Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of the anemia of moderate to severe chronic renal failure patients not receiving dialysis

Intravenous iron administration before cardiac surgery reduces red blood cell transfusion in patients without anaemia

BACKGROUND

Reducing the need for blood transfusion among patients undergoing cardiac surgery FLA reduce postoperative complications and mortality. Our study aimed to assess the effects of administering preoperative i.v. ferric carboxymaltose on postoperative red cell transfusion requirements in patients without anaemia undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted between October 2016 and November 2019, with a follow-up period of up to 6 weeks after surgery. Patients without anaemia who underwent on-pump cardiac surgery were included as participants and administered i.v. iron in the form of ferric carboxymaltose or placebo once, 24-72 h before surgery. The primary outcome was the number of red cell units transfused during the first four postoperative days, and the secondary outcome measures were blood haemoglobin concentrations at 4 days and 6 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

The 200 patients included were randomly assigned to the ferric carboxymaltose (n=102) and placebo (n=98) groups. By postoperative Day 4, a significantly lower mean number of red cell units were transfused in the ferric carboxymaltose than in the placebo group, 0.3 (0.8) vs 1.6 (4.4), respectively; P=0.007. The mean haemoglobin concentrations on postoperative Day 4 were 9.7 (1) g dl-1 and 9.3 (1) g dl-1, respectively (P=0.03). Corresponding values at 6 weeks after surgery were 12.6 (1.4) g dl-1 and 11.8 (1.5) g dl-1, respectively (P=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients without anaemia undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery, treatment with a single dose of 1000 mg ferric carboxymaltose i.v. 1-3 days before surgery significantly reduced the need for red cell transfusions and increased the postoperative haemoglobin concentration.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02939794.

Effects of ferric carboxymaltose on hemoglobin level after cardiac surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Perioperative anemia is common in cardiac surgery. Few studies investigated the effect of postoperative intravenous (IV) iron supplementation and were mostly inconclusive.

METHODS

Design: A randomized single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

PARTICIPANTS

195 non-anemic patients were recruited from December 2018 to December 2020: 97 patients received 1 g of ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) and 98 patients received 100 mL of physiological serum on postoperative day 1.

MEASUREMENTS

hemoglobin levels, reticulocyte count, serum iron, serum ferritin, and transferrin saturation were measured at induction of anesthesia, postoperative days 1, 5, and 30. Transfusion rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, critical care unit length of stay, and side effects associated with IV iron administration were measured. The primary outcome was hemoglobin level on day 30. Secondary outcomes included iron balance, transfused red cell packs, and critical care unit length of stay.

RESULTS

At day 30, the hemoglobine level was higher in the FCM group than in the placebo group (mean 12.9 ± 1.2 vs. 12.1 ± 1.3 g/dL (95%CI 0.41-1.23, p-value <0.001)). Patients in the FCM group received fewer blood units (median 1[0-2] unit vs. 2 [0-3] units, p-value = 0.037) and had significant improvement in iron balance compared to the control group. No side effects associated with FCM administration were reported.

CONCLUSION

In this randomized controlled trial, administration of FCM on postoperative day 1 in non-anemic patients undergoing cardiac surgery increased hemoglobin levels by 0.8 g/dL on postoperative day 30, leading to reduced transfusion rate, and improved iron levels on postoperative day 5 and 30.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER

NCT03759964.

Iron supplementation for patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Iron supplementation has been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for its potential to increase baseline hemoglobin and decrease red blood cell transfusion during cardiac surgery. This study's main objective was to evaluate the current evidence for iron administration in cardiac surgery patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science databases, and Google Scholar from inception to 19 November 2020 for RCTs evaluating perioperative iron administration in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The RCTs were assessed using a risk of bias assessment and the quality of evidence was assessed using the grading of recommendations, assessments, development, and evaluations.

RESULTS

We reviewed 1,767 citations, and five studies (n = 554) met the inclusion criteria. The use of iron showed no statistical difference in incidence of transfusion (risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.65 to 1.13). Trial sequential analysis suggested an optimal information size of 1,132 participants, which the accrued information size did not reach.

CONCLUSION

The current literature does not support or refute the routine use of iron therapy in cardiac surgery patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020161927); registered 19 December 2019.

Effects of serine palmitoyltransferase inhibition by myriocin in ad libitum-fed and nutrient-restricted ewes

The fungal isolate myriocin inhibits serine palmitoyltransferase and de novo ceramide synthesis in rodents; however, the effects of myriocin on ceramide concentrations and metabolism have not been previously investigated in ruminants. In our study, 12 non-lactating crossbred ewes received an intravenous bolus of myriocin (0, 0.1, 0.3, or 1.0 mg/kg/body weight [BW]; CON, LOW, MOD, or HIGH) every 48 h for 17 d. Ewes consumed a high-energy diet from day 1 to 14 and were nutrient-restricted (straw only) from day 15 to 17. Blood was collected preprandial and at 1, 6, and 12 h relative to bolus and nutrient restriction. Tissues were collected following euthanasia on day 17. Plasma was analyzed for free fatty acids (FFAs), glucose, and insulin. Plasma and tissue ceramides were quantified using mass spectrometry. HIGH selectively decreased metabolizable energy intake, BW, and plasma insulin, and increased plasma FFA (Dose, P < 0.05). Myriocin linearly decreased plasma very-long-chain (VLC) ceramide and dihydroceramide (DHCer) by day 13 (Linear, P < 0.05). During nutrient restriction, fold-change in FFA was lower with increasing dose (P < 0.05). Nutrient restriction increased plasma C16:0-Cer, an effect suppressed by MOD and HIGH (Dose × Time, P < 0.05). Myriocin linearly decreased most ceramide and DHCer species in the liver and omental and mesenteric adipose, VLC ceramide and DHCer in the pancreas, and C18:0-Cer in skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue (Linear, P ≤ 0.05). We conclude that the intravenous delivery of 0.3 mg of myriocin/kg of BW/48 h decreases circulating and tissue ceramide without modifying energy intake in ruminants.

Iron supplementation for patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Iron administration has been evaluated in several randomized controlled trials for the potential of increasing baseline hemoglobin values and decreasing the incidence of red blood cell transfusion during cardiac surgery. We describe the protocol for a study aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative iron administration in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We will search MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Web of Science, from inception to Nov. 19, 2020, for randomized controlled trials in any language evaluating the perioperative administration of iron in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery; we will also include the first 50 results from Google Scholar. The primary outcome will be the incidence of red blood cell transfusion from the study intervention time until 8 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcomes will be the number of red blood cell units transfused; change in ferritin level, reticulocyte count and hemoglobin concentration after iron administration; and adverse events. We will assess the risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool, and will analyze the primary and secondary outcomes using a random-effects model.

INTERPRETATION

This study will summarize the current evidence about perioperative iron administration in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, help determine whether this intervention should be included in enhanced-recovery protocols, and shape future research if needed. The final manuscript will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO no. CRD42020161927.

Intravenous Iron Isomaltoside 1000 Reduces Postoperative Anemia in Patients Undergoing Elective Urologic Surgery and Those with Urosepsis

Purpose

Postoperative anemia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery. Anemia is also a common feature during sepsis. Therefore, here, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer^®) in patients undergoing elective urologic surgery and in those with urosepsis.

Materials and Methods

This multicenter study was conducted through the review of the medical records of patients with postoperative anemia undergoing elective urologic surgery or with urosepsis in a multicenter hospital. Patients received a single intravenous iron isomaltoside (IIM), and their hemoglobin (Hb) level was evaluated before and after administration of IIM. Safety data included adverse effects and hypersensitivity reactions. In addition, the patients were divided into three groups (200 mg, 400 mg, and 600 mg IIM) to compare Hb changes before and after the administration of IIM.

Results

The study analyzed 52 men and 30 women with a mean age of 67 years. There was a significant difference between pre-treatment Hb and post-treatment Hb according to the type of the surgery after administration (p=0.01) of IIM in patients with postoperative anemia, and the mean preoperative Hb before IIM administration was 8.5 g/dL and that after IIM administration was 9.9 g/dL (p=0.006) in patients with urosepsis. The mean preoperative Hb changed from 10 g/dL to 11 g/dL after administration (p<0.001) of IIM in the whole cohort. There were no side effects due to the administration of intravenous IIM.

Conclusion

A single perioperative intravenous injection of IIM 1000 significantly increased the Hb level in patients with anemia who underwent urologic elective surgery. Moreover, this treatment can be considered to have potential clinical benefits for anemia caused by sepsis.

Trying to Solve the Puzzle of the Interaction of Ascorbic Acid and Iron: Redox, Chelation and Therapeutic Implications

Iron and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) are essential nutrients for the normal growth and development of humans, and their deficiency can result in serious diseases. Their interaction is of nutritional, physiological, pharmacological and toxicological interest, with major implications in health and disease. Millions of people are using pharmaceutical and nutraceutical preparations of these two nutrients, including ferrous ascorbate for the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia and ascorbate combination with deferoxamine for increasing iron excretion in iron overload. The main function and use of vitamin C is its antioxidant activity against reactive oxygen species, which are implicated in many diseases of free radical pathology, including biomolecular-, cellular- and tissue damage-related diseases, as well as cancer and ageing. Ascorbic acid and its metabolites, including the ascorbate anion and oxalate, have metal binding capacity and bind iron, copper and other metals. The biological roles of ascorbate as a vitamin are affected by metal complexation, in particular following binding with iron and copper. Ascorbate forms a complex with Fe³⁺ followed by reduction to Fe²⁺, which may potentiate free radical production. The biological and clinical activities of iron, ascorbate and the ascorbate–iron complex can also be affected by many nutrients and pharmaceutical preparations. Optimal therapeutic strategies of improved efficacy and lower toxicity could be designed for the use of ascorbate, iron and the iron–ascorbate complex in different clinical conditions based on their absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicity (ADMET), pharmacokinetic, redox and other properties. Similar strategies could also be designed in relation to their interactions with food components and pharmaceuticals, as well as in relation to other aspects concerning personalized medicine.

Molecular perspective of iron uptake, related diseases, and treatments

Iron deficiency anemia and anemia of chronic disorders are the most common types of anemia. Disorders of iron metabolism lead to different clinical scenarios such as iron deficiency anemia, iron overload, iron overload with cataract and neurocognitive disorders. Regulation of iron in the body is a complex process and different regulatory proteins are involved in iron absorption and release from macrophages into hematopoietic tissues. Mutation in these regulatory genes is the most important cause of iron refractory iron deficiency anemia (IRIDA). This review provides a glance into the iron regulation process, diseases related to iron metabolism, and appropriate treatments at the molecular level.

The effect of perioperative intravenously administered iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) on transfusion requirements for patients undergoing complex valvular heart surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Anemia is a frequent complication after cardiac surgery especially following reoperation due to previous prosthetic valve failure or multiple valve surgery (including combined coronary artery bypass grafting). This trial explores whether intravenously administered iron isomaltoside 1000 (Monofer®) results in better clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex heart valve surgery who are expected to receive transfusion.

Methods/design

In this prospective, single-center, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 214 patients undergoing reoperation or multiple valve surgery are randomly allocated to either the iron isomaltoside 1000 (IVFe) or the control group from August 2016 to August 2018. The IVFe group receives iron isomaltoside 1000 mg (maximum dose 20 mg/kg) intravenously 3 days before and after the surgery. The control group receives an equivalent volume of normal saline. The primary endpoint is transfusion requirement (more than 1 unit of packed erythrocytes) for postoperative care until discharge and secondary endpoint are major complications, such as delayed ventilator therapy, acute kidney injury, and mortality. Reticulocyte count, plasma hepcidin, iron profiles (serum iron, serum ferritin, total iron-binding capacity, transferrin, transferrin saturation), coagulation profiles, urinary analysis, and chemical profiles are measured for three preoperative baseline-data days and just before surgery, except for hepcidin. After surgery, daily routine basic laboratory tests are measured just before discharge and reticulocyte count, iron profiles, and hepcidin are repeatedly checked for three postoperative days.

Discussions

From our study, we can clarify the following points: the first is the perioperative IVFe effect on the demand for transfusion, and clinical outcomes in reoperation or complex valve surgery and the second is the role of hepcidin in the effect of IVFe on the hemoglobin level increase.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02862665. Registered on August 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2545-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effectiveness of a patient blood management protocol on reduction of allogeneic red blood cell transfusions in orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patient blood management in orthopaedic surgery reduces transfusion risk. The best protocol is unknown. The effectiveness of a protocol based on the Seville Consensus on the reduction of transfusion risk is evaluated and a predictive transfusion equation is proposed in knee surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cohort study in patients undergoing knee and hip arthroplasty from January 2014 to December 2015 at a second level complexity hospital in Vilafranca del Penedès (Barcelona). Patients with Hb between 10 and 13g/dL were classified as anaemic with or without iron deficiency and received iron or combination of iron and erythropoietin. On the day of surgery, tranexamic acid was administered, the Hb drop was measured the next day and the requirements and the transfusion lintel were measured during the stay.

RESULTS

A total of 334 patients were included in the study. The implementation of the programme decreased the transfusion risk from 41.5% to 14.8% at the end of the study. In hip surgery, transfused patients were significantly older, sicker and with lower preoperative Hb. Tranexamic acid did not decrease bleeding. In knee surgery, the administration of tranexamic acid was the variable that most decreased the transfusion risk followed by a high preoperative Hb. The equation predicts transfusion risk with a sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 95.7%.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of the programme reduces transfusion risk. The effectiveness of tranexamic acid varies according to surgery site. The use of iron and recombinant human erythropoietin is necessary to improve Hb.

Iron Treatment Strategies in Nondialysis CKD

In contrast to managing patients on hemodialysis in whom iron strategies are more focused on intravenous iron, nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients may receive either oral or intravenous iron. There are advantages and disadvantages for both strategies. Oral iron is simple and cheap to administer and does not require hospital visits, but is poorly absorbed in advanced CKD and is associated with unpleasant gastrointestinal side effects. Intravenous iron, on the other hand, guarantees iron bioavailability and avoids problems of variable absorption of iron from the gastrointestinal tract, but requires specialist clinic services. Intravenous iron also is associated with hypersensitivity reactions, albeit very rarely. The efficacy of intravenous iron in improving hemoglobin, ferritin, and transferrin saturation is well established, and superior to oral iron, but the long-term safety of this route of administration has not been established and there are theoretical concerns that patients may be exposed to increased oxidative stress and exacerbation of infections. The final choice of iron management strategy will depend on individual physician preference, as well as the facilities that are available.

Renal association clinical practice guideline on Anaemia of Chronic Kidney Disease

Anaemia is a commonly diagnosed complication among patients suffering with chronic kidney disease. If left untreated, it may affect patient quality of life. There are several causes for anaemia in this patient population. As the kidney function deteriorates, together with medications and dietary restrictions, patients may develop iron deficiency, resulting in reduction of iron supply to the bone marrow (which is the body organ responsible for the production of different blood elements). Chronic kidney disease patients may not be able to utilise their own body's iron stores effectively and hence, many patients, particularly those receiving haemodialysis, may require additional iron treatment, usually provided by infusion.With further weakening of kidney function, patients with chronic kidney disease may need additional treatment with a substance called erythropoietin which drives the bone marrow to produce its own blood. This substance, which is naturally produced by the kidneys, becomes relatively deficient in patients with chronic kidney disease. Any patients will eventually require treatment with erythropoietin or similar products that are given by injection.Over the last few years, several iron and erythropoietin products have been licensed for treating anaemia in chronic kidney disease patients. In addition, several publications discussed the benefits of each treatment and possible risks associated with long term treatment. The current guidelines provide advice to health care professionals on how to screen chronic kidney disease patients for anaemia, which patients to investigate for other causes of anaemia, when and how to treat patients with different medications, how to ensure safe prescribing of treatment and how to diagnose and manage complications associated with anaemia and the drugs used for its treatment.

Chronic Kidney Disease

The definition and classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) have evolved over time, but current international guidelines define this condition as decreased kidney function shown by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 60 mL/min per 1·73 m², or markers of kidney damage, or both, of at least 3 months duration, regardless of the underlying cause. Diabetes and hypertension are the main causes of CKD in all high-income and middle-income countries, and also in many low-income countries. Incidence, prevalence, and progression of CKD also vary within countries by ethnicity and social determinants of health, possibly through epigenetic influence. Many people are asymptomatic or have non-specific symptoms such as lethargy, itch, or loss of appetite. Diagnosis is commonly made after chance findings from screening tests (urinary dipstick or blood tests), or when symptoms become severe. The best available indicator of overall kidney function is GFR, which is measured either via exogenous markers (eg, DTPA, iohexol), or estimated using equations. Presence of proteinuria is associated with increased risk of progression of CKD and death. Kidney biopsy samples can show definitive evidence of CKD, through common changes such as glomerular sclerosis, tubular atrophy, and interstitial fibrosis. Complications include anaemia due to reduced production of erythropoietin by the kidney; reduced red blood cell survival and iron deficiency; and mineral bone disease caused by disturbed vitamin D, calcium, and phosphate metabolism. People with CKD are five to ten times more likely to die prematurely than they are to progress to end stage kidney disease. This increased risk of death rises exponentially as kidney function worsens and is largely attributable to death from cardiovascular disease, although cancer incidence and mortality are also increased. Health-related quality of life is substantially lower for people with CKD than for the general population, and falls as GFR declines. Interventions targeting specific symptoms, or aimed at supporting educational or lifestyle considerations, make a positive difference to people living with CKD. Inequity in access to services for this disease disproportionally affects disadvantaged populations, and health service provision to incentivise early intervention over provision of care only for advanced CKD is still evolving in many countries.

Comparison of intravenous low molecular weight iron dextran and intravenous iron sucrose for the correction of anaemia in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients: a randomized single-centre study in Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Intravenous low molecular weight iron dextran and iron sucrose have been used for correction of iron deficiency for many years and have been shown to improve anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there is a paucity of head to head comparisons of these parenteral iron preparations. Such comparative efficacy data would be of particular interest in resource-limited African countries, where the majority of CKD patients are unable to afford erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of these two intravenous iron preparations in pre-dialysis CKD patients.

METHODS

Sixty-seven anaemic pre-dialysis CKD patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups. The low molecular weight iron dextran group (n = 33) received 1000 mg of low molecular weight iron dextran intravenously in four divided doses of 250 mg. The iron sucrose group (n = 34) received 1000 mg of iron sucrose intravenously in five divided doses of 200 mg. Complete blood count, serum creatinine, serum iron, unsaturated iron binding capacity, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation were assessed at baseline. The baseline parameters were repeated in all patients on Day 24. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a rise in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration of ≥1.0 g/dL after iron therapy.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving the primary end point between both arms of the study: [7 (21.9%) low molecular weight iron dextran versus 11 (32.4%) iron sucrose; relative risk 0.68, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-1.70; P = 0.23]. At Day 24, the mean increase in Hb concentration from baseline was comparable between the two groups: low molecular weight iron dextran 0.4 ± 0.7 g/dL versus iron sucrose 0.6 ± 0.9 g/dL, mean difference 0.2 g/dL (95% CI: -0.26-0.61; P = 0.28). The proportion of patients that experienced at least one or more adverse events was 27.3% in the iron dextran group versus 14.7% in the iron sucrose arm (P = 0.21).

CONCLUSION

Both intravenous low molecular weight iron dextran and intravenous iron sucrose are effective in correcting iron deficiency and anaemia in pre-dialysis CKD patients.

Intravenous Iron Therapy in Patients with Iron Deficiency Anemia: Dosing Considerations

Objective. To provide clinicians with evidence-based guidance for iron therapy dosing in patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA), we conducted a study examining the benefits of a higher cumulative dose of intravenous (IV) iron than what is typically administered. Methods. We first individually analyzed 5 clinical studies, averaging the total iron deficit across all patients utilizing a modified Ganzoni formula; we then similarly analyzed 2 larger clinical studies. For the second of the larger studies (Study 7), we also compared the efficacy and retreatment requirements of a cumulative dose of 1500 mg ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) to 1000 mg iron sucrose (IS). Results. The average iron deficit was calculated to be 1531 mg for patients in Studies 1-5 and 1392 mg for patients in Studies 6-7. The percentage of patients who were retreated with IV iron between Days 56 and 90 was significantly (p < 0.001) lower (5.6%) in the 1500 mg group, compared to the 1000 mg group (11.1%). Conclusions. Our data suggests that a total cumulative dose of 1000 mg of IV iron may be insufficient for iron repletion in a majority of patients with IDA and a dose of 1500 mg is closer to the actual iron deficit in these patients.

Switching patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease from oral iron to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose: effects on erythropoiesis-stimulating agent requirements, costs, hemoglobin and iron status

Background

Patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) often receive an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) and oral iron treatment. This study evaluated whether a switch from oral iron to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose can reduce ESA requirements and improve iron status and hemoglobin in patients with ND-CKD.

Methods

This prospective, single arm and single-center study included adult patients with ND-CKD (creatinine clearance ≤40 mL/min), hemoglobin 11–12 g/dL and iron deficiency (ferritin <100 μg/L or transferrin saturation <20%), who were regularly treated with oral iron and ESA during 6 months prior to inclusion. Study patients received an intravenous ferric carboxymaltose dose of 1,000 mg iron, followed by a 6-months ESA/ ferric carboxymaltose maintenance regimen (target: hemoglobin 12 g/dL, transferrin saturation >20%). Outcome measures were ESA dose requirements during the observation period after initial ferric carboxymaltose treatment (primary endpoint); number of hospitalizations and transfusions, renal function before and after ferric carboxymaltose administration, number of adverse reactions (secondary endpoints). Hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, ferritin and transferrin saturation were measured monthly from baseline until end of study. Creatinine clearance, proteinuria, C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and alkaline phosphatase bimonthly from baseline until end of study.

Results

Thirty patients were enrolled (age 70.1±11.4 years; mean±SD). Mean ESA consumption was significantly reduced by 83.2±10.9% (from 41,839±3,668 IU/patient to 6,879±4,271 IU/patient; p<0.01). Hemoglobin increased by 0.7±0.3 g/dL, ferritin by 196.0±38.7 μg/L and transferrin saturation by 5.3±2.9% (month 6 vs. baseline; all p<0.01). No ferric carboxymaltose-related adverse events were reported and no patient withdrew or required transfusions during the study.

Conclusion

Among patients with ND-CKD and stable normal or borderline hemoglobin, switching from oral iron to intravenous ferric carboxymaltose was associated with significant improvements in hematological and iron parameters and a significant reduction in ESA dose requirements in this single-center pilot study.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02232906

Iron deficiency anemia in a ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) with concurrent chronic renal failure

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 16-year-old vasectomized male ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) with a history of suspected chronic renal failure was evaluated because of extreme lethargy, hyperpnea, and abscess of the right pectoral scent gland.

CLINICAL FINDINGS

Examination of the anesthetized patient revealed an impacted right pectoral scent gland with serosanguineous exudate. A CBC and serum biochemical analysis revealed severe anemia, marked azotemia, hyperphosphatemia, and hypocalcemia.

TREATMENT AND OUTCOME

Supportive care (including fluid therapy and phosphorus binder administration) was initiated for renal failure; the affected gland was cleaned, and antimicrobials were administered. The patient received 1 blood transfusion, and darbepoetin alfa was administered weekly to stimulate RBC production. Anemia and azotemia persisted. Three months after treatment started, serum iron analysis revealed that iron deficiency was the probable cause for the lack of a consistent regenerative response to darbepoetin injections. Iron dextran injections resulted in a marked regenerative response; however, serum biochemical analysis results after the second injection were consistent with hepatic injury. Hepatic enzyme activities normalized following discontinuation of iron dextran treatment, but the lemur's Hct declined rapidly despite supplementary iron administration PO. The patient developed severe mandibular osteomyelitis and was euthanized because of poor prognosis. Postmortem evaluation of hepatic iron concentration confirmed iron deficiency.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The family Lemuridae is considered prone to hemosiderosis and hemochromatosis, which delayed rapid diagnosis and treatment of the lemur's disease. Apparent hepatic injury following iron dextran injections further complicated treatment. Findings for this lemur support the use of species-specific total iron binding capacity and total serum iron and ferritin concentrations in evaluation of an animal with suspected iron deficiency.

The iron cycle in chronic kidney disease (CKD): from genetics and experimental models to CKD patients

Iron is essential for most living organisms but iron excess can be toxic. Cellular and systemic iron balance is therefore tightly controlled. Iron homeostasis is dysregulated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and contributes to the anemia that is prevalent in this patient population. Iron supplementation is one cornerstone of anemia management in CKD patients, but has not been rigorously studied in large prospective randomized controlled trials. This review highlights important advances from genetic studies and animal models that have provided key insights into the molecular mechanisms governing iron homeostasis and its disturbance in CKD, and summarizes how these findings may yield advances in the care of this patient population.

Heme iron polypeptide for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Anemia secondary to iron deficiency is common in patients with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) but it is unclear if oral supplementation is as effective as intravenous (IV) supplementation in re-establishing iron stores. The purpose of this study was to determine if oral Heme Iron Polypeptide (HIP) is as effective as IV iron sucrose in the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia for patients with ND-CKD.

Methods

Forty ND-CKD patients were randomized; 18 to HIP 11 mg orally 3 times per day and 22 to IV iron sucrose 200 mg monthly for 6 months. Baseline clinical and laboratory data were collected for all patients. The primary and secondary outcomes for the study were hemoglobin (Hgb) concentration and iron indices [ferritin and percentage transferrin saturation (TSAT)] at the end of 6 months respectively. Adverse events were also compared.

Results

The baseline demographic characteristics and laboratory values were similar for the two groups. After 6 months of treatment, Hb in the HIP group was 117 g/L and 113 g/L in the IV sucrose group (p = 0.37). The TSAT at 6 months was not different between the two groups {p = 0.82}but the serum ferritin was significantly higher in the IV iron sucrose group {85.5 ug/L in HIP and 244 ug/L; p = 0.004}. Overall adverse events were not different between the groups.

Conclusion

HIP is similar in efficacy to IV iron sucrose in maintaining hemoglobin in ND-CKD patients with no differences in adverse events over 6 months. It is unclear if the greater ferritin values in the IV iron sucrose group are clinically significant.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00318812

A hepcidin lowering agent mobilizes iron for incorporation into red blood cells in an adenine-induced kidney disease model of anemia in rats

BACKGROUND

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) that negatively impacts the quality of life and is associated with numerous adverse outcomes. Excess levels of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin are thought to contribute to anemia in CKD patients by decreasing iron availability from the diet and from body stores. Adenine treatment in rats has been proposed as an animal model of anemia of CKD with high hepcidin levels that mirrors the condition in human patients.

METHODS

We developed a modified adenine-induced kidney disease model with a higher survival rate than previously reported models, while maintaining persistent kidney disease and anemia. We then tested whether the small molecule bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibitor LDN-193189, which was previously shown to lower hepcidin levels in rodents, mobilized iron into the plasma and improved iron-restricted erythropoiesis in this model.

RESULTS

Adenine-treated rats exhibited increased hepatic hepcidin mRNA, decreased serum iron, increased spleen iron content, low hemoglobin (Hb) and inappropriately low erythropoietin (EPO) levels relative to the degree of anemia. LDN-193189 administration to adenine-treated rats lowered hepatic hepcidin mRNA, mobilized stored iron into plasma and increased Hb content of reticulocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that hepcidin lowering agents may provide a new therapeutic strategy to improve iron availability for erythropoiesis in CKD.

Comparison of the safety and efficacy of 3 iron sucrose iron maintenance regimens in children, adolescents, and young adults with CKD: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency is a common cause of anemia in young persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Iron repletion with intravenous (IV) iron formulations has been studied in children; maintenance IV iron regimens have not been reported extensively.

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter randomized trial of IV iron sucrose.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

145 children, adolescents, and young adults with CKD receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy were stratified by dialysis category (hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, or non-dialysis dependent) and weight (<50 and ≥50 kg).

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 dosing arms: 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg (maximum single dose, 100 mg), stratified into hemodialysis versus nonhemodialysis (peritoneal dialysis or non-dialysis-dependent CKD) groups. Patients treated with hemodialysis received study medication once every other week for 6 doses. Patients in the nonhemodialysis group received study medication once every 4 weeks for 3 doses.

OUTCOMES

We assessed adverse event rates between dosing groups. The main clinical end point was a composite of hemoglobin level ≥10.5-14.0 g/dL, inclusive; transferrin saturation ≥20%-50%, inclusive; and stable ESA dosing (±25% of baseline dose).

RESULTS

Between-group difference for composite clinical end point rate attainment was -3.9% (95% CI, -21.4% to 13.7%) for the 1.0-mg/kg group versus 0.5-mg/kg group, +3.9% (95% CI, -15.1% to 23.0%) for the 2-mg/kg group versus 0.5-mg/kg group, and +7.8% (95% CI, -10.9% to 26.5%) for the 2-mg/kg group versus 1-mg/kg group. No differences were noted between regimens in reported adverse effects, which were all minor.

LIMITATIONS

Absence of a control group receiving no IV iron. Short duration of intervention and observation. A small proportion of patients having achieved the primary clinical outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

IV iron sucrose at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg at the intervals prescribed is noninferior to higher doses in maintaining hemoglobin levels >10.5 g/dL in children, adolescents, and young adults receiving ESA therapy.

Current status of pharmacologic therapies in patient blood management

Patient blood management(1,2) incorporates patient-centered, evidence-based medical and surgical approaches to improve patient outcomes by relying on the patient's own (autologous) blood rather than allogeneic blood. Particular attention is paid to preemptive measures such as anemia management. The emphasis on the approaches being "patient-centered" is to distinguish them from previous approaches in transfusion medicine, which have been "product-centered" and focused on blood risks, costs, and inventory concerns rather than on patient outcomes. Patient blood management(3) structures its goals by avoiding blood transfusion(4) with effective use of alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion.(5) These alternatives include autologous blood procurement, preoperative autologous blood donation, acute normovolemic hemodilution, and intra/postoperative red blood cell (RBC) salvage and reinfusion. Reviewed here are the available pharmacologic tools for anemia and blood management: erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), iron therapy, hemostatic agents, and potentially, artificial oxygen carriers.

The effect of intravenous and oral iron administration on perioperative anaemia and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Anaemia is a frequent complication after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Iron therapy has been variably employed by medical centres over the years. In our study we test the clinical effectiveness of intravenous and oral iron supplementation in correcting anaemia, and its impact on blood transfusion requirements, in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with three parallel groups of patients. Group I (n = 54): intravenous iron(III)-hydroxide sucrose complex, three doses of 100 mg/24 h during pre- and postoperative hospitalization and 1 pill/24 h of oral placebo in the same period and during 1 month after discharge. Group II (n = 53): oral ferrous fumarate iron 1 pill/24 h pre- and postoperatively and during 1 month after discharge, and intravenous placebo while hospitalized. Group III (n = 52): oral and intravenous placebo pre- and postoperatively, following the same protocol. Data were collected preoperatively, at theatre, at intensive care unit admission, before hospital discharge and 1 month later.

RESULTS

(1) Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and surgical procedures were similar in the three groups; (2) no inter-group differences were found in haemoglobin and haematocrit during the postoperative period; (3) the intravenous iron group showed higher serum ferritin levels at hospital discharge (1321 ± 495 ng/ml; P < 0.001) and 1 month later (610 ± 387; P < 0.001) compared with the other groups and (4) we did not observe statistical differences in blood transfusion requirements between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of intravenous or oral iron supplementation proved ineffective in correcting anaemia after cardiopulmonary bypass and did not reduce blood transfusion requirements. [Current Controlled Trials number: NCT01078818 (oral and intravenous iron in patients postoperative cardiovascular surgery under EC)].

Role of iron deficiency and anemia in cardio-renal syndromes

Chronic heart failure is a common disorder associated with unacceptably high mortality rates. Chronic renal disease and anemia are two important comorbidities that significantly influence morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Progress in CHF again may cause worsening of kidney function and anemia. To describe this vicious cycle, the term cardio-renal anemia syndrome has been suggested. Iron deficiency is part of the pathophysiology of anemia in both CHF and chronic kidney disease, which makes it an interesting target for treatment of anemia in cardio-renal anemia syndrome. Recently, studies have highlighted the potential clinical benefits of treating iron deficiency in patients with CHF, even if these patients are nonanemic. This article summarizes studies investigating the influence of iron deficiency with or without anemia in chronic kidney disease and CHF and gives an overview of preparations of intravenous iron currently available.

Decisive indicator for gastrointestinal workup in anemic patients with nondialysis chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Anemia and iron deficiency are universal problems in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, decisive indicator to guide the further gastrointestinal (GI) workup has not been determined.

METHODS

We included 104 anemic patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD stages 3-5 (38 patients at stage 3, 26 patients at stage 4, and 40 patients at stage 5). Hemoglobin, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), and corrected reticulocyte count data were assessed to evaluate diagnostic utility for bleeding-related GI lesions, which were identified by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy.

RESULTS

Bleeding-related GI lesions were found in 55 (52.9%) patients, and patients with stage 5 CKD had a higher prevalence of gastric lesions than patients with CKD stage 3 or 4 (all p < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves used to predict bleeding-related lesions were 0.69 for TSAT (p = 0.002) and 0.61 for serum ferritin (p = 0.085). The sensitivity and specificity of a cutoff value for TSAT < 20% were 0.59 and 0.74, respectively. Hemoglobin, MCV, and corrected reticulocyte levels had no significant diagnostic utility. On multivariable logistic regression, the chance of GI lesions increased by 6% for each 1% reduction in TSAT and increased 4.1-fold for patients with CKD stage 5 (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TSAT is a useful indicator for determining the GI workup in anemic patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD stages 3-5. Stage 5 CKD is independently associated with bleeding-related lesions and TSAT should be used cautiously in these patients.

The investigation and treatment of secondary anaemia

Secondary anaemia or the anaemia of chronic disease (ACD) is the commonest form of anaemia in hospitalised patients and the second most prevalent anaemia worldwide after iron deficiency. It is characterised by defective iron incorporation in erythropoiesis, an impaired response to erythropoietin, a decrease in erythropoietin production and cytokine induced shortening of red cell survival. For many patients with ACD the cause is apparent but for many others the underlying disease needs to be determined and such patients are often referred to haematologists for investigation. The search for the cause can be a fascinating exercise in good history taking, examination skills and performing and interpreting appropriate investigations. This review covers the pathogenesis and causes of ACD and then discusses the clinical and laboratory investigation of a patient with suspected ACD. Finally, the management of a patient with ACD is discussed including erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), intravenous iron and future therapies.

A randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric carboxymaltose with oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia of non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency is a common cause of anaemia and hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) patients. Current intravenous iron agents cannot be administered in a single high dose because of adverse effects. Ferric carboxymaltose, a non-dextran parenteral iron preparation, can be rapidly administered in high doses.

METHODS

This open-label trial randomized 255 subjects with glomerular filtration rates ≤ 45 mL/min/1.73 m(2), haemoglobin ≤ 11 g/dL, transferrin saturation ≤ 25%, ferritin ≤ 300 ng/mL, and stable ESA dose to either intravenous ferric carboxymaltose 1000 mg over 15 min (with up to two additional doses of 500 mg at 2-week intervals) or oral ferrous sulphate 325 mg thrice daily for a total of 195 mg elemental iron daily for 56 days.

RESULTS

In the modified intent-to-treat population, the proportion of subjects achieving a haemoglobin increase ≥ 1 g/dL at any time was 60.4% with ferric carboxymaltose and 34.7% with oral iron (P < 0.001). At Day 42, mean increase in haemoglobin was 0.95 ± 1.12 vs 0.50 ± 1.23 g/dL (P = 0.005), mean increase in ferritin was 432 ± 189 ng/mL vs 18 ± 45 ng/mL (P < 0.001) and mean increase in transferrin saturation was 13.6 ± 11.9% vs 6.1 ± 8.1% (P < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events were significantly fewer with ferric carboxymaltose than with oral iron (2.7% and 26.2%, respectively; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that 1000 mg ferric carboxymaltose can be rapidly administered, is more effective and is better tolerated than oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency in ND-CKD patients.

Detection, evaluation, and management of iron-restricted erythropoiesis

Progress in our understanding of iron-restricted erythropoiesis has been made possible by important advances in defining the molecular mechanisms of iron homeostasis. The detection and diagnostic classification of iron-restricted erythropoiesis can be a challenging process for the clinician. Newer assays for markers of inflammation may allow more targeted management of the anemia in these conditions. The availability of new intravenous iron preparations provides new options for the treatment of iron-restricted erythropoiesis. This review summarizes recent advances regarding the detection, evaluation, and management of iron-restricted erythropoiesis.

FDA report: Ferumoxytol for intravenous iron therapy in adult patients with chronic kidney disease

On June 30, 2009, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ferumoxytol (Feraheme injection, AMAG Pharmaceuticals), an iron-containing product for intravenous (IV) administration, for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The safety and efficacy of ferumoxytol were assessed in three randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trials. Two trials evaluated patients with nondialysis dependent CKD and a third trial assessed patients undergoing hemodialysis. Randomization was either to ferumoxytol or oral iron. Ferumoxytol was administered as two 510 mg IV injections, separated by 3-8 days. Oral iron, Ferro-Sequels, was administered at a dose of 100 mg twice daily for 21 days. In all three clinical trials, ferumoxytol administration increased the mean blood hemoglobin (Hgb) concentrations by approximately 1.0 g/dL over the 35 day period, a mean increase that was greater than what was observed in patients receiving oral iron. Patients receiving ferumoxytol also had increases in blood transferrin saturation (TSAT) and ferritin values. For the proposed ferumoxytol dosing regimen, 4.9% of patients had serum ferritin >or=800 ng/mL and TSAT >or=50% post-treatment. The most important ferumoxytol safety concerns were hypersensitivity reactions and/or hypotension. Anaphylaxis or anaphylactoid reactions were reported in 0.2% of subjects, and other adverse reactions potentially associated with hypersensitivity (e.g., pruritus, rash, urticaria, or wheezing) were reported in 3.7%. Hypotension was observed in 1.9%, including three patients with serious hypotensive reactions. Ferumoxytol administration may transiently affect the diagnostic ability of magnetic resonance imaging and the drug label provides further information regarding this effect.

Integrated Care of Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Concepts in Intravenous Iron Management: Part One

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has become a worldwide public health issue with increasing prevalence in the United States. As kidney function declines, anemia or other complications may arise, and hemodialysis (HD) or kidney transplantation may be needed. Early intervention and treatment of CKD complications will improve clinical outcomes and may delay or prevent disease sequelae. Primary or adjuvant iron replacement in CKD patients with anemia is recommended. The National Kidney Foundation guidelines state that patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy and HD will require intravenous (IV) iron for optimal iron stores and ESA efficacy. This article, the first of a two-part series, details the optimization of IV iron therapy in CKD patients, clinical trial evaluation of IV versus oral iron in the non–HD-dependent CKD patient, and a comparison of the four available IV iron agents. The percent changes in ESA utilization in conjunction with iron therapy and the associated cost savings are also addressed. The second article in this series goes on to describe elements of the medication use process for care of CKD patients with anemia.

Iron supplementation in the non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) patient: oral or intravenous?

BACKGROUND

The management of iron-deficiency anaemia in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD) remains controversial, particularly regarding the use of oral versus intravenous iron supplementation.

METHODS

A PubMed search from 1970 to February 2009 was conducted to identify relevant research articles.

FINDINGS

Iron supplementation is advisable for all iron-deficient CKD patients receiving erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs), and intravenous iron may be preferable to oral iron. However, there is also a growing body of data indicating that iron supplementation may avoid or delay the need for ESA therapy in some ND-CKD patients. In each of four randomised trials that included ND-CKD patients without ESA, the haemoglobin response was greater with i.v. versus oral iron. Moreover, some ND-CKD patients who remain anaemic on oral iron may subsequently respond to i.v. iron. Newer preparations (ferric carboxymaltose and ferumoxytol) permit rapid, high-dose administration. In a randomised study, a single 15-minute injection of ferric carboxymaltose, with up to two additional doses as required, resulted in 53.2% of ND-CKD patients achieving > or =1 g/dL increase in haemoglobin by day 56 without ESA, compared to 29.9% of patients given oral iron supplements. Two large, randomised, ongoing trials will address the important question of whether i.v. or oral iron supplementation affects the progression of renal dysfunction. While i.v. iron is more costly than oral iron, the cost differential over time may be lower than widely believed, and i.v. therapy avoids the poor absorption, gastrointestinal intolerance and non-compliance associated with oral preparations. In terms of safety, true anaphylaxis does not occur with modern preparations such as iron sucrose and iron gluconate. The novel preparations ferric carboxymaltose and ferumoxytol do not require a test dose and appear to offer a good safety profile, but long-term safety monitoring is mandatory.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous iron offers an effective, feasible route towards reducing the heavy burden of iron-deficiency anaemia in the non-dialysis CKD patient, even in the absence of ESA therapy.

Bone marrow iron, iron indices, and the response to intravenous iron in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD

BACKGROUND

Information about iron stores and their relationship with transferrin saturation (TSAT), serum ferritin, and the erythropoietic response to iron therapy is scarce in anemic non-dialysis-dependent patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We examined the diagnostic utility of peripheral-iron indices and the erythropoietic response to intravenous iron as indices of iron store depletion using bone marrow iron as a reference test in anemic non-dialysis-dependent patients with CKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Diagnostic test study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

100 anemic (hemoglobin <11 g/dL) patients with CKD stages 3-5, not receiving epoetin and iron.

INDEX TESTS

TSAT index and serum ferritin level at baseline and increase in hemoglobin level 1 month after 200 mg of iron sucrose daily for 5 days.

REFERENCE TEST

Bone marrow iron (assessed using aspiration and Perls' stain), depleted versus replete, at baseline.

MEASUREMENTS

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity of peripheral-iron indices and erythropoietic response to describe bone marrow iron stores.

RESULTS

Bone marrow iron stores were depleted in 48% of patients at baseline. In iron-depleted versus -replete subjects, mean hemoglobin level, median TSAT index, median serum ferritin level, and hemoglobin level increase after iron sucrose administration were 8.74 +/- 1.1 (SD) versus 9.22 +/- 0.9 g/dL (P = 0.02), 19% (interquartile range [IQR], 15%) versus 28% (IQR, 12%; P < 0.001), 100 (IQR, 131) versus 220 ng/mL (IQR, 213; P < 0.001), and 1.2 +/- 0.4 versus 0.8 +/- 0.3 g/dL (P < 0.001), respectively. TSAT, ferritin level, and increase in hemoglobin level AUROCs were similar: 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.66-0.85), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.65-0.84), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Bone marrow iron as the index of iron stores.

CONCLUSIONS

Half the anemic patients with CKD stages 3-5 had depleted iron stores. Peripheral-iron indices and erythropoietic response had equivalent, but limited, utility in identifying depletion of bone marrow iron stores. Use of these indices to indicate depletion of iron stores should be reconsidered.

Clinical use of intravenous iron: administration, efficacy, and safety

This section reviews the history, pharmacology, administration, efficacy, and toxicity of intravenous iron. Intravenous iron offers advantages over oral iron for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia across a wide range of disease states associated with absolute and functional iron deficiency. However, there remain concerns about the acute safety profiles of the available preparations and the potential for long-term toxicity with their repeated administration. Seven intravenous iron formulations are available. Confusion concerning the relative toxicities of the different formulations abounds. The similarities and differences are discussed. Iron repletion has been associated with adverse outcomes in infections. The relationship, if any, between intravenous iron administration and infections is reviewed. The potential advantages of total dose infusion (TDI), complete repletion in a single setting, are highlighted. A new paradigm for iron replacement therapy in iron deficiency anemia is presented.

Can the response to iron therapy be predicted in anemic nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Anemia is iron responsive in 30 to 50% of nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the utility of bone marrow iron stores and peripheral iron indices to predict the erythropoietic response is not settled. We investigated the accuracy of peripheral and central iron indices to predict the response to intravenous iron in nondialysis patients with CKD and anemia.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A diagnostic study was conducted on 100 nondialysis patients who had CKD and anemia and were erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and iron naive. Bone marrow iron stores were evaluated by aspiration. Hemoglobin, transferrin saturation index (TSAT), and ferritin were measured at baseline and 1 month after 1000 mg of intravenous iron sucrose. Posttest predictive values for the erythropoietic response (> or =1-g/dl increase in hemoglobin) of peripheral and central iron indices were calculated.

RESULTS

The erythropoietic response was noted in a higher proportion in bone marrow iron-deplete than in iron-replete patients (63 versus 30%). Peripheral iron indices had a moderate accuracy in predicting response. The positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPV) were 76 and 72% for a TSAT of 15% and 74 and 70% for a ferritin of 75 ng/ml, respectively. In the final logistic regression model, including TSAT and ferritin, the chances of a positive response increased by 7% for each 1% decrease in TSAT.

CONCLUSIONS

Because an erythropoietic response is seen in half of patients and even one third of those with iron-replete stores responded whereas peripheral indices had only a moderate utility in predicting response, the therapeutic trial to intravenous iron seems to be a useful tool in the management of anemia in nondialysis patients with CKD.

Can intravenous iron therapy meet the unmet needs created by the new restrictions on erythropoietic stimulating agents?

In 2008, after reports of an association between erythropoietic stimulating agent (ESA) therapy and the potential for either thrombotic cardiovascular events or more rapid tumor progression in some cancers, the Food and Drug Administration changed the product labeling for ESAs, adding a black box warning as well as more restrictive indications, especially in oncology patients. In addition the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has placed significant restrictions on payments for ESA therapy. These new limitations on ESA have led to increased use of transfusions in anemic cancer patients. This increase in allogeneic transfusions potentially will place an additional burden on the US blood supply. Although allogeneic blood transfusion is one answer to ESA restrictions, the use of intravenous iron therapy (IV iron) is another possible alternative. We will discuss the use of IV iron as primary therapy for anemia, the use of combination IV iron and ESA therapy to improve efficiency and decrease costs, and evidence that IV iron with and without ESA therapy can reduce allogeneic blood transfusions in surgical patients. We will also review the available IV iron agents and their comparative safety profiles.

Maintenance of elevated versus physiological iron indices in non-anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

An optimal haemoglobin (Hb) response to erythropoietin requires elevated iron indices in dialysis patients; however, it is unknown if the same applies in chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

One hundred patients [CKD Stages 3-5, Hb >or= 110 g/L, iron replete, erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA)-naive, 47% diabetic, median age 69.5 years] were block-randomized in an open-label study to receive up to 200 mg intravenous iron sucrose (Group A, n = 52) bimonthly or oral iron sulphate (Group B) to maintain raised and normal iron indices (respectively) over 12 months. The primary endpoint was the change in Hb concentration at 12 months or at termination after at least 6 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients reached the primary endpoint (43, Group A; 42, Group B). Initial Hb was 119 +/- 7 vs 116 +/- 12 g/L (mean +/- standard deviation); ferritin 122 (71-176), median (inter-quartile range), vs 90 microg/L (58-150); transferrin saturation (TSat) 22 (18-26) vs 21% (15-24); and creatinine 240 (195-313) vs 230 micromol/L (184-352). Ferritin and TSat differed by month 2 [157 (103-220) vs 96 microg/L (73-162), P = 0.003] and month 6 [25 (20-31) vs 21% (17-27), P = 0.02], respectively. At study end, Hb did not differ between groups (121 +/- 10 vs 117 +/- 13 g/L). Ferritin was 362 (310-458) vs 125 microg/L (84-190), P < 0.001; TSat 30 (23-34) vs 21% (18-24), P < 0.001; and creatinine 229 (188-326) vs 272 micromol/L (195-413), P = NS. For patients (Groups A and B, n = 27 in each group) whose creatinine regression slope increased (indicating worsening function), the fall in Hb over 12 months also did not differ between groups despite adequate separation in iron indices. Serious adverse events overall did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated iron indices did not increase Hb synthesis in ESA-naive, iron replete, pre-dialysis patients with Hb >110 g/L.

Is There a Difference between the Allergic Potencies of the Iron Sucrose and Low Molecular Weight Iron Dextran?

BACKGROUND

The objectives of the present trial were to compare the side effects and safety of two intravenous iron preparations (iron-dextran, iron-sucrose) in patients with end stage renal disease.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients were randomized and assigned to one of two treatment groups (iron-dextran, n = 30; iron-sucrose, n = 30). A standard test dose of 25 mg of low molecular weight iron-dextran and iron-sucrose were administered over 15 minutes during the initial visit, monitoring very closely for adverse reactions. If this dose was well tolerated, 75 mg of iron diluted in 100 mL of normal saline was administered over 30 minutes. Adverse reactions were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 51.5+/-17.4 years (range, 21 to 80 years). Of the 30 patients who received low molecular weight iron-dextran, 11 developed side effects (pruritus, 1 patient; wheezing, 1 patient; chest pain, 1 patient; nausea, 4 patients; hypotension, 1 patient; swelling, 1 patient; headache, 2 patients). Of the 30 patients who received iron-sucrose, 13 developed side effects (pruritus, 1 patient; wheezing, 1 patient; diarrhea, 1 patient; nausea, 4 patients; hypotension, 2 patients; swelling, 1 patient; headache, 3 patients). Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups in our study (p > 0.05). We did not observe any serious reactions in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that the incidence of side effects associated with iron-dextran was not different than that of iron-sucrose in our study. Large scale randomized studies are needed to compare the full side effect profile of intravenous iron preparations more precisely.

Managing Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease

Anemia begins early in the course of declining kidney function and is a frequent complication of chronic kidney disease. Both anemia and chronic kidney disease are underdiagnosed and undertreated. Anemia is associated with significantly increased risk of morbidity and mortality, including increased risks of left ventricular hypertrophy and heart failure. Although the detrimental effects of anemia are more common in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease, it has been suggested that correcting anemia in early stage kidney disease may improve health-related quality of life and also delay the progression to end-stage kidney disease. The identification of anemia in early stage chronic kidney disease and its aggressive management may also improve cardiovascular complications. Anemia of chronic kidney disease is predominantly a result of abnormal erythropoietin production and iron deficiency. Anemia may be the result of kidney failure itself, blood losses, nutritional deficiencies, and endocrine disorders. Guidelines and protocols for treating anemia can assist practitioners in identifying patients with anemia, treating anemia, evaluating response to treatment, and modifying treatment based on response. Erythropoeisis-stimulating agents have been shown to be effective in treating anemia in predialysis and dialysis patients. Iron supplementation is usually required in patients receiving erythropoeisis-stimulating agent therapy or with iron deficiency. Successfully managing anemia of chronic kidney disease with treatment strategies that accommodate patient lifestyle and improve compliance is paramount. Primary care physicians play an important role in the care of patients with kidney disease, as does collaboration with other medical professionals involved in their care.

Intravenous versus oral iron supplementation for the treatment of anemia in CKD: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Iron supplementation is essential for the treatment of patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). It is not clear which is the best method of iron administration.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis. A search was performed until January 2008 of MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference proceedings in nephrology, and reference lists of included trials.

SETTING & POPULATION

Patients with CKD (stages III to V). We included dialysis patients and patients with CKD not on dialysis therapy (hereafter referred to as patients with CKD).

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

We included all randomized controlled trials regardless of publication status or language.

INTERVENTION

Intravenous (IV) versus oral iron supplementation.

OUTCOMES MEASURES

Primary outcomes assessed: absolute hemoglobin (Hb) level or change in Hb level from baseline. We also assessed all-cause mortality, erythropoiesis-stimulating agent requirement, adverse events, ferritin level, and need for renal replacement therapy in patients with CKD.

RESULTS

13 trials were identified, 6 including patients with CKD and 7 including dialysis patients. Compared with oral iron, there was a significantly greater Hb level in dialysis patients treated with IV iron (weighted mean difference, 0.83 g/dL; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 1.57). Meta-regression showed a positive association between Hb level increase and IV iron dose administered and a negative association with baseline Hb level. For patients with CKD, there was a small but significant difference in Hb level favoring the IV iron group (weighted mean difference, 0. 31 g/dL; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0. 53). Data for all-cause mortality were sparse, and there was no difference in adverse events between the IV- and oral-treated patients.

LIMITATIONS

There was significant heterogeneity between trials. Follow-up was limited to 2 to 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review shows that patients on hemodialysis therapy have better Hb level response when treated with IV iron. For patients with CKD, this effect is small.

Intravenous iron: from anathema to standard of care

A growing body of literature supports the use of intravenous iron as a compliment to erythropoiesis stimulatory therapy and in a significant number of disease states where iron is necessary and oral iron is ineffective or not tolerated. The differences in efficacy, safety, and clinical nature of serious adverse events that occur with the various iron preparations are poorly understood. Misinterpretation of adverse events leads to underutilization of this important treatment modality. Understanding the history of the development and use of intravenous iron is crucial to appreciate its importance in the management of anemias of dialysis, cancer, and cancer chemotherapy and properly assess side effects and toxicity. The benefits seen with intravenous iron therapy are independent of the pretreatment levels of serum ferritin, iron, total iron binding capacity, and percent transferrin saturation. Intravenous iron has been shown to overcome hepcidin induced iron restricted erythropoiesis in iron-replete patients. Available clinical and experimental data suggest that increased utilization of intravenous iron should be considered.