Effects of captopril on renal function in patients with cirrhosis and ascites

From congestive hepatopathy to hepatocellular carcinoma, how can we improve patient management?

Heart failure and liver disease often coexist because of systemic disorders and diseases that affect both organs as well as complex cardio-hepatic interactions. Heart failure can cause acute or chronic liver injury due to ischaemia and passive venous congestion, respectively. Congestive hepatopathy is frequently observed in patients with congenital heart disease and after the Fontan procedure, but also in older patients with chronic heart failure. As congestive hepatopathy can evolve into cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, screening for liver injury should be performed in patients with chronic cardiac diseases and after Fontan surgery. Fibrosis starts in the centro-lobular zone and will extend progressively to the portal area. Chronic liver injury can be reversible if heart function improves. However, in the case of terminal heart failure, uncontrolled by medical resources or by assistive device support, the combination of heart and liver transplants must be discussed in patients with chronic advanced liver fibrosis. In this review of the literature, we will focus on congestive hepatopathy and its complications, such as liver fibrosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, with the aim of improving the management and surveillance of patients experiencing these complications.

Hepato-cardiac disorders

Understanding the mutual relationship between the liver and the heart is important for both hepatologists and cardiologists. Hepato-cardiac diseases can be classified into heart diseases affecting the liver, liver diseases affecting the heart, and conditions affecting the heart and the liver at the same time. Differential diagnoses of liver injury are extremely important in a cardiologist’s clinical practice calling for collaboration between cardiologists and hepatologists due to the many other diseases that can affect the liver and mimic haemodynamic injury. Acute and chronic heart failure may lead to acute ischemic hepatitis or chronic congestive hepatopathy. Treatment in these cases should be directed to the primary heart disease. In patients with advanced liver disease, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy may develop including hemodynamic changes, diastolic and systolic dysfunctions, reduced cardiac performance and electrophysiological abnormalities. Cardiac evaluation is important for patients with liver diseases especially before and after liver transplantation. Liver transplantation may lead to the improvement of all cardiac changes and the reversal of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. There are systemic diseases that may affect both the liver and the heart concomitantly including congenital, metabolic and inflammatory diseases as well as alcoholism. This review highlights these hepatocardiac diseases

Liver abnormalities in cardiac diseases and heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is characterized by the inability of systemic perfusion to meet the body's metabolic demands and is usually caused by cardiac pump dysfunction and may occasionally present with symptoms of a noncardiac disorder such as hepatic dysfunction. The primary pathophysiology involved in hepatic dysfunction from HF is either passive congestion from increased filling pressures or low cardiac output and the consequences of impaired perfusion. Passive hepatic congestion due to increased central venous pressure may cause elevations of liver enzymes and both direct and indirect serum bilirubin. Impaired perfusion from decreased cardiac output may be associated with acute hepatocellular necrosis with marked elevations in serum aminotransferases. Cardiogenic ischemic hepatitis ("shock liver") may ensue following an episode of profound hypotension in patients with acute HF. We discuss pathophysiology and identification of liver abnormalities that are commonly seen in patients with HF.

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in liver fibrosis

Hepatic fibrosis, which is characterized by progressive inflammation and deposition of extracellular matrix components, is a common response to chronic liver disease. Hepatic fibrogenesis is a dynamic process that involves several liver cell types including hepatic stellate cells and Kupffer cells. In addition, recent evidence indicates that bile duct epithelial cells (i.e. cholangiocytes) also participate in the progression of biliary fibrosis that is observed during chronic cholestatic liver diseases, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis. To date, there are no effective treatments for hepatic fibrosis. Several recent studies have demonstrated that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a key role in hepatic fibrosis. Therapies targeting the RAS may represent a promising paradigm for the prevention and treatment of hepatic fibrosis in the setting of chronic liver disease. In this review, we provide a comprehensive update on the role of RAS in the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis in both animal models and human studies. We will discuss the profibrotic mechanisms activated by the RAS and the cell types involved. Studies that have utilized angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors to modulate the RAS in order to ameliorate hepatic fibrosis will also be discussed. Although the cumulative evidence supports the potential for the use of ARBs and ACE inhibitors as treatment for hepatic fibrosis, extensive studies of the effectiveness of RAS therapeutics are necessary in patients with chronic liver disease.

Hepatorenal syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Renal failure in cirrhosis is a common complication that is associated with poor survival. A rapid diagnosis of the cause of renal failure is mandatory because it is associated with prognosis.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers the differential diagnosis between hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) and other causes of renal failure, as well as the difficulty in making a correct diagnosis, caused by the differentiation between hepatorenal syndrome and acute tubular necrosis. This review also discusses the multifactorial mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of HRS. The paper provides diagnostic algorithms to use in clinical practice, emphasized by the fact that some patients may have HRS superimposed on pre-existent renal failure.

EXPERT OPINION

The correct diagnosis of renal failure is essential to initiate the correct treatment of this complication. In patients with HRS type 1, treatment with vasopressin and albumin is the treatment of choice; however, 50% of patients do not respond to this treatment.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in the reduction of portal pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone antagonists [ACE inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), aldosterone antagonists (AA)] are potential therapies for portal hypertension. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of RAAS inhibitors in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction.

METHODS

We included full-text controlled trials in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. The primary outcome was mean change in HVPG between treatment and control. Two independent reviewers performed trial selection and quality assessment. An individual patient meta-analysis based on the data of three studies was performed.

RESULTS

From 193 citations, 19 controlled trials (n=678) were included. When compared to placebo, ARB/ACEi resulted in significant HVPG reduction. The best quality trials compared ARB/ACEi to beta-blockers (BB). Pooled individual patient data for three of four of these trials showed that BB decreased the HVPG more than ARB/ACEi. In patients with Child Pugh A cirrhosis, the HVPG reduction with ARB/ACEi (-17%; 95% CI: -28 to -6), was similar to that of BB (-21%; 95% CI: -32 to -9). Significant variation in the comparison groups of AA trials precluded pooling. There was no difference in adverse events in any group but selected studies noted adverse hemodynamic effects in decompensated patients on ARB/ACEi.

CONCLUSIONS

ARB/ACEi reduce portal pressure in patients with Child Pugh A cirrhosis without adverse events. The efficacy and safety in this group may be secondary to a targeted effect on the local hepatic RAAS system, as compared to decompensated patients who risk hypotension and renal insufficiency due to activation of the systemic RAAS. Further studies should determine the potential of these drugs as an alternative or adjunct to BB.

Liver disease and the renin-angiotensin system: recent discoveries and clinical implications

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a key regulator of vascular resistance, sodium and water homeostasis and the response to tissue injury. Historically, angiotensin II (Ang II) was thought to be the primary effector peptide of this system. Ang II is produced predominantly by the effect of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) on angiotensin I (Ang I). Ang II acts mainly through the angiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT(1)) and, together with ACE, these components represent the 'classical' axis of the RAS. Drug therapies targeting the RAS by inhibiting Ang II formation (ACE inhibitors) or binding to its receptor (angiotensin receptor blockers) are now in widespread clinical use and have been shown to reduce tissue injury and fibrosis in cardiac and renal disease independently of their effects on blood pressure. In 2000, two groups using different methodologies identified a homolog of ACE, called ACE2, which cleaves Ang II to form the biologically active heptapeptide, Ang-(1-7). Conceptually, ACE2, Ang-(1-7), and its putative receptor, the mas receptor represent an 'alternative' axis of the RAS capable of opposing the often deleterious actions of Ang II. Interestingly, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers increase Ang-(1-7) production and it has been proposed that some of the beneficial effects of these drugs are mediated through upregulation of Ang-(1-7) rather than inhibition of Ang II production or receptor binding. The present review focuses on the novel components and pathways of the RAS with particular reference to their potential contribution towards the pathophysiology of liver disease.

Effects of sympathetic nerves and angiotensin II on renal sodium and water handling in rats with common bile duct ligature

We tested the hypothesis that angiotensin II is likely to be mandatory for the neurogenic sodium and volume retention in cirrhotic rats with common bile duct ligature (BDL) following an acute volume load. To assess the neural control of volume homeostasis, 21 days after common BDL rats underwent volume expansion (0.9% NaCL; 10% body wt over 30 min) to decrease renal sympathetic nerve activity. Untreated animals, rats with renal denervation or pretreated with a nonhypotensive dose of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist were studied. The renal renin-angiotensin system was assessed by immunohistochemistry and RT-PCR. Rats with BDL excreted only 71 ± 4% of the administered volume load. In cirrhotic rats pretreated with an angiotensin II AT1inhibitor or after renal denervation, these values ranged significantly higher from 98 to 103% ( P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Renal sympathetic nerve activity decreases by volume expansion were impaired in BDL rats ( P < 0.05) but unaffected by angiotensin II receptor inhibition. In kidneys of BDL animals, renin mRNA was increased, and immunohistochemistry revealed increased staining for peritubular angiotensin II. Renal denervation in BDL animals reduced renin expression within 5 days to control levels. In conclusion, the impaired excretion of an acute volume load in rats with liver cirrhosis is due to effects of an increased renal sympathetic nerve activity that are likely to be dependent on intrarenal angiotensin II and renin. We speculate that similar changes may contribute to long-term volume retention in liver cirrhosis.

Effects of contrast media on renal function in patients with cirrhosis: a prospective study

Patients with cirrhosis are frequently submitted to radiological procedures that require the administration of contrast media. Contrast media is a well-known cause of renal failure, particularly in the presence of some predisposing conditions. However, it is not known whether cirrhosis constitutes a risk factor for contrast media-induced renal failure. The aim of this study was to assess the possible nephrotoxicity of contrast media in patients with cirrhosis. In a first protocol, renal function was evaluated with sensitive methods (glomerular filtration rate using iothalamate I 125 clearance and renal plasma flow using iodohippurate I 131 clearance) before and 48 hours after the administration of contrast media in 31 patients with cirrhosis (20 with ascites, 5 with renal failure). Solute-free water clearance, urine sodium, prostaglandins, and markers of tubular damage were also measured. The administration of contrast media was not associated with significant changes in renal function tests, neither in the whole group of patients nor in patients with ascites or renal failure. Urinary prostaglandin E2 and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase increased significantly, but sodium and solute-free water excretion remained unchanged. In a second protocol, a different series of 60 patients with cirrhosis and renal failure were examined prospectively. No patient had renal failure due to contrast media. Only in 1 patient with septic shock was contrast media a possible contributing factor. In conclusion, the administration of contrast media is not associated with adverse effects on renal function in patients with cirrhosis. Cirrhosis does not appear to be a risk factor for the development of contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity.

Inappropriately low angiotensin II generation: a factor determining reduced kidney function and survival in patients with decompensated cirrhosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Angiotensin II contributes to the post-glomerular arteriolar vasoconstriction which maintains the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in renal hypoperfusion. To explore whether depressed angiotensin II generation, due to reduced angiotensinogen production or low angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels, could impair kidney function in advanced cirrhosis.

METHODS

We studied and prospectively followed up 21 diuretic-free ascitic cirrhotic patients, through these determinations: plasma levels of active renin (AR), renin activity (PRA), angiotensin II, ACE and aldosterone; renal clearances of sodium, inulin and para-aminohippurate; antipyrine clearance. Fifteen healthy subjects were also studied.

RESULTS

GFR distribution was bimodal, 10 patients had low GFR values (l-GFR group) and 11 had normal-GFR values (n-GFR group) (below and above 105 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) body surface area). Antipyrine clearance and Child-Pugh score did not differ in the two patient groups. l-GFR group had higher AR and PRA values, lower ACE levels and a significantly higher AR/Angiotensin II ratio than n-GFR group (all P<0.01). All 21 patients showed increased values of the AR/PRA ratio, i.e. subnormal angiotensinogen levels (P<0.03). The 18-month survival rates of l-GFR and n-GFR groups were 20 and 81% (P<0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-GFR cirrhotic patients had a worse survival rate associated with more severe contraction of the effective arterial blood volume, higher AR/Angiotensin II ratio and lower ACE levels.

Liver and kidney diseases

The spectrum of renal disease in patients with liver disease is expanding. The recognition of renal complications of liver diseases is essential in the management of these patients. As liver transplantation is a treatment option for many patients with chronic liver disease, the presence of renal complications impacts the decision regarding transplantation and influences the course of these patients after transplantation, especially with regard to the use of immunosuppressive therapy. The involvement of the liver and kidney in systemic conditions is common and adds to the morbidity and mortality of patients.

Ascites and hepatorenal syndrome

Ascites is a frequent complication of chronic liver disease with severe portal hypertension. Moreover, in the presence of tense ascites, renal dysfunction and hepatorenal syndrome may occur. Unfortunately, there is no explanation that thoroughly describes the complex relationship between the liver and kidney in either physiological or pathological conditions. Nevertheless, available evidence indicates that early sodium and water retention precedes decompensation, characterized by hyperdynamic circulation. The best approach to the treatment of these patients should be aimed at the prevention of ascites formation. An accurate sequential treatment is indicated in patients with ascites. In the case of hepatorenal syndrome, the only definitive approach is liver transplantation.

Changes in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow in cirrhotic rats during converting enzyme inhibition

During the development of cirrhosis ascites-edema, peripheral vasodilatation, hypotension and an increase of the plasma concentration of several neurohormones are frequently observed. Such complex changes in the hormonal profile hinders the assessment of the relative role of each in the pathophysiology of this disease. The purpose of this work was to evaluate in a rat model of experimental cirrhosis (phenobarbital/CCl4) the role of the renin-angiotensin system in the pre-ascitic stage of the disease using the converting enzyme inhibitor captopril. Cirrhotic rats showed diminished renal and hepatic perfusion. Compared to normal rats, glomerular filtration rate in cirrhotic rats was reduced from 0.75 +/- 0.11 to 0.42 +/- 0.06 mL/min/100 g BW, and renal plasma flow was reduced from 2.37 +/- 0.28 to 1.58 +/- 0.16 mL/min/100 g BW; the indocyanine green slope changed from -0.095 +/- 0.028 to -0.057 +/- 0.01; the plasma sodium concentration fell from 144 +/- 1.5 to 131 +/- 5.40 mEq/L (all < .05). The mean arterial pressure was not reduced in the cirrhotic rats. There was no ascites. Both the acute (25 mg i.v.) and chronic (25 mg i.p. daily plus 25 mg/L in drinking water) administration of captopril to cirrhotic rats induced an increase in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow along with a steeper slope in indocyanine green decay (p < .05 for all three parameters) when compared to non-treated cirrhotic animals. No changes were observed in controls. In the balance studies, an increase in urinary volume along with a decrease in urinary osmolality was recorded in cirrhotic rats on chronic captopril treatment. In conclusion, our results show an activation of the renin-angiotensin system in these rats, as disclosed by the inhibition of the converting enzyme, as well as a possible interaction with ADH.

Renal and hormonal responses to repeated treatment with enalapril in non-azotemic cirrhosis with ascites

Since a single dose of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril was shown to cause natriuresis in cirrhosis in a previous study, we investigated whether repeated doses of this substance would sustain a favorable renal effect in cirrhosis. Ten milligrams of enalapril maleate were administered once a day for 8 days to ten patients with non-azotemic cirrhosis and ascites. Enalapril reduced blood pressure significantly at 4 to 12 h (systolic blood pressure) and 2, 6, and 8 h (diastolic blood pressure) on day 2, compared to pretreatment (day 0) values, but this depressor effect decreased on day 8. No change in heart rate could be detected. Enalapril significantly suppressed serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and plasma aldosterone concentration (p < 0.001 to 0.01), which were elevated prior to treatment, with pretreatment values of 25.8 +/- 1.8 IU/l for serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity and 241 +/- 67 pg/ml for plasma aldosterone concentration. This drug caused a 12 to 24% increase (p < 0.05 to 0.01) in mean daily urinary volume and a 40 to 54% increase (p < 0.001 to 0.01) in mean daily urinary sodium excretion from the respective pretreatment baselines during the 8-day period. Creatinine clearance was improved (p < 0.05) by the treatment, with mean improvement values from 24 to 34% above the pretreatment value of 47.4 +/- 4.3 ml/min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effects of low-dose captopril on renal hemodynamics and function in patients with cirrhosis of the liver

BACKGROUND

In cirrhotic patients with ascites, captopril has deleterious effects on renal function, which have been referred to as captopril-induced arterial hypotension. The effects of this drug on renal function in cirrhosis were evaluated using low-dose captopril, thereby avoiding any change in arterial pressure.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over trial, the effects of 12.5 mg captopril on renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate (measured by radioisotopic techniques), and sodium excretion in healthy controls and cirrhotic patients with and without ascites were determined.

RESULTS

In healthy subjects, captopril only induced a significant, 18% increase in renal plasma flow. In contrast, glomerular filtration rate significantly decreased in patients with (from 108 +/- 7 to 78 +/- 9 mL/min) and without ascites (from 102 +/- 4 to 88 +/- 3 mL/min), whereas renal plasma flow did not change. Urinary sodium excretion also significantly decreased in ascitic patients (from 43.8 +/- 4.4 to 30.6 +/- 3.8 mumol/min).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that angiotensin II contributes to maintain renal hemodynamics in cirrhosis with and without ascites.

Efficacy of low-dose captopril in addition to furosemide and spironolactone in patients with decompensated liver disease during blunted diuresis

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is activated by diuretics and involved in the diuretic resistance of cirrhotic patients with ascites and oedema. In previous studies relatively high doses of captopril (25-400 mg daily) were unsuccessful in promoting diuresis and natriuresis in these patients. We analyzed the efficacy of a low dose of captopril in eight patients with massive ascites resistant to therapy of salt/fluid restriction and increasing doses of spironolactone and furosemide. Mean duration of diuretic use was 73 days (range 7-240 days). After at least 3 days of observation on 80 mg furosemide and 100 mg spironolactone only, captopril was added. Four out of eight patients responded with an increase in natriuresis and diuresis; daily dose of captopril was 20.6 mg in responders and 26.5 mg in non-responders. After the addition of captopril the mean weight change was -7.5 kg in responders and +0.25 kg in non-responders. Mean urinary sodium output in responders increased from 72.8 (S.D. = 35.2) to 128.5 (63.5) mmol within 10 days. Increased diuresis in responders made diuretic reduction necessary: mean furosemide from 80 to 53.3 mg, and mean spironolactone from 100 to 68.1 mg. Creatinine clearances remained stable. High levels of plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone and angiotensin-II were found in all patients. Non-responders showed more severe hyponatremia and higher vasopressin levels. Natriuretic atrial factor (NAF) was in the upper-normal range or slightly elevated in both groups. In non-responders we noticed low levels of cGMP in 24-h urine, compared with responders.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Effect of captopril therapy on sodium and water excretion in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites]

Ascites in patients with cirrhosis of the liver frequently is refractory to diuretic treatment. It was postulated that vasoconstriction of the renal cortex, mediated by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS), may be one course of the disturbed sodium- and water-excretion in these patients. We therefore investigated in 14 cirrhotic patients with ascites under constant diuretic treatment the effects of low-dose captopril therapy on urinary sodium- and potassium-excretion, body weight, abdominal girth, serum-sodium, -potassium, creatinine-clearance, plasma-renin-activity (PRA), plasma-aldosterone (PA) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). After a control period of 4 days the patients received 2 x 6.25 mg/d captopril for 5 days and 4 x 6.25 mg/d for further 5 days. Treatment was followed by a second control period without captopril. PRA increased significantly after 2 days of captopril treatment. 2 x 6.25 mg/d captopril induced a significant increase in sodium excretion and a significant decrease of body weight. MAP decreased slightly but significantly without clinical signs of hypotension. 4 x 6.25 mg/d captopril resulted in a further reduction of body weight and a further enhancement of sodium excretion. Three days after withdrawal of captopril sodium output was significantly reduced again.

CONCLUSION

In cirrhotic patients low-dose captopril seems to be efficient in the treatment of ascites resistant to diuretics without causing major side effects.