Solute clearances with high dialysate flow rates and glucose absorption from the dialysate in continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis

Development and Use of an Ex-Vivo In-Vivo Correlation to Predict Antiepileptic Drug Clearance in Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

OBJECTIVES

Results from previous ex-vivo continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) models have successfully demonstrated similar extraction coefficients (EC) identified from in-vivo clinical trials. The objectives of this study are to develop an ex-vivo in-vivo correlation (EVIVC) model to predict drug clearance for commonly used antiepileptics and to evaluate similarity in drug extraction across different CRRT modalities to extrapolate dosing recommendations.

METHODS

Levetiracetam, lacosamide, and phenytoin CRRT clearance was evaluated using the Prismaflex CRRT system and M150 hemodiafilters using an albumin containing normal saline (ALB-NS) vehicle with 3 different albumin concentrations (2 g/dL, 3 g/dL, and 4 g/dL) and a human plasma vehicle at 3 different effluent flow rates (1 L/hr, 2 L/hr, and 3 L/hr). Blood and effluent/dialysate concentrations were collected after circuit priming. ECs were calculated for each drug, modality, vehicle, and experimental arm combination.

RESULTS

The calculated average EC for levetiracetam and lacosamide was approximated to the fraction unbound from plasma protein. Human plasma and ALB-NS vehicles demonstrated adequate prediction of in-vivo CRRT clearance. Geometric mean ratios indicated similarity in extraction coefficients when comparing between hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration modalities and between filtration and dialysis modalities at effluent flow rates ≤ 2L/hr. Evaluation of phenytoin provided inconsistent findings with regards to extraction coefficient similarity across different CRRT modalities.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that an ex-vivo study can be used as a surrogate to predict in-vivo levetiracetam and lacosamide clearance in patients receiving CRRT.

Changing the terminology from kidney replacement therapy to kidney support therapy

Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is a common supportive treatment for renal dysfunction, especially acute kidney injury. However, critically ill or immunosuppressed patients with renal dysfunction often have dysfunction in other organs as well. To improve patient outcomes, clinicians began to initiate kidney replacement therapy in situations where nonrenal conditions may lead to acute kidney injury, such as septic shock, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, veno-occlusive renal disease, cardiopulmonary bypass, chemotherapy, tumor lysis syndrome, hyperammonemia, and various others. In this review, we discuss the use of various modes of kidney replacement therapy in treating renal and nonrenal complications to illustrate why kidney support therapy is a more appropriate terminology than kidney replacement therapy.

Kidney Replacement Therapy in COVID-19 Induced Kidney Failure and Septic Shock: A Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy [PCRRT] Position on Emergency Preparedness With Resource Allocation

The recent worldwide pandemic of COVID-19 has had a detrimental worldwide impact on people of all ages. Although data from China and the United States indicate that pediatric cases often have a mild course and are less severe in comparison to adults, there have been several cases of kidney failure and multisystem inflammatory syndrome reported. As such, we believe that the world should be prepared if the severity of cases begins to further increase within the pediatric population. Therefore, we provide here a position paper centered on emergency preparation with resource allocation for critical COVID-19 cases within the pediatric population, specifically where renal conditions worsen due to the onset of AKI.

Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) in the Intensive Care Unit

This review is specifically designed to address the topic of CRRT based on the needs and interests of intensivists. Some of the materials, concepts, and formulas presented in this review have been drawn from a previous chapter authored by myself and intended for individuals whose primary interest is specifically dialysis[1]. Since this previous chapter was authored in 1994, similar material presented in this review has been updated in order to present the most current information.

CVVHD treatment with CARPEDIEM: small solute clearance at different blood and dialysate flows with three different surface area filter configurations

BACKGROUND

The CARdiorenal PEDIatric EMergency (CARPEDIEM) machine was originally designed to perform only continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) in neonatal and pediatric patients. In some cases, adequate convective clearance may not be reached because of a limited blood flow. In such conditions, the application of diffusive clearance [continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD)] would help optimize blood purification. In this study, the CARPEDIEM™ machine was modified to enable the circulation of dialysis through the filter allowing testing of the performance of CARPEDIEM™ machine in CVVHD.

METHODS

Three different polyethersulfone hemodialyzers (surface area = 0.1 m(2), 0.2 m(2), and 0.35 m(2), respectively) were tested in vitro with a scheduled combination of plasma flow rates (Qp = 10-20-30 ml/min) and dialysis fluid flow rate (Qd = 5-10-15 ml/min). Three sessions were performed in co-current and one in counter-current configuration (as control) for each filter size. Clearance was measured from the blood and dialysate sides and results with mass balance error greater than 5 % were discarded.

RESULTS

Urea and creatinine clearances for each plasma/dialysate combination are reported: clearance increase progressively for every filter proportionally to plasma flow rates. Similarly, clearances increase progressively with dialysate flow rates at a given plasma flow. The clearance curve tends to present a steep increase for small increases in plasma flow in the range below 10 ml/min, while the curve tends to plateau for values averaging 30 ml/min. As expected, the plateau is reached earlier with the smaller filter showing the effect of membrane surface-area limitation. At every plasma flow, the effect of dialysate flow increase is evident and well defined, showing that saturation of effluent was not achieved completely in any of the experimental conditions explored. No differences (p > 0.05 for all values) were obtained in experiments using whole blood instead of plasma or using co-current versus counter-current dialysate flow configuration.

CONCLUSIONS

Although plasma flow and filter surface give an important contribution to the level of clearance urea and creatinine, it appears evident that dialysate flow plays an essential role in the blood purification process, justifying the use of CVVHD versus CVVH in case of high dialysis dose requirement and/or limited blood flow rate.

Principles and operational parameters to optimize poison removal with extracorporeal treatments

A role for nephrologists in the management of a poisoned patient involves evaluating the indications for, and methods of, enhancing the elimination of a poison. Nephrologists are familiar with the various extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) used in the management of impaired kidney function, and their respective advantages and disadvantages. However, these same skills and knowledge may not always be considered, or applicable, when prescribing ECTR for the treatment of a poisoned patient. Maximizing solute elimination is a key aim of such treatments, perhaps more so than in the treatment of uremia, because ECTR has the potential to reverse clinical toxicity and shorten the duration of poisoning. This manuscript reviews the various principles that govern poison elimination by ECTR (diffusion, convection, adsorption, and centrifugation) and how components of the ECTR can be adjusted to maximize clearance. Data supporting these recommendations will be presented, whenever available.

Calorie intake and patient outcomes in severe acute kidney injury: findings from The Randomized Evaluation of Normal vs. Augmented Level of Replacement Therapy (RENAL) study trial

Introduction

Current practice in the delivery of caloric intake (DCI) in patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) is unknown. We aimed to describe calorie administration in patients enrolled in the Randomized Evaluation of Normal vs. Augmented Level of Replacement Therapy (RENAL) study and to assess the association between DCI and clinical outcomes.

Methods

We performed a secondary analysis in 1456 patients from the RENAL trial. We measured the dose and evolution of DCI during treatment and analyzed its association with major clinical outcomes using multivariable logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and time adjusted models.

Results

Overall, mean DCI during treatment in ICU was low at only 10.9 ± 9 Kcal/kg/day for non-survivors and 11 ± 9 Kcal/kg/day for survivors. Among patients with a lower DCI (below the median) 334 of 729 (45.8%) had died at 90-days after randomization compared with 316 of 727 (43.3%) patients with a higher DCI (above the median) (P = 0.34). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, mean DCI carried an odds ratio of 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91-1.00; P = 0.06) per 100 Kcal increase for 90-day mortality. DCI was not associated with significant differences in renal replacement (RRT) free days, mechanical ventilation free days, ICU free days and hospital free days. These findings remained essentially unaltered after time adjusted analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

Conclusions

In the RENAL study, mean DCI was low. Within the limits of such low caloric intake, greater DCI was not associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00221013

Comparing risk of new onset diabetes mellitus in chronic kidney disease patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis using propensity score matching

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients are at risk for developing new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) even after hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment. It is not clear if the incidence for NODM is different in CKD patients receiving HD and PD. This study compared the risk of NODM in PD patients and HD patients.

Methods

All HD and PD patients in Taiwan Renal Registry Database from 1997 to 2005 were included and all patients were followed to December 31, 2008. The risk of NODM was analyzed in PD patients and propensity score matched HD patients using logistic regression for early type NODM (< = 6 months after dialysis) and Cox regression for late type NODM (>6 months after dialysis).

Results

A total of 2548 PD patients and 10192 HD patients who had no diabetes on the initiation of dialysis were analyzed. The incidence for NODM was 3.7 per 100 patient/year for HD and 2.4 for PD patients. HD patients are more at risk for developing early type NODM (p<0.001) with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12–1.78)]. HD patients are more at risk for late type NODM (p<0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% CI: 1.77–2.29). Patient’s age was negatively associated with risk of early type of NODM (p<0.001) but positively associated with risk of late type NODM (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Chronic kidney disease patients receiving hemodialysis are more at risk for developing new-onset diabetes mellitus compared to those receiving peritoneal dialysis.

In vitro glucose kinetics during continuous renal replacement therapy: implications for caloric balance in critically ill patients

PURPOSE

To examine the impact of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) on glucose kinetics and therefore caloric balance.

METHODS

In vitro experiments were conducted to characterize glucose kinetics in a variety of CRRT modalities and prescriptions. Additional experiments evaluated the impact of citrate anticoagulation using anti-coagulant dextrose solution A (ACD-A) on CRRT glucose movement. A formula was developed to predict the glucose delivery to/from the patient per day of CRRT, and this data was extrapolated to determine the net caloric impact of CRRT.


RESULTS

A total of 104 experiments were conducted with an overall glucose extraction coefficient of 1.04 (95% CI 1.03-1.05). CRRT-related glucose removal was directly related to effluent (dialysate and/or hemofiltration) rate and pre-filter blood glucose concentration, and inversely related to dialysis solution glucose concentration. In all modalities tested, CRRT resulted in a net negative glucose balance, with estimated caloric losses ranging between 20 kcal and 550 kcal depending on the conditions tested. The addition of ACD-A resulted in net glucose delivery in some conditions and a positive caloric balance of up to 470 kcal per day.

CONCLUSIONS

CRRT can have a significant effect on glucose balance and result in either significant daily caloric gains or losses, and this effect can be predicted based on CRRT prescription and patient characteristics. Clinicians should be aware of this potential impact when prescribing nutritional therapy to patients undergoing CRRT, as an imbalance in caloric feeding can adversely affect outcomes in critically ill patients.

Operational characteristics of continuous renal replacement modalities used for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is required in a significant percentage of patients developing acute kidney injury (AKI) in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. One of the foremost objectives of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the removal of excess fluid and blood solutes that are retained as a consequence of decreased or absent glomerular filtration. Because prescription of CRRT requires goals to be set with regard to the rate and extent of both solute and fluid removal, a thorough understanding of the mechanisms by which solute and fluid removal occurs during CRRT is necessary. The following provides an overview of solute and water transfer during CRRT and this information is placed in the appropriate clinical context with a discussion of recent clinical trials assessing the relationship between CRRT dose and patient survival. Moreover, the differences between solute removal in CRRT and other dialysis modalities, especially sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) and extended daily dialysis (EDD), along with the potential clinical implications are discussed.

Bench-to-bedside review: metabolism and nutrition

Acute kidney injury (AKI) develops mostly in the context of critical illness and multiple organ failure, characterized by alterations in substrate use, insulin resistance, and hypercatabolism. Optimal nutritional support of intensive care unit patients remains a matter of debate, mainly because of a lack of adequately designed clinical trials. Most guidelines are based on expert opinion rather than on solid evidence and are not fundamentally different for critically ill patients with or without AKI. In patients with a functional gastrointestinal tract, enteral nutrition is preferred over parenteral nutrition. The optimal timing of parenteral nutrition in those patients who cannot be fed enterally remains controversial. All nutritional regimens should include tight glycemic control. The recommended energy intake is 20 to 30 kcal/kg per day with a protein intake of 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg per day. Higher protein intakes have been suggested in patients with AKI on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, the inadequate design of the trials does not allow firm conclusions. Nutritional support during CRRT should take into account the extracorporeal losses of glucose, amino acids, and micronutrients. Immunonutrients are the subject of intensive investigation but have not been evaluated specifically in patients with AKI. We suggest a protocolized nutritional strategy delivering enteral nutrition whenever possible and providing at least the daily requirements of trace elements and vitamins.

Metabolic disturbances following the use of inadequate solutions for hemofiltration in acute renal failure

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has become an important supportive therapy for critically ill children with acute renal failure. In Turkey, commercially available diafiltration and replacement fluids cannot be found on the market. Instead, peritoneal dialysis fluids for dialysis and normal saline as replacement fluid are used. The first objective of this study was to examine metabolic complications due to CRRT treatments. The second objective was to determine demographic characteristics and outcomes of patients who receive CRRT. We did a retrospective chart review of all pediatric patients treated with CRRT between February and December 2004. Thirteen patients received CRRT; seven survived (53.8%). All patients were treated with continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration. Median patient age was 71.8 +/- 78.8 (1.5-180) months. Hyperglycemia occurred in 76.9% (n=10), and metabolic acidosis occurred in 53.8% (n=7) of patients. Median age was younger (48.8 vs.106.2 months), median urea level (106.2 vs. 71 mg/dl) and percent fluid overload (FO) (17.2% vs. 7.6%, respectively) were higher, and CRRT initiation time was longer (8.6 vs 5.6 days) in nonsurvivors vs. survivors for all patients, although these were not statistically significant. CRRT was stopped in all survivors, and four nonsurvivors (67%) were on renal replacement therapy at the time of death. Hyperglycemia and metabolic acidosis were frequently seen in CRRT patients when commercially available diafiltration fluids were not available. Using peritoneal dialysis fluid as dialysate is not a preferable solution. Early initiation of CRRT offered survival benefits to critically ill pediatric patients. Mortality was associated with the primary disease diagnosis.

Use of continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in a case of severe phenobarbital poisoning

Conventional hemodialysis and hemoperfusion have been used for life-threatening phenobarbital poisoning. We report the successful use of continuous renal replacement therapy in a case of severe phenobarbital poisoning associated with severe coma and hypotension. Use of this modality led to clearance of phenobarbital with improvement in the clinical status of the patient.

Comparison of solute clearance in three modes of continuous renal replacement therapy

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clearances of low molecular weight molecules using three modalities of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) at the low blood flow rates typically used in pediatric patients.

DESIGN

A controlled, in vitro laboratory study.

SETTING

Research laboratory of a health sciences university.

SUBJECTS

AN69 dialysis hemofilter.

INTERVENTIONS

CRRT was performed using a 0.6 m(2) AN69 hemofilter. Human whole blood and plasma were combined to achieve a hematocrit of approximately 30%. Urea and creatinine were added to obtain concentrations of approximately 54 mmol/L of blood urea nitrogen and 1770 micromol/L of creatinine. Clearance data for urea and creatinine at a blood flow rate of 60 mL/min were generated using predilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH), postdilution CVVH, and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clearance of all three modalities was compared at a replacement solution (CVVH) or dialysate (CVVHD) flow rate of 16.7% of the blood flow rate. Both postdilution CVVH and CVVHD had a urea clearance of 11.3 mL/min, which was 15% greater than the 9.8 mL/min urea clearance of predilution CVVH (p <.005). Creatinine clearance with postdilution CVVH (10.7 mL/min) was 15% greater than the 9.0 mL/min clearance produced by predilution CVVH (p < 0.01). Predilution CVVH and CVVHD were compared at a flow rate of either replacement solution (CVVH) or dialysate (CVVHD) of 33% and 50% of the blood flow rate. Postdilution CVVH was not performed at high ultrafiltration rates due to the potential problem of hemoconcentration. CVVHD clearances of urea and creatinine were statistically superior to predilution CVVH at both flow rates.

CONCLUSIONS

CVVHD was superior to predilution CVVH for clearance of urea and creatinine. Postdilution CVVH and CVVHD gave nearly equivalent clearances. At the low blood flow rates used in pediatric patients, which raise concerns about high ultrafiltration during postdilution CVVH causing excessive hemoconcentration and filter clotting, CVVHD appears to be the optimal modality for maximizing clearance of small solutes during CRRT.

The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative--part IV: membranes for CRRT

The extracorporeal membrane used in a continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) for the treatment of a critically ill patient with acute renal failure (ARF) is vitally important for several reasons, including its influence on biocompatibility and filter performance. The clinical relevance of membrane-related biocompatibility markers traditionally used in chronic hemodialysis remains unclear in CRRT. Numerous approaches may be used to assess membrane and filter performance in CRRT, but no specific methodology is accepted widely at present. Although a potential benefit of certain membranes used for CRRT is adsorptive removal of inflammatory mediators, this issue has not been assessed carefully in well-designed clinical trials. These and other issues should be the subject of future clinical research efforts.

The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative--part VII: fluid composition and management in CRRT

Fluid composition and management are important parts of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Most commercially available CRRT solutions are able to reestablish electrolyte homeostasis provided some phosphate supplementation is given. Supraphysiologic glucose concentrations should be avoided. Predilution fluid replacement allows higher ultrafiltration rates and can be considered as an adjunct to the anticoagulation regimen. Lactate is an effective buffer in most CRRT patients. Bicarbonate is preferred in patients with lactic acidosis and/or liver failure. When citrate is used as anticoagulant, frequent monitoring of pH is required. The clinical consequences of CRRT-induced decreases of body temperature are not clear. Substitution fluid should be sterile, but the bacteriologic requirements for CRRT dialysate are less clear. There is no consensus on the optimal parameters to monitor fluid management. Integrated balancing systems have theoretical advantages over adaptive use of intravenous fluid pumps. Although there is evidence that volume overload is associated with adverse outcome, there is no evidence that fluid removal per se improves outcome in critically ill patients with or without acute renal failure.

Comparing continuous hemofiltration with hemodialysis in patients with severe acute renal failure

Continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or CVVH with additional diffusive dialysis (CVVH-D) has theoretical advantages in treating severe acute renal failure (ARF), but no prospective clinical trials or restrospective comparison studies have clearly shown its superiority over intermittent hemodialysis (HD). To evaluate this question, all 349 adult patients with ARF receiving renal replacement therapy (RRT) at our medical center during 1995 and 1996 were analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards methods. Initial univariate analysis showed the odds of death when receiving initial CVVH to be more than twice those when receiving initial HD (risk for death, 2.03; P < 0.01). Progressive exclusion of patients in whom the RRT modality might not be open to choice and the risk for death was very high (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg; total bilirubin level > 15 mg/dL; or total RRT < 48 hours) for total RRT left 227 patients in whom the risk for death was 1.09 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 1.80; P = 0.72) for initial CVVH, virtually equivalent to the risk for initial HD. Comorbid indicators significantly associated with death or failure to recover renal function included: older age; medical rather than surgical diagnosis; preexisting infection or trauma and liver disease as primary diagnoses; and abnormal bilirubin level or vital signs at initiation of RRT. These results show that the high crude mortality rate of patients undergoing CVVH was related to severity of illness and not the treatment choice itself. With the addition of more inclusive comorbidity data and a broader spectrum of interim outcomes, this type of analysis is a practical alternative to what would almost assuredly be a cumbersome and costly prospective, controlled trial comparing traditional HD with CVVH.

Urea kinetic modeling for CRRT

Urea kinetic modeling (UKM) for dialysis quantification and prescription, although widely used in chronic renal failure (CRF), has been largely absent in the acute setting. A quantitative approach to prescription of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRTs) for acute renal failure (ARF) based on UKM is presented. For patients with a relatively constant urea generation rate, G, who are receiving a fixed dose of CRRT, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) falls in an exponential fashion, approaching a plateau level after 3 to 4 days of continuous treatment. The CRRT clearance, K, necessary to achieve a desired plateau value of BUN, Cgoal, may be computed as G/Cgoal x K for all but predilutional CRRT modalities may be calculated as equal to the effluent (dialysate plus ultrafiltrate) flow rate from the filter. Urea mass balance equations are proposed for the determination of patient G value either during the pretreatment rise in BUN or during the decline in BUN with CRRT. In the absence of a reliable estimate of patient G, a reasonable CRRT starting prescription is to set the filter effluent rate in liters per hour (approximately K) to 1.2 times the patient's body weight in kilograms divided by the desired Cgoal in milligrams per deciliter. This relationship assumes moderate hypercatabolism (normalized protein catabolic rate = 2.0 g/kg/d) and patient urea distribution volume equal to 60% of body weight. For Cgoal = 60 mg/dL, this reduces to an easily remembered formula for K (in L/hr) of twice the patient's body weight divided by 100.

Lithium poisoning treated by high-performance continuous arteriovenous and venovenous hemodiafiltration

Intermittent hemodialysis is considered the modality of choice when enhanced lithium removal is indicated. However, postdialysis rebound in serum lithium concentration is frequently observed after the dialysis sessions and results from incomplete intracellular removal. Continuous renal replacement therapy could provide a more gradual and complete lithium removal since it is performed over longer time periods, thus avoiding rebound following therapy. Seven patients presenting with symptomatic lithium intoxication were treated by continuous renal replacement therapy (continuous arteriovenous and venovenous hemodiafiltration [CAVHDF and CVVHDF]). For CAVHDF, the dialysate flow rate was increased to 4 L/hr to optimize solute clearances. Five intoxicated patients (four acute and one chronic) were treated by high dialysate flow rate (HDFR) (4 L/hr) CAVHDF and two patients with chronic poisoning were treated by CVVHDF, one with a dialysate flow rate of 1 L/hr and one with a dialysate flow rate of 2 L/hr. Serum lithium concentrations for the four acute poisoning cases were 4.0, 4.6, 4.4, and 3.2 mEq/L, at initiation of HDFR CAVHDF, and decreased respectively to 1.2, 0.8, 1.2, and 1.1 mEq/L after 15, 19, 35, and 21 hours of treatment. No lithium rebound was observed over 24 to 36 hours following CAVHDF. For the three chronic intoxication cases, serum lithium concentrations dropped from 1.7, 2.2, and 3.8 mEq/L to 0.7, 0.17, and 0.4 mEq/L, respectively, after 18, 42, and 44 hours of HDFR CAVHDF or CVVHDF. The chronic case treated for only 18 hours presented a slight rebound in lithium level (0.3 mEq/L), whereas no significant rebound was observed for the two other cases treated for longer periods. Mean +/- SEM dialyser urea, lithium, and creatinine clearance during HDFR CAVHDF were 50.5 +/- 5.0, 41.4 +/- 4.6, and 37.6 +/- 3.7 mL/min, respectively (number of measurements = 41). Dialyser lithium clearance during CVVHDF was 48.4 +/- 1.4 mL/min (n = 10) and 61.9 +/- 2.3 mL/min (n = 7), with dialysate flow rates of 1 and 2 L/hr, respectively. Mean dialyzer lithium removal for the seven cases was 106.4 mEq, while mean renal lithium removal was 21.5 mEq during the same period. We conclude that HDFR CAVHDF and CVVHDF are effective alternatives to intermittent hemodialysis for treatment of lithium poisoning. They provide excellent lithium clearances (60 to 85 L/d); in addition, because of their continuous nature, they prevent posttherapy lithium rebound by allowing a more gradual and complete removal from intracellular compartments, and they may be particularly useful in chronic poisoning in which intracellular lithium accumulation is more extensive.

Bicarbonate dialysate for continuous renal replacement therapy in intensive care unit patients with acute renal failure

Lactate-buffered peritoneal solution traditionally has been used as dialysate for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in the United States because no bicarbonate solution is commercially available. Since 1994, the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Dialysis Unit has prepared a bicarbonate solution (sodium 144 +/- 3 mEq/L, HCO3 37 +/- 2 mEq/L, potassium 3 or 4 mEq/L, calcium 3.0 +/- 0.3 mEq/L, and magnesium 1.4 +/- 0.3 mg/dL) replicating the dialysate for chronic intermittent hemodialysis. No solute precipitation, as calcium or magnesium salts, were observed, and several cultures of the solution, performed at various time periods, remained negative. Fifty critically ill acute renal failure patients have been treated with bicarbonate-CRRT. All patients were in multiple organ failure and required mechanical ventilation; 37 were receiving vasopressors. Forty-four continuous venovenous hemodialysis sessions and eight continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis sessions were performed with a mean duration of 7.8 +/- 6.1 days. The mean inflow dialysate rate was 1,249 +/- 225 mL/hr and the mean outflow rate (dialysate plus ultrafiltration) was 1,399 +/- 237 mL/hr; the inflow rate was constantly kept lower or equal to the outflow rate to avoid an enhanced potential for backfiltration. No related fever spikes or sepsis episodes were noted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

What dialysis dose should be provided in acute renal failure? A review

Increased dialysis dose has been shown to improve morbidity and survival in chronic hemodialysis patients. Despite improvement in care and technological aspects of renal replacement therapy, mortality rates of acute renal failure (ARF) have remained essentially unchanged for over two decades, exceeding 50% in most studies. The occurrence of ARF in older patients with more complicated medical and surgical conditions has contributed to this lack of outcome amelioration, and death of ARF patients is now more frequently caused by underlying disease than ARF itself. A recent prospective survey at this institution found a mortality rate of 79.1% among a total of 363 ARF medical and surgical intensive care unit patients, with a mean age near 60 years and a mean admission APACHE II score of over 20, who were treated by intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Nonsurvivors had a mean of over four failed systems, in addition to the renal failure, compared with survivors who had less than four. The standards for dialysis adequacy in ARF are not currently defined. Increased catabolism seen in ARF patients in the intensive care unit may justify large dialysis dose delivery. An apparent influence of delivered dialysis dose on the outcome of ARF intensive care unit patients has been recently observed at our institution. Compared with nonsurvivors, survivors had received significantly higher dialysis dose, as assessed by Kt/V and urea reduction ratio. In ARF patients, the discrepancy between delivered versus prescribed dialysis dose may be particularly important and contributed to by the following: reduced blood flow rate and dialysis time consequent to patient intolerance; lower dialyzer in vivo clearances, particularly in heparin-free dialysis; blood recirculation when using temporary vascular access; and postdialysis urea rebound. Prolonging the course of renal failure is one of the risks attributed to frequent dialysis; hypotension and ultrafiltration combined with a deficient renal autoregulation can result in further renal damage. The detrimental effects of bioincompatible membranes have been demonstrated with an induced-delay of renal function recovery. A recent study has reported benefits of biocompatible membranes in terms of potential for renal recovery and maintenance of urine output during dialytic support when compared with bioincompatible membranes. CRRT offers many advantages over intermittent hemodialysis for ARF intensive care unit patients: better hemodynamic tolerance, avoidance of solute rebound, and removal of serum sepsis mediators. However, CRRT have not yet been firmly shown to improve survival rates. Recently, urea kinetics have been used to estimate dialysis dose provided by CRRT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Continuous renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients: an update

Despite continuous progress in intensive care during the last decades, the outcome of critically ill patients in whom acute renal failure (ARF) develops is still poor. This outcome may be explained partially by the frequent occurrence of ARF as part of multiple organ systems failure (MOSF). In this complex and unstable patient population, the provision of adequate renal support with either intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis may pose major problems. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is now increasingly accepted as the preferred treatment modality in the management of ARF in these patients. The technique offers adequate control of biochemistry and fluid balance in hemodynamically unstable patients, thereby enabling aggressive nutritional and inotropic support without the risk of exacerbating azotemia or fluid overload. In addition, experimental and clinical data suggest that CRRT may have a beneficial influence on hemodynamics and gas exchange in patients with septic shock and (nonrenal) MOSF, independent of an impact on fluid balance. We review both technical and clinical aspects of various continuous therapies, including their impact on serum drug levels and nutrient balance. In addition, an attempt is made to clarify the possible beneficial role of CRRT in reducing patient morbidity and mortality in the ICU.

A review of continuous renal replacement therapy

Patients in the Intensive Care Unit commonly develop acute renal failure (ARF). The kidneys are rarely the only organs failing in these patients. Frequently ARF is part of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The choice of dialytic therapy should consider, not only the efficacy of the therapy, but also the undesirable effects such therapy may have on the other failing organs. Intermittent Haemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis were the conventional forms of dialysis available. Both are associated with complications which may make them unsuitable for use in the haemodynamically unstable, hypercatabolic patients, seen in the Intensive Care setting. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) has been introduced in many Intensive Care Units to provide a more stable, flexible form of dialysis. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the various forms of CRRT and to discuss the advantages of this form of therapy.

High dialysate flow rate continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis: a new approach for the treatment of acute renal failure and tumor lysis syndrome

A continuous dialysis technique such as continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis (CAVHD) could be an interesting alternative to frequent intermittent hemodialysis to treat acute renal failure (ARF) secondary to tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). However, because of massive release of intracellular solutes in TLS, CAVHD clearances need to be increased to treat this syndrome. Continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis using a high dialysate flow rate at 4 L/hr was assessed in TLS and ARF associated with severe hyperphosphatemia. A 0.6-m2 hollow-fiber polyacrylonitrile dialyzer (Multiflow 60; Hospal, St-Léonard, Québec, Canada) was used. Blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels decreased, respectively, from 102.5 to 27.2 mg/dL and from 3.1 to 1.8 mg/dL during the 36 hours of treatment. Serum urate concentration was normal at the beginning of treatment (4.5 mg/dL) and decreased to 2.1 mg/dL by the end of CAVHD. Serum phosphorus decreased from 16.7 to 4.4 mg/dL after the 36 hours of treatment. The calcium x phosphorus product decreased from 111.1 to 42.1 by 28 hours and remained under 50 thereafter. Serum potassium was easily controlled with the addition of 2.5 mEq/L of KCl in dialysate and replacement solutions. No rebound increases in phosphorus or potassium were noted after cessation of therapy. Continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis clearances of urea, creatinine, phosphorus, and urate were measured at 2-hour intervals for the first 24 hours and at 4-hour intervals for the remaining 12 hours. They were 53.0 +/- 2.3 mL/min, 43.7 +/- 2.2 mL/min, 40.4 +/- 1.9 mL/min, and 39.3 +/- 1.9 mL/min (n = 15), respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nutrition Support of the Diabetic Patient

Diabetes, as the component of the past medical history of individuals requiring nutrition support, poses specific problems to the clinician managing the patient. Besides an exaggerated glucose response to nutritional intervention, diabetics may have conditions or treatments that increase the morbidity and mortality associated with nutrition support therapy. As such, nutritional intervention should only be considered in patients for whom therapy is appropriately indicated. Then, the caloric dose, rate, and route of enteral and parenteral nutrition needs to be determined precisely. Glucose homeostasis along with etiologies and clinical manifestations of hyper- and hypoglycemia are to be clearly understood before initiating any nutritional support therapy in the diabetic. Without such, confusion may arise in determining the etiology of glucose problems occurring in patients from all the possible variables that influence the final serum glucose concentration in the patient. A cautious approach to initiating nutrition support is recommended, starting with low flow rates (10 to 20 mL/h for enteral nutrition and 40 mL/h for parenteral nutrition) and gradual incremental increases (in the 10- to 20-mL/h/d range) based on careful observation of blood glucose concentrations. A goal for tolerance should be established for each patient at the beginning of therapy, specifically, acceptable peak and trough glucose concentrations. This provides an extremely good template for adjusting the route (subcutaneous or intravenous) or type (intermittent vs continuous infusion) of insulin therapy. When the nutrient dose is stabilized at the optimal rate and insulin requires no further adjustment, transition of the patient to more appropriate, chronic therapy such as long-acting insulin or oral hypoglycemics is desired. The management of the diabetic patient on nutrition support is a challenge for even the most experienced individual. The potential for complications is abundant. A cautious, conservative approach is recommended with particular attention to minimizing the sources of both glucose and insulin administration.