Imaging of lung transplantation

Immunosuppression for lung transplantation

As a result of advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy, and postoperative management, lung transplantation has become an established therapeutic option for individuals with a variety of end-stage lung diseases. The current 1-year actuarial survival rate following lung transplantation is approaching 80%. However, the 5- year actuarial survival rate has remained virtually unchanged at approximately 50% over the last 15 years due to the processes of acute and chronic lung allograft rejection (1). Clinicians still rely on a vast array of immunosuppressive agents to suppress the process of graft rejection, but find themselves limited by an inescapable therapeutic paradox. Insufficient immunosuppression results in graft loss due to rejection, while excess immunosuppression results in increased morbidity and mortality from opportunistic infections and malignancies. Indeed, graft rejection, infection, and malignancy are the three principal causes of mortality for the lung transplant recipient. One should also keep in mind that graft loss in a lung transplant recipient is usually a fatal event, since there is no practical means of long-term mechanical support, and since the prospects of re-transplantation are low, given the shortage of acceptable donor grafts. This chapter reviews the current state of immunosuppressive therapy for lung transplantation and suggests alternative paradigms for the management of future lung transplant recipients.

Immunosuppression for lung transplantation

As a result of advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy, and postoperative management, lung transplantation has become an established therapeutic option for individuals with a variety of end-stage lung diseases. The current 1-year actuarial survival rate following lung transplantation is approximately 75%. However, the processes of acute and chronic lung allograft rejection have limited the long-term success of lung transplantation. Clinicians currently rely on a vast armamentarium of immunosuppressive agents to ameliorate graft rejection, but find themselves limited by an inescapable therapeutic paradox. Insufficient immunosuppression results in graft loss due to rejection, while excess immunosuppression results in increased morbidity and mortality from opportunistic infections and malignancies. Indeed, graft rejection, infection, and malignancy are the three principal causes of mortality for the lung transplant recipient. One should also keep in mind that graft loss in a lung transplant recipient is usually a fatal event, since there is no practical means of long-term mechanical support, and since the prospects of re-transplantation are low, given the shortage of acceptable donor grafts. This chapter reviews the current state of immunosuppressive therapy for lung transplantation, and suggests alternative paradigms for the management of future lung transplant recipients.

Recent advances in the immunology of chronic rejection

Chronic allograft rejection is a slowly progressive, insidious process in which the host immune system continues to mount an immunological attack on a transplanted organ, ultimately resulting in the failure of the graft. To varying degrees, all solid organ grafts are at risk for chronic rejection and undergo a stereotypic process of injury and inflammation, eventually leading to parenchymal fibrosis. The clinical consequences of chronic rejection are particularly apparent in thoracic transplantation, where both patient and graft survival decline steadily over time and the opportunities for re-transplantation or long-term extracorporeal support are limited. A variety of antigen-dependent and antigen-independent factors are known to modulate the propensity for an organ to undergo chronic rejection. Recent clinical and laboratory research has suggested that distinct immunologic mechanisms may underlie the process of chronic rejection. Ultimately, strategies to induce long-term tolerance to alloantigens will be necessary to prevent chronic rejection and to abrogate the deleterious sequelae of chronic immunosuppression.

Complications (excluding hyperinflation) involving the native lung after single-lung transplantation: incidence, radiologic features, and clinical importance

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence, importance, and radiologic features of native lung complications after single-lung transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventeen (15%) of 111 single-lung transplant recipients developed native lung complications (excluding hyperinflation) 0-58 months (mean, 17 months) after transplantation. Complaints at presentation, culture or histopathologic results, diagnostic or therapeutic procedures, and outcome were recorded. Chest radiographs (n = 17) and computed tomographic (CT) scans (n = 8) obtained at time of diagnosis were reviewed. Serial radiographs were assessed for disease progression or improvement.

RESULTS

The most common complications were infection (n = 10), caused by bacteria (n = 4), fungi (n = 4), or mycobacteria (n = 2), typically manifested as lobar or segmental opacities on chest radiographs or CT scans. Lung cancer manifested as a solitary well-circumscribed nodule (n = 1), multiple nodules (n = 1), or a hilar mass (n = 1). Five (29%) of 17 patients died of native lung complications. Seven patients underwent mediastinoscopy (n = 3), lobectomy (n = 2), thoracoscopic wedge resection (n = 2), tube thoracostomy (n = 2), or pneumonectomy (n = 1) for diagnosis or treatment.

CONCLUSION

Native lung complications occurred in 17 (15%) single-lung transplant recipients, were most commonly due to infection or lung cancer, and caused serious morbidity or mortality in 12 (71%) of 17 patients affected.