Microbial Diagnosis by Nucleic Acid Sandwich Hybridization

Nucleic acid analysis by sandwich hybridization

One of the most significant achievements of the biochemist during the past two decades is the use to which immunologically based assays have been put in clinical diagnosis (Hood et al.: Immunology, 1984). The problem faced and surmounted by immunologists in effecting the transition from research tool to routine clinical assay bears a remarkable similarity to that confronting the molecular biologist today; i.e., how can nucleic acid hybridization, a technique of obvious potential (Meinkoth and Wahl: Anal Biochem 138:267-284, 1984; Syvanen: Med Biol 64:313-324, 1986; Matthews and Kricka: Anal Biochem 169:1-25, 1988), be modified in order to fulfill all necessary parameters of a routine diagnostic assay? There are several such requirements, and the importance placed on each depends on the objectives of the assay: the technique must be sensitive, specific, and reproducible. Other advantages would be cost-effectiveness, ease of manipulation, and amenability to automation. Ideally, the signal detection should be based on a non-radioactive system, because of the instability of probes labelled with isotopes like 32p, and the potential hazards involved in their handling and disposal. The sandwich hybridization for the analysis of nucleic acid sequences was first used in 1977 (Dunn and Hassell: Cell 12:23-36, 1977), but its potential as a diagnostic assay was not realized until 1983, when it was applied to the detection of adenovirus DNA in nasopharyngeal aspirates from children with acute respiratory infection (Ranki et al: Gene 21:77-85, 1983). It has since been modified and used not only for the detection of microbial infection (Virtanen et al.: Lancet i:381-383, 1983; Ranki et al.: Cur Top Microbiol Immunol 104:307-318, 1983; Lehtomaki et al.: J Clin Microbiol 24:108-111, 1986; Virtanen et al.: J Clin Microbiol 20:1083-1088, 1984; Palva and Ranki: Clin Lab Med 5:475-490, 1985; Polsky-Cynkin et al.: Clin Chem 31:1438-1443, 1985; Parkkinen et al.: J Med Virol 20:279-288, 1986; Palva: FEMS Microbiol Lett 28:85-91, 1985; Palva et al: FEMS Microbiol Lett 23:83-89, 1984; Zolg et al.: Mol Biochem Parasitol 22:145-151, 1987; Palva: J Clin Microbiol 18:92-100, 1983), but also for the analysis of nucleotide sequence variations (Langdale and Malcolm: Gene 36:201-210, 1985). We will discuss the development of the sandwich technique and the advantages it conveys over the more conventional nucleic acid hybridization formats, together with new developments which will ensure that it earns a place alongside immunoassay in the diagnostic laboratory.

Screening of premalignant cervical lesions for HPV 16 DNA by sandwich and in situ hybridization techniques

A series of 97 cervical smears and 69 directed punch biopsies derived from 84 consecutive women prospectively followed-up for cervical HPV (human papillomavirus) infections were studied using the sandwich hybridization and in situ hybridization techniques with HPV 16 DNA probes. The aim was to test the sensitivity and applicability of these two techniques in routine diagnosis of cervical HPV infections from smears. As a measure of specimen adequacy, the number of cells recovered in the cervical scrape was determined along with HPV 16 DNA in the sandwich hybridization test using human pro-alpha 2(I)-collagen gene probe. CIN (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) was suggested in 56% of the patients by the Pap smear, and disclosed in 65% of the biopsies. HPV 16 DNA was present in 57% of cervical scrapes consistent with CIN, i.e., were of Pap smear classes III or IV. Forty percent of the scrapes not suggestive of CIN, i.e., Pap smear classes I or II, also contained HPV 16 DNA. The detection rate for HPV 16 DNA of the sandwich hybridization method was 89% of that of the in situ method in adequate scrapes, but only 43% in cell-poor specimens. The number of HPV 16 DNA-positive scrapes as compared with the total number of diagnoses obtained by studying also the biopsies was 31/36 (69 patients). The results indicate that the cervical scrape as a noninvasive specimen is applicable for screening of cervical HPV infections, and it can be studied with acceptable sensitivity by the rapid sandwich hybridization technique. However, if a punch biopsy is indicated it should be studied using the in situ hybridization technique that allows more sensitive detection of HPV DNA than any other hybridization method and enables the analysis of several HPV types in the same sample instead of only one HPV type in the scrapes.

Detection of biotinylated DNA probes by using Eu-labeled streptavidin and time-resolved fluorometry

Europium has been used as a label in immunoassays as it can be measured with high sensitivity by means of time-resolved fluorometry. Here we have used streptavidin labeled with europium chelates in the detection of adenovirus type 2 DNA bound to microtiter wells after hybridization with a biotinylated probe. The method gave quantitative results and a sensitivity of about 10 pg of the specific DNA.

Detection of human papillomavirus DNA by the nucleic acid sandwich hybridization method from cervical scraping

Cervical scrapes collected from 100 consecutive patients participating in a prospective follow-up study for cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infections were tested for the presence of HPV 11 DNA by the nucleic acid sandwich hybridization method, which allows testing the specimens in a crude form. Part of each specimen was processed through phenol extraction and DNA purification to a dot blot hybridization assay. The dot blots were serially hybridized with HPV 6, 11, 16, and 18 probes as well as with an Alu-repeat probe to estimate the number of cells in the specimen. In PAP smears, HPV-infection was suspected in 63 patients whereas in 37 patients the smear was negative. In the first group, the dot blot assay revealed three cases of HPV 11, two of HPV 16, and one of HPV 18 infection. In the second group with normal PAP smear, one additional HPV 18 infection was found. The sandwich hybridization assay detected 5 HPV 11 infections, including the three mentioned above. All HPV DNA-positive samples contained at least 1.6 X 10(6) cells. Since we considered this a prerequisite for successful diagnosis, only 25 specimens in the first group and 15 in the second were adequate specimens. Thus the HPV-DNA detection rate was 32% (8/25) in the first group and 1/15 in the second. This study demonstrates that sandwich hybridization, detecting 1-3 X 10(5) HPV 11 molecules is a reliable diagnostic method. Cervical scrape is a valuable alternative to punch biopsy, but the number of cells collected is critical for the outcome of the assay.