups [24 weeks: < 40: 21/22 (95%) (GMT: 123.9), > 40: 22/23 (96%) (GMT: 106.1)]. A third dose at 24 weeks resulted in a 20-40-fold increase in GMT in both age groups. As a separate evaluation height, weight, skin fold thickness, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed by logistic regression for their ability to predict serologic response. Serologic response was significantly associated with lower weight (P = 0.032) and BMI (P = 0.024) but not with height or skin fold thickness. Hepatitis A vaccine was well tolerated, with no serious adverse experiences. Adults older than 40 years appear to respond less well than younger adults to a single dose of 25 U of hepatitis A vaccine but equally well after two doses of vaccine. The slower antibody response to hepatitis A vaccine in overweight individuals was not attributable to skin adipose tissue.

Evaluation of the timing of the booster injection after a primary vaccination against hepatitis A

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and the timing of booster injection of a lyophilized, inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (HAV), we studied the acquired anti-hepatitis A virus titres in 45 subjects who received either two or three doses of the vaccine. With three doses > or = 0.5 microgram administered at 0, 1 and 6 months, antibody titres increased to approximately half those seen in people with a history of natural hepatitis A infection. Although the titres decreased gradually, all subjects remained anti-HAV positive at least 5 years after the third injection. The geometric mean titre exceeded 100 mIU/mL, which approximated the highest titre obtainable by the inoculation of immune serum globulin. A prompt antibody reaction was seen with two doses administered 2 weeks apart, with the titres achieved being 5.6-fold the peak titres obtained by the inoculation of immune serum globulin. All 33 subjects were antibody positive 18 months after the first injection, but some became seronegative by 30 months, suggesting that a third booster dose would be desirable at 18 months.

Does immunoglobulin interfere with the immunogenicity to Pasteur Mérieux inactivated hepatitis A vaccine?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the immunogenicity of Pasteur Mérieux (P.M. s.v.) inactivated hepatitis A vaccine when given alone with its immunogenicity when given in combination with immunoglobulin.

METHODS

We enrolled 80 healthy volunteers who were seronegative for anti-HAV. Forty subjects (group A) were given two doses of vaccine at 0 and 6 months plus 4 ml of immunoglobulin given simultaneously with the first vaccine injection; and 40 subjects (group B) were given vaccine alone. The population characteristics (age, sex, height and weight) of the two groups were comparable.

RESULTS

Anti-HAV antibody was detectable at week 1 in 100% of group A and in 5.7% of group B, and in 100% of both groups at 4 and 8 weeks. Seroconversion rates (> or = 20 mIU/ml) were 97.4% in group A and 100% in group B at week 24 and were 100% in both groups 4 weeks after a booster injection at 6 months. The antibody response level was lower after concomitant administration of vaccine with immunoglobulin. The antibody geometric mean titer was higher at week 1 in subjects who had been given vaccine and immunoglobulin, but nearly 50% lower at week 4 and thereafter, indicating inhibition of the vaccine-induced immune response by immunoglobulin. At week 28, i.e. 4 weeks after the booster injection, geometric mean titers had increased about 13-15 times in both groups, reaching highly protective antibody levels (3351 mIU/ml in group A and 5843 mIU/ml in group B). No serious adverse effects were observed during the follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that P.M. s.v. hepatitis A vaccine is highly immunogenic and safe, even when given simultaneously with immunoglobulin. Despite the interference of the immunoglobulin with the active immune response, individuals who were immunized passively plus actively also developed high titers of anti-HAV antibody. It is therefore reasonable to expect that this inhibition will not affect the overall protection conferred by the vaccine.

Progress toward the development of a genetically engineered attenuated hepatitis A virus vaccine

Mutations which positively affect growth of hepatitis A virus in cell culture may negatively affect growth in vivo. Therefore, development of an attenuated vaccine for hepatitis A may require a careful balancing of mutations to produce a virus that will grow efficiently in cells suitable for vaccine production and still maintain a satisfactory level of attenuation in vivo. Since such a balance could be achieved most directly by genetic engineering, we are analyzing mutations that accumulated during serial passage of the HM-175 strain of hepatitis A virus in MRC-5 cell cultures in order to determine the relative importance of the mutations for growth in MRC-5 cells and for attenuation in susceptible primates. Chimeric viral genomes of the HM-175 strain were constructed from cDNA clones derived from a virulent virus and from two attenuated viruses adapted to growth in African green monkey kidney (AGMK) and MRC-5 cells, respectively. Viruses encoded by these chimeric genomes were recovered by in vitro or in vivo transfection and assessed for their ability to grow in cultured MRC-5 cells or to cause hepatitis in primates (tamarins). The only MRC-5-specific mutations that substantially increased the efficiency of growth in MRC-5 cells were a group of four mutations in the 5' noncoding (NC) region. These 5' NC mutations and a separate group of 5' NC mutations that accumulated during earlier passages of the HM-175 virus in primary AGMK cells appeared, independently and additively, to result in decreased biochemical evidence of hepatitis in tamarins. However, neither group of 5' NC mutations had a demonstrable effect on the extent of virus excretion or liver pathology in these animals.

New and improved vaccines. Promising weapons against varicella, hepatitis A, and typhoid fever

The initial motives behind development of vaccines were to protect against life-threatening infections (eg, rabies, diphtheria), to eradicate sweeping outbreaks of serious diseases (eg, paralytic poliomyelitis, smallpox), and to prevent diseases in a vulnerable population by the immunization of surrogates (eg, rubella immunization to prevent congenital rubella syndrome). Now a fourth motive emerges: prevention of less serious infections to improve quality of life. The advantages of new vaccines and immunization programs should no longer be measured exclusively in terms of the number of lives saved but should take into account direct and indirect cost savings and overall benefit to individual and societal health and well-being. Although varicella and hepatitis A infections can be life-threatening, most cases are self-limited and have no significant sequelae. Immunization is more likely to improve quality of life than to save lives. Vaccination against typhoid remains a potentially lifesaving act in developing nations, but even the newer typhoid vaccines were developed primarily to reduce the frequency and severity of adverse reactions to immunization rather than to improve the protective efficacy of the original heat-phenol inactivated vaccine. Varicella virus vaccine, hepatitis A virus vaccines, and the typhoid polysaccharide Vi capsular vaccine represent important additions to immunization agents. These vaccines are immunogenic, clinically effective, and generally safe, with infrequent and usually mild adverse reactions. Their favorable benefit-risk ratio should encourage their appropriate use. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Family Physicians have already recommended varicella vaccine for universal immunization of children. Formal recommendations that hepatitis A vaccine also be routinely used for all children may be forthcoming in the next few years; in the meantime, persons at high risk should be immunized. Typhoid vaccination will likely continue to be used selectively for those who have significant contact with the organism or those who travel to typhoid-endemic countries.

Immunogenicity and safety of a new inactivated hepatitis A vaccine in a comparative study

A multicentre, controlled, randomised, open, comparative trial including 839 healthy adult volunteers was carried out in order to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of two vaccines against hepatitis A virus (HAV) during primary immunization and after booster injection. The first vaccine was produced by Pasteur Mérieux (PM), and the second vaccine by Smith-Kline Beecham (SKB). The vaccination schedule consisted of 2 doses (months 0, 6) for PM and 3 doses (months 0, 1, and 6) for SKB. Two weeks after the first dose, the seroconversion rates among initially HAV seronegative subjects (n = 608) were 93.4% and 76.1% for the PM and SKB vaccines, respectively, the corresponding geometric mean titres (GMTs) were 59.0 mIU/ml versus 30.8 mlU/ml (modified RIA HAVAB assay, Abbott Laboratories). Two months after the beginning of immunization (one dose versus two doses) the GMTs were 138.4 and 161.6 mlU/ml, respectively. At month 7, the seroconversion rates were 100% for both vaccines, and the GMTs were 4,189 and 3,163 mlU/ml, respectively. After the first dose of vaccine, 24.6% and 19.6% of the PM and SKB vaccines reported local reactions. The rates for systemic reactions were 27.2% and 25.0%, respectively. Lower rates for local and systemic reactions were seen after booster injections and statistical differences were not observed between the two vaccines. The study also demonstrated that vaccination was as well tolerated in subjects with anti-HAV antibodies as in HAV seronegative subjects. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant vaccine effect on seroconversion rates only at week 2 (P < 10(-4). The same conclusions were drawn from the analysis of GMT by multivariate regression.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Control of hepatitis A by inactivated vaccines: unanswered questions and unresolved issues

The recent development of safe and effective inactivated hepatitis A virus vaccines provides for the first time the opportunity to control hepatitis A. However, control will depend upon the intelligent use of the vaccines. How and when hepatitis A vaccines should be used will be determined from the results of studies of the levels and duration of protective antibody, determination of optimum immunization schedules, estimations of the continuing need for normal immune globulin and discussions of how hepatitis A vaccine can be incorporated into national and international vaccination programs. Cost and feasibility will determine whether live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines will become useful adjuncts or replacements for inactivated hepatitis A vaccines.