Ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C unresponsive to alfa interferon

Meta-Analysis of Grazoprevir plus Elbasvir for Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Grazoprevir is an NS3/4A protease inhibitor (PI), while elbasvir is an NS5A inhibitor. We performed this meta-analysis to directly compare grazoprevir plus elbasvir and ribavirin regimen vs. grazoprevir and elbasvir without ribavirin in the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and to precisely evaluate the efficacy of the latter regimen in cirrhotic, IL28 CC genotype patients and those coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A computer literature search of PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, Embase, and Cochrane central was conducted. Studies were screened for eligibility. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were pooled using OpenMeta[Analyst] software for windows. A subgroup analysis was performed to stratify the treatment efficacy according to the different baseline characteristics of HCV patients.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials (n = 1,297 patients) were pooled in the final analysis. The overall SVR rate was 96.6% with 95% CI [95.5% to 98%]. For cirrhotic patients, the SVR rate was 95.7% with 95% CI [93.9% to 97.5%] and for non-cirrhotic patients, the SVR rate was 97% with 95% CI [95.9% to 98.4%]. Furthermore, the addition of ribavirin (RBV) to the treatment regimen did not significantly improve the SVR (RR 1.003, 95% CI [0.944 to 1.065]). The dual regimen was effective in patient populations with NS3 resistance-associated (RAS). However, this regimen achieved lower SVR rates (< 90%) in patients with NS5A RAS.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the 12-week treatment regimen of the fixed dose combination of grazoprevir plus elbasvir achieved high SVR rates in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. The addition of ribavirin to this regimen did not add a significant benefit.

Ribavirin revisited in the era of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection

Over the past two decades, ribavirin has been an integral component of treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, where it has been shown to improve the efficacy of (pegylated) interferon. However, because of treatment-limiting side effects and its additive toxicity with interferon, the search for interferon- and ribavirin-free regimens has been underway. The recent approvals of all-oral direct acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized the HCV therapeutic landscape, and initially it was expected that the role of ribavirin with DAA regimens would be eliminated. On the contrary, what we have witnessed is that ribavirin retains an important role in the optimal treatment of some subgroups of patients, particularly those that historically have been considered the most difficult to cure. Fortunately, it has also been recognized that the safety profile of ribavirin is improved when co-administered with all-oral DAA combinations in the absence of interferon. Despite the antiviral mechanism of action of ribavirin being poorly understood, we now have a range of novel insights into the potential role of ribavirin in all-oral DAA HCV treatment and greater insight into the antiviral mechanism by which it continues to provide clinical benefit for defined patient groups.

Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir with and without ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype-1 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir are new direct-acting antiviral agents for patients with HCV infection. Ledipasvir inhibits the HCV non-structural 5A protein, while sofosbuvir is a nucleotide polymerase inhibitor. Many studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir combination with and without ribavirin for patients with chronic HCV genotype-1.

METHODS

A computer literature search of PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Knowledge and Cochrane CENTRAL has been conducted. Studies were screened for eligibility and data were extracted. Sustained virological response (SVR) rate and commonly reported adverse events were pooled as risk ratio (RR) using Review Manager version 5.3 for windows and OpenMeta (Analyst) software.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials (n=1,892) were pooled in the final analysis. A 12-week ledipasvir and sofosbuvir regimen achieved SVR in 97.5% and 89% of non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients, respectively. A 24-week ledipasvir and sofosbuvir regimen achieved SVR in 99.6% and 92.6% in non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients, respectively. When ribavirin was added to the treatment regiment, the SVR did not differ significantly in either of the treatment regimens (12-week SVR: 93.9% versus 96.7%, RR=0.97, P=0.19 and 24-week SVR: 94.8% versus 97.2%, RR=0.98, P=0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir achieved high SVR rates (>90%) in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with HCV genotype-1. The addition of ribavirin to this regimen did not significantly increase the SVR rates.

Review article: management of chronic hepatitis C in patients with contraindications to anti-viral therapy

BACKGROUND

There are patients with chronic hepatitis C who are not eligible for the current interferon-based therapies or refuse to be treated due to secondary effects.

AIM

To provide information on alternative treatments for the management of these patients.

METHODS

A PubMed search was performed to identify relevant literature. Search terms included hepatitis C virus, anti-inflammatory treatment, antioxidant, natural products and alternative treatment, alone or in combination. Additional publications were identified using the references cited by primary and review articles.

RESULTS

Several approaches, such as iron depletion (phlebotomy), treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid or glycyrrhizin, have anti-inflammatory and/or anti-fibrotic effects. Life interventions like weight loss, exercise and coffee consumption are associated with a biochemical improvement. Other alternatives (ribavirin monotherapy, amantadine, silibinin, vitamin supplementation, etc.) do not have any beneficial effect or need to be tested in larger clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

There are therapeutic strategies and lifestyle interventions that can be used to improve liver damage in patients with chronic hepatitis C who cannot receive or refuse interferon-based treatments.

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Standard therapy is ribavirin plus pegylated interferon to achieve undetectable level of virus in the blood, but the effect on clinical outcomes is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained loss of hepatitis C virus, liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. We performed subgroup analyses of patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. All outcomes were analysed with the random-effects model. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR). We used trial sequential analyses to examine the robustness of our findings.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 83 randomised trials with 12,707 patients. Most trials had unclear or high risk of bias. We did not find any significant influence of bias on our results but cannot exclude outcome measure reporting bias as many trials did not report on the primary outcomes of this review. Compared with interferon, ribavirin plus interferon had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 0.75), relapsers (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.70), non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.93), and in all patients (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.79). Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality in all patients (Peto OR, 0.43, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.79), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of haematological, dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnoea, fatigue) adverse reactions. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation and dose reductions. Trial sequential analyses confirmed our findings regarding virological effects, but not regarding liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus from the blood. Combination therapy may reduce liver-related morbidity and all-cause mortality, but we need more evidence. The number needed to treat to obtain a beneficial effect is considerable considering the increased risk of several severe adverse reactions and costs.

Ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. A high proportion of patients never experience symptoms. Peginterferon plus ribavirin is the recommended treatment for chronic hepatitis C. However, ribavirin monotherapy may be considered for some patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until March 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status comparing ribavirin versus no intervention, placebo, or interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were serum sustained virological response (loss of hepatitis C virus RNA at least six months after treatment), liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality, and adverse events. Secondary outcome measures were end of treatment virological response, biochemical response (transaminase activity), and histological response. Randomisation methods, blinding, data handling, and funding were extracted as measures of bias control. Random-effects and fixed-effect meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. We only present the results of the fixed-effect model if both models provide the same result regarding statistical significance. We present data as risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 randomised trials with 657 patients. The majority of trials had unclear control of bias. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin had no significant effect on the sustained virological response (RD 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%, five trials) or end of treatment virological response (RD 0% 95% CI -3% to 3%, ten trials). Ribavirin had no significant effect on liver-related morbidity plus mortality (RD 0%, 95% CI -2% to 3%, 11 trials). Ribavirin significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions, including anaemia. Ribavirin significantly improved end of treatment biochemical and histological response but not the sustained biochemical response. Ribavirin was significantly inferior to interferon regarding virological and biochemical responses (five trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Ribavirin seems without beneficial effects on serum virological response and liver-related morbidity or mortality, and significantly increased the risk of adverse reactions. Ribavirin monotherapy seems significantly inferior to interferon monotherapy. The total number of included patients is small, and more trials are perhaps needed. The use of ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C cannot be recommended outside randomised trials.

Assessment of the efficacy of reducing peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin dose on virologic response in Koreans with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The virologic response of Koreans to combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C is similar to westerns; however, dose modification occurs more frequently in Koreans. We evaluated the rates of peginterferon alpha-2a and ribavirin dose modifications and their effect on the virologic response in Koreans.

METHODS

Patients with detectable HCV RNA and enrolled from multicenters were treated with peginterferon alpha-2a (180 microg/week) and ribavirin (800 mg/day) for 24 weeks (genotype non-1, n=37) or peginterferon alpha-2a (180 microg/week) and ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg/day) for 48 weeks (genotype 1, n=55).

RESULTS

Early virologic response (EVR) and sustained virologic response (SVR) were 77.2% (genotype 1, 75%; non-1, 81%) and 66.3% (genotype 1, 56%; non-1, 81%), respectively. The frequency of dose modification was 32.6% within the first 12 weeks and 52.2% during the entire treatment period. No difference was found in SVR regardless of dose modification. However, the SVR for patients using >or=80% of the peginterferon dose was significantly higher than for those using <80% (81.3 vs. 50.0%, p=0.007), despite varying ribavirin doses. No difference was found in SVR regardless of whether the ribavirin dose was <80% or not. These results did not change based on genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that using at least 80% of the peginterferon alpha-2a dose in Koreans not only maintains SVR but also reduces drug side effects during the entire treatment period. A lower dose of ribavirin may be as efficacious as a standard dose.

WITHDRAWN: Ribavirin with or without alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Ribavirin plus interferon combination therapy is presently considered the optimal treatment of interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C, but its role in relapsers and non-responders to previous interferon therapy is not established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of ribavirin alone or in combination with alpha interferon in interferon naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through searches on electronic databases: The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (August 2001), The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2001, MEDLINE (1966 - August 2001), and EMBASE (1985 - August 2001). Manual searches of bibliographies and journals were done as well as authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies producing ribavirin or interferon were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials comparing ribavirin with or without alpha interferon versus no intervention, placebo, or alpha interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the 'sustained' (six months after treatment) virological response, and morbidity plus mortality. The secondary outcome measures were the 'end of treatment' and 'sustained' biochemical response, the 'end of treatment' virologic response, histology, quality of life, and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight trials in which 271 patients were randomised to ribavirin versus placebo or no intervention and 48 trials in which 6585 patients were randomised to interferon with or without ribavirin. Compared with placebo or no intervention, ribavirin monotherapy had no significant effect on the virological response or histology and only a transient effect on the biochemical response. Compared with interferon, combination therapy reduced the risk of not having a sustained virological response by 26% in naive patients (relative risk (RR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.78), 33% in relapsers (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.57-0.78), and 11% in non-responders (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.96). There was no significant effect on morbidity plus mortality (Peto odds ratio 0.45; 95% CI 0.19-1.06). Irrespective of previous therapy, combination therapy significantly reduced the risk of not having a sustained biochemical response (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.84) or improved histology (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56-0.81). Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.07-1.52) and several types of adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy increased the number of naive patients, relapsers, and non-responders with a sustained virological, biochemical, or histological response, but also the occurrence of adverse events.

Ribavirin monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The disease progresses without symptoms for several decades. Ribavirin monotherapy may represent a treatment for some patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effect of ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies until May 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised trials irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status comparing ribavirin versus no intervention, placebo, or interferon for chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the six months sustained loss of hepatitis C virus RNA in blood after end of treatment and liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality. Secondary outcome measures were end of treatment virological response, biochemical response, histological response, and adverse events. Random- and fixed-effects meta-analyses with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed for all outcomes. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality and relative risks (RR) for the remaining outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 13 randomised trials including 594 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Most trials had low methodological quality. Compared with placebo/no intervention, ribavirin had no significant effect on sustained (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.07, five trials) or end of treatment virological response (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.07, ten trials). Ribavirin had no significant effect on liver-related morbidity plus mortality (Peto OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.20 to 19.0, eleven trials). Ribavirin significantly improved end of treatment biochemical and histological response but not sustained biochemical response. Further, ribavirin significantly increased the risk of anaemia. Ribavirin was significantly inferior to interferon regarding virological and biochemical response (four trials).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found that ribavirin versus placebo/no intervention had no significant beneficial effect on virological response and liver morbidity, but may improve biochemical and histological response transiently. Ribavirin increased the risk of anaemia. Therefore, we cannot recommend ribavirin monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C outside randomised trials.

Ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality. The disease progresses without symptoms for several decades and most patients are diagnosed based on the presence of hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid and elevated transaminases.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of ribavirin and interferon combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified trials through electronic databases, manual searches of bibliographies and journals, approaching authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies, until May 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials, irrespective of blinding, language, or publication status, comparing ribavirin plus interferon versus interferon alone for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measures were the sustained loss of hepatitis C virus and liver-related morbidity plus all-cause mortality. We separately analysed patients who were naive, relapsers, or non-responders to previous antiviral treatment. Random-effects and fixed-effect model meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. We used Peto odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for analysis of morbidity plus mortality. The remaining outcomes were presented as relative risks (RR).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 72 randomised trials with 9991 patients. Most trials had low methodological quality but we did not find any significant influence of quality on our results. Compared with interferon, combination therapy had a significant beneficial effect on sustained virological response (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.75) and in subgroups of naive patients (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.76), relapsers (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.73), and non-responders (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.94) individually. Combination therapy significantly reduced morbidity plus mortality (Peto OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96), but not in naive, relapsers, or non-responders individually. Combination therapy also had a significant beneficial effect on the histological response. Combination therapy significantly increased the risk of anaemia (RR 10.48, 95% CI 5.34 to 20.55), which occurred in 22% of patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy also significantly increased the risk of dermatological, gastrointestinal, infectious, and miscellaneous (cough, dyspnea, fatigue) adverse events. Accordingly, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation (RR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.39).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with interferon alone, ribavirin plus interferon is more effective in clearing hepatitis C virus and improving liver histology. This may lead to reduced morbidity and mortality. However, combination therapy significantly increased the risk of several adverse events.

Neuroprotection and reduced proliferation of microglia in ribavirin-treated bornavirus-infected rats

In a rat model of Borna disease, intracerebral ribavirin caused clinical improvement without changes in virus titer or nucleic acid. Levels of microglia and infiltrating CD4 and CD8 cells were decreased, despite increases in mRNAs encoding interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), IL-10, and gamma interferon in the brain. Intracerebral ribavirin may reduce morbidity through effects on microglia cell proliferation.

Management strategies for ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia in the treatment of hepatitis C: clinical and economic implications

OBJECTIVES

Recently published studies have demonstrated increased efficacy and cost-effectiveness of combination therapy with interferon and alpha-2b/ribavirin compared with interferon-alpha monotherapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Combination therapy is associated with a clinically important adverse effect: ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia (RIHA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the direct health-care costs and management of RIHA during treatment of CHC in a clinical trial setting.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to synthesize information on the incidence and management of RIHA. Decision-analytic techniques were used to estimate the cost of treating RIHA. Uncertainty was evaluated using sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

RIHA, defined as a reduction in hemoglobin to less than 100 g/L, occurs in approximately 7% to 9% of patients treated with combination therapy. The standard of care for management of RIHA is reduction or discontinuation of the ribavirin dosage. We estimated the direct cost of treating clinically significant RIHA to be $170 per patient receiving combination therapy per 48-week treatment course (range $68-$692). The results of the one-way sensitivity analyses ranged from $57 to $317. In comparison, the cost of 48 weeks of combination therapy is $16,459.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct cost of treating clinically significant RIHA is 1% ($170/$16,459) of drug treatment costs. Questions remain about the optimal dose of ribavirin and the incidence of RIHA in a real-world population. Despite these uncertainties, this initial evaluation of the direct cost of treating RIHA provides an estimate of the cost and management implications of this clinically important adverse effect.

Treatment of chronic viral hepatitis

Significant advances have been made in the treatment of both hepatitis B and C. Cure for the majority is becoming reality. Combination regimens are now established therapy in hepatitis C and the near future will see the adoption of a similar approach to hepatitis B. Interferon alpha therapy remains important, with the development of more efficacious pegylated forms. In this article we review current therapy and discuss future strategies of the therapy for chronic viral hepatitis.

Combination of “low-dose” ribavirin and interferon alfa-2a therapy followed by interferon alfa-2a monotherapy in chronic HCV-infected non-responders and relapsers after interferon alfa-2a monotherapy

AIM: To report on the efficacy, safety and tolerability of interferon alfa-2a combined with a “low dose” of ribavirin for relapsers and non-responders to alpha interferon monotherapy.

METHODS: Thirty four chronic hepatitis C virus infected non responders to interferon alfa-2a monotherapy (a course of at least 3 months treatment) and 13 relapsers to interferon alfa-2a monotherapy (a dose of 3 to 6 million units three times per week for at least 20 weeks but not more than 18 months) were treated with the same dose of interferon alfa-2a used before (3 to 6 million units three times per week) and ribavirin (10 mg/kg daily) for 6 months. In complete responders, interferon alfa-2a was administered for further 6 months at the same dose used before as monotherapy.

RESULTS: Seven (20.6%) of 34 non responders stopped the combined therapy due to adverse events, including two patients with histological and clinical Child A cirrhosis. In 17/27 (63%) non responders, the combined therapy was stopped after three months because of non response. Ten of the 27 non responders completed the 12 month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 28 months (16-37 months) after the treatment, 4/10 (15%) previous non responders still remained complete responders. All 13 previous relapsers completed the 12-month treatment course. At a mean follow up of 22 months (9-36 months) after treatment, 6/13 (46%) the previous relapsers were still sustained complete responders.

CONCLUSION: Our treatment schedule of the combined therapy for 6 months of interferon alfa-2a with a low dose of ribavirin (10 mg/kg/day) followed by 6 months of interferon alfa-2a monotherapy is able to induce a sustained complete response rate in 15% of non responders and 46% of relapsers with chronic hepatitis C virus related liver diseases comparable to those obtained with the standard doses of ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day. Randomized prospective controlled trials using lower total amounts of ribavirin in combination with interferon should be performed.

Time course of serum hepatitis C virus-RNA during chronic hepatitis C treatment accurately predicts the type of response

AIM

To establish the value of alanine aminotransferase normalization and hepatitis C virus-RNA clearance as predictors of sustained virological response in naïve and relapser chronic hepatitis C patients on mono or combination therapy.

METHODS

A total of 282 hepatitis C patients were studied: 98 naïves on interferon, and 64 naïves and 75 relapsers on interferon plus oral ribavirin; 45 patients were excluded. Drugs were administered at standard doses for 12 months. Alanine aminotransferase and hepatitis C virus-RNA were determined at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, and at 72 and 96 weeks after completion of therapy.

RESULTS

The rate of sustained response was greater (P < 0.05) in naïves and relapsers on combination therapy (33% and 48%, respectively) than in naïves on interferon alone (16%). Hepatitis C virus-RNA significantly decreased from baseline by week 4 in naïves on interferon and relapsers on combination therapy and by week 12 in naïves on combination therapy. Alanine aminotransferase levels paralleled viremic load in naïves on interferon, yet in patients on combination therapy, alanine aminotransferase normalized independently of the virological response. During treatment, the main factor associated with sustained response was hepatitis C virus-RNA clearance by week 4 in naïves on interferon and relapsers on combination therapy, and by week 24 in naïves on combination therapy.

CONCLUSION

Clearance of viraemia constitutes the best predictor of a sustained response to therapy, but needs to be measured at patient-specific times.

Combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection

OBJECTIVE

To review and critique the medical literature regarding the combination of interferon and ribavirin in the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (January 1966-June 1999) was conducted to identify human clinical trials regarding the combination of interferon and ribavirin therapy for the initial treatment of chronic HCV. Bibliographies were reviewed for relevant literature.

STUDY SELECTION

Clinical trials of combination interferon and ribavirin for the treatment of chronic HCV in interferon-naïve adults were reviewed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The combination of ribavirin and interferon in the treatment of chronic HCV has been beneficial in patients who are interferon-naïve. Patients with predictors of poor response, such as baseline cirrhosis, male gender, age >40 years, high baseline viral loads (>2 x 10(6) copies/mL), and genotype 1 respond better to combination treatment when compared with those who receive interferon monotherapy. Patients with genotype 1 and/or high viral loads may benefit most from 48 weeks of combination therapy; however, adverse effects are of greater concern in these patients. Monitoring can limit these complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy is effective in the treatment of interferon-naive patients with chronic HCV infection. Patients should be evaluated for duration of treatment with combination therapy by determination of predictors of response. Further trials are needed to more closely evaluate the duration of treatment and to determine the best patient population to receive combination therapy.

Increased hepatic iron deposition resulting from treatment of chronic hepatitis C with ribavirin

Increased levels of hepatic iron may impair the response of patients with chronic hepatitis C to treatment with interferon-alfa, but combination therapy with ribavirin has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of hepatitis C. When used alone or with interferon-alfa, ribavirin may cause a dose-dependent reversible hemolytic anemia. We compared the extent and cellular localization of iron deposition in liver tissue from biopsy specimens obtained before and after 36 weeks of therapy with ribavirin or placebo for 59 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Paired slides were available for review from 26 ribavirin and 27 placebo recipients. Iron deposition was assessed using coded slides stained with Perls Prussian blue and was semi-quantitated in hepatocytes, Kupffer cells, and areas of fibrosis. The overall iron score fell by 0.96 in the placebo group and increased 1.69 in the ribavirin recipients. Iron was deposited mainly in hepatocytes; the hepatocyte iron score increased from 2.19 to 3.81 in the ribavirin group. The amount of iron staining in Kupffer cells declined in the placebo group and increased slightly in the ribavirin group. Iron changes in areas of fibrosis were minor and did not differ between groups. Increased total hepatic iron deposition occurred during a 9-month course of ribavirin. Ribavirin-associated hemolysis deposits iron preferentially in hepatocytes. This increased deposition of hepatic iron does not seem to affect the biochemical or histologic response to ribavirin therapy but may have implications for hepatocyte susceptibility to future injury.

Long-term re-treatment with interferon and ribavirin combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C who are non-responders to interferon alone: a preliminary study

We evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of ribavirin and IFN-alpha combination therapy over 12 months in 28 patients who were non-responders to IFN-alpha alone. Of 24 patients who have finished the therapy, 6 (25%) obtained a complete response (normal ALT and negative HCV RNA) at the end of treatment and maintained a sustained response 27% (5/18).

Interferon alpha-2B and ribavirin in combination for patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to, or relapsed after, interferon alpha therapy: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had either failed to respond to therapy with interferon alpha (nonresponders), or who had relapsed after interferon therapy (relapsers).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Four hundred patients with chronic hepatitis C (200 nonresponders and 200 relapsers) were randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive either subcutaneous administration of recombinant interferon alpha-2b (3 million units three times per week) and ribavirin (1,000 to 1,200 mg/daily orally) or interferon alpha-2b alone (6 million units three times per week). Both ribavirin and interferon alpha-2b were given for 24 weeks. The patients were then followed for an additional 24 weeks.

RESULTS

At the end of the treatment period, normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase levels and absence of hepatitis C virus RNA were seen in 21% of nonresponders and in 39% of relapsers who were treated with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin, compared with 5% of nonresponders (P = 0.001) and 9% of relapsers treated with interferon alpha-2b alone (P <0.001). At the end of follow-up, 14% of nonresponders and 30% of relapsers treated with the combination therapy had a sustained response, compared with 1% of nonresponders (P = 0.001) and 5% of relapsers treated with interferon alpha alone (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A 24-week course of treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin offers a chance of sustained response, whereas retreatment with interferon alpha-2b alone does not give satisfactory results. The role of long-term therapy in inducing prolonged remission remains to be explored.

[Antiviral treatment of hepatitis C virus infection]

Hepatitis C virus infection is common and almost always chronic and can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. The primary goal of the treatment is virus eradication and the secondary is to reduce inflammation and liver cell damage. Interferon is the only effective therapy but disappearance of the virus is sustained in only 10 to 15%. The factors most closely associated with a response to treatment are absence of cirrhosis, low serum hepatitis C virus RNA level and genotype other than type 1. Recent studies have suggested that interferon treatment may reduce the subsequent risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in responders. The combination of interferon and oral ribavirin therapy increase the sustained response rate to about 40% in initial treatment and 50% for the treatment of relapse. The other therapeutic combination are less well documented. New agents such as hepatitis C virus-specific anti-protease may be available in the next future and treatment is evolving toward multiple-drug regimens.

A randomized trial of ribavirin and interferon-alpha vs. interferon-alpha alone in patients with chronic hepatitis C who were non-responders to a previous treatment. Multicenter Study Group under the coordination of the Necker Hospital, Paris, France

BACKGROUND/AIM

Fifty percent of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) show no response to alpha-interferon, and no alternative therapy has thus far proven to be effective. Therapeutic combination with ribavirin and alpha-interferon has shown promising results in naive patients and in relapsers, but based on limited series, it was reported to be inefficient in non-responders. The aim of our study was therefore to explore and compare, in a randomized trial, the tolerance and potential efficacy of alpha-interferon alone with a sequential combination of ribavirin and the same alpha-interferon regimen in those patients.

METHODS

Sixty-four non-responder patients were randomized in the alpha2b-interferon group (a 6-month course at a dosage of 6 MU followed by a 6-month course of 3 MU three times weekly subcutaneously) and 62 in the "combination" group (sequential combination of the same alpha2b-interferon therapy preceded by a 2-month course of ribavirin which was then associated for 2 months with alpha2b-interferon at a daily dosage of 1.0 or 1.2 g).

RESULTS

Treatment withdrawal was necessary for six patients from the alpha-interferon and eight patients from the combination group. Normalization of aminotransferase activities was significantly more frequent after the 4-month course of ribavirin with 2 months of interferon than after 2 months of interferon alone (52.8 vs. 26.2%, p<0.01), but this difference was not maintained after ribavirin withdrawal. Disappearance of serum HCV RNA (PCR) was significantly more frequent at the end of treatment in the combination group (24.5 vs. 7.7%, p=0.02), but did not differ 6 months after the end of therapy (9.8 and 8.3%, respectively). The long-term response was not associated with liver status (cirrhosis vs. absence of cirrhosis) or genotype. Mean viremia was significantly lower in long-term responders than in non-responders or relapsers in both groups (p<0.001 for the interferon group and p<0.05 for the combination group), but the large extent of viral load precluded reliable prediction. The pre- and post-treatment hepatitis activity index did not differ between the two groups. While a crude histopathological improvement in the hepatitis activity index for a given patient was more frequently observed in the combination group (69.2 vs. 35.9%, p<0.01), improvement as defined by a decrease of at least 2 in the hepatitis activity index was significant only for lobular necrosis and degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the efficacy of the combination of ribavirin/alpha-interferon in non-responders. Indeed, (i) it is fairly tolerated; (ii) it increases the rate of the initial biological response, and of the virological response by decreasing breakthrough, though this benefit is not sustained; and (iii) it induces a significant histological improvement in necrosis. A simultaneous and prolonged combination of ribavirin/alpha-interferon should be further evaluated in non-responders.

Changes in serum hepatitis C virus RNA in interferon nonresponders retreated with interferon plus ribavirin: a preliminary report

Ribavirin, a nucleoside analogue, inhibits replication of RNA and DNA viruses and may control hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection through modulation of anti-inflammatory and antiviral actions. Ribavirin monotherapy has no effect on serum HCV RNA levels. In combination with interferon, this agent appears to enhance the efficacy of interferon. The aim of this study was to monitor serum HCV RNA levels early during therapy with interferon and ribavirin compared with that previously seen in the same patients during interferon monotherapy. Five patients who previously showed no response to therapy with interferon alfa 3 MU three times weekly for 6 months were retreated with the identical dose of interferon alfa 2b in combination with oral ribavirin 1,000 mg/day. Serum HCV RNA levels were monitored at baseline, week 4, week 8, and week 12 of therapy by a quantitative multicycle polymerase chain reaction assay. In the first 8 to 12 weeks, serum HCV RNA levels showed a greater decrease in all patients when retreated with combination therapy compared with interferon alone. Mean (+/- SEM) serum HCV RNA levels for interferon therapy alone were 3.3 +/- 0.95, 1.2 +/- 0.95, 1.6 +/- 1.2, and 2.3 +/- 1.2 x 10(6) copies/ml at week 0, 4, 8, and 12, respectively. This was compared with 3.3 +/- 0.83, 0.3 +/- 0.2, 0.03 +/- 0.02, and 0.15 +/- 0.14 x 10(6), respectively, for the interferon and ribavirin group (p < 0.07 at week 8). Two of five patients had undetectable serum HCV RNA during combination therapy. Combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin in prior interferon nonresponders reduces serum HCV RNA levels compared with interferon alone. This may suggest some additional antiviral effect of ribavirin when given with interferon.

Interferon-alpha plus ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C resistant to previous interferon-alpha course: results of a randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Interferon-alpha plus ribavirin seem to be more efficacious than interferon monotherapy in chronic hepatitis C. In a multicenter randomized trial, we evaluated the efficacy of this association for interferon-alpha resistant chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Fifty patients who were non-responders to recombinant or lymphoblastoid interferon-alpha were randomized to receive either ribavirin (800 mg/day) plus leucocytic interferon-alpha (3 mega units thrice weekly) or the same dose of interferon-alpha alone, for 6 months. Effects of therapy were evaluated by serum aminotransferase and hepatitis C virus RNA levels and control liver biopsies.

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, aminotransferase levels become normal in 9/26 patients receiving combination therapy (35% [confidence interval, 16% to 53%]) and in 2/24 receiving interferon-alpha alone (8% [confidence interval, -3% to 19%]) (p = 0.03). Aminotransferase normalization was never associated with hepatitis C virus RNA clearance. All patients with normal aminotransferase relapsed after discontinuation of therapy. At the end of treatment, mean hepatitis C virus RNA levels significantly decreased only in the group receiving combination therapy, but returned to pretreatment values 6 months thereafter. No histological improvement was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no indication for treatment with interferon-alpha at the dose of 3 mega units thrice weekly plus 800 mg/day of ribavirin for 6 months in chronic hepatitis C resistant to interferon-alpha.

Long-term follow-up of chronic hepatitis C patients with sustained virological response to alpha-interferon

BACKGROUND/AIMS

This study aimed to determine the long-term outcome of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients who respond to interferon treatment with clearance of serum HCV RNA.

METHODS

We performed a long-term biochemical, virological, and histological follow-up of all sustained virological responders, defined as those who became HCV RNA negative at follow-up 6 months after the end of treatment, from 3 controlled interferon trials performed in Sweden between 1988 and 1994.

RESULTS

At biochemical and virological long-term follow-up performed in 26 sustained virological responders 3.5-8.8 years (mean +/- SD, 5.4+/-1.6 years) after the end of IFN therapy, 22 patients (85%) had normal serum ALT levels, and 24 patients (92%) were HCV RNA negative in serum. Liver biopsies performed in 23 patients 2.1-8.7 years (mean +/- SD, 5.0+/-1.8 years) after end of treatment showed no or minimal inflammation, whereas mild and probably irreversible fibrosis was seen in a few patients.

CONCLUSION

In this well-defined material of sustained responders to IFN therapy, the long-term prognosis was excellent. Nearly all had a durable response, not only biochemically and virologically, but more importantly also histologically with normalisation or near normalisation of previous histological lesions.

Interferon-alpha-2B and ribavirin in combination for chronic hepatitis C patients not responding to interferon-alpha alone: an Italian multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of interferon (IFN)-alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients unresponsive to a previous treatment with IFN-alpha-2b alone.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized study in 303 CHC patients. One hundred fifty-two patients received subcutaneous administration of recombinant IFN-alpha-2b (3 MU thrice weekly) and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/daily per os), whereas 151 received IFN-alpha-2b alone (6 MU thrice weekly). Both ribavirin and IFN-alpha-2b were given for 24 wk, regardless of treatment response. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and HCV RNA titer were checked during the treatment period and for a further 24 wk.

RESULTS

Normal ALT levels were observed in 64.5% of the patients treated with IFN-alpha and ribavirin and in 22.6% of the patients treated with IFN-alpha alone. In the group of patients receiving IFN-alpha and ribavirin HCV RNA was not detectable in 40% of patients responders and remained undetectable in 44.2% of sustained responders. In the group of patients receiving IFN-alpha alone HCV RNA was not detectable in 24.2% of patients responders and remained not detectable in 33.3% of sustained responders.

CONCLUSIONS

A 24-wk treatment course with IFN-alpha and ribavirin given to patients with a previous lack of response to IFN-alpha alone offers a chance of a sustained biochemical and virological response, at least in a subset of such patients. The role of long-term therapy in inducing prolonged remission still remains to be explored.

Treatment of chronic viral hepatitis

Interferon-alpha therapy has proved effective for up to 40% of patients with adult-acquired chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and for 20-25% of those with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Nucleoside analogues, such as lamivudine and famciclovir, are showing promise as antiviral agents for chronic HBV and the combination of interferon-alpha and ribavirin is proving to be successful therapy for 40-50% of patients with chronic HCV. In this article we review current therapy and discuss future strategies of the therapy of chronic viral hepatitis.

Ribavirin monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a retrospective study of 95 patients

Ribavirin is a purine nucleoside that inhibits the replication of a variety of RNA viruses and was shown to have a transient efficacy in chronic hepatitis C during short-term therapy. We have analysed retrospectively its efficacy in 95 patients with liver biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C. Patients received oral ribavirin (600-1200 mg daily) for a mean duration of 11 months. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels returned to normal values in 38 patients (40%) and decreased by more than 50% in 20 other patients (21%). HCV RNA clearance from serum was observed in seven patients (8%). The biochemical response rate was higher in patients with chronic hepatitis (54%) than in those with cirrhosis (24%) (P = 0.003). Clearance of HCV RNA was observed in 10% of the patients with chronic hepatitis vs 4% of the patients with cirrhosis. In non-responders to interferon (IFN) therapy, ALT levels returned to normal values in 11 (26%) and HCV RNA became negative in one (2%), as compared to 48% and 3%, respectively, in those contraindicated for IFN. In 17 patients in whom paired liver biopsy specimens were available, the histology activity index (HAI) improved in 12. Therapy was generally well tolerated although 11 patients had to stop therapy because of side-effects, which were more common in cirrhotic patients. In conclusion, our results suggest that long-term administration of ribavirin is well tolerated and may be beneficial in controlling the progression of chronic hepatitis C. This may represent an alternative therapy in patients who have contraindications for interferon therapy or as a palliative approach in non-responders to IFN.

Re-treatment with interferon alfa of patients with chronic hepatitis C

Treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C has had limited success because of relapses and nonresponse to interferon alfa therapy (currently the only established therapeutic agent). A retrospective study was done to determine the efficacy of re-treatment with interferon and the predictors of response in patients who failed to achieve sustained response after one standard course of interferon therapy (3 million units three times a week for 24 weeks). One hundred and eleven patients (47 relapsers and 64 nonresponders), mean age 45 years, were included in the study. Eighteen relapsers and 13 nonresponders received a higher dose (5 MU), and 11 relapsers and 6 nonresponders received a longer duration (48 weeks) of interferon therapy. The remaining patients received the same regimen as the first treatment. Eighty-one percent and 23% of relapsers and nonresponders, respectively, had an end-of-treatment response, and 19% and 3% of the corresponding patient groups had a sustained response to re-treatment. Two patients with breakthrough during their first treatment were the only nonresponders with sustained response after re-treatment. Sustained response was observed only in patients who received an increased dose or duration of interferon therapy. No predictor of sustained response was found. In conclusion, sustained response to re-treatment with interferon was only observed with augmentation of dose or duration of therapy in some relapsers and patients who had breakthrough. Established predictors of response to interferon in naive patients, in particular serum hepatitis C virus RNA and genotype, were not associated with sustained response to re-treatment.

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interferon alpha-2b with and without ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C. The Swedish Study Group

BACKGROUND

Pilot studies suggested that more patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection had a sustained virological response when treated with the combination of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin than with interferon alpha-2b alone. We investigated the biochemical and virological responses and safety of treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin compared with interferon alpha-2b alone.

METHODS

In this double-blind trial 100 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with interferon alpha-2b (3 MU three times a week) in combination with ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg per day) or placebo for 24 weeks and then followed up for a further 24 weeks. A further follow-up was done 1 year after active treatment stopped. The primary endpoint was the sustained virological response, defined as no detectable HCV RNA by PCR at both week 24 and week 48. Retrospectively, the baseline HCV-RNA load was analysed as a predictor of a sustained virological response. Data were analysed by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

18 (36%) of the 50 patients in the interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin group had a sustained virological response compared with nine (18%) of the 50 patients in the interferon alpha-2b and placebo group (p = 0.047). At the 1 year follow-up the proportion of patients with a virological response was greater in the interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin group than the interferon alpha-2b and placebo group (42 vs 20%, p = 0.03), respectively. More patients with baseline HCV-RNA concentrations greater than 3 x 10(6) genome equivalents (Eq) per mL had a sustained response with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin than with interferon alpha-2b and placebo (12/29 vs 1/26, p = 0.009), whereas the sustained response did not differ between the two treatment groups for HCV-RNA amounts less than 3 x 10(6) Eq per mL (6/21 vs 8/24, p = 0.67), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

More patients with chronic hepatitis C have a sustained virological response with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin than with only interferon alpha-2b treatment. We suggest that patients with high HCV-RNA loads should be treated with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin.

[Therapy of hepatitis C]

The purpose of this review is an update of the therapy of hepatitis C especially with Interferon-alpha. From the large number of publications on this topic the established facts were worked out. Taking these facts as a base guidelines for the therapy in practical use were defined. In addition the aspects of therapeutic strategies of chronic hepatitis C which until now can not definitely be judged are discussed. In the relatively few patients in whom hepatitis C is diagnosed already in the acute phase, Interferon-alpha-treatment (3 x 3 million units 3 times a week) for 3 to 4 months increases the percentage of patients in whom HCV-RNA in the serum is eliminated. In patients with chronic hepatitis C, after decision finding for treatment, a standard scheme is recommended which consists of a monotherapy with recombinant Interferon-alpha. The dosage of Interferon-alpha is in the first 12 to 16 weeks 5 up to 6 million units given 3 times a week. For the further therapy 3 million units 3 times a week seems to be appropriate. The recommended duration of Interferon-alpha-therapy is 12 months. A long-term benefit of about 20% can be achieved in unselected groups of patients when judged on the permanent normalisation of serum transaminases and elimination of HCV-RNA in the serum. Important factors which may influence the probability of a sustained response, like HCV genotype, virus titer in serum, duration of the disease, high hepatic iron content and the presence of cirrhosis, are discussed. Up to now there exist no reliable guidelines in the case of a "no change" situation and for patients with a flare-up of inflammatory activity during or after therapy. Combination therapy of Interferon-alpha with other drugs like analogous of nucleotides (for example ribavarin), non steroidal antirheumatic drugs and ursodesoxycholic acid (UDCA) have still to be evaluated in controlled clinical trials.

A randomized controlled trial of high-dose maintenance interferon therapy in chronic hepatitis C

In chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, the rate of sustained response to interferon is low. We evaluated, in patients responding to a 26-week course of interferon, the effect of high-dose maintenance therapy in preventing relapse. Three hundred and ten patients with chronic HCV infection (38.3% with cirrhosis, 80.6% with HCV type 1) received interferon alfa-2b for 26 weeks (10 MU tiw for 8 weeks, then 5 MU tiw for 18 weeks). One hundred and twenty-four subjects (40%) normalized aminotransferases, and were allocated randomly either to continue on 5 MU tiw for a further 26 weeks (prolonged therapy group: 60 patients) or to stop interferon (brief therapy group: 64 patients). Fifty-two weeks after stopping interferon the overall sustained biochemical response rate was 13.2% (41/310). The number of patients with normal aminotransferases was comparable between the prolonged and brief therapy groups (30% vs. 35.9%, P = n.s.), and the rate of HCV-RNA clearance was similar (48.8% vs. 42.4%, P = n.s.). The timing of posttreatment relapse was not influenced by the duration of therapy. Fifty-nine patients (19%) did not complete therapy due to adverse effects. Multivariate analysis identified four features predicting sustained biochemical response in subjects normalizing aminotransferases under therapy: negative HCV-RNA at end of therapy, normal aminotransferases at 4 weeks of therapy, high baseline aminotransferases, and high baseline platelets. Infection with HCV type 1 was not a significant predictor of response, due to its high prevalence in our population (80.6%). It is concluded that in patients with chronic hepatitis C mostly infected by HCV type 1, a prolonged high-dose interferon course (900 MU over 52 weeks) did not increase the rate of sustained biochemical response and of HCV-RNA clearance in comparison to a brief course (510 MU over 26 weeks).

Prolonged therapy of chronic hepatitis C with ribavirin

Therapy with ribavirin for 6-12 months is associated with decreases in serum aminotransferases in some patients with chronic hepatitis C. We have assessed the practicality and safety of prolonged therapy with ribavirin. Six patients with chronic hepatitis C were given 1000-1200 mg of ribavirin daily for 24 months. Serum aminotransferases and hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels were monitored during and after therapy. Liver biopsies were carried out before and at the end of treatment. With therapy, mean serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels fell from 161 U/L to 45 U/L at 12 months and to 39 U/L at 24 months. HCV RNA levels did not change. Liver histology improved in five and was unchanged in one patient. When therapy was stopped, aminotransferases rose to pretreatment levels. Side effects included mild fatigue and headaches. Two patients developed gallstones during therapy, perhaps caused by the chronic haemolysis that occurred in all patients. In conclusion, prolonged therapy with ribavirin can result in sustained improvements in serum aminotransferases and hepatic histology in a proportion of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Ribavirin therapy does not cause decreases in viraemia and, therefore, probably must be continued indefinitely to provide lasting benefit. The advantages of such therapy must be weighed against possible long-term side-effects.

Efficacy and tolerance of alpha-2b interferon therapy on HCV infection of hemodialyzed patients

A high frequency (25%) of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies is observed in French hemodialyzed patients; this is associated with detectable viremia in 85% and results in chronic hepatitis in more than 90%. We conducted a pilot study to examine the tolerance and efficacy of alpha-2b Interferon therapy upon HCV infection in hemodialyzed patients. Nineteen anti-HCV positive hemodialyzed patients were given a standard alpha-2b interferon regimen (3 megaunits subcutaneously three times weekly, following each hemodialysis) over six months as a treatment of biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis (N = 16) or acute hepatitis (N = 3). Thirteen of these 19 had increased levels of aminotransferase at the time of treatment. Serum HCV RNA was tested qualitatively and quantitatively by the polymerase chain reaction and the bDNA test, respectively, at the beginning and at the end of antiviral treatment, and a third time at least six months after the end of therapy (mean follow-up 18 +/- 9 months). HCV genotype was determined in the 15 patients who had detectable HCV RNA before treatment. The biological response (long-term response, relapse or non-response) was defined as usual according to the serum aminotransferase levels during therapy and at least six months after. A post-treatment liver biopsy, allowing comparison with semiquantitative pathological scores, was performed in 14 patients. Only one of the 19 treated patients did not complete therapy because of poor tolerance, while 18 of the 19 fairly tolerated a complete six month course of alpha-2b interferon.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Combined treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients with a previous non-response or non-sustained response to interferon alone

Ten patients with chronic hepatitis C, six of whom had not responded and four of whom had responded in a non-sustained fashion to interferon-alpha treatment alone, were given interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination during 24 weeks. Interferon alpha-2b was given subcutaneously, at a dose of 3 MU thrice weekly, together with ribavirin orally, at a dose of 1,000-1,200 mg/day. All four patients with a prior non-sustained response to interferon alone had normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels at the end of treatment as well as during follow-up (> or = 24 weeks post treatment). Furthermore, all four lost serum HCV-RNA at the end of treatment and three continued to be negative during follow-up. Among patients with a prior non-response to interferon alone three of six had normal ALT levels at the end of treatment and one at follow-up. Two of six became HCV-RNA negative at cessation of treatment, one of whom was negative also at follow-up. All former non-sustained responders and one of six non-responder patients thus showed a sustained biochemical response with eradication of HCV-RNA from serum in all cases but one. It is concluded that combination therapy with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin offers a chance of sustained biochemical response with eradication of the viremia in patients who have not shown a persistent response to interferon-alpha alone.

Alpha interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus infection is a common disease with a high propensity to progress towards chronicity. Alpha interferon has been proposed to halt progression of the disease and prevent the development of more severe liver diseases such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Unfortunately, less than 20% of treated patients show a long-lasting ALT normalization and HCV-RNA negativity. Factors which might be predictive of a long term response to interferon are debated. Univariate analysis of data collected in randomized clinical studies, has shown that IFN dose, age, duration of disease, cirrhosis and early response (primary) to IFN were all predictors of a sustained response to IFN, but with differences in different studies. When data were analyzed by a multivariate analysis, short duration of the disease and absence of cirrhosis were found to predict long-term response to interferon. Finally, many evidences indicate that response rates to therapy may be better in patients with low pretreatment levels of HCV-RNA measured either by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or the branched-DNA assay (b-DNA).