Prevalence and long-term outcome of glomerulonephritis in renal allografts

Probability, predictors, and prognosis of posttransplantation glomerulonephritis

Glomerulonephritis (GN) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease among recipients of renal transplants. Because modern immunosuppressive regimens have reduced the incidence of rejection-related graft loss, the probability and clinical significance of posttransplantation GN (PTGN) requires reevaluation. In this Canadian epidemiologic study, we monitored 2026 sequential renal transplant recipients whose original renal disease resulted from biopsy-proven GN (36%), from presumed GN (7.8%), or from disorders other than GN (56%) for 15 yr without loss to follow-up. Kaplan-Meier estimates of PTGN in the whole population were 5.5% at 5 yr, 10.1% at 10 yr, and 15.7% at 15 yr. PTGN was diagnosed in 24.3% of patients whose original renal disease resulted from biopsy-proven GN, compared with 11.8% of those with presumed GN and 10.5% of those with disorders other than GN. Biopsy-proven GN in the native kidney, male gender, younger age, and nonwhite ethnicity predicted PTGN. Current immunosuppressive regimens did not associate with a reduced frequency of PTGN. Patients who developed PTGN had significantly reduced graft survival (10.2 versus 69.7%; P < 0.0001). In summary, in the Canadian population, PTGN is a common and serious complication that causes accelerated graft failure, despite the use of modern immunosuppressive regimens.

Prognostic factors associated with poor graft outcomes in renal recipients with post-transplant glomerulonephritis

BACKGROUND

Little data are available concerning post-transplantation glomerulonephritis (PTx-GN) and its prognostic factors associated with graft outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated patients with de novo and recurrent PTx-GN to identify the factors associated with their negative impact on graft and patient outcomes. PTx-GN was diagnosed in 55 patients, wherein 17 (31%) had recurrent glomerulonephritis (GN) and 16 (29%) had de novo.

RESULTS

Our enrolled population consisted of 34 +/- 13.7-yr-old male patients (72%), on hemodialysis for a median of 18 months (0-204) and mainly grafted from living donors (76%). The median onset time of proteinuria and hematuria was 50 d (10-2160) and 30 d (4-1170), respectively. One-yr graft survival rates after PTx-GN diagnosis was 64%. The most frequent de novo GN was membranous GN (26%), while focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was the most frequent recurrent GN (41%), with a very early onset (median of three months). One-yr graft survival was better in the recurrent disease than in the de novo patients, 76% vs. 55% (p = 0.24). The best predictor factors that correlated with graft survival were: proteinuria <3.5 g [relative risk (RR) = 0.24, p = 0.017], serum creatinine below 2.0 mg/dL (RR = 0.06, p = 0.016) at the time of biopsy and the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) (RR = 0.12, p = 0.005). The use of ACEI markedly improved one-yr graft survival rates (92% vs. 47%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PTx-GN has a strong negative impact on kidney graft survival. De novo GN appears to have a poorer prognosis than the recurrent type. Patients who used ACEI showed a better survival rate in the follow-up.

Initial response to immunosuppressive and renoprotective treatment in posttransplant glomerulonephritis

The current studies on posttransplant glomerulonephritis (PTxGN) do not establish when, how, or how long we must treat these patients. This study sought to compare the initial response to immunosuppressive treatment and renoprotection in PTxGN.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was performed in 23 patients with a histological diagnosis of PTxGN.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 12 months (3-18); 91% received immunosuppressants, and 56.5% just renoprotective drugs. The best results (reduction of serum creatinine [SCr] and proteinuria) with immunosuppression were observed in patients with recurrent membranous PTxGN using the scheme of Ponticelli (IV + PO corticosteroid [CS] + PO cyclophosphamide [CPP]). A similar response was also seen in subjects with recurrent or de novo focal glomerulosclerosis treated with PO CS or CPP, except when the initial SCr > 2.5 mg/dL. In de novo IgA nephropathy, reduction of proteinuria occurred with use of PO CS, with or without CPP, but without improvement in SCr. Patients with recurrent or de novo crescentic PTxGN used renoprotective drugs and always immunosuppressants. In this group, good results were seen with IV + PO CS, with or without CPP, when there was less than 50% of glomeruli with crescents, or more than 50% with crescents but an initial SCr < 2.5 mg/dL.

CONCLUSION

Immunosuppression seemed to give a better initial response than renoprotection in cases of membranous, IgA, and focal segmental glomulerulosclerosis PTxGN. Patients with an initial SCr > or = 2.5 mg/dL displayed worse outcomes.

Impact of Therapeutic Changes on Renal Graft Survival With Posttransplant Glomerulonephritis

INTRODUCTION

Posttransplant glomerulonephritis (GN) is the third cause of graft loss after 1 year of transplant follow-up; few approaches have been efficient in reversing this outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the modification of the immunosuppressive therapy for treating posttransplant GN had an impact on allograft survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients who underwent renal transplantation and developed posttransplant GN were divided into two groups: group 1, 22 patients with modified immunosuppressive treatment (72.3%, pulse of methylprednisolone; 13.6%, high-dose oral corticosteroid), and group 2, where it was maintained. Additionally, the impact of the concomitant use of drugs that promote the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade (RAASB) was analyzed in terms of graft survival.

RESULTS

We established the diagnosis of GN at 17.9 months (range, 0.57 to 153.4) after transplantation, when serum creatinine (Cr) was 2.2 mg/dL (range, 0.8 to 12.5) and proteinuria 3.2 g/L (range, 0.2 to 24.2). Graft survivals at 1 and 3 years after diagnosis were 69.2% and 52.9%, respectively. The patients of group 1 showed a lower prevalence of graft loss (27.2% versus 48.1%, P = .40) and better survival at the end of 1 year (73.2% versus 60.4%) and 3 years (62.5% versus 38.0%, P = .26), but the differences were not significant. RAASB showed a positive impact on survival at the end of 3 years in both groups: for group 1, 83.8% with RAASB, 41.4% without RAASB; and for group 2, 75% with RAASB and 14.8% without RAASB (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Although treatment of posttransplant GN with modification of immunosuppression seemed to improve graft survival in the first 3 years after diagnosis, RAASB improved this effect.

Acute post-bacterial glomerulonephritis in renal transplant patients: description of three cases and review of the literature

Only a few cases of acute post-infectious glomerulonephritis have been described in renal transplant patients. We report here three cases of acute post-bacterial glomerulonephritis in renal transplants. In contrast to the classic cases of post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis the type of infection was heterogeneous: respectively, Escherichia coli bacteremia, a skin abscess, and cholangitis. The clinical presentation was characterized by a deterioration of graft function in two of our three patients. Acute renal dysfunction recovered in both patients, but in the long term the outcome was severe; two of the three patients lost their graft function. It is difficult to ascertain whether progression was due to chronic allograft nephropathy, to glomerulonephritis, or both. It may be concluded that acute post-infectious glomerulonephritis is a possible, although rare, complication in renal transplant recipients. It has an unusual presentation and may have a poor outcome in the long term. The role of therapy, if any, is still undefined.

Recurrent and de novo glomerular disease after renal transplantation: a report from Renal Allograft Disease Registry (RADR)

INTRODUCTION

Short-term and long-term results of renal transplantation have improved over the past 15 years. However, there has been no change in the prevalence of recurrent and de novo diseases. A retrospective study was initiated through the Renal Allograft Disease Registry, to evaluate the prevalence and impact of recurrent and de novo diseases after transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 1987 to December 1996, a total of 4913 renal transplants were performed on adults at the Medical College of Wisconsin, University of Cincinnati, University of California at San Francisco, University of Louisville, University of Washington, Seattle, and Washington University School of Medicine. The patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. A total of 167 (3.4%) cases of recurrent and de novo disease were diagnosed by renal biopsy. These patients were compared with other patients who did not have recurrent and de novo disease (n=4746). There were more men (67.7% vs. 59.8%, P<0.035) and a higher number of re-transplants (17% vs. 11.5%, P<0.005) in the recurrent and de novo disease group. There was no difference in the rate of recurrent and de novo disease according to the transplant type (living related donor vs. cadaver, P=NS). Other demographic findings were not significantly different. Common forms of glomerulonephritis seen were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), 57; immunoglobulin A nephritis, 22; membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (GN), 18; and membranous nephropathy, 16. Other diagnoses include: diabetic nephropathy, 19; immune complex GN, 12; crescentic GN (vasculitis), 6; hemolytic uremic syndrome-thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (HUS/TTP), 8; systemic lupus erythematosus, 3; Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, 2; oxalosis, 2; and miscellaneous, 2. The diagnosis of recurrent and de novo disease was made after a mean period of 678 days after the transplant. During the follow-up period, there were significantly more graft failures in the recurrent disease group, 55% vs. 25%, P<0.001. The actuarial 1-, 2-, 3-, 4, and 5-year kidney survival rates for patients with recurrent and de novo disease was 86.5%, 78.5%, 65%, 47.7%, and 39.8%. The corresponding survival rates for patients without recurrent and de novo disease were 85.2%, 81.2%, 76.5%, 72%, and 67.6%, respectively (Log-rank test, P<0.0001). The median kidney survival rate for patients with and without recurrent and de novo disease was 1360 vs. 3382 days (P<0.0001). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model for graft failure was performed to identify various risk factors. Cadaveric transplants, prolonged cold ischemia time, elevated panel reactive antibody, and recurrent disease were identified as risk factors for allograft failure. The relative risk (95% confidence interval) for graft failure because of recurrent and de novo disease was 1.9 (1.57-2.40), P<0.0001. The relative risk for graft failure because of posttransplant FSGS was 2.25 (1.6-3.1), P<0.0001, for membranoprolifera. tive glomerulonephritis was 2.37 (1.3-4.2), P<0.003, and for HUS/TTP was 5.36 (2.2-12.9), P<0.0002. There was higher graft failure (64.9%) and shorter half-life (1244 days) in patients with recurrent FSGS.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, recurrent and de novo disease are associated with poorer long-term survival, and the relative risk of allograft loss is double. Significant impact on graft survival was seen with recurrent and de novo FSGS, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and HUS/TTP.

Systemic vasculitis in a kidney transplant population

BACKGROUND

Systemic vasculitis as original disease might adversely influence the result of kidney transplantation.

METHODS

The clinical course after 32 transplantations to 26 patients with microscopic polyangiitis, Wegener's granulomatosis, Henoch-Schonlein purpura, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome, or Goodpasture's disease was evaluated. The median follow-up time was 82 months (range, 4-132 months). Frozen sera from 25 transplantations were analyzed for Goodpasture antibodies, myeloperoxidase antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), and proteinase 3 ANCA.

RESULTS

Survival of patients and grafts did not differ between patients and matched controls. Recurrent vasculitis occurred with seven grafts (four patients with microscopic polyangiitis or Wegener's granulomatosis, two patients with Henoch-Schonlein purpura, and one patient thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura). New-onset hematuria was the initial renal symptom in five patients. Treatment with corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and/or plasma exchange was most often effective, but two grafts were lost. Proteinase 3 ANCA titers were increased to 12-738 U/ml before seven transplants. The patient with the lowest titer lost his graft due to recurrence, two other patients had reversible recurrence after 1 year and 5 years, two patients lost their grafts due to unknown/unrelated causes, and two patients' grafts remain without recurrence. Myeloperoxidase ANCA were increased to 22-39 U/ml before two transplants, which have been uneventful for 4 years.

CONCLUSIONS

An awareness of the small but perpetual risk of recurrence facilitates early treatment that may save the transplant. Testing for hematuria and early transplant biopsies, and possibly monitoring of ANCA titers, are essential, but pretransplant ANCA titers have no predictive value in asymptomatic patients. Results of kidney transplantation in patients with vasculitis are as good as in other patients.

Recurrence of immunoglobulin A nephropathy after renal transplantation in the cyclosporine era

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) frequently recurs in patients after renal transplantation (RT) on a conventional regimen of immunosuppressive therapy, but little is known about the influence of cyclosporine (Cs) on such a recurrence. We studied 84 patients retrospectively who underwent RT for renal failure attributable to IgAN (n = 71) or Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephropathy (HSPN) (n = 13) in two transplantation units, between January 1985 and June 1991 and were treated with Cs. Four patients died 3 months to 8 years after RT. Graft survival was 88% at 1 year, 75.2% at 5 years, and 63% at 8 years. Fifty patients underwent at least one graft biopsy, but studies with immunofluorescence were performed on only 28 (23 IgAN and 5 HSPN). After a mean follow-up of 68.1 +/- 37.2 months, mesangial IgA deposits recurred in 13 of the 28 patients (12 IgAN and 1 HSP) (prevalence, 46.4%). Among the 13 patients with recurrence of IgA deposits, all but 4 had urinary abnormalities. Light microscopy showed mesangial deposits and focal and segmental glomerular changes in 9 cases. Four patients lost their graft function 69 to 119 months after RT, and 2 had severe graft dysfunction. The rates of graft failure and mean serum creatinine at 1, 5, and 8 years were similar in the 13 patients with recurrence and the 15 patients without proven recurrence. In conclusion, Cs did not reduce the incidence or severity of IgAN recurrence. The latter was the cause of graft loss or dysfunction in 46.1 % of the patients with recurrent IgA deposits. Recurrent glomerulonephritis did not influence the 8-year graft survival in patients with IgAN or HSPN, but it may be an important cause of graft loss as evidenced by more extended follow-up.

Original renal disease in a kidney-transplant population

Classification of the underlying renal disorder in kidney transplant patients involves some uncertainties. To allow evaluation of the risk of recurrence of renal disease in the transplanted kidney and other characteristics and risks inherent to the specific renal disorder we have investigated the basis for and reevaluated the diagnosis of 1000 consecutive patients who received transplants in Göteborg 1985-1993. In the original registry, 36% of patients had been given the diagnosis chronic glomerulonephritis but the diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy in only half of them, 18% of the total population. Systemic vasculitides and hereditary disorders other than adult polycystic kidney disease which constituted 3% and 6%, respectively, had frequently been overlooked. The term chronic pyelonephritis (15%) covered a variety of conditions including toxic tubulointerstitial disease, but was dominated by those caused by congenital urinary tract formations. Diabetic nephropathy (21%) was the consequence of Type 1 diabetes in 18% and Type 2 or other forms of diabetes in 3%. The proportion of patients with unknown cause of renal failure was 20%. The registry allows identification of small, distinct entities, which may be characterised as regards prerequisites for and consequences of kidney transplantation.

Acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis in a renal allograft

We report a 12-year-old male with acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (APSGN) occurring 1 year after a cadaveric renal transplant. Although recurrent and de novo renal transplant glomerulonephritides have been well described in large series of adult and pediatric renal transplant recipients, post-infectious glomerulonephritis has been rarely reported, and APSGN has never been reported in either adult or pediatric transplant series. We speculate on the reasons for the lack of occurrence of APSGN in renal transplant recipients.

Living-related donor transplants should be performed with caution in patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis

The success rates of living-related donor (LRD) transplants are clearly superior to those obtained with cadaver donors. However, caution should be exercised when considering LRD transplantation for a condition which has an increased chance of recurring after transplantation and causing ultimate graft failure. The recurrence rate of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in the allograft is 20%-40%, with graft failure resulting in 40%-50% of these cases. However, these figures may be an underestimation of the true rate of recurrence of FSGS. Once a first transplant fails due to recurrent disease, the risk of recurrence in the second transplant approaches 80%. Subgroups of patients at high risk for recurrence have been identified. In patients not at high risk for recurrent FSGS, the use of a LRD should be considered, provided that the donor and recipient and their families have been informed that the disease may recur and lead to graft failure. In patients at high risk for recurrence, a LRD transplant should be avoided. Hopefully, future development of a simple and reliable test to predict the likelihood of recurrence will enable us to counsel and advise our patients with FSGS about the wisdom or dangers of proceeding with a LRD transplant.