Cholinesterase-producing hepatocellular carcinoma

Effects of organophosphates on precision-cut kidney slices

Organophosphate (OP) poisoning, both accidental and with suicidal intent, is a global medical challenge. While the primary toxicity of these pesticides is based on the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), case reports describe patients developing OP-mediated renal insufficiency. We set out to investigate possible pathomechanisms utilizing rat precision-cut kidney slices (PCKS). Depending on the method of investigation, PCKS were observed for a maximum of 10 days. PCKS exposed to OP compounds (malaoxon, malathion, paraoxon, parathion) showed a dose-dependent loss of viability and a reduction of total protein content over the course of 10 days. A concentration of 500 µM OP showed the most differences between OP compounds. After two days of incubation parathion showed a significantly lower level of viability than malathion. The respective effects of paraoxon and malaoxon were not significantly different from the control. However, effects of OP were only observed in concentrations exceeding those that were needed to achieve significant AChE inhibition in rat kidney tissue. In addition, we observed histological changes, without inducing LDH leakage. Overall, results suggest that OP exert effects in kidney tissue, that exceed those expected from the sole inhibition of AChE and vary between compounds. Without signs of necrosis, findings call for studies that address other possible pathomechanisms, including inflammatory response, oxidative stress or activation of apoptosis to further understand the nephrotoxicity of OP compounds. Monitoring oxon concentration over time, we demonstrated reduced enzyme-inhibiting properties in the presence of PCKS, suggesting interactions between OP compound and kidney tissue.

Expression of cholinesterases in human kidney and its variation in renal cell carcinoma types

Despite the aberrant expression of cholinesterases in tumours, the question of their possible contribution to tumorigenesis remains unsolved. The identification in kidney of a cholinergic system has paved the way to functional studies, but details on renal cholinesterases are still lacking. To fill the gap and to determine whether cholinesterases are abnormally expressed in renal tumours, paired pieces of normal kidney and renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) were compared for cholinesterase activity and mRNA levels. In studies with papillary RCC (pRCC), conventional RCC, chromophobe RCC, and renal oncocytoma, acetylcholinesterase activity increased in pRCC (3.92 ± 3.01 mU·mg(-1), P = 0.031) and conventional RCC (2.64 ± 1.49 mU·mg(-1), P = 0.047) with respect to their controls (1.52 ± 0.92 and 1.57 ± 0.44 mU·mg(-1)). Butyrylcholinesterase activity increased in pRCC (5.12 ± 2.61 versus 2.73 ± 1.15 mU·mg(-1), P = 0.031). Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked acetylcholinesterase dimers and hydrophilic butyrylcholinesterase tetramers predominated in control and cancerous kidney. Acetylcholinesterase mRNAs with exons E1c and E1e, 3'-alternative T, H and R acetylcholinesterase mRNAs and butyrylcholinesterase mRNA were identified in kidney. The levels of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase mRNAs were nearly 1000-fold lower in human kidney than in colon. Whereas kidney and renal tumours showed comparable levels of acetylcholinesterase mRNA, the content of butyrylcholinesterase mRNA was increased 10-fold in pRCC. The presence of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase mRNAs in kidney supports their synthesis in the organ itself, and the prevalence of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored acetylcholinesterase explains the splicing to acetylcholinesterase-H mRNA. The consequences of butyrylcholinesterase upregulation for pRCC growth are discussed.

Hepatitis B virus resistance to lamivudine and its clinical implications

Lamivudine is the first orally available drug approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis B, but hepatitis B virus (HBV) resistance to lamivudine appears to be a sine qua non in the therapy of HBV. The mutations at the FLLA and YMDD motif in the domains B and C of HBV polymerase contribute to this resistance. These mutations are found at codon (or AA) rtL180M and rtM204V/I in the reverse transcriptase (RT) domain of the HBV polymerase for all genotypes according to a new standardized RT domain numbering system. The resistant HBV may be less replication-competent in vitro and in vivo, and it is rarely associated with markedly increased HBV replication or liver injury. Therefore, certain physicians favour continuing lamivudine therapy even after emergence of HBV resistance with the expectation of maintaining lower-than baseline HBV DNA, alanine amino-transferase, and histological improvement, and avoiding reversion to wild-type HBV until additional antiviral strategies are developed. Ultimately, once several antiviral agents are approved, combination strategy is likely to be incorporated in antiviral treatment for chronic HBV to suppress, prevent or minimize the emergence of resistant virus.

Clinical potential of emerging new agents in hepatitis B

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B is directed at interrupting the natural history and clinical outcomes of the disease. It needs to take into account the virology and replication cycle of the hepatitis B virus (HBV), and the host immune response to HBV. Long term follow-up of patients treated with interferon supports the paradigm that a sustained, major suppression of HBV replication, particularly that associated with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion, interrupts the natural history of hepatitis B. The availability of potent but well tolerated and orally available HBV antivirals, of which lamivudine is the prototype, has allowed clearer treatment objectives to be formulated. These are: temporary or permanent reduction of hepatitis (necroinflammatory) activity, arrest of fibrotic progression, prevention of cirrhosis and liver failure, and prevention of recurrent HBV infection after liver transplantation. Lamivudine has good medium term efficacy in achieving each of these objectives. The only significant problem for the longer term is emergence of antiviral resistance conferred by mutations in the YMDD (tyrosine-methionine-aspartic acid-aspartic acid) motif of the HBV reverse transcriptase. As a result, contentious issues remain about defining when antiviral therapy is indicated, whether to treat for a defined interval or indefinitely, and when to stop treatment if HBeAg seroconversion is not achieved. Some personal views are expressed in this review. Among newer HBV antivirals in clinical studies, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir and emtricitabine appear to be at least as potent as lamivudine in suppressing HBV replication. Famciclovir appears less potent. In vitro studies show that YMDD mutations confer cross-resistance between lamivudine, emtricitabine and beta-L-Fd4C (L-2',3'-didehydro-dideoxy-5-fluorocytidine). However, adefovir dipivoxil, lobucavir, entecavir, DAPD (beta-D-2,6-diaminopurine dioxolane) and possibly clevudine (L-FMAU) suppress replication of YMDD mutant HBV, as well as wildtype. Preliminary studies indicate clinical efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil once resistance to lamivudine has developed. Immunomodulatory approaches to treatment of chronic hepatitis B are conceptually attractive, but newer agents used to date (thymalfasin, interleukin-12, therapeutic vaccines) have not demonstrated sufficient efficacy for widespread use. The next challenge for HBV treatment is to use antivirals in combination and/or in cyclical therapy to reduce the emergence of drug resistance and increase efficacy, particularly to achieve sustainable post-treatment suppression of hepatitis B.