Diphtheria antitoxin titres six years after basic immunization of adults

Evaluation of diphtheria convalescent patients to serve as donors for the production of anti-diphtheria immunoglobulin preparations

AIMS

The study was conducted to evaluate the possibility of selecting convalescent diphtheria patients to serve in emergency situations as donors for the production of anti-diphtheria immunoglobulin. To select suitable donors, the criterion of an antitoxin titer >/=3.0 IU/ml was used. In addition, the effects of treatment and the effect of immunization with diphtheria toxoid on the level of anti-diphtheria toxin antibodies were evaluated.

SCOPE

Three groups of diphtheria patients were included in the study. The first group (n = 23) consisted of patients who had a basic antibiotic treatment, with or without serotherapy using horse antitoxin and/or human immunoglobulin. The second group (n = 12) comprised patients examined immediately after the onset of disease. The immunological history of this group was not known. The third group (n = 20) included patients with a known immunization history, treated only with antibiotics but having received a booster immunization with diphtheria toxoid. Antitoxin titers were measured using the toxin binding inhibition (ToBI) assay.

CONCLUSIONS

In the first group, 47.8% (11/23) of the patients had a diphtheria antibody titer >/=3.0 IU/ml. For most of them, however, the antibody titers could have resulted from treatment with exogenous antibodies from horse antitoxin or human immunoglobulin (18/23). Only two of the 11 high-titer subjects had received antibiotics only. Among the second group, only two (16.76%) of the patients had an antibody titer of >/=3.0 IU/ml. In the third group 50% (10/20) of the patients showed an antibody titer of >/=3.0 IU/ml prior to vaccination, and therefore could be directly considered as donors. Three weeks after booster vaccination, 70% (14/20) had an antibody titer of >/=3.0 IU/ml and 1 year after booster vaccination, 28.6% (2/7) of the subjects still had titers of >/=3.0 IU/ml. In 40% of these patients, a decrease was observed 3-4 weeks after the booster dose. It was concluded that convalescent diphtheria patients could be considered as donors in an emergency situation, since approximately half of them showed antitoxin titers of >/=3.0 IU/ml.

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a single dose of a diphtheria--tetanus--acellular pertussis component vaccine (DTaP) compared to a diphtheria--tetanus toxoid (Td) and a diphtheria toxoid vaccine (d) in adults

We compared immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a single dose of DTaP vaccine (containing tetanus and diphtheria toxoids and four acellular pertussis antigens) with conventional Td- or d-vaccines in 180 German adults. Antibody values against diphtheria and tetanus toxin and against the pertussis antigens fimbriae (FIM), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and pertussis toxin (PT) were measured in pre- and post-immunization sera. Reactogenicity was determined by a patient diary card. Pre-immunization antibody values against diphtheria toxin were low in all three vaccine groups. After immunization, > or = 80% of the vaccinees in all three groups were fully protected (> or = 0.1 IU/ml), but geometric mean values were significantly higher in DTaP recipients compared to Td or d recipients (1.65 vs. 0.44 and 0.48, respectively; both P < 0.05). Pre-immunization antibody values against tetanus toxin were high in all three groups, and after immunization 100% of the vaccinees were protected (> or = 0.1 IU/ml). Furthermore, substantial antibody responses against pertussis antigens were elicited in DTaP recipients with geometric mean rises of 22.5, 4.1 and 7.5 for antibodies against FHA, fimbriae and PT, respectively. All three vaccines were well tolerated. Frequency and severity of local reactions were similar between DTaP and Td recipients and even less common in d recipients. Since DTaP did provide a significant boost of anti-pertussis antibodies and a significantly higher anti-diphtheria response than conventional Td vaccine without an increase of side effects, it might be an appropriate candidate for use in adults.

Evaluation of single- and dual antigen delayed fluorescence immunoassay in comparison to an ELISA and the in vivo toxin neutralisation test for detection of diphtheria toxin antibodies

An evaluation of the delayed fluorescence immunoassay (Delfia) against an ELISA method for determination of diphtheria antitoxin levels in serum was performed. The Delfia was also validated in the in vivo toxin neutralisation test (Txn) in rabbits. Two variants of the Delfia were studied, a single-antigen Delfia (sDelfia) with only the diphtheria toxin included and a dual-antigen Delfia (dDelfia) with tetanus toxoid included for simultaneous detection of antibodies against two antigens. The diphtheria antitoxin cut-off levels in the sDelfia and the dDelfia were 0.004 and 0.002 AU/ml, respectively, which is lower than the internationally accepted level showing any protection against diphtheria (0.01 IU/ml). Both Delfia variants showed good correlation with the ELISA procedure above the ELISA cut-off level of 0.02 AU/ml. Results from samples assayed in the in vivo Txn assay indicated that the low antitoxin levels detected by the Delfia were valid. These results show that the Delfia could be considered as an in vitro reference method for detection of diphtheria antitoxin in seroepidemiological surveys and vaccine studies.

Immunity to diphtheria in a sample of the Canadian adult population

OBJECTIVE

To assess immunity to diphtheria in a sample of Canadian adults.

DESIGN

A seroprevalence study of a group of plasmapheresis donors was performed over a four-month period in 1996. A convenience sample of 1619 sera was collected to obtain a good distribution by age groups and centres. The determination of diphtheria antitoxin concentrations was performed by neutralization of diphtheria toxin in cell culture.

SUBJECTS

A total of 1619 plasmapheresis donors from Halifax, Quebec City, London, Calgary and Edmonton were studied.

RESULTS

Of the 1619 sera, 20.3% tested showed susceptibility to diphtheria (antitoxin concentration less than 0.01 IU/mL). The proportion of susceptibles increased from 9.5% in subjects 30 to 39 years of age to 36.3% in those 60 years of age or more. The age group 20 to 29 years demonstrated a higher proportion of susceptibles (18.3%) than the next age group (30 to 39 years) in four of the five centres. Significant differences in antibody levels were also observed among the centres. There was no statistically significant difference between sexes.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, detectable antibody and presumably immunity to diphtheria in the present sample of Canadian adults is relatively good. However, reason(s) for the relatively high proportion of susceptibles in those aged 20 to 29 years of age in certain centres, as well as why Canada has not experienced any diphtheria outbreaks in the past 20 years given these susceptibility levels, should be investigated further.