Induced hypertension as an approach to treating acute cerebrovascular ischaemia: possibilities and limitations

Pressor therapy in acute ischaemic stroke: an updated systematic review

Background

Low blood pressure (BP) in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is associated with poor functional outcome, death, or severe disability. Increasing BP might benefit patients with post-stroke hypotension including those with potentially salvageable ischaemic penumbra. This updated systematic review considers the present evidence regarding the use of vasopressors in AIS.

Methods

We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE and trial databases using a structured search strategy. We examined reference lists of relevant publications for additional studies examining BP elevation in AIS.

Results

We included 27 studies involving 1886 patients. Nine studies assessed increasing BP during acute reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, intra-arterial thrombolysis or combined). Eighteen studies tested BP elevation alone. Phenylephrine was the most commonly used agent to increase BP (n = 16 studies), followed by norepinephrine (n = 6), epinephrine (n = 3) and dopamine (n = 2). Because of small patient numbers and study heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not possible. Overall, BP elevation was feasible in patients with fluctuating or worsening neurological symptoms, large vessel occlusion with labile BP, sustained post-stroke hypotension and ineligible for intravenous thrombolysis or after acute reperfusion therapy. The effects on functional outcomes were largely unknown and close monitoring is advised if such intervention is undertaken.

Conclusion

Although theoretical arguments support increasing BP to improve cerebral blood flow and sustain the ischaemic penumbra in selected AIS patients, the data are limited and results largely inconclusive. Large, randomised controlled trials are needed to identify the optimal BP target, agent, duration of treatment and effects on clinical outcomes.

Hemodynamics in acute stroke: Cerebral and cardiac complications

Hemodynamics is the study of blood flow, where parameters have been defined to quantify blood flow and the relationship with systemic circulatory changes. Understanding these perfusion parameters, the relationship between different blood flow variables and the implications for ischemic injury are outlined in the ensuing discussion. This chapter focuses on the hemodynamic changes that occur in ischemic stroke, and their contribution to ischemic stroke pathophysiology. We discuss the interaction between cardiovascular response and hemodynamic changes in stroke. Studying hemodynamic changes has a key role in stroke prevention, therapeutic implications and prognostic importance in acute ischemic stroke: preexisting hemodynamic and autoregulatory impairments predict the occurrence of stroke. Hemodynamic failure predisposes to the formation of thromboemboli and accelerates infarction due to impairing compensatory mechanisms. In ischemic stroke involving occlusion of a large vessel, persistent collateral circulation leads to preservation of ischemic penumbra and therefore justifying endovascular thrombectomy. Following thrombectomy, impaired autoregulation may lead to reperfusion injury and hemorrhage.

Blood Pressure and Penumbral Sustenance in Stroke from Large Vessel Occlusion

The global burden of stroke remains high, and of the various subtypes of stroke, large vessel occlusions (LVOs) account for the largest proportion of stroke-related death and disability. Several randomized controlled trials in 2015 changed the landscape of stroke care worldwide, with endovascular thrombectomy (ET) now the standard of care for all eligible patients. With the proven success of this therapy, there is a renewed focus on penumbral sustenance. In this review, we describe the ischemic penumbra, collateral circulation, autoregulation, and imaging assessment of the penumbra. Blood pressure goals in acute stroke remain controversial, and we review the current data and suggest an approach for induced hypertension in the acute treatment of patients with LVOs. Finally, in addition to reperfusion and enhanced perfusion, efforts focused on developing therapeutic targets that afford neuroprotection and augment neural repair will gain increasing importance. ET has revolutionized stroke care, and future emphasis will be placed on promoting penumbral sustenance, which will increase patient eligibility for this highly effective therapy and reduce overall stroke-related death and disability.

Feasibility and Safety of Using External Counterpulsation to Augment Cerebral Blood Flow in Acute Ischemic Stroke-The Counterpulsation to Upgrade Forward Flow in Stroke (CUFFS) Trial

BACKGROUND

External counterpulsation (ECP) increases perfusion to a variety of organs and may be helpful for acute stroke.

METHODS

We conducted a single-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled feasibility and safety trial of ECP for acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke. Twenty-three patients presenting within 48 hours of symptom onset were randomized into one of two groups. One group was treated with ECP for 1 hour at a pressure of up to 300 mmHg ("full pressure"). During the procedure, we also determined the highest possible pressure that would augment MCA mean flow velocity (MFV) by 15%. The other group was treated with ECP at 75 mmHg ("sham pressure"). Transcranial Doppler MCA flow velocities and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of both groups were checked before, during, and after ECP. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days after randomization.

RESULTS

Although the procedures were feasible to implement, there was a frequent inability to augment MFV by 15% despite maximal pressures in full-pressure patients. In sham-pressure patients, however, MFV frequently increased as shown by increases in peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity. In both groups, starting ECP was often associated with contemporaneous improvements in NIHSS stroke scores. There were no between-group differences in NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale Scores, and Barthel Indices, and no device or treatment-related serious adverse events, deaths, intracerebral hemorrhages, or episodes of acute neuro-worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

ECP was safe and feasible to use in patients with acute ischemic stroke. It was associated with unexpected effects on flow velocity, and contemporaneous improvements in NIHSS score regardless of pressure used, with a possibility that even very low ECP pressures had an effect. Further study is warranted.

Interventions for deliberately altering blood pressure in acute stroke

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether blood pressure should be altered actively during the acute phase of stroke. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1997, and previously updated in 2001 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness of altering blood pressure in people with acute stroke, and the effect of different vasoactive drugs on blood pressure in acute stroke.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched in February 2014), the Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews (CDSR) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 2), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1966 to May 2014), EMBASE (Ovid) (1974 to May 2014), Science Citation Index (ISI, Web of Science, 1981 to May 2014) and the Stroke Trials Registry (searched May 2014).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of interventions that aimed to alter blood pressure compared with control in participants within one week of acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted data. The review authors cross-checked data and resolved discrepancies by discussion to reach consensus. We obtained published and unpublished data where available.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 26 trials involving 17,011 participants (8497 participants were assigned active therapy and 8514 participants received placebo/control). Not all trials contributed to each outcome. Most data came from trials that had a wide time window for recruitment; four trials gave treatment within six hours and one trial within eight hours. The trials tested alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (A2AA), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), nitric oxide (NO) donors, thiazide-like diuretics, and target-driven blood pressure lowering. One trial tested phenylephrine.At 24 hours after randomisation oral ACEIs reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP, mean difference (MD) -8 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI) -17 to 1) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP, MD -3 mmHg, 95% CI -9 to 2), sublingual ACEIs reduced SBP (MD -12.00 mm Hg, 95% CI -26 to 2) and DBP (MD -2, 95%CI -10 to 6), oral ARA reduced SBP (MD -1 mm Hg, 95% CI -3 to 2) and DBP (MD -1 mm Hg, 95% CI -3 to 1), oral beta blockers reduced SBP (MD -14 mm Hg; 95% CI -27 to -1) and DBP (MD -1 mm Hg, 95% CI -9 to 7), intravenous (iv) beta blockers reduced SBP (MD -5 mm Hg, 95% CI -18 to 8) and DBP (-5 mm Hg, 95% CI -13 to 3), oral CCBs reduced SBP (MD -13 mmHg, 95% CI -43 to 17) and DBP (MD -6 mmHg, 95% CI -14 to 2), iv CCBs reduced SBP (MD -32 mmHg, 95% CI -65 to 1) and DBP (MD -13, 95% CI -31 to 6), NO donors reduced SBP (MD -12 mmHg, 95% CI -19 to -5) and DBP (MD -3, 95% CI -4 to -2) while phenylephrine, non-significantly increased SBP (MD 21 mmHg, 95% CI -13 to 55) and DBP (MD 1 mmHg, 95% CI -15 to 16).Blood pressure lowering did not reduce death or dependency either by drug class (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.05), stroke type (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.05) or time to treatment (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.05). Treatment within six hours of stroke appeared effective in reducing death or dependency (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.99) but not death (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.26) at the end of the trial. Although death or dependency did not differ between people who continued pre-stroke antihypertensive treatment versus those who stopped it temporarily (worse outcome with continuing treatment, OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.24), disability scores at the end of the trial were worse in participants randomised to continue treatment (Barthel Index, MD -3.2, 95% CI -5.8, -0.6).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence that lowering blood pressure during the acute phase of stroke improves functional outcome. It is reasonable to withhold blood pressure-lowering drugs until patients are medically and neurologically stable, and have suitable oral or enteral access, after which drugs can than be reintroduced. In people with acute stroke, CCBs, ACEI, ARA, beta blockers and NO donors each lower blood pressure while phenylephrine probably increases blood pressure. Further trials are needed to identify which people are most likely to benefit from early treatment, in particular whether treatment started very early is beneficial.

Vasoactive drugs for acute stroke

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether blood pressure (BP) should be altered actively during the acute phase of stroke.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of lowering or elevating BP in people with acute stroke, and the effect of different vasoactive drugs on BP in acute stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched June 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2009), EMBASE (1980 to October 2009), and Science Citation Index (1981 to October 2009).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials of interventions that would be expected, on pharmacological grounds, to alter BP in patients within one week of the onset of acute stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied the trial inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 131 trials involving in excess of 18,000 patients; a further 13 trials are ongoing. We obtained data for 43 trials (7649 patients). Among BP-lowering trials, beta receptor antagonists lowered BP (early systolic BP (SBP) mean difference (MD) -6.1 mmHg, 95% CI -11.4 to -0.9; late SBP MD -4.9 mmHg, 95% CI -10.2 to 0.4; late diastolic BP (DBP) MD -4.5 mmHg, 95% CI -7.8 to -1.2). Oral calcium channel blockers (CCB) lowered BP (late SBP MD -3.2 mmHg, 95% CI -5.4 to -1.1; early DBP MD -2.5, 95% CI -5.6 to 0.7; late DBP MD -2.1, 95% CI -3.5 to -0.7). Nitric oxide donors lowered BP (early SBP MD -10.3 mmHg, 95% CI -17.6 to -3.0). Prostacyclin lowered BP (late SBP MD, -7.7 mmHg, 95% CI -15.6 to 0.2; late DBP MD -3.9 mmHg, 95% CI -8.1 to 0.4). Among BP-increasing trials, diaspirin cross-linked haemoglobin (DCLHb) increased BP (early SBP MD 15.3 mmHg, 95% CI 4.0 to 26.6; late SBP MD 15.9 mmHg, 95% CI 1.8 to 30.0). None of the drug classes significantly altered outcome apart from DCLHb which increased combined death or dependency (odds ratio (OR) 5.41, 95% CI 1.87 to 15.64).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence to evaluate reliably the effect of altering BP on outcome after acute stroke. However, treatment with DCLHb was associated with poor clinical outcomes. Beta receptor antagonists, CCBs, nitric oxide, and prostacyclin each lowered BP during the acute phase of stroke. In contrast, DCLHb increased BP.

Role of vasopressor administration in patients with acute neurologic injury

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacologic blood pressure elevation is often utilized to prevent or treat ischemia in patients with acute neurologic injury, and routinely requires administration of vasopressor agents. Depending on the indication, vasopressor agents may be administered to treat hypotension or to induce hypertension.

METHODS

Although numerous guideline statements exist regarding the management of blood pressure in these patients, most recommendations are based largely on Class III evidence. Further, there are few randomized controlled trials comparing vasopressor agents in these patients and selection is often guided by expert consensus.

RESULTS

We discuss the clinical evidence regarding vasopressor administration for blood pressure management in patients with acute neurologic injury. The effect of various vasopressors on cerebral hemodynamics is also discussed.

CONCLUSION

Although high-quality clinical data are scarce, the available evidence suggests that norepinephrine should be considered as the vasopressor of choice when blood pressure elevation is indicated in patients with acute neurologic injury.

Interventions for deliberately altering blood pressure in acute stroke

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether blood pressure should be altered actively during the acute phase of stroke. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1997, and previously updated in 2001.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of altering blood pressure in people with acute stroke, and the effect of different vasoactive drugs on blood pressure in acute stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched July 2007), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2 2008), MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases, reference lists of relevant publications and contacted researchers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of interventions that aimed to alter blood pressure in patients within one week of acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve trials involving 1153 participants were included (603 participants were assigned active therapy and 550 participants received placebo/control). The trials tested angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARA), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), clonidine, glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), thiazide diuretic and mixed antihypertensive therapy. One trial tested phenylephrine. At 24 hours after randomisation ACEIs reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP, mean difference, MD -6 mmHg, 95% confidence interval, CI -22 to 10) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP, MD -5 mmHg, 95% CI -18 to 7), ARA reduced SBP (MD -3, 95% CI -7 to 2) and DBP (MD -3, 95% CI -6 to 0.4), iv CCBs reduced SBP (MD -32 mmHg, 95% CI -65 to 1) and DBP (MD -13 mmHg, 95% CI -31 to 6), oral CCBs reduced SBP (MD -13 mmHg, 95% , CI -43 to 17) and DBP (MD -6 mmHg, 95% CI -14 to 2), GTN reduced SBP (MD -10 mmHg, 95% CI -18 to -3) and DBP (MD -1 mmHg, 95% CI -5 to 3) while phenylephrine, non-significantly increased SBP (MD 21 mmHg, 95% CI -13 to 55) and DBP (MD 1 mmHg, 95% CI -15 to 16). Functional outcome and death were not altered by any of the drugs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to evaluate the effect of altering blood pressure on outcome during the acute phase of stroke. In patients with acute stroke, CCBs, ACEI, ARA and GTN each lower blood pressure while phenylephrine probably increases blood pressure.

Mild induced hypertension improves blood flow and oxygen metabolism in transient focal cerebral ischemia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In focal ischemic cortex, cerebral blood flow autoregulation is impaired, and perfusion passively follows blood pressure variations. Although it is generally agreed that profound hypotension is harmful in acute stroke, the hemodynamic and metabolic impact of increased blood pressure on the ischemic core and penumbra are less well understood. We, therefore, tested whether pharmacologically induced hypertension improves cerebral blood flow and metabolism and tissue outcome in acute stroke using optical imaging with high spatiotemporal resolution.

METHODS

Cerebral blood flow, oxyhemoglobin, and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen were measured noninvasively using simultaneous multispectral reflectance imaging and laser speckle flowmetry during distal middle cerebral artery occlusion in mice. Hypertension was induced by phenylephrine infusion starting 10 or 60 minutes after ischemia to raise blood pressure by 30% for the duration of ischemia; control groups received saline infusion.

RESULTS

Mild induced hypertension rapidly increased cerebral blood flow, oxyhemoglobin, and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen in both the core and penumbra and prevented the expansion of cerebral blood flow deficit during 1 hour distal middle cerebral artery occlusion. Induced hypertension also diminished the deleterious effects of periinfarct depolarizations on cerebral blood flow, oxyhemoglobin, and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen without altering their frequency. Consistent with this, mild induced hypertension reduced infarct volume by 48% without exacerbating tissue swelling when measured 2 days after 1 hour transient distal middle cerebral artery occlusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that mild induced hypertension increases collateral cerebral blood flow and oxygenation and improves cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen in the core and penumbra, supporting its use as bridging therapy in acute ischemic stroke until arterial recanalization is achieved.

Pressor Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose— Systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels below 140 mm Hg after acute stroke occur in 18% to 25% of patients, and may be associated with adverse outcome, in terms of death and disability. It has thus been proposed that BP elevation in acute ischemic stroke may be beneficial by increasing perfusion to the peri-infarct penumbra, though not only in those with low BP levels.

Methods— All articles studying BP elevation in the context of acute stroke were identified using a structured search strategy.

Results— Two reviewers independently searched the databases, and 12 relevant publications were identified. All identified publications related to acute ischemic stroke and no articles on pressor therapy in primary hemorrhagic stroke were found. The review included 319 subjects (age: 42 to 88 years, 46% male), with phenylephrine being the most commonly used pressor agent, though 8 studies incorporated volume expansion. Because of small numbers, and varying entry/outcome criteria, no meta-analysis of outcome measures was possible. Overall, in these few studies undertaken, pressor therapy in acute stroke appears feasible and well-tolerated. The benefit and risks in terms of clinical outcomes remains unknown, but intensive monitoring is advised if such therapy is undertaken.

Conclusions— Theoretical arguments exist for inducing BP elevation in acute ischemic stroke to increase blood flow to the ischemic penumbra across patients with a broad BP range. To date, there have only been a few small trials with inconclusive results. Many questions are still unanswered about the safety and potential benefits of pressor therapy in acute stroke. Hopefully, ongoing trials will answer some of these important questions.

Ischaemic brain oedema

Ischaemic brain oedema appears to involve two distinct processes, the relative contribution and time course of which depend on the duration and severity of ischaemia, and the presence of reperfusion. The first process involves an increase in tissue Na+ and water content accompanying increased pinocytosis and Na+, K+ ATPase activity across the endothelium. This is apparent during the early phase of infarction and before any structural damage is evident. This phenomenon is augmented by reperfusion. A second process results from a more indiscriminate and delayed BBB breakdown that is associated with infarction of both the parenchyma and the vasculature itself. Although, tissue Na+ level still seems to be the major osmotic force for oedema formation at this second stage, the extravasation of serum proteases is an additional potentially deleterious factor. The relative importance of protease action is not yet clear, however, degradation of the extracellular matrix conceivably leads to further BBB disruption and softening of the tissue, setting the stage for the most pronounced forms of brain swelling. A number of factors mediate or modulate ischaemic oedema formation, however, most current information comes from experimental models, and clinical data on this microcosmic level is lacking. Clinically significant brain oedema develops in a delayed fashion after large hemispheric strokes and is a cause of substantial mortality. Neurological signs appear to be at least as good as direct ICP measurement and neuroimaging in detecting and gauging the secondary damage produced by stroke oedema. The neuroimaging characteristics of the stroke, specifically the early involvement of greater than half of the MCA territory, are, however, highly predictive of the development of severe oedema over the subsequent hours and days. None of the available medical therapies provide substantial relief from the oedema and raised ICP, or at best, they are temporizing in most cases. Hemicraniectomy appears most promising as a method of avoiding death from brain compression, but the optimum timing and manner of patient selection are currently being investigated. All approaches to massive ischaemic brain swelling are clouded by the potential for survival with poor functional outcome. It is possible to manage blood pressure, serum osmolarity by way of selective fluid administration, and a number of other systemic factors that exaggerate brain oedema. Broad guidelines for treatment of stroke oedema can therefore be given at this time.

Intensive care unit management of the stroke patient

Although the majority of patients with acute stroke do not require intensive care, it is important to recognize when admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) is warranted. Patients undergoing thrombolytic therapy, those with brainstem infarcts referable to the basilar artery, those with large space occupying hemispheric infarcts, and those with fluctuating neurological examinations should be admitted to the ICU for monitoring and treatment.

Induced hypertension treatment to improve cerebral ischemic injury after transient forebrain ischemia

The effect of induced hypertension treatment on cerebral ischemia is still controversial. We investigated the preferred blood pressure manipulation level and pressor agent required to reduce cerebral ischemic injury following transient forebrain ischemia induced by bilateral occlusion of the common carotid arteries in anesthetized gerbils. Following 60-min cerebral ischemia, we evaluated the preferred blood pressure manipulation level and pressor agent required to treat cerebral ischemic injury after reperfusion by examining the effects of different levels of mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), increased with phenylephrine or angiotensin II or decreased by blood withdrawal, on cerebral blood flow (CBF), survival ratio, cerebral edema, and brain energy metabolism following transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils. Mild phenylephrine-induced hypertension treatment (21+/-4 mmHg) during post-cerebral ischemia-reperfusion improved the survival ratio and reduced cerebral edema, which was also associated with an increase in local CBF and a recovery of brain energy metabolism. However, intense phenylephrine-induced hypertension, angiotensin II-induced hypertension, or hypotension worsen the survival rate and produced extra cerebral edema, that were also associated with deterioration of brain energy metabolism. These results demonstrate that a mild induced hypertension with phenylephrine (21+/-4 mmHg above the baseline level) results in reduction of the cerebral edema and improves the survival ratio and brain energy metabolism. Furthermore, angiotensin II may have neurotoxic effect to use as the pressor agent for induced hypertension after cerebral ischemia.

Pharmacological elevation of blood pressure in acute stroke. Clinical effects and safety

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lowering of blood pressure can adversely affect ischemic symptoms in acute stroke. The aim of our study was to determine whether induced hypertension in stroke is safe and to examine its effects on neurological deficits in patients presenting with acute cerebral ischemia.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients admitted to our neurological intensive care unit with the diagnosis of ischemic stroke over a 2.5-year period. Thirty-three patients were not given a pressor agent (Ph- group), while 30 were treated with phenylephrine (Ph+ group) in an attempt to improve cerebral perfusion.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics showed few differences between the Ph+ and Ph- groups. Intracerebral hemorrhage, brain edema, cardiac morbidity, and mortality were not increased in the Ph+ group. In 10 of 30 Ph+ patients, a systolic blood pressure threshold was identified below which ischemic deficits worsened and above which deficits improved. The mean threshold was 156 mm Hg (range, 120 to 190 mm Hg). The mean number of stenotic/occluded cerebral arteries was greater in those Ph+ patients with an identified clinical blood pressure threshold (mean, 2.1 per patient) than in Ph+ patients without a threshold (mean, 1.2 per patient; P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that careful use of phenylephrine induced hypertension is not associated with an increase in morbidity or mortality in acute stroke. Although based on a retrospective analysis of clinical practice, this report suggests that a subset of patients, particularly those with multiple stenosis of cerebral arteries, may improve neurologically upon elevation of the blood pressure.

Duration threshold of induced hypertension on cerebral blood flow, energy metabolism, and edema after transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils

We have investigated whether there is a duration threshold for the effects of phenylephrine-induced hypertension on CBF, brain energy metabolism, and cerebral parenchymal specific gravity (SG) following transient forebrain ischemia in gerbils. Sixty gerbils were randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups: one control group and three groups subjected to an increase of 25 mm Hg in MABP induced by treatment, 30 min after reperfusion, with phenylephrine for 15 min, 30 min, or 60 min. The local CBF was measured continuously, and the SG was evaluated 120 min after reperfusion. Sequential changes in brain energy metabolism, as shown by the ratio of phosphocreatine to inorganic phosphate (Pi), the beta-ATP/Pi ratio, and intracellular pH, were also measured. The 15-min induced hypertension regimen was most suited to the recovery of brain energy metabolism, which was associated with an increase in local CBF and a decrease in cerebral edema. These results demonstrate that a suitable duration can be chosen to optimize the beneficial effects of phenylephrine-induced hypertension on ischemic brain injury following transient forebrain ischemia.