Removal of aluminum during hemodialysis: effect of different dialyzer membranes

Removal of aluminoxamine and ferrioxamine by charcoal hemoperfusion and hemodialysis

We studied the removal of aluminoxamine (AlO) and ferrioxamine (FO) by (i) hemoperfusion/hemodialysis using an AluKart in combination with either a Cuprophan F-120 or a Hemophan FH-160 membrane, or (ii) hemodialysis with a high-flux F-60 polysulfone membrane. The same six dialysis patients underwent in a random order dialysis by the three set-ups after i.v. infusion of 30 mg/kg of desferrioxamine (DFO) during the last half an hour of the preceding dialysis session. The mean +/- SD plasma AlO and FO clearances of the AluKart combined with either a F-120 or FH-160 membrane were 194.3 +/- 25.8 ml/min (AlO) and 164.2 +/- 41.3 ml (FO) at the start of dialysis declining to respectively 76.6 +/- 27.3 and 68.5 +/- 42.6 ml/min at the end of dialysis. With a high-flux dialysis membrane the intra-dialytic plasma clearance remained constant at 81.5 +/- 6.8 ml/min for AlO and 60.0 +/- 2.8 ml/min for FO. In the presence of an AluKart combined with a FH-160 up to 84 +/- 27% and 84 +/- 19% of the available AlO and FO could be removed during a four-hour hemoperfusion/hemodialysis session. During the first hour of dialysis, respectively 59 and 58% of the total amount of AlO and FO extracted by the AluKart was removed compared to only 9 and 16% during the last hour.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Concomitant iron and aluminum mass transfer following deferoxamine infusion during hemofiltration

Variable tissue overloading can alter the removal rate of iron and aluminum from uremics. Owing to its higher affinity to deferoxamine (DFO) and higher plasma concentrations, Fe could impair Al removal in cases of simultaneous body burden. Fe and Al plasma kinetics and mass transfer were therefore studied in 12 uremic patients with different Fe and Al status: six with normal ferritin levels (less than 400 micrograms/L [ng/mL]), and Al 1.4 to 4.7 mumol/L (40 to 131 micrograms/L) (group A); six with increased ferritin (greater than 2,000 micrograms/L), and Al 1.7 to 17 mumol/L (47 to 476 micrograms/L) (group B). DFO (40 and 80 mg/kg in a random sequence) was administered once a week during the first hour of the first hemofiltration (HF). The results show that in both groups and with both DFO doses, maximum Fe and Al mass transfer was achieved in the first and second HF, respectively. The 80-mg/kg dose of DFO significantly raised Al mass transfer in both groups, whereas Fe mass transfer was only slightly affected. Even though plasma Fe levels were almost always higher than Al, Al mass transfer eventually exceeded that of Fe, in both Fe-normal and Fe-overload patients. The bias towards Al in mass transfer was enhanced in both groups in the second HF, and at the higher DFO doses. Thus, DFO once a week reduced Fe loss to less than 30 mumol/wk in patients with normal ferritin levels. In both Fe and Al overloaded patients, Al can be removed, and Al mass transfer may often exceed Fe mass transfer, depending on the degree of tissue burden, the time from DFO infusion, and the DFO dose.

Recombinant human erythropoietin and phlebotomy in the treatment of iron overload in chronic hemodialysis patients

Five long-term hemodialysis patients with clinical iron overload were treated with 300 U/kg of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) intravenously (IV) after each hemodialysis. The patients were phlebotomized after each hemodialysis at any time the predialysis hematocrit was 35% or greater. Over a period of 1 year, the average phlebotomy rate varied from 0.5 to 1.1 U/wk with a mean phlebotomy rate of 45.8 +/- 5.6 U/yr (range, 27 to 57 U). The mean serum ferritin decreased from 8,412 +/- 1,599 micrograms/L (ng/mL) to 3,007 +/- 1,129 micrograms/L (ng/mL), and the mean iron removal over this period was 9.5 g. Liver iron deposition, as measured by density on computed tomographic (CT) scan, improved, while skin color lightened significantly. Patients tolerated phlebotomy with no major symptoms or complications and exhibited no change in the hemogram or serum chemistries. In patients with severe iron overload, changes in serum ferritin with erythropoietin treatment alone may not reflect true change in iron burden. Use of high-dose erythropoietin and phlebotomy is an effective and safe (at least for 1 year) method of reducing iron overload in long-term hemodialysis patients.

Kinetics and efficacy of deferoxamine in iron-overloaded hemodialysis patients

We evaluated the kinetics and efficacy of deferoxamine (DFO) therapy in iron-overloaded hemodialysis patients. Concentrations of DFO and its chelated product, feroxamine (Fx), were assessed following single-dose DFO administration in twelve patients, and during chronic therapy over one year's time in eight, similarly iron-overloaded dialysis patients. A functional assay which relies on measurements of iron and iron binding capacity for the determination of Fx and DFO, respectively, was corroborated with liquid chromatographic techniques. Half-life measurements were also corroborated with tracer doses of 14C-DFO and 59Fe-feroxamine. Intradialytic DFO half-life (2.3 +/- 1.1 h) was considerably less than interdialytic half-life (26 +/- 1 hr). Unbound DFO was found to persist throughout the interdialytic period. Calculation of the percent saturation of the DFO dose indicated that only 30% of a given dose is chelated. The amount of iron removed dialytically was approximately 13.1 +/- 2.7 mg per dialysis session. Chronic DFO administration was also shown to enhance gastrointestinal iron excretion threefold. However, ferritin levels decreased by only 25% after one year of thrice-weekly DFO therapy. We conclude that DFO therapy for iron-overloaded hemodialysis patients is optimized by its administration interdialytically, and results in slow removal of iron, via both dialytic and gastrointestinal routes.

Accelerated removal of deferoxamine mesylate-chelated aluminum by charcoal hemoperfusion in hemodialysis patients

Although deferoxamine mesylate (DFO) is effective in removing aluminum (Al) in hemodialysis patients, treatment with this drug is associated with a number of adverse effects. In order to limit the exposure of patients to DFO-Al complexes, the efficacy of colloidin-coated microencapsulated charcoal cartridges added in series to conventional dialyzers was investigated. The clearances of Al by the sorbent system were initially 116 +/- 4.7 mL/min, but decreased to 42.5 +/- 6.6 mL/min after 120 minutes of treatment. Thereafter, the Al clearances remained constant. In contrast, the Al clearances of the dialyzer were 29.5 +/- 1.8 mL/min initially and did not change during the treatment period. Both the percent and absolute decrease in Al levels after four hours of dialysis were greater with the dialyzers plus carbon cartridges than with the dialyzers alone. This resulted in an increase in the minimum net Al removal from 1,862 +/- 174 micrograms/treatment to 3,007 +/- 43 micrograms/treatment (P less than 0.05). Treatment with sorbent hemoperfusion should be considered in selected hemodialysis patients being treated with DFO for Al overload.

Recent developments in aluminum toxicology

Aluminum is now recognised as an important toxin causing considerable morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with chronic renal failure. Diseases that have been associated with aluminium include dialysis dementia, renal osteodystrophy and Alzheimer's disease. Aluminum also has an effect on red blood cells, parathyroid glands and chromosomes. Accumulation of aluminium in the body tends to occur when the gastrointestinal barrier is circumvented. This has been identified as a problem during dialysis or intravenous fluid administration. Renal functional impairment results in decreased aluminum excretion and promotes accumulation of the element in the body. Many sources have been shown to be contaminated with aluminium. These include the water used for dialysis; medicines containing aluminium, such as aluminium-containing phosphate binding gels; total parenteral nutrition solutions; processed human serum albumin; intravenous fluids in infants; and other environmental and industrial sources. The management of aluminium toxicity involves the identification of these contaminated sources and subsequent removal of the element. This includes regular monitoring of water used in dialysis. The use of aluminium-containing phosphate binding gels in patients with compromised renal function should be reviewed and alternatives sought. The development of effective aluminium-free phosphate binders is desirable. Once a patient has aluminium toxicity, desferrioxamine (deferoxamine) has been shown to be an effective agent in its chelation and removal.

Deferoxamine and coated charcoal hemoperfusion to remove aluminum in dialysis patients

We studied the in vitro and in vivo characteristics of aluminum (Al) removal by coated charcoal hemoperfusion (HP) in combination with intravenous deferoxamine (DFO). DFO enhanced the clearance of Al by HP in vitro after 180 minutes of perfusion with a solution containing 403.3 +/- 14.0 ng/ml of Al at 150 ml/min. The Al clearance was 139 +/- 1.0 ml/min with DFO and 49 +/- 10.0 ml/min (P less than 0.001) without DFO. Addition of DFO enhanced in vitro Al removal from 5.5 +/- 0.9 mg to 10.0 +/- 1.2 mg (P less than 0.05). During our in vivo studies, an HP device was in series in the dialysis circuit after a Cuprophan hemodialyzer. Eight patients with Al toxicity were studied on twelve occasions. Patients received DFO (40 mg/kg) 40 hours before the study. The total Al clearance with the combined hemodialysis (HD) and HP devices was higher than that obtained by the dialyzer alone at 30 minutes (62 +/- 4.9 ml/min vs. 25 +/- 2.5 ml/min, P less than 0.02) and after 180 to 210 minutes (32 +/- 3.0 ml/min vs. 19 +/- 2.9 ml/min, P less than 0.02). After 120 minutes the Al clearance by the HP device alone was significantly lower than the initial Al clearance by HP. Combined HD plus HP removed 2.9 +/- 0.4 mg of Al, whereas the total removal of Al by HD alone was 1.5 +/- 0.3 mg (P less than 0.01).

Rapid removal of DFO-chelated aluminum during hemodialysis using polysulfone dialyzers

Aluminum (Al) removal following deferoxamine (DFO) therapy in hemodialysis patients was evaluated in a paired-fashion comparing cuprophane (Travenol 12.11) and polysulfone (Fresenius F-80) dialyzers. QB and QD were held constant at 250 and 500 ml/min, respectively. The polysulfone dialyzer increased total plasma Al clearance from 20.0 +/- 2.8 to 80.5 +/- 7.6 ml/min (P less than 0.01), and reduced the t 1/2 of plasma Al during hemodialysis from 538 +/- 113 to 112 +/- 12 min (P less than 0.01). The polysulfone F-80 dialyzer increased Al removal during the first hour of hemodialysis from 518 +/- 191 to 1812 +/- 720 micrograms/hr (P less than 0.01). During a four hour hemodialysis the F-80 dialyzer returned plasma Al levels to pre-DFO values (103 +/- 36 vs. 93 +/- 23, P less than 0.05), suggesting complete removal of the DFO chelated Al complex. In one patient Al removal was evaluated using cuprophane, F-40, F-60 and F-80 dialyzers and the t 1/2 for Al removed decreased from 484.6 to 276.1 and 108 to 99 minutes, respectively. These data show the Fresenius F-80 polysulfone dialyzer effects the rapid removal of DFO-Al complexes. We propose use of the Fresenius F-80 dialyzer in conjunction with reduced DFO doses and i.m. administration of DFO the day prior to dialysis to limit DFO exposure as a method to decrease DFO-related side-effects in hemodialysis patients.