Staging small cell lung cancer: Veterans Administration Lung Study Group versus International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer--what limits limited disease?

Phase II Randomized Study of Maintenance Atezolizumab Versus Atezolizumab Plus Talazoparib in Patients With SLFN11 Positive Extensive-Stage SCLC: S1929

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the addition of a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib to maintenance immune checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab after frontline chemoimmunotherapy improved outcomes in patients with Schlafen 11 (SLFN11)-positive extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed SLFN11 expressing (H-score ≥ 1, evaluated centrally) ES-SCLC were randomized to maintenance atezolizumab (A) versus atezolizumab plus talazoparib (AT) after frontline chemotherapy plus atezolizumab. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) using a one-sided 10% level stratified log-rank test. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, overall survival, and toxicity. The target sample size was 84 eligible patients.

RESULTS

From June 15, 2020, to December 15, 2022, 106 eligible patients were randomized (54 to AT and 52 to A). Progression-free survival was improved with AT versus A (hazard ratio = 0.66, 80% confidence interval: 0.50-0.86, one-sided p = 0.019) with a median PFS of 2.9 and 2.4 months; overall survival was not different between groups (hazard ratio = 0.98, 80% confidence interval: 0.71-1.36, one-sided p = 0.47). Grade 3 and higher non-hematologic treatment-related adverse events occurred in 17% of patients with AT and 14% of patients with A. Grade 3 and higher hematological treatment-related adverse events were more common in AT (50%) than in A (4%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Maintenance AT improved PFS in patients with SLFN11-positive ES-SCLC that did not progress after initial chemo-immunotherapy. Hematologic toxicity, primarily grade 3 anemia, was increased with AT, as expected. Prospective biomarker selection was demonstrated, paving the way for future evaluation of novel therapies in molecularly defined SCLC populations.

β-elemene inhibits tumor-promoting in small cell lung cancer by affecting M2 macrophages and TGF-β

OBJECTIVE

M2 macrophages have been implicated in promoting tumor growth and metastasis in various cancers, including small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study investigated the role of M2 macrophages in SCLC progression and explored the therapeutic potential of β-elemene, a natural compound, in modulating M2 macrophage-mediated tumor promotion.

METHODS

We differentiated THP-1 monocytes into M2 macrophages using PMA (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate), IL-4 (interleukin-4), and IL-13 (interleukin-13). M2 macrophages were co-cultured with the SCLC cell line NCI-H209, and CCK-8, Transwell, and flow cytometry assays were performed. TGF-β expression levels were detected by ELISA. M2 macrophages and NCI-H209 co-cultured cells were treated with β-elemene, or M2 macrophages were transfected with TGF-β shRNA lentivirus, and then co-cultured with NCI-H209 cells. Flow cytometry was used to analyze cell apoptosis. Immunofluorescence staining was performed to assess TGF-β expression.

RESULTS

Our findings demonstrate that M2 macrophages significantly enhance the viability, proliferation, and migration of SCLC cells, and this effect is associated with increased TGF-β expression in SCLC cells co-cultured with M2 macrophages. Furthermore, β-elemene treatment significantly reduced the migration and viability of SCLC cells co-cultured with M2 macrophages. Silencing TGF-β expression in M2 macrophages also suppressed SCLC cell proliferation and migration, suggesting that β-elemene may inhibit the pro-tumorigenic effects of M2 macrophages in SCLC by modulating TGF-β signaling. Immunofluorescence staining revealed that β-elemene treatment significantly reduced TGF-β levels in SCLC cells co-cultured with M2 macrophages, supporting the hypothesis that β-elemene exerts its antitumor activity by modulating the TGF-β pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that β-elemene has the potential to suppress SCLC development by modulating M2 macrophages and the TGF-β, offering a new therapeutic avenue and potential drug candidate for SCLC treatment.

Multimodality Therapy and Survival Outcomes in Resectable Primary Small Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Currently, optimal treatment strategy for resectable primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSmCCE) remains controversial. To address this, we conducted a multicenter study to evaluate treatment patterns and long-term survival of PSmCCE patients who underwent radical resection.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study included resected PSmCCE patients who received radical resection at seven high-volume cancer centers. Overall survival (OS) and median survival time (MST) were calculated by using a Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was utilized to assess differences. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 352 patients with resected PSmCCE were included. For PSmCCE with stage cT1-2N0M0, patients who received surgery plus adjuvant therapy showed better survival than those who received surgery alone (5-year OS rate: 32.8% vs. 19.2%, MST: 44.0 vs. 33.0 months, P = 0.035). Multivariable Cox survival analysis revealed an independent correlation between receiving surgery plus adjuvant therapy and improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.529; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.280-0.997; P = 0.049). For stage cT3N0M0/T1-3N1M0 PSmCCE, patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery had superior long-term survival compared with those who received surgery combined with adjuvant therapy and those who received surgery alone (5-year OS rate: 27.2% vs. 9.5% vs. 0%, MST: 36.0 vs. 24.0 vs. 20.0 months, P = 0.014). Multivariable Cox survival analysis showed that neoadjuvant therapy was independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.384, 95% CI 0.203-0.728; HR 0.550, 95% CI 0.312-0.968; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival in stage cT1-2N0M0 PSmCCE, but this should be confirmed in prospective studies. For stage cT3N0M0/T1-3N1M0 cases, neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery should be considered.

Preoperative immunochemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with stage I-IIIB small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To date, there remains a paucity of comparative investigations pertaining to preoperative immunochemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy in the context of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) patients. This study conducted a comprehensive comparative assessment concerning the safety and efficacy profiles of preoperative immunochemotherapy and chemotherapy in individuals diagnosed with stage I-IIIB SCLC.

METHODS

This investigation collected 53 consecutive patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC spanning stage I to IIIB who underwent preoperative immunochemotherapy or conventional chemotherapy at our hospital from January 2019 to July 2021. Patients were allocated to receive 2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy, with each cycle lasting three weeks. Comprehensive analyses encompassed baseline characteristics, clinical staging, tumor response, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and the assessment of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs). The follow-up period is extended for a minimum of one year after surgery. The primary endpoint embraced the evaluation of the pathological response [major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete remission (pCR)], while secondary endpoints encompassed objective response rate (ORR), trAEs, surgical resection rates, and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

The objective response rate of the immunochemotherapy group was 89.5%, while that of the chemotherapy group was 75.0% (P = 0.206). A total of 19 patients underwent surgery among these 53 patients, with 14 patients in the neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy group and 5 patients in the chemotherapy group. And the surgical resection rate of the immunochemotherapy group was 48.3% (14/29), which was higher than the chemotherapy group (20.8%, 5/24, P = 0.038). The rate of MPR in the immunochemotherapy group was 57.1% (8/14) and 40.0% (2/5) in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.891). The rates of pCR in the immunochemotherapy and chemotherapy group were 50.0% (7/14) and 0.0% (0/5), respectively (P = 0.106).The median DFS for both groups were not reached (P = 0.43). The 2-year DFS rate was 21.4% for the immunochemotherapy group versus 40.0% for the chemotherapy group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events between the immunochemotherapy group and the chemotherapy group.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with stage I-IIIB SCLC, neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is feasible and safe. Although immunochemotherapy did not significantly associated with longer DFS versus chemotherapy alone in patients with stage I-IIIB SCLC, it can produce significant downstaging and increase the possibility of surgery.

Pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: the molecular landscape, therapeutic challenges, and diagnosis and management strategies

Lung neuroendocrine neoplasms are a group of diverse, heterogeneous tumours that range from well-differentiated, low-grade neuroendocrine tumours-such as typical and atypical carcinoids-to high-grade, poorly differentiated aggressive malignancies, such as large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). While the incidence of SCLC has decreased, the worldwide incidence of other pulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms has been increasing over the past decades. In addition to the standard histopathological classification of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms, the introduction of molecular and sequencing techniques has led to new advances in understanding the biology of these diseases and might influence future classifications and staging that can subsequently improve management guidelines in the adjuvant or metastatic settings. Due to the rarity of neuroendocrine neoplasms, there is a paucity of prospective studies that focus on the lungs, especially in rare, well-differentiated carcinoids and LCNECs. In contrast with the success of targeted therapies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung often only have a few specific targetable gene alterations. Optimal therapy for LCNECs is not well defined and treatment recommendations are based on extrapolating guidelines for the management of patients with SCLC and NSCLC. This Review explores the epidemiology, diagnosis, and staging of lung neuroendocrine neoplasms to date. In addition, we focus on the evolving molecular landscape and biomarkers, ranging from tumour phenotypes to functional imaging studies and novel molecular biomarkers. We outline the various clinical outcomes, challenges, the treatment landscape, ongoing clinical trials, and future directions.

Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase 3 EXTENTORCH Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have poor prognoses and unmet medical needs.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapy (EP) vs placebo plus EP as a first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 randomized clinical trial (EXTENTORCH study) enrolled patients from September 26, 2019, to May 20, 2021, and was conducted at 49 sites in China. Eligible patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed ES-SCLC without previous systemic antitumor therapy for ES-SCLC. Data were analyzed between May 6, 2023, and June 1, 2024.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab, 240 mg, or placebo plus EP every 3 weeks for up to 4 to 6 cycles, followed by maintenance with toripalimab or placebo until disease progression, intolerable toxic effects, or up to 2 years of treatment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Whole-exome sequencing results identified correlative biomarkers for clinical efficacy.

Results

Among 595 screened patients, 442 eligible patients were randomized (median [range] age, 63 [30-77] years; 366 [82.8%] male); 223 patients were randomized to toripalimab plus EP, and 219 to placebo plus EP. By April 20, 2023, the median (range) survival follow-up was 13.7 (0.0-42.7) months. Compared with placebo, toripalimab improved investigator-assessed PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.54-0.82]; P < .001), and significantly reduced the risk of death (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65-0.98]; P = .03). The median OS was 14.6 (95% CI, 12.9-16.6) months in the toripalimab group vs 13.3 (95% CI, 11.8-14.4) months in the placebo group. Whole-exome sequencing results from 300 patients identified low intratumor heterogeneity, HLA-A11+ HLA-B62- haplotype, wild-type KMT2D and COL4A4, or sequence variations in CTNNA2 or SCN4A correlated with favorable PFS and OS in the toripalimab group. No new safety signals were observed. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse event incidence was similar between the toripalimab and placebo safety set groups (199 of 222 patients [89.6%] vs 193 of 216 patients [89.4%], respectively).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, adding toripalimab to first-line chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvements in PFS and OS for patients with ES-SCLC. The treatment exhibited an acceptable safety profile, supporting this combination regimen as a new treatment option for patients with ES-SCLC.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04012606.

Mechanisms of immunotherapy resistance in small cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor with a poor prognosis. Although the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy has modestly improved outcomes, most patients rapidly develop resistance. Resistance to immunotherapy can be broadly categorized into primary resistance and acquired resistance, as proposed by the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) consensus definition. Primary resistance occurs in the setting of failure to respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), while acquired resistance develops after initial response. The mechanisms of acquired and primary resistance to ICI are not well understood in SCLC, denoting an area of critical unmet need. Both intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms play significant roles in immunotherapy resistance. Intrinsic mechanisms include defects in antigen presentation, mutations in key genes, reduced tumor immunogenicity, and epigenetic alterations. Extrinsic mechanisms involve the tumor microenvironment (TME), which is a complex interplay of both tumor- and immunosuppressive immune cells, vasculature, and microbiome. An understanding of these resistance mechanisms is crucial for developing novel therapeutic strategies to advance effective immunotherapy in patients with SCLC, a critical area of unmet need.

Immuno-combined treatment versus radio-combined treatment in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

Background

Although the approval of immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has significantly improved the patient's prognosis, synchronous chemoradiotherapy has always been the standard treatment for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

Objectives

Immuno-combined and radio-combined therapy in LS-SCLC has been applied in clinical practice, but what is the best for LS-SCLC?

Design

This was a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

Patients with LS-SCLC from January 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively screened and divided into three groups according to the initial treatment regimen whether included immune-combined and radio-combined treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to analyze the predictors affecting the survival of LS-SCLC, and the progression pattern of patients and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) were also recorded.

Results

In this study, the median overall survival (OS) was 15.8 months, not yet reached (NR) and NR, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.7, 20.9, and 18.9 months in the immunotherapy combined chemotherapy (N = 34), immune combined chemoradiotherapy (N = 26), and chemoradiotherapy (N = 53) groups, respectively. OS and PFS were significantly prolonged in the radio-combined groups compared with the non-radio-combined group, and there was no significant difference between the radio-combined groups, namely immunotherapy combined chemoradiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy groups. In this study, we also constructed some indexes to predict prognosis for LS-SCLC, derived neutrophil and lymphocyte ratios were significantly associated with worse survival, and systemic inflammatory index and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels were significantly associated with shorter PFS. The primary organs of progression remained the lung and brain, the main immune-related AE was hypothyroidism, and the radiation-related AE was pneumonia.

Conclusion

Radiation-combined therapy still plays an important role in LS-SCLC in the era of immunotherapy, and clinicians cannot abandon the use of radiation therapy in the initial treatment plan for LS-SCLC.

Simultaneous care provision to patients with small cell lung cancer in Lazio region: Practical recommendations of a multidisciplinary group

Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) accounts for 15 % of all lung cancer cases. Due to comorbidities and its aggressive behaviour, patients are highly symptomatic even at a non-metastatic stage. Standardizing the care pathway and introducing a simultaneous care approach could address the unmet needs of this disease. However, there is no uniformity in the involvement of palliative care physicians and in the simultaneous use of palliative care and cancer therapies. In this context, 13 experts from Lazio region undertook a process to deepen their understanding of the regional provision of simultaneous care to patients with SCLC by structuring and carrying out a survey. The survey covered 35-52 % of SCLC cases in the region, confirming heterogeneous results in both management and therapeutic approach, particularly in the area of simultaneous care. The working group met to define practical recommendations with the aim of standardizing the management of this disease.

Novel strategy for comprehensive therapy with sustainably complete response in a patient with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a case report

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumor with the poorest prognosis among all types of lung cancer. Developing an effective comprehensive strategy remains a key focus. We herein present the first documented case of a 68-year-old man with limited-stage SCLC who has maintained a complete response (CR) for over 30 months to date. CR was achieved with first-line chemotherapy using etoposide and carboplatin combined with chest volumetric-modulated arc therapy. Maintenance therapy with anlotinib extended the progression-free survival to 20 months after first-line therapy. When resistance developed, second-line therapy with albumin-bound paclitaxel, carboplatin, and the immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab sustained CR for 7 months. Third-line therapy with etoposide and cisplatin combined with durvalumab has maintained CR to date.

Different approach to M descriptor for future staging of oligometastatic disease in SCLC: A cross-sectional survival analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of oligometastasis and the M descriptor on survival in small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective study included patients with newly diagnosed extensive-stage SCLC(ES-SCLC) from 2010 to 2020. Subgroups: Group 1: single metastasis in a single organ, Group 2: 2-5 metastases in a single organ, Group 3: 6 or more metastases in a single organ, and Group 4: metastases in two or more organs. This classification was based on the 9th Staging-M descriptor. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 439 patients was 62 ± 10 years, and 89.5% of them were male. The mean PFS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 10.7 months (95% CI 8.9-12.5), 7.5 months (95% CI 5.6-9.4), 4.3 months (95% CI 2.9-5.7), and 5.4 months (95% CI 4.7-6.1), respectively. PFS in Group 2 was significantly higher. The mean OS for Groups 1, 2, 3, 4 was 13.3 months (95% CI 11.2-15.3), 9.5 months (95% CI 7.1-11.9), 7.1 months (95% CI 4.5-9.7), and 6.9 months (95% CI 6.0-7.9), respectively. OS in Group 1 was significantly higher. OS and PFS in the M1b group were significantly higher than in the M1c1 and M1c2 groups (p < 0.05) with no statistical difference between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups.

CONCLUSION

There is no significant difference in survival between the M1c1 and M1c2 groups. In ES-SCLC, the number of metastases may be a more predictive factor for prognosis than the number of metastatic organs.

Role of stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer is the most aggressive form of lung neoplasia, treated in recent decades with chemoradiotherapy in case of limited stage and chemotherapy alone at the metastatic stage. In the last few years, the advent of immunotherapy has changed the landscape in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, and to a lesser degree in small-cell lung cancer. Despite the recent advances in research, small-cell lung cancer is still considered an aggressive and lethal disease characterized by high recurrence or metastatic potential. As stereotactic radiotherapy has established itself as the standard of care in the early stage of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer and in metastatic disease to treat brain and extracranial metastases, these same issues now arise in the management of small-cell lung cancer. This article aims to review the current knowledge and the potential of stereotactic radiotherapy in small-cell lung cancer.

Stimulation of cGAS-STING pathway as a challenge in the treatment of small cell lung cancer: a feasible strategy?

Lung cancer has a significant incidence among the population and, unfortunately, has an unfavourable prognosis in most cases. The World Health Organization (WHO) classifies lung tumours into two subtypes based on their phenotype: the Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and the Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). SCLC treatment, despite advances in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, is often unsuccessful for cancer recurrence highlighting the need to develop novel therapeutic strategies. In this review, we describe the genetic landscape and tumour microenvironment that characterize the pathological processes of SCLC and how they are responsible for tumour immune evasion. The immunosuppressive mechanisms engaged in SCLC are critical factors to understand the failure of immunotherapy in SCLC and, conversely, suggest that new signalling pathways, such as cGAS/STING, should be investigated as possible targets to stimulate an innate immune response in this subtype of lung cancer. The full comprehension of the innate immunity of cancer cells is thus crucial to open new challenges for successful immunotherapy in treating SCLC and improving patient outcomes.

The Optimal Radiotherapy Strategy for Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastasis: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is a notoriously aggressive malignancy frequently associated with brain metastases (BMs), presenting substantial therapeutic challenges. This study delves into the effectiveness of immunotherapy combined with diverse radiotherapy, especially the influence of brain radiotherapy (BRT) on survival outcomes in the immunotherapy era.

METHODS

ES-SCLC patients treated at Xiangya Hospital and Xiangya Boai Hospital from February 2020 to June 2024 were retrospectively included. The study focused on patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Metrics included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), employing univariate and multivariate Cox regression models for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 393 patients with ES-SCLC who received ICIs were included in the study. Within the entire cohort, the presence of baseline BMs did not statistically affect OS or PFS. However, thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) was identified as a favorable prognostic factor for both OS and PFS. BRT demonstrated a beneficial effect on OS across both the general cohort and the baseline_BMs subgroup. In patients from the baseline_BMs subgroup who had previously undergone TRT, ICIs plus BRT did not significantly improve OS compared to ICIs alone. Conversely, for patients who had not received prior TRT, adding BRT to ICIs significantly enhanced OS. Among the patients who underwent BRT, 71 received whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) while 19 opted for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). No significant differences in OS and PFS were observed between the SRS and WBRT modalities. The sequence of ICIs relative to BRT was found to influence PFS adversely. Administering BRT before ICIs (RT-ICI) was associated with worse PFS compared to administering ICIs followed by BRT (ICI-RT). Additionally, no significant differences in OS and PFS were noted among the three subgroups defined by varying intervals between ICIs and BRT. For patients without baseline BMs, TRT and prophylactic cranial irradiation were associated with delayed onset of brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscores the importance of optimizing treatment strategies and considering the timing and integration of radiotherapy and immunotherapy to improve outcomes for patients with ES-SCLC, particularly those at risk of or presenting with BMs.

A biomarker exploration in small-cell lung cancer for brain metastases risk and prophylactic cranial irradiation therapy efficacy

BACKGROUND

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. Limited-stage (LS)-SCLC comprises only one-third of SCLC cases, resulting in limited molecularly targeted therapies and treatment options. Despite advances in thoracic and cranial irradiation leading to improved outcomes, a notable proportion of patients develop brain metastasis (BM), highlighting the importance of identifying high-risk patients for tailored screening and treatment strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed baseline tumor biopsies from 180 LS-SCLC patients who received frontline definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) using a 474-gene pan-cancer panel. The cumulative incidence of BM was calculated with death scored as a competing risk. Independent prognostic factors for BM risk were identified using the Fine-Gray model.

RESULTS

Alterations in the cell cycle pathway, particularly RB1 mutations, were more common in patients with BM, while FLT4 mutations were more frequent in those without BM (P=0.002 and P=0.021, respectively). Significant risk factors for BM include smoking (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR]: 1.73; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-2.70; P=0.016), RB1 mutations (SHR: 2.19; 95 % CI: 1.27-3.81; P=0.005), and BCL3 amplification (SHR: 2.27; 95 % CI: 1.09-4.71; P=0.028). Conversely, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) (SHR: 0.39; 95 % CI: 0.25-1.60; P<0.001), FLT4 mutations (SHR: 0.26; 95 % CI: 0.07-0.98; P=0.047), and NOTCH pathway alterations (SHR: 0.65; 95 % CI: 0.43-1.00; P=0.049) were associated with a lower incidence of BM in LS-SCLC. Notably, consolidation PCI therapy did not reduce the BM risk in patients with baseline RB1 mutations, with BM occurrence probabilities of 34.7 % at 20 months and 62.6 % at 40 months.

CONCLUSION

Our study yields valuable insights into the genetic characteristics of LS-SCLC patients with and without BM, aiding the development of personalized treatment strategies. Identifying risk factors associated with the incidence and timing of BM, within the standard regimen of dCRT followed by PCI, may help optimize clinical decision-making for LS-SCLC.

Small cell lung cancer and neuroendocrine tumours

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. It can broadly be divided into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and nonsmall cell lung cancer. There have been many advances over the recent years in both fields. The purpose of this review is to provide a concise summary of SCLC for the general respiratory readership.

What is the Reason That the Pharmacological Future of Chemotherapeutics in the Treatment of Lung Cancer Could Be Most Closely Related to Nanostructures? Platinum Drugs in Therapy of Non-Small and Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Unexpected, Possible Interactions. The Review

Over the course of several decades, anticancer treatment with chemotherapy drugs for lung cancer has not changed significantly. Unfortunately, this treatment prolongs the patient's life only by a few months, causing many side effects in the human body. It has also been proven that drugs such as Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Oxaliplatin and others can react with other substances containing an aromatic ring in which the nitrogen atom has a free electron group in its structure. Thus, such structures may have a competitive effect on the nucleobases of DNA. Therefore, scientists are looking not only for new drugs, but also for new alternative ways of delivering the drug to the cancer site. Nanotechnology seems to be a great hope in this matter. Creating a new nanomedicine would reduce the dose of the drug to an absolute minimum, and thus limit the toxic effect of the drug; it would allow for the exclusion of interactions with competitive compounds with a structure similar to nucleobases; it would also permit using the so-called targeted treatment and bypassing healthy cells; it would allow for the introduction of other treatment options, such as radiotherapy directly to the cancer site; and it would provide diagnostic possibilities. This article is a review that aims to systematize the knowledge regarding the anticancer treatment of lung cancer, but not only. It shows the clear possibility of interactions of chemotherapeutics with compounds competitive to the nitrogenous bases of DNA. It also shows the possibilities of using nanostructures as potential Platinum drug carriers, and proves that nanomedicine can easily become a new medicinal product in personalized medicine.

Advances in predictive biomarkers associated with immunotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly malignant and poor-prognosis cancer, with most cases diagnosed at the extensive stage (ES). Amidst a landscape marked by limited progress in treatment modalities for ES-SCLC over the past few decades, the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with platinum-based chemotherapy has provided a milestone approach for improving prognosis, emerging as the new standard for initial therapy in ES-SCLC. However, only a minority of SCLC patients can benefit from ICIs, which frequently come with varying degrees of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Therefore, it is crucial to investigate predictive biomarkers to screen potential beneficiaries of ICIs, mitigate the risk of side effects, and improve treatment precision. This review summarized potential biomarkers for predicting ICI response in ES-SCLC, with a primary focus on markers sourced from tumor tissue or peripheral blood samples. The former mainly included PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), along with cellular or molecular components related to the tumor microenvironment (TME) and antigen presentation machinery (APM), molecular subtypes of SCLC, and inflammatory gene expression profiles. Circulating biomarkers predominantly comprised circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cytokines, plasma autoantibodies, inflammation-related parameters, and blood TMB. We synthesized and analyzed the research progress of these potential markers. Notably, investigations into PD-L1 expression and TMB have been the most extensive, exhibiting preliminary predictive efficacy in salvage immunotherapy; however, consistent conclusions have yet to be reached across studies. Additionally, novel predictive markers developed based on TME composition, APM, transcriptomic and genomic features provide promising tools for precision immunotherapy. Circulating biomarkers offer the advantages of convenience, non-invasiveness, and a comprehensive reflection of tumor molecular characteristics. They may serve as alternative options for predicting immunotherapy efficacy in SCLC. However, there is a scarcity of studies, and the significant heterogeneity in research findings warrants attention.

Integration of clinical and blood parameters in risk prognostication for patients receiving immunochemotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer: real-world data from two centers

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had modest advances in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in clinical trials, but there is a lack of biomarkers for prognosis in clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from ES-SCLC patients who received ICIs combined chemotherapy from two centers in China, integrated clinical and blood parameters, and constructed risk prognostication for immunochemotherapy. The population was divided into high- and low-risk groups, and the performance of the model was assessed separately in the training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty and 43 patients were included in the training and validation groups, respectively. The important predictors were screened including body mass index, liver metastases, coefficient variation of red blood cell distribution width, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, and C-reactive protein. Predicting 1-year overall survival (OS), the AUC values under ROC for the model under training, internal validation, and external validation were 0.760, 0.732, and 0.722, respectively, and the calibration curve and clinical decision curve performed well. Applied the model to divide patients into low-risk and high-risk groups, and the median OS was 23.7 months and 9.1 months, and the median progression-free survival was 8.2 months and 4.8 months, respectively; furthermore, this ability to discriminate survival was also observed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed a novel prognostic model for ES-SCLC to predict survival employing baseline tumor burden, nutritional and inflammatory parameters, it is easily measured to screen high-risk patient populations.

Analysis of high‑risk factors for brain metastasis and prognosis after prophylactic cranial irradiation in limited‑stage small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a high propensity for brain metastases (BM). Limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) can be effectively treated with chemoradiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) to enhance patient outcomes. The aim of the present study was to assess the risk factors and prognostic significance of brain metastases (BM) in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) who attained complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) following combined chemoradiotherapy and subsequent prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI). Data for 290 patients diagnosed with LS-SCLC and treated at Chengde Central Hospital and Hebei Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (Chengde, China), who achieved CR or PR and underwent PCI between 2015 and 2023, were retrospectively analyzed. BM rates and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, whilst differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Risk factors affecting BM and OS were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. The overall incidence of BM after PCI was 16.6% (48/290), with annual rates of 1.4, 6.6 and 12.8% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified an initial tumor size of >5 cm [hazard ratio (HR)=15.031; 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.610-40.270; P<0.001] as a significant independent risk factor for BM following PCI. The median OS was 28.8 months and the 5-year OS rate was 27.9%. The median OS for patients with and without BM at 27.55 and 32.5 months, respectively, and the corresponding 5-year OS rates were 8.3 and 31.8%, respectively (P=0.001). Median OS rates for stages I, II and III were 61.15, 48.5 and 28.4 months, respectively, with 5-year OS rates of 62.5, 47.1 and 21.6%, respectively (P<0.001). Further multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that BM (HR=1.934; 95% CI: 1.358-2.764; P<0.001) and clinical stage (HR=1.741; 95% CI: 1.102-2.750; P=0.018; P=0.022) were significant independent risk factors associated with patient OS. In conclusion, a tumor size of >5 cm is a significant risk factor for BM following PCI in patients with LS-SCLS achieving CR or PR through radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Furthermore, BM and clinical staging independently influence OS.

Challenges and future perspectives for the use of temozolomide in the treatment of SCLC

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), accounting for 10-20 % of all lung tumors, represents the most aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. Most patients are diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), with brian metastases identified in ∼ 80 % of cases during the disease cours, and the prognosis is dismal, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5 %. Current available treatments in the second-line setting are limited, and topotecan has long been the only FDA-approved drug in relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC, until the recent approval of lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of RNA polymerase II. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent, which showed single-agent activity in SCLC, particularly among patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Several studies have revealed the synergistic activity of temozolomide with poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, that prevent repair of TMZ-induced DNA damage. This review focuses on the rationale for the use of TMZ in ES-SCLC and provides an overview of the main trials that have evaluated and are currently investigating its role, both as a single-agent and in combinations, in relapse or refractory disease.

The effects of surgical resection in the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

This study aimed to examine the effects of surgical resection on the treatment of limited-stage small cell lung cancer and identify patient characteristics that may indicate a benefit from surgical resection. We retrospectively reviewed medical data from patients diagnosed with small cell lung cancer between January 2013 and December 2020 at three hospitals. A total of 478 patients were included in the study, 153 patients received surgery treatment and 325 patients received non-surgery treatment. Survival differences between the surgical resection group and the nonsurgical resection group were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. The overall survival in the surgical resection group was significantly improved compared to that in the nonsurgical resection group (HR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.370-0.876, p = 0.0126). Surgical resection significantly improved overall survival compared to nonsurgical resection in stage I disease (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.34-0.94, p = 0.029) and stage IIA disease (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.92, p = 0.019). However, no significant differences in overall survival were found between surgical resection and nonsurgical resection in stage IIB disease (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.57-1.29, p = 0.46) and stage III disease (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.71-1.39, p = 0.97). The overall survival of patients who underwent lobectomy was significantly better than that of patients who underwent sublobular resection (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.15-4.16, p = 0.021) and who underwent pneumonectomy (HR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.29-5.28, p = 0.009). Surgical resection should be recommended for patients diagnosed with stage I-IIA SCLC. When deciding on the surgical type, it is preferable to choose lobectomy over sublobar resection or pneumonectomy.

Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety in First-Line Treatment Methods for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Comparative Study of Chemotherapy, Targeted Therapy Combined With Chemotherapy, and Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive tumor with limited effectiveness in its standard chemotherapy treatment. Targeted antiangiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated potential as alternative treatments for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). However, there is insufficient comparative evidence available to determine the optimal first-line treatment option between ICIs plus chemotherapy and targeted antiangiogenic therapy plus chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed at analyzing clinical data from ES-SCLC patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College between June 2021 and June 2023. The study compared the efficacy and safety of three first-line treatment regimens: standard chemotherapy, antiangiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy, and immune combination therapy.

METHODS

Patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups: chemotherapy, immune combination therapy, and antiangiogenic therapy combined with chemotherapy. The study collected data on clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and adverse reactions. The analysis included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment safety.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients were included in the study, with 49 receiving chemotherapy alone, 19 receiving antiangiogenic therapy, and 33 receiving immune combination therapy. The ORRs were 78.9% for antiangiogenic therapy, 72.7% for immune combination therapy, and 42.9% for chemotherapy alone. The median PFS was 8.0 months for antiangiogenic therapy, 7.8 months for immune combination therapy, and 5.2 months for chemotherapy alone. Both combination therapy groups demonstrated superior efficacy compared to chemotherapy alone.

CONCLUSION

Targeted combined chemotherapy and immune combination chemotherapy showed superior efficacy as first-line treatments for ES-SCLC compared to chemotherapy alone, with manageable adverse reactions.

Navigating first-line therapies for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a frequentist network meta-analysis and systematic review

Aim: To identify the optimal first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).Materials & methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis (CRD42023486863) to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of eight first-line treatment regimens for ES-SCLC, including 15 clinical trials.Results: Our analysis showed that the PD-1/PD-L1 + etoposide combined with platinum (EP) and PD-L1 + vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) + EP regimens significantly enhanced overall survival and progression-free survival, with subgroup analysis revealing that serplulimab ranked as the most promising option for improving overall survival. Integrating anti-angiogenesis drugs into immunochemotherapy presents potential benefits, with an increased incidence of adverse events necessitating further investigation.Conclusion: Our findings offer valuable insights for future research and for developing more effective treatment strategies for ES-SCLC, underscoring the critical need for continued innovation in this therapeutic area.

Enhanced Lung Cancer Detection Using a Combined Ratio of Antigen-Autoantibody Immune Complexes against CYFRA 21-1 and p53

The early detection of lung cancer (LC) improves patient outcomes, but current methods have limitations. Autoantibodies against tumor-associated antigens have potential as early biomarkers. This study evaluated the 9G testTM Cancer/Lung, measuring circulating complexes of two antigen-autoantibody immune complexes (AIC) against their respective free antigens (CYFRA 21-1 and p53) for LC diagnosis. We analyzed 100 LC patients and 119 healthy controls using the 9G testTM Cancer/Lung, quantifying the levels of AICs (CYFRA 21-1-Anti-CYFRA 21-1 autoantibody immune complex (CIC) and p53-Anti-p53 autoantibody immune complex (PIC)), free antigens (CYFRA 21-1 and p53), and ratios of AICs/antigens (LC index). The levels of the CICs and PICs were significantly elevated in LC compared to the controls (p < 0.0062 and p < 0.0026), while free antigens showed no significant difference. The CIC/CYFRA 21-1 and PIC/p53 ratios were also significantly higher in LC (all, p < 0.0001). The LC index, when combining both ratios, exhibited the best diagnostic performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.945, exceeding individual CICs, PICs, and free antigens (AUCs ≤ 0.887). At a cut-off of 3.60, the LC index achieved 81% sensitivity and 95% specificity for LC diagnosis. It detected early-stage (Stage I-II) LC with 87.5% sensitivity, exceeding its performance in advanced stages (72.7%). The LC index showed no significant differences based on age, gender, smoking status (former, current, or never smoker), or pack years smoked. The LC index demonstrates promising potential for early LC diagnosis, exceeding conventional free antigen markers.

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in patients receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide: stratification of outcome based on a composite score that combines gene expression profiling and immune characterization of microenvironment

PURPOSE

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with a dismal prognosis. The addition of immune checkpoints inhibitors to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line setting achieves a durable benefit only in a patient subgroup. Thus, the identification of predictive biomarkers is an urgent unmet medical need.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumor samples from naive extensive-stage (ES) SCLC patients receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide were analyzed by gene expression profiling and two 9-color multiplex immunofluorescence panels, to characterize the immune infiltrate and SCLC subtypes. Associations of tissue biomarkers with time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were assessed.

RESULTS

42 patients were included. Higher expression of exhausted CD8-related genes was independently associated with a longer TTF and PFS while increased density of B lymphocytes correlated with longer TTF and OS. Higher percentage of M2-like macrophages close to tumor cells and of CD8+T cells close to CD4+T lymphocytes correlated with increased risk of TF and longer survival, respectively. A lower risk of TF, disease progression and death was associated with a higher density of ASCL1+tumor cells while the expression of POU2F3 correlated with a shorter survival. A composite score combining the expression of exhausted CD8-related genes, B lymphocyte density, ASCL1 tumor expression and quantification of CD163+macrophages close to tumor cells, was able to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we identified tissue biomarkers and a combined score that can predict a higher benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients.

The Dose/Fractionation Debate in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

To explore the most suitable dosage regimen for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) and provide references for clinical selection, strict inclusion criteria were applied, and studies were screened from Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. Subsequently, data on two-year overall survival rates and dosage regimens were collected, and scatter plots were constructed to provide a comprehensive perspective. The survival benefits of various dosage regimens were evaluated, and a linear quadratic equation was utilized to fit the relationship between the biologically effective dose (BED10) and the two-year overall survival rate. Among the five randomized controlled trials, the two-year overall survival rate of ConvTRT regimens with BED10 > 60 Gy (rough value) was only at or below the median of all ConvTRT regimens or all included study regimens, indicating that increasing the number and total dose of ConvTRT does not necessarily lead to better prognosis. In the exploration of HypoTRT regimens, there was a linear positive correlation between BED10 and the two-year overall survival rate (p < 0.0001), while the exploration of HyperTRT regimens was relatively limited, with the majority focused on the 45 Gy/30 F regimen. However, the current 45 Gy/30 F regimen is not sufficient to control LS-SCLC, resulting in a high local recurrence rate. High-dose ConvTRT regimens have long treatment durations and may induce tumor regrowth which may cause reduced efficacy. Under reasonable toxicity reactions, HyperTRT or HypoTRT with higher radiotherapy doses is recommended for treating LS-SCLC.

CD3, CD8, IFN-γ, tumor and stroma inflammatory cells as prognostic indicators for surgically resected SCLC: evidences from a 10-year retrospective study and immunohistochemical analysis

Current clinical guidelines limit surgical intervention to patients with cT1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Our objective was to reassess the role of surgery in SCLC management, and explore novel prognostic indicators for surgically resected SCLC. We reviewed all patients diagnosed with SCLC from January 2011 to April 2021 in our institution. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent prognostic factors were assessed through the Cox proportional hazard model. In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed to evaluate the predictive value of selected indicators in the prognosis of surgically resected SCLC patients. In the study, 177 SCLC patients undergoing surgical resection were ultimately included. Both univariate and multivariate Cox analysis revealed that incomplete postoperative adjuvant therapy emerged as an independent risk factor for adverse prognosis (p < 0.001, HR 2.96). Survival analysis revealed significantly superior survival among pN0-1 patients compared to pN2 patients (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in postoperative survival was observed between pN1 and pN0 patients (p = 0.062). Patients with postoperative stable disease (SD) exhibited lower levels of tumor inflammatory cells (TIC) (p = 0.0047) and IFN-γ expression in both area and intensity (p < 0.0001 and 0.0091, respectively) compared to those with postoperative progressive disease (PD). Conversely, patients with postoperative SD showed elevated levels of stromal inflammatory cells (SIC) (p = 0.0453) and increased counts of CD3+ and CD8+ cells (p = 0.0262 and 0.0330, respectively). Survival analysis indicated that high levels of SIC, along with low levels of IFN-γ+ cell area within tumor tissue, may correlate positively with improved prognosis in surgically resected SCLC (p = 0.017 and 0.012, respectively). In conclusion, the present study revealed that the patients with pT1-2N1M0 staging were a potential subgroup of SCLC patients who may benefit from surgery. Complete postoperative adjuvant therapy remains an independent factor promoting a better prognosis for SCLC patients undergoing surgical resection. Moreover, CD3, CD8, IFN-γ, TIC, and SIC may serve as potential indicators for predicting the prognosis of surgically resected SCLC.

Nomograms Predict PFS and OS for SCLC Patients After Standardized Treatment: A Real-World Study

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the process of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients from achieving optimal efficacy to experiencing disease progression until death. It examines the predictive value of the treatment response on progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of SCLC patients.

Patients and Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis on 136 SCLC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2018. Important prognostic factors were identified to construct nomogram models. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curves and calibration curves. Survival differences between groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Subsequently, an independent cohort consisting of 106 SCLC patients diagnosed from 2014 to 2021 was used for validation.

Results

We constructed two nomograms to predict first-line PFS (PFS1) and OS of SCLC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the PFS1 nomogram predicting PFS at 3-, 6-, and 12-months were 0.919 (95% CI: 0.867-0.970), 0.908 (95% CI: 0.860-0.956) and 0.878 (95% CI: 0.798-0.958), and for the OS nomogram predicting OS at 6-, 12-, and 24-months were 0.814 (95% CI: 0.736-0.892), 0.819 (95% CI: 0.749-0.889) and 0.809 (95% CI: 0.678-0.941), indicating those two models with a high discriminative ability. The calibration curves demonstrated the models had a high degree of consistency between predicted and observed values. According to the risk scores, patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups, showing a significant difference in survival rate. And these findings were validated in another independent validation cohort.

Conclusion

Based on the patients' treatment response after standardized treatment, we developed and validated two nomogram models to predict PFS1 and OS of SCLC. The models demonstrated good accuracy, reliability and clinical applicability by validating in an independent cohort.

Applied models and molecular characteristics of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive type of cancer frequently diagnosed with metastatic spread, rendering it surgically unresectable for the majority of patients. Although initial responses to platinum-based therapies are often observed, SCLC invariably relapses within months, frequently developing drug-resistance ultimately contributing to short overall survival rates. Recently, SCLC research aimed to elucidate the dynamic changes in the genetic and epigenetic landscape. These have revealed distinct subtypes of SCLC, each characterized by unique molecular signatures. The recent understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of SCLC has opened up potential avenues for precision medicine, enabling the development of targeted therapeutic strategies. In this review, we delve into the applied models and computational approaches that have been instrumental in the identification of promising drug candidates. We also explore the emerging molecular diagnostic tools that hold the potential to transform clinical practice and patient care.

Efficacy and safety of different immunotherapies combined with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressants combined with chemotherapy in treating patients with small-cell lung cancer (extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer, limited-disease small-cell lung cancer and relapsed small-cell lung cancer) are still unknown, and there are no reports directly comparing the efficacy and safety of other immunotherapies.

Objective

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer.

Method

We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases for relevant articles published from inception to November 11, 2020. The risk of bias of the included studies was conducted using the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB) tool. Multiple Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. They conducted data analysis using R Studio and STATA version 15.1. The outcomes comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), stability of response (SOR), duration of response (DOR) and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (AE grade≥3). A 95% confidence interval (CI) was provided for each estimate.

Results

This meta-analysis included 16 RCT studies with 5898 patients. For OS, relative to chemotherapy (MD=-4.49; 95%CI [-7.97, -1.03]), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (MD=-4.62; 95%CI [-9.08, -0.11]), ipilimumab (MD=-4.26; 95%CI [-8.01, -0.3]) and nivolumab(MD=-5.66; 95%CI [-10.44, -1.11]) and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (MD=-4.56; 95%CI [-8.7, -0.1]), serplulimab can significantly increase the OS of SCLC patients. There was no significant difference between PFS, SOR and DOR. Analysis of AE showed that different immunotherapy combined chemotherapy regimens were similar to single chemotherapy regarding the overall incidence of AE grade≥3. However, after the cumulative ranking of the common symptoms of different adverse reactions, it was found that nivolumab ranked first in the occurrence probability of anemia (99.08%), fatigue (84.78%), and decreased appetite (89.66%). durvalumab was the most likely in nausea (75.4%). Pembrolizumab (76.24%) was most likely to cause pruritus. Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy caused less diarrhea than chemotherapy alone (80.16%).

Conclusions

According to our analysis, serplulimab combined with chemotherapy is more likely to show better efficacy with a manageable safety profile for small-cell lung cancer. However, the evidence for this comparison shows some limitations due to the number of literature.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023486053.

Prognostic value of PAX8 in small cell lung cancer

Objectives

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) shows poor prognosis since it metastasizes widely at early stage. Paired box gene (PAX) 8 is a transcriptional factor of PAX family, of which the expression in lung cancer is a controversial issue, and its prognostic value of PAX8 in SCLC is still unclear.

Materials and methods

Overall, 184 subjects who were pathologically diagnosed with SCLC were enrolled in the study. Immunohistochemical analysis of PAX8 and Ki-67 were performed. The correlations between PAX8 expression and clinical features or Ki-67 index were further analyzed. Subsequently, an analysis of the association between PAX8, stage, Ki-67 status, and overall survival (OS) were performed in 169 subjects with follow-up information.

Results

PAX8 was positive in 53.8% (99/184) SCLC specimens. The positive rate is significantly higher in extensive-stage specimens (61.0%) than in limited-stage specimens (45.24%). PAX8 expression is positively correlated with Ki-67 index (P = 0.001) while negatively correlated with OS (HR = 3.725, 95% CI 1.943-7.139, P＜0.001). In combination groups, the PAX8 negative and limited stage group had the most promising OS.

Conclusion

PAX8 expression rate in SCLC specimens is not low. It has prognostic value in small cell lung cancer.

Phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of 45 Gy versus 30 Gy thoracic radiation for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): Study protocol

BACKGROUND

Consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (cTRT) has previously shown benefit to patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) who respond to chemotherapy. However, the optimum dose of cTRT is unknown. The purpose of this randomized trial is to compare the efficacy of 45 Gy in 15 fractions with 30 Gy in 10 fractions cTRT in ES-SCLC.

METHODS

This phase III, multicenter, randomized trial is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of different cTRT dose in ES-SCLC. Eligible patients with pathologically confirmed ES-SCLC who responded to 4-6 cycles of etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) or carboplatin (EC) chemotherapy were randomized 1:1 to receive either 30 Gy in 10 fractions (standard dose) or 45 Gy in 15 fractions (high dose) cTRT. The primary endpoint is 2-year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), 2-year local control (LC) and treatment related toxicity as measured by adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0).

DISCUSSION

The present study is the first randomized phase III trial designed to evaluate the efficacy of higher versus lower dose cTRT in ES-SCLC, providing evidence for future clinical practice in prolonging survival of patients with ES-SCLC.

Prognostic significance of body mass index and serum albumin as the indicators of nutritional status in small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Body mass index (BMI) and serum albumin (ALB) level are long-established markers that reflect the nutritional status and eventually the prognosis of cancer patients. The objective of the study was to determine the clinical significance of these factors and specify their roles in outcomes compared with performance status (PS) and weight loss (WL), which are considered the most significant patient-related prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with platinum-etoposide-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 378 patients with SCLC were enrolled in the study and analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

BMI values were similar by clinical stage, whereas the percentages of the patients with WL, low serum ALB, and particularly poor (≥2) PS were significantly higher in patients with extended disease SCLC (ED-SCLC) compared to those with limited disease SCLC (LD-SCLC). In LD-SCLC, patients with poor PS lived for a significantly shorter time than patients with good PS (HR: 7.791, p = 0.0001); however, BMI (HR: 1.035, p = 0.8), WL (HR: 0.857, p = 0.5), and ALB (HR: 0.743, p = 0.3) had no significant effect on the outcome. In ED-SCLC, PS (HR: 4.257, p = 0.0001), WL (HR: 1.677, p = 0.001), and ALB (HR: 0.680, p = 0.007) had an impact on survival, but BMI did not (HR: 0.791, p = 0.08). In LD-SCLC, the univariate analysis showed that only poor PS was correlated with increased mortality (HR: 7.791, p = 0.0001); yet it lost significance in multivariate analysis. In ED-SCLC, poor PS (HR: 4.257, p = 0.0001), WL (HR: 1.667, p = 0.001), and a low ALB level (HR: 0.680, p = 0.007) were shown to be factors for poor prognosis in the univariate analysis; yet only PS remained significant in multivariate analysis (HR: 2.286, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Even though BMI and serum albumin showed no prognostic value in SCLC patients treated with chemotherapy, PS was found to be the most significant prognostic factor in both LD- and ED-SCLC stages.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Platinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT).

METHODS

Patients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects.

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis.

CONCLUSION

Addition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.

Atezolizumab addition to platinum doublet: evaluating survival outcomes for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of adding atezolizumab to the platinum doublet regimen for extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) remains marginally limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed the real-world efficacy and safety of atezolizumab in addition to carboplatin and etoposide (EP + A), versus carboplatin and etoposide (EP) alone in previously untreated ED-SCLC patients.

RESULTS

From a total of 99 patients, 46 were assigned to the EP + A group, and 53 to the EP group. No significant difference was observed in progression-free survival between the groups. However, the overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the EP + A group (20.8 vs 12.1 months; HR: 0.52; p = 0.0127). Patients older than 70 years, male, with performance status 0-1, without liver metastasis, and low levels of C-reactive protein and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, experienced longer OS in the EP + A group compared to the EP group.

CONCLUSION

The addition of atezolizumab to the platinum doublet regimen significantly extended OS in ED-SCLC patients, particularly among certain subgroups, suggesting its potential value in personalized treatment strategies. Further investigation is warranted to validate these findings.

Clinical Impact of Pre-Existing Autoantibodies in Patients With SCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study

Introduction

Although pretreatment autoantibodies have been associated with immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment efficacy in some types of cancer, their importance has not been evaluated in patients with SCLC.

Methods

A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted on a total of 52 patients with extensive-disease SCLC who received immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment at either of the six participating centers in Japan. Pretreatment serum samples were collected and analyzed for autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid). Moreover, 12 antineuronal antibodies (AMPH, CV2, PNMA2, Ri, Yo, Hu, Recoverin, SOX1, Titin, Zic4, GAD65, and Tr) were analyzed using immunoblot assays. The primary end point was the incidence of irAEs with or without autoantibodies. The secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) on the basis of the presence or absence of autoantibodies.

Results

PFS and OS were 4.4 and 25.3 months, respectively. Autoantibodies (rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, and antithyroid antibodies) were detected in 29 patients (56%). In total, irAEs were observed in 18 patients (35%); irAE incidence was 48% in the autoantibody-positive group and 17% in the autoantibody-negative group (p = 0.039). There was no difference in PFS or OS between patients with and without autoantibodies (4.4 mo versus 4.6 mo, p = 0.36; 15.3 mo versus 18.2 mo, p = 0.36). Antineuronal antibodies were detected in 16 patients (31%). However, the development of neurologic irAEs was not observed in both groups.

Conclusions

Vigilance is required against the development of irAEs in pretreatment antibody-positive patients.

Survival of small-cell lung cancer patients after surgery: A single-center retrospective cohort study

This study summarized and analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognosis of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients after surgical treatment. The clinical data of 130 patients (99 males and 31 females) with SCLC treated by surgery and confirmed by postoperative pathological examination at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from April 2004 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical characteristics, surgery, pathological stage, and perioperative treatment were summarized. Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression analysis were performed. Pathological examination revealed that 36 (27.69%) patients had stage I SCLC, 22 (16.92%) patients had stage II SCLC, 65 (50.00%) patients had stage III SCLC, and 7 (5.39%) patients had stage IV SCLC. The overall median survival time was 50 months (95% confidence interval, 10.8-89.2 months). The median survival time of stage I, II, III and IV SCLC patients was 148, 42, 32, and 10 months, respectively. In patients who underwent surgical treatment, postoperative adjuvant therapy and tumor stage were independent prognostic factors for survival (p < 0.05).Lobectomy and lymph nodes resection combined with adjuvant therapy were cautiously recommended for stage I-IIIa SCLC patients.

Leptin-mediated meta-inflammation may provide survival benefit in patients receiving maintenance immunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

BACKGROUND

Only few ES-SCLC patients experience long-term survival benefit by maintenance IT. Adipokines-induced metabolic meta-inflammation has been related to enhanced responsiveness to IT in obese patients; however, their prognostic role in SCLC is currently controversial.

METHODS

Pre-treatment CT scan was used for determining distribution of abdominal adiposity, and blood samples were collected at fasting for measuring glycemia, insulin, ghrelin, leptin and adipokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6 and MCP-1). Patients with known history of DM type II or metabolic syndrome with HOMA index > 2.5 were considered insulin resistant (IR).

RESULTS

In ES-SCLC pts receiving maintenance IT, increased leptin concentration and higher leptin/visceral adipose tissue (VAT) ratio were significantly associated with prolonged PFS. By applying a hierarchical clustering algorithm, we identified a cluster of patients characterized by higher leptin values and lower pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ and IL-6) who experienced longer PFS (13.2 vs 8.05 months; HR: 0.42 [0.18-0.93] p = 0.02) and OS (18.04 vs 12.09 mo; HR: 0.53 [0.25-1.29] p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Adipokines can play a crucial role to determining effectiveness of anti-cancer immunotherapy. The role of metabolic immune dysfunctions needs further pre-clinical validation and is currently investigated in the larger prospective cohort.

YAP1 expression is associated with survival and immunosuppression in small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy is considered a major breakthrough in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), although its anti-tumor efficacy is limited. With a high degree of malignancy and high heterogeneity, SCLC is difficult to treat in the clinic. A new combination strategy is urgently needed to further improve the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with SCLC. By immunofluorescence, 100 SCLC patients in a local cohort were classified into the SCLC-A (high ASCL1 expression; n = 36), SCLC-N (high NEUROD1 expression; n = 32), SCLC-P (high POU2F3 expression; n = 14), and SCLC-Y (high YAP1 expression; n = 18) subtypes. Each SCLC molecular subtype represented different prognoses, tumor microenvironment traits, and immunotherapy sensitivities. Analysis of both the local and public cohorts suggested that the SCLC-Y subtype exhibited the worst clinical outcome (p < 0.05) when compared with other subtypes. SCLC with high YAP1 expression was characterized by high PD-L1 expression, high stromal score, T-cell functional impairment, and a close relationship with immune-related pathways. YAP1 upregulated PD-L1 expression and suppressed T cell activation, thus leading to immune evasion. In in vitro experiments, blockade of YAP1 promoted cancer cell apoptosis, immune cell proliferation, T-cell activation, and cytotoxic T-cell infiltration, thus further potentiating the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with the SCLC-Y subtype.

Remarkable response to PD-1 inhibitor in a patient with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a case report and literature review

We report a case of a 59-year-old male diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). He received first-line platinum doublet chemotherapy and second-line topotecan-based regimen, but experienced disease progression after each line of therapy. He was then treated with Sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, in combination with nab-paclitaxel in the third-line setting, which resulted in significant tumor shrinkage. Restaging scans showed a partial response per RECIST criteria with 62% reduction in tumor burden. This case highlights the application and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in extensive-stage SCLC.

Trends in the epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch nationwide population-based study over 1989-2020

INTRODUCTION

This study describes the evolving characteristics of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) from 1989 to 2020 in the Netherlands to analyse how the population of patients with SCLC has changed in the last decades, hypothesising that this might explain the little progress made in SCLC.

METHODS

Patients with SCLC diagnosed from 1989 to 2020 were selected from the Dutch cancer registry. Incidence, patient and disease characteristics, treatments, and overall survival (OS) were analysed. Joinpoint analyses were used to test annual percentage changes for statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 52,527 patients were diagnosed with SCLC. The absolute numbers of patients with SCLC remained equal over the years; however, the incidence rates decreased from 15.01 to 8.93 per 100,000 person-years. The proportion of women increased from 22% to 50%, and those aged ≥75 years increased from 20% to 25%. The latter coincided with a higher proportion receiving only the best supportive care (BSC) over the years (18-24%). The use of surgery in stage I increased from 2% to 37%. The proportion of patients diagnosed with stage IV increased from 46% to 70% due to better staging. The OS improved for all stages, with a 2-year OS rate for stage IV doubling from 3% to 6%.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of SCLC has significantly decreased over the last 30 years, with an increasing proportion of elderly and women. The male-female ratio became similar, and the OS improved. As a consequence of more elderly and probably more vulnerable patients, more patients received only the BSC.

Multi-dimensional characterization of immunological profiles in small cell lung cancer uncovers clinically relevant immune subtypes with distinct prognoses and therapeutic vulnerabilities

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is generally considered a 'homogenous' disease, with little documented inter-tumor heterogeneity in treatment guidance or prognosis evaluation. The precise identification of clinically relevant molecular subtypes remains incomplete and their translation into clinical practice is limited. In this retrospective cohort study, we comprehensively characterized the immune microenvironment in SCLC by integrating transcriptional and protein profiling of formalin-fixation-and-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 29 patients. We identified two distinct disease subtypes: immune-enriched (IE-subtype) and immune-deprived (ID-subtype), displaying heterogeneity in immunological, biological, and clinical features. The IE-subtype was characterized by abundant immune infiltrate and elevated levels of interferon-alpha/gamma (IFNα/IFNγ) and inflammatory response, while the ID-subtype featured a complete lack of immune infiltration and a more proliferative phenotype. These two immune subtypes are associated with clinical benefits in SCLC patients treated with adjuvant therapy, with the IE-subtype exhibiting a more favorable response leading to improved survival and reduced disease recurrence risk. Additionally, we identified and validated a personalized prognosticator of immunophenotyping, the CCL5/CXCL9 chemokine index (CCI), using machine learning. The CCI demonstrated superior predictive abilities for prognosis and clinical benefits in SCLC patients, validated in our institute immunohistochemistry cohort and multicenter bulk transcriptomic data cohorts. In conclusion, our study provides a comprehensive and multi-dimensional characterization of the immune architecture of SCLC using clinical FFPE samples and proposes a new immune subtyping conceptual framework enabling risk stratification and the appropriate selection of individualized therapy.

Efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in treating patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Despite numerous immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens available for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), it remains unclear which regimen is the most effective and safest; relative studies comparing such regimens are scarce.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy combinations with chemotherapy for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. In addition, for the first time, comparisons among the first-line systemic regimens on OS and PFS in ES-SCLC by each time node were made.

Methods

Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Google Scholars, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and major international conferences were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding comparing immunotherapy combinations with chemotherapy as first-line treatments for patients with advanced ES-SCLC from inception to 1 November. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were generated for dichotomous variants by RStudio 4.2.1. The outcomes comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs).

Results

Eventually, a total of nine RCTs reporting 4,352 individuals with nine regimens were enrolled. The regimens were ipilimumabnu (Ipi), atezolizumab (Atez), durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Durv-Trem), durvalumab (Durv), pembrolizumab (Pemb), adebrelimab (Adeb), serplulimab (Serp), atezolizumab plus tiragolumab (Atez-Tira), and nivolumab (Nivo). With regard to OS, serplulimab (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.81) was found to yield the best OS benefit when compared with chemotherapy. Meanwhile, serplulimab had the highest probability (46.11%) for better OS. Furthermore, compared with chemotherapy, serplulimab significantly increased the OS rate from the 6th to the 21st month. With regard to PFS, serplulimab (HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.38 to 0.59) was found to yield the best PFS benefit when compared with chemotherapy. Simultaneously, serplulimab had the highest probability (94.48%) for better PFS. Serplulimab was also a long-lasting first-line regimen in both OS and PFS from a longitudinal perspective. In addition, there was no significant difference among the various treatment options for ORR and grade ≥3 AEs.

Conclusion

Considering OS, PFS, ORR, and safety profiles, serplulimab with chemotherapy should be recommended as the best therapy for patients with ES-SCLC. Certainly, more head-to-head studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022373291.

Management of Very Early Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Canadian Survey Study

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard of care for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Local therapy-surgery or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)-with adjuvant chemotherapy may be appropriate for very early (T1-T2, N0) disease. There is variability in the management of these cases, which may lead to variability in patient outcomes. This study aimed to determine practice patterns for the management of very early LS-SCLC in Canada. A survey was developed and distributed to Canadian medical and radiation oncologists specialising in lung cancer. The survey consisted of three sections: (1) physician demographics, (2) general practice approach, and (3) preferred approach for three clinical scenarios (1: peripheral T1 lesion; 2: central T1 lesion; 3: peripheral T2 lesion). Responses were analysed to detect differences across cases and among physician groups. There were 77 respondents. In case 1, assuming medical operability, most respondents (73%) chose surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, with 19% choosing CRT. CRT was selected by a higher proportion in case 2 (48%) and case 3 (61%) (p < 0.05). If medically inoperable, most chose CRT over local therapy in all cases, with more choosing CRT in case 2 (84%) and case 3 (86%) than in case 1 (55%) (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed a predilection towards CRT in Western Canada and among more experienced physicians, and towards SBRT in Ontario. There is variability in the management of very early LS-SCLC in Canada. CRT remains the most popular strategy in most cases, with surgery preferred for small peripheral lesions. Larger and more central tumours are more likely to be managed with CRT. Variation in practice is correlated with region and physician experience. Our study illustrates the variability in the management of very early LS-SCLC in Canada and highlights the need for more robust investigations into the ideal approach for these patients.

Small-Cell Lung Cancer-An Update on Targeted and Immunotherapies

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with distinct biological and clinical features. The clinical course of SCLC is generally characterised by initial sensitivity to DNA-damaging therapies, followed by early relapse and broad cross resistance to second line agents. Whilst there has been an enormous expansion of effective targeted and immune-based therapeutic options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the last decade, little improvement has been achieved in SCLC treatment and survival due, at least in part, to underappreciated inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Here we review the current treatment paradigm of SCLC including recent advances made in utilizing immunotherapy and the challenges of identifying a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response. We examine emerging new targeted therapies, combination immunotherapy and future directions of SCLC treatment research.

Indirect treatment comparison of lurbinectedin versus other second-line treatments for small-cell lung cancer

Aim: Compare lurbinectedin versus other second-line (2L) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treatments. Methods: An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison connected the platinum-sensitive SCLC cohort of a single-arm lurbinectedin trial to a network of three randomized controlled trials (oral and intravenous [IV] topotecan, and platinum re-challenge) identified by systematic literature review. Network meta-analysis methods estimated relative treatment effects. Results: In platinum-sensitive patients, lurbinectedin demonstrated a survival benefit and favorable safety profile versus oral and IV topotecan and platinum re-challenge (overall survival, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.43; 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.27, 0.67; HR: 0.43; 95% CrI: 0.26, 0.70; HR: 0.42; 95% CrI: 0.30, 0.58 respectively). Conclusion: Lurbinectedin showed a robust survival benefit and favorable safety versus other SCLC treatments in 2L platinum-sensitive SCLC.

The Role of Surgery in Stage I Small Cell Lung Cancer: A National VA Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Historically, limited stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) has been treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CRT). While current NCCN guidelines recommend consideration of lobectomy in node-negative cT1-T2 SCLC, data regarding the role of surgery in very limited SCLC is lacking.

METHODS

Data from the National VA Cancer Cube were compiled. A total of 1,028 patients with pathologically confirmed stage I SCLC were studied. Only 661 patients that either received surgery or CRT were included. Interval-censored Weibull and Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate median overall survival (OS) and hazard ratio (HR), respectively. Two survival curves were compared by a Wald test. Subset analysis was performed based on the location of the tumor in the upper vs. lower lobe as delineated by ICD-10 codes C34.1 and C34.3.

RESULTS

Four-hundred and forty-six patients received concurrent CRT; while 223 underwent treatment that contained surgery (93 surgery only, 87 surgery/chemo, 39 surgery/chemo/radiation and 4 surgery/radiation). The median OS for the surgery-inclusive treatment was 3.87 years (95% CI 3.21-4.48) while median OS for the CRT cohort was 2.45 years (95% CI 2.17-2.74). HR of death for surgery-inclusive treatment when compared to CRT is 0.67 (95% CI 0.55-0.81; P < .001). Subset analysis based on the location of the tumor in both the upper or lower lobes showed improved survival with surgery as compared to CRT regardless of the location. HR for the upper lobe was 0.63 (95% CI 0.50-0.80; P < .001) and lower lobe 0.61 (95% CI 0.42-0.87; P = .006). Multivariable regression analysis accounting for age and ECOG-PS shows a HR 0.60 (95% CI 0.43-0.83; P = .002) favoring surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery was used in less than a third of patients with stage I SCLC who received treatment. Surgery-inclusive multimodality treatment was associated with a longer overall survival as compared to chemoradiation, independent of age, performance status or tumor location. Our study suggests a more expansive role for surgery in stage I SCLC.

Clinical impact of first-line PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients: A real-world multicenter propensity score-matched study

OBJECTIVES

Our research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with etoposide and platinum (EP) for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and identify prognostic factors, as real-world outcomes and the inconsistency of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are uncertain.

METHODS

We selected ES-SCLC patients in three centers and conducted a propensity score-matched analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were conducted to compare the survival outcomes. We also performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to investigate predictors.

RESULTS

Among 236 patients included, 83 pairs of cases were matched. The EP plus ICIs cohort had a longer median overall survival (OS) (17.3 months) than the EP cohort (13.4 months) (hazard ratio [HR],  0.61 [0.45, 0.83]; p = 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was also longer in the EP plus ICIs cohort (8.3 months) than in the EP cohort (5.9 months) (HR,   0.44 [0.32, 0.60]; p < 0.001). The EP plus ICIs group had a higher objective response rate (ORR) (EP: 62.3%, EP + ICIs: 84.3%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis presented that liver metastases (HR, 2.08; p = 0.018) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) (HR, 0.54; p = 0.049) were independent prognostic factors for OS, and performance status (PS) (HR, 2.11; p = 0.015), liver metastases (HR, 2.64; p = 0.002), and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR, 0.45; p = 0.028) were for PFS in patients with chemo-immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our real-world data demonstrated that ICIs with chemotherapy as the first-line setting for ES-SCLC are effective and safe. PS, liver metastases, and inflammatory markers could serve as valuable risk factors.

Rare thoracic cancers: a comprehensive overview of diagnosis and management of small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymic epithelial tumours

Despite the progress in outcomes seen with immunotherapy in various malignancies, including nonsmall cell lung cancer, the benefits are less in small cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymic epithelial tumours. New effective treatment options are needed, guided via more in-depth insights into the pathophysiology of these rare malignancies. This review comprehensively presents an overview of the clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, staging systems, pathophysiology and treatment options for these rare thoracic cancers. In addition, opportunities for further improvement of therapies are discussed.